DOCSLIB.ORG

Better Together

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Better Together Better Together Promoting sustainable prosperity and growth for all PwC’s 11th International Development Conference summary report #PwCIDC2019 2 PwC’s 11th International Development Conference summary report PwC’s 11th International Development Conference summary report 3 Foreword We are delighted to share with you our summary of PwC’s 11th International Development Conference, held in London on 6th of March 2019. The conference attracted over 250 international development practitioners from the UK and elsewhere, from a range of professional backgrounds including public sector, academia, civil society and the private sector. Under the overall theme of “Better Together: promoting sustainable prosperity and growth for all” we examined a number of key issues for international development including: the dynamic between trade and aid, aid post- Brexit, the new skills drive, technology- driven innovation and large-scale programme management. This report summarises the key messages that emerged from our discussions on the day. We would like to extend our sincere thanks to all of the speakers, panel members and attendees for ensuring this was such an engaging and thought provoking event. We hope you enjoy our report, and we look forward to continuing an ongoing conversation with you on topics that most matter to us in international development. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with us directly. Dr David Armstrong PwC UK Partner, International Development Industry Leader 4 PwC’s 11th International Development Conference summary report PwC’s 11th International Development Conference summary report 5 6 PwC’s 11th International Development Conference summary report Contents The case for aid 8 The skills drive 10 Seizing the opportunity 12 Smartphones and smart cities 16 Billions to trillions 18 Friends or foes? 20 Technology-enabled healthcare 22 The problem with major programmes 24 Combatting modern slavery 26 Aid post-Brexit 28 Closing remarks 30 PwC’s 11th International Development Conference summary report 7 The case for aid Essential building blocks of a credible and effective international policy Speaker A case for investing in driving sustainable development. Since 2015, the UK has become one of development the only five donor countries (the others being Denmark, Luxembourg, Norway, “Our latest inquiry provides a Sweden) meeting the internationally pertinent reminder of the increasing agreed commitment to spend 0.7% global humanitarian challenges of Gross National Income (GNI) on Stephen Twigg that we face. There are over 20 overseas aid. This commitment was Former MP and former Chair of the million internally displaced persons applauded internationally and built trust Commons Select Committee for among the UK’s international peers. International Development and refugees in Africa, half of which are children. Globally more DFID’s track record people are displaced today than While throughout its history DFID has Host at any time in the last 70 years. By 2030, 80% of the poorest people faced scrunity, through its vision and commitment it has improved the lives in the world will live in fragile and of many of the world’s poorest people. conflict affected countries; and It has played a vital role in lifting more climate change exacerbates further than a billion people out of extreme that fragility. If we are to tackle poverty over the last 22 years and DFID these challenges and meet the is recognised as a global leader in Prof. Myles Wickstead CBE Sustainable Development Goals international development. Visiting Professor, NED Development Initiatives, Kings College (SDGs), DFID must maintain a vision Importantly, DFID is recognised as London that is rooted in poverty reduction. a world leader on aid quality and All Official Development Assistance ranks highly on lists measuring donor (ODA) spending departments should performance. Yet despite progress, conform with the primacy of poverty the number of people living in extreme reduction.” poverty globally remains stubbornly Stephen Twigg, Former MP and former Chair of high in low income countries where the Commons Select Committee for Interna- poverty, hunger, gender and income tional Development inequality, poor health, environmental degradation and many other problems The session was opened with remain enormous challenges. Aid alone a powerful case for investing in will not be able to drive progress to development and considering the meet the 17 SDG goals by 2020. essential building blocks of a credible and effective aid policy for the UK. Further, the changing political environment, impact of Brexit, attacks The participants were reminded of on the 0.7% commitment and the the journey that the Department for breakdown of cross-party consensus International Development (DFID) has on foreign aid means we are facing made since it was set up in 1997 with its more challenges. core purpose of reducing poverty and 8 PwC’s 11th International Development Conference summary report The UK’s position in a The conclusion of a recent International The IDC works with the Independent changing world Development Committee (IDC) report on Commission for Aid Impact to oversee Rather than renouncing its current aid ODA, noted that “unilateral action by the UK aid. In the IDC’s inquiries a spotlight commitments, the UK should use its UK to develop and use its own definition is shone on the programmes that global weight to press other donors to would be an own goal”. The UK’s contribute to the reduction of poverty, meet them too. The UK’s commitment reputation as a leading development including the difference which the UK’s to 0.7% contributes significantly to the actor stems from its expertise and international development work makes UK’s global influence and ’soft power’. professionalism, its commitment to around the world. multilateralism and the international DFID’s strong multilateral partnerships system and its commitment to, and In a recent inquiry, it was revealed help expand the reach of UK delivery against, the 0.7% target, Twigg that there are over 20 million internally development to mobilise significant said. All three of these assets would be displaced people, including refugees resources and expertise to tackle damaged by trying to manipulate the in Africa – half of them are children. global challenges. The UK’s multilateral shared understanding of what aid is. By 2030, 80% of the poorest people in partnerships ensure that UK aid reaches the world will live in fragile and conflict more people, saves more lives and lifts Dealing with public affected countries; and climate change more countries out of poverty. attitudes to aid will only exacerbate There is evidence, however, that this situation. For many states, development is their the public is not convinced by the If these challenges are to be tackled top priority within the United Nations arguments for maintaining the and the SDGs met, the UK must (UN). Former UK Ambassador to the commitment to 0.7%. In a recent Aid maintain a vision that is rooted in UN, Sir Mark Lyall Grant, was cited on Attitudes Tracker (AAT) survey, 34% of poverty reduction. All ODA spending how crucial the foreign aid commitment respondents agreed that government departments should conform with the is for the UK to demonstrate “evidence should give aid “to help people in poor primacy of poverty reduction, with DFID of real intent to be a global power”. countries most in need”, with a further overseeing all ODA spending. Reducing the UK’s commitment to 24% agreeing that government should To row back on its commitments to international development would give aid “based on our own interests 0.7% and mutilateralism, DFID would therefore diminish the UK’s international and others’ needs equally.’’ Only 11% risk undoing years of experience and status, at a time when it is going agreed that government should give expertise. It would also harm the through its biggest post-war foreign aid “to promote the UK’s business and UK’s global standing and let down policy challenge. strategic interests.” UK taxpayers who rightly expect aid The 0.7% commitment helps to create At a time when the UK needs all the spending to be determined by evidence the conditions necessary for the private more to satisfy the public that its of effectiveness. But most importantly, sector to invest the kind of sums expenditure represents good value for it would let down the world’s poorest needed to achieve the SDGs. Billions money and is effective, decisions about people who we have pledged not to in investments from donor countries how to spend aid through multilaterals, leave behind. are necessary to pull in the trillions that DFID or other government departments, are required to meet the huge global should be based on evidence of their challenges that we face. relative effectiveness. With the aid budget divided among This requires a continued commitment various government departments – with to transparency, openness to scrutiny DFID spending approximately 70% and a responsiveness to criticism of the total – it is important to uphold across all parts of government that the highest standards when it comes spend ODA. It is absolutely right that to ODA. Failure to pay attention to the UK government should be held this might create risks in three areas: accountable for its aid spending. As coherence, transparency and the focus in all areas of public expenditure, the on poverty reduction. British people are right to expect value for money. Keeping DFID as an independent department is key to ensuring that all More myth-busting is required and work UK aid is poverty-focused, effective and needs to be done to articulate the value transparent. The attempt to change the of the money that’s spent on aid. For current definition of ODA as determined every £100 made in the UK, only 70p by the Organisation for Economic Co- goes towards foreign aid.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ministerial Appointments, July 2018
    Ministerial appointments, July 2018 Department Secretary of State Permanent Secretary PM The Rt Hon Theresa May MP The Rt Hon Brandon Lewis MP James Cleverly MP (Deputy Gavin Barwell (Chief of Staff) (Party Chairman) Party Chairman) Cabinet Office The Rt Hon David Lidington The Rt Hon Andrea Leadsom The Rt Hon Brandon Lewis MP Oliver Dowden CBE MP Chloe Smith MP (Parliamentary John Manzoni (Chief Exec of Sir Jeremy Heywood CBE MP (Chancellor of the MP (Lord President of the (Minister without portolio) (Parliamentary Secretary, Secretary, Minister for the the Civil Service) (Head of the Civil Duchy of Lancaster and Council and Leader of the HoC) Minister for Implementation) Constitution) Service, Cabinet Minister for the Cabinet Office) Secretary) Treasury (HMT) The Rt Hon Philip Hammond The Rt Hon Elizabeth Truss MP The Rt Hon Mel Stride MP John Glen MP (Economic Robert Jenrick MP (Exchequer Tom Scholar MP (Chief Secretary to the (Financial Secretary to the Secretary to the Treasury) Secretary to the Treasury) Treasury) Treasury) Ministry of Housing, The Rt Hon James Brokenshire Kit Malthouse MP (Minister of Jake Berry MP (Parliamentary Rishi Sunak (Parliamentary Heather Wheeler MP Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth Nigel Adams (Parliamentary Melanie Dawes CB Communities & Local MP State for Housing) Under Secretary of State and Under Secretary of State, (Parliamentary Under Secretary (Parliamentary Under Secretary Under Secretary of State) Government (MHCLG) Minister for the Northern Minister for Local Government) of State, Minister for Housing of State and Minister for Faith) Powerhouse and Local Growth) and Homelessness) Jointly with Wales Office) Business, Energy & Industrial The Rt Hon Greg Clark MP The Rt Hon Claire Perry MP Sam Gyimah (Minister of State Andrew Griffiths MP Richard Harrington MP The Rt Hon Lord Henley Alex Chisholm Strategy (BEIS) (Minister of State for Energy for Universities, Science, (Parliamentary Under Secretary (Parliamentary Under Secretary (Parliamentary Under Secretary and Clean Growth) Research and Innovation).
    [Show full text]
  • The United Nations at 70 Witness Seminar 3
    The United Nations at 70 witness seminar 3 The UN and international peace and security: navigating a divided world? ~British perspectives and experiences~ Wednesday 13 January 2016, Hoare Memorial Hall, Church House, Westminster INTRODUCTION TO SEMINAR SERIES To mark the UN’s 70th anniversary this year, the British Association of Former UN Civil Servants (BAFUNCS) and United Nations Association – UK (UNA-UK) are organising three witness seminars to draw on the experience of British citizens who have worked for the UN over the past seven decades. The purpose of the seminar series is to provide recommendations for UK action to increase the effectiveness of the UN, at a time when the need for the UN is more urgent but the international system is under increasing strain. Our partners for the seminar series are: All Souls College, Oxford; the Bodleian Library, Oxford; Institute of Development Studies, Sussex; King’s College London; and the Overseas Development Institute. The UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO) and Department for International Development (DFID) have generously provided funding for the series. The events take the form of ‘witness seminars’ that will capture the experiences of senior individuals, in particular British citizens, who have worked for or with the UN system at the headquarters and country level. They will serve as a record of testimony, providing a long-term perspective on UN issues and contributing to knowledge and understanding of the UK’s evolving role within the Organisation. UN scholars, practitioners, policy-makers, civil servants and students will be invited to attend and contribute. The first two seminars have already taken place: Witness seminar 1; The UK and the UN in development cooperation, held at the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex on 13-14th May 2015; Witness seminar 2; The UK and the UN in humanitarian action, held at the Weston (Bodleian) Library, University of Oxford, on 16 October 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Witness Seminar 3: Peace and Security B.3.1 Overview Michael Askwith 1,2
    B.3 Witness Seminar 3: Peace and Security B.3.1 Overview Michael Askwith 1,2 WS3 took place at in the Hoare Room, Church House, Westminster, on 13 January 2016 to commemorate the 70th Anniversary of the first preparatory meeting of the UN Security Council, which took place in the same room on 17 January 1946. Organised by the United Nations Association-UK (UNA-UK), with support from the British Association of Former United Nations Civil Servants (BAFUNCS), King’s College London and the Bodleian Library, Oxford, with funding from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), it sought to collect testimony from current and former British professionals who have worked in or with the UN System throughout the organisation’s lifespan. The anniversary provided an opportunity for those involved in or with the UN System to reflect how the organisation had stood up to the fluid and diverse political, economic and social challenges of the latter half of the twentieth century and the early twenty-first century. Specifically, the seminar considered the UK’s record on the UN Security Council and the council’s activities to prevent and resolve conflict, as well as to keep peace. It proceeded in four sessions that were designed to draw on participants’ insights and provide lessons and recommendations for the future: ● Session 1: The UK on the Security Council: assessing the record after 70 years ● Session 2: Prevention and early action ● Session 3: Peacekeeping and peace-building ● Session 4: Lessons and recommendations from seven decades in international
    [Show full text]
  • Witness Seminar 3 the United Nations and International Peace and Security
    The United Nations at 70 - Witness seminar 3 The United Nations and international peace and security: Navigating a divided world? British perspectives Programme 1000-1015 Welcome and introduction Mr Edward Mortimer CMG, President of the British Association of Former United Nations Civil Servants (BAFUNCS) 1015-1130 Session 1: The UK on the Security Council: Assessing the Record after 70 Years Chair: Dame Glynne Evans Panellist 1: Ambassador Matthew Rycroft, UK Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York Panellist 2: Mr Andrew Whitley, Policy and Advocacy Director, The Elders Respondent 1: Mr Sam Daws, Director, Project on UN Governance and Reform, Centre for International Studies, Oxford University Respondent 2: Mr Yves Doutriaux, former Deputy Permanent Representative of France to the UN 1130-1145 Refreshment break 1145-1300 Session 2: Prevention and early action Chair: Professor Dominik Zaum, University of Reading Panellist 1: Lord Williams of Baglan, Distinguished Visiting Fellow, Chatham House Panellist 2: Sir Kieran Prendergast Respondent 1: Dr Jennifer Welsh, UN Special Adviser for the Responsibility to Protect Respondent 2: Dr Francesc Vendrell, former UN Mediator at the Department of Political Affairs 1 The United Nations at 70 - Witness seminar 3 13 January 2016, Church House, London 1300-1400 Lunch 1400-1515 Session 3: Peacekeeping and peacebuilding Chair: Professor Mats Berdal, King's College London Panellist 1: Dr Babu Rahman, Deputy Head of Research Analysts, Multilateral Policy Directorate, Foreign and Commonwealth
    [Show full text]
  • The Uk and Un Peace Operations: a Case for Greater Engagement
    May 2016 THE UK AND UN PEACE OPERATIONS: A CASE FOR GREATER ENGAGEMENT David Curran and Paul D. Williams OxfordResearchGroup | The UK and UN Peace Operations: A Case for Greater Engagement May 2016 Executive Summary In mid-1995, Britain provided over 10,000 United Nations (UN) peacekeepers, more than any other country in the world. By 1996 this number had plummeted to a few hundred and has been consistently below 400 since 2005. In September 2015 Prime Minister David Cameron announced that the UK would deploy up to 370 British troops to UN-mandated peace operations in Somalia and South Sudan, more than doubling the UK’s personnel commitment to UN- mandated operations. Combined with the withdrawal of UK forces from Afghanistan, the release of the 2015 Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR), and the UK’s hosting of the next Leaders’ Summit on Peacekeeping in September 2016, this decision has intensified debates about whether and how the UK should increase its participation in UN peace operations. This report reflects on how UN peace operations could be integrated into UK foreign policy and makes a case for why Britain should enhance its participation in UN peace operations. Currently, the UK contributes to UN peace operations in four main ways: It influences the strategic direction of operations through its permanent membership of the UN Security Council; It is one of the largest financial contributors to the UN peacekeeping budget; It helps build the capacity of other troop- and police-contributing countries; and It deploys a small number of its own uniformed personnel to UN missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and the Rule of Law
    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Global Britain: Human rights and the rule of law Thirteenth Report of Session 2017–19 HC 874 House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Global Britain: Human rights and the rule of law Thirteenth Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 5 September 2018 HC 874 Published on 11 September 2018 by authority of the House of Commons The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Tom Tugendhat MP (Conservative, Tonbridge and Malling) (Chair) Ian Austin MP (Labour, Dudley North) Chris Bryant MP (Labour, Rhondda) Ann Clwyd MP (Labour, Cynon Valley) Mike Gapes MP (Labour (Co-op), Ilford South) Stephen Gethins MP (Scottish National Party, North East Fife) Ian Murray MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Priti Patel MP (Conservative, Witham) Andrew Rosindell MP (Conservative, Romford) Mr Bob Seely MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) Royston Smith MP (Conservative, Southampton, Itchen) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Ms Nusrat Ghani MP and Nadhim Zahawi MP Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/facom and in print by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Department for International Development Annual Report and Accounts 2019-20
    Department for International Development Annual Report and Accounts 2019-20 HC 517 Department for International Development Annual Report and Accounts 2019‑20 Annual Report presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 1 of the International Development (Reporting and Transparency) Act 2006 Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Accounts presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 14 July 2020 HC 517 1 © Crown copyright 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open‑government‑licence/ version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official‑documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] This is part of a series of departmental publications which, along with the Main Estimates 2020‑21 and the document Public Expenditure: Statistical Analyses 2019, present the government’s outturn for 2019‑20 and planned expenditure for 2020‑21 ISBN 978‑1‑5286‑1866‑3 CCS0320348248 07/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Contents Section 1: Performance Report 5 Overview 5 Foreword
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Support Cbms
    26-9 Dongsung 3-gil, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03085, Republic of Korea T. +82-2-765-9731 F. +82-2-741-8564 E. [email protected] H. www.ccej.or.kr To: Permanent Member States of the UN Security Council* From: Citizens’ Coalition for Economic Justice† Letter to support CBMs at the January 18 Special session of the UNSC January 17, 2018 Dear President/Prime Minister, The past years saw that, though the successful treaties of the Confidence Building Measures to nuclear- weapons-free zone and disarmament and non-proliferation; playing a leading role in arms control dynamic, and progressing in comprehensive cooperation, or advancing toward a nuclear-weapon-free- world, there was not a substantive effort. We are, lamenting this history, as well as alarmed at the recent nuclear tensions and political conflicts between nuclear-armed countries, and at the increasing risk of nuclear weapons used by accident, miscalculation or intent as a result. Any use of nuclear weapons would have catastrophic human, economic and environmental consequences. The use of just a small fraction of the 14,000 nuclear weapons in the world’s stockpiles could end civilization as we know it. On January 18, the United Nations Security Council will hold the special session on the theme, “Weapons of Mass Destruction and Confidence Building Measures (CBMs).” This theme will be chaired by Kazakhstan President Nazarbayev, who has put forward a number of proposals to the United Nations, including a call “on all Member States, especially the Security Council’s members to set a goal of ridding the world of nuclear weapons by the UN’s 100th Anniversary in 2045.” On December 24, 2017, in addition, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 72/251 setting the dates and mandate for a High-Level Conference on Nuclear Disarmament to take place at the UN from May 14-16, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report & Accounts: 2015 - 2016
    Annual Report & Accounts: 2015 - 2016 Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report and Accounts 2015–16 (For the year ended 31 March 2016) Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Annual Report presented to the House of Commons by Command of Her Majesty Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 20 July 2016 HC 336 © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Finance Directorate, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH Print ISBN 9781474131315 Web ISBN 9781474131322 ID P002807725 07/16 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Designed in-house by the FCO Communication Directorate Contents Contents Foreword by the Foreign Secretary ......................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Section 15.1 Civilian Personnel
    SECTION 15.1 CIVILIAN PERSONNEL Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................. 245 Civilian outreach event .......................................................................................... 245 Pre‑invasion planning and preparation ........................................................................ 246 ORHA ..................................................................................................................... 247 DFID humanitarian advisers .................................................................................. 249 The British Embassy Baghdad .............................................................................. 250 MOD civilian support to Op TELIC ......................................................................... 252 UK civilian presence during the Coalition Occupation of Iraq ...................................... 255 UK civilian deployments to ORHA ......................................................................... 255 The CPA and the return to a “war footing” ............................................................. 263 The impact of deteriorating security ....................................................................... 272 The British Offices in Baghdad and Basra ............................................................. 291 Preparations for the transfer of sovereignty ........................................................... 294 The post‑CPA UK civilian presence in Iraq
    [Show full text]
  • British Prime Minister Tony Blair's Decision to Go to War in Iraq
    BRITISH PRIME MINISTER TONY BLAIR’ S DECISION TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ: AN EVALUATION OF MOTIVATING FACTORS Kimberly LaCoco, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2009 APPROVED: Denis Paz, Major Professor Randolf Campbell, Committee Member Gustav Seligmann, Committee Member Richard McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Michael Monticino, Interim Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies LaCoco, Kimberly. British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s Decision to Go to War in Iraq: An Evaluation of Motivating Factors. Master of Science (History), May 2009, 136 pp., bibliography, 120 titles. Blair sent British troops to join U.S. forces in the invasion of Iraq in 2003 at great political cost to himself. What motivated him to take this step? Sources for this work include: autobiographies and biographies of individuals close to Blair; journal and newspaper articles and monographs on this topic; Prime Minister’s speeches and press conferences. Part one is comprised of five chapters including the Introduction; Blair’s years at school; Blair’s early political career; and From Parliament to Prime Minister. Part two includes four chapters that analyze motivating factors such as, Anglo-American Relations; Blair’s personality, faith, and his relationship with Gordon Brown; and finally, Blair’s perception of Britain’s Manifest Destiny. All of these factors played a role in Blair’s decision. Copyright 2009 by Kimberly LaCoco ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to gratefully acknowledge the assistance I received from Professor Emeritus Sir Brian Harrison who has recently published Seeking a Role: The United Kingdom 1951-1970.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Intelligence & WMD: Reports, Politics, and Intelligence Failures: the Case
    The Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 29, No. 1, 3 – 52, February 2006 INTELLIGENCE & WMD Reports, Politics, and Intelligence Failures: The Case of Iraq ROBERT JERVIS1 Columbia University, New York ABSTRACT The intelligence failure concerning Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD) has been the center of political controversy and official investigations in three countries. This article reviews the Report on the U.S. Intelligence Community’s Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 7 July 2004, Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction, a Report of a Committee of Privy Councillors to the House of Commons, 14 July 2004 (the Butler Report), Report to the President of the United States, The Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction, 31 March 2005. It explores the reasons for their deficiencies and the failure itself. This case and the investigations of it are similar to many previous ones. The investigations are marred by political bias and excessive hindsight. Neither the investigations nor contemporary intelligence on Iraqi WMD followed good social science practices. The comparative method was not utilized, confirmation bias was rampant, alternative hypotheses were not tested, and negative evidence was ignored. Although the opportunities to do better are many, the prospects for adequate reform are dim. KEY WORDS: intelligence, intelligence failures, Iraqi WMD, official inquiries 1Truth in reviewing requires me to say that I chair the CIA’s Historical Review Panel which advises the Director on declassification policies and priorities, wrote a post- mortem for the CIA on why it was slow to see that the Shah of Iran might fall that located a number of errors which recurred in the Iraq case (‘Analysis of NFAC’s Performance on Iran’s Domestic Crisis, Mid-1977–November 1978’, declassified as CIA-RDP86B00269R001100110003-4), and led a small team that analyzed the lessons of the Iraq WMD failure.
    [Show full text]