Exclusive Backward-Angle Omega Meson Electroproduction, in an Oral Examination Held on October 20, 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exclusive Backward-Angle Omega Meson Electroproduction, in an Oral Examination Held on October 20, 2017 Exclusive Backward-Angle Omega Meson Electroproduction A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of Regina By Wenliang Li Regina, Saskatchewan October, 2017 c 2017: Wenliang Li arXiv:1712.03214v2 [nucl-ex] 11 Dec 2017 UNIVERSITY OF REGINA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH SUPERVISORY AND EXAMINING COMMITTEE Wenliang Li, candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosohy in Physics, has presented a thesis titled, Exclusive Backward-Angle Omega Meson Electroproduction, in an oral examination held on October 20, 2017. The following committee members have found the thesis acceptable in form and content, and that the candidate demonstrated satisfactory knowledge of the subject material. External Examiner: *Dr. Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Supervisor: Dr. Garth Huber, Department of Physics Committee-Member: *Dr. David Hornidge, Adjunct Committee Member: Dr. Zisis Papandreou, Department of Physics Committee Member: Dr. George Lolos, Adjunct Committee Member: **Dr. Allan East, Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry Chair of Defense: Dr. Karen Meagher, Faculty of Graduate Studies & Research *Participated via video conference **Not present at defense Abstract Exclusive meson electroproduction at different squared four-momenta of the exchanged virtual photon, Q2, and at different four-momentum transfers, t and u, can be used to probe QCD’s transition from hadronic degrees of freedom at the long distance scale to quark-gluon degrees of freedom at the short distance scale. Backward-angle meson electroproduction was previously ignored, but is anticipated to offer complimentary information to conventional forward-angle meson electroproduction studies on nucleon structure. This work is a pioneering study of backward-angle ω cross sections through the exclusive 1H(e, e′p)ω reaction using the missing mass reconstruction technique. The extracted cross sec- tions are separated into the transverse (T), longitudinal (L), and LT, TT interference terms. The analyzed data were part of experiment E01-004 (Fπ-2), which used 2.6-5.2 GeV electron beams and HMS+SOS spectrometers in Jefferson Lab Hall C. The primary objective was to detect coincidence π in the forward-angle, where the backward-angle ω events were fortuitously detected. The experiment has central Q2 values of 1.60 and 2.45 GeV2, at W = 2.21 GeV. There was significant coverage in φ and ǫ, which allowed separation of σT,L,LT,TT. The data set has a unique u coverage of u 0, which corresponds to t> 4 GeV2. − ∼ − The separated σ result suggest a flat 1/Q1.33±1.21 dependence, whereas σ seems to hold T ∼ L 9.43±6.28 2 2 a stronger 1/Q dependence. The σL/σT ratio indicate σT dominance at Q = 2.45 GeV at the 90% confidence level. ∼ After translating the results into the t space of the published CLAS data, our data show − evidence of a backward-angle ω electroproduction peak at both Q2 settings. Previously, this phenomenon showing both forward and backward-angle peaks was only observed in the meson photoproduction data. Through comparison of our σT data with the prediction of the Transition Distribution Ampli- tude (TDA) model, and signs of σT dominance, promising indications of the applicability of the TDA factorization are demonstrated at a much lower Q2 value than its preferred range of Q2 > 10 GeV2. These studies have opened a new means to study the transition of the nucleon wavefunction through backward-angle experimental observables. Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Garth Huber for encouraging me to undertake this Ph.D. project and for his continuous support through the development of this work, and for his meticulous and patient guidance. Working with him has been a deeply ed- ucational and challenging experience. I also cherish the personal bond that we manage to create along these years. I am also very grateful to Henk Blok and Dave Gaskell for their extremely valuable suggestions, comments and supports during this work. A special thanks to Tanja Horn for her great work on generating data Ntuples, this has significantly simplified the analysis. Great appreciation to Jean-Phillipe Lansberg, Bernard Pire, Krill Semenov and Lech Szy- manowski, for providing the invaluable theoretical (TDA model) calculations. Visions offered by Christian Weiss and Mark Strikman have played a critical role throughout the thesis writing. Furthermore, I want to thank the research funding provided by NSERC of Canada and the FGSR of the University of Regina. Since the beginning, Department of Physics has provided amazing supports for my education and research. I would like to thank all members of the depart- ment, include Nader Mobed, George Lolos, Zisis Papandreou, Mauricio Barbi, Pierre Ouimet, Andrei Semenov, Cheryl Risling, Derek Gervais and others. I am also grateful to all the friends and colleagues met at the university: Dilli Paudyal, Ahmed Zafar, Ahmed Foda, Sameep Basnet, Tegan Beattie, Ryan Ambrose, Rory Evans, Nathanael Hogan and others. Together, we have created a pleasant working environment and they really had to put up with my loudness. Finally I would like to dedicate this work to my parents, the Morrison family and the relatives for their kind support and hospitality throughout these years, and most importantly to my wife who cooks wonderfully. This thesis is dedicated to my family Contents Abstract Acknowledgements Dedication Table of Contents i List of Tables vii List of Figures ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 DynamicalPropertiesofHadrons. ...... 4 1.2 Electron Scattering: Access to Hadron Structure . ............ 6 1.3 ExperimentalKinematicsandMethodology . ........ 8 1.3.1 InteractionReferenceFrame . ... 8 1.3.2 MandelstamVariables . 8 1.3.3 Exclusive ω MesonElectroproduction . 10 1.3.4 L/TSeparation ............................... 13 1.4 TheFπ-2Experiment ................................ 15 1.5 Past Exclusive ω ElectroproductionExperiments . 16 2 Literature review on Backward-Angle ω Meson Production 19 i 2.1 u-ChannelPhysicsOverview . 20 2.1.1 Gateway to u-Channel Physics: t-ChannelPhysics . 22 2.2 ReggeTrajectoryModel .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 25 2.2.1 ReggeTrajectory .............................. 25 2.2.2 u and t KinematicLimits.......................... 27 2.2.3 ReggeTrajectoryinMesonProduction . .... 30 2.2.4 VGLandJMLModels ........................... 31 2.3 GPDandTDA ................................... 34 2.3.1 Two Predictions from TDA Collinear Factorization . ......... 38 3 Experimental Apparatus 40 3.1 Overview ...................................... 40 3.2 Accelerator ..................................... 41 3.3 HallC........................................ 42 3.4 Beamline ...................................... 43 3.4.1 BeamPositionMonitors . 43 3.4.2 BeamEnergyMeasurement . 47 3.4.3 BeamCurrentMonitors . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 49 3.4.4 ModificationtoBeamline . 50 3.5 Targets........................................ 51 3.5.1 Cryogenic Targets: LH2 .......................... 52 3.5.2 TargetThickness .............................. 53 3.6 Detectors ...................................... 55 3.6.1 DriftChamber ............................... 56 3.6.2 Hodoscopes................................. 57 3.6.3 CherenkovDetectors . 59 3.6.4 LeadGlassCalorimeter. 60 3.6.5 HMSAerogelCherenkovDetector. .. 61 ii 3.7 TriggerSystem ................................... 62 3.7.1 HMSPre-trigger .............................. 63 3.7.2 SOSPre-trigger............................... 65 3.8 SpectrometerAcceptanceandOptics . ....... 66 3.9 Determination of the Spectrometer Kinematic Offsets . ............. 67 4 SIMC and New Analysis Software 70 4.1 SIMC ........................................ 70 4.1.1 SpectrometerModels. 71 4.1.2 IonizationEnergyLoss. 72 4.1.3 MultipleScattering . 73 4.1.4 RadiativeProcess.............................. 74 4.1.5 MonteCarloYield ............................. 76 4.2 TheNewC++AnalysisPlatform . ... 77 5 Heep Data Analysis 81 5.1 DataSelectionandCorrection . ..... 82 5.1.1 ParticleIdentificationinSOSandHMS . .... 82 5.1.2 CoincidenceTimingvs.ParticleSpeed intheHMS . ....... 83 5.1.3 EventSelectionCriteria . .. 86 5.2 BackgroundSubtraction . ... 87 5.2.1 RandomCoincidenceBackgroundSubtraction . ...... 87 5.2.2 Cell Wall Contribution and Dummy Target Data Subtraction ....... 87 5.3 EfficiencyStudy.................................. 88 5.3.1 AnalysisInformation. 88 5.3.2 ComputerandElectronicLiveTime . ... 89 5.3.2.1 ElectronicLiveTime . 90 5.3.2.2 ComputerLiveTime . 94 5.3.3 SpectrometerTrackingEfficiencies . ..... 96 iii 5.3.3.1 ChoiceofHMSTrackingEfficiency . 98 5.3.3.2 ChoiceofSOSTrackingEfficiency . 100 5.3.4 CarbonTargetRateStudy . 101 5.3.5 LH2 TargetBoilingStudy . .106 5.3.6 SOSCoincidenceBlocking . 108 5.3.7 HMSAerogelCherenkovDetectorThresholdCuts . .. ..110 5.3.8 HMS ACD Cut Study for the ω Analysis .................112 5.3.9 hsbeta Distributionand ProtonInteraction Correction . 114 5.4 MissingmassandEnergyDistributions . .......120 5.5 SimulatingtheHeepReaction . .122 5.6 HeepStudyResults ................................ 124 5.6.1 HeepCoincidenceStudy . 124 5.6.2 HeepSinglesStudy.............................126 5.6.3 HeepwithDifferentParametrizations . .. ..127 5.7 Results........................................128 6 Omega Analysis 129 6.1 Overview and Introduction to the Iterative Procedure . .............129 6.2 PhysicsSimulationModelinSIMC . .132 6.2.1 ω ProductionModel ............................133
Recommended publications
  • Strange Particle Theory in the Cosmic Ray Period R
    STRANGE PARTICLE THEORY IN THE COSMIC RAY PERIOD R. Dalitz To cite this version: R. Dalitz. STRANGE PARTICLE THEORY IN THE COSMIC RAY PERIOD. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1982, 43 (C8), pp.C8-195-C8-205. 10.1051/jphyscol:1982811. jpa-00222371 HAL Id: jpa-00222371 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00222371 Submitted on 1 Jan 1982 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE Colloque C8, suppldment au no 12, Tome 43, ddcembre 1982 page ~8-195 STRANGE PARTICLE THEORY IN THE COSMIC RAY PERIOD R.H. Dalitz Department of Theoretical Physics, 2 KebZe Road, Oxford OX1 3NP, U.K. What role did theoretical physicists play concerning elementary particle physics in the cosmic ray period? The short answer is that it was the nuclear forces which were the central topic of their attention at that time. These were considered to be due primarily to the exchange of pions between nucleons, and the study of all aspects of the pion-nucleon interactions was the most direct contribution they could make to this problem. Of course, this was indeed a most important topic, and much significant understanding of the pion-nucleon interaction resulted from these studies, although the precise nature of the nucleonnucleon force is not settled even to this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Precision Cross Section Measurements in Hall C
    Precision Cross Section Measurements in Hall C Hall C focusing spectrometers Tanja Horn Neutral Particle Spectrometer 3D Nucleon Tomography Workshop March 15-17, 2017, Jefferson Lab 1 The 3D Nucleon Structure Generalized Parton and Transverse Momentum Distributions are essential for our understanding of internal hadron structure and the dynamics that bind the most basic elements of Nuclear Physics 5D TMDs – Confined motion in a nucleon (semi-inclusive DIS) 3D GPDs – Spatial imaging (exclusive DIS) Requires − High luminosity − Polarized beams and targets Major new capability with JLab12 2 NSAC 2015 Long Range Plan “Precision measurements in semi-inclusive pion and kaon production from unpolarized, as well as longitudinally and transversely polarized proton … targets in the JLab 12 GeV era will allow access to both flavor and spin dependent transverse momentum distributions in the valence quark region.” “Multiple instruments bring essential elements to this campaign: … HMS-SHMS and the … NPS” “Some of the most important tools for describing hadrons are Generalized Parton Distributions, [which] can be investigated through the analysis of hard exclusive processes” “The HMS-SHMS …[and] the NPS will allow …refined high resolution imaging of the nucleon’s internal landscape…” Experimental Access to GPDs: DVCS See also talks by, e.g. F-X Girod, C. Hyde Cleanest way to probe GPDs As the DVCS process interferes with BH one can access the DVCS amplitudes 4 Towards spin-flavor separation: DVMP See also talks by, e.g. F-X Girod, C. Hyde Exclusive
    [Show full text]
  • Nljkü^EF NATIONAAL INSTITUUT VOOR KERNFYSICA EN HOGE-ENERGIEFYSICA
    NlJKÜ^EF NATIONAAL INSTITUUT VOOR KERNFYSICA EN HOGE-ENERGIEFYSICA NIKHFl'-H IM-'JI Prospects for direct measurement of time-integrated BH mixing Ivar Siccama XIKÏIKF-II. P.O. Box 41882 100!) DB Amsterdam June 10. 1994 Abstract This note investigates the prospects of measuring time-integrated B, mixing. Three inclusive decay modes of the B, meson are discussed. For each reconstruction mode, the expected number of events and the different background channels are discussed. Estimates are given for the uncertainty on the mixing parameter \,. NIKHEF SECTIE -H POSTBUS 41882,1009 DB AMSTERDAM in KS0Ot934i29 R: FI -— - „nr 0EOO8130736 •DE008130736* 1 Introduction The production of B mesons at LEP is a mixture of B+. B°d and B°} mesons. The time integrated mixing parameter \ is an average quantity that reflects this mixture of Bd and B" mesons: \ = fd\d + f,\s Here \^ is the probability tliat the original B.t meson decays as a B1. and /j and ƒ, are the fractions of B° and B, mesons produced in the fragmentation of the b quark. The combined measurements of ALEPH, DELPHI. L3 and OPAL give [4]: \ = 0.119 ±0.012 From this a value for \, can be deduced l: \s = 0.45 ± 0.07(x-a) ± 0.10(x) ± M ƒ) The error on the value of \, is dominated by the uncertainty in the parameters fd and ƒ,, indicated by A( ƒ). These fractions are model dependent and therefore hard to estimate. In this note fd = 0.4 and ƒ, = 0.12 are used. The value of \<t that was used to deduce \, comes from measurements of CLEO and ARGUS [6, 8] where B mesons are produced below the production threshold of the Bs, at the T(45) resonance: \d = 0.162 ±0.021 A direct way to measure \, is to use an enriched sample of B, mesons.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Methods of Meson Mass Determination A
    A STUDY OF THE METHODS OF MESON MASS DETERMINATION A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Division of Graduate Studies Georgia Institute of Technology In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Physics by Gilbert Carl Knollman June 1950 r 642 ii A STUDY OF THE METHODS OF MESA f- MASS DETERMINATION Approved: ra■•■•■■■■■■•■ Date Approved by Chairman /227 1 9. c-n iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincerest thanks to Doctor L. D. Wyly for his valuable assistance in preparing this work. I would also like to thank my wife, Hilda, for her aid in proofreading the material. iv • TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 1 Statement of the Problem 1 Discussion of the Problem 3 Definition of Terms and Symbols Used . s 9 II. MESON HISTORY" 12 III. GENERAL APPARATUS EMPLOYED IN MESON MASS MEASURE- ENTS 19 IV. GENERAL Mi, THOD3 OF MEASURING RAN CE, CURVATURE, AND SPECIFIC IONIZATION 37 V. DIRECT METHODS OF MESON MASS DETERMINATION. 46 Elastic Collision 46 VI. INDIRECT METHODS OP MESON MASS DETERMINATION. 58 Range and Curvature 58 Momentum Loss 73 Ionization and Curvature 98 Method A: Primary Ionization of Slow Electrons and Curva- ture 98 Method B: Probable Ionization and Curvature 106 Ionization and Rahge 111 VII. PHOTOGRAPHIC PLATE METHODS OF MESON MASS DETERMI- NATION 119 Coulumb Scattering 125 Grain Counting 133 Magnetic Deflection 140 VIII. OTHR MSPHODS OF MESON MASS DETERMINATION . 152 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) ♦ CHAPTER PAGE Neutron-Proton Exchange Force . 152 Deflection in Combined Electric and Magnetic Fields 152 Disintegration 155 Photographic Technique 155 Cloud-Chamber Technique 160 Meso-States 162 IX.
    [Show full text]
  • A Few Comments on the Top Quark Measurements Kirill Melnikov TTP
    A few comments on the top quark measurements Kirill Melnikov TTP KIT Tuesday, November 17, 15 The outline I want to make a few comments concerning the top quark mass measurement at a hadron collider. These comments do not address specific measurements, or suggest particular improvements, or sharply point problems with existing analyses. What I am going to tell you are really just a few things that are related to top quark physics in general and the top quark mass measurement in particular, and that were bothering me for a while. I think those things are not discussed enough in the context of the top quark measurements. These things include: 1) Non-perturbative corrections to production cross sections and kinematic distributions as precision limiting factor for the determination of the top quark mass. 2) How does a finite life-time of the top quark impacts the non-perturbative corrections to top quark pair production ? 3) Top quark lifetimes are distributed exponentially; this means that there should be a few that live longer than the hadronization time. Are there mesons composed of the top quark and the light quark? How would one see them? Can one use those mesons to measure the top quark mass without an ambiguity? Tuesday, November 17, 15 Non-perturbative effects and the top quark mass Similar to the measurement of any observable at a hadron collider, extraction of the top quark mass is affected by non-perturbative effects. This is an issue that exists even if a short-distance mass definition for the top quark mass is chosen.
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusive $ Meson Production, the Parton Fusion Model and Strange Quark Structure Functions
    NI^EF NATIONAAL INSTITUUT VOOR KERNFYSICA EN HOGE ENERGIEFYSICA NIKHEF-H/86-3 Inclusive $ meson production, the parton fusion model and strange quark structure functions H. Dijkstra0. R. Bailey b\ E. Belau5). T. BöhringerJ), M. Bosman}). V. Chabaud5). C. Dameree, C. Dauml). C. de Rijkl). 5. Gill*0. A. Cillman6). R. Gilmore2*. 2. Hajduks\ C. Hardwickl), W. Hoogland1'. B.D. Hyams55, R. Klanner5). S. Kwan2). U. kotz5). G. Lütjens^, G. Lutz5'. J. Malos2). W. Marmer5*. E. Neugeoauer5), H. Palka*\ M. Pepé6), J. Richardson6'. K. Rybicki4). H.J. Seebrunner5). U. Stierlin5'. R.J. Tapper2). H.G. Tiecke1'. M. Turala4). G. Waltermann '. S. Watts6). P. Weilhammer3). F. Wickens6'. L.W. Wiqgers". A. Wylie5). and T. Zeludziewicz5) The ACCMOR Collaboration ABSTRACT The parton fusion model is used to describe the longitudinal differential cross section (do/dx..) of hadronic <p production. The doVdx,- for $ production in ^p.^pp and K p interactions is evaluated in the model by using structure functions for the constituents of the interacting particles. A comparison between the model and high statistics data in the Feynman * range 0.<xF(*)<0.4 allows the determination of the strange valence quark distribution in K mesons and the strange sea quark distribution in ii mesons, which appears to be harder than the light sea quark distribution. The comparison also shows that a significant part of inclusive $ production is due to the OZ1 allowed fusion of strange quarks, while the OZt inhibited fusion diagrams are strongly suppressed. To be submitted to Zeitschrift für Physik C 1) NIKHEF-H. Amsterdam. The Netherlands 2) University of Bristol, Bristol, UK 3) CERN.
    [Show full text]
  • Baryon Mass Splittings and Strong CP Violation in SU(3) Chiral Perturbation Theory
    LA-UR-15-23860, NT@WM-15-07, JLAB-THY-15-2061 Baryon mass splittings and strong CP violation in SU(3) Chiral Perturbation Theory J. de Vries ,1 E. Mereghetti,2 and A. Walker-Loud3, 4 1Institute for Advanced Simulation, Institut f¨urKernphysik, and J¨ulichCenter for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum J¨ulich,D-52425 J¨ulich,Germany 2Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA 3Department of Physics, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795, USA 4Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, 12000 Jefferson Avenue, Newport News, VA 23606, USA (Dated: May 9, 2017) Abstract We study SU(3) flavor-breaking corrections to the relation between the octet baryon masses and the nucleon-meson CP -violating interactions induced by the QCD θ¯ term. We work within the framework of SU(3) chiral perturbation theory and work through next-to-next-to-leading order in 2 the SU(3) chiral expansion, which is O(mq). At lowest order, the CP -odd couplings induced by the QCD θ¯ term are determined by mass splittings of the baryon octet, the classic result of Crewther et al. We show that for each isospin-invariant CP -violating nucleon-meson interaction there exists one relation which is respected by loop corrections up to the order we work, while other leading-order relations are violated. With these relations we extract a precise value of the pion-nucleon coupling g¯0 by using recent lattice QCD evaluations of the proton-neutron mass splitting. In addition, we derive semi-precise values for CP -violating coupling constants between heavier mesons and nucleons with ∼ 30% uncertainty and discuss their phenomenological impact on electric dipole moments of nucleons and nuclei.
    [Show full text]
  • Strong-Interaction Matter Under Extreme Conditions from Chiral Quark Models with Nonlocal Separable Interactions
    S S symmetry Review Strong-Interaction Matter under Extreme Conditions from Chiral Quark Models with Nonlocal Separable Interactions Daniel Gómez Dumm 1,*, Juan Pablo Carlomagno 1 and Norberto N. Scoccola 2,3 1 IFLP, CONICET-Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, C.C. 67, 1900 La Plata, Argentina; carlomagno@fisica.unlp.edu.ar 2 Physics Department, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Av. Libertador 8250, 1429 Buenos Aires, Argentina; [email protected] 3 CONICET, Rivadavia 1917, 1033 Buenos Aires, Argentina * Correspondence: dumm@fisica.unlp.edu.ar Abstract: We review the current status of the research on effective nonlocal NJL-like chiral quark models with separable interactions, focusing on the application of this approach to the description of the properties of hadronic and quark matter under extreme conditions. The analysis includes the predictions for various hadron properties in vacuum, as well as the study of the features of deconfinement and chiral restoration phase transitions for systems at finite temperature and/or density. We also address other related subjects, such as the study of phase transitions for imaginary chemical potentials, the possible existence of inhomogeneous phase regions, the presence of color superconductivity, the effects produced by strong external magnetic fields and the application to the description of compact stellar objects. Keywords: Nonlocal Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model; finite temperature and/or density; chiral phase transition; deconfinement transition Citation: Gómez Dumm, D.; Carlomagno, J.P.; Scoccola, N.N. Strong-Interaction Matter under 1. Introduction Extreme Conditions from Chiral The detailed understanding of the behavior of strong-interaction matter under extreme Quark Models with Nonlocal conditions of temperature and/or density has attracted great attention in the past decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle People Compile Data
    ,,-,-306--------NEWS AND VIEWS ____.:..c..:..:NA11J~RE___'_'_'VOL:c..:..:..c.309__=___24 M ___AY_I984 Particle people compile data The latest compilation ojparticle physics data is a monument not merely to those who discover new particles but also to those who have improved the accuracy oj what is known. THE complaint that there are simply too after less than a single decade. Among par­ breed. In retrospect, it is clear that the most many material particles for any of them to ticle physicists, it must be tempting to hope familiar mesons (the muon and pion) and justify the old adjective "fundamental" for a further order of magnitude in the the less massive of the two strange particles may seem, on the face of things, to be fully accuracy with which the mass of each par­ discovered in the late 1940s are made only borne out by the latest compilation of ticle is known with the passage of each of the three quarks called up, down and properties by the Particle Data Group, a decade. But this can only be a rule of strange. Charm was found at Stanford collaboration of 23 physicists which is an thumb; the estimated mass of the first University a decade ago, and bottom soon international outgrowth of the old strange meson (K), discovered more than afterwards, but top remains to be dis­ Berkeley Particle Data Group on which thirty years ago, is hardly more precise (at covered. responsibility for a critical review of one part in 50,000) than that of the JI1p, This latest compilation of particle data available data used to rest.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadron Reaction Mechanisms
    Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience Hadron reaction mechanisms This article has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text article. 1982 Rep. Prog. Phys. 45 335 (http://iopscience.iop.org/0034-4885/45/4/001) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 156.56.192.138 The article was downloaded on 08/05/2011 at 23:39 Please note that terms and conditions apply. Rep. Prog. Phys., Vol. 45, 1982. Printed in Great Britain Hadron reaction mechanisms P D B Collins and A D Martin Physics Department, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK Abstract The mechanisms of hadron scattering at high energies are reviewed in an introductory fashion, but from a modern standpoint in which we try to combine the ideas of the parton model and quantum chromodynamics (QCD) with Regge theory and phenomenology. After a brief introduction to QCD and the basic features of hadron scattering data, we discuss scaling and the dimensional counting rules, the parton structure of hadrons, and the parton model for large momentum transfer processes, including scaling violations. Hadronic jets and the use of parton ideas in soft scattering processes are examined, and we then turn our attention to Regge theory and its applications in exclusive and inclusive reactions, stressing the relationship to parton exchange. The mechanisms of hadron production which build up cross sections, and hence the underlying Regge singularities, and the possible overlap of Regge and scaling regions are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Look at Flavor
    Another Look at Flavor W. W. Buck1,2,3 and Stinson Lee2,4 1School of STEM, University of Washington, Bothell, Washingtion 98011, USA 2Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA 3Department of Physics, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virgina 23187, USA 4Department of Physics, CCAS, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia 20052, USA Tuesday, October 16, 2018 A new suggestion for organizing the charged pseudoscalar mesons is presented. The simple NR potential model employs a single value of the light quark mass and determines the potential coupling constant directly from the charged pseudoscalar mesons, Pion and Kaon, experimental radii values. All other constituent quark masses are directly dependent on the light quark mass value. The model compares features of the traditional approaches of the Non-relativistic(NR) quark model as well as that of a Relativistic quark model. We explore the possibility of introducing flavor as a dynamic quantum number. The discovery of QCD hadrons has revolutionized have, as usual, the same mass and designate them particle physics; and, has led researchers to better light quarks as is typical. And so the Pion is made understand the electro-weak-strong force. Organiz- up of two light quarks and is designated as unfla- ing mesons according to J PC has become, with great vored. The other mesons have two unequal mass benefit and success, the standard designation and quarks where one is a light quark. We designate these organizing tool of the Standard Model. It is also charge symmetric mesons, K+, D+, B+, and, even- very clear that the Non-relativistic (NR) quark model tually the T + (once confirmed), as the usual lowest has strong calculation strength that provides a good lying flavor mesons.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of the T and T ' Meson In
    129 OBSERVATION OF THE T AND T ' MESON IN ELECTRON POSITRON ANNIHILATIONS C.W. Darden, H. Hasemann, A. Krol zig, W. Schmidt-Parzefal l, H. Schroder, H.D. Schulz, F. Selonke, E. Steinmann , R. Wurth , Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg W. Hofmann , D. Wegener, Institut fLlr Physik, Uni versitat Dortmund H. Albrecht, K.R. Schubert, Insti tut fUr Hochenergiephysik der Universitat Hei delberg P. Bockmann, L. Jonsson Insti tute of Physics, Uni versity of Lund presented by W. Schmi dt-Parzefall Abstract : • The T and T ' have been observed using the DASP detector at the DORIS storage ring. A fi rst study of the decays of the T meson has been performed . Resume : Le et le T ' ont ete observes en uti l isant le detecteur DASP aupres de l'anneT au de stockage DORIS. Nous presentons des premieres etudes sur les desi ntegrations du meson T. 130 A Columbia-FNAL-Stony Brook col l aborati on in studying the reaction + - l) p + N + µ µ + X discovered peaks in the muon pair invariant mass distri bution near 10 GeV. They identified these peaks wi th three new mesons, which they called T(9.4), T' (10.0) and T"(l0.4) . Since the observed width was equal to the experimental resol ution, these new mesons were interpreted in analogy wi th the J/¢ mesons as a bound state bb of a new heavy quark b with a new flavour. + The best way to investigate such a state is its production in e e- annihilation. Thus can be found out whether it is real ly a state as narrow as expected for a bound bb system , and a detailed study of its decay properties can be perfonned .
    [Show full text]