DOCSLIB.ORG

Compatibility of Seed Head Biological Control Agents and Mowing for Management of Spotted Knapweed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Compatibility of Seed Head Biological Control Agents and Mowing for Management of Spotted Knapweed PEST MANAGEMENT Compatibility of Seed Head Biological Control Agents and Mowing for Management of Spotted Knapweed 1 JIM M. STORY, JANELLE G. CORN, AND LINDA J. WHITE Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, Western Agricultural Research Center, 580 Quast Ln., Corvallis, MT 59828 Environ. Entomol. 39(1): 164Ð168 (2010); DOI: 10.1603/EN09123 ABSTRACT Field studies were conducted at two sites in western Montana during 2006 and 2008 to assess the compatibility of mowing with Þve seed head insect species introduced for biological control of spotted knapweed, Centaurea stoebe Lamarck subsp. micranthos. In 2006, mowing of spotted knapweed plants at the bolting and ßower bud stages resulted in the development of new seed heads that contained signiÞcantly more seeds and signiÞcantly fewer larvae of each insect species than in seed heads in unmowed controls. No seed heads were produced in the plots mowed at the ßowering stage. Seed numbers per seed head in 2008 were also signiÞcantly higher in plots mowed at the bolting stage than in unmowed controls, but between-treatment differences in insect numbers were more variable. The seed head insects Larinus spp. and Urophora affinis Frauenfeld were the primary cause of the reduced knapweed seed numbers per seed head in 2006. Spotted knapweed should not be mowed at the bolting and ßower bud stages if large populations of seed head insects are present because mowing can result in the formation of new seed heads that are free from the insectsÕ attack, thus allowing greater seed production. Mowing of spotted knapweed at the ßowering stage and later can be conducted without a subsequent increase in seed production, but the mowing may cause mortality of the insect larvae. KEY WORDS Centaurea stoebe, seed production, mowing, Urophora affinis, Larinus spp. Spotted knapweed, Centaurea stoebe Lamarck subsp. (Story et al. 1989, 1991, 2006, 2008; Smith and Mayer micranthos (Gugler) Hayek (formerly C. maculosa 2005; Seastedt et al. 2007). These insects include two Lamarck) (Ochsmann 2001), is a perennial plant from seed head ßies, Urophora affinis Frauenfeld and U. Eurasia that has become a serious weed on rangelands quadrifasciata (Meigen) (Diptera: Tephritidae), a of the northwestern United States. First reported in seed head moth, Metzneria paucipunctella Zeller (Lep- North America in 1893 (Groh 1944), the plant now idoptera: Gelechiidae), and two seed head weevils, infests Ͼ3,000,000 ha of rangeland and pasture in 14 Larinus obtusus Gyllenhal and L. minutus Gyllenhal states and 2 Canadian provinces (Lacey 1989, Sheley (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). A combination of U. af- et al. 1998). Spotted knapweed reduces livestock and finis and the two Larinus spp. caused a 96% reduction wildlife forage (Thompson 1996, Watson and Renney in knapweed seed production in western Montana 1974), increases surface water runoff and soil sedi- (Story et al. 2008). mentation (Lacey et al. 1989), and reduces plant di- Mowing has limitations but has been used with some versity (Tyser and Key 1988). success against noxious weeds. The method can pre- Many control options are effective against spotted vent seed production, reduce carbohydrate reserves, knapweed, including herbicides, grazing, tillage, and give competitive advantages to desirable peren- mowing, and biological control (Sheley et al. 1998; nial grasses (DiTomaso 2000, Jacobs 2007). Sheley Duncan et al. 2001, Jacobs 2007). However, chemical (2002) reported that mowing of spotted knapweed at and many cultural practices are often very expensive, the ßowering stage decreased mature plant density by temporary, and usually limited to accessible areas. Ϸ85%. Watson and Renney (1974) reported that the Considerable work has been conducted on the use number of seed-producing spotted and diffuse knap- of host-speciÞc natural enemies to biologically control weed plants was signiÞcantly reduced by mowing at spotted knapweed. Twelve Eurasian insect species the ßower bud stage, the ßowering stage, or at both the have been introduced into Montana and the PaciÞc ßower bud and ßowering stage. Seed germination was Northwest for biological control of the plant. Of these, signiÞcantly reduced by mowing at the ßowering stage Þve species of seed-head insects are causing signiÞcant (Watson and Renney 1974). However, under favor- reductions in spotted knapweed seed production able conditions, spotted knapweed will produce new ßower buds after mowing. Story et al. (2008) reported 1 Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]. that, because ßower buds initiated after mowing gen- 0046-225X/10/0164Ð0168$04.00/0 ᭧ 2010 Entomological Society of America February 2010 STORY ET AL.: COMPATIBILITY OF INSECTS AND MOWING FOR KNAPWEED MANAGEMENT 165 erally develop after oviposition by the seed head in- mowed on 30 June ßower bud stage, Þve were mowed sects is completed, those ßower buds escape attack on 21 July (ßowering stage), and Þve plots were not and thus produce a normal complement of seeds. mowed. Fifty seed heads were collected per unmowed The objective of this study was to determine control plots on 29 July, whereas available seed heads whether mowing could be timed so that any ßower from the plots mowed in the bolting stage were col- buds produced after mowing would not escape attack lected on 1 and 4 August. No ßower buds were pro- by the seed head insects. We predicted that ßower duced in the plots mowed at the ßower bud and buds produced on plants mowed at the bolting, ßower ßowering stages. bud, or ßowering stages would escape insect attack Unrue. The Unrue site was a natural spotted knap- and thus produce a full complement of seeds. weed infestation on a south-facing slope, located 3.2 km east of Corvallis. In 2006, Þve 7 by 1-m strips were Materials and Methods mowed at a 15-cm height with hedge shears on 3 July at the ßower bud stage. Fifty seed heads from each of The study was conducted at two sites in western Þve unmowed strips were randomly collected on 4 Montana during 2006 and 2008. The study was con- August, whereas 50 seed heads from each of the Þve ducted at the Montana State UniversityÐWestern Ag- mowed plots were similarly collected on 28 August. ricultural Research Center (WARC), Corvallis, MT, The seed heads were processed in the laboratory using during both years. The study was also conducted at a the above-mentioned procedures. This site received Þeld site in 2006 (Unrue, Corvallis, MT). only natural precipitation. WARC. The WARC site, located 3.2 km northeast of Statistical Analysis. Spotted knapweed seed num- Corvallis, was a level, arable Þeld. In 2006, treatment bers and insect numbers per seed head were analyzed plots were established within a large (64 by 41 m) by analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedures, and spotted knapweed garden that received some irriga- means were compared using least signiÞcant differ- tion during the growing season. Each plot consisted of ence (LSD; Statistix 8 2003). The data were trans- a 7-m portion of a row in the knapweed garden, with formed by ͱ͑y ϩ 0.5) before the ANOVA to improve each plot randomly located in a different row. Spotted normality (Sokal and Rohlf 1981). Multiple regression knapweed plants were mowed in Þve plots on one of three dates representing different developmental analysis was used to describe the relationship between stages: 8 June (bolting stage), 29 June (ßower bud individual insect species numbers and seed numbers stage), and 20 July (ßowering stage), for a total of 20 per seed head. plots (including 5 unmowed control plots). Mowing at the bolting stage occurred when Ͼ80% of the plants were bolting, whereas mowing at the ßower bud and Results and Discussion ßowering stages was conducted when Ͼ50% of the plants contained ßower buds or ßowers, respectively. WARC. In 2006, spotted knapweed seed numbers Mowing consisted of cutting the plants 15 cm above per seed head in plots mowed at the bolting stage (8 June) and the ßower bud stage (29 June) were sig- ground with hedge shears. Fifty spotted knapweed ϭ seed heads were randomly collected from each of the niÞcantly higher than in unmowed controls (F ϭ Ͻ Þve unmowed controls on 3 August, just before the 111.0; df 2,12; P 0.001; Table 1). Seed numbers per seed heads opening for seed dispersal. The two nearest seed head in the plots mowed at the bolting stage were seed heads on every fourth plant were collected along signiÞcantly higher than in plots mowed at the ßower a transect through the plots until a total of 50 seed bud stage. As previously mentioned, no ßower buds heads had been collected. Similarly, because of the were produced in the plots mowed at the ßowering mowing-caused delay in development of the seed stage. The numbers of each of the four insect species heads, 50 seed heads were randomly collected on 15 and all four insect species combined (total insects) per August from each of the Þve plots mowed at the seed head were signiÞcantly higher in the unmowed bolting stage and on 18 August from the Þve plots control plots than in the mowed plots(for U. affinis, mowed at the ßower bud stage. No ßower buds were F ϭ 38.8; df ϭ 2,12; P Ͻ 0.001; for U. quadrifasciata, F ϭ produced in the plots mowed at the ßowering stage. 8.7; df ϭ 2,12; P ϭ 0.005; for Larinus spp., F ϭ 17.4; df ϭ The collected seed heads were individually stored in 2,12; P Ͻ 0.001; for M. paucipunctella, F ϭ 7.4; small envelopes in the laboratory until October, when df ϭ 2,12; P ϭ 0.008; and for total insects, F ϭ 52.5; df ϭ the seed heads were examined under a dissecting 2,12; P Ͻ 0.001).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Influence of Seed Head–Attacking Biological Control Agents
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROLÑWEEDS Influence of Seed Head–Attacking Biological Control Agents on Spotted Knapweed Reproductive Potential in Western Montana Over a 30-Year Period 1,2 3 1 1 JIM M. STORY, LINCOLN SMITH, JANELLE G. CORN, AND LINDA J. WHITE Environ. Entomol. 37(2): 510Ð519 (2008) ABSTRACT Five insect biological control agents that attack ßower heads of spotted knapweed, Centaurea stoebe L. subsp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek, became established in western Montana between 1973 and 1992. In a controlled Þeld experiment in 2006, seed-head insects reduced spotted knapweed seed production per seed head by 84.4%. The seed production at two sites in western Montana where these biological control agents were well established was 91.6Ð93.8% lower in 2004Ð2005 than 1974Ð1975, whereas the number of seed heads per square meter was 70.7% lower, and the reproductive potential (seeds/m2) was 95.9Ð99.0% lower. The average seed bank in 2005 at four sites containing robust spotted knapweed populations was 281 seeds/m2 compared with 19 seeds/m2 at four sites where knapweed density has declined. Seed bank densities were much higher at sites in central Montana (4,218 seeds/m2), where the insects have been established for a shorter period. Urophora affinis Frauenfeld was the most abundant species at eight study sites, infesting 66.7% of the seed heads, followed by a 47.3% infestation by Larinus minutus Gyllenhal and L. obtusus Gyllenhal. From 1974 to 1985, Urophora spp. apparently reduced the number of seeds per seed head by 34.5Ð46.9%; the addition of Larinus spp. further reduced seed numbers 84.2Ð90.5% by 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO
    Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area August 2015 CNHP’s mission is to preserve the natural diversity of life by contributing the essential scientific foundation that leads to lasting conservation of Colorado's biological wealth. Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 1475 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, CO 80523 (970) 491-7331 Report Prepared for: United States Air Force Academy Department of Natural Resources Recommended Citation: Smith, P., S. S. Panjabi, and J. Handwerk. 2015. Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Front Cover: Documenting weeds at the US Air Force Academy. Photos courtesy of the Colorado Natural Heritage Program © Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area El Paso County, CO Pam Smith, Susan Spackman Panjabi, and Jill Handwerk Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Various federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, orders, and policies require land managers to control noxious weeds. The purpose of this plan is to provide a guide to manage, in the most efficient and effective manner, the noxious weeds on the US Air Force Academy (Academy) and Farish Recreation Area (Farish) over the next 10 years (through 2025), in accordance with their respective integrated natural resources management plans. This plan pertains to the “natural” portions of the Academy and excludes highly developed areas, such as around buildings, recreation fields, and lawns.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Knapweeds
    Biology, Ecology and Management of Montana Knapweeds EB0204 revised August 2017 Celestine Duncan, Consultant, Weed Management Services, Helena, MT Jim Story, Research Professor, retired, MSU Western Ag Research Center, Corvallis, MT Roger Sheley, former MSU Extension Weed Specialist, Bozeman, MT revised by Hilary Parkinson, former MSU Research Associate, and Jane Mangold, MSU Extension Invasive Plant Specialist Table of Contents Plant Biology . 3 SpeedyWeed ID . 5 Ecology . 4 Habitat . 4 Spread and Establishment Potential . 6 Damage Potential . 7 Origins, Current Status and Distribution . 8 Management Alternatives . 8 Prevention . 8 Mechanical Control . .9 Cultural Control . .10 Biological Control . .11 Chemical Control . .14 Integrated Weed Management (IWM) . 16 Additional Resources . 17 Acknowledgements . .19 COVER PHOTOS large - spotted knapweed by Marisa Williams, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, bugwood.org top inset - diffuse knapweed by Cindy Roche, bugwood.org bottom inset - Russain knapweed by Steve Dewey, Utah State University, bugwood.org Any mention of products in this publication does not constitute a recommendation by Montana State University Extension. It is a violation of Federal law to use herbicides in a manner inconsistent with their labeling. Copyright © 2017 MSU Extension The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Montana State University and Montana State University Extension prohibit discrimination in all of their programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital and family status. Issued in furtherance of cooperative extension work in agriculture and home economics, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Jeff Bader, Director of Extension, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717.
    [Show full text]
  • Centaurea Stoebe Ssp. Micranthos
    Species: Centaurea stoebe ssp. micranthos http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/forb/cenmac/all.html SPECIES: Centaurea maculosa Introductory Distribution and occurrence Management Considerations Botanical and ecological characteristics Fire ecology Fire effects References INTRODUCTORY SPECIES: Centaurea maculosa AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION FEIS ABBREVIATION SYNONYMS NRCS PLANT CODE COMMON NAMES TAXONOMY LIFE FORM FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS OTHER STATUS AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION: Zouhar, Kris. 2001. Centaurea maculosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2007, September 24]. FEIS ABBREVIATION: CENMAC SYNONYMS: Centaurea biebersteinii DC. [82] Centaurea stoebe L. ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek [137] NRCS PLANT CODE [212]: CEBI2 1 of 58 9/24/2007 4:04 PM Species: Centaurea stoebe ssp. micranthos http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/forb/cenmac/all.html COMMON NAMES: spotted knapweed TAXONOMY: The scientific name for spotted knapweed is Centaurea maculosa Lam. (Asteraceae) [45,67,217,233]. Oschmann [137] suggests that in North America, the name Centaurea maculosa has been misapplied to Centaurea stoebe ssp. micranthos. The taxonomy of spotted knapweed is discussed in Ochsmann [137] and on the Centaurea website. Oschsmann [136] also cites evidence of hybridization between spotted and diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) in at least 7 U.S. states. The hybrid is named Centaurea × psammogena Gayer. LIFE FORM: Forb FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS: No special status OTHER STATUS: Spotted knapweed has been declared a noxious or restricted weed in at least 15 states in the U.S. and 4 Canadian provinces [213].
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Insects, Primarily Impacts of Biological Control Organisms and Their Parasitoids, Associated with Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea Stoebe L
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2004 Assessment of Insects, Primarily Impacts of Biological Control Organisms and Their Parasitoids, Associated with Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea stoebe L. s. l.) in Eastern Tennessee Amy Lynn Kovach University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Kovach, Amy Lynn, "Assessment of Insects, Primarily Impacts of Biological Control Organisms and Their Parasitoids, Associated with Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea stoebe L. s. l.) in Eastern Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2004. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2267 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Amy Lynn Kovach entitled "Assessment of Insects, Primarily Impacts of Biological Control Organisms and Their Parasitoids, Associated with Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea stoebe L. s. l.) in Eastern Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Entomology and Plant Pathology. Jerome F. Grant, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Paris L. Lambdin, B. Eugene Wofford Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 SPOTTED KNAPWEED PEST STATUS of WEED Nature Of
    In: Van Driesche, R., et al., 2002, Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States, USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04, 413 p. 13 SPOTTED KNAPWEED J. Story Montana State University, Western Agricultural Research Center, Corvallis, Montana, USA runoff and soil sedimentation (Lacey et al., 1989), and PEST STATUS OF WEED lowers plant diversity (Tyser and Key, 1988). Spot- Spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa Lamarck, is ted knapweed produces an allelopathic compound a purple-flowered, herbaceous, perennial weed, liv- that reduces germination of some grass species ing three to five years on average. It infests semiarid (Kelsey and Locken, 1987). range lands in the western United States and road- Geographical Distribution sides and fields in the eastern part of the country. Infested areas are dominated by the plant, reducing Spotted knapweed is native to Europe and western their grazing value and suppressing native plant com- Asia but has become widespread in parts of the munities. The plant, originally from Central Asia, has United States and Canada. The plant occurs through- been in North America for over 120 years. out the United States except for Alaska, Texas, Okla- homa, Mississippi, and Georgia (USDA, NRCS, Nature of Damage 2001). The plant is a serious invader of rangeland in Economic damage. Spotted knapweed is a serious the Rocky Mountain region. In Montana alone, the problem on rangeland, especially in the western plant infests an estimated 1.9 million ha of rangeland United States. Bucher (1984) estimated that an and pasture (Lacey, 1989). In Canada, the plant is 800,000 ha infestation in Montana was causing $4.5 abundant in British Columbia, and is common in million in annual forage losses, and that invasion of Ontario, Quebec, and the Maritimes (Watson and 13.6 million ha of vulnerable rangeland in Montana Renney, 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guidecontrol of Weeds
    US Department of Agriculture FOR THE BIOLOGICALFIELD GUIDECONTROL OF WEEDS IN THE NORTHWEST Rachel Winston, Carol Bell Randall, Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate, Alec McClay, Jennifer Andreas and Mark Schwarzländer Forest Health Technology FHTET-2014-08 Enterprise Team May 2014 he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in T1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ Cover photos: Aphthona nigriscutis (R. Richard, USDA APHIS), Mecinus spp. (Bob Richard, USDA APHIS PPQ), Chrysolina hypericic quadrigemina, Eustenopus villosus (Laura Parsons & Mark Schwarzländer, University of Idaho), Cyphocleonus achates (Jennifer Andreas, Washington State University Extension) The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326- W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to the Biological Control of Weeds in British Columbia
    forestryweeds7.qxd 11/14/99 7:42 PM Page 109 BEETLE Galerucella pusilla (Duftsschmid) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) DESCRIPTION AND LIFE CYCLE Adults, 2±4 mm long, and larvae very closely resemble G. calmariensis. Refer to G. calmariensis photos for identification. Adults emerge from hibernation and feed on shoot tips and young leaves in April. Mating begins immediately, with egg laying starting approximately 1 week later and continuing until the end of July. Larvae hatch 12 days after egg laying; larvae develop over the next 2 weeks feeding first on leaf and flower buds and then on all parts of the plant in the later stages of development. Mature larvae leave the plant and pupate in leaf litter and the upper portion of the soil. Adults emerge 9±11 days later. Adults that emerge before August mate and lay eggs for a 1 month period. Adults feed on foliage and hibernate in the soil before winter. WEED ATTACKED Purple loosestrife. HABITAT Egg laying is strongly curtailed by low temperatures. Tolerates the variety of habitat conditions in which purple loosestrife is found. COLLECTION, SHIPPING, AND HANDLING Collect with the sweep net technique and use standard shipping and handling procedures. RELEASE Follow standard release procedures for insects. Take precautions not to dump the beetles in the water. MONITORING Determine presence by looking for adults on foliage in April or August. REFERENCE Blossey, B. and D. Schroeder. 1991. Study of potential biological control agents of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.). Final Report. European Station Report. C.A.B. International Institute of Biological Control, Delemont, Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Site Release Strategies and Impact of Biological Control Agents on Spotted Knapweed, Centaurea Maculosa
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 2000 Optimal site release strategies and impact of biological control agents on spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa. Sheryl Clark University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Clark, Sheryl, "Optimal site release strategies and impact of biological control agents on spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa." (2000). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 3080. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/3080 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OPTIMAL SITE RELEASE STRATEGIES AND IMPACT OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS ON SPOTTED KNAPWEED, CENTAUREA MACULOSA A Thesis Presented by SHERYL CLARK Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTERS OF ENTOMOLOGY September 2000 Department of Entomology OPTIMAL SITE RELEASE STRATEGIES AND IMPACT OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS ON SPOTTED KNAPWEED, CENTAUREA MACULOSA A Thesis Presented by SHERYL CLARK Approved as to style and content by: 4 Joseph Elkinton, Member aL g. John G. Stoffolano, Acting Department Head Department of Entomology ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my thesis committee chair Dr. Roy Van Driesche for all of his contributions and support. Aside from providing advice, guidance, encouragement and support, he believed in my abilities to accomplish this Masters project. I also want to thank Dr. Joseph Elkinton and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Suppliers of Beneficial Organisms in North America
    SUPPLIERS OF BENEFICIAL ORGANISMS IN NORTH AMERICA Charles D. Hunter Hippodamia convergens – Convergent ladybird beetle larva Actual size = 7-10 mm in length California Environmental Protection Agency DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch 1997 Edition Pete Wilson, Governor State of California Peter M. Rooney, Acting Secretary California Environmental Protection Agency James W. Wells, Director Department of Pesticide Regulation ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank Dr. Javier Trujillo Arriaga, Director General of Sanidad Vegetal de Mexico; Dr. Gustavo A. Frias Trevino, Director of the Centro Nacional de Referencia Fitosanitaria; and M.C. Hugo Cesar Arredondo Bernal, Sub Director of the Centro Nacional de Referencia de Control Biologico, for the information they have provided on commercial suppliers of benefical organisms in Mexico. I also thank Dr. Michael J. Oraze, Acting Director of the National Biologicial Control Institute (USDA, APHIS, PPQ), for his review and support; Daniel Cahn, President of the Association of Natural Bio- control Producers, for his review and technical input; Larry Bezark, Biological Control Program (California Department of Food and Agriculture), for his review and technical input; Department of Pesticide Regulation staff members -- Lyndon Hawkins and Drs. Madeline Brattesani and Larry Wilhoit for their reviews, technical input, and helpful comments; Angelica Marin Welsh for her assistance with Spanish communications and translations; Susan E. Swanberg for her assistance in collecting data and doing much of the work in compiling this listing, her dedication to the project, and for all of her many helpful suggestions. This material was made possible, in part, by a grant from the United States Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ), National Biological Control Institute (NBCI).
    [Show full text]
  • Metzneria Lappella (PDF)
    Metzneria lappella L. INVASIVE SPECIES ATTACKED: Common burdock (Arctium minus (Hill) Bernh) Great burdock (A. lappa L.) TYPE OF AGENT: Seedhead feeding moth COLLECTABILITY: Not permitted ORIGIN: Eurasia DESCRIPTION AND LIFE CYCLE Adult: Metzneria lappella adults have a wing span of 1.2 to 1.9 cm and are generally light yellow–tan coloured with variability in the streaking and colour pattern8. The forewing is tan with yellow–brown streaks with heavy streaking occurring along the front margin (costa, one of the major longitudinal veins). A row of short diagonal streaks run toward the inner forewing margin where the costal vein and the outer margin of the forewing meet. A slight arc may also occur between one to two thirds of the wing length and a dark spot is located along the inner margin of the wing. The hind wing is lance–shaped with a wide fringe. The top of the head and thorax are pale coloured with a thin dark line running down the center. The labium palps (sensory segmented appendages arising from the mouth parts used for tasting food) are long and recurved over the head and their antennae are long and have many narrow dark rings5. M. lappella is capable of only one generation per year5, 10. In the northern parts of their distribution, the adult moths begin to emerge in late June and continue to do so through the first three weeks of July then lay their eggs into the developing flowerheads. In the south, adults may emerge from April to August5, 8. Research indicates the unpredictability of seed production causes the emergence of adult M.
    [Show full text]