DOCSLIB.ORG

ATOMISM in ANCIENT MEDICAL HISTORY by R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ATOMISM in ANCIENT MEDICAL HISTORY by R ATOMISM IN ANCIENT MEDICAL HISTORY by R. A. HORNE Science has shown the great circles in which nature works. RALPH WALDO EMERSON THE history of the development of the atomic theory is usually imagined to be the exclusive province of chemistry and physics, and there is a tendency to suppose that molecular biology is one of the most recent products of twentieth- century science. For these reasons it is surprising to discover that the paths of the corpuscular world-view and theoretical physiology crossed more than two thousand years ago and that this encounter resulted, not in a casual and passing acquaintance, but in an important and productive liaison which continued, albeit with interruptions, over a period of twenty centuries. Far from being cloistered academicians the pre-Socratic philosophers of ancient Greece were expected to be the brains oftheir community, intellectuals in the most responsible sense of that term. They were consulted by their fellow townspeople concerning every type ofproblem, practical as well as speculative, and ranging from epistemology to sanitary engineering. Indeed, their formal philosophizing may have been a pleasant diversion of their spare moments. Clearly they were not specialists. All human knowledge was their 'field', biology as well as astronomy, physics, chemistry and metaphysics, not to mention psychology, sociology and ethics. In addition to theorizing about the life processes, some of them undoubtedly prepared and dispensed medical treatments. Empedocles, we know, claimed miraculous 'cures'. In view of his personality the treatment, in this instance, probably consisted of a mixture of hocus-pocus andgenuine therapy. The physiological opinions ofthe philosophers, together with the ancient practices of the priests of Asclepius and the usages of the gymnasia superintendents, formed the basis of Greek medicine.' Biological observations sometimes exerted a profound influence on the cos- mological speculations ofthe pre-Socratics. For example, Thales' choice ofwater as the primal element may very well have been the product of a number of biological observations-that water is vital to the life processes, that blood and the other body fluids are composed mostly of water, that the generative seed of all creatures is moist, that the sea teems with life, that water condenses from the breath. We find in ancient Greek philosophy two well-defined examples of what we might properly call proto-atomism prior to the true atomism of Leucippus and Democritus. The first of these is the geometrical atomism of the Pythagoreans which found its most influential presentation in the Timaeus of Plato.2 Later in our discussion we will return to Plato's application of this type of corpuscular theory to physiological phenomena. The second is the famous 'seed' hypothesis 317 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.38.176, on 04 Oct 2021 at 20:12:04, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300028799 R. A. Horne of Anaxagoras of Clazomenae (c. 460 B.C.). Empedocles had proposed four primal elements;3 Anaxagoras moved even further away from the monism ofthe Ionians by adopting a most extreme form of pluralism. There are, he main- tained, an infinite number of elements.4 The operation of the dissection of matter leads to a point beyond which further subdivision yields no new species although the motions of subdividing may be continued indefinitely. The materials known to us are mixtures consisting of a limitless variety of parts or elements. But these elements are themselves homogeneous. The properties of bulk matter depend on which element or 'seed' (spermata) predominates. Gold consists mostly ofseeds ofgold, bread ofbread seeds.5This brings us immediately to the principal difficulty which vexed the seed hypothesis, and, interestingly enough, this crucial difficulty hinges upon a physiological phenomenon- digestion. When we eat a crust of bread how does the bread subsequently become blood, flesh and bones? How can this chemical transformation of bread into what is not bread be explained? All things, Anaxagoras hypothesized, must contain all seeds. Bread must contain seeds of blood, flesh and bone. Before ingestion bread seeds predominate but upon digestion, since the seeds themselves are not subject to alteration, the seeds of blood, flesh and bone must somehow come to predominate.6 Just how they manage to do this is left unclear. Whereas Empedocles could account for chemical change by simply attributing it to a separation or combination of the four elements, Anaxagoras awkwardly had to resort to some manner of sorting or reshuffling of a limitless number ofseeds. His attempt to account for change is a particularly vulnerable point ofhis philosophy. The fact that digestion and related phenomena brought Anaxagoras' theories to griefis especially distressing for these were not problems which his cosmological views stumbled on while in full career. Quite the con- trary, these were the very problems which he had in mind when he formulated his theories. The theory was tailored to solve them, and we are left wondering how Anaxagoras could ever have thought that he had succeeded. Perhaps the key has been lost, and the crucial idea is not contained in the fragments we have inherited.7 The classical problems of pre-Socratic speculation, the problem of The One and The Many and of Being and Becoming, were finally satisfactorily resolved by the Atomists. The Ionian philosophers and the Eleatics insisted that all is One but the Pluralists found everywhere evidence for four and, in the case of Anaxagoras, many elements. How can we account for the endless richness and diversity of Nature in terms of a minimum of explanatory parameters? Heraclitus saw man immersed in flux, in constant change. The Eleatics, on the other extreme, insisted that all is Being, that there is no Non-Being and hence no Becoming, that change is an illusion. The resulting philosophical crisis was particularly grave because the Eleatics had invented a proto-logic, the dialectic, so cogent that one appeared to be obliged thereby to choose between reason and the evidence of the senses. The Atomist Democritus (fi. c. 420 B.C.) * represents the culmination of early * I will not attempt to distinguish between the philosophical tenets of Leucippus and those of his pupil Democritus. 3I8 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.38.176, on 04 Oct 2021 at 20:12:04, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300028799 Atomism in Ancient Medical History Greek philosophy for it was he, rather than Plato or Aristotle, who first suc- ceeded in resolving these issues. The world of the Many, the world of Change that we apprehend through the agency of the sensory equipment is a conse- quence of the incessant motion and the formation and dissolution of aggregates of indivisible and unchanging corpuscles or atoms. These atoms are perceived logically; they are imperceptible to the senses. The atoms, and the Void in which they move, are the One and changeless principle ofnature. The necessity which directs their movements constitutes natural law. The Many arise through their permutations; Change through the motion, formation and disintegration of their aggregates. We are told that as a young man Democritus consumed his inheritance with extended travels in Egypt, Persia and perhaps even India, thereby accumu- lating the vast store of knowledge in every discipline, including medical lore, that gained him a formidable reputation.8 When the famous physician Hippocrates passed through Abdera, the townspeople are said to have prevailed upon him to examine their savant, whom they feared to be mad. The doctor discovered the eccentric philosopher performing a dissection:9 Old Democritus under a tree Sits on a stone with book on knee; About him hang many features, Of Cats, Dogs and such like creatures, Of which he makes Anatomy The seat of Black Choler to see. ROBERT BURTON The Anatomy of Melancholy A short interview sufficed for Democritus to better the noted doctor and send him retreating badly shaken. Democritus was a voluminous writer and few topics failed to catch his atten- tion. Among the titles in the partial lists of his works are many ofphysiological interest: On Cheerfulness or Well-Being, On Perception, On Tastes, Causes ofAnimals, Prognosis, On Diet, and On Medical Method. It is disappointing to find, however, that atomism plays very little role in his physiological writings. Bailey has sum- marized the situation: It is hard to find in them anything specially atomic and his speculations were no doubt in- spired by the same contemporary interest in these matters which gave Anaxagoras the starting point in physiology for his main theory of the constitution ofmatter. But there is nothing in the views recorded which is inconsistent with Atomism and it may be taken as certain that Demo- critus took ... pains to accommodate his theories to his main principles.'0 When we say that the philosophy of the ancient Greek Atomists, like that of modern scientists, is logical-empiricism we need neither apologize for, nor qualify, our assertion, but we must add a word of explanation for the relation between the logical and the empirical content ofGreek Atomism is not identical with that of modern Atomism or even, for that matter, with that of ancient Indian Atomism. The atomistic system of the Indian philosopher Kanada (dates very uncertain) was designedly empirical; its expressed purpose was to 3I9 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.38.176, on 04 Oct 2021 at 20:12:04, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300028799 R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zeno of Elea: Where Space, Time, Physics, and Philosophy Converge
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Honors College at WKU Projects Fall 2007 Zeno of Elea: Where Space, Time, Physics, and Philosophy Converge An Everyman’s Introduction to an Unsung Hero of Philosophy William Turner Western Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses Part of the Other Philosophy Commons, Other Physics Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Recommended Citation Turner, William, "Zeno of Elea: Where Space, Time, Physics, and Philosophy Converge An Everyman’s Introduction to an Unsung Hero of Philosophy" (2007). Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Projects. Paper 111. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses/111 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College Capstone Experience/ Thesis Projects by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. P │ S─Z─T │ P Zeno of Elea: Where Space, Time, Physics, and Philosophy Converge An Everyman’s Introduction to an Unsung Hero of Philosophy Will Turner Western Kentucky University Abstract Zeno of Elea, despite being among the most important of the Pre-Socratic philosophers, is frequently overlooked by philosophers and scientists alike in modern times. Zeno of Elea’s arguments on have not only been an impetus for the most important scientific and mathematical theories in human history, his arguments still serve as a basis for modern problems and theoretical speculations. This is a study of his arguments on motion, the purpose they have served in the history of science, and modern applications of Zeno of Elea’s arguments on motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Skepticism and Pluralism Ways of Living a Life Of
    SKEPTICISM AND PLURALISM WAYS OF LIVING A LIFE OF AWARENESS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ZHUANGZI #±r A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHILOSOPHY AUGUST 2004 By John Trowbridge Dissertation Committee: Roger T. Ames, Chairperson Tamara Albertini Chung-ying Cheng James E. Tiles David R. McCraw © Copyright 2004 by John Trowbridge iii Dedicated to my wife, Jill iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In completing this research, I would like to express my appreciation first and foremost to my wife, Jill, and our three children, James, Holly, and Henry for their support during this process. I would also like to express my gratitude to my entire dissertation committee for their insight and understanding ofthe topics at hand. Studying under Roger Ames has been a transformative experience. In particular, his commitment to taking the Chinese tradition on its own terms and avoiding the tendency among Western interpreters to overwrite traditional Chinese thought with the preoccupations ofWestern philosophy has enabled me to broaden my conception ofphilosophy itself. Roger's seminars on Confucianism and Daoism, and especially a seminar on writing a philosophical translation ofthe Zhongyong r:pJm (Achieving Equilibrium in the Everyday), have greatly influenced my own initial attempts to translate and interpret the seminal philosophical texts ofancient China. Tamara Albertini's expertise in ancient Greek philosophy was indispensable to this project, and a seminar I audited with her, comparing early Greek and ancient Chinese philosophy, was part ofthe inspiration for my choice ofresearch topic. I particularly valued the opportunity to study Daoism and the Yijing ~*~ with Chung-ying Cheng g\Gr:p~ and benefited greatly from his theory ofonto-cosmology as a means of understanding classical Chinese philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas on the Mind, Body, and Life After Death
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Williams Honors College, Honors Research The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors Projects College Spring 2020 St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas on the Mind, Body, and Life After Death Christopher Choma [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects Part of the Christianity Commons, Epistemology Commons, European History Commons, History of Philosophy Commons, History of Religion Commons, Metaphysics Commons, Philosophy of Mind Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Recommended Citation Choma, Christopher, "St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas on the Mind, Body, and Life After Death" (2020). Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects. 1048. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects/1048 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors College at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The University of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 1 St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas on the Mind, Body, and Life After Death By: Christopher Choma Sponsored by: Dr. Joseph Li Vecchi Readers: Dr. Howard Ducharme Dr. Nathan Blackerby 2 Table of Contents Introduction p. 4 Section One: Three General Views of Human Nature p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liar Paradox As a Reductio Ad Absurdum Argument
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 3 May 15th, 9:00 AM - May 17th, 5:00 PM The Liar Paradox as a reductio ad absurdum argument Menashe Schwed Ashkelon Academic College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive Part of the Philosophy Commons Schwed, Menashe, "The Liar Paradox as a reductio ad absurdum argument" (1999). OSSA Conference Archive. 48. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA3/papersandcommentaries/48 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences and Conference Proceedings at Scholarship at UWindsor. It has been accepted for inclusion in OSSA Conference Archive by an authorized conference organizer of Scholarship at UWindsor. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Title: The Liar Paradox as a Reductio ad Absurdum Author: Menashe Schwed Response to this paper by: Lawrence Powers (c)2000 Menashe Schwed 1. Introduction The paper discusses two seemingly separated topics: the origin and function of the Liar Paradox in ancient Greek philosophy and the Reduction ad absurdum mode of argumentation. Its goal is to show how the two topics fit together and why they are closely connected. The accepted tradition is that Eubulides of Miletos was the first to formulate the Liar Paradox correctly and that the paradox was part of the philosophical discussion of the Megarian School. Which version of the paradox was formulated by Eubulides is unknown, but according to some hints given by Aristotle and an incorrect version given by Cicero1, the version was probably as follows: The paradox is created from the Liar sentence ‘I am lying’.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Atomism and Ash'arite Origins for Cartesian Occasionalism Revisited
    Time Atomism and Ash‘arite Origins for Cartesian Occasionalism Revisited Richard T. W. Arthur Department of Philosophy McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario Canada Time Atomism and Ash’arite Origins for Occasionalism Revisited Introduction In gauging the contributions of Asian thinkers to the making of modern “Western” philosophy and science, one often encounters the difficulty of establishing a direct influence. Arun Bala and George Gheverghese Joseph (2007) have termed this “the transmission problem”. One can establish a precedence, as well as a strong probability that an influence occurred, without being able to find concrete evidence for it. In the face of this difficulty (which appears to occur quite generally in the history of thought) I suggest here that the influence of earlier thinkers does not always occur through one person reading others’ work and becoming persuaded by their arguments, but by people in given epistemic situations being constrained by certain historically and socially conditioned trends of thought—for which constraining and conditioned trends of thought I coin the term "epistemic vectors"—and opportunistically availing themselves of kindred views from other traditions. As a case in point, I will examine here the claim that the doctrine of Occasionalism arose in seventeenth century Europe as a result of an influence from Islamic theology. In particular, the Ash’arite school of kalâm presented occasionalism as a corollary of time atomism, and since to many scholars the seventeenth century occasionalism of Cartesian thinkers such as De la Forge and Cordemoy has appeared as a direct corollary of the atomism of time attributed to Descartes in his Meditations, Ash’arite time atomism is often cited as the likely source of Cartesian Occasionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Thales of Miletus Sources and Interpretations Miletli Thales Kaynaklar Ve Yorumlar
    Thales of Miletus Sources and Interpretations Miletli Thales Kaynaklar ve Yorumlar David Pierce October , Matematics Department Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University Istanbul http://mat.msgsu.edu.tr/~dpierce/ Preface Here are notes of what I have been able to find or figure out about Thales of Miletus. They may be useful for anybody interested in Thales. They are not an essay, though they may lead to one. I focus mainly on the ancient sources that we have, and on the mathematics of Thales. I began this work in preparation to give one of several - minute talks at the Thales Meeting (Thales Buluşması) at the ruins of Miletus, now Milet, September , . The talks were in Turkish; the audience were from the general popu- lation. I chose for my title “Thales as the originator of the concept of proof” (Kanıt kavramının öncüsü olarak Thales). An English draft is in an appendix. The Thales Meeting was arranged by the Tourism Research Society (Turizm Araştırmaları Derneği, TURAD) and the office of the mayor of Didim. Part of Aydın province, the district of Didim encompasses the ancient cities of Priene and Miletus, along with the temple of Didyma. The temple was linked to Miletus, and Herodotus refers to it under the name of the family of priests, the Branchidae. I first visited Priene, Didyma, and Miletus in , when teaching at the Nesin Mathematics Village in Şirince, Selçuk, İzmir. The district of Selçuk contains also the ruins of Eph- esus, home town of Heraclitus. In , I drafted my Miletus talk in the Math Village. Since then, I have edited and added to these notes.
    [Show full text]
  • I Were Zeno's Arguments a Reply to Attacks Upon Parmenides?
    Were Zeno's a Arguments Reply To Attacks upon Parmenides? N. B. BOOTH NE of the mysteries about Zeno of Elea's arguments is that, whereas learn from all the available that Zeno was we evidence particularly concerned to defend the One of Parmenides 1, yet we find him, in his arguments about plurality, doing all that he can to refute the "ones" of a plurality.2 This would be reasonable if we could be sure that his arguments were valid only against the "ones" of a plurality, not against Parmenides's One; but it is by no means certain that this is true, as we shall see in the course of my discussion. The difficulty was already felt by the ancient commentators 3, and perhaps by Plato as well 4 ; it may be a "pseudo-problem", but if so, it is a pseudo-problem of some antiquity. One suggested solution is to the effect that, before Zeno produced his 5 arguments, certain critics had attacked Parmenides's One with much the same arguments as Zeno later used to attack the "ones" of the pluralists. The two main sources of evidence 6 for this suggestion are a passage in Plato's Parmenides ( i 2 8 c), and Zeno's arguments themselves ' ; a third is possibly to be found in the arguments of Parmenides's other pupil, Melissus.8 There is, regrettably, no definite statement on the subject in any of our authorities. In the passage from the Parmenides ( i 2 8 c), Plato makes the character "Zeno" apologize for the shortcomings of his book about plurality: "It I is really an attempt to support Parmenides's argument against those who try to redicule his theory that 'One is', saying that, if 'One is', then many absurd and inconsistent conclusions follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece
    Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Ancient Greek Philosophy but didn’t Know Who to Ask Edited by Patricia F. O’Grady MEET THE PHILOSOPHERS OF ANCIENT GREECE Dedicated to the memory of Panagiotis, a humble man, who found pleasure when reading about the philosophers of Ancient Greece Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything you always wanted to know about Ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask Edited by PATRICIA F. O’GRADY Flinders University of South Australia © Patricia F. O’Grady 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Patricia F. O’Grady has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identi.ed as the editor of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East Suite 420 Union Road 101 Cherry Street Farnham Burlington Surrey, GU9 7PT VT 05401-4405 England USA Ashgate website: http://www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask 1. Philosophy, Ancient 2. Philosophers – Greece 3. Greece – Intellectual life – To 146 B.C. I. O’Grady, Patricia F. 180 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask / Patricia F.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Article
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Asclepiades of Bithynia (1st - 2nd Century BC) Atomic Theory in Caelius Aurelianus (5th Century AD) Work on Acute and Chronic 183 Diseases Konstantinos Laios1 1- Medical School, National and Kapo- distrian University of Athens, Greece Abstract Correspondence: Asclepiades of Bithynia (2nd half of the first century to the 1st half of the Konstantinos Laios second century BC) was a physician and a philosopher who was influ- Ph.D. Athinodorou 1, Kato Petralona, 118 53, Athens, Attiki, Greece enced a lot by Epicurus (341 – 270 BC); however, he managed to form [email protected] his own medical theory. Very helpful to understand the medical theory of Asclepiades of Bithynia is the Latin translation of Soranus of Ephesus (2nd half of the first century to 1st half of the second century AD) work on acute and on chronic diseases by Caelius Aurelianus (5th century AD). Asclepiades of Bithynia medical theory was applied to the inter- pretation of many different diseases, in which the physician combined the principles of Methodic School which was about the stretching and narrowing of pores, with those of humoral pathology and the principals of Pneumatic School. Key words: Asclepiades of Bithynia, Soranus of Ephesus, Caelius Au- relianus, Atomic Theory Received: 22 Jun 2017; Accepted: 29 Oct 2017; Online published: 20 Nov 2017 Research on History of Medicine/ 2017 Nov; 6(4): 183-188. Res Hist Med 2017; 6(4) Konstantinos Laios Introductionakhsgjhgfgjhfgjhjhjhgjhzj akhsgjhgfgjhfgjhjhjhgjhzj 1- Drabkin, 1950: 1-1002. Caeliushzjjzgjzjzjzgjzjfgjzfhg Aurelianus (5th century AD),hzjjzgjzjzjzgjzjfgjzfhg the Roman physi- 2- Urso, 1997: 1-166. 3- Van der Eijk, 2005: 299-327.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek (Hellenic) Rheumatology Over the Years: from Ancient to Modern Times
    Rheumatology International (2019) 39:947–955 Rheumatology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04261-4 INTERNATIONAL REVIEW The Greek (Hellenic) rheumatology over the years: from ancient to modern times Lazaros I. Sakkas1 · Panagiotis Tronzas2 Received: 07 January 2019 / Accepted: 20 February 2019 / Published online: 25 February 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Rheumatology has its roots in ancient Greece. Hippocrates and other prominent Greek (Hellenes) physicians in ancient times, Hellenistic, Roman, and Byzantine period were acute observers of disease course and of patients and were able to define many disorders. They wrote books on various aspects of medicine and these writings were the basis of medical practice and education in Europe and the Arabic world well into the seventeenth century. In 1821, Greece emerged from a long occupa- tion by the Turks. In 1930, Adamantiades, a Greek Ophthalmologist, before Behcet of Turkey, described what is known as (Adamantiades)–Behcet disease. The first scientific Hellenic Society for Rheumatology (ERE) was established in 1960 and today ERE having been merged with the Professional Union of Greek rheumatologists (EPERE) is known as ERE-EPERE. Rheumatology is a strong specialty with 348 rheumatologists for a population of around 11 million. Greek rheumatologists have contributed to rheumatology science and practice, and are active physicians participating in the American College of Rheumatology and the EULAR annual congresses and in many educational postgraduate courses. ERE-EPERE formed thera- peutic protocols for inflammatory and autoimmune rheumatic diseases which were incorporated in the electronic National prescription system. Rheumatologists are authorized to use this platform to prescribe biologicals free of charge for patients.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mathematical Anti-Atomism of Plato's Timaeus
    The mathematical anti-atomism of Plato’s Timaeus Luc Brisson, Salomon Ofman To cite this version: Luc Brisson, Salomon Ofman. The mathematical anti-atomism of Plato’s Timaeus. Ancient Philoso- phy, Philosophy Documentation Center, In press. hal-02923266 HAL Id: hal-02923266 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02923266 Submitted on 26 Aug 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The mathematical anti-atomism of Plato’s Timaeus Luc Brisson Salomon Ofman Centre Jean Pépin CNRS-Institut mathématique de Jussieu- CNRS-UMR 8230 Paris Rive Gauche École normale supérieure Sorbonne Université Paris Sciences Lettres Paris Université Abstract. In Plato’s eponymous dialogue, Timaeus, the main character presents the universe as an almost perfect sphere filled by tiny invisible particles having the form of four regular polyhedrons. At first glance, such a construction may seem close to an atomic theory. However, one does not find any text in Antiquity tying Timaeus’ cosmology to the atomists, and Aristotle made a clear distinction between Plato and the latter. Despite the cosmology in the Timaeus is so far apart from the one of the atomists, Plato is commonly presented in contemporary literature as some sort of atomist, sometimes as supporting a so-called form of ‘mathematical atomism’.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Greek Philosophy
    P1: GNK/ABS P2: CSS/SCM P3: CSS/SCM QC: ANG/ADS T1: ADS CB162/Long CB162-FM1 January 29, 1999 13:56 The Cambridge Companion to EARLY GREEK PHILOSOPHY Edited by A. A. Long University of California, Berkeley iii P1: GNK/ABS P2: CSS/SCM P3: CSS/SCM QC: ANG/ADS T1: ADS CB162/Long CB162-FM1 January 29, 1999 13:56 published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru, uk http: //www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa http: //www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia c Cambridge University Press 1999 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 1999 Printed in the United States of America Typeset in Trump Medieval 10/13 pt. in LATEX[tb] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Cambridge companion to early Greek philosophy/edited by A. A. Long. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and indexes. isbn 0-521-44122-6 (hbk.) isbn 0-521-44667-8 (pbk.) 1. Philosophy, Ancient. 1. Long, A. A. B188.C35 1999 182 –dc21 98-38077 CIP isbn 0 521 44122 6 hardback isbn 0 521 44667 8 paperback iv P1: GNK/ABS P2: CSS/SCM P3: CSS/SCM QC: ANG/ADS T1: ADS CB162/Long CB162-FM1 January 29, 1999 13:56 contents Contributors page vii Preface xi Source abbreviations xv Lives and writings of the early Greek philosophers xvii Chronology xxix Map xxxi 1 The scope of early Greek philosophy a.
    [Show full text]