DOCSLIB.ORG

Particle People Compile Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Particle People Compile Data ,,-,-306--------NEWS AND VIEWS ____.:..c..:..:NA11J~RE___'_'_'VOL:c..:..:..c.309__=___24 M ___AY_I984 Particle people compile data The latest compilation ojparticle physics data is a monument not merely to those who discover new particles but also to those who have improved the accuracy oj what is known. THE complaint that there are simply too after less than a single decade. Among par­ breed. In retrospect, it is clear that the most many material particles for any of them to ticle physicists, it must be tempting to hope familiar mesons (the muon and pion) and justify the old adjective "fundamental" for a further order of magnitude in the the less massive of the two strange particles may seem, on the face of things, to be fully accuracy with which the mass of each par­ discovered in the late 1940s are made only borne out by the latest compilation of ticle is known with the passage of each of the three quarks called up, down and properties by the Particle Data Group, a decade. But this can only be a rule of strange. Charm was found at Stanford collaboration of 23 physicists which is an thumb; the estimated mass of the first University a decade ago, and bottom soon international outgrowth of the old strange meson (K), discovered more than afterwards, but top remains to be dis­ Berkeley Particle Data Group on which thirty years ago, is hardly more precise (at covered. responsibility for a critical review of one part in 50,000) than that of the JI1p, This latest compilation of particle data available data used to rest. The new com­ just over a decade old and the first ex­ has surprisingly little experimental pilation, based on data which had become perimental proof that charmed quarks do evidence to report, all of it dating since available by the end of 1983, runs to 304 indeed exist. 1981. And much of this is entirely negative pages of the Reviews of Modern Physics In the circumstances, it is something of a - people have looked for particle reson­ for April this year (56, SI-S304; 1984) and surprise that while the mass of the neutron ances over a range of energies and have is likely to be many people's bible for years is known (as it should be after all this time) found nothing to suggest the existence of a to come. It is also a model of how data to better than one part in a million, the life­ top quark. But there is a handful of papers should be compiled in a fast-moving field. time of this particle against radioactive that appear to conclude that something The moral seems to be that the job is best decay (into a proton, a negative electron happens at an energy of about 34 GeV done by people who are themselves prac­ and an antineutrino) is known only to which could be the signature of the species titioners. within 2 per cent or thereabouts. called toponium, a particle built from the In reality, the compilers have had to This is not, of course, the scandal that it top quark and its antiquark. If that is the break with the traditions of their pre­ may seem to be. The experimental dif­ case, the proton-antiproton collider at decessors and now explain that they can no ficulties of anything like a direct measure­ CERN should find top any day now. Some longer include references to all relevant ment of a decay whose products are among would say that the missing quark should publications in high-energy physics bearing the most common particles in the real have been found already. on the properties of particles. The liter­ world, and - worse still - themselves Even in this dry listing, the search for ature, they say, is growing by about 10 per stable, are bound to be formidable. But the free quarks is more fun - but equally fruit­ cent a year, with the result that archival practical importance of knowing the decay less. In a listing of more than 250 experi­ material must rest where it lies, in previous rate of neutrons is far from negligible even mental searches (each of which is solemnly compilations, the most recent of which was in such straightforward circumstances as accompanied by a number giving the two years ago. Laconically, however, the the production of bursts of cosmic rays number of "quark events" recorded), all new list of particles includes (under' 'stable from the Sun. but a few of the corresponding entries con­ particles", if you please) the measured On the lifetime of the proton, the new sist simply of the digit "0". The experi­ values of the masses of the Wand Z par­ compilation of particle data is also ments cover both searches for free quarks ticlesfirst discovered just over a year ago at necessarily unhelpful. The authors can in accelerator experiments and those, CERN, the European high-energy physics only quote the steadily lengthening list of based on the assumption that free quarks laboratory. largely negative searches for evidence that could be relatively massive and stable par­ The classification of these particles protons do indeed decay, as the grand ticles, in which people have sought to find (along with the photon) as stable is :1ot as unified theories uniting electromagnetic, quarks by taking vacuum cleaners to the eccentric as it may seem. The criterion is weak and strong forces suggest they ground beneath electrified security fences. that particles whose decay is accomplished should, into, say, electrons and photons. The commentary in the compilation says only by the intervention of weak nuclear As is well-known, the lower limits on the that "of the several candidate cosmic ray forces are counted as being stable. By the lifetime determined experimentally are events, one still enjoys the active advocacy same test, a whole string of unstable already less than the lifetime calculated by of its discoverer" . mesons and baryons are thrown together in the simplest of the theories, according to Other particles have been sought and not the same group. this compilation by "at least one order of found in great profusion. On the evidence To outsiders, perhaps the most sur­ magnitude". Given that the first experi­ of this listing, the magnetic monopole does prising feature of these listings is the com­ mental data appeared only in 1981, and not exist. From the exotic zoo of particles parative speed with which it seems to have that nearly a score of substantial papers on such as the Higgs boson (which should exist been possible to refine the accuracy of the the subject have since appeared, it cannot if only people knew where to look) and the masses of recently-discovered particles. be much more than a year before the decay tachyon (which entails time-reversal), the Thus, among the group of three known of the proton is observed, or the theories axion is singled out for special attention in leptons (electrons, /.I-mesons and T­ put in considerable difficulty. this compilation, no doubt because of the mesons, each with negative or positive Another of the still-frujtless searches recent popularity of these still unknown electric charge), the masses of the first two reported in the compilation is that for the particles as plausible constituents of the are understandably known to within one sixth quark, labelled top. By now, it seems missing mass in the Universe. But here part in a million (after eight and four thoroughly established that the particles again, for the time being at least, the decades respectively), but even that of the called mesons consist simply of a quark and experimentalists have drawn a blank. T-meson is known to within 2 parts in 1,000 an antiquark, not necessarily of the same John Maddox © 1984 Nature Publishing Group.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CERN Courier–Digital Edition
    CERNMarch/April 2021 cerncourier.com COURIERReporting on international high-energy physics WELCOME CERN Courier – digital edition Welcome to the digital edition of the March/April 2021 issue of CERN Courier. Hadron colliders have contributed to a golden era of discovery in high-energy physics, hosting experiments that have enabled physicists to unearth the cornerstones of the Standard Model. This success story began 50 years ago with CERN’s Intersecting Storage Rings (featured on the cover of this issue) and culminated in the Large Hadron Collider (p38) – which has spawned thousands of papers in its first 10 years of operations alone (p47). It also bodes well for a potential future circular collider at CERN operating at a centre-of-mass energy of at least 100 TeV, a feasibility study for which is now in full swing. Even hadron colliders have their limits, however. To explore possible new physics at the highest energy scales, physicists are mounting a series of experiments to search for very weakly interacting “slim” particles that arise from extensions in the Standard Model (p25). Also celebrating a golden anniversary this year is the Institute for Nuclear Research in Moscow (p33), while, elsewhere in this issue: quantum sensors HADRON COLLIDERS target gravitational waves (p10); X-rays go behind the scenes of supernova 50 years of discovery 1987A (p12); a high-performance computing collaboration forms to handle the big-physics data onslaught (p22); Steven Weinberg talks about his latest work (p51); and much more. To sign up to the new-issue alert, please visit: http://comms.iop.org/k/iop/cerncourier To subscribe to the magazine, please visit: https://cerncourier.com/p/about-cern-courier EDITOR: MATTHEW CHALMERS, CERN DIGITAL EDITION CREATED BY IOP PUBLISHING ATLAS spots rare Higgs decay Weinberg on effective field theory Hunting for WISPs CCMarApr21_Cover_v1.indd 1 12/02/2021 09:24 CERNCOURIER www.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Monopole Searches See the Related Review(S): Magnetic Monopoles
    Citation: P.A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020) Magnetic Monopole Searches See the related review(s): Magnetic Monopoles Monopole Production Cross Section — Accelerator Searches X-SECT MASS CHG ENERGY (cm2) (GeV) (g) (GeV) BEAM DOCUMENT ID TECN <2.5E−37 200–6000 1 13000 pp 1 ACHARYA 17 INDU <2E−37 200–6000 2 13000 pp 1 ACHARYA 17 INDU <4E−37 200–5000 3 13000 pp 1 ACHARYA 17 INDU <1.5E−36 400–4000 4 13000 pp 1 ACHARYA 17 INDU <7E−36 1000–3000 5 13000 pp 1 ACHARYA 17 INDU <5E−40 200–2500 0.5–2.0 8000 pp 2 AAD 16AB ATLS <2E−37 100–3500 1 8000 pp 3 ACHARYA 16 INDU <2E−37 100–3500 2 8000 pp 3 ACHARYA 16 INDU <6E−37 500–3000 3 8000 pp 3 ACHARYA 16 INDU <7E−36 1000–2000 4 8000 pp 3 ACHARYA 16 INDU <1.6E−38 200–1200 1 7000 pp 4 AAD 12CS ATLS <5E−38 45–102 1 206 e+ e− 5 ABBIENDI 08 OPAL <0.2E−36 200–700 1 1960 p p 6 ABULENCIA 06K CNTR < 2.E−36 1 300 e+ p 7,8 AKTAS 05A INDU < 0.2 E−36 2 300 e+ p 7,8 AKTAS 05A INDU < 0.09E−36 3 300 e+ p 7,8 AKTAS 05A INDU < 0.05E−36 ≥ 6 300 e+ p 7,8 AKTAS 05A INDU < 2.E−36 1 300 e+ p 7,9 AKTAS 05A INDU < 0.2E−36 2 300 e+ p 7,9 AKTAS 05A INDU < 0.07E−36 3 300 e+ p 7,9 AKTAS 05A INDU < 0.06E−36 ≥ 6 300 e+ p 7,9 AKTAS 05A INDU < 0.6E−36 >265 1 1800 p p 10 KALBFLEISCH 04 INDU < 0.2E−36 >355 2 1800 p p 10 KALBFLEISCH 04 INDU < 0.07E−36 >410 3 1800 p p 10 KALBFLEISCH 04 INDU < 0.2E−36 >375 6 1800 p p 10 KALBFLEISCH 04 INDU < 0.7E−36 >295 1 1800 p p 11,12 KALBFLEISCH 00 INDU < 7.8E−36 >260 2 1800 p p 11,12 KALBFLEISCH 00 INDU < 2.3E−36 >325 3 1800 p p 11,13 KALBFLEISCH 00 INDU < 0.11E−36 >420 6 1800 p p 11,13 KALBFLEISCH 00 INDU <0.65E−33 <3.3 ≥ 2 11A 197Au 14,15 HE 97 <1.90E−33 <8.1 ≥ 2 160A 208Pb 14,15 HE 97 <3.E−37 <45.0 1.0 88–94 e+ e− PINFOLD 93 PLAS <3.E−37 <41.6 2.0 88–94 e+ e− PINFOLD 93 PLAS <7.E−35 <44.9 0.2–1.0 89–93 e+ e− KINOSHITA 92 PLAS <2.E−34 <850 ≥ 0.5 1800 p p BERTANI 90 PLAS <1.2E−33 <800 ≥ 1 1800 p p PRICE 90 PLAS <1.E−37 <29 1 50–61 e+ e− KINOSHITA 89 PLAS <1.E−37 <18 2 50–61 e+ e− KINOSHITA 89 PLAS <1.E−38 <17 <1 35 e+ e− BRAUNSCH..
    [Show full text]
  • The Moedal Experiment at the LHC. Searching Beyond the Standard
    126 EPJ Web of Conferences , 02024 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201612602024 ICNFP 2015 The MoEDAL experiment at the LHC Searching beyond the standard model James L. Pinfold (for the MoEDAL Collaboration)1,a 1 University of Alberta, Physics Department, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 0V1, Canada Abstract. MoEDAL is a pioneering experiment designed to search for highly ionizing avatars of new physics such as magnetic monopoles or massive (pseudo-)stable charged particles. Its groundbreaking physics program defines a number of scenarios that yield potentially revolutionary insights into such foundational questions as: are there extra dimensions or new symmetries; what is the mechanism for the generation of mass; does magnetic charge exist; what is the nature of dark matter; and, how did the big-bang develop. MoEDAL’s purpose is to meet such far-reaching challenges at the frontier of the field. The innovative MoEDAL detector employs unconventional methodologies tuned to the prospect of discovery physics. The largely passive MoEDAL detector, deployed at Point 8 on the LHC ring, has a dual nature. First, it acts like a giant camera, comprised of nuclear track detectors - analyzed offline by ultra fast scanning microscopes - sensitive only to new physics. Second, it is uniquely able to trap the particle messengers of physics beyond the Standard Model for further study. MoEDAL’s radiation environment is monitored by a state-of-the-art real-time TimePix pixel detector array. A new MoEDAL sub-detector to extend MoEDAL’s reach to millicharged, minimally ionizing, particles (MMIPs) is under study Finally we shall describe the next step for MoEDAL called Cosmic MoEDAL, where we define a very large high altitude array to take the search for highly ionizing avatars of new physics to higher masses that are available from the cosmos.
    [Show full text]
  • Axions and Other Similar Particles
    1 91. Axions and Other Similar Particles 91. Axions and Other Similar Particles Revised October 2019 by A. Ringwald (DESY, Hamburg), L.J. Rosenberg (U. Washington) and G. Rybka (U. Washington). 91.1 Introduction In this section, we list coupling-strength and mass limits for light neutral scalar or pseudoscalar bosons that couple weakly to normal matter and radiation. Such bosons may arise from the spon- taneous breaking of a global U(1) symmetry, resulting in a massless Nambu-Goldstone (NG) boson. If there is a small explicit symmetry breaking, either already in the Lagrangian or due to quantum effects such as anomalies, the boson acquires a mass and is called a pseudo-NG boson. Typical examples are axions (A0)[1–4] and majorons [5], associated, respectively, with a spontaneously broken Peccei-Quinn and lepton-number symmetry. A common feature of these light bosons φ is that their coupling to Standard-Model particles is suppressed by the energy scale that characterizes the symmetry breaking, i.e., the decay constant f. The interaction Lagrangian is −1 µ L = f J ∂µ φ , (91.1) where J µ is the Noether current of the spontaneously broken global symmetry. If f is very large, these new particles interact very weakly. Detecting them would provide a window to physics far beyond what can be probed at accelerators. Axions are of particular interest because the Peccei-Quinn (PQ) mechanism remains perhaps the most credible scheme to preserve CP-symmetry in QCD. Moreover, the cold dark matter (CDM) of the universe may well consist of axions and they are searched for in dedicated experiments with a realistic chance of discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerator Search of the Magnetic Monopo
    Accelerator Based Magnetic Monopole Search Experiments (Overview) Vasily Dzhordzhadze, Praveen Chaudhari∗, Peter Cameron, Nicholas D’Imperio, Veljko Radeka, Pavel Rehak, Margareta Rehak, Sergio Rescia, Yannis Semertzidis, John Sondericker, and Peter Thieberger. Brookhaven National Laboratory ABSTRACT We present an overview of accelerator-based searches for magnetic monopoles and we show why such searches are important for modern particle physics. Possible properties of monopoles are reviewed as well as experimental methods used in the search for them at accelerators. Two types of experimental methods, direct and indirect are discussed. Finally, we describe proposed magnetic monopole search experiments at RHIC and LHC. Content 1. Magnetic Monopole characteristics 2. Experimental techniques 3. Monopole Search experiments 4. Magnetic Monopoles in virtual processes 5. Future experiments 6. Summary 1. Magnetic Monopole characteristics The magnetic monopole puzzle remains one of the fundamental and unsolved problems in physics. This problem has a along history. The military engineer Pierre de Maricourt [1] in1269 was breaking magnets, trying to separate their poles. P. Curie assumed the existence of single magnetic poles [2]. A real breakthrough happened after P. Dirac’s approach to the solution of the electron charge quantization problem [3]. Before Dirac, J. Maxwell postulated his fundamental laws of electrodynamics [4], which represent a complete description of all known classical electromagnetic phenomena. Together with the Lorenz force law and the Newton equations of motion, they describe all the classical dynamics of interacting charged particles and electromagnetic fields. In analogy to electrostatics one can add a magnetic charge, by introducing a magnetic charge density, thus magnetic fields are no longer due solely to the motion of an electric charge and in Maxwell equation a magnetic current will appear in analogy to the electric current.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Monopoles
    Magnetic Monopoles Since Maxwell discovered the unified theory, Maxwell equations, of electric and magnetic forces, people have studied its implications. Maxwell conjectured the electromagnetic wave in his equations to be the light, based on the speed of electromagnetic wave being close to the speed of light. Since Herz and Heaviside, independently, have written the current form of Maxwell’s equations, 1905 Poincare and Einstein independently found the Lorentz transformation which is the property of Maxwell equation. The study of cathode ray has led to the discovery of electrons. The electron orbits are bending around when a magnet was brought near it. By imagining the motion of electron near a tip of a very long solenoid, Poincare introduced a magnetic monopole around which the magnetic field comes out radially. B = gr/r3 1. Consider the motion of a charged particle with equation of motion, m d2r/dt2 = e v x B Find the conserved energy E and the explicit form of the conserved angular momentum J=mr x dr/dt+.… 2. Find the orbit of the charged particle. 3. Consider the motion of two magnetic monopoles appearing in the 4-dim field theory. Magnetic monopoles are characterized by their positions and internal phase angle. The Lagrangian for the relative position r and phase ψ is given as below. where ψ ~ ψ+2π and ∇xw(r)= -r/r3 , and r0 and a are constant positive parameters.. µ r r 1 1 a2 L = 1+ 0 r˙ 2 + r2 1+ 0 − (ψ˙ + w(r) r˙)2 + 0 2 r0 2 r r · 2µr0 1+ r Calling the conserved charge q under the shift symmetry of ψ and the conjugate momentum π of the coordinate r, find the expression for the conserved energy and angular momentum J.
    [Show full text]
  • Axions –Theory SLAC Summer Institute 2007
    Axions –Theory SLAC Summer Institute 2007 Helen Quinn Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Axions –Theory – p. 1/?? Lectures from an Axion Workshop Strong CP Problem and Axions Roberto Peccei hep-ph/0607268 Astrophysical Axion Bounds Georg Raffelt hep-ph/0611350 Axion Cosmology Pierre Sikivie astro-ph/0610440 Axions –Theory – p. 2/?? Symmetries Symmetry ⇔ Invariance of Lagrangian Familiar cases: Lorentz symmetries ⇔ Invariance under changes of coordinates Other symmetries: Invariances under field redefinitions e.g (local) gauge invariance in electromagnetism: Aµ(x) → Aµ(x)+ δµΩ(x) Fµν = δµAν − δνAµ → Fµν Axions –Theory – p. 3/?? How to build an (effective) Lagrangian Choose symmetries to impose on L: gauge, global and discrete. Choose representation content of matter fields Write down every (renormalizable) term allowed by the symmetries with arbitrary couplings (d ≤ 4) Add Hermitian conjugate (unitarity) - Fix renormalized coupling constants from match to data (subtractions, usually defined perturbatively) "Naturalness" - an artificial criterion to avoid arbitrarily "fine tuned" couplings Axions –Theory – p. 4/?? Symmetries of Standard Model Gauge Symmetries Strong interactions: SU(3)color unbroken but confined; quarks in triplets Electroweak SU(2)weak X U(1)Y more later:representations, "spontaneous breaking" Discrete Symmetries CPT –any field theory (local, Hermitian L); C and P but not CP broken by weak couplings CP (and thus T) breaking - to be explored below - arises from quark-Higgs couplings Global symmetries U(1)B−L accidental; more? Axions –Theory – p. 5/?? Chiral symmetry Massless four component Dirac fermion is two independent chiral fermions (1+γ5) (1−γ5) ψ = 2 ψ + 2 ψ = ψR + ψL γ5 ≡ γ0γ1γ2γ3 γ5γµ = −γµγ5 Chiral Rotations: rotate L and R independently ψ → ei(α+βγ5)ψ i(α+β) i(α−β) ψR → e ψR; ψL → e ψL Kinetic and gauge coupling terms in L are chirally invariant † ψγ¯ µψ = ψ¯RγµψR + ψ¯LγµψL since ψ¯ = ψ γ0 Axions –Theory – p.
    [Show full text]
  • Axions & Wisps
    FACULTY OF SCIENCE AXIONS & WISPS STEPHEN PARKER 2nd Joint CoEPP-CAASTRO Workshop September 28 – 30, 2014 Great Western, Victoria 2 Talk Outline • Frequency & Quantum Metrology Group at UWA • Basic background / theory for axions and hidden sector photons • Photon-based experimental searches + bounds • Focus on resonant cavity “Haloscope” experiments for CDM axions • Work at UWA: Past, Present, Future A Few Useful Review Articles: J.E. Kim & G. Carosi, Axions and the strong CP problem, Rev. Mod. Phys., 82(1), 557 – 601, 2010. M. Kuster et al. (Eds.), Axions: Theory, Cosmology, and Experimental Searches, Lect. Notes Phys. 741 (Springer), 2008. P. Arias et al., WISPy Cold Dark Matter, arXiv:1201.5902, 2012. [email protected] The University of Western Australia 3 Frequency & Quantum Metrology Research Group ~ 3 staff, 6 postdocs, 8 students Hosts node of ARC CoE EQuS Many areas of research from fundamental to applied: Cryogenic Sapphire Oscillator Tests of Lorentz Symmetry & fundamental constants Ytterbium Lattice Clock for ACES mission Material characterization Frequency sources, synthesis, measurement Low noise microwaves + millimetrewaves …and lab based searches for WISPs! Core WISP team: Stephen Parker, Ben McAllister, Eugene Ivanov, Mike Tobar [email protected] The University of Western Australia 4 Axions, ALPs and WISPs Weakly Interacting Slim Particles Axion Like Particles Slim = sub-eV Origins in particle physics (see: strong CP problem, extensions to Standard Model) but become pretty handy elsewhere WISPs Can be formulated as: Dark Matter (i.e. Axions, hidden photons) ALPs Dark Energy (i.e. Chameleons) Low energy scale dictates experimental approach Axions WISP searches are complementary to WIMP searches [email protected] The University of Western Australia 5 The Axion – Origins in Particle Physics CP violating term in QCD Lagrangian implies neutron electric dipole moment: But measurements place constraint: Why is the neutron electric dipole moment (and thus θ) so small? This is the Strong CP Problem.
    [Show full text]
  • 117. Magnetic Monopoles
    1 117. Magnetic Monopoles 117. Magnetic Monopoles Revised August 2019 by D. Milstead (Stockholm U.) and E.J. Weinberg (Columbia U.). 117.1 Theory of magnetic monopoles The symmetry between electric and magnetic fields in the source-free Maxwell’s equations naturally suggests that electric charges might have magnetic counterparts, known as magnetic monopoles. Although the greatest interest has been in the supermassive monopoles that are a firm prediction of all grand unified theories, one cannot exclude the possibility of lighter monopoles. In either case, the magnetic charge is constrained by a quantization condition first found by Dirac [1]. Consider a monopole with magnetic charge QM and a Coulomb magnetic field Q ˆr B = M . (117.1) 4π r2 Any vector potential A whose curl is equal to B must be singular along some line running from the origin to spatial infinity. This Dirac string singularity could potentially be detected through the extra phase that the wavefunction of a particle with electric charge QE would acquire if it moved along a loop encircling the string. For the string to be unobservable, this phase must be a multiple of 2π. Requiring that this be the case for any pair of electric and magnetic charges gives min min the condition that all charges be integer multiples of minimum charges QE and QM obeying min min QE QM = 2π . (117.2) (For monopoles which also carry an electric charge, called dyons [2], the quantization conditions on their electric charges can be modified. However, the constraints on magnetic charges, as well as those on all purely electric particles, will be unchanged.) Another way to understand this result is to note that the conserved orbital angular momentum of a point electric charge moving in the field of a magnetic monopole has an additional component, with L = mr × v − 4πQEQM ˆr (117.3) Requiring the radial component of L to be quantized in half-integer units yields Eq.
    [Show full text]
  • Strange Particle Theory in the Cosmic Ray Period R
    STRANGE PARTICLE THEORY IN THE COSMIC RAY PERIOD R. Dalitz To cite this version: R. Dalitz. STRANGE PARTICLE THEORY IN THE COSMIC RAY PERIOD. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1982, 43 (C8), pp.C8-195-C8-205. 10.1051/jphyscol:1982811. jpa-00222371 HAL Id: jpa-00222371 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00222371 Submitted on 1 Jan 1982 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE Colloque C8, suppldment au no 12, Tome 43, ddcembre 1982 page ~8-195 STRANGE PARTICLE THEORY IN THE COSMIC RAY PERIOD R.H. Dalitz Department of Theoretical Physics, 2 KebZe Road, Oxford OX1 3NP, U.K. What role did theoretical physicists play concerning elementary particle physics in the cosmic ray period? The short answer is that it was the nuclear forces which were the central topic of their attention at that time. These were considered to be due primarily to the exchange of pions between nucleons, and the study of all aspects of the pion-nucleon interactions was the most direct contribution they could make to this problem. Of course, this was indeed a most important topic, and much significant understanding of the pion-nucleon interaction resulted from these studies, although the precise nature of the nucleonnucleon force is not settled even to this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for a New 17 Mev Boson
    PROTOPHOBIC 8Be TRANSITION EVIDENCE FOR A NEW 17 MEV BOSON Flip Tanedo arXiv:1604.07411 & work in progress SLAC Dark Sectors 2016 (28 — 30 April) with Jonathan Feng, Bart Fornal, Susan Gardner, Iftah Galon, Jordan Smolinsky, & Tim Tait BART SUSAN IFTAH 1 flip . tanedo @ uci . edu EVIDENCE FOR A 17 MEV NEW BOSON 14 week ending A 6.8σ nuclear transitionPRL 116, 042501 (2016) anomalyPHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 29 JANUARY 2016 shape of the resonance [40], but it is definitelyweek different ending pairs (rescaled for better separation) compared with the PRL 116, 042501 (2016) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 29 JANUARY 2016 from the shape of the forward or backward asymmetry [40]. simulations (full curve) including only M1 and E1 con- Therefore, the above experimental data make the interpre- tributions. The experimental data do not deviate from the Observation of Anomalous Internal Pairtation Creation of the in observed8Be: A Possible anomaly Indication less probable of a as Light, being the normal IPC. This fact supports also the assumption of the Neutralconsequence Boson of some kind of interference effects. boson decay. The deviation cannot be explained by any γ-ray related The χ2 analysis mentioned above to judge the signifi- A. J. Krasznahorkay,* M. Csatlós, L. Csige, Z. Gácsi,background J. Gulyás, M. either, Hunyadi, since I. Kuti, we B. cannot M. Nyakó, see any L. Stuhl, effect J. Timár, at off cance of the observed anomaly was extended to extract the T. G. Tornyi,resonance, and Zs. where Vajta the γ-ray background is almost the same. mass of the hypothetical boson. The simulated angular Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy ofTo Sciences the best (MTA of Atomki), our knowledge, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard Model and Beyond Maxim Perelstein, LEPP/Cornell U
    The Standard Model and Beyond Maxim Perelstein, LEPP/Cornell U. NYSS APS/AAPT Conference, April 19, 2008 The basic question of particle physics: What is the world made of? What is the smallest indivisible building block of matter? Is there such a thing? In the 20th century, we made tremendous progress in observing smaller and smaller objects Today’s accelerators allow us to study matter on length scales as short as 10^(-18) m The world’s largest particle accelerator/collider: the Tevatron (located at Fermilab in suburban Chicago) 4 miles long, accelerates protons and antiprotons to 99.9999% of speed of light and collides them head-on, 2 The CDF million collisions/sec. detector The control room Particle Collider is a Giant Microscope! • Optics: diffraction limit, ∆min ≈ λ • Quantum mechanics: particles waves, λ ≈ h¯/p • Higher energies shorter distances: ∆ ∼ 10−13 cm M c2 ∼ 1 GeV • Nucleus: proton mass p • Colliders today: E ∼ 100 GeV ∆ ∼ 10−16 cm • Colliders in near future: E ∼ 1000 GeV ∼ 1 TeV ∆ ∼ 10−17 cm Particle Colliders Can Create New Particles! • All naturally occuring matter consists of particles of just a few types: protons, neutrons, electrons, photons, neutrinos • Most other known particles are highly unstable (lifetimes << 1 sec) do not occur naturally In Special Relativity, energy and momentum are conserved, • 2 but mass is not: energy-mass transfer is possible! E = mc • So, a collision of 2 protons moving relativistically can result in production of particles that are much heavier than the protons, “made out of” their kinetic
    [Show full text]