Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Galbraith Lake Bunkhouse Construction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Galbraith Lake Bunkhouse Construction Environmental Assessment Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Galbraith Lake Bunkhouse Construction May 2021 Prepared by Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Fairbanks, AK Estimated Lead Agency Total Costs Associated with Developing and Producing This Environmental Assessment: $1,500 EA Template Table of Contents PROPOSED ACTION 3 BACKGROUND 3 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE ACTION 5 ALTERNATIVES 7 ALTERNATIVE A – [NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE] 8 ALTERNATIVE B 8 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 7 SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS 18 ALTERNATIVE A – [NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE] 18 ALTERNATIVE B 18 LIST OF SOURCES, AGENCIES AND PERSONS CONSULTED 19 LIST OF PREPARERS 19 STATE COORDINATION 19 TRIBAL CONSULTATION 19 PUBLIC OUTREACH 19 DETERMINATION 20 SIGNATURES 20 REFERENCES 21 2 Environmental Assessment for Galbraith Lake Bunkhouse Construction Environmental Assessment for Arctic National Wildlife Refuge bunkhouse construction at Galbraith Lake, AK Date: May 7, 2021 This Draft Environmental Assessment is being prepared to evaluate the effects associated with the proposed action and complies with the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance with Council on Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR 1500-1509) and Department of the Interior (43 CFR 46; 516 DM 8) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (550 FW 3) regulations and policies. The National Environmental Policy Act requires examination of the effects of proposed actions on the natural and human environment (see Appendix A for relevant Laws and Orders). Proposed Action The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is proposing to construct a new bunkhouse and vault toilet facility on a BLM lease space at the Galbraith Lake Airport. This building would serve as a bunkhouse, providing temporary housing for up to 8-10 persons consistent with the Arctic Refuge CCP (2015) (2.4.21.2) for the use and occupancy of administrative cabins. A proposed action may evolve during the NEPA process as the agency refines its proposal and gathers feedback from the public. Therefore, the final proposed action may be different from the original. The proposed action will be finalized at the conclusion of the public comment period for the EA. Background National Wildlife Refuges are guided by the mission and goals of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), the purposes of an individual refuge, Service policy, and laws and international treaties. Relevant guidance includes the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Refuge Recreation Act of 1962, and selected portions of the Code of Federal Regulations and Fish and Wildlife Service Manual. The mission of the NWRS, as outlined by the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act (NWRSAA), as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.), is “... to administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management and, where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans” 3 Environmental Assessment for Galbraith Lake Bunkhouse Construction Additionally, the NWRSAA mandates the Secretary of the Interior in administering the NWRS (16 U.S.C. 668dd(a)(4)) to: • Provide for the conservation of fish, wildlife, and plants, and their habitats within the NWRS; • Ensure that the biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health of the NWRS are maintained for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans; • Ensure that the mission of the NWRS described at 16 U.S.C. 668dd(a)(2) and the purposes of each refuge are carried out; • Ensure effective coordination, interaction, and cooperation with owners of land adjoining refuges and the fish and wildlife agency of the states in which the units of the NWRS are located; • Assist in the maintenance of adequate water quantity and water quality to fulfill the mission of the NWRS and the purposes of each refuge; • Recognize compatible wildlife-dependent recreational uses as the priority general public uses of the NWRS through which the American public can develop an appreciation for fish and wildlife; • Ensure that opportunities are provided within the NWRS for compatible wildlife- dependent recreational uses; and • Monitor the status and trends of fish, wildlife, and plants in each refuge. The Arctic National Wildlife Range (Arctic Range, Range) was created in 1960 by Public Land Order (PLO) 2214 to “to preserve unique wildlife, wilderness, and recreational values” within the Range. In 1980, The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) re-designated the Range as part of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and provided four purposes that guide management of the entire Refuge. Section 303(2)(B) of ANILCA set forth the following purposes for Arctic Refuge. ( i) to conserve fish and wildlife populations and habitats in their natural diversity including, but not limited to, the Porcupine caribou herd (including participation in coordinating the Western Arctic caribou herd, polar bears, grizzly bears, musk ox, Dall sheep, wolves, wolverines, snow geese, peregrine falcons and other migratory birds, and Arctic char and grayling. 4 Environmental Assessment for Galbraith Lake Bunkhouse Construction (ii) to fulfill the international treaty obligations of the United States with respect to fish and wildlife and their habitats. (iii) to provide, in a manner consistent with the purposes set forth in subparagraphs (i) and (ii), the opportunity for continued subsistence uses by local residents. (iv) to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable and in a manner consistent with the purposes set forth in paragraph (i), water quality and necessary water quantity within the Refuge. The Tax Act of 2017 added a 5th purpose to include an Oil and Gas program. This Act orders the Secretary of the Interior to establish an oil and gas plan for the Coastal Plain and required that two lease sales occur within 10 years of the passage of the Act. ANILCA section 702(3) also designated 7.16 million acres of the Refuge as Wilderness. The Wilderness Act of 1964 established the National Wildlife Preservation System and prescribed policy for management of designated Wilderness areas. The purposes of the Wilderness Act are within and supplemental to the purposes of the Refuge, subject to the exceptions found in ANILCA. ANILCA Sections 602(39)(42)(43) and 605(a) designated those portions of the Ivishak, Sheenjek, and Wind rivers within the boundaries of the Refuge as wild rivers pursuant to the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, as amended by ANILCA Section 606. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 established the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System and designated certain rivers as wild, scenic, or recreational. Purpose and Need for the Action The purpose of this proposed action is the construct a new bunkhouse/rest room facility at Galbraith Lake. The existing bunkhouse is a small (sub 600 ft²), single room building with two small bedrooms that are a recent addition. The facility functions predominantly as a bunkhouse and work station for field crews working on the North Slope or in the Brooks Range. The small size of the existing building and lack of restroom facilities greatly limits the effectiveness of the bunkhouse for consistent and longer term use. The existing building also has unreliable power availability that adds to the challenges of using the facility year round. A larger and more 5 Environmental Assessment for Galbraith Lake Bunkhouse Construction modern facility would greatly benefit Refuge operations along the Dalton Highway, the North Slope and the Brooks Range. Other conservation partners such as the National Park Service (NPS), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) and United States Forest Service (USFS) would also benefit from this enhanced facility as a base of operations. The entire new bunkhouse total footprint would be approximately 2000 ft², built directly east of the existing bunkhouse (See Figure 1), include a new vault toilet and relocated fuel tank that will impact less than ¼ acres. The purpose of the facility would be to provide transient housing for Refuge staff and conservation partners. Figure 1: New Bunkhouse site map 6 Environmental Assessment for Galbraith Lake Bunkhouse Construction Figure 2: Existing bunkhouse and gravel pad Figure 3: Rear of bunkhouse, fuel tank and gravel fill above existing tundra 7 Environmental Assessment for Galbraith Lake Bunkhouse Construction Alternatives Alternative A – No Action Alternative Under the “no action” alternative, no new building would be constructed. The existing bunkhouse would continue to be used periodically throughout the year with most use occurring in the summer months. The bunkhouse would remain a modest sized facility with 2 independent sleeping rooms lacking a reliable and dedicated power source and a restroom facility. Occasional updates, renovations and any necessary safety improvements would be made to the cabin when warranted, but no significant renovations would occur. The designated construction site for a new facility on the southern edge of the airport/tarmac area would remain unencumbered. Alternative B – Construct Bunkhouse (Preferred Alternative) Under the Proposed Action Alternative, the Service’s preferred alternative – a new bunkhouse would be constructed within the expanded lease area directly east of the existing bunkhouse (see Figure 1). Included in this
Recommended publications
  • Appendix H Draft Plan of Development
    DOCKET NO. CP17-___-000 DOC NO: USAI-PE-SRREG-00- RESOURCE REPORT NO. 8 000008-000 ALASKA LNG APPENDIX H – DRAFT PLAN OF DATE: APRIL 14, 2017 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REVISION: 0 PUBLIC APPENDIX H DRAFT PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT DRAFT PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT AKLNG-6020-REG-PLN-DOC-00029 AKLNG-6020-REG-PLN-DOC-00029 PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT 4-APR-17 REVISION: 0 PUBLIC PAGE 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 SUMMARY OF PROJECT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................ 8 1.3 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION AND REVISION .............................................................................. 8 2.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION ................................................................................... 9 2.1 EXPECTED PUBLIC BENEFITS ............................................................................................... 10 2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Overview .............................................................................................................. 10 2.3 COMMODITY AND PURPOSE ................................................................................................. 12 3.0 PROJECT LOCATION AND LAND REQUIREMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 2 Land Management Policies for Each Management Unit 3 4 Introduction
    1 Chapter 3 2 Land Management Policies for Each Management Unit 3 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 5 Organization of Chapter ...................................................................................................... 2 6 Land Use Designations ....................................................................................................... 2 7 Map 3: Planning Area and Regions ............................................................................. 3 8 Designations Used in This Plan .......................................................................................... 5 9 Explanation of Habitat Designations .................................................................................. 9 10 Explanation of Oil and Gas Designation .......................................................................... 10 11 Resources and Uses and Management Intent .................................................................... 10 12 Duration and Flexibility of Plan ....................................................................................... 11 13 Glossary ............................................................................................................................ 12 14 Plan Structure .......................................................................................................................... 12 15 Plan Regions ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2004-2006 STIP Phases
    2004-2006 STIP National Highway System draft DRAFT STIP Req'd Funding >6 Need ID Highway Location Project Description/Funding Source Phse Apprn FFY 04 FFY 05 FFY 06 FFY 07 FFY 08 FFY 09FFY 10 years 10547 Alaska MP 1222 to 1235 Rehabilitation - (Border West) 2 500.0 410.0 Leveling and resurfacing. 4 9,000.0 Federal IM 0.0 0.0 467.0 382.9 8,406.0 0.0 State 0.0 0.0 33.0 27.1 594.0 0.0 Other Project Total 0.0 0.0 500.0 410.0 9,000.0 0.0 0.0 10548 Alaska MP 1256 to 1270 Rehab - Lakeview - Northway Jct. 2 560.0 Leveling and Resurfacing. 4 Federal IM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 509.4 State 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.6 Other Project Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 560.0 7,000.0 6088 Alaska MP 1270 to 1314 Rehabilitation - Northway Junction to Tok 2 150.0 Relevel, resurface and install WIM - Northway Junction to Tok. 4 7,770.0 Federal IM 0.0 140.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 State 0.0 9.9 7,770.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other Project Total 0.0 150.0 7,770.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7367 Alaska MP 1308 - Tok Weigh Station 2 200.0 New weighing system facility to facilitate simultaneous axle group and gross weight indications for truck weight enforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • Galbraith Lake Airport and Access Road
    Galbraith Lake Airport and Access Road Compliance The proposed action is in conformance with the approved Bureau of Land Management Utility Corridor Resource Management Plan approved January 11, 1991. The project has been considered in the context of public health and safety and consistency with regards to Federal, State, and local laws. Selected Action The proposed action described in the Category Exclusion mentioned below is the selected action. A twenty (20) year airport lease case file F-12632 and a twenty (20) year right-of-way grant case file F-91217 for the access road from the Dalton Highway MP 275 to the airport will be issued to the State of Alaska, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. This lease and grant is for the continued operation of the Galbraith Lake Airport and the access road to the airport. Compliance with NEPA: The proposed action is categorically excluded from further documentation under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in accordance with United States Department of the Interior 43 CFR §46.210 or United States Department of Interior Manual, Part 516, Chapter 11 which provides: 11.9 E (Realty) (9) Renewals and assignments of leases, permits, or rights-of-way where no additional rights are conveyed beyond those granted by the original authorizations. Public Involvement: It was determined that no public involvement was needed due to the remoteness of the action Rationale: The proposed action is consistent with the use of public lands under the authorities of Titles III and V of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the regulations found in 43 CFR 2920 and 43 CFR 2800.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 - 2013 STIP Revision 2 7 Incorporated
    2010 - 2013 STIP Revision 2 7 Incorporated Amendment (Revision 27) Approved by FHWA & FTA July 28, 2011 Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities "Providing for the safe movement of people and goods and the delivery of state services" How to Reach Us •B am>W Statewide Prudhoe Bay Division of Program Development . - P.O. Box 112500 Northern Region Planning 3132 Channel Drive, Suite 200 Phone: (907) 451-5150 Juneau, AK 99811-2500 Fax: (907) 451-2333 PHONE: (907) 465-4070 (in Jtmeau) Kotzebue.. ethan.birkholz@alaska. gov TOLL FREE: (888) PLAN DOT (752-6368) Circle FAX: (907) 465-6984 (in Juneau) • FREE FAX: (888) PLAN FAX (752-6329) Gambell Ruby • ~h a g • Alaska Relay: Tok (800) 770-8973 for TTY Kot li~ • • • Pax~on (800) 770-8255 for Voice • Talkeetna Holy Cr~rs McGm111 0 • • Gicnnllllen (800) 770-3919 for ASCII Scammon Bay • Crooked Creek 1\nchorege Valdez (866) 355-6198 for STS • • • Bctbd• • •'Skagway (866) 335-6199 for Spanish Cordovn JUllcau EMAIL: [email protected] vcliuuu • INTERNET: http://www.dot.state.ak.us/stip • ~tersburg .--------------iS~int Paul Kiug Salmon S i lk~ • A till • Central Region Planning tKodiak Phone: (907) 269-0520 Fax: (907) 269-0521 - Southeast Region Planning and david.post@a la.ska. gov SandP<:rint Alaska Marine Highway Unalaska dak 0' Phone: (907) 465-1776 -· ~- Fax: (907) 465-2016 andy.hughes@alaska. gov Anchorage Metropolitan Area Fairbanks Metropolitan Art>a Transpor·tation Solutions Transpor·tation Systt>m AMATS Coordinator FMATS MPO Coordinator Mtmicipality of Anchorage City ofFairbanks P.O. Box 196650 800 Cuslunan Street Anchorage, AK 99519-6650 Fairbanks, AK 99701-4615 PHONE: (907) 343-7996 PHONE: (907) 459-6786 FAX: (907) 343-7998 FAX: (907) 459-6783 [email protected] djgardino@ci fairbanks.ak.us DOT&PF Anchorage Area Planner DOT&PF Fairbanks Area Planner P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 1996 - 1998
    Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 1996 - 1998 Department of Transportation and Public Facilities May 1996 How to contact us: This Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) was prepared by the Division of Statewide Planning, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. Additional copies of this document or further information about the selection process can be obtained by calling or writing this office. To receive further information or to send us your comments about this document please contact us: Tom Brigham, Director Statewide Planning Division Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities 3132 Channel Drive Juneau, AK 99801-1798 Phone: (907) 4654070 (907) 465-6984 gq. (907) 465-3652 Toll free: (888) PLAN DOT 752-6368 EMail: [email protected] WVW: http://www.dot.state.ak.us/ Photo Credits: Top - Canyon Creek Bridge, Seward Highway will be rebuilt in 1996 and 1997 as part of the National Highway System. Bruce Freitag Center - Capital Transit Bus on Franklin Street, Juneau, Alaska. Replacement buses will be purchased as part of the Community Transportation Program in 1996. Jeff Ottesen Bottom - Whale Park overlook constructed as part of Transportation Enhancement Program in Sitka, Alaska. City and Borough of Sitka Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Federal Fiscal Years 1996 - 1998 Contents Introduction and Summary Purpose of the STIP ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze Zestawienie Zawiera 8372 Kody Lotnisk
    KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze zestawienie zawiera 8372 kody lotnisk. Zestawienie uszeregowano: Kod ICAO = Nazwa portu lotniczego = Lokalizacja portu lotniczego AGAF=Afutara Airport=Afutara AGAR=Ulawa Airport=Arona, Ulawa Island AGAT=Uru Harbour=Atoifi, Malaita AGBA=Barakoma Airport=Barakoma AGBT=Batuna Airport=Batuna AGEV=Geva Airport=Geva AGGA=Auki Airport=Auki AGGB=Bellona/Anua Airport=Bellona/Anua AGGC=Choiseul Bay Airport=Choiseul Bay, Taro Island AGGD=Mbambanakira Airport=Mbambanakira AGGE=Balalae Airport=Shortland Island AGGF=Fera/Maringe Airport=Fera Island, Santa Isabel Island AGGG=Honiara FIR=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGH=Honiara International Airport=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGI=Babanakira Airport=Babanakira AGGJ=Avu Avu Airport=Avu Avu AGGK=Kirakira Airport=Kirakira AGGL=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova Airport=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova, Santa Cruz Island AGGM=Munda Airport=Munda, New Georgia Island AGGN=Nusatupe Airport=Gizo Island AGGO=Mono Airport=Mono Island AGGP=Marau Sound Airport=Marau Sound AGGQ=Ontong Java Airport=Ontong Java AGGR=Rennell/Tingoa Airport=Rennell/Tingoa, Rennell Island AGGS=Seghe Airport=Seghe AGGT=Santa Anna Airport=Santa Anna AGGU=Marau Airport=Marau AGGV=Suavanao Airport=Suavanao AGGY=Yandina Airport=Yandina AGIN=Isuna Heliport=Isuna AGKG=Kaghau Airport=Kaghau AGKU=Kukudu Airport=Kukudu AGOK=Gatokae Aerodrome=Gatokae AGRC=Ringi Cove Airport=Ringi Cove AGRM=Ramata Airport=Ramata ANYN=Nauru International Airport=Yaren (ICAO code formerly ANAU) AYBK=Buka Airport=Buka AYCH=Chimbu Airport=Kundiawa AYDU=Daru Airport=Daru
    [Show full text]
  • 06-'12, Rural Airports AIP Spending Plan October 20, 2010 DOT/PF, Statewide Aviation
    Draft FFY '06-'12, Rural Airports AIP Spending Plan October 20, 2010 DOT/PF, Statewide Aviation APEB LOCID Project Score Ph FFY'06 FFY'07 FFY'08 FFY'09 FFY'10 FFY'11 FFY'12 After FFY'12 Rural Primary Airports Primary Airfield Projects ANI Aniak Airport Improvements 130 2,3,4 $ 4,700,000 BRW Barrow Apron Expansion 88 2,4 $ 7,000,000 BRW Barrow RWY-Apron Paving/ SA Expan-Stg 3 124 2,4$ 3,000,000 BRW Barrow RWY-Apron Paving/ SA Expan-Stg 4 124 2,4 $ 7,200,000 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 2 BET (GA Apron Expansion) 130 2,4$ 5,701,583 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 3 (Parallel Runway Gravel Surface and BET Lighting) 160 2,4$ 2,733,217 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 4 (Parallel Runway Gravel Surface and BET Lighting) 160 2,4$ 5,877,983 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 5 BET (Parallel Runway Paving) 160 2,4$ 3,277,634 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 6 BET (ROW) 130 2,4 $ 1,650,000 BET Bethel West Heavy Apron Expansion 101 2,4 $ 4,000,000 Bethel Airport RWY / TWY / Commerical BET Apron Pavement Rehabilitation (C) N/A 2,4 $ 13,000,000 Bethel Airport RWY / TWY / Commerical BET Apron Pavement Rehabilitation N/A 2,4 $ 13,000,000 BET Bethel South GA Apron Reconstruction (C) N/A 2,4 $ 4,700,000 BET Bethel South GAApron Reconstruction N/A 2,4 $ 4,700,000 CDV Cordova Apt Apron, TWY & GA Imp Stg 1 113 2,4$ 4,499,980 CDV Cordova Apt Apron, TWY & GA Imp Stg 2 113 2,4 $ 8,500,000 CDV Cordova Apt Apron, TWY & GA Imp Stg 2 (C) 113 2,4 $ 8,500,000 CDV Cordova Apt Apron, TWY & GA Imp Stg 3 113 2,4 $ 6,700,000 CDV Cordova Apt RSA Expan - Stg 2 N/A 2,4$ 4,346,424 CDV Cordova Apt RSA Improvements (Paving) 65 2,4$ 650,000 Note: Spending Plan contains entitlement and discretionary funded projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Bill HB 47
    22-GH1050\A HOUSE BILL NO. 47 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA TWENTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION BY THE HOUSE RULES COMMITTEE BY REQUEST OF THE GOVERNOR Introduced: Referred: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED 1 "An Act making capital appropriations and capitalizing funds; making appropriations 2 under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional 3 budget reserve fund; and providing for an effective date." 4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA: 5 (SECTION 1 OF THIS ACT BEGINS ON PAGE 2) -1- HB 47 New Text Underlined [DELETED TEXT BRACKETED] 1 * Sec. 1 The following appropriations are for capital projects and grants 2 from the general fund or other funds as set out in Section 2 of this act by funding 3 source to the agencies named for the purposes expressed. They lapse under 4 AS 37.25.020, unless otherwise noted. 5 6 Appropriation General Federal Other 7 Allocations Items Funds Funds Funds 8 Department of Administration 9 Payroll and Accounting System Replacement 10 Analysis (ED 99) 400,000 400,000 11 State-Owned Buildings Valuation Project (ED 12 99) 60,000 60,000 13 ARCS Video Automation and Control Project 14 (ED 99) 77,500 77,500 15 License Plates and Drivers License Manuals 16 (ED 99) 345,000 345,000 17 Emergency Communications: Land Mobile Radio 18 Migration (ED 99) 16,248,100 1,354,400 14,893,700 19 Electronic Signatures Project (ED 99) 100,000 100,000 20 Mainframe Improvements, Equipment 21 Replacement, Virus Scanning, and 22 Metadirectory Development (ED 99) 2,181,000 2,181,000 23 Upgrade Internet and Intranet, and Implement 24 New Network Technology (ED 99) 539,900 539,900 25 Department of Community & Economic Development 26 Securities Database (ED 99) 300,000 300,000 27 Operation Renew Hope (ED 99) 30,500,000 500,000 30,000,000 28 Community Block Grants (ED 99) 9,000,000 9,000,000 29 Federal Community Development Grants (ED 99) 1,200,000 150,000 1,050,000 30 Bulk Fuel Systems Upgrades (ED 99) 4,950,000 3,350,000 1,600,000 Page: 2 HB 47 Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor's Capital Budget - Appropriations and Allocations (By Department) FY2002 Governor's Amended
    Governor's Capital Budget - Appropriations and Allocations (by department) FY2002 Governor's Amended General 1003 G/F Match 1039 UA/ICR 1139 AHFC Div Federal Other Total Funds Agency Project Title Funds Funds Funds Department of Administration Pioneers' Homes Emergency Repairs and Maintenance AP 100,000 0 0 250,000 0 0 350,000 Pioneers' Homes Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disabilities AP 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 Modifications Adult Day Facility Prototype Design for Dementia Clients AP 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 Payroll and Accounting System Replacement Analysis AP 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 State-Owned Buildings Valuation Project AP 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 ARCS Video Automation and Control Project AP 77,500 0 0 0 0 0 77,500 License Plates and Drivers License Manuals AP 275,000 0 0 0 0 0 275,000 Emergency Communications: Land Mobile Radio Migration AP 1,354,400 0 0 0 14,893,700 0 16,248,100 Electronic Signatures Project AP 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 Mainframe Improvements, Equipment Replacement, Virus Scanning, AP 0 0 0 0 0 2,181,000 2,181,000 and Metadirectory Development Upgrade Internet and Intranet, and Implement New Network AP 0 0 0 0 0 539,900 539,900 Technology Department of Administration Subtotal 2,366,900 0 0 250,000 14,893,700 3,000,900 20,511,500 Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development Language Section: Power Cost Equalization AP 3,734,000 0 0 0 0 3,120,000 6,854,000 Securities Database AP 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 300,000 Operation Renew Hope AP 0 500,000 0 0 30,000,000 0 30,500,000 Community Block Grants AP 0 0
    [Show full text]
  • Country IATA ICAO Airport Name Location Served 남극 남극 TNM SCRM Teniente R. Marsh Airport Villa Las Estrellas, Antarctica 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 MDZ SAME Gov
    Continent Country IATA ICAO Airport name Location served 남극 남극 TNM SCRM Teniente R. Marsh Airport Villa Las Estrellas, Antarctica 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 MDZ SAME Gov. Francisco Gabrielli International Airport (El Plumerillo) Mendoza, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 FMA SARF Formosa International Airport (El Pucú Airport) Formosa, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 RSA SAZR Santa Rosa Airport Santa Rosa, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 COC SAAC Concordia Airport (Comodoro Pierrestegui Airport) Concordia, Entre Ríos, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 GHU SAAG Gualeguaychú Airport Gualeguaychú, Entre Ríos, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 JNI SAAJ Junín Airport Junín, Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 MGI SAAK Martín García Island Airport Buenos Aires Province, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 PRA SAAP General Justo José de Urquiza Airport Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 ROS SAAR Rosario - Islas Malvinas International Airport Rosario, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 AEP SABE Jorge Newbery Airpark Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 LCM SACC La Cumbre Airport La Cumbre, Córdoba, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 COR SACO Ingeniero Ambrosio L.V. Taravella International Airport (Pajas Blancas) Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 DOT SADD Don Torcuato International Airport (closed) Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 FDO SADF San Fernando Airport San Fernando, Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 LPG SADL La Plata City International Airport La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 EZE SAEZ Ministro Pistarini International Airport Ezeiza (near Buenos Aires), Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 HOS SAHC Chos Malal Airport (Oscar Reguera Airport) Chos Malal, Neuquén, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 GNR SAHR Dr. Arturo Umberto Illia Airport General Roca, Río Negro, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 APZ SAHZ Zapala Airport Zapala, Neuquén, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 LGS SAMM Comodoro D.
    [Show full text]
  • North Slope Area Plan
    North Slope Area Plan Adopted March 2021 Prepared by: Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Mining, Land and Water Resource Assessment & Development Section North Slope Area Plan Adopted March 2021 Prepared By: Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Mining, Land and Water Resource Assessment & Development Section Photos courtesy of Mark Henspeter This document has been released by the Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land and Water, for the purpose of informing the public about the North Slope Area Plan, at a cost of $20.68 per copy, in Anchorage, Alaska. March 12, 2021 Acknowledgements This is the first area plan for the North Slope area and was developed by the Department of Natural Resources with generous assistance from representatives of several state agencies. The following people contributed their time and technical expertise to provide, review, and discuss plan related information; draft, review, and edit plan text; and assist in resolving plan issues. The Resource Assessment and Development Section staff appreciates the contributions made by its own staff, and by those individuals who took the time to attend meetings, review the document, and provide their input to the Department. DNR, Division of Mining, Land & Water, Resource Assessment & Development Section: Mark Henspeter, Tyler Fanning, Brittany Smith, Emily Hart, Chuck Pinckney, Brandon McCutcheon, Kelsey Anderson, Nina Brudie, Monica Alvarez, Shawana Guzenski, Jacobie Gable. DNR, Division of Mining, Land & Water, Land Conveyances Section: Tim Shilling. DNR, Division of Mining, Land & Water, Northern Regional Land Office: Jeanne Proulx, Dianna Leinberger, Patty Burns, Julie Smith, Melissa Head. DNR, Division of Mining, Land & Water, Mining Section: Stephen Buckley, Russ Kirkham.
    [Show full text]