DOCSLIB.ORG

Field Guide for the Biological Control of Weeds in Eastern North America

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Field Guide for the Biological Control of Weeds in Eastern North America US Department TECHNOLOGY of Agriculture TRANSFER FIELD GUIDE FOR THE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WEEDS IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA Rachel L. Winston, Carol B. Randall, Bernd Blossey, Philip W. Tipping, Ellen C. Lake, and Judy Hough-Goldstein Forest Health Technology FHTET-2016-04 Enterprise Team April 2017 The Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ Cover photos: Purple loosestrife (Jennifer Andreas, Washington State University Extension), Galerucella calmariensis (David Cappaert, Michigan State University, bugwood.org), tropical soda apple ((J. Jeffrey Mullahey, University of Florida, bugwood.org), Gratiana boliviana (Rodrigo Diaz, Louisiana State University), waterhyacinth (Chris Evans, University of Illinois, bugwood.org), Megamelus scutellaris (Jason D. Stanley, USDA ARS, bugwood.org), mile-a-minute weed (Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, bugwood.org), Rhinoncomimus latipes (Amy Diercks, bugwood.org) How to cite this publication: Winston, R.L., C.B. Randall, B. Blossey, P.W. Tipping, E.C. Lake, and J. Hough-Goldstein. 2017. Field Guide for the Biological Control of Weeds in Eastern North America. USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia. FHTET-2016-04. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. Federal Recycling Program Printed on Recycled Paper BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WEEDS IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA Rachel L. Winston Carol Bell Randall Environmental Consultant Entomologist, Forest Health Protection MIA Consulting, LLC USDA Forest Service Sandpoint, ID Coeur d’Alene, ID [email protected] [email protected] Bernd Blossey Philip W. Tipping Associate Professor for Natural Resources Research Leader Cornell University, Department of USDA-ARS Invasive Plant Research Lab Natural Resources Fort Lauderdale, FL Ithaca, NY [email protected] [email protected] Ellen C. Lake Judy Hough-Goldstein Research Entomologist Professor for Entomology USDA-ARS Invasive Plant Research Lab University of Delaware, Department of Fort Lauderdale, FL Entomology & Wildlife Ecology [email protected] Newark, DE [email protected] For additional copies of this publication, contact: Richard Reardon Carol Bell Randall FHTET Forest Health Protection USDA Forest Service USDA Forest Service 180 Canfield Street 2502 E. Sherman Ave. Morgantown, WV 26505 Coeur d’Alene, ID 83814 304.285.1566 208.769-3051 [email protected] [email protected] Acknowledgments Significant help in reviewing and compiling select content in this field guide was provided by Robert Bourchier (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada), William L. Bruckart, III (USDA, ARS, FDWSRU), Greg Wheeler (USDA ARS), and Donald Davis (The Pennsylvania State University). Some of the material in this guide was revised from the sister guide “Biological Control of Weeds in the Northwest”. We acknowledge and express our appreciation for the additional authors of that guide: Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate, Alec McClay, Jennifer Andreas, and Mark Schwarzlaender. The layout of this guide was designed by Rachel Winston. We would like to thank all of the photographers who granted permission for the use of photos. We also extend our gratitude to Richard Reardon (Forest Service-Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team) for producing this guide. Field Guide Components Efficacy Quick Reference Guide 4 Introduction 8 About This Field Guide 8 Biological Control of Weeds 10 Selected Plant Features 12 Life Cycle 12 Duration 12 Typical Leaf Arrangement and Margination 13 Flower Heads 13 Biological Control Agent Life Cycles 14 Insects 14 Mites 16 Nematodes 16 Fungi 16 Table of Contents of Table Scientific Name Changes 17 Collection Methods 18 Transport Considerations 20 Releasing Biocontrol Agents 22 Monitoring Biocontrol Agents 24 Additional Considerations 27 Weed Biocontrol Systems 28 Weed species are arranged first by flower color, then grouped by related species and listed alphabetically. All biocontrol agents introduced or established on each weed are included in that weed’s section, listed according to efficacy on the target weed. To look up a particular biocontrol agent or weed, refer to the index at the back of this guide. Pinkish-Purple Flowers 28 Knapweeds 28 Diffuse knapweed, Centaurea diffusa 30 Spotted knapweed, Centaurea stoebe 32 Purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria 62 Eurasian watermilfoil, Myriophyllum spicatum 70 Swallow-worts 74 Black swallow-wort, Vincetoxicum nigrum 74 Pale swallow-wort, Vincetoxicum rossicum 76 Thistles 80 Bull thistle, Cirsium vulgare 82 Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense 84 Musk thistle, Carduus nutans 86 Waterhyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes 108 Yellow Flowers 118 Table of Contents of Table Tansy ragwort, Jacobaea vulgaris 118 Common St. Johnswort, Hypericum perforatum 130 Toadflaxes 142 Dalmatian toadflax, Linaria dalmatica 142 Yellow toadflax, Linaria vulgaris 144 Green Flowers 160 Mile-a-minute weed, Persicaria perfoliata 160 Spurges 164 Cypress spurge, Euphorbia crassipes 164 Leafy spurge, Euphorbia esula 166 Tree-of-heaven, Ailanthus altissima 190 White Flowers 194 Alligatorweed, Alternanthera philoxeroides 194 Scentless chamomile, Tripleurospermum inodorum 202 Poison hemlock, Conium maculatum 210 Hydrilla, Hydrilla verticillata 214 Knotweeds 222 Bohemian knotweed, Fallopia xbohemica 222 Giant knotweed, Fallopia sachalinensis 224 Japanese knotweed, Fallopia japonica 226 Melaleuca, Melaleuca quinquenervia 230 Multiflora rose, Rosa multiflora 240 Brazilian peppertree, Schinus terebinthifolius 244 Tropical soda apple, Solanum viarum 248 Waterlettuce, Pistia stratiotes 254 Does not or Rarely Flowers 260 Air-potato, Dioscorea bulbifera 260 Old World climbing fern, Lygodium microphyllum 264 Salvinias 272 Common salvinia, Salvinia minima 272 Giant salvinia, Salvinia molesta 274 Current Studies in Weed Biocontrol 278 Glossary 282 Selected References 290 Appendix 326 Biocontrol Agent Monitoring Form 326 Vegetation Monitoring Form 327 Species Index 328 Efficacy Quick Reference Guide In this quick reference, weed species are arranged in the order they appear in this guide: first by flower color, grouped by related species, and then listed alphabetically. Weeds that do not flower are colored gray. The biocontrol agents presently available (as of 2016) for each weed are then arranged according to their individual efficacy. Please note that efficacy designations are very broad. Some biocontrol agents thrive in certain settings and are ineffective in others. The following broad categories are used: US Can Individual Biocontrol Agent Status High priority; recommended for release/redistribution Medium priority, recommended to complement other agents or control methods Quick Reference Quick Low priority; typically low impact and/or survival Caution when redistributing; not recommended for use in all areas Illegal to redistribute ? ? Ongoing releases, but establishment not yet confirmed Released, but failed to establish Status Organism Page Status Organism Page Diffuse knapweed Spotted knapweed 32 Centaurea diffusa 30 Centaurea stoebe Larinus minutus 36 Cyphocleonus achates 34 Sphenoptera jugoslavica 40 Larinus obtusus 38 Cyphocleonus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.Catalogue of the Family Sesiidae in China
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Jin, Q.; Wang, S. X.; Li, H. H. Catalogue of the family Sesiidae in China (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 36, núm. 144, diciembre, 2008, pp. 507-526 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45511220017 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 507-526 Catalogue of the family 10/12/08 10:40 Página 507 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 36 (144), diciembre 2008: 507-526 CODEN: SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267 Catalogue of the family Sesiidae in China (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) Q. Jin, S. X. Wang & H. H. Li Abstract A catalogue of the family Sesiidae in China is provided based partially on the research of the previous literature and partially on the study of the specimens in our collection. A total of 108 species in 26 genera are listed, along with the available information of distribution and host plants. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Sesiidae, catalogue, host plants, distribution, China. Catálogo de la familia Sesiidae en China (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) Resumen Se presenta un catálogo de la familia Sesiidae en China basado parcialmente sobre las revisiones bibliográficas y parcialmente sobre el estudio de los especímenes en nuestra colección. Se da una lista de 108 especies en 26 géneros, así como la información disponible de su distribución y plantas nutricias.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Casmara Subagronoma (Lepidoptera
    insects Article The Biology of Casmara subagronoma (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae), a Stem-Boring Moth of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Myrtaceae): Descriptions of the Previously Unknown Adult Female and Immature Stages, and Its Potential as a Biological Control Candidate Susan A. Wineriter-Wright 1, Melissa C. Smith 1,* , Mark A. Metz 2 , Jeffrey R. Makinson 3 , Bradley T. Brown 3, Matthew F. Purcell 3, Kane L. Barr 4 and Paul D. Pratt 5 1 USDA-ARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA; [email protected] 2 USDA-ARS Systematic Entomology Lab, Beltsville, MD 20013-7012, USA; [email protected] 3 USDA-ARS Australian Biological Control Laboratory, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Dutton Park QLD 4102, Australia; jeff[email protected] (J.R.M.); [email protected] (B.T.B.); [email protected] (M.F.P.) 4 USDA-ARS Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA; [email protected] 5 USDA-ARS, Western Regional Research Center, Invasive Species and Pollinator Health Research Unit, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, CA 94710, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-954-475-6549 Received: 27 August 2020; Accepted: 16 September 2020; Published: 23 September 2020 Simple Summary: Rhodomyrtus tomentosa is a perennial woody shrub throughout Southeast Asia. Due to its prolific flower and fruit production, it was introduced into subtropical areas such as Florida and Hawai’i, where it is now naturalized and invasive. In an effort to find sustainable means to control R. tomentosa, a large-scale survey was mounted for biological control organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • General News
    Biocontrol News and Information 27(4), 63N–79N pestscience.com General News David Greathead hoods. Both broom and tagasaste pods can be a seasonally important food source for kererū (an As this issue went to press we received the sad news endemic pigeon, Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae), par- of the untimely death of Dr David Greathead at the ticularly in regions where its native food plants have age of 74. declined. A previous petition for the release of G. oli- vacea into New Zealand was rejected by the New Besides being a dedicated and popular Director of Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in CABI’s International Institute of Biological Control 1998 on the grounds that there was insufficient (IIBC), David was the driving force behind the estab- information to assess the relative beneficial and lishment and development of Biocontrol News and harmful effects of the proposed introduction. Information. He was an active member of its Edito- rial Board, providing advice and ideas right up to his As part of the submission to ERMA, Landcare death. Research quantified the expected costs and benefits associated with the introduction of additional biolog- We plan that the next issue will carry a full obituary. ical control agents for broom1. Due to uncertainties Please contact us if you would be willing to con- regarding the costs, a risk-averse approach was tribute information: commentary, personal adopted by assuming a worse-case scenario where memories or anecdotes on the contribution that tagasaste was planted to its maximum potential David made. extent in New Zealand (10,000 ha), levels of non- target damage to tagasaste were similar to those on Contact: Matthew Cock & Rebecca Murphy C.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoverfly Newsletter No
    Dipterists Forum Hoverfly Newsletter Number 48 Spring 2010 ISSN 1358-5029 I am grateful to everyone who submitted articles and photographs for this issue in a timely manner. The closing date more or less coincided with the publication of the second volume of the new Swedish hoverfly book. Nigel Jones, who had already submitted his review of volume 1, rapidly provided a further one for the second volume. In order to avoid delay I have kept the reviews separate rather than attempting to merge them. Articles and illustrations (including colour images) for the next newsletter are always welcome. Copy for Hoverfly Newsletter No. 49 (which is expected to be issued with the Autumn 2010 Dipterists Forum Bulletin) should be sent to me: David Iliff Green Willows, Station Road, Woodmancote, Cheltenham, Glos, GL52 9HN, (telephone 01242 674398), email:[email protected], to reach me by 20 May 2010. Please note the earlier than usual date which has been changed to fit in with the new bulletin closing dates. although we have not been able to attain the levels Hoverfly Recording Scheme reached in the 1980s. update December 2009 There have been a few notable changes as some of the old Stuart Ball guard such as Eileen Thorpe and Austin Brackenbury 255 Eastfield Road, Peterborough, PE1 4BH, [email protected] have reduced their activity and a number of newcomers Roger Morris have arrived. For example, there is now much more active 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire, PE9 1QE, recording in Shropshire (Nigel Jones), Northamptonshire [email protected] (John Showers), Worcestershire (Harry Green et al.) and This has been quite a remarkable year for a variety of Bedfordshire (John O’Sullivan).
    [Show full text]
  • The Insect Fauna Associated with Horehound (Marrubium Vulgare L
    Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.15(1) 2000 21 belonging to eight orders were found feeding on the plant (Figure 2, Table 2). The insect fauna associated with horehound The insects included 12 polyphagous spe- (Marrubium vulgare L.) in western Mediterranean cies (44%), 8 oligophagous species (30%) and 7 monophagous species (26%). At the Europe and Morocco: potential for biological control larval stage, there were five root-feeding in Australia species (22%), one stem-boring species (4%), nine leaf-feeding species (39%), eight flower, ovary or seed feeding species A Jean-Louis Sagliocco , Keith Turnbull Research Institute, Victorian (34%). Based on adult feeding behaviour Department of Natural Resources and Environment, CRC for Weed there was one root-boring species (74%), Management Systems, PO Box 48, Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia. six leaf-feeding species (40%) and eight A Previous address: CSIRO European Laboratory, Campus International de species feeding on flowers or ovaries or Baillarguet, 34980 Montferrier sur Lez, Cedex, France. seeds (53%). Wheeleria spilodactylus (Curtis) Summary were preserved. Immature stages were (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae) Marrubium vulgare L. (Lamiaceae) was kept with fresh plant material until the Wheeleria spilodactylus was abundant at surveyed in western Mediterranean Eu- adult stage for identification. Insects most sites in France and Spain, and had rope and Morocco to identify the phy- were observed either in the field or the been recorded feeding on M. vulgare tophagous insect fauna associated with laboratory to confirm that they fed on the (Gielis 1996) and Ballota nigra (Bigot and this weed and to select species having plant. Insects were sent to museum spe- Picard 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Natural History and Control of Nonnative Invasive Species
    Appendix B: Natural History and Control of Nonnative Invasive Plants Found in Ten Northern Rocky Mountains National Parks Introduction The Invasive Plant Management Plan was written for the following ten parks (in this document, parks are referred to by the four letter acronyms in bold): the Bear Paw Battlefield-BEPA (MT, also known as Nez Perce National Historical Park); Big Hole National Battlefield-BIHO (MT); City of Rocks National Reserve-CIRO (ID); Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve-CRMO (ID); Fossil Butte National Monument-FOBU (WY); Golden Spike National Historic Site-GOSP (UT); Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site-GRKO (MT); Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument-HAFO (ID); Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument-LIBI (MT); and Minidoka National Historic Site-MIIN (ID). The following information is contained for each weed species covered in this document (1) Park presence: based on formal surveys or park representatives’ observations (2) Status: whether the plant is listed as noxious in ID, MT, UT, or WY (3) Identifying characteristics: key characteristics to aid identification, and where possible, unique features to help distinguish the weed from look-a-like species (4) Life cycle: annual, winter-annual, biennial, or perennial and season of flowering and fruit set (5) Spread: the most common method of spread and potential for long distance dispersal (6) Seeds per plant and seed longevity (when available) (7) Habitat (8) Control Options: recommendations on the effectiveness of a. Mechanical Control b. Cultural
    [Show full text]
  • Arcola Malloi (Pastrana): Alligatorweed Stem Borer Moth Lepidoptera: Pyralidae Current Rating: Q Proposed Rating: D
    California Pest Rating Proposal Arcola malloi (Pastrana): Alligatorweed stem borer moth Lepidoptera: Pyralidae Current Rating: Q Proposed Rating: D Comment Period: 09/27/2019 through 11/11/2019 Initiating Event: An application was submitted for the purpose of releasing A. malloi in California for the control of alligatorweed. History & Status: Background: Arcola malloi, previously known as Vogtia malloi, is native to South America. It was released as a biological agent to control alligatorweed in the United States in the 1970s and in California in 1976. It is now established in the southeastern United States. The adult moth has a wingspan of approximately 30 mm. The female lays eggs on leaves and newly-hatched larvae tunnel into the stems. (Buckingham, 1996). Pupation occurs inside the plant. Arcola malloi attack aquatic and terrestrial alligatorweed stems, which turn yellow and die, and heavily damaged mats eventually rot and sink (Brown and Spencer, 1973). Field observations of 51 species of plants in the native habitat of A. malloi in Argentina, including seven species of Amaranthaceae (besides A. philoxeroides) and 26 species of Chenopodiaceae, did not reveal feeding damage by A. malloi on any except A. philoxeroides (Maddox and Hennessey, 1970). The host range of A. malloi was studied by Maddox and Hennessey (1970). They tested the ability of this moth to feed on 30 species of plants in six families. Full development was restricted to the tribe Gomphrenae, although there was moderate feeding on other Amaranthaceae and two species of Chenopodiaceae. In South America, A. malloi was reared from Alternanthera hassleriana and possibly Philoxerus portulacoides (Maddox and Hennessey, 1970), and it was found to develop on Blutaparon vermiculare in the southeastern United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Tenth Forum Herbulot 2018. Integrative Taxonomy, a Multidisciplinary Approach to Answer Compli- Cated Taxonomic Questions
    SPIXIANA 42 2 291-320 München, Dezember 2019 ISSN 0341-8391 Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer compli- cated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018) Axel Hausmann & Hossein Rajaei (eds) Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. (eds) 2019. Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018). Spixiana 42 (2): 291- 320. The tenth International Congress of FORUM HERBULOT on “Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions” took place in the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart (SMNS), from 11.- 16.06.2018, with 77 participants and 52 scientific presentations. The proceedings provide short information on the meeting and the abstracts of the oral presenta- tions. Axel Hausmann (corresponding author), SNSB – ZSM, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Short report and results Axel Hausmann & Hossein Rajaei Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. 2019. Short report and results. Pp. 291-292 in: Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. (eds). Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018). Spixiana 42 (2). Axel Hausmann (corresponding author), SNSB – ZSM, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Mu- nich, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] The meeting was organized by an organization The conference started with a lecture on the ground- team of the ‘Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde breaking effects of “Willi Hennig and the synthesis of Stuttgart’ (SMNS).
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO
    Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area August 2015 CNHP’s mission is to preserve the natural diversity of life by contributing the essential scientific foundation that leads to lasting conservation of Colorado's biological wealth. Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 1475 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, CO 80523 (970) 491-7331 Report Prepared for: United States Air Force Academy Department of Natural Resources Recommended Citation: Smith, P., S. S. Panjabi, and J. Handwerk. 2015. Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Front Cover: Documenting weeds at the US Air Force Academy. Photos courtesy of the Colorado Natural Heritage Program © Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area El Paso County, CO Pam Smith, Susan Spackman Panjabi, and Jill Handwerk Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Various federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, orders, and policies require land managers to control noxious weeds. The purpose of this plan is to provide a guide to manage, in the most efficient and effective manner, the noxious weeds on the US Air Force Academy (Academy) and Farish Recreation Area (Farish) over the next 10 years (through 2025), in accordance with their respective integrated natural resources management plans. This plan pertains to the “natural” portions of the Academy and excludes highly developed areas, such as around buildings, recreation fields, and lawns.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Biological Control on Two Knapweed Species in British Columbia
    Impact of Biological Control on Two Knapweed Research Report Species in British Columbia Don Gayton, FORREX & Val Miller, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Abstract Diffuse and spotted knapweed ( Centaurea diffusa Lam and C. stoebe L.) are two closely re - lated invasives found in many parts of British Columbia’s Southern Interior, causing sub - stantial economic losses in rangelands. Beginning in 1970, the provincial government initiated a long-term biological control effort against the knapweeds, introducing 10 dif - ferent insect agents from 1970 to 1987. In an effort to evaluate the efficacy of the program, archival (1983–2008) data was amassed from 19 vegetation monitoring sites that contained knapweed. In 2010, these sites were relocated and re-monitored and cover values were an - alyzed. Diffuse knapweed showed significant declines at 14 of 15 sites; spotted knapweed declined at three of four sites. Possible alternative explanations for the decline are dis - cussed. Evidence strongly points to a suite of biocontrol agents (seed feeders and root feed - ers) as the primary drivers of knapweed decline in British Columbia’s Southern Interior. KEYWORDS : biological control; British Columbia; Centaurea ; knapweed; monitoring Introduction iffuse knapweed ( Centaurea diffusa Lam.) and spotted knapweed ( Centaurea stoebe L.) are two introduced, closely related invasive forbs. These species are most com - Dmon in the northwestern United States and in western Canada. Centaurea stoebe (also referred to as C. maculosa Lam. and C. biebersteinii DC) is particularly widespread, reported in 45 US states and all provinces of Canada (Marshall 2004; Zouhar 2001). The drought-tolerant C. diffusa has an altitudinal range of 150–900 m, whereas C.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2018, 419, 42 Knowledge & © K. Pabis, Published by EDP Sciences 2018 Management of Aquatic https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2018030 Ecosystems www.kmae-journal.org Journal fully supported by Onema REVIEW PAPER What is a moth doing under water? Ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic Lepidoptera Krzysztof Pabis* Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland Abstract – This paper reviews the current knowledge on the ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic moths, and discusses possible pre-adaptations of the moths to the aquatic environment. It also highlights major gaps in our understanding of this group of aquatic insects. Aquatic and semi-aquatic moths represent only a tiny fraction of the total lepidopteran diversity. Only about 0.5% of 165,000 known lepidopterans are aquatic; mostly in the preimaginal stages. Truly aquatic species can be found only among the Crambidae, Cosmopterigidae and Erebidae, while semi-aquatic forms associated with amphibious or marsh plants are known in thirteen other families. These lepidopterans have developed various strategies and adaptations that have allowed them to stay under water or in close proximity to water. Problems of respiratory adaptations, locomotor abilities, influence of predators and parasitoids, as well as feeding preferences are discussed. Nevertheless, the poor knowledge on their biology, life cycles, genomics and phylogenetic relationships preclude the generation of fully comprehensive evolutionary scenarios. Keywords: Lepidoptera / Acentropinae / caterpillars / freshwater / herbivory Résumé – Que fait une mite sous l'eau? Écologie des lépidoptères aquatiques et semi-aquatiques. Cet article passe en revue les connaissances actuelles sur l'écologie des mites aquatiques et semi-aquatiques, et discute des pré-adaptations possibles des mites au milieu aquatique.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Knapweeds
    Biology, Ecology and Management of Montana Knapweeds EB0204 revised August 2017 Celestine Duncan, Consultant, Weed Management Services, Helena, MT Jim Story, Research Professor, retired, MSU Western Ag Research Center, Corvallis, MT Roger Sheley, former MSU Extension Weed Specialist, Bozeman, MT revised by Hilary Parkinson, former MSU Research Associate, and Jane Mangold, MSU Extension Invasive Plant Specialist Table of Contents Plant Biology . 3 SpeedyWeed ID . 5 Ecology . 4 Habitat . 4 Spread and Establishment Potential . 6 Damage Potential . 7 Origins, Current Status and Distribution . 8 Management Alternatives . 8 Prevention . 8 Mechanical Control . .9 Cultural Control . .10 Biological Control . .11 Chemical Control . .14 Integrated Weed Management (IWM) . 16 Additional Resources . 17 Acknowledgements . .19 COVER PHOTOS large - spotted knapweed by Marisa Williams, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, bugwood.org top inset - diffuse knapweed by Cindy Roche, bugwood.org bottom inset - Russain knapweed by Steve Dewey, Utah State University, bugwood.org Any mention of products in this publication does not constitute a recommendation by Montana State University Extension. It is a violation of Federal law to use herbicides in a manner inconsistent with their labeling. Copyright © 2017 MSU Extension The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Montana State University and Montana State University Extension prohibit discrimination in all of their programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital and family status. Issued in furtherance of cooperative extension work in agriculture and home economics, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Jeff Bader, Director of Extension, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717.
    [Show full text]