DOCSLIB.ORG

Alaska Pipeline Project Resource Report No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alaska Pipeline Project Resource Report No Alaska Pipeline Project Resource Report No. 1 Preliminary Draft USAG-UR-SGREG-000002 ALASKA PIPELINE PROJECT USAG-UR-SGREG-000002 PRELIMINARY DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT 1 APRIL 2011 PAGE 1-I Introduction TransCanada Alaska Company, LLC and Foothills Pipe Lines, Ltd., working cooperatively with ExxonMobil, are collectively progressing the Alaska Pipeline Project1. The goal of APP is to treat, transport, and deliver gas from the North Slope of Alaska to markets in North America. This preliminary draft resource report pertains only to that portion of the Project in Alaska. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in the resource reports to APP refer only to the Alaska portion of the project. The pipelines, Gas Treatment Plant, and associated facilities described in this document are based on the estimated volumes of gas from projected customer commitments. If final volumes are significantly different, the design will be adjusted as needed. The location information, facility descriptions, resource impact data, construction methods, and mitigation measures presented in this report are preliminary and subject to change. APP is currently conducting engineering studies, environmental resource surveys, agency consultations, and stakeholder outreach efforts to further refine and define the details of the project. In particular, the route through the following areas is being more closely analyzed: • Alaska’s North Slope, including the Prudhoe Bay Unit Area; • The AtigunPass through the Brooks Range; • The Yukon River crossing; • The City of Fairbanks, including residential and commercial development, and proximity to Eielson Air Force Base; • The Delta Junction area, including waterbody crossings and residential development; • Multiple locations between Delta Junction and the Alaska-Yukon border, including fault crossings; and • The Upper Tanana region near Tetlin. Yellow highlighting is used throughout this preliminary draft Resource Report to highlight selected information that is pending or subject to change. 1 The Alaska Pipeline Project is referred to herein as either APP or the Project. ALASKA PIPELINE PROJECT USAG-UR-SGREG-000002 PRELIMINARY DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT 1 APRIL 2011 PAGE 1-II TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..............................1-1 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW .....................................................................................1-1 1.2 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED ...................................................................1-4 1.3 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ............................................1-4 1.3.1 Pipeline Facilities ...................................................................................1-5 1.3.1.1 Point Thomson Gas Transmission Pipeline .............................1-5 1.3.1.2 Alaska Mainline .......................................................................1-7 1.3.2 Aboveground Facilities ........................................................................1 -10 1.3.2.1 Gas Treatment Plant .............................................................1 -10 1.3.2.2 Pipeline Aboveground Facilities .............................................1 -11 1.3.3 Associated Infrastructure .....................................................................1 -16 1.3.3.1 Gas Treatment Plant .............................................................1 -16 1.3.3.2 Pipeline Facilities ...................................................................1 -17 1.4 LAND REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................1 -25 1.4.1 Pipeline Facilities .................................................................................1 -27 1.4.2 Aboveground Facilities ........................................................................1 -28 1.4.2.1 Gas Treatment Plant .............................................................1 -28 1.4.2.2 Pipeline Aboveground Facilities .............................................1 -29 1.4.3 Associated Infrastructure .....................................................................1 -32 1.4.3.1 Gas Treatment Plant .............................................................1 -32 1.4.3.2 Pipeline Facilities ...................................................................1 -33 1.5 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE .......................................................................1 -37 1.5.1 GTP Site Preparation ..........................................................................1 -38 1.5.2 GTP Site Construction .........................................................................1 -38 1.5.3 Pipeline Construction...........................................................................1 -40 1.6 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES .......................................................................1 -40 1.6.1 Logistics ..............................................................................................1 -40 1.6.1.1 Seasonal Ice-Window Open and Close Dates ....................... 1-42 1.6.1.2 Haul Road Truck Traffic .........................................................1 -42 1.6.1.3 Barge Traffic and Whaling .....................................................1 -42 1.6.2 Typical Pipeline Construction Procedures ...........................................1 -42 1.6.2.1 Surveying ..............................................................................1 -42 1.6.2.2 Clearing .................................................................................1 -44 1.6.2.3 Grading .................................................................................1 -44 1.6.2.4 Ice and Snow Work Pads and Access Roads ........................ 1-45 1.6.2.5 Erosion Control on the Right-of-Way During Construction ..... 1-46 1.6.2.6 Stringing ................................................................................1 -47 1.6.2.7 Bending .................................................................................1 -47 1.6.2.8 Production Welding ............................................................... 1-47 1.6.2.9 Joint Coating .........................................................................1 -47 1.6.2.10 Trenching ..............................................................................1 -48 1.6.2.11 Lowering In, Tie-ins, and Backfilling.......................................1 -48 1.6.2.12 Testing and Final Tie-Ins .......................................................1 -48 1.6.2.13 Cleanup and Rehabilitation ....................................................1 -49 1.6.3 Special Pipeline Construction Procedures ...........................................1 -49 1.6.3.1 Wetland Crossings ................................................................1 -49 ALASKA PIPELINE PROJECT USAG-UR-SGREG-000002 PRELIMINARY DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT 1 APRIL 2011 PAGE 1-III 1.6.3.2 Waterbody Crossings ............................................................1 -50 1.6.3.3 Road and Highway Crossings................................................1 -57 1.6.3.4 Trans Alaska Pipeline System, Utility and Other Pipeline Crossings ..............................................................................1 -58 1.6.3.5 Proximity to Highways, Major Roads, TAPS, and Other Pipelines and Parallel Utilities ................................................1 -59 1.6.3.6 Longitudinal and Cross Slopes ..............................................1 -59 1.6.3.7 Geologic Faults .....................................................................1 -60 1.6.3.8 Agricultural Land....................................................................1 -61 1.6.3.9 Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Areas ...................... 1-61 1.6.3.10 Pipeline Construction in Permafrost .......................................1 -62 1.6.3.11 Blasting .................................................................................1 -63 1.6.3.12 Contaminated Soils ............................................................... 1-63 1.6.4 Aboveground Facility Construction Procedures ...................................1 -63 1.6.4.1 Gas Treatment Plant .............................................................1 -63 1.6.4.2 Compressor Stations .............................................................1 -64 1.6.4.3 Custody Transfer Meter Stations ...........................................1 -64 1.6.4.4 Mainline Block Valves and Launchers and Receivers ............ 1-65 1.6.5 Infrastructure Construction ..................................................................1 -65 1.6.5.1 Gravel Pads ...........................................................................1 -65 1.6.5.2 Borrow Sites ..........................................................................1 -66 1.6.5.3 Access Roads .......................................................................1 -66 1.6.6 Construction Workforce .......................................................................1 -66 1.7 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE, TRAINING, AND INSPECTION .............. 1-67 1.7.1 Environmental Compliance ..................................................................1 -67 1.7.2 Environmental Training ........................................................................1 -67 1.7.3 Environmental Inspection ....................................................................1 -67 1.8 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES ......................................1 -68 1.8.1 Pipeline and Aboveground Facility Operations ....................................1 -68 1.8.1.1 Pipelines, Meter Stations,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joint Land Use Study
    Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study United States Army, Fort Wainwright United States Air Force, Eielson Air Force Base Fairbanks North Star Borough, Planning Department July 2006 Produced by ASCG Incorporated of Alaska Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study Fairbanks Joint Land Use Study This study was prepared under contract with Fairbanks North Star Borough with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content reflects the views of Fairbanks North Star Borough and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment. Historical Hangar, Fort Wainwright Army Base Eielson Air Force Base i Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study Table of Contents 1.0 Study Purpose and Process................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Study Objectives ............................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Planning Area................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Participating Stakeholders.............................................................................................. 4 1.5 Public Participation........................................................................................................ 5 1.6 Issue Identification........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Roadside Salmon Fishing in the Tanana River Drainage
    oadside Salmon Fishing R in the Tanana River Drainage Table of Contents Welcome to Interior Alaska ..........................................................................1 Salmon Biology ...................................................................................................1 Best Places to Fish for King and Chum Salmon ................................................2 Chena River ...............................................................................................2 Salcha River ...............................................................................................3 Other King and Chum Salmon Fisheries .............................................3 Where Can I Catch Coho Salmon? ...............................................................4 cover and front inside photos by: Reed Morisky & Audra Brase The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) administers all programs and activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. The department administers all programs and activities in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Ameri- cans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility please write: ADF&G ADA Coordinator, P.O. Box 115526, Juneau, AK 99811-5526 U.S. Fish
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Management Report for Sport Fisheries in the Yukon Management Area, 2012
    Fishery Management Report No. 14-31 Fishery Management Report for Sport Fisheries in the Yukon Management Area, 2012 by John Burr June 2014 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative all standard mathematical deciliter dL Code AAC signs, symbols and gram g all commonly accepted abbreviations hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., alternate hypothesis HA kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. base of natural logarithm e kilometer km all commonly accepted catch per unit effort CPUE liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., coefficient of variation CV meter m R.N., etc. common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) milliliter mL at @ confidence interval CI millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient east E (multiple) R Weights and measures (English) north N correlation coefficient cubic feet per second ft3/s south S (simple) r foot ft west W covariance cov gallon gal copyright degree (angular ) ° inch in corporate suffixes: degrees of freedom df mile mi Company Co. expected value E nautical mile nmi Corporation Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Flood Insurance Study
    FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR BOROUGH, ALASKA COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR BOROUGH 025009 REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 02090CV000B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE B X C X The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. This FIS report was revised on September 18, 2020. Users should refer to Section 10.0, Revisions Description, for further information. Section 10.0 is intended to present the most up- to-date information for specific portions of this FIS report. Therefore, users of this FIS report should be aware that the information presented in Section 10.0 may supersede information in Sections 1.0 through 9.0 of this FIS report.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska LNG, Docket No. PF14-21-000, Draft Resource Report
    DOCKET NO. PF14-21-000 DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT NO. 5 SOCIOECONOMICS PUBLIC VERSION Document Number: USAKE-PT-SRREG-00-0005 DOCKET NO. PF14-21-000 DOC NO: USAI-EX-SRREG-00-0005 DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT NO. 5 DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 2015 ALASKA LNG SOCIOECONOMICS REVISION: 0 PROJECT PUBLIC VERSION SUMMARY OF FILING INFORMATION RESOURCE REPORT No. 5 SUMMARY OF FILING INFORMATION Filing Requirement Found in Section 1. For major aboveground facilities and major pipeline projects that require an EIS, describe 5.2 and 5.3 existing socioeconomic conditions within the project area. (18 C.F.R. § 380.12(g)(1)) 2. For major aboveground facilities, quantify impact on employment, housing, local government services, local tax revenues, transportation, and other relevant factors within 5.4 through 5.9 the project area. (18 C.F.R. § 380.12(g)(2-6)) Additional Information Often Missing and Resulting in Data Requests Evaluate the impact of any substantial immigration of people on governmental facilities 5.4 and services and describe plans to reduce the impact on local infrastructure. Describe on-site manpower requirements, including the number of construction personnel who currently reside within the impact area, would commute daily to the site from outside 5.4 the impact area, or would relocate temporarily within the impact area. Estimate total worker payroll and material purchases during construction and operation. 5.4 Determine whether existing housing within the impact area is sufficient to meet the needs 5.4 of the additional population. Describe the number and types of residences and businesses that would be displaced by the project, procedures to be used to acquire these properties and types and amounts of TBD relocation assistance payments.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Long-Term Channel Change Through Repeated Cross-Section Surveys at Bridge Crossings in Alaska
    Prepared in cooperation with the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Measurement of Long-Term Channel Change Through Repeated Cross-Section Surveys at Bridge Crossings in Alaska Open-File Report 2019–1028 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Upstream view of a soundings measurement being taken at bridge 339 on the Copper River Delta, Alaska. Photograph by Jeffrey Conaway, U.S. Geological Survey, 2010. Measurement of Long-Term Channel Change Through Repeated Cross-Section Surveys at Bridge Crossings in Alaska By Karenth L. Dworsky and Jeffrey S. Conaway Prepared in cooperation with the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Open-File Report 2019–1028 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Acting Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https:/store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Stock Assessment of Arctic Grayling in the Salcha and Chanatika Rivers
    FISHERY DATA SERIES NO. 74 STOCK ASSESSMENTOF ARCTIC GRAYLING IN THE SALCHA AND CHATANIKA RIVERS' BY Robert A. Clark Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish Juneau, Alaska 99802 December 1988 ' This investigation was partially financed by the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 777-777K) under Project F-10-4, Job No. G-8-l. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game operates all of its public programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, age, sex, or handicap. Because the department receives federal funding, any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against should write to: O.E.O. U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 I TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES............................................... ii LIST OF FIGURES .............................................. iii LIST OF APPENDICES ........................................... iv ABSTRACT..................................................... INTRODUCTION................................................. Fishery Descriptions.................................... Salcha River ....................................... 2 Chatanika River .................................... 4 METHODS...................................................... 7 Estimation of Abundance - Salcha River.................. 7 Estimation of Age and Size Composition.................. 11 Salcha River ....................................... 11 Chatanika River .................................... 12 Estimation
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H Draft Plan of Development
    DOCKET NO. CP17-___-000 DOC NO: USAI-PE-SRREG-00- RESOURCE REPORT NO. 8 000008-000 ALASKA LNG APPENDIX H – DRAFT PLAN OF DATE: APRIL 14, 2017 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REVISION: 0 PUBLIC APPENDIX H DRAFT PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT DRAFT PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT AKLNG-6020-REG-PLN-DOC-00029 AKLNG-6020-REG-PLN-DOC-00029 PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT 4-APR-17 REVISION: 0 PUBLIC PAGE 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 SUMMARY OF PROJECT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................ 8 1.3 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION AND REVISION .............................................................................. 8 2.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION ................................................................................... 9 2.1 EXPECTED PUBLIC BENEFITS ............................................................................................... 10 2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Overview .............................................................................................................. 10 2.3 COMMODITY AND PURPOSE ................................................................................................. 12 3.0 PROJECT LOCATION AND LAND REQUIREMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 2 Land Management Policies for Each Management Unit 3 4 Introduction
    1 Chapter 3 2 Land Management Policies for Each Management Unit 3 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 5 Organization of Chapter ...................................................................................................... 2 6 Land Use Designations ....................................................................................................... 2 7 Map 3: Planning Area and Regions ............................................................................. 3 8 Designations Used in This Plan .......................................................................................... 5 9 Explanation of Habitat Designations .................................................................................. 9 10 Explanation of Oil and Gas Designation .......................................................................... 10 11 Resources and Uses and Management Intent .................................................................... 10 12 Duration and Flexibility of Plan ....................................................................................... 11 13 Glossary ............................................................................................................................ 12 14 Plan Structure .......................................................................................................................... 12 15 Plan Regions ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2004-2006 STIP Phases
    2004-2006 STIP National Highway System draft DRAFT STIP Req'd Funding >6 Need ID Highway Location Project Description/Funding Source Phse Apprn FFY 04 FFY 05 FFY 06 FFY 07 FFY 08 FFY 09FFY 10 years 10547 Alaska MP 1222 to 1235 Rehabilitation - (Border West) 2 500.0 410.0 Leveling and resurfacing. 4 9,000.0 Federal IM 0.0 0.0 467.0 382.9 8,406.0 0.0 State 0.0 0.0 33.0 27.1 594.0 0.0 Other Project Total 0.0 0.0 500.0 410.0 9,000.0 0.0 0.0 10548 Alaska MP 1256 to 1270 Rehab - Lakeview - Northway Jct. 2 560.0 Leveling and Resurfacing. 4 Federal IM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 509.4 State 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.6 Other Project Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 560.0 7,000.0 6088 Alaska MP 1270 to 1314 Rehabilitation - Northway Junction to Tok 2 150.0 Relevel, resurface and install WIM - Northway Junction to Tok. 4 7,770.0 Federal IM 0.0 140.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 State 0.0 9.9 7,770.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other Project Total 0.0 150.0 7,770.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7367 Alaska MP 1308 - Tok Weigh Station 2 200.0 New weighing system facility to facilitate simultaneous axle group and gross weight indications for truck weight enforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Zones of Restricted Activity for Protection of Key Fish Areas Along
    #-. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management BLM Alaska Open File Report 104 BLM/AK/ST-06/003+6674+990 December 2005 Zones of Restricted Activity for Protection of Key Fish Areas Along the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System on Federally Administered Lands Third Edition Alaska U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMMENT Mission Statement The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) sustains the health, diversity and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Cover This pond, adjacent to the upper Atigun River drainage north of the Brooks Range, is ice-free all winter because of the pipeline’s thermal regime. It is used by Arctic grayling for rearing and overwintering. Alyeska Pipeline Service Company constructed a channel between the pond and the Atigun River so fish can freely use the pond all year. Photo by Dennis Gnath. Open File Reports Open file reports present the results of inventories or other investigations published outside the formal BLM-Alaska technical publication series. These reports can include preliminary or incomplete data and are not published and distributed in quantity. Reports are available while supplies last from BLM External Affairs, 222 West 7th Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513 (907) 271-5555 and from the Juneau Minerals Information Center, 100 Savikko Road, Mayflower Island, Douglas,AK 99824, (907) 364-1553. Copies are also available for inspection at the Alaska Resource Library and Information Service (Anchorage), the United States Department of the Interior Resources Library in Washington D.C., various libraries of the University of Alaska, the BLM National Business Center Library (Denver), and other selected locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon and Kuskokwim Whitefish Strategic Plan
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Whitefish Biology, Distribution, and Fisheries in the Yukon and Kuskokwim River Drainages in Alaska: a Synthesis of Available Information Alaska Fisheries Data Series Number 2012-4 Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office Fairbanks, Alaska May 2012 The Alaska Region Fisheries Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service conducts fisheries monitoring and population assessment studies throughout many areas of Alaska. Dedicated professional staff located in Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Kenai Fish and Wildlife Offices and the Anchorage Conservation Genetics Laboratory serve as the core of the Program’s fisheries management study efforts. Administrative and technical support is provided by staff in the Anchorage Regional Office. Our program works closely with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and other partners to conserve and restore Alaska’s fish populations and aquatic habitats. Our fisheries studies occur throughout the 16 National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska as well as off- Refuges to address issues of interjurisdictional fisheries and aquatic habitat conservation. Additional information about the Fisheries Program and work conducted by our field offices can be obtained at: http://alaska.fws.gov/fisheries/index.htm The Alaska Region Fisheries Program reports its study findings through the Alaska Fisheries Data Series (AFDS) or in recognized peer-reviewed journals. The AFDS was established to provide timely dissemination of data to fishery managers and other technically oriented professionals, for inclusion in agency databases, and to archive detailed study designs and results for the benefit of future investigations. Publication in the AFDS does not preclude further reporting of study results through recognized peer-reviewed journals.
    [Show full text]