(2003) Conservationism and Farming in North Queensland, 1861-1970

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(2003) Conservationism and Farming in North Queensland, 1861-1970 This file is part of the following reference: Frazer, Ian (2003) Conservationism and farming in North Queensland, 1861-1970. Masters (Research) thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/78 i CONSERVATIONISM AND FARMING IN NORTH QUEENSLAND, 1861-1970 Thesis submitted by Ian James FRAZER BA ANU, BLitt ANU In December 2003 For the degree of Master of Arts in the School of Humanities James Cook University ii STATEMENT OF ACCESS I, the undersigned, author of this work, understand that James Cook University will make this thesis available for use within the University Library and, via Australian Digital Theses network, for use elsewhere. I understand that, as an unpublished work, a thesis has significant protection under the Copyright Act and I do not wish to place any further restriction on access to this work. Ian Frazer 19 December 2003 iii ELECTRONIC COPY I, the undersigned, author of this work, declare that the electronic copy of this thesis provided to the James Cook University Library is an accurate copy of the print thesis submitted, within the limits of the technology available. Ian Frazer 19 December 2003 iv STATEMENT OF SOURCES DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institution of tertiary education. Information derived from the published or unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references is given. Ian Frazer 19 December 2003 v STATEMENT ON THE CONTRIBUTION OF OTHERS I declare that this thesis is my own work. My supervisor, Dr Russell McGregor, has guided me with suggestions for background reading, with conceptualising my problem and with editing, as stated in the acknowledgements. Beyond that I have worked alone and have received no financial assistance for the project. Ian Frazer 19 December 2003 vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to my supervisor, Dr Russell McGregor, for helping me to make a thesis out of the questions about tensions between farmers and conservationists which I first discussed with him five years ago. He directed me to background reading in environmental history, pushed me to give shape to the statistics and statements which I collected and has persisted, especially in the past six months, in challenging me to lift my mode of expression beyond journalese. Thank you Russell. Thanks, too, to my colleagues in the editorial features department at the Townsville Bulletin for letting me have flexible work hours to enable part-time study. Special thanks to Adella Edwards, cartographer in Tropical Environment Studies at JCU for producing two excellent maps at the very last minute. Many friends have given me encouragement, in particular Janina Mazierska, Peter Bell, Albert Speer and Don Gallagher. My mother, Rose Frazer, has been a constant, long-distance supporter. Thank you all. vii ABSTRACT This is a study of the ideas behind natural resource use in North Queensland. I argue that settlers followed an implicit code which valued caring for, as well as exploiting the land. The earliest settlers took pride in being pioneers who conquered, reshaped and harnessed Nature. Later generations could not claim this status, but found virtue in hard work and practicing a frugal, “tread-lightly” form of stewardship. Legislators promoted the settlement of the coastal strip with morally charged rhetoric: to secure the North for White Australia, to render the wilderness bountiful and produce contented human beings, away from dehumanising cities. North Queensland’s conservation activists of the 1960s advocated a different vision to that of closer-settlement enthusiasts, yet they shared an ideal of a restorative working relationship between human beings and Nature. Naturalists in Cairns and Townsville in the 1930s and 40s had exercised public advocacy for conservation based on a sense of custodianship for native flora and fauna. Activists of the 1960s extended their stewardship to the North’s rain forests and the Great Barrier Reef. The farmers’ stewardship and state’s piecemeal land-management and nature-conservation laws both seem to have assumed a safety net supplied by Nature entwined with Providence. In contrast, the activists viii acted on a belief held by some conservationists since the 1870s, reinforced by evidence of damage since World War II, that Nature was being irreparably damaged and must be rescued. ix TABLE OF CONTENTS List of plates x INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter One Settlement with a sweetener 31 Chapter Two Dairying, cropping, fisheries and the Reef 62 Chapter Three Legal and moral sanctions 78 Chapter Four Attitudes to the land: pioneers and farmers 114 Chapter Five Guardians of nature 149 Conclusions 183 Bibliography 188 x LIST OF PLATES Between pages Plate 1 Map of North Queensland xi Plate 2 Map of Atherton Tableland 61 Plate 3 Trapper’s Permit 85 Plate 4 Masthead, N.Q. Register 121 Plate 5 Orpheus I. advertisement 148 xi North Queensland, Bowen to Cooktown. Source: Geoscience Australia, 1:1000,000 scale vector data. 1 Introduction Nature was an unbreakable, bountiful, capricious and eternal presence with an agency of its own in the dominant discourse about development of North Queensland, from the 1860s to 1960s. It was a multifaceted force to be harnessed, groomed and rendered useful. However, conservationists from Edmund Banfield onwards questioned this view. Their understanding evolved from seeing nature as a fragile, finite resource demanding custodianship to regarding it as the fabric of their own being. Judith Wright argued in 1968 that since “nature” existed only as a human construction, its nurturing or neglect reflected the health of humanity. She saw nature as a life process which humans could help creatively, or destroy. Her case for a “new kind of creative relationship” to rescue nature was based on her understanding, with Samuel Taylor Coleridge, that “in our life alone does Nature live”.1 The quest for harmony between humans and nature was central to the ideals of Queensland’s closer-settlement movement, as well as 1960s environmentalists. Supporters of land settlement schemes, beginning in the 1880s, saw the fostering of an industrious yeomanry, bound to the land, as crucial to nation-building. “We invariably find that an agricultural people are ever the most patriotic, and will suffer the severest privations sooner than sever the link which binds them to the soil,” The Townsville Herald asserted it 1889.2 Judith Wright’s case for stewardship of nature was similar also to the case put by the Apostolic Delegate to Australia, Archbishop P. Bernardini, at the opening of St Teresa’s Agricultural College, Abergowrie, in 1934, for farmers 1 Judith Wright, “Conservation as a Concept”, Quadrant, no.51, volXII, January-February, 1968, quoting from S.T. Coleridge, “Dejection: An Ode” (1802). 2 The Townsville Herald, 26 January, 1889. 2 to see themselves as co-workers with God, “conscious instruments” with Him, “daily renewing the marvellous works of creation”.3 My thesis on the development of North Queensland is that, despite the hopes of closer-settlement and conservation theorists, most settlers eschewed any idealised restorative partnership with “nature”. Farmers and members of naturalists’ groups from the 1870s to 1950s became custodians of constructions such as “the soil”, “the land”, “the farm”, “the bush” and “the wilderness”. Farmers practised stewardship out of self-interest and occasionally for aesthetic or ethical reasons. Nature-lovers exercised an altruistic and utilitarian stewardship for rather randomly chosen tokens of nature, based on their sense of custodianship developed during field studies. Supporters of nature conservation who joined Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland branches in Innisfail and Townsville in 1966 and 1968, respectively, had begun to develop a global view by the early 1970s, driven by the fear that human beings were doing irreparable damage to nature. Their advocacy for the well-being of the whole planet grew more from the sense that human history was unavoidably meshed with nature than from any parochial or partisan cause.4 I began the thesis as an attempt to understand present-day friction between conservationists and farmers in North Queensland. I had heard many farmers assert that they were, in fact, the original conservationists, hence one of my central questions: was this so? I had a theory that farmers were really more careful than their critics asserted, because farming, by definition, implied care and maintenance of the land. Morally charged critiques of farming practices delivered by intrusive non- farmers seemed a likely cause of irritation 3 The North Queensland Register, 28 July, 1934. 4 Libby Robin, Defending the Little Desert, Melbourne, 1998, p.140, traces the concerns of Australian conservationists from anxiety at the loss of habitats in the 1960s to a fear for the future of nature generally in the 1970s. 3 John Howard, then Federal Opposition Leader, asserted in the 1996 election campaign, “We’re all Greenies now”. His colleague the Federal Environment Minister, Senator Robert Hill, made a similar claim in 1997, “everyone is now an environmentalist”, asserting that the concerns of environmental activists in the 1970s had become mainstream concerns 20 years later.5 However, my interviews with post- World War II settlers from the Ingham and Burdekin districts between 1999 and 2002 were complicated by what I felt was a reticence to discuss “conservationism”, apparently because of the word’s holier-than-thou aura. One of the interviews, with a farmer on the outskirts of Ayr, turned into a kind of confession of over-use of pesticides and blanket tree clearing. The conservation activists of the 1960s were opposed more to the clearing of rainforests for farming and grazing ventures than to contentious farming practices.6 Friction between activists and farmers was minimal in the North in this era.
Recommended publications
  • Margaret Klaassen Thesis (PDF 1MB)
    AN EXAMINATION OF HOW THE MILITARY, THE CONSERVATIVE PRESS AND MINISTERIALIST POLITICIANS GENERATED SUPPORT WITHIN QUEENSLAND FOR THE WAR IN SOUTH AFRICA IN 1899 AND 1900 Margaret Jean Klaassen ASDA, ATCL, LTCL, FTCL, BA 1988 Triple Majors: Education, English & History, University of Auckland. The University Prize in Education of Adults awarded by the Council of the University of Auckland, 1985. Submitted in full requirement for the degree of Master of Arts (Research) Division of Research & Commercialisation Queensland University of Technology 2014 Keywords Anglo-Boer War, Boer, Brisbane Courier, Dawson, Dickson, Kitchener, Kruger, Orange Free State, Philp, Queensland, Queenslander, Transvaal, War. ii Abstract This thesis examines the myth that Queensland was the first colonial government to offer troops to support England in the fight against the Boers in the Transvaal and Orange Free State in 1899. The offer was unconstitutional because on 10 July 1899, the Premier made it in response to a request from the Commandant and senior officers of the Queensland Defence Force that ‘in the event of war breaking out in South Africa the Colony of Queensland could send a contingent of troops and a machine gun’. War was not declared until 10 October 1899. Under Westminster government conventions, the Commandant’s request for military intervention in an overseas war should have been discussed by the elected legislators in the House. However, Parliament had gone into recess on 24 June following the Federation debate. During the critical 10-week period, the politicians were in their electorates preparing for the Federation Referendum on 2 September 1899, after which Parliament would resume.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf, 509.06 KB
    Heritage Information Please contact us for more information about this place: [email protected] -OR- phone 07 3403 8888 St Mary's Retreat Key details Also known as The Fort Addresses At 199 Fort Road, Oxley, Queensland 4075 Type of place Residence (group), House Period Victorian 1860-1890 Style Queenslander Lot plan L7_SP172192; L8_SP172192 Date of Information — April 2003 Page 1 Key dates Local Heritage Place Since — 1 January 2004 Date of Information — April 2003 Construction Roof: Corrugated iron; Walls: Timber People/associations Henry William Coxen and family (Occupant) Criterion for listing (A) Historical; (E) Aesthetic; (H) Historical association This house was built in the early 1880s for Henry William Coxen, one of the pioneering graziers in south-east Queensland. He established Jondaryan station on the Darling Downs and was Chairman of the Sherwood Division in 1902. From 1955-1962, this large property of 12.4 hectares was acquired by the Provincial of the Congregation of the Passion in Australasia. It is now used as a retreat centre and home for the Passionist Fathers in Queensland. History In 1865, Henry Coxen purchased 24 acres and 1 rood of riverfront land at Oxley with William Sim for £59 15s. In 1866, Coxen became the sole owner of the land. Coxen added to his property at Oxley in 1870 when he purchased an adjoining 8 acres, and again in 1883 when he purchased another eight acres of riverfront land. Coxen moved with his wife and four children to Oxley in 1880 when he was 57 years old. He probably built this house in the early 1880s, as he was Chairman of the Yeerongpilly Divisional Board (similar to a shire council) in 1887.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Election 2006
    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library RESEARCH BRIEF Information analysis and advice for the Parliament 16 November 2006, no. 3, 2006–07, ISSN 1832-2883 Queensland Election 2006 The Queensland election of September 2006 saw the Beattie Labor Government win a fourth term of office, continuing the longest period of ALP government in the state since 1957. The Coalition parties’ share of the vote puts them within reach of victory, but the way in which they work towards the next election—particularly in the area of policy development—will be crucial to them if they are to succeed. Scott Bennett, Politics and Public Administration Section Stephen Barber, Statistics and Mapping Section Contents Executive summary ................................................... 1 Introduction ........................................................ 2 An election is called .................................................. 2 The Government’s travails............................................ 2 The Coalition ..................................................... 4 Might the Government be defeated? ..................................... 6 Over before it started? ................................................. 6 Party prospects ...................................................... 7 The Coalition parties ................................................ 7 The Government ................................................... 8 Campaigning........................................................ 8 The Government................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Arts Council Strategic Plan, 2001-2003
    ARTS FACILITATION AND CREATIVE COMMUNITY CULTURE: A STUDY OF QUEENSLAND ARTS COUNCIL by Michael John Richards ADVA, MA. Submitted to the Faculty of Creative Industries at Queensland University of Technology, in support of an application for admission to the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, January 2005. 1 LIST OF KEYWORDS Civil Society Community Arts Community Cultural Development Community Revitalisation Community Engagement Creative Class Creative Industries Cultural Industries Cultural Policy Excellence Elite(s) Knowledge Class Meritocracy Regional Arts 2 ABSTRACT This thesis adopts a Cultural Industries framework to examine how Queensland’s arts council network has, through the provision of arts products and services, contributed to the vitality, health and sustainability of Queensland’s regional communities. It charts the history of the network, its configuration and impact since 1961, with particular focus on the years 2001 - 2004, envisages future trends, and provides an analysis of key issues which may be used to guide future policies and programs. Analysis is guided by a Cultural Industries understanding of the arts embedded in everyday life, and views the arts as a range of activities which, by virtue of their aesthetic and symbolic dimensions, enhance human existence through their impact on both the quality and style of human life. Benefits include enhanced leisure and entertainment options, and educational, social, health, personal growth, and economic outcomes, and other indirect benefits which enrich environment and lifestyle. Queensland Arts Council (QAC) and its network of branches has been a dominant factor in the evolution of Queensland’s cultural environment since the middle of the 20th century. Across the state, branches became the public face of the arts, drove cultural agendas, initiated and managed activities, advised governments, wrote cultural policies, lobbied, raised funds and laboured to realise cultural facilities and infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Series
    VOLUME 4 PART 1 MEMOIRS OF THE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM CULTURAL HERITAGE SERIES © Queensland Museum PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia Phone 06 7 3840 7555 Fax 06 7 3846 1226 Email [email protected] Website www.qmuseum.qld.gov.au National Library of Australia card number ISSN 1440-4788 NOTE Papers published in this volume and in all previous volumes of the Memoirs of the Queensland Museum may be reproduced for scientific research, individual study or other educational purposes. Properly acknowledged quotations may be made but queries regarding the republication of any papers should be addressed to the Director. Copies of the journal can be purchased from the Queensland Museum Shop. A Guide to Authors is displayed at the Queensland Museum web site www.qmuseum.qld.gov.au/resources/resourcewelcome.html A Queensland Government Project Typeset at the Queensland Museum DR ERIC MJÖBERG’S 1913 SCIENTIFIC EXPLORATION OF NORTH QUEENSLAND’S RAINFOREST REGION ÅSA FERRIER Ferrier, Å. 2006 11 01: Dr Eric Mjöberg’s 1913 scientific exploration of North Queensland’s rainforest region. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, Cultural Heritage Series 4(1): 1-27. Brisbane. ISSN 1440-4788. This paper is an account of Dr Eric Mjöberg’s travels in the northeast Queensland rainforest region, where he went, what observations he made, and what types of Aboriginal material culture items he collected and returned with to Sweden in 1914. Mjöberg, a Swedish entomologist commissioned by the Swedish government to document rainforest fauna and flora, spent seven months in the tropical rainforest region of far north Queensland in 1913, mainly exploring areas around the Atherton Tablelands.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland National Parks Short Walks
    Short walks guide Queensland’s national parks Short walks in the tropical north Venture naturally Contents Explore national parks ........................................ 3 Wooroonooran National Park, Goldfield Trail ............................................. 16 Choose your walk ................................................4 Wooroonooran National Park, Townsville (map) .................................................6 Goldsborough Valley ................................. 16 Bowling Green Bay National Park, Eubenangee Swamp National Park .........17 Mount Elliot .................................................. 7 Mount Whitfield Conservation Park .......17 Magnetic Island National Park ................. 7 Fitzroy Island National Park ......................18 Townsville Town Common Conservation Park .......................................8 Green Island National Park .......................18 Cape Pallarenda National Park ..................8 Barron Gorge National Park .................... 19 Paluma Range National Park, Daintree National Park, Mount Spec ...................................................9 Mossman Gorge ......................................... 19 Paluma Range National Park, Daintree National Park, Jourama Falls ................................................9 Cape Tribulation .........................................20 Girringun National Park, Tropical North Queensland Wallaman Falls ............................................ 10 (tableland map) ...........................................21 Girringun National Park,
    [Show full text]
  • Abolition of the Upper House Community Engagement – Updated 27 March 2001
    Abolition of the Upper House Community Engagement – Updated 27 March 2001 THE ABOLITION OF THE UPPER HOUSE IN QUEENSLAND INTRODUCTION Unicameral legislatures, or legislatures with only one chamber, are uncommon in democracies. It is usually considered that two chambers are necessary for government, and this is the case for the United Kingdom, Canada (at the Federal level) and the United States (Federally, and for all states except Nebraska.) However, some countries, usually small ones, are unicameral. Israel, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, Sweden, and Greece have only one chamber. All the Canadian Provinces, all the Malaysian States and some of the Indian ones, including Assam, are unicameral. Other single-chambered legislatures in the Commonwealth include New Zealand, Ghana, Cyprus, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda, Malta, Malawi, Zambia, Gambia, Guyana, Singapore, Botswana, Zimbabwe and (Western) Samoa. In Australia, the Federal Government has two chambers, as do the governments of all the states, except Queensland. At its separation from New South Wales in 1859, Queensland had two houses of Parliament, the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council. But in a move unique in Australian history, the Legislative Council abolished itself. EARLY DAYS OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL, 1860-1890 Queensland, separated from New South Wales in 1859, was the only colony to have a Parliament from its inception. When the Parliament of Queensland was first promulgated in 1860, there were two houses of Parliament. The first members of the Upper House, the Legislative Council, were appointed for five years by the Governor of New South Wales, so that Queensland would not be left permanently with nominees from the Governor of another colony.
    [Show full text]
  • Heart Failure Support Services Audit
    Queensland Health Clinical Excellence Queensland Statewide Cardiac Clinical Network Queensland Cardiac Outcomes Registry 2018 Annual Report Heart Failure Support Services Audit Improvement | Transparency | Patient Safety | Clinician Leadership | Innovation Queensland Cardiac Outcomes Registry 2018 Annual Report Published by the State of Queensland (Queensland Health), November 2019 This document is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au © State of Queensland (Queensland Health) 2019 You are free to copy, communicate and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the State of Queensland (Queensland Health). For more information contact: Statewide Cardiac Clinical Network, Queensland Health, GPO Box 48, Brisbane Qld 4001, email [email protected], 15 Butterfield St, Herston Qld 4006, phone 3328 9771 for Statewide Cardiac Clinical Network. An electronic version of this document is available at: clinicalexcellence.qld.gov.au/priority-areas/ clinician-engagement/statewide-clinical-networks/ cardiac Disclaimer: The content presented in this publication is distrib- uted by the Queensland Government as an informa- tion source only. The State of Queensland makes no statements, representations or warranties about the accuracy, completeness or reliability of any information contained in this publication. The State of Queensland disclaims all responsibility and all liability (including without limitation for liability in negligence) for all
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly Hansard 1950
    Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly WEDNESDAY, 18 OCTOBER 1950 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy 726 Questions. [ASSEMBLY.] Questions. WEDNESDAY. 18 OCTOBER, 1950. was the opinion of the State Premiers that whilst the scheme had merit, it was a Commonwealth scheme and, therefore, the Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. J. H. Mann, Bris­ Commonwealth should bear all costs in bane) took the chair at 11 a.m,. connection with its implementation and operation. The Prime Minister thereupon QUESTIONS. stated that the contention of the State Premiers would be considered by the Com­ ERASURES FROM ELECTORAL ROLLS. monwealth Cabinet. The decision of the Commonwealth Government in regard t(} Mr. BROWN (Buranda) asked the this matter is now awaited.'' Premier- '' 1. Has hi& attention been drawn to the fact that representatives of certain organi­ 0VER'J'IME, RAILWAY DEPARTMENT. sations are visiting people in the suburbs Mr. NICKLIN (Landsboroug):l-;-Leader of Brisbane with a view to reporting to the of the Opposition) asked the Mm1ster for electoral authorities that some people should Transport- . be crossed off the roll~ ''What was the total cost of overhme ' '2. Are any of these people employed in the Railway Department for 1946-47, · by the State Electoral Office, and, ff so, 1947-48, and 1948-49, respectively~" how many are employed on such work and in what districts? Hon. J. E. DL"GGAN (Toowoomba) '' 3. Does he know that quite a number replied- ?f people, including old people, are receiv­ '' 1946-7, £428,812 j 1947-8, £460,591; mg notifications intimating that m1 1948-9, £900,719." objection has bPen received against their appearance on the roll and asking them to TOWNSVILLE-GIRU ROAD.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Tabled Papers
    REGISTER OF TABLED PAPERS ALL SIX SESSIONS OF THE EIGHTH PARLIAMENT January 1879 to July 1883 Register of Tabled Papers — First Session — Eighth Parliament Papers received in the recess prior to the First Session Undated 1 Writ for Joshua Peter Bell as a Member for the Electoral District of Northern Downs. 2 Writ for Peter McLean as a Member for the Electoral District of Logan. FIRST SESSION OF THE EIGHTH PARLIAMENT 14 January 1879 3 Commission to administer the Oath or Affirmation of Allegiance to Members. 22 Writ and Oath for George Morris Simpson as the Member for the Electoral District of Dalby. Writ and Oath for William Lambert Forbes as the Member for the Electoral District of Clermont. Writ and Oath for John Scott as a Member for the Electoral District of Leichhardt. Writ and Oath for Francis Tyssen Amhurst as the Member for the Electoral District of Mackay. Writ and Oath for Archibald Archer as the Member for the Electoral District of Blackall. Writ and Oath for William Henry Baynes as the Member for the Electoral District of Burnett. Writ and Oath for Joshua Peter Bell as the Member for the Electoral District of Northern Downs. Writ and Oath for Samual Grimes as the Member for the Electoral District of Oxley. Writ and Oath for John Hamilton as the Member for the Electoral District of Gympie Writ and Oath for John Deane as the Member for the Electoral District of Townsville. Writ and Oath for Charles Lumley Hill as the Member for the Electoral District of Gregory. Writ and Oath for Henry Rogers Beor as the Member for the Electoral District of Bowen.
    [Show full text]
  • SC6.13 Planning Scheme Policy – Places of Significance
    SC6.13 Planning scheme policy – Places of significance SC6.13.1 Purpose of the planning scheme policy (1) The purpose of this planning scheme policy is to provide guidance on preparing a statement of significance, impact assessment report, archaeological management plan, conservation management plan and an archival report. The planning scheme policy also contains the statements of cultural significance for each of the places of local significance which must be considered when assessing development applications of the place. SC6.13.2 Information Council may request SC6.13.2.1 Guidelines for preparing a Statement of significance (1) An appropriately qualified heritage consultant is to prepare the statement of significance. (2) A statement of cultural significance is to be prepared in accordance with the ICOMOS Burra Charter, 1999 and associated guidelines and the Queensland Government publication, using the criteria – a methodology. (3) The statement of cultural significance describes the importance of a place and the values that make it important. (4) A statement of cultural significance is to include the following: (a) Place details including place name, if the place is known by any other alternative; names and details if it listed on any other heritage registers; (b) Location details including the physical address, lot and plan details, coordinates and the specific heritage boundary details; (c) Statement/s of the cultural significance with specific reference to the cultural significance criteria; (d) A description of the thematic history and context of the place demonstrating an understanding of the history, key themes and fabric of the place within the context of its class; (e) A description of the place addressing the architectural description, locational description and the integrity and condition of the place; (f) Images and plans of the place both current and historical if available; (g) Details of the author/s, including qualifications and the date of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Visitation and Use at Barron Falls, Far North Queensland, 2009/2010
    Barron Falls Site Report Sustainable Nature Based Tourism: Planning and Management Report on Visitation and Use at Barron Falls, Far North Queensland, 2009/2010 Julie Carmody and Bruce Prideaux School of Business, James Cook University, Cairns Supported by the Australian Government’s Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility Project 4.9.2 Sustainable Nature Based Tourism: Planning and Management © James Cook University ISBN 978-1-921359-89-7 This report should be cited as: Carmody, J. and Prideaux, B. (2011) Sustainable Nature Based Tourism: Planning and Management. Report on Visitation and Use at Barron Falls, Far North Queensland, 2009/2010. Report to the Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility. Published by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns (57pp.). Published by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre on behalf of the Australian Government’s Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility. The Australian Government’s Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility (MTSRF) supports world-class, public good research. The MTSRF is a major initiative of the Australian Government, designed to ensure that Australia’s environmental challenges are addressed in an innovative, collaborative and sustainable way. The MTSRF investment is managed by the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA), and is supplemented by substantial cash and in-kind investments from research providers and interested third parties. The Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited (RRRC) is contracted by DEWHA to provide program management and communications services for the MTSRF. This publication is copyright. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, information or educational purposes subject to inclusion of a sufficient acknowledgement of the source.
    [Show full text]