DOCSLIB.ORG

Reintroduction of Greater Indian Rhinoceros Into Dudhwa National Park John B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reintroduction of Greater Indian Rhinoceros Into Dudhwa National Park John B The original paper was published in the Journal of the Society for the Preservation of the Wild Fauna of the Empire (1903-1925 and 1926-1950) or in Oryx, the journal of Fauna and Flora International (from 1951). The website of the journal is (from 2008): http://www.oryxthejournal.org/ The PDF is reproduced with permission from the CD version of The Centenary Archive 1903-2003, a fully searchable database of 100 years of the publications of Fauna and Flora International. More information on: http://www.fauna-flora.org/ The Society was founded in 1903 as the Society for the Preservation of the Wild Fauna of the Empire, and subsequently named the Fauna and Flora Preservation Society. Fauna & Flora International is conserving the planet’s threatened species and ecosystems – with the people and communities who depend on them. Oryx - The International Journal of Conservation, is now published quarterly by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International. It is a leading scientific journal of biodiversity conservation, conservation policy and sustainable use, with a particular interest in material that has the potential to improve conservation management and practice. The website, http://www.oryxthejournal.org/, plays a vital role in the journal’s capacity-building work. Amongst the site’s many attributes is a compendium of sources of free software for researchers and details of how to access Oryx at reduced rates or for free in developing countries. The website also includes extracts from Oryx issues 10, 25 and 50 years ago, and a gallery of research photographs that provide a fascinating insight into the places, species and people described in the journal. The Rhino Resource Center posted this PDF in June 2009. We are grateful for the permission. Reintroduction of greater Indian rhinoceros into Dudhwa National Park John B. Sale and Samar Singh The range of the endangered greater Indian rhinoceros is now restricted to a few isolated pockets. One of the conservation measures recommended for the species is the establishment of additional viable populations in suitable areas. The authors describe an attempt to do this in Dudhwa National Park in Uttar Pradesh, India. The original distribution of the greater Indian valley in Assam (Figure 1). Of the present species rhinoceros Rhinoceros unicomis spanned the population of around 1700, approximately 84 flood plains of the Indus, Ganges and per cent are in Kaziranga and Chitwan National Brahmaputra rivers from the Hindu Kush in the Parks (1080 and 350 rhinos, respectively), most west to the present Indo-Burmese border in the of the rest being scattered in small populations. east. Mainly as a result of habitat loss and over- While numbers have greatly increased in hunting, only a few isolated pockets remain in the Kaziranga since the turn of the century, heavy eastern part of this former range, in the terai of poaching is a chronic problem there and in other Nepal and West Bengal, and the Brahmaputra locations. Other serious conservation hazards include large-scale erosion of habitat due to increased flooding resulting from deforestation of catchment areas and epidemic diseases, the likelihood of which is increased by contact with domestic stock and excessively high rhino densities in some populations (Laurie, 1978). The species is on the ILJCN endangered list. A 1979 report of the SSC Asian Rhino Specialist Group (Schenkel and Schenkel, 1979) emphasized the need for continuous effort in the protection and monitoring of the species, adding that 'steps must be envisaged to establish additional viable population units in suitable areas, preferably in the rhino's former distribution ^Distribution of great Indian range'. ^rhinoceros circg 1500 AD • Main existing populations In 1979 the Indian Board for Wildlife set up a o Remtroduced population committee, under the chairmanship of the senior author, to examine the conservation status of the rhino in India and, if appropriate, to make recommendations for the establishment of several new populations. After field visits to a Figure 1. Map showing past and present distribution of the number of possible reintroduction sites and a greater Indian rhinoceros. careful examination of the existing rhino situation Reintroduction of greater Indian rhinoceros 81 in Assam, the Committee (Sale, 1981) recom- tected against accidental escape by the con- mended a trial translocatiori of six animals into struction of a rhino-proof trench outside the Dudhwa National Park in the terai zone of electric fence. Holding stockades for the new northern Uttar Pradesh. Dudhwa offered the arrivals were built within the fenced zone, and essential prerequisites of swampy grassland Dudhwa field staff were sent to Assam for training habitat under the protection of a well-managed in rhino management. national park. Moreover, there are reports of rhinos in the Dudhwa area within the last 100 The 1984 translocation from Assam years. The suitability of Dudhwa was confirmed Early in 1984 a group of about 10 rhinos living by Professor Dr R. Schenkel, Chairman of the outside Pobitara Sanctuary was selected by the SSC Asian Rhino Specialist Group, after a visit to Assam Forest Department for the capture oper- the park in 1980/81 (Schenkel, 1983). ation. The fact that these rhinos were causing In order to ascertain that the park would provide considerable damage to cultivated crops and adequate food for a rhino population, the Com- proving difficult to protect adequately (a large mittee commissioned a survey of rhino food adult was poached while the capture team was in plants in the proposed reintroduction area by the the area) provided enhanced justification for the Botanical Survey of India (Hajra and Shukla, translocation experiment. However, such a small 1982). It was estimated that this 90-sq-km area target population limited scope for the selection of could support an ultimate maximum number of six young adult individuals, which would have 90 rhinos. In addition, there are other areas of constituted ideal candidates for withstanding the good rhino habitat in Dudhwa National Park. stresses of capture and translocation. Between 11 and 21 March 1984, six animals were cap- In view of the fact that there was very little tured by drug immobilization. They were crated, experience of modern capture methods with the revived, transported to stockades a few kilo- greater Indian rhinoceros in the wild, experi- metres from the capture area and released. After mental capture using drug immobilization was release the animals were encouraged to wallow, carried out in Assam during 1980 (Sale and and in most cases satisfactory feeding was estab- Woodford, 1981). These trials established drug lished within two to three days. Necessary health dosages, handling and transport procedures for care, mostly consisting of treatment of superficial the proposed translocation operation. lacerations received during capture, was In order to prevent released rhinos from rendered by a team of three veterinarians. The wandering out of Dudhwa into adjacent culti- first animal captured, a large male, escaped from vation and to assist their initial establishment in its stockade during the night. optimal habitat, a 27-sq-km area was enclosed by On 30 March the five remaining animals (a sub- a two-strand electric fence. A 9-km critical section adult and two elderly females; a young adult and near the park boundary was additionally pro- one older male) were crated, driven in trucks to 82 Oryx Vol 21 No 2, April 1987 Far left: Immobilized rhino on sledge being pulled across river (J.B. Sale and S. Singh). Left: Rhino being released from stockade at Dudhwa reintroduction site (Shanthini Daw son). Right: Large male rhino from Assam being fitted with a radio-collar before release in Dudhwa (Shanthlni Dawson). Guwahati Airport and loaded into an Aeroflot animals with the totally unrelated Assam males IL76 cargo aircraft chartered by the Government would ensure maximum genetic vigour. of India. Three of the animals were lightly sedated prior to loading and they all remained calm during Capture took place on 28-31 March 1985 in the two-and-a-half-hour flight from Guwahati to Sauraha just north of Chitwan National Park. All New Delhi. After food and water at Delhi Airport, four animals, estimated to be between 5 and 7 the rhinos were driven through the night to years old, were immobilized and sledged into Dudhwa National Park, where they were un- crates in which they were revived. They were crated into individual stockades. One female died immediately driven 720 km to Dudhwa, and all after 11 days, but the remaining four settled well; withstood the 24-hour journey well and, with the three were released from the stockades on 20 exception of the first arrival, which broke out April and the large male was released on 9 May, during its first night, quickly settled in the Dudhwa after being fitted with a radio collar. stockades. They were released into the wild after a week. The 1985 translocation from Nepal Survival To establish a vigorous breeding nucleus of Of the total of nine rhinos translocated to rhinos in Dudhwa, it was decided to introduce Dudhwa, seven survive in excellent health at the more stock from a different population. The time of writing (December, 1986) and have collaboration of His Majesty's Government of settled well in the area enclosed by the electric Nepal was obtained in the exchange of four fence. These consist of the young female and young adult female rhinos, from around the area both males of the 1984 introduction from Assam, of Chitwan National Park, for 16 domesticated and all four young adult females of the 1985 Indian elephants. By selecting only females, the group from Nepal. reproductive potential in Dudhwa would be more The two elderly females from Assam both died than doubled and eventual mating of these after their arrival in Dudhwa.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Parks in India (State Wise)
    National Parks in India (State Wise) Andaman and Nicobar Islands Rani Jhansi Marine National Park Campbell Bay National Park Galathea National Park Middle Button Island National Park Mount Harriet National Park South Button Island National Park Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park North Button Island National ParkSaddle Peak National Park Andhra Pradesh Papikonda National Park Sri Venkateswara National Park Arunachal Pradesh Mouling National Park Namdapha National Park Assam Dibru-Saikhowa National Park Orang National Park Manas National Park (UNESCO World Heritage Centre) Nameri National Park Kaziranga National Park (Famous for Indian Rhinoceros, UNESCO World Heritage Centre) Bihar Valmiki National Park Chhattisgarh Kanger Ghati National Park Guru Ghasidas (Sanjay) National Park Indravati National Park Goa Mollem National Park Gujarat Marine National Park, Gulf of Kutch Vansda National Park Blackbuck National Park, Velavadar Gir Forest National Park Haryana WWW.BANKINGSHORTCUTS.COM WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/BANKINGSHORTCUTS 1 National Parks in India (State Wise) Kalesar National Park Sultanpur National Park Himachal Pradesh Inderkilla National Park Khirganga National Park Simbalbara National Park Pin Valley National Park Great Himalayan National Park Jammu and Kashmir Salim Ali National Park Dachigam National Park Hemis National Park Kishtwar National Park Jharkhand Hazaribagh National Park Karnataka Rajiv Gandhi (Rameswaram) National Park Nagarhole National Park Kudremukh National Park Bannerghatta National Park (Bannerghatta Biological Park)
    [Show full text]
  • Cop18 Prop. 51
    Original language: English CoP18 Prop. 51 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Eighteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Colombo (Sri Lanka), 23 May – 3 June 2019 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal The proponents propose delisting of Dalbergia sissoo DC., from CITES Appendix II as it does not meet the listing criteria set out in Article II [(paragraphs 2(a)]of the Convention text or the criteria laid down in Annex 2(a) of Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP17). The species is widely distributed and in India it is found abundantly in wild and on cultivation as well. The species has very fast growth rate and capacity to become naturalized outside of its native range, even it is invasive in some parts of the world. The regulation of trade in the species is not necessary to avoid it becoming eligible for inclusion in Appendix I in the near future and the harvest of specimens from the wild is not reducing the wild population to a level at which its survival might be threatened by continued harvesting or other influences. B. Proponent Bangladesh, Bhutan, India and Nepal*: C. Supporting statement 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Magnoliopsida 1.2 Order: Fabales 1.3 Familly: Fabaceae 1.4 Genus, species or subspecies, including author and year: DalbergiaL. f.1781 [1782] 1.5 Scientific synonyms: Amerimnon sissoo (Roxb. ex DC.) Kuntze 1.6 Common names: English: Indian rosewood, Himalaya raintree, Indian Dalbergia, Penny leaf tree, Sisso French: Spanish: 1.7 Code numbers: Not available 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Areas in News
    Protected Areas in News National Parks in News ................................................................Shoolpaneswar................................ (Dhum- khal)................................ Wildlife Sanctuary .................................... 3 ................................................................... 11 About ................................................................................................Point ................................Calimere Wildlife Sanctuary................................ ...................................... 3 ......................................................................................... 11 Kudremukh National Park ................................................................Tiger Reserves................................ in News................................ ....................................................................... 3 ................................................................... 13 Nagarhole National Park ................................................................About................................ ......................................................................................................................................... 3 .................................................................... 14 Rajaji National Park ................................................................................................Pakke tiger reserve................................................................................. 3 ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation, Conflict, and Community Context: Insights from Indian Tiger Reserves
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations December 2019 Conservation, Conflict, and Community Context: Insights from Indian Tiger Reserves Devyani Singh Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Singh, Devyani, "Conservation, Conflict, and Community Context: Insights from Indian Tiger Reserves" (2019). All Dissertations. 2534. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/2534 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONSERVATION, CONFLICT, AND COMMUNITY CONTEXT: INSIGHTS FROM INDIAN TIGER RESERVES A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management by Devyani Singh December 2019 Accepted by: Dr. Robert B. Powell, Committee Chair Dr. Lincoln R. Larson, Co-Chair Dr. Lawrence Allen Dr. Brett Wright ABSTRACT Protected areas across the world have been established to preserve landscapes and conserve biodiversity. However, they also are crucial resources for nearby human populations who depend on them for subsistence and to fulfill social, economic, religious, and cultural needs. The contrasting ideologies of park use and conservation among diverse stakeholders (e.g. managers and local communities) make protected areas spaces of conflict. This mixed-methods study aimed to gain a deeper, more comprehensive understanding of these complex conflicts and potential solutions by focusing on the social and ecological landscapes surrounding two Indian protected areas: Dudhwa National Park (DNP in Uttar Pradesh) and Ranthambore National Park (RNP, in Rajasthan).
    [Show full text]
  • List of National Parks in India
    www.gradeup.co List of National Parks in India Protected areas of India • These are defined according to the guidelines prescribed by IUCN (The International Union for Conservation of Nature). • There are mainly four types of protected areas which are- (a) National Park (b) Wildlife Sanctuaries (c) Conservation reserves (d) Community reserves (a) National Park • Classified as IUCN category II • Any area notified by state govt to be constituted as a National Park • There are 104 national parks in India. • First national park in India- Jim Corbett National Park (previously known as Hailey National Park) • No human activity/ rights allowed except for the ones permitted by the Chief Wildlife Warden of the state. • It covered 1.23 Percent geographical area of India (b) Wildlife Sanctuaries • Classified as IUCN category II • Any area notified by state govt to be constituted as a wildlife sanctuary. • Certain rights are available to the people. Example- grazing etc. • There are 543 wildlife sanctuaries in India. • It covered 3.62 Percent geographical area of India (c) Conservation reserves • These categories added in Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Act of 2002. • Buffer zones between established national parks, wildlife sanctuaries and reserved and protected forests of India. • Uninhabited and completely owned by the Government. • It covered 0.08 Percent geographical area of India (d) Community reserves • These categories added in Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Act of 2002. • Buffer zones between established national parks, wildlife sanctuaries and reserved and protected forests of India. • Used for subsistence by communities and community areas because part of the land is privately owned. • It covered 0.002 Percent geographical area of India Act related to wildlife 1 www.gradeup.co • Wildlife Protection Act 1972 • It is applicable to whole India except Jammu and Kashmir which have their own law for wildlife protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Dudhwa, Katarniaghat
    Dudhwa, Katarniaghat Those two Indian reserves are situated in Uttar Pradesh state on the border with Nepal. In the paste they were connected each to other and constituted part of so called Western Terai Landscape Complex. That reach and diverse environment has been heavily logged and settled both in India and Nepal in last forty years. As a result very few forest are now left outside the reserves. Fortunately both Indian sanctuaries are still connected with Nepali national parks of Suklapantha (Dudhwa) and Bardia (Katarniaghat). Maintaining corridors between those protected areas is crucial for their survival and constitute one of the main goals of the WWF Terai landscape project. The status of Dudhwa and Katarniaghat is different as first is gazetted as national park and tiger reserve whilst the later is listed as wildlife reserve. The gazettment of Katarniaghat as tiger reserve and national park is one of the steps that Indian authorities should undertake quickly in order to save the place. The next step could be the creation of the large transnational ‘peace park’ connecting two reserves in India (Dudhwa, Katarniaghat) and two in Nepal (Bardia and Suklapanta). Both Indian reserves are under constant pressure from growing rural population and poaching. Forest are being encroached and grazed by feral and domestic cattle. Firewood is being collected by local population. Many cars and trains pass daily trough sanctuaries. Environmental authorities as well as several NGO’s are struggling to close railroads crosscutting Katarniaghat and Dudhwa which are blamed to bring poachers and wood collectors deep inside the forest as well as killing wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kaziranga National Park: Dynamics of Social and Political History
    [Downloaded free from http://www.conservationandsociety.org on Monday, April 05, 2010] Conservation and Society 7(2): 113-129, 2009 Article The Kaziranga National Park: Dynamics of Social and Political History Arupjyoti Saikia Associate Professor in History, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781 039, India E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Almost after a century of experimenting, Kaziranga National Park is now a well-known example of the success of wildlife conservation. Conservationists have no hesitation in ascribing the success of this story to the careful application of the science of wildlife conservation. A large section of the Assamese middle class would like to associate the institution as organic to their success story. For the state too it is a matter of pride. This journey of success is not a linear growth of success and a re-look into the social and political history of this national park will help us understand the complexities underlying these claims. The ideological paradigms of wildlife conservation in Kaziranga National Park have changed significantly over a long period. Since its establishment as a game sanctuary in the early twentieth century and gradually being given the status of a national park, Kaziranga has experienced varied forms of conservation agenda. Rather than a mere technological explanation for the success of the conservation project of Kaziranga, more of it was based on the social and political history. Keywords: Kaziranga, game sanctuary, rhino, agrarian practices, traditional hunting, nationalism, Assam DOI: 10.4103/0972-4923.58643 INTRODUCTION ‘militarised life style’, not only reinforced a sense of superiority over Indians, but also imbued a distinct set of class values.
    [Show full text]
  • GAYATRI's I N S T I T U T E 1St Puliya C.H.B, Main Chopasni Road, Jodhpur. 9119119781 Page 1
    Number Square Cube Square Root Cubic Root Number Square Cube Square Root Cubic Root x2 x3 x1/2 x1/3 x2 x3 x1/2 x1/3 1 1 1 1.000 1.000 61 3721 226981 7.810 3.936 2 4 8 1.414 1.260 62 3844 238328 7.874 3.958 3 9 27 1.732 1.442 63 3969 250047 7.937 3.979 4 16 64 2.000 1.587 64 4096 262144 8.000 4.000 5 25 125 2.236 1.710 65 4225 274625 8.062 4.021 6 36 216 2.449 1.817 66 4356 287496 8.124 4.041 7 49 343 2.646 1.913 67 4489 300763 8.185 4.062 8 64 512 2.828 2.000 68 4624 314432 8.246 4.082 9 81 729 3.000 2.080 69 4761 328509 8.307 4.102 10 100 1000 3.162 2.154 70 4900 343000 8.367 4.121 11 121 1331 3.317 2.224 71 5041 357911 8.426 4.141 12 144 1728 3.464 2.289 72 5184 373248 8.485 4.160 13 169 2197 3.606 2.351 73 5329 389017 8.544 4.179 14 196 2744 3.742 2.410 74 5476 405224 8.602 4.198 15 225 3375 3.873 2.466 75 5625 421875 8.660 4.217 16 256 4096 4.000 2.520 76 5776 438976 8.718 4.236 17 289 4913 4.123 2.571 77 5929 456533 8.775 4.254 18 324 5832 4.243 2.621 78 6084 474552 8.832 4.273 19 361 6859 4.359 2.668 79 6241 493039 8.888 4.291 20 400 8000 4.472 2.714 80 6400 512000 8.944 4.309 21 441 9261 4.583 2.759 81 6561 531441 9.000 4.327 22 484 10648 4.690 2.802 82 6724 551368 9.055 4.344 23 529 12167 4.796 2.844 83 6889 571787 9.110 4.362 24 576 13824 4.899 2.884 84 7056 592704 9.165 4.380 25 625 15625 5.000 2.924 85 7225 614125 9.220 4.397 26 676 17576 5.099 2.962 86 7396 636056 9.274 4.414 27 729 19683 5.196 3.000 87 7569 658503 9.327 4.431 28 784 21952 5.292 3.037 88 7744 681472 9.381 4.448 29 841 24389 5.385 3.072 89 7921 704969 9.434
    [Show full text]
  • Ashish Kothari Project Director
    JPAM UPDATE News on Action Towards Joint Protected Area Management No’s 1 -17 September 1994 - July 1998 ...\ak\jtmng\update\final\onefile.doc Notes: • This file version does not follow page numbering, page layout, fonts, etc. as they appear in hard copies of the Update • The entire file has been reduced to GeoSlab703 Lt BT font in 10 point. (This will appear as Times New Roman in systems where GeoSlab is not installed) 1 Ashish Kothari Project Director 23 November,1994 Dear Friend, As was decided in our September meeting on Exploring Joint Protected Area Management, we shall be starting with a regular Update to inform you of all the activities being undertaken within the purview of joint or participatory management of protected areas. Enclosed please find the first of these Updates. This Update is based on the information received or gathered by us since the workshop in September. It is possible that we have missed out on other follow-up being carried out by some of you; please inform us immediately so that we can include it in the next Update. Your comments on the Update are also eagerly awaited. Most important, however, PLEASE DO KEEP INFORMING US OF RELATED ACTIVITIES AND ANY OTHER INFORMATION WHICH YOU THINK WOULD BE OF USE TO OTHERS AND WHICH SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN FUTURE ISSUES. Mean while, I hope you have received the notice and invitation to the Protect Forests Protect Forest Dwellers Yatra that some of us are proposing to hold in January-February. If you have not already responded, Please do so immediately, as planning time is very short.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 UTTAR PRADESH: Changing Perspectives
    Knowledge Partner UTTAR PRADESH: Changing Perspectives 1 Title Uttar Pradesh: Changing Perspectives Author MRSS India Date February 2016 Copyright No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form by photo, photo-print, microfilm or any other means without written permission of FICCI and MRSS India Disclaimer The information and opinions contained in this document have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty expressed is made to their accuracy, completeness or correctness. This document is for information purpose only. The information contained in this document is published for the assistance of the recipient but is not to be relied upon as authoritative or taken in substitution for the exercise of judgment by any recipient. This document is not intended to be a substitute for professional, technical or legal advice. All opinions expressed in this document are subject to change without notice. Neither MRSS India and FICCI, nor other legal entities in the group to which they belong, accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss however arising from any use of this document or its contents or otherwise arising in connection herewith. Many of the conclusions and inferences are specific inferences made by MRSS India in their expert capacity specifically in tourism sector and does not have any correlation with financing related outlook that as a research organization may have. Contact FICCI Majestic Research Services and Address Headquarters Solutions
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrients Cycling, Climate, Energy Flow, Etc
    https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Website - https://upscpdf.com https://t.me/UPSC_PDF S28-EnvironmentEcologyPart-1 S29-EnvironmentEcologyPart-2 S30-EnvironmentEcologyPart-3 S31-EnvironmentEcologyPart-4 S32-EnvironmentEcologyPart-5 S33-EnvironmentEcologyPart-6 Website - https://upscpdf.com findfind on on telegram telegram @unacademyplusvideos @unacademyplusvideos https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Website - https://upscpdf.com https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Part - 1 Environment & Ecology Website - https://upscpdf.com findfind on on telegram telegram @unacademyplusvideos @unacademyplusvideos https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Website - https://upscpdf.com https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Topics To Be Discussed I. Ecology II. Ecosystem III. Functions of Ecosystems A. Energy Flow B. Nutrient Cycles C. Ecological Succession D. Homeostasis Website - https://upscpdf.com findfind on on telegram telegram @unacademyplusvideos @unacademyplusvideos https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Website - https://upscpdf.com https://t.me/UPSC_PDF What is Environment? ➢ The environment may be defined as the surroundings or conditions in which an organism lives or operates. ➢ Every living organism is constantly interacting with its environment comprised of air, light, water, land or substratum and the various kinds of living organisms. ➢ The environment broadly includes living and non-living components. ➢ All organisms depend on their environment for survival. Website - https://upscpdf.com findfind on on telegram telegram @unacademyplusvideos @unacademyplusvideos https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Website - https://upscpdf.com https://t.me/UPSC_PDF I. Ecology Website - https://upscpdf.com findfind on on telegram telegram @unacademyplusvideos @unacademyplusvideos https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Website - https://upscpdf.com https://t.me/UPSC_PDF What is Ecology? ➢ Ecology is defined "as a scientific study of the relationship of the living organisms with each other and with their environment." ➢ The term ecology was first coined in 1869 by the German biologist Ernst Haeckel.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Multidisciplinary Research Journal
    Vol 5 Issue 1 Oct 2015 ISSN No : 2249-894X ORIGINAL ARTICLE Monthly Multidisciplinary Research Journal Review Of Research Journal Chief Editors Ashok Yakkaldevi Ecaterina Patrascu A R Burla College, India Spiru Haret University, Bucharest Kamani Perera Regional Centre For Strategic Studies, Sri Lanka Welcome to Review Of Research RNI MAHMUL/2011/38595 ISSN No.2249-894X Review Of Research Journal is a multidisciplinary research journal, published monthly in English, Hindi & Marathi Language. All research papers submitted to the journal will be double - blind peer reviewed referred by members of the editorial Board readers will include investigator in universities, research institutes government and industry with research interest in the general subjects. Regional Editor Dr. T. Manichander Sanjeev Kumar Mishra Advisory Board Kamani Perera Delia Serbescu Mabel Miao Regional Centre For Strategic Studies, Sri Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, Romania Center for China and Globalization, China Lanka Xiaohua Yang Ruth Wolf Ecaterina Patrascu University of San Francisco, San Francisco University Walla, Israel Spiru Haret University, Bucharest Karina Xavier Jie Hao Fabricio Moraes de AlmeidaFederal Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), University of Sydney, Australia University of Rondonia, Brazil USA Pei-Shan Kao Andrea Anna Maria Constantinovici May Hongmei Gao University of Essex, United Kingdom AL. I. Cuza University, Romania Kennesaw State University, USA Romona Mihaila Marc Fetscherin Loredana Bosca Spiru Haret University, Romania Rollins College, USA Spiru Haret University, Romania Liu Chen Beijing Foreign Studies University, China Ilie Pintea Spiru Haret University, Romania Mahdi Moharrampour Nimita Khanna Govind P. Shinde Islamic Azad University buinzahra Director, Isara Institute of Management, New Bharati Vidyapeeth School of Distance Branch, Qazvin, Iran Delhi Education Center, Navi Mumbai Titus Pop Salve R.
    [Show full text]