Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in , (Agreement No: 720FDA18GR00280)

INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE NIGER

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger

AGREEMENT NO: 720FDA18GR00280

REPORTING PERIOD: AUGUST 1, 2018- MARCH 31, 2019

PRESENTED TO:

THE USAID OFFICE OF FOREIGN DISASTER ASSISTANCE

Collaborating Partner: Agency Headquarters: International Rescue Committee Niger International Rescue Committee c/o Giorgio Faedo, Country Director c/o Amelia Hays, Program Officer Tel: +227 92 18 74 01 Tel : 212.551.0954 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected]

SUBMITTED: MAY 1, 2019

Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger (Agreement No: 720FDA18GR00280)

I. Executive Summary

PROGRAM TITLE: Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger AGREEMENT: 720FDA18GR00280 AGENCY: International Rescue Committee in Niger CAUSE: WASH, protection, food security, shelter and NFI PROJECT PERIOD: 12 months (August 1, 2018 – July 31, 2019) OBJECTIVE: Improve the living conditions and build the resilience of vulnerable households in , through emergency and early recovery interventions in the WASH, protection, food security, shelter, and NFI sectors

BENEFICIARIES: Total number of beneficiaries targeted: 26,280 direct beneficiaries, including 14,580 IDPs Total number of beneficiaries reached to date: 15,359 beneficiaries, including 8,728 IDPs

LOCATION: Region of Diffa, Niger

WASH: Diffa, Maïné Soroa, and departments

Protection: N’Guigmi, Bosso, Diffa, Maïné Soroa, and Goudoumaria departments

Agriculture and Food Security: N’Gourti, Diffa, Maïné Soroa, and Goudoumaria departments

Shelter and Settlements:

1 Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger (Agreement No: 720FDA18GR00280)

I. Introduction

For several years, Niger’s population has been affected by cyclical, structural and chronic problems that require an urgent humanitarian response coupled with strategies aimed at strengthening the resilience of the affected populations. Diffa region in eastern Niger, located along the border with Nigeria, has been affected by non-state armed group (NSAG) activities since 2015 and continues to face attacks by these NSAGs. While the number of attacks decreased in 2017 and early 2018, the end of the year and the beginning of 2019 have seen a sharp increase in violence. Such violence is likely to persist as military operations are conducted in Niger and as NSAGs are looking to maintain presence in the region (including in Chad and Nigeria). According to UNHCR, at least 52 violent events can be directly attributed to Boko Haram in recent months (15 in November, 17 in December and 20 in January). In March 2019, 21 attacks targeting security forces and civilians, including internally displaced persons (IDPs), refugees and local populations, were recorded, displacing nearly 19,000 people throughout Diffa department.

The situation is expected to continue to impact food security, as well as access to basic water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services and shelter solutions, with a significant impact to protection as access to fields will remain constrained. On March 24, N’gagam site was attacked by non-state armed actors, causing mass displacements and forcing the IRC to suspend activities at this site through the end of the reporting period (March 31). The IRC will provide an update in the next report.

Despite these setbacks, the IRC continues to offer emergency protection services in the five departments of implementation and to closely monitor the evolving needs of affected populations. Following population displacements between January and March 2019, the IRC conducted 8 multi-sectoral assessments (MSAs) to identify the most urgent needs of the affected population as well as 6 rapid protection assessments (RPAs) to highlight the protection issues faced by IDPs. According to the results of these assessments, most of the newly displaced people have left their place of origin without any of their belongings while the people in a situation of protracted displacement also have limited possessions and resources. Over 60% of the displaced affected communities were facing poor food consumption and without access to adequate excretal disposal solutions. The rapid response mechanism (RRM) team was mobilized to provide emergency assistance via the distribution of non-food items (NFI) and emergency shelters kits to the displaced households.

II. Summary of Activities

A. Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene

Number of beneficiaries targeted: 17,750 beneficiaries, including 9,900 IDPs Total number of beneficiaries reached: 4,976 beneficiaries, including 2,190 IDPs

Sub-Sector 1: Hygiene Promotion

Community-led sensitization: From August 2018 to March 2019, 100 community relays (all volunteers), and 20 substitutes in case of an absence, were elected respectively by their community and trained on their roles and responsibilities in the communes of Guéskérou, Diffa, Chétimari and Mainé Soroa. With the support of IRC staff, the community sensitized 4,476 people (1,698 women, 1,001 men, 1,066 girls and 711 boys) on ending the practice of open defecation; using, cleaning and maintaining sanitary facilities; hand washing; practicing good hygiene and water practices, including water collection, transport, conservation and consumption, and environmental and menstrual hygiene. The IRC has worked in the villages of Djalori (Guéskérou commune), Ballari (Diffa commune), Biri Boulam, Tcholori, Gonidi, Wogom Koura, Wogom Gana (Chétimari commune), and Mourimadi (Mainé Soroa commune), to help communities reduce the risk of spreading water-related diseases and health problems through an integrated approach in which access to WASH infrastructure and awareness raising are intimately linked. In order to reach the target, the IRC will strengthen awareness raising during the next distribution of NFIs.

Hygiene promotion at schools: Since August 2018, IRC staff and community relays carried out hygiene promotion activities in 15 schools, including 12 schools in the commune of Diffa, two in the urban commune

2 Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger (Agreement No: 720FDA18GR00280) of Mainé Soroa and one in the rural commune of Chétimari. The IRC established a hygiene club consisting of 12 students in each school to sensitize other students on good hygiene practices and share their knowledge at home with their families and neighbors. These school-based actions will help reach 11,723 students, including 7,254 boys and 4,469 girls. Health clubs have no political or religious affiliations and are specifically trained to eradicate communicable diseases in their school and community, which is why the IRC has intervened in schools to build the capacity of students to eradicate communicable diseases. According to the new policy of the State of Niger on school hygiene, parents’ associations (such as the Mother-Educator Associations) and School Management Committees (CGDES) can no longer be members of these clubs; however, they provide support such as training the hygiene club members and acting as mentors.

Additionally, the IRC is in the process of setting up fifteen handwashing stations in each school, each of which could serve an average of 500 students.

Sub-Sector 2: Sanitation

Promotion of household latrine construction and maintenance: In order to promote improved hygiene and sanitation, the IRC is providing subsidies for latrine construction for 500 households (to the benefit of 3,500 individuals) in the form of Sanplat bricks and slabs, as well as sanitation and hygiene kits. Beneficiaries have been identified in the villages of Gonidi, Cholori, Murimadi, Biri Boula, intervention areas that will also be served by the construction of a multi-village water system, and Wogom Koura and Wogom Gana, whose populations already have access to a multi-village drinking water system through complementary funding. The purpose of targeting villages that are or will have access to clean drinking water is to establish an integrated approach to ending the transmission of water-borne diseases. Once the materials are distributed, the IRC will provide technical expertise and informal training on latrine construction, including digging and masonry pits, latrine superstructures and latrine maintenance.

Although this activity has been delayed due to challenges outlined in the last section of this report, household latrine construction will be complete and indicators will be achieved by the end of the project.

Distribution of sanitation kits: 1,500 sanitation kits, comprising a hard brush, plastic and household gloves, bleach, a rake, and a metal bucket have been purchased and will be distributed to the 500 households receiving latrine material subsidies and 1,000 other households benefiting from improved water sources. During distributions, the IRC will also provide demonstrates on how to properly use the kits to help families build and maintain their latrines and keep this environment free of fecal matter.

Monthly sanitation days in the communities: The monthly awareness days did not go as planned because of the relocation of the implementation sites of the mini-AEP multi villages, though community sensitization on WASH topics occur regularly in the communities. 500 people should be reached by each campaign. Campaigns could help educate families about proper use and maintenance of family-built sanitation facilities, and end open defecation. Despite the delay, messages will be leaked efficiently through IRC agents, community relays and Diffa's "Bawondo" theatrical troupe.

Sub-Sector 3: Water Supply

Rehabilitation of three boreholes equipped with hand pumps: Since the beginning of the project, the IRC has rehabilitated two boreholes equipped with a human-powered pump (hand pump), with two more rehabilitations underway. Initially, the IRC targeted only three boreholes that could serve 750 people, or 250 people per well; however, through savings realized during this activity, the IRC will be able to work on a fourth. Due to population movements and the fact that beneficiaries can access and collect water from wells adjacent to their villages, the IRC is keeping the beneficiary count at 750. The majority of the beneficiaries are IDPs, returnees and refugees who live in the Djalori sites / villages (2 boreholes) and Ballari (2 boreholes) in the commune of Guéskérou. Through these actions, the IRC would improve reliable, safe and equitable access to drinking water to meet the survival needs of target populations.

3 Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger (Agreement No: 720FDA18GR00280)

Rehabilitation and connection of one high potential borehole to a water supply network: In collaboration with the WASH working group, the municipal authorities and the decentralized technical services of the state, the Direction Régionale de l’Hydraulique et de l’Assainissementand (DRH/A) and the Direction Départementale de l’Hydraulique et de l’Assainissement (DDHA), the IRC selected the cluster of four villages in the communes of Chétimari and Mainé Soroa that would benefit from an improvement and extension of an underperforming hydraulic structure. The DDHA, with the support of the IRC, carried out a technical feasibility study, including topographic surveys, network load calculations, and socio-economic evaluations. This feasibility study was slightly delayed following the issuance of a new policy from the Nigerien government regarding ministry bank accounts, but the IRC expects to complete the works by the end of the project.

Based on the results of the study, the improved water system will cover the water needs of the four villages but will not reach 10,000 beneficiaries as originally planned; rather, the system will serve 4,637 people in 2019 with a projection of 7,625 people by 2028 ( growth rate of 5.1%). The water pumping system will be powered entirely by solar energy on the basis of monocrystalline photovoltaic installations and will be fitted with an automatic chlorination system at the outlet of the submersible pump (drilling head). The rehabilitation is in process.

Completion of a solar-powered borehole: This activity aims to finalize the work begun under the previous OFDA project (OFDA-G-15-00186) in the village of Kouloumfordou, a town located in the commune of Goudoumaria. The completed borehole will help serve 2,503 people. The IRC is completing a service contract with the company that will carry out the works and expects the borehole to be completed by the end of June 2019. Like the multi-village AEP, the Kouloumfordou mini-AEP will be fully fueled by solar energy on the basis of monocrystalline technology photovoltaic installations and will be fitted with an automatic chlorination system.

Establishment and/or capacity-building of water user committees (WUCs): In order to set up and train WUCs for rehabilitated and improved water points, the IRC organized sensitization sessions at the various sites to remind beneficiary communities of the criteria for electing committee members. Eight committees composed of 55 members will be selected by their respective communities during a village assembly and will be trained in April by the IRC to assume responsibility for pump maintenance, hygiene around water points and conflict management around water point use. Although the IRC is behind schedule for this activity to the delay in water point rehabilitations, WUCs will be established and trained on their roles and responsibilities throughout the months of April and May 2019.

Sub-Sector 4: WASH Non-Food Items

Distribution of vouchers for hygiene and menstrual hygiene-related NFIs: Although the IRC had originally planned to distribute vouchers redeemable for hygiene and menstrual kits, Diffa’s context and the difficulty of finding a local supplier to create reusable pads has led to the IRC’s decision to procure and distribute kits, which include tampons, underwear and sanitary napkins, directly to beneficiaries The kits have been ordered and will be distributed in early April throughout the intervention sites, with priority given to household latrine beneficiaries and vulnerable women. The 1,500 kits will thus benefit 10,500 individuals and can help households improve their hygiene conditions. During these distributions, community mobilizers will conduct sensitization to break the taboo about menstrual hygiene for the well-being and dignity of women and girls.

Distribution of dignity kits for emergency purposes (RRM component): The IRC has ordered 1,000 dignity kits, comprising tampons, sanitary napkins and underwear, to distribute in May 2019. This distribution complements the distribution of emergency NFI kits that will benefit displaced populations, and will reach approximately 7,000 women and girls. Similarly, the IRC will strengthen awareness raising for women and girls to learn how to properly use and safely dispose of materials after use.

B. Protection

Number of beneficiaries targeted: 3,710 beneficiaries, including 2,597 IDPs

4 Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger (Agreement No: 720FDA18GR00280)

Number of beneficiaries reached: 1,135 beneficiaries, including 795 IDPs

Sub-Sector 1: Protection Coordination, Advocacy, and Information

Protection monitoring: Throughout the reporting period, the IRC collected protection monitoring data through the community-based protection structures, specifically through the IRC’s 105 focal points (including 102 men and 3 women) and 13 monitors (all of whom are men) put in place by the project. These contacts monitored and reported protection incidents in Diffa, Mainé Soroa, N’guigmi, Goudoumaria, , , , N’guelbley, and Bosso. Protection incidents are reported to the IRC and then shared with other protection actors in the Protection Working Group and the Child Protection and Gender-based Violence (GBV) Sub-Working Groups. Community structures struggle to formally document incidents in protection monitoring tools due to issues around literacy, and thus incidents are shared with IRC for analysis and uploading in the database. During the reporting period, 478 protection incidents were reported, including:  4 cases of sexual aggression;  87 arbitrary arrests;  91 cases of wounding/beating;  63 kidnappings;  84 cases of extortion of goods;  73 homicides;  4 cases of fires/destruction of homes;  3 cases of forced marriage;  2 cases of family separation;  8 cases of torture/mistreatment;  16 cases of rape;  26 cases of rape/pillaging;  17 other non-specified protection incidents.

Community-based protection: During the reporting period, the IRC trained 149 members (86 men and 63 women) of the 23 community-based protection structures in the sites in Diffa, , N’Guigmi, Village, and Kablewa sites on general protection issues and the identification and referral of cases. The IRC’s Protection team followed up on these trainings with visits to the field to coach members of the committees and reinforce their ability to identify and refer protection cases in their communities and to conduct awareness-raising. The IRC exceeded its target of 100 individuals trained in protection due in part to the high level of interest of the protection committee members. The IRC also provides support to the 23 protection committees in the development and implementation of their community action plans—20 of which are complete as of the end of this reporting period--through training, regular follow-up visits, and meetings to validate and finalize the action plans.

Community sensitization: The IRC carried out sensitizations on key protection issues across the five major project areas, reaching 16,684 persons (7,861 women, 3,893 men, 2,417 boys, and 2,513 girls). The IRC works through its community structures to carry out sensitizations. The themes covered during sensitization included:  Available services  Human rights;  Prevention of fires;  Caring for the elderly in the community;  Risks of radicalization of young people;  The importance of declaring births through the relevant legal offices;  Risks and consequences of early marriage;  Risks of unwanted pregnancy among girls;  Risks associated with having sex in exchange for goods or money;  The importance of not abusing or exploiting children;  The importance of social cohesion amidst current social tensions.

5 Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger (Agreement No: 720FDA18GR00280)

The themes are selected based on the types of risks and difficulties that people living in the communities face regularly. The IRC was able to reach a considerable number of persons through 264 sessions due in part to the dynamic mobilization of the community protection structures who are able to engage large numbers of people to participate.

Sub-Sector 2: Child Protection

Case management: During the reporting period, the IRC offered case management to 18 children, including:  7 unaccompanied or separated children (4 boys and 3 girls);  11 children at risk (8 boys and 3 girls).

The IRC collaborates closely with the Child Protection Working Group, the Regional Direction for Child Protection (DRPE), and other actors to coordinate case management, including putting in place a system for case conferences for children during which the decision to close cases is made, including temporarily closing cases after children have received assistance for several years. As part of case management, the IRC provides non-food items (NFIs) for children and accompanies them to needed services. All newly identified cases received an evaluation within two weeks of registration.

Alternative care: During the reporting period, the IRC conducted regular follow-up visits of 36 children placed in host families. The IRC handled both new cases and ongoing cases during the reporting period. All seven UASC supported by the IRC reside in host families.

Safe Healing and Learning Spaces (SHLS): Prior to the start of the project, 25 SHLS facilitators (17 men and 8 women) benefitted from a training on social and emotional recreational activities. These facilitators subsequently implemented the Social Emotional Learning (SEL) curriculum, which focuses on building the resiliency of children and providing them with positive activities that support brain development, in each of the four SHLSs. The IRC’s protection officers conducted daily monitoring of the SHLS sessions. As of March 24, 2019, activities in the SHLS in N’gagam site were suspended after attacks by non-state armed actors in this area that caused mass displacements. It remains uncertain whether that site will be reopened during the second half of the project, and the IRC will provide an update in the next report; however the facilitator of this site has continued to carry out some of the curriculum activities with children from N’gagam site on Awaridi site, where the population has moved. Meanwhile, the new SHLS planned for Tam site was initiated during the reporting period and the purchase of materials has begun.

Awareness-raising related to child protection: The IRC carried out 264 awareness-raising sessions during the reporting period, reaching 1,684 community members sensitizations on the following themes related to child protection:  Risks of radicalization of young people;  The importance of declaring births through the relevant legal offices;  Risks and consequences of early marriage;  Risks of unwanted pregnancies among girls;  The importance of not abusing or exploiting children;  The importance of social cohesion amidst the current tensions.

Sub-Sector 3: Prevention and Response to Gender-based Violence

Case management and psychosocial support (PSS): The IRC works with community-based women’s groups to enable them to carry out sensitizations on GBV risks and consequences, available services, and the importance of obtaining support in a timely manner. The IRC also provided 119 GBV survivors with referral to medical and justice services, accompanying survivors to file complaints and providing funds needed for transport and medical bills. GBV survivors requiring more specialized PSS have been referred to COOPI, an NGO, to receive treatment from a psychologist. The number of GBV survivors reached thus

6 Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger (Agreement No: 720FDA18GR00280) far exceeds the target, which can be attributed to a slight underestimation in the target and an increase in population movements due to insecurity and violence.

Strengthening of community-based referral pathways: The IRC is the co-lead of the GBV Sub-Working Group in Diffa, alongside UNFPA and the Regional Direction for the Promotion of Women, and coordinates actively with all actors to promote the strengthening of community-based referral pathways. The IRC attended coordination meetings during the project period, contributed to the revision of the standard operating procedure (SOP) under development during the reporting period, and coordinated with UNFPA regarding the distribution post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits throughout the intervention areas.

Risk mitigation and awareness-raising: During the reporting period, the IRC regularly worked with the community-based women’s groups to organize discussions on how to reduce GBV risks in communities. Some of these sessions targeted young girls, addressing themes of early marriage, sexual aggression, rape, and the consequences of GBV. Awareness-raising sessions are planned weekly in women’s safe spaces and within communities. The IRC also organized activities during the 16 Days of Activism in December and on International Women’s Day on March 8, when it brought together women’s groups and put on sketches about GBV and provided material support to the Regional Direction for the Promotion of Women to carry out celebrations. The IRC also reached 20 community leaders (12M, 8F) through trainings on GBV between January and March.

Sub-Sector 4: Psychosocial Support Services

Case management for persons with specific needs (PSN): From August 2018 to March 2019, community protection structures established and trained by the IRC identified and referred 56 cases of PSN (34 men and 22 women) to the IRC. The IRC supported them with case management, critical information, psychosocial support, and material support, including basic food and clothing items, to enable them to avoid negative coping mechanisms.

C. Agriculture and Food Security

Number of beneficiaries targeted: 6,300 beneficiaries, including 2,520 IDPs Number of beneficiaries reached: 6,300 beneficiaries, including 1,750 IDPs

Sub-Sector 1: Improving Agricultural Production/Food Security

E-voucher distributions: In October 2018, the IRC worked with Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MoAL) representatives to identify 100 vulnerable households through the Household Economy Analysis (HEA) approach. In late November 2018, the IRC distributed agricultural inputs e-vouchers worth 40,000 XOF (80 USD) per beneficiary household, including 65 male heads of household and 35 women heads of household, to enable them to redeem seeds and farming tools from mobile vendors. The vouchers were used to purchase seeds for onion, cabbage, tomato and pepper, and farming material including shovels, watering cans, rakes and hoes. On distribution day, beneficiaries were trained on the use of their e- vouchers, and were assisted during the fair by the IRC and the MoAL agents. Two localities, namely Lawan Adjiri in Mainé Soroa commune and Bolomiram in Chétimari commune, were reached by this activity with 50 beneficiaries per locality (100 beneficiary households total).

Also, the IRC supported gardening activities, drilling of boreholes and provision of water pump to promote the use of irrigation among beneficiaries engaging in sustainable crop production and to increase and diversify household income and nutrition. The IRC supported the 100 beneficiary households mentioned above in identifying two communal plots of one hectare for both communities to be developed for irrigation activities. The IRC worked with community leaders and the commune land commission office (COFOCOM), through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), to secure and certify the two sites designated irrigation activities for a 10-year term. This approach allowed beneficiaries to gain access to land to conduct market gardening activities and diversify their livelihood activities. With the consent of the land owners who lend this land, the two plots were fenced to protect crops from nomadic livestock. Four boreholes were drilled and four water pumps were installed to facilitate irrigation and a proper water distribution system.

7 Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger (Agreement No: 720FDA18GR00280)

Agricultural trainings: The IRC facilitated a training for the 100 agricultural input e-voucher beneficiaries in late November/early December on improved market gardening production practices such as seedling production, land preparation, composting, crop watering, and bio-pesticide production and application. An MoAL representative conducted the training and provided monthly monitoring to guide beneficiaries through onsite demonstrations.

Sub-Sector 2: Livestock

Fodder distributions: In order to mitigate the shock of the 2017 fodder production deficit on pastoralist livelihoods, the IRC conducted two voucher distributions, redeemable for livestock fodder, to 800 agro- pastoralist households in Chetimari, Diffa, and Gueskerou communes. Households were selected through the HEA approach and in conjunction with the MoAL in October 2018. For each distribution, every beneficiary received two paper vouchers from the IRC, worth 21,000 XOF (53 USD) total in local currency to purchase a 50 kilogram bag of wheat bran and a 50 kilogram bag of cottonseed cake from IRC-contracted vendors. A third distribution will be conducted in April 2019.

The IRC worked with both the commune authorities and the Livestock Department of the MoAL to implement project activities starting from the identification of villages, beneficiaries, and fodder distribution to ensure synergy with other partners’ intervention and prevent duplication. The technical staff of the Livestock Department of the MoAL conducted monthly field monitoring to provide continuous technical guidance on livestock management, feeding and health care for animals. These representatives have reported that the fodder distributions have improved animal productivity in both reproductive capacity and size. The beneficiaries per distribution site/village are summarized in the table below.

Table: Fodder voucher beneficiaries per site

Commune Village/site Men Women Total

Adamdi 27 42 69 Mainé Lawandi 53 63 116 Dalla_Wako 29 35 64 Chétimari Issari 43 57 100 Diffa Ligaridi 54 21 75 Gueskérou Waragou 51 24 75 Arianga 14 50 64 Blatay 18 45 63 N’Gourti N’Guel Kompo 18 30 48 Oureré Ouest 30 35 65 Kirfé 15 46 61 Total 352 448 800

Livestock distributions: The IRC distributed goats as additional assistance to 50 very poor households among the 800 who received animal fodder to strengthen and diversify their livelihoods after losing their animals and other resources as a result of insecurity and conflict. Each selected household received three female goats and one male goat to rebuild their herd. Similar to the fodder distribution, each of these 50 households received a paper voucher worth 82,500 XOF (130 USD) redeemable for four goats. To ensure that beneficiaries received healthy and productive goats, prior to the distribution, the IRC and MoAL representatives ensured that goats had been de-wormed, vaccinated, and quarantined for a week at the distribution site. After the distribution, IRC field staff and MoAL staff conducted joint monitoring to provide

8 Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger (Agreement No: 720FDA18GR00280) technical guidance to the beneficiaries. From the monitoring report, the number of the goats has started to increase and beneficiaries are enjoying milk and cheese from the goats. With the increase in number, beneficiaries increase food diversification and generate income through the selling of animal products, whether milk, cheese or the goats themselves. Including livestock distributed to beneficiaries and those benefitting from fodder distributions, approximately 2,050 livestock have been affected by the IRC’s activities.

Technical trainings: IRC staff have been carrying out demonstrations on the rational use of livestock fodders, livestock nutrition and health management, including hygienic conditions, and the availability of community animal health workers (CAHWs). A formal technical training for fodder and small ruminant beneficiaries is planned for May or June 2019.

Sub-Sector 3: Veterinary Pharmaceuticals and other Medical Commodities (VPMC)

Support to veterinary care: The IRC, in collaboration with the private veterinary service provider (Services Vétérinaires Privés de Proximité or SVPP) at the regional level of Diffa, and the Livestock Department of the MoAL, identified and trained five CAHWs or para-veterinarians in Mainé Soroa, Diffa and N'Gourti department in February 2019. The aim of this activity is to improve the availability of veterinary services and access to these services by those with livestock, addressing a significant gap in the region. At the end of the training, the IRC provided each CAHW with a kit comprising the most used veterinary products and materials to enable them to start working immediately. CAHWs have thus far treated 332 animals in the intervention sites. The IRC facilitated monthly field monitoring by MoAL and SVPP representatives to provide CAHWs with on-site technical guidance. Before the end of the project, the IRC will work with the MoAL to formally certify or recognize these trained CAHWs so that they may continue to work after the end of the project and continue to access SVPP services and materials, including training, mentoring, and veterinary drugs. This will also allow the SVPP to extend their services within Diffa and reach a greater number of livestock and households.

Table: CAHWs trained and set up with OFDA funding in 2019 Department Commune Village/Site Number of CAHWs Mainé Soroa Mainé Soroa Lawandi 1 Diffa Gueskérou Waragou 1 Oureré Ouest 1 N’Gourti N’Gourti Blatay 1 Bigiranga 1 Total 3 communes 5 sites 5

Sub-Sector 4: Pests and Pesticides

As mentioned above, the IRC and the MoAL conducted a training for the 100 agro-input voucher beneficiaries from late November to early December. In addition to its focus on the use of agricultural inputs and market gardening, this training aimed to improve beneficiaries’ knowledge on and capacity to manage pests. This training was conducted on each gardening site by the MoAL’s phytosanitary agents from the Diffa regional level. The training emphasized pest management through best practices such as pest habitat destruction, modification of cultural practices, and the use of pest-resistant crops, and the production of and application of biological pesticides, such as the extract of neem tree seeds (scientific name: Azadirachta indica). After the training, IRC staff and the MoAL representatives conduct field monitoring to provide proximate support for the application of the acquired competences by the gardeners.

D. Shelter and Settlements

Number of beneficiaries targeted: 10,150 beneficiaries, including 8,120 IDPs

9 Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger (Agreement No: 720FDA18GR00280)

Number of beneficiaries reached: 4,788 beneficiaries, including 4,788 IDPs

Sub-Sector 1: Shelter

Distribution of emergency shelter kits (RRM component): Following a population displacement triggered by NSAG attacks in late 2018 and early 2019, the RRM team was deployed to first assess the needs of the affected communities. Eight MSAs were completed in Gorodi, Kindjandi, Kindjandi Barwa, Garin Wanzam (Gueskerou commune) – Diffa festival, Adjimeri, Awaradi/Quartier Chateau (Diffa commune) and in Boudouri (Chetimari commune) from January to March 2019. The results were shared with humanitarian partners through OCHA. The MSAs highlighted critical needs in terms of access to shelters. In February and March 2019, therefore, the IRC distributed emergency shelter kits, comprising wood, rope, tarpaulin and vegetal braided mats to 973 households, reaching 4,788 individuals (1,033W, 720M, 1,474G and 1,561B). This distribution is as follows:

Commune Site Number of households Chetimari Damaram 65 Adjimeri and Sabon Carre 170 Diffa Awaridi 344 Ngabaali 92 Gueskerou Garin Wanzam Yebi 128 Kindjandi 174

Prior to the distribution, the IRC established a beneficiary selection and feedback committee in each site. The committees worked with beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries to explain the selection criteria and project goals when complaints arise, and ensured that the emergency kits were complete for each household.

Sub-Sector 2: S&S Non-Food Items

Distribution of essential NFI kits: The IRC also distributed NFI kits as a result of the aforementioned MSAs. Prior to each distribution, beneficiaries were identified with the involvement of the beneficiary selection committees. Vulnerability criteria were discussed with the communities and their leaders to ensure a common understanding of the selection process. The criteria used were based on the Shelter/NFI approach which calculates an NFI score1 for each household and assesses each household’s socio- economic vulnerability. To establish the score, the IRC’s field team and beneficiary selection committee members conducted door-to-door visits to collect information regarding the availability of essential items that are included in the NFI kit. Consequently, the IRC identified and distributed “minimum kits” with essential NFIs, including long-lasting insecticide nets (LLINs) and kitchen kits to 564 displaced households, reaching 2,555 individuals (576W, 350M, 792G and 837B).

Commune Site Number of households Chetimari Damaram 65 Adjimeri and Sabon Carre 173 Diffa Awaridi 32 Garin Wanzam Yebi 128 Gueskerou Kindjandi 166

III. Indicator Tracking Please see attached indicator tracking table (Annex 1).

IV. Challenges and Lessons Learned From August 2018 to March 2019, the IRC encountered the following difficulties in the implementation of activities:

1 The NFI score is calculated based on the recommendations of the NFI Cluster in Niger. It enables to measure whether households own seven essential items (e.g. cooking pot, bedsheets, sleeping mat, outfit for children, jerry can, and mosquito net).

10 Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger (Agreement No: 720FDA18GR00280)

Security: The IRC continues to experience constraints related to security, which has resulted in temporary and occasional suspension of activities in the intervention areas. The IRC maintains safety and security staff who closely follow the situation, liaise with the authorities, and provide advice to staff on a daily basis prior to field visits. The IRC is also working to strengthen contacts with local authorities to ensure that they can provide the IRC with updates on field activities, such as child protection activities and water point rehabilitations, when IRC staff is not able to access the implementation areas.

Clinical care of GBV: While the IRC has carried out a number of trainings on the clinical management of rape (CMR) and UNFPA has distributed PEP kits to facilities, many GBV survivors in Diffa still struggle to access quality clinical care within 72 hours of experiencing sexual assault. Not only are there too few health facilities, meaning they are difficult to access, but there is also significant turnover of health workers, meaning health workers may be assigned to other posts within months of receiving CMR training. Therefore, the capacity of facilities to provide quality clinical remains constrained. On top of this, cultural barriers to reporting GBV cases remain. The IRC continues to follow up with health centers and provide monitoring to ensure the quality care is being practiced.

Resource limitations: First, hydraulic equipment and materials to carry out borehole and water point rehabilitations, including quality solar panels, reservoirs/tanks, and solar submersible pumps, are not readily available on the local market in Diffa. This has partly contributed to the delay in WASH activities and the IRC is working to procure these materials elsewhere. Second, the IRC has learned from monitoring of market gardening activities that beneficiaries are very interested in irrigation practices. They are currently not able to implement irrigation as they are limited by lack of access to water. This is the reason for which the IRC has proposed additional water points, including ones for livestock, for future OFDA programming in its proposal for 2019 funding.

Institutional: As communicated with OFDA in November 2018, a number of challenges under the previous OFDA-funded project (OFDA-G-15-00126) led to failure to complete a borehole, which was subsequently added to the current OFDA project via a modification. However, the IRC has continued to experience delays in finalizing a contract with a construction company. The IRC expects that the work will be completed by the end of the project barring any further security issues and population movements, which could affect rehabilitations and water point sustainability. The IRC is coordinating and continuously communicating with local authorities to anticipate and adapt to changing circumstances. The IRC has also taken steps to ensure that communication about project delays are shared with the donor in a timely manner, including regular monitoring and follow-up of project activities by the WASH Coordinator with field staff, and compliance training with IRC staff.

11 Organization The International Rescue Committee in Niger Program Title Multi-sectoral support to vulnerable households in Diffa, Niger Location Diffa Region, Niger Budget $ 3,236,425.00 Period of Performance

Sector Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Sub-Sector Hygiene Promotion Indicator OFDA or Custom Indicator definition Baseline value Target Data Collection Method Data Collection Source Data Collection Position Responsible for Collection Methododology of baseline Data source of baseline Location and timing of baseline Limitations Analysis Observations Frequency Number of people receiving direct hygiene promotion OFDA People: Direct recipients of hygiene promotion 0 17,750 Records of households visited and records of Primary data collected through Daily or weekly At the beginning of the project, a meeting where N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator measures progress as of (excluding mass media campaigns and without double- who have received hygiene messaging participants at group hygiene sessions. Data related to registration and records of all aspects of the project (including the monitoring implementation and thus is not being measured at counting) personally through a household visit or through this indicator will be completed throughout the project participants directly receiving messages plan of the project) are presented to the various baseline. participating in a group session through disintegrated counting of the beneficiaries through hygiene promotion programs teams involved will be held. Data will be collected implemented with USAID/OFDA funding. People who participated in awareness sessions on good (Primary data will be collected on a daily by community mobilizers and validated by their who participated in group sessions practices of hygiene, home visits, focus groups and basis with sheets of records of participants team leader. They will be provided to the database and also received household visits should not be individual interviews. in different awareness sessions (home officer for quality control, entry and counted twice. People who received visits, group discussions and individual processing/analysis. multiple household visits should also only be interviews) via the mobilizing community counted once. hygiene. In general, sheets highlight developed themes and the number of participants in these different sessions by location).

Percent of households targeted by the hygiene promotion OFDA This indicator measures the existence of safe 44% 70% (1,775 out The existence of safe water storage practices is Records from statistically valid household Beginning and end of Before the KAP survey, the enumerators will be Direct observation of water storage containers in Trained enumerators interviewed a representative November 7 - 13, 2018 in 4 villages: Koublé There are in total 5 villages that will be covered by The baseline results will not change the target, The sample surveyed in the 4 villages is program who store their drinking water safely in clean household water storage practices that of 2,536) measured by direct observation during a quantitative, surveys. The results of the knowledge, project identified and trained on the use of the collection the household. sample of 275 WASH (5% margin of error and 95% Ngourtouwa, Tcholori, Gonidi and Biriboula. WASH activities, one village was inaccessible due which the IRC expects to reach the end of projet. representative for the populations of the 5 villages containers reduce the risks of post-collection water representative, population-based (household) survey. attitudes and practices (KAP) surveys will tool. The surveys will be conducted by external confidence level) beneficiary population. to the high level of the Komadugu River caused by concerned by WASH activities. contamination. The storage of containers clean Using the indicator definition, direct observation will help to quantify the situation at the agents (surveyors) and supervised by M & E officers. the rainfall and therefore is not reflected in the and safe drinking water means water storage in a determine whether the container is both (a) safe – beginning and end of the project. M & E officers will ensure the quality, export, survey. clean , covered container. meaning it is of a type that limits the risk of processing/analysis of data. further contamination (e.g., sealed/covered container with a spigot or narrow-necked jerry can); and (b) clean.

Percent of people targeted by the hygiene promotion OFDA This indicator measures individuals’ knowledge of 69% 75% (13,313 out Knowledge of the critical times to wash hands is Records from statistically valid household Beginning and end of Before the KAP survey, the enumerators will be A KAP survey/household questionnaire; interview program who know at least three (3) of the five (5) critical the hand washing practices which are most of 17,750) measured through a quantitative, epresentative, surveys are project identified and trained on the use of the collection head of household times to wash hands effective at preventing the spread of pathogens population-based (household) survey. Questions preferred. Other reliable population- tool. The surveys will be conducted by external along the fecal-oral cycle. The five critical times to exploring handwashing knowledge must be open- based survey methods (e.g., people at agents (surveyors) and supervised by M & E officers. wash hands are defined as ended, e.g., “Please state for me all of the occasions water M & E officers will ensure the quality, export, 1. After defecation/using the toilet; when it is most important to wash one’s hands.” points) may be used when household processing/analysis of data. 2. Before eating; surveys are not possible. The results of the 3. After changing diapers or cleaning a child’s KAP surveys will help to quantify the bottom; situation at the beginning and end of the 4. Before preparing food; and project. CommCare/Kobo tools will be 5. Before feeding an infant. used to collect and analyze digital data.

Percent of households targeted by the hygiene promotion OFDA This indicator measures the effectiveness of 0 50% (1,268 out The presence of feces in the living area is measured by Records from statistically valid household Beginning and end of Before the KAP survey, the enumerators will be N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator was not measured at baseline. program with no evidence of feces in the living area hygiene promotion efforts to reduce the of 2,536) direct observation during a quantitative, surveys are project identified and trained on the use of the collection practice of open defecation in immediate living representative, population-based preferred. Other reliable population- tool. The surveys will be conducted by external areas. Investigators should observe around the (household) survey. based survey methods (e.g., people at agents (surveyors) and supervised by M & E officers. household if the immediate environment is water M & E officers will ensure the quality, export, without feces. points) may be used when household processing/analysis of data. surveys are not possible. The results of the KAP surveys will help to quantify the situation at the beginning and end of the project. CommCare/Kobo tools will be used to collect and analyze digital data.

Sub-Sector Sanitation Number of people directly utilizing improved sanitation OFDA People: Individuals counted as benefiting from a 0 3500 Two measurements are required for this indicator: Household surveys to determine Beginning and end of Technicians are required to provide reports of the N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator was not measured at baseline. services provided with OFDA funding sanitation program are those who are targeted by 1. Utilization of sanitation facilities should be utilization or direct observation of either project work to the M & E Officers, who will ensure and the program and who regularly utilize sanitation documented either through an observed usage of latrines or a reduction in open control for data quality, export, and constructed, rehabilitated, decrease in open defecation, observed usage of defecation; population data sources as processing/analysis. or maintained either directly by the project, or latrines, or household survey data of self-reported well as activity reports will also be constructed by beneficiaries themselves behaviors. utilized. as a result of program activities to create a 2. The population benefiting from the sanitation communal demand for sanitation. program must be estimated. A variety of methods are acceptable to estimate the number of individuals served by the sanitation program. A full counting of direct beneficiaries, where possible, is likely the most accurate means. This may not be possible in all cases. If a full counting is not possible, a household (HH) survey may be necessary in order to calculate average HH size. This can then be multiplied by the number of HHs served to obtain an estimate of the number of beneficiaries. The official camp/shelter population data may also be used. Alternatively, a key informant interview with a community leader or local authority who has recently conducted population survey, or data from a recent census from national records may be used, either to calculate average HH size and/or the number of HHs served. Detail what sources or processes were used to estimate the number of beneficiaries and/or the number of households.

Percent of households targeted by latrine OFDA This indicator measures the program’s 0 75% (375 out of The enumeration of households whose latrines are If a census of targeted households is At the end of With regard to surveys, investigators will be N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator was not measured at baseline. construction/promotion program whose latrines are effectiveness in facilitating the construction of 500) completed and clean (the numerator) is measured by conducted, the data source for the construction identified and trained on the use of the collection completed and clean household latrines in order to prevent human direct observation during a census of all households numerator will be observation records tool. Surveys will be conducted with external excreta from being a source of contamination. targeted by the program. The denominator will be from household visits. For the agents(surveyors) and supervised by the M & E Facilitation can range from direct construction by enumerated from project records. denominator, the data source will simply officers. The M & E officers will ensure the your organization (100% subsidy) to promotion of be an enumeration of the targeted quality/control, export, processing/analysis of data. household latrines with no subsidy. households.

If a representative, household survey is conducted, then the data source will be records from statistically valid household surveys.

Percent of latrines/defecation sites in the target OFDA This indicator measures the prevalence of 0 60% (300 out of For household latrines, this indicator should be For handwashing facilities at household At the end of With regard to surveys, investigators will be N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator was not measured at baseline. population with handwashing facilities that are functional handwashing facilities at latrines and defecation 500) measured by direct observation during a quantitative, latrines, records construction identified and trained on the use of the collection and in use sites. The indicator will be disaggregated by representative, population-based from statistically valid household surveys. tool. Surveys will be conducted with external household latrines/defecation sites and public (household) survey. If the household latrine complies For handwashing facilities at public agents(surveyors) and supervised by the M & E latrines/defecations sites. with the definition above, the latrines/defecation sites, records from a officers. The M & E officers will ensure the enumerator should observe the latrine to assess census of all public latrines. quality/control, export, processing/analysis of data. whether it has a handwashing facility that is functional and in use Sub-Sector Water Supply Number of people directly utilizing improved water OFDA The indicator will be measured based on the 0 10,750 Measurement of the indicator will be done through Satisfaction surveys , survey reponses, At the end of Before the KAP survey, the enumerators will be N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator was not measured at baseline. services provided with OFDA funding number of direct beneficiaries reached by the surveys of visits and satisfaction at the level of the activity reports and sign-in sheets construction identified and trained on the use of the collection family. She will take into account of standards water point in the end of the project. It can be also tool. The surveys will be conducted by external relating to the use of latrines in households. done on the basis of the ratio of the number of the agents (surveyors) and supervised by M & E officers. facilities realized. M & E officers will ensure the quality, export, processing/analysis of data.

Percent of households targeted by WASH program that OFDA This indicator measures the proportion of the 76% 80% (1,229 out The practice of collecting all water for drinking, KAP and PIM surveys. Beginning and end of Before the KAP survey, the enumerators will be KAP survey using household questionnaire; head of Trained enumerators interviewed a representative November 7 - 13, 2018 in 4 villages: Koublé There are in total 5 villages that will be covered by The baseline results will not have an impact on our The sample surveyed in the 4 villages is are collecting all water for drinking, cooking, and hygiene population that is collecting water for drinking, of 1,536 cooking and hygiene from improved sources is project identified and trained on the use of the collection household interview sample of 275 WASH (5% margin of error and 95% Ngourtouwa, Tcholori, Gonidi and Biriboula. WASH activities, one village was inaccessible due planned program. representative for the populations of the 5 villages from improved water sources cooking, and hygiene solely from improved water households) measured through interviews during a quantitative, tool. The surveys will be conducted by external confidence level) beneficiary population. to the high level of the Komadugu River caused by concerned by WASH activities. sources. representative, population-based (household) survey. agents (surveyors) and supervised by M & E officers. the rainfall and therefore is not reflected in the M & E officers will ensure the quality, export, survey. processing/analysis of data.

Percent of water points developed, repaired, or OFDA This indicator measures the microbiological water 0 100% (8 out of This indicator will be measured by a census of all water Records of microbiological water quality Before and after the Bacteriological analyses will be conducted by the N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator was not measured at baseline. rehabilitated with 0 fecal coliforms per 100 ml sample quality directly at the water point (i.e. the point of 8) points developed, repaired, or rehabilitated by the results from water samples collected rehabilitation of each regional laboratory of the DRHA. Senior WASH distribution). program. Program staff and technicians must be during a census of all water points water point officer will be responsible for monitoring of water trained and proficient in collecting, transporting, and developed, repaired, or rehabilitated by quality analysis. processing water samples. the program. Partners will indicate the water quality analysis method used when reporting. (Acceptance of work documents and result records of water analyses will be reviewed).

Percent of households whose drinking water supplies have OFDA This indicator measures the effectiveness of efforts 0 70% (1,000 out This indicator will be measured via household-level Records of FRC testing results from water Start and end of project The M & E officers will be responsible for N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator was not measured at baseline. a free residual chlorine (FRC) > 0.2 mg/L to disinfect public water supplies and maintain of 1,429) water quality testing during a quantitative, samples collected during statistically valid conducting surveys; community mobilizers will take adequate levels of free residual chlorine (FRC) all representative, household survey. A post-distribution household surveys. responsibility for follow-ups after the training with the way down to the point of consumption at the monitoring (PDM) survey will be organized a month using the checklists. household. after, to measure the level of satisfaction of beneficiaries, to control the quality but also the appropriate utilization of distributed items. CVs will be equipped with pool testers to measure free residual chlorine in the water of a sample of households benefitting from the kits, and make sure that free residual chlorine level are above 0.2 mg/L. Their findings will be collected during PDM.

Percent of water user committees created and/or trained OFDA This indicator provides a measure of the program’s 0 75% (6 out of 8) For the numerator, records from focus group KAP surveys, post-training checklist and End of the training The M & E officers will be responsible for N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator can only be measured three months by the WASH program that are active at least three (3) effectiveness in establishing functional water user discussions (FGDs) with water user committees and program reports. sessions conducting surveys; community mobilizers will take after water committees are established and months after training committees. Water committees members will be records from FGDs with groups of community water responsibility for follow-ups after the training with trained. trained, equipped and active after three months. users. For the denominator, project records. This using the checklists. indicator will be assessed no earlier than three (3) months after the committees have been trained. Data on the progress of this indicator will be collected on the basis of KAP surveys and/or follow-up post training data.

Sub-Sector WASH Non-Food Items Total number of people receiving WASH NFIs assistance OFDA This indicator measures the number of people in 0 10,500 (1,500 Data for this indicator will be collected on the basis of Distribution lists, program reports End of each distribution Distribution and M&E officers will be responsible of N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once through all modalities (without double-counting) households that are likely to benefit from the households) the total number of recipients in households served. It data collection implementation begins. WASH NFIs through the voucher modality. The will be based on the size of each beneficiary household. calculation will be based on the size of 7 people per household.

Percent of households reporting satisfaction with the OFDA This indicator assesses beneficiary households’ 0 75% (1,125 out This indicator is measured through a post-distribution Records from PDM and KAP surveys. End of each distribution The M & E officers will have overall responsibility N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once kits are contents of the WASH NFIs received through direct satisfaction with the contents of WASH NFIs (non- 1,500 monitoring (PDM) survey. The for/oversight of PDM/KAP surveys. External distributed. distribution (i.e. kits) or vouchers food items) received. households) survey can be quantitative (e.g. a household survey surveyors will be recruited and trained to conduct that is probability based and representative) or PDM surveys with the support of the M & E officers. qualitative (e.g. focus group discussions). In either case, the sampling frame is limited to those households receiving WASH NFIs either through direct distribution or vouchers.

Percent of households reporting satisfaction with the OFDA This indicator assesses beneficiary households’ 0 75% (1,125 out This indicator is measured through a post-distribution Records from surveys End of each distribution The M & E officers will have overall responsibility N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator was not measured at baseline. quality of WASH NFIs received through direct distribution satisfaction with the quality of WASH 1,500 monitoring (PDM) survey. The for/oversight of PIM/KAP surveys. External (i.e. kits), vouchers, or cash NFIs received. households) survey can be quantitative (e.g. a household survey surveyors will be recruited and trained to conduct that is probability based and the PIM with the support of the M & E officers. representative) or qualitative (e.g. focus group discussions). In either case, the sampling frame is limited to those households receiving WASH NFIs either thru direct distribution or vouchers, or cash.

Total USD value of vouchers redeemed by beneficiaries OFDA Voucher: A paper, token, or electronic instrument 0 $138,000 Data for this indicator will be collected on the basis of Distribution lists, program reports, supply End of each distribution Distribution and M&E officers will be responsible N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once activities that can be exchanged for a set quantity or value the total number of recipients in households served. It chain records for data collection. begin. of goods at participating vendors. will be based on the size of each beneficiary household. Value vouchers have a designated monetary value The numebr of people served will then be multiplied by that can be exchanged for an array of the value of the voucher commodities or services up to that amount.

Sector Protection Sub-Sector Protection Coordination, Advocacy, and Information Number of individuals trained in protection OFDA 0 100 (60 men; 40 Aggregate data from the various data sources related Program monitoring records, training Monthly Protection officers N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once activities women) to protection information attendance sheets, trainings database begin.

Total number of people trained according to standard protection guides for humanitarian agencies or other recognized protocol, who are responsible for addressing protection issues over the period of the program. Protection coordination activities can include:

• Protection information gathering and dissemination, • Assistance in the development of referral systems, • Advocating to government officials, • Organizing sensitization campaigns, • Training humanitarian workers, and • Tracking/mapping protection initiatives.

Number and percentage of communities in the project Custom The indicator measures number and % of 5 (22%) 23 out of 23 This indicator will be measured through the use of Project records, tracking database The indicator will be Protection officers This was included in the proposal and has been N/A N/A N/A N/A Baseline data is obtained from previous project that have prepared and implemented Community Safety communities that develop community-safety (100%) project records. The IRC will create a spreadsheet tool measured at the end of collected from previous or current projects in the records under OFDA-G-15-00186. Action Plans action plans during the project period and as a to track project progress (safety action plans being the project period. intervention area. result of the project intervention/their developed). Each time a community develops a plan, participation in the project. the spreadsheet is filled in by the IRC team (or Community-Safety Action plan: This refers to partner). collective plans that have been made by the community, through representative community committees (like protection committees, women’s groups, youth peer educators, etc.) to enhance their individual and collective safety, including reducing their vulnerability to harm and mobilizing appropriate responses to recover when they experience harm. Numerator: Number of communities that have developed community-safety action plans during the project period Denominator: Number communities that have participated in the project

Sub-Sector Child Protection Number of dollars allocated for child protection OFDA This indicator should provide details on the specific 0 $ 135,605 Aggregate data from program data sources such as Program records, finance reports Quarterly Child Protection Manager N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once programming amount of funding allocated to the child BVA/finance report implementation begins. protection sub-sector intervention. This is a required indicator but is recognized by USAID/OFDA as one that will not monitor programmatic activities.

Number of individuals participating in child protection OFDA Child protection services: The full range of 461 1298 Interview with children and caregivers as well as Child protection database; follow-up Monthly Child Protection Officers; Safe Healing and Learning N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Baseline data is obtained from previous project services individual and community-based child protection observation; compilation of training attendance sheets sheets of unaccompanied and separated Spaces (SHLS) animators/SEL facilitators; Child records under OFDA-G-15-00186. services designed to reduce and minimize the risk children (UASC); social emotional learning Protection Manager that children and adolescents have to exploitation (SEL) training attendance sheets; list of and abuse during an emergency. On this project, protection committee members; program activities will include: records. • Child protection case management including psychosocial support, • Alternative and foster care, • Safe spaces for children to play and learn • The support to protection committees (including child protection sub-committees) Numerator: Number of protection committees members (including child protection sub- committees); foster caregivers; UASC and at-risk children benefiting from case management services; children trained in SEL; SHLS Denominator: N/A

Percentage of UASC benefitting from temporary or longer-Custom This indicator aims to measure the quality of the 0% 100% (10 out of Monthly interview with children in temporary or UASC database; UASC follow-up sheets Monthly Child protection officers N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator was not measured at baseline; term alternative care arrangements and reporting alternative care placement, whether temporary 10 children) longer-term alternative care arrangement; The follow however, under the previous OFDA project, 100% satisfaction with placement on a monthly basis or long term up forms relating to the care placement will need to of identified unaccompanied and separated Numerator: # of children interviewed as part of ask a selection of questions which speak to the child’s children (6 children: 5 boys and 1 girl) received their regular follow up visits, who are satisfied with satisfaction. appropriate services namely case management, their placement. psychosocial support, referral for family tracing and Denominator: # of all children interviewed during reunification, material support, and follow up. The follow up visits IRC did not measure satisfaction under this project and thus does not have a baseline. The current project will continue to cover old cases and support new ones. Percentage of children who benefitted from a full Custom This indicator aims to measure how many children 0 90% (18 out of Analysis of assessment documents Case management records; An excel Monthly Child protection officers N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This is a new indicator and will be measured once assessment within two weeks of registration for case have a full assessment (including BIA) carried out 20) spreadsheet used to support case activities begin. management within 2 weeks of being registered. management should collect the date the Numerator: # of children registered for case assessment/BIA is completed and the management who have completed their date of the child is registered assessment/BIA within 2 weeks of registration Denominator: # of children registered for case management who have completed an assessment/BIA.

Sub-Sector Prevention and Response to Gender-Based Violence Number of dollars allocated for GBV programming OFDA This indicator should provide details on the specific 0 $ 135,329.00 Aggregate data from program data sources such as Program records, BVA reports, finance Quarterly WPE Manager N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A The IRC will begin to measure this indicator once amount of funding BVA/finance report reports activities start. allocated to the GBV sub-sector intervention. This is a required indicator, but is recognized by USAID/OFDA as one that will not monitor programmatic activities. Numerator: Dollar amount of funds expended on GBV programming. Number of individuals accessing GBV response services OFDA Accessing GBV response activities involves 150 cases (150 30 Aggregate data from various data sources related to This indicator will be reliant on program Monthly Women's Protection and Empowerement (WPE) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A The target of 30 only accounts for new GBV case individuals utilizing services including service women) and all of GBV response activities records, women’s officers management, whereas the indicator should include centers, action planning, group-based support them (100%) and girls’ space attendance and activity individuals accessing all kinds of GBV services. The activities, outreach, case management, or any benefitted from GBV records, and program supervision records. IRC will therefore revise the target and submit a other service that is responding to a need. These services, including: This request to OFDA. activities can be accessible to and relevant for any 43 new GBV data can be consolidated into semi-annual individual. This includes but is not limited to cases;107 old GBV and final reports. This indicator will be survivors of GBV. This can also include those at risk cases reliant on program records, such as of GBV, but who have not been exposed to GBVIMS any incident of GBV. Activities should be designed around an articulated objective and participation defined per activity to reflect the anticipated exposure intended to lead to the desired program results.

Number of people trained in GBV prevention and/or Custom Definition: This indicator aims to measure the 0 60 (40 women; Analysis of attendace sheets, projets reports Attendance sheets completed by Monthly WPE officers/WPE managers response, disaggregated by sex (excluding protection Number of people trained in GBV prevention 20 men) participants; training database committee members) and/or response, disaggregated by sex ; Protection committee members WILL NOT BE part of this indicator even if they are trained on GBV prevention and/or response. This will include community and religious leaders benefiting from refresher trainings

Percentage of GBV survivors reporting to the IRC for Custom Below are a number of definitions for terms 0 100% (30 out of Only the data of GBV survivors who (1) voluntarily The primary data source for this indicator Monthly WPE officers N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 98 people were trained under the previous OFDA assistance who received one supportive service within 48 related to the indicators, which are important to 30) identified and disclosed their experiences of violence to is the GBV Information Management project (AID-OFDA-G-15-00186). Some of these hours understand the scope of the indicator and its the IRC and (2) provided informed consent to share System (GBV IMS) and the child same individuals will receive refresher trainings measurement: her/his non-identifiable data (or consent of the child’s protection database while the target of 60 will also include newly - Supportive services is defined as the IASC or person living with mental disability’s primary trained individuals. recognized GBV and child protection response caretaker) for reporting purposes may be included in services. For the IRC, this includes: case the calculation of this indicator. management services; psychological care and/or psychosocial support; medical care; legal services; This indicator only applies for cases where IRC can security services; interim alternative provide at least one relevant service for the survivor. accommodation; emergency cash assistance; basic Referrals will also be calculated as a service as it will be support services, or livelihoods services. facilitated by the IRC. - This indicator measures GBV survivors who report for service. It does not measure nor infer prevalence of GBV in a given community. The indicator seeks to capture responsiveness of IRC to request for assistance that it receives from survivors as service delivery is key to helping ensure survivors are protected from further harm. Additionally, please note that any perpetrator profile can be included in this indicator. Verification of the perpetrator profile is not needed and that the survivor’s word should be considered valid and reliable. - All types of gender-based violence against women and girls are included in the definition of this indicator Numerator: Number of unique survivors of GBV incidents, reporting and consenting to services and who received at least one GBV service from the Sub-Sector Psychosocial Support Services IRC ithi 48 h f ti i t Number of individuals participating in psychosocial OFDA Participating in psychosocial activities involves 0 20 Aggregate data from various program data sources. This indicator will be reliant on program Monthly Protection officers N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once the project support services more than one-time casual exposure activities Semi-annual reporting can be limited to the number records, activity begins; it is important to note that it will measure designed to improve the psychosocial well-being. participating in a particular period. records, and program supervision records. newly identified persons with specific needs; it will Activities should be designed around an articulated not cover GBV and child protection cases, or PSNs objective and participation defined per activity to identified under the previous OFDA project (OFDA- reflect the anticipated exposure intended to lead G-15-00186). to the desired program results.

Numerator: Number of targeted members of the community or population participating in psychosocial activities

Percentage of PSN reporting improvement in their feeling Custom This indicator aims to measure the quality of case 0 80% (16 out of Individual surveys will be conducted with PSN PSN data base and individual survey Monthly Protection officers N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured at the end of the of wellbeing and their ability to cope at the end of the management services for PSN. 20) participating in case management, at the start and at sheets project. project or at case closure the end of the particular service (or at the end of the Numerator: Number of people who express an project). Informed consent will be obtained before improvement in their feeling of wellbeing and their delivery of the survey tool. Note that neither cases ability to cope at the end of the project or at case that move from their original location before the end closure of the case management nor people who do not provide consent to use the tool will not be included in Denominator: Total number of PSN benefitting the calculation of the %. from case management who did the individual survey. Note that neither cases that move from their original location before the end of the case management nor people who do not provide consent to use the tool will not be included in the calculation of the %.

Sector Agriculture and Food Security Sub-Sector Improving Agricultural Production/Food Security Number of hectares under improved agricultural methods OFDA This indicator measures the number of hectares 0 2 Physical measurement of productive area. Endline Maps, GPS perimeter walks, and end of End of the project Community mobilizers will be responsible for N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator was not measured at baseline. that receive treatment using improved surveys will be conduced , involving the use of project household survey collecting data in the field. A team of surveyors will agricultural methods due to USAID/OFDA-funded questionnaires for beneficiaries that are qualitative be hired and trained in the beginning of the project Number of months of household food self-sufficiency as a OFDA The indicator measures the number of people 4.4 6.4 Actual harvest data where possible. When an actual Records of land areas planted with End of the project The community Mobilizer will resposanble to collect Household questionnaire; interview head of All of the agriculture beneficiaries (100) were November 7 - 13, 2018 in 2 villages: Lawan Adjiri There are in total 2 villages that will be covered by N/A The revised target here of 6.4 months reflects 2 result of improved agricultural production programming receiving feed for livestock. IRC will identify these measure (pre- and post-intervention) is not feasible, a specific crops, records of usual in the field. A pool of surveyors will be hire and train household interviewed. and Bolomiram. agriculture activities and both were captured in the additional months of food sufficiency on top of the people through the HEA approach. Food self- projected increase or an informed estimate is (anticipated) harvest yields of the crops in the beginning of the project to suppport the survey. baseline (of 4.4) sufficiency is defined as physical and economic acceptable (especially based on harvest projection and plants per unit of land area. community Mobilizer for this survey. Eah survey access to adequate food for all household area planted), since harvest may not occur within the Househoold Survey with Beneficiary. will be suprevise by livelhoods and M&E Officier in Number of people directly benefiting from improving OFDA The indicator will assess the number of people who 0 100 heads of Collect data from beneficiary lists, assessment and/or Distribution lists, program reports Quarterly Community mobilizers will be responsible for N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator was not measured at baseline. agricultural production and/or food security activities will receive agricultural support from IRC; household (50 surveys, routine monitoring, and project records. Post- (beneficiary lists, assessment and/or collecting data in the field. The M&E Officer will including the distribution of seeds and agricultural men; 50 distribution monitoring (PDM) will be carried out using survey data, routine conduct follow-up visits for on-site data verification tools. The number of beneficiaries (real or close women); 700 questionnaires collected by mobile phone throuth an monitoring, and project records) to ensure quality of data collected. estimate) of USAID/OFDA-funded activities to individuals total interview. Total USD value of vouchers redeemed by beneficiaries OFDA Voucher: A paper, token, or electronic instrument $0 $ 8,000 Data for this indicator will be collected on the basis of Distribution lists, program reports, supply End of each distribution Distribution and M&E officers will be responsible N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator was not measured at baseline. that can be exchanged for a set quantity or value the total number of recipients in households served. It chain records fordata collection Sub-Sector Livestock f d t ti i ti d ill b b d th i f h b fi i h h ld Number of animals owned per individual OFDA This indicator counts the number of domestic 3 4 Collect data from survey or government statistics at Survey or official government statistics Quarterly Community mobilizers will be responsible for Household questionnaire; interview head of All agriculture beneficiaries (100) were November 7 - 13, 2018 in 2 villages: Lawan Adjiri There are in total 2 villages that will be covered by N/A N/A animals owned by individuals who have two time points, before start of the project (baseline) specific to area of collecting data in the field. The M&E Officer will household interviewed. and Bolomiram. agriculture activities and both were captured in the directly benefited from USAID/OFDA-funded and at end of project (or other established interval). intervention (distribution lists, program conduct follow-up visits for on-site data verification survey. Number of animals benefiting from livestock activities OFDA This indicator counts the number of domesticated 0 950 Primary data collection: Count, verify, and record the Distribution lists and/or ledgers, Quarterly Community mobilizers will be responsible for N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once activities animals that benefit as a result of their owners number of animals. On-site PDM will be carried out assessment and/or survey collecting data in the field. The M&E Officer will begin. receiving goods participating in or otherwise using questionnaires collected by mobile phone data and project records conduct follow-up visits for on-site data verification Number of people benefiting from livestock activities OFDA This indicator counts the number of people that 0 800 heads of Primary data collection: Count and record the number Beneficiary lists and/or ledgers, Quarterly Community mobilizers will be responsible for N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once activities receive goods, participate in, or otherwise are household (400 of people who directly received livelihoods restoration assessment and/or survey collecting data in the field. The M&E Officer will begin. directly assisted by USAID/OFDA-funded project men; 400 assistance. PDM will be carried out using data, and project records (distribution conduct follow-up visits for on-site data verification Sub-Sector Veterinary Pharmaceuticals and other Medical Commodities (VPMC) Number of animal disease outbreaks OFDA This indicates the number of animal disease 1 14 The IRC will report against this indicator at the Records of the Regional Direction of Monthly The Food Security & Livehoods Manager based in This value is provided by the Regional Direction of Regional Direction of Livestock survey in Diffa. N/A N/A N/A N/A outbreaks recorded at the regional level by the regional level, using the data made available upon Livestock in Diffa. Diffa will be responsible for data collection to Livestock in Diffa. Regional Direction of Livestock. Therefore, it request by the Regional Direction of Livestock in Diffa. report against this indicator. indirectly shows the impact of animal health interventions conducted in Diffa region, such as the IRC's. The IRC hopes that the training and equipment of five new para-veterinarians in the region will contribute to achieving a better result during the project year than during the civil year 2017 for instance. However, the IRC cannot guarantee that the action of the five para- veterinarians will have a major impact on the epizootic situation of the entire region. Therefore the IRC’s animal health intervention does not set a target reflecting a reduction in the number of disease outbreaks, but rather aims to see the number of disease outbreaks compared to last year not increase.

Number of animals treated or vaccinated OFDA This indicator counts the number of domesticated 0 200 Collect data from beneficiary lists, assessment and/or Distribution lists and/or ledgers, Quarterly Community mobilizers will be responsible for N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator was not the subject of a baseline animals that were directly given a pharmaceutical surveys, routine monitoring, and project records assessment and/or survey data, and collecting data in the field. The M&E Officer will survey (e.g., antibiotic, acaricide) to cure a disease project records conduct follow-up visits for on-site data verification Sub-Sector Pests and pesticides Number and percentage of people practicing appropriate OFDA This indicator assesses the number and 0 and 0% 60 out 100 Visual inspection of practical crop protection exercise, Training records; project records Quarterly Community mobilizers will be responsible for N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once activities crop protection procedures corresponding percentage of USAID/OFDA-trained people trained consultation with beneficiaries. collecting data in the field. The M&E Officer will begin. beneficiaries that demonstrate appropriate (60%) conduct follow-up visits for on-site data verification identification, remove and/or kill pests and to ensure quality of data collected. Number of people trained in appropriate crop protection OFDA This indicator accounts for the number of 0 100 Direct counting of people trained; observation of Project records (distribution lists, program Quarterly Community mobilizers will be responsible for N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once activities practices beneficiaries who directly received USAID/OFDA- beneficiary performances; collection of data from reports), Monitoring records, MoA/Gov collecting data in the field. The M&E Officer will begin. Sector Shelter and Settlements Sub-Sector Shelter Number and percentage of households having received OFDA This indicator relates the number of households in 0 1,305 out 1,450 Enumeration of people receiving shelter assistance. List of beneficiaries and post During and after each M&E team N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once activities shelter assistance affected project settlements receiving (90%) During the distribution, representative of household's implementation monitoring distribution begin. USAID/OFDA-funded/supported shelter to the beneficiaries will sign a beneficiaries list. One month total number of households living in the after the distribution, a post implementation affected project settlements at the time of the monitoring will be organised disaster/crisis. The number of households supported by the program includes those who have benefited from USAID/OFDA support. The total affected population should be an estimate of the disaster-affected area based on a reasonable balance of donor, government, and other stakeholder impact assessment.

Number of targeted households with access to shelter OFDA This indicator measures 0 1450 Enumeration of beneficiary households with access to d During and after each M&E team N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once activities households that, through USAID/OFDA funding or (occupancy of) shelter provided as part of project distribution begin. support, have sufficient covered activities. During the distribution, representative of living space to provide dignified accommodation household's beneficiaries will sign a beneficiaries list. according to Sphere Project standards. One month after the distribution, a PDM survey will be organised.

Number of targeted households with access to shelter OFDA This indicator individually counts any household in 0 1450 Enumeration of beneficiary households with access to Post implementation monitoring After each distribution M&E team N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once activities pursuant to relevant guidance appearing in the Sphere an USAID/OFDA-supported or provided shelter (occupancy of) shelter consistent with Sphere Project begin. Project Handbook consistent with Sphere Project guidance. Shelter guidance provided as part of project activities. One refers to covered month after the distribution, a post implementation living space within a structure that provides monitoring will be organised. 1. Adequate space and protection from cold, damp, sun, rain, wind, or other threats to health; 2. A location where essential household activities can be satisfactorily undertaken; and 3. A location where livelihood support activities can be pursued, as required. According to Sphere Project guidance, people should have sufficient covered living space to provide dignified accommodation, including where possible and practical, minimally adequate covered living space of 3.5 square meters per person.

Sub-Sector S&S Non-Food Items Number and percentage of households appropriately Custom This indicator assesses the number and 0 and 0% 725 out 1,450 Observation; and Enumeration of people receiving Post distribution monitoring After each distribution M&E team N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once activities using the distributed LLINs corresponding percentage of trained households (50%) distribution of essential NFI kits (LLIN) who begin. that demonstrate appropriate use of LLINs after appropriately use LLINs they received when surveyed distribution of essential NFI kits. Numerator :# of two months following receipt of their NFI assistance, number of trained households that demonstrate and relating that total to the total number of people appropriate use of LLINs after distribution of receiving NFI assistance who also complete the survey. essential NFI kits. Surveyors ensure that only one person per household is Denominator: # of all trained households who surveyed. Also ensure that there is no receive essential NFI kits (LLIN recipients). double-counting. Finally, describe the criteria of election/sampling, and sample size.

Number and percentage of households receiving NFIs OFDA This indicator counts the total number of people 0 1,305 out of During the distribution, representative of household's List of beneficiaries and PDM monitoring During and after each M&E team N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once activities and households receiving NFI assistance (either via 1,450 (90%) beneficiaries will sign a beneficiaries list. One month distribution begin. in-kind provision or cash/vouchers) as part of an after the distribution, a post implementation USAID/OFDAfunded/supported monitoring will be organised project. Information on type of NFIs received collected as part of proposed activities (and documented as part of another Indicator in this sub-sector) can be linked to beneficiary characteristics in this indicator.

Number and percentage of people reporting satisfaction OFDA This indicator individually counts people receiving 0 8,120 out of Enumeration of people receiving NFI assistance (either Post distribution monitoring After each distribution M&E team N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once activities with the quality of the NFIs they received NFI assistance (either in-kind or via cash/vouchers) 10,150 (80%) in-kind or via cash/vouchers) who report satisfaction begin. who report satisfaction with the quality of the NFIs with the quality of the NFIs they received when they received when surveyed two months surveyed two months (or more; can be up to 5 or 6 following receipt of their USAID/OFDA-funded NFI months) following receipt of their USAID/OFDA-funded assistance. NFI assistance, and relating that total to the total number of people receiving NFI assistance who also complete the survey. Ensure that only one person per household is surveyed. Also ensure that there is no double-counting. Finally, describe the criteria of election/sampling, and sample size.

Total number and per item USD cost of NFIs distributed, OFDA This indicator counts the number and cost of Non- 0 1,450 minimum Enumeration of the number and cost of NFI Invoice for kit items and distribution list After purchases and each Finance team and M&E team N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This indicator will be measured once activities by type (e.g. mats, blankets, kitchen sets, other) Food Items (NFIs) distributed as part of an kits (worth USD distributed, by type. Analysis of kit invoices and signed distribution begin. USAID/OFDA-funded/supported activity by type of 72 each); 1,450 lists of beneficiaries. NFI. kitchen kits (worth USD 13 each) Semiannual Report 1 Semiannual Report 2 Final (August 2018 - March 2019) (April - September 2019) (October 2018 - September 2019) Target WASH Protection Ag & Food Security Shelter WASH Protection Ag & Food Security Shelter WASH Protection Ag & Food Security Shelter Total IDP Total IDP Total IDP Total IDP Total IDP Total IDP Total IDP Total IDP Total IDP Total IDP Total IDP Total IDP Total IDP Award Level Beneficiaries (Cumulative) 26280 14580 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 17750 9900 Protection 3710 2597 Agriculture and Food Security 6300 2520 Shelter & Settlements 10150 8120 Reporting Period Reached: Total: 15,359; IDPs: 8,728 Total: XXX; IDPs: YYY Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 4976 2190 Protection 1135 795 Agriculture and Food Security 6300 1750 Shelter & Settlements 4788 4788 Cumulative Period Reached: Total: 15,359; IDPs: 8,728 Total: XXX; IDPs: YYY Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 4976 2190 Protection 1135 795 Agriculture and Food Security 6300 1750 Shelter & Settlements 4788 4788 Semi-Annual 1 Semi-Annual 2 Indicator Baseline Target Final (Aug 2018 - March 2019) (Apr - Sept 2019) Total % of target met Number of people receiving direct hygiene promotion OFDA (excluding mass media 0 17,750 4476 campaigns and without double- counting)

Percent of households targeted by the hygiene 70% (1,775 OFDA promotion program who store 44% out of 44% their drinking water safely in 2,536) clean containers Percent of people targeted by the hygiene promotion 75% OFDA program who know at least 69% (13,313 out 69% three (3) of the five (5) critical of 17,750) times to wash hands Percent of households targeted by the hygiene 50% (1,268 OFDA promotion program with no 0 out of 0% evidence of feces in the living 2,536) area Semi-Annual 1 Semi-Annual 2 Indicator Baseline Target Final (Aug 2018 - March 2019) (Apr - Sept 2019) Total % of target met Number of people directly utilizing OFDA improved sanitation services provided 0 3,500 0 with OFDA funding Percent of households targeted by 75% (375 latrine construction/promotion OFDA 0% out of 0 program whose latrines are completed 500) and clean Percent of latrines/defecation sites in 60% (300 the target population with OFDA 0% out of 0 handwashing facilities that are 500) functional and in use Semi-Annual 1 Semi-Annual 2 Target Final Indicator Baseline (Aug 2018 - March 2019) (Apr - Sept 2019) M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total % of target met Number of people directly utilizing OFDA improved water services provided with 0 10,750 275 225 500 OFDA funding Percent of households targeted by WASH program that are collecting all water for OFDA 76% 80% (1,229 out of 1,536 households) 76% drinking, cooking, and hygiene from improved water sources

Percent of water points developed, OFDA repaired, or rehabilitated with 0 fecal 0% 100% (8 out of 8) 25% coliforms per 100 ml sample Percent of households whose drinking OFDA water supplies have a free residual 0% 70% (1,000 out of 1,429) 0 chlorine (FRC) > 0.2 mg/L

Percent of water user committees created OFDA and/or trained by the WASH program 0% 75% (6 out of 8) 0 that are active at least three (3) months after training Semi-Annual 1 Semi-Annual 2 Target Final Indicator Baseline (Aug 2018 - March 2019) (Apr - Sept 2019) M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total % of target met Total number of people receiving WASH OFDA NFIs assistance through all modalities 0 10,500 (1,500 households) 0 (without double-counting)

Percent of households reporting satisfaction with the contents of the OFDA 0% 75% (1,125 out 1,500 households) 0 WASH NFIs received through direct distribution (i.e. kits) or vouchers

Percent of households reporting OFDA satisfaction with the quality of WASH 0% 75% (1,125 out 1,500 households) 0 NFIs received through direct distribution (i.e. kits), vouchers, or cash Total USD value of vouchers redeemed OFDA 0% 138,000 0 by beneficiaries Semi-Annual 1 Semi-Annual 2 Baseline Target Final Indicator (Aug 2018 - March 2019) (Apr - Sept 2019) M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total % of target met

Number of individuals trained in OFDA 0 60 40 100 86 63 149 protection

Number and percentage of communities in the project that IRC 5 (22%) 23 out of 23 (100%) 20 out of 23 (87%) have prepared and implemented Community Safety Action Plans Semi-Annual 1 Semi-Annual 2 Baseline Target Final Indicator (Aug 2018 - March 2019) (Apr - Sept 2019) M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total % of target met Number of dollars allocated for child OFDA 0 $135,605 $5,505 protection programming

Number of individuals participating in OFDA 461 1298 428 429 857 child protection services

Percentage of UASC benefitting from temporary or longer-term alternative IRC care arrangements and reporting 0% 100% (10 out of 10 children) 100% (7 out of 7children) satisfaction with placement on a monthly basis Percentage of children who benefitted from a full assessment within two IRC 0% 90% (18 out of 20) 100% (18 out of 18 children) weeks of registration for case management Semi-Annual 1 Semi-Annual 2 Baseline Target Final Indicator (Aug 2018 - March 2019) (Apr - Sept 2019) M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total % of target met Number of dollars allocated for GBV OFDA 0 $135,329 $7,358 programming 150 cases (150 Number of individuals accessing GBV women) and all of OFDA 150 30 9 110 119 response services them (100%) benefitted from Number of people trained in GBV prevention and/or response, IRC 0 20 40 60 12 8 20 disaggregated by sex (excluding protection committee members)

Percentage of GBV survivors reporting IRC 0% 100% (30 out of 30) 100% to the IRC for assistance who received one supportive service within 48 hours Semi-Annual 1 Semi-Annual 2 Baseline Target Final Indicator (Aug 2018 - March 2019) (Apr - Sept 2019) M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total % of target met

Number of individuals participating in OFDA 0 20 0 10 10 psychosocial support services

Percentage of PSN reporting improvement in their feeling of wellbeing and their ability IRC 0 0 0% 80% (16 out of 20) 0 [1] to cope at the end of the project or at case closure

[1] As described in the indicator, this will be measured at endline. Semi-Annual 1 Semi-Annual 2 Baseline Target Final Indicator (Aug 2018 - March 2019) (Apr - Sept 2019) M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total % of target met Number of hectares under improved OFDA 0 2 2 agricultural methods

Number of months of household food self- OFDA sufficiency as a result of improved 4.4 6.4 4.4 [1] agricultural production programming

Number of people directly benefiting from 100 heads of household (50 100 heads of household (65 men; 35 OFDA improving agricultural production and/or 0 men; 50 women); 700 women); 700 individuals total food security activities individuals total

Total USD value of vouchers redeemed by OFDA $0 $8,000 $6,916 beneficiaries

[1] Will be evaluated at the endline. Semi-Annual 1 Semi-Annual 2 Baseline Target Final Indicator (Aug 2018 - March 2019) (Apr - Sept 2019) M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total % of target met OFDA Number of animals owned per individual 3 4 4

Number of animals benefiting from OFDA 0 950 2050 livestock activities 800 heads of household (400 800 heads of household (352 men; 448 Number of people benefiting from OFDA 0 men; 400 women); 5,600 women); 5,600 individuals in total (2,464 livestock activities individuals in total men, 3,136 women) Semi-Annual 1 Semi-Annual 2 Final Indicator Baseline Target (Aug 2018 - March 2019) (Apr - Sept 2019) Total % of target met OFDA Number of animal disease outbreaks 1 14 0

OFDA 0 200 332 Number of animals treated or vaccinated Semiannual Report 1 Semiannual Report 2 Baseline Target Final Indicator (October 2018 - March 2019) (April - September 2019) M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total % of target met Number and percentage of people OFDA practicing appropriate crop protection procedures # 0 60 of 100 people 100 % 0% 60% 100% Number of people trained in OFDA appropriate crop protection 0 100 35 65 100 practices Semi-Annual 1 Semi-Annual 2 Final Indicator Baseline Target (Oct 18 - March 19) (Apr - Sept 19) Total % of target met Number and percentage of OFDA households having received shelter assistance # 0 1,305 out 1,450 973 % 0 90% 67% Number of targeted households OFDA 0 1450 973 with access to shelter Number of targeted households with access to shelter pursuant to OFDA 0 1450 973 relevant guidance appearing in the Sphere Project Handbook Semiannual Report 1 Semiannual Report 2 Baseline Target Final Indicator (October 2018 - March 2019) (April - September 2019) M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total % of target met Number and percentage of households appropriately using the distributed LLINs IRC # 0 725 out of 1,450 316 % 0% 50% 56%

Number and percentage of households OFDA receiving NFIs # 0 1,305 out of 1,450 564 % 0% 90% 39% Number and percentage of people reporting satisfaction with the quality of the OFDA NFIs they received # 0 8,120 out of 10,150 2529 % 0% 80% 99% Total number and per item USD cost of NFIs 1,450 minimum kits (worth USD 564 minimum kits worth USD 72 OFDA distributed, by type (e.g. mats, blankets, 0 72 each); 1,450 kitchen kits each; 564 kitchen kits worth USD kitchen sets, other) (worth USD 13 each) 13 each