Self-Characterization in Flavian Rome

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Self-Characterization in Flavian Rome University of Groningen Flavius Josephus' Self-Characterization in First-Century Rome Glas, Eelco DOI: 10.33612/diss.135980205 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2020 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Glas, E. (2020). Flavius Josephus' Self-Characterization in First-Century Rome: A Literary Analysis of the Autobiographical Passages in the Bellum Judaicum. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.135980205 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 24-09-2021 Flavius Josephus’ Self-Characterization in First-Century Rome A Literary Analysis of the Autobiographical Passages in the Bellum Judaicum PhD thesis to obtain the degree of PhD at the University of Groningen on the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. C. Wijmenga and in accordance with the decision by the College of Deans. This thesis will be defended in public on Monday 2 November 2020 at 11.00 hours by Jacob Evert Glas born on 20 September 1991 in Groningen ii Supervisors Prof. dr. S.N. Mason Prof. dr. F.L. Roig Lanzillotta Assessment Committee Prof. dr. H.H. Chapman Prof. dr. J.W. Van Henten Prof. dr. J.T.A.G.M. Van Ruiten iii Printing house: GVO drukkers & vormgevers B.V. Cover illustration: Miniature in the French translation of the Bellum Judaicum by Guillaume Coquillard made in 1460–63 (Chantilly, Musée Condé, Ms. fr. 1061, fol. 151; plate: J. Meurgey, Les principaux manuscrits à peintures du Musée Condé à Chantilly. Paris: La Société française de reproductions de manuscrits à peintures, 1930: pl. lxxxiv). iv Contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................................... vii Preface and Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................. viii Conventions and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ x Chapter 1: Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 “There’s no Such Thing as Bad Publicity” ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Foundation of this Study ................................................................................................................ 4 1.2.1 Developments in Josephus Scholarship and the Approach of the Present Study ......... 4 1.2.2 The Sources of the BJ ..................................................................................................................... 11 1.2.3 The Date of the BJ .......................................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Josephus’ Autobiographical Material: State-of-the-Question..................................................... 14 1.4 Josephus in Flavian Rome: Reading the BJ Comparatively ......................................................... 27 1.5 On Character and Self-Characterization ......................................................................................... 30 1.6 Scope and Outline of the Present Study ........................................................................................... 33 Chapter 2: The Moral and Rhetorical Backgrounds of Character in the BJ ........................................ 37 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 37 2.2 The Historical Context of Josephus’ BJ............................................................................................. 38 2.3 Historiography in Josephus’ Rome .................................................................................................... 43 2.3.1 Rhetoric and Character in Graeco-Roman Historiography .............................................. 45 2.3.2 Moral Didacticism and Roman Imperial Historiography .................................................. 48 2.4 Exemplarity and Didacticism in Josephus’ Corpus ....................................................................... 55 2.4.1 Josephus’ Historical Writings: Some General Observations .............................................. 55 2.4.2 Moral Character in the BJ ........................................................................................................... 59 2.4.3 Rhetoric and the Presentation of Character in the BJ ........................................................ 65 2.5 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................. 83 Chapter 3: The Moralizing Themes of Josephus’ Self-Characterization in the BJ ............................ 85 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 85 3.2 Josephus as a Historian in Flavian Rome and the Aims of the BJ ............................................. 88 v 3.3 The Composition of Josephus’ Self-Characterization .................................................................. 95 3.3.1 Josephus’ Self-Characterization: Outline and Compositional Framing ........................ 95 3.3.2 Josephus as a Political and Military Leader .......................................................................... 101 3.3.3 Civil War, Purity, and Pollution in the BJ (2.569–646) ...................................................... 120 3.3.4 The Tragic Tone of Josephus’ Self-Characterization (BJ 3.135–442) ............................... 128 3.3.5 The Functions of Josephus’ Speech before the Walls of Jerusalem (BJ 5.361–419) ..... 138 3.4 Conclusion: The Purpose of Josephus’ Self-Characterisation in the BJ .................................. 142 Chapter 4: Graeco-Roman Autobiographical Discourse and the Rhetoric of Self-Praise ............. 145 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 145 4.2 Josephus and Autobiographical Practice in Flavian Rome ....................................................... 147 4.2.1 Autobiography in Antiquity ..................................................................................................... 147 4.2.2 Classical Greece ........................................................................................................................... 148 4.2.3 Autobiography in the Hellenistic and Roman Republic Period ..................................... 150 4.2.4 The Roman Empire ..................................................................................................................... 153 4.2.5 Josephus’ Autobiographical Practice in a Roman Imperial Context ............................. 155 4.3 Greeks and Romans on the Problem of Self-Praise ..................................................................... 156 4.3.1 Classical Greece ........................................................................................................................... 157 4.3.2 Greek and non-Greek Provincials under Rome .................................................................. 160 4.3.3 Romans and Self-Praise .............................................................................................................. 179 4.4 Josephus and the Decorum of Self-Praise ...................................................................................... 192 Chapter 5: The Rhetorical Features of Josephus’ Self-Characterization in the BJ .......................... 196 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 196 5.2 Person and Perspective in the BJ: Comparative Observations ................................................. 199 5.3 The Art of Moderating Self-Praise in the BJ .................................................................................. 209 5.3.1 Other Characters Praising Josephus ....................................................................................... 210 5.3.2 Josephus’ Praising His Own Virtues: Exceptions ................................................................. 213 5.3.3 Josephus’ Words and Actions ................................................................................................... 215 5.3.4 Josephus’ Praise of Other Characters ....................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Rituals of Triumph in the Mediterranean World Culture and History of the Ancient Near East
    Rituals of Triumph in the Mediterranean World Culture and History of the Ancient Near East Founding Editor M.H.E. Weippert Editor-in-Chief Thomas Schneider Editors Eckart Frahm W. Randall Garr B. Halpern Theo P.J. van den Hout Irene J. Winter VOLUME 63 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/chan Presentation Scene—Seti I Karnak War Relief (Exterior Northern Wall of Hypostyle Hall; East Side) Photograph Courtesy of Prof. Peter Brand. Rituals of Triumph in the Mediterranean World Edited by Anthony Spalinger and Jeremy Armstrong LEIDEN • BOSTON 2013 Cover illustration: Details from a relief sculpture from Praeneste (Palestrina) showing the triumph of Trajan. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rituals of triumph in the Mediterranean world / edited by Anthony Spalinger and Jeremy Armstrong. pages cm. — (Culture and history of the ancient Near East, ISSN 1566-2055 ; volume 63) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-25100-7 (hardback : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-90-04-25117-5 (e-book) 1. Mediterranean Region—History, Military—To 1500. 2. Triumph. 3. Rituals—Mediterranean Region—History—To 1500. 4. Rites and ceremonies—Mediterranean Region—History—To 1500. 5. Processions—Mediterranean Region—History—To 1500. I. Spalinger, Anthony John author, edi- tor of compilation. II. Armstrong, Jeremy, author, editor of compilation. DE84.R57 2013 394.2—dc23 2013009549 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface.
    [Show full text]
  • Hellenisering En Hersyrisering Van Syrië in De Romeinse Tijd
    Hellenisering en hersyrisering van Syrië in de Romeinse tijd door Jan M.F. VAN R EETH Aan de gedachtenis van Richard Laqueur "Gegenüber den rational bedingt en (. .) übernationalen Herrschaftsformen des Absolutismus stellen die Völker ausge­ prägtere lndividualitäten dar, bei denen (. .) die irrationalen Elemente über• wiegen" • "Das war seine grol3e unsterbliche Tat, das Werk der schönsten Individualität, wie er der schönste individuelle Held war. Er hat bewirkt, dal3 sich die griechische Welt auf ganz Asien verbreitete." Zo karakteriseert Hegel het werk van Alexander de Grote - "indem er ( ... ) das von ihm besetzte Asien gleichsam zu einem hellenischen Lande umstempelte." 1 Zonder het te weten, heeft Hegel hiermee een nieuw tijdperk voor de geschiedschrijving ontsloten, want vóór hem bestond het hel­ lenisme niet. Het is een schepping van de door Hegel beïnvloede Citaat uit "Das deutsche Reich von 187 1 in weltgeschichtlicher Beleuchtung", in : Recht und Staat in Geschichte und Gegenwart 88, Tübingen 1932, pp. 10 sq. Geschreven enkele maanden vóór de machtsovername door Hitler, kan men dit schitterend essay werkelijk profetisch noemen. Reeds als student kwam ik onder de indruk van de zeer persoonlijke geschi edkundige en politieke ideeën van deze grote filoloog, wiens lot als vluchteling uit Duitsland in de U.S.A. tragisch mag worden genoemd (cf. J. Vogt, Historische Zeitschrifi 197, 1963, pp. 789 sq.; H.G. Gunde!, Richard Laqueur, in: id. (ed.), Giej3ener Ge/ehrte in der ersten Hälfte des 20. Jahrhunderts (Lebensbilder aus Hessen 2), Marburg 1982, pp. 595 sq., 600). Zijn studies over Fla vius Josephus en Eusebius, waarin hij vanuit de vorm van de tekst wil komen tot een "Gesamtverständnis des Hi storikers" (aldus zeer mooi omschreven door H.
    [Show full text]
  • Luther After 1517 168
    Durham E-Theses Melanchthon's Authorizing of Luther: An Examination of the Narrative Origins of Sixteenth-Century Historical Life-Writing. ALDERSON, MICHAEL,PETER How to cite: ALDERSON, MICHAEL,PETER (2014) Melanchthon's Authorizing of Luther: An Examination of the Narrative Origins of Sixteenth-Century Historical Life-Writing., Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10572/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Melanchthon’s Authorizing of Luther: An Examination of the Narrative Origins of Sixteenth-Century Historical Life-writing. 1 Volume Michael Peter Alderson Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of German School of Modern Languages and Cultures University of Durham 2013 Michael Peter Alderson Melanchthon’s Authorizing of Luther: An Examination of the Narrative Origins of Sixteenth-Century Historical Life-Writing. For many, the Reformation schism from the Roman Church represented a heretical act and a break from an institution with a well-established historical understanding of itself.
    [Show full text]
  • David Devore Cal Poly Pomona [email protected]
    D. DeVore 1 Multiple Temporalities and Narrative Modulation in Eusebius’ Ecclesiastical History David DeVore Cal Poly Pomona [email protected] Introduction To the modern discourse of history, periodization is integral. Europeans and descendants of European colonists divide the past into “ancient,” “medieval,” and “modern” periods. In the United States we divide our past by centuries (eighteenth, nineteenth, twentieth). In much historical discourse the past is divided by the ruling regime or individual (“Han China,” “Victorian England”). For more socially and economically minded historians the past divides into economic system (“feudal period,” “industrial age”).1 In literary and artistic history periodization typically reflects artistic movements (“the Renaissance,” “the Romantic age”).2 We tend to talk, moreover, as if such periodic divisions constitute sharp social, cultural, political, and/or economic breaks. As Michel de Certeau has written, “Each ‘new’ time [period] provides the place for a discourse considering whatever preceded it to be ‘dead,’ but welcoming a ‘past’ that had already been specified by former ruptures. Breakage is therefore the postulate of interpretation (which is constructed as of the present time) and its object….”3 Likewise, Kathleen Davis has asserted that traditional period breaks between medieval and modern “exercise exclusionary force, and require alignment with historically particular cultural, economic, and institutional forms” and “impose homogeneities.”4 These divisions, moreover, structure our institutions: the desired period of study (“medieval historian,” “postcolonial literature”) typically defines positions advertised in the humanities (at least, positions that are still around).5 The discourse and discipline of early Christianity have long been no different. Until recently, most histories of Christianity had divided the first few hundred years of Christianity into periods, naming these periods after the chief characters of Christian events each duration of time.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Maccabees Commentaries on Early Jewish Literature (CEJL)
    Daniel R. Schwartz 2 Maccabees Commentaries on Early Jewish Literature (CEJL) Edited by Loren T. Stuckenbruck and Pieter W. van der Horst · Hermann Lichtenberger Doron Mendels · James R. Mueller Walter de Gruyter · Berlin · New York Daniel R. Schwartz 2 Maccabees Walter de Gruyter · Berlin · New York Ü Printed on acid-free paper which falls within the guidelines of the ANSI to ensure permanence and durability Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schwartz, Daniel R. 2 Maccabees / Daniel R. Schwartz. p. cm. – (Commentaries on early Jewish literature (CEJL)) Includes an English translation of the text of 2nd Maccabees. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-3-11-019118-9 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Bible. O. T. Apocrypha. Maccabees, 2nd – Commentaries. I. Bible. O. T. Apocrypha. Maccabees, 2nd. English. Schwartz. 2008. II. Title. III. Title: Two Maccabees. IV. Title: Second Maccabees. BS1825.53.S39 2008 229’.73077–dc22 2008038566 ISBN 978-3-11-019118-9 Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at <http://dnb.d-nb.de> © Copyright 2008 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, 10785 Berlin, Germany All rights reserved, including those of translation into foreign languages. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in Germany Cover Design: Christopher Schneider, Berlin Typesetting: Dörlemann Satz, Lemförde Printing and binding: Hubert & Co GmbH & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Das Charisma Des Herrschers
    DIETRICH BOSCHUNG UND JÜRGEN HAMMERSTAEDT (HRSG.) DAS CHARISMA DES HERRSCHERS MORPHOMATA In den Herrschaftssystemen der Vormoderne beruhte Macht zu einem erheblichen Teil auf Vorstellungen von einer besonderen Ausstrahlung der Herrschenden. Für den politischen Erfolg war es entscheidend, dass diese Besonderheit überzeugend und nachhaltig ver- mittelt wurde und dass sie auf der anderen Seite die Zustimmung der Beherrschten fand. Die Beiträge des Bandes untersuchen, von der griechisch- römischen Antike ausgehend, in welchen Formen Vor- stellungen vom Charisma des Herrschers ihren Ausdruck fanden. Es geht um die numinose Aura, mit der die privilegierte Nähe vormoderner Herrscher zu göttlichen Wesen bezeichnet wurde. Dabei wird zum einen für die Zeit des Hellenismus und der römischen Kaiserzeit ein breites Spektrum aufgezeigt. Einen zweiten Teil nehmen entsprechende Phänomene aus anderen Epochen und Kulturen ein. DIETRICH BOSCHUNG, JÜRGEN HAMMERSTAEDT (HRSG.) – DAS CHARISMA DES HERRSCHERS MORPHOMATA HERAUSGEGEBEN VON GÜNTER BLAMBERGER UND DIETRICH BOSCHUNG BAND 29 HERAUSGEGEBEN VON DIETRICH BOSCHUNG UND JÜRGEN HAMMERSTAEDT DAS CHARISMA DES HERRSCHERS WILHELM FINK unter dem Förderkennzeichen 01UK0905. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt der Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autoren. Bibliografische Informationen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek: Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbi- bliografie; detaillierte Daten sind im Internet über www.dnb.d-nb.de abruf bar. Alle Rechte, auch die des auszugweisen Nachdrucks, der fotomechanischen Wiedergabe und der Übersetzung vorbehalten. Dies betrifft auch die Verviel- fältigung und Übertragung einzelner Textabschnitte, Zeichnungen oder Bilder durch alle Verfahren wie Speicherung und Übertragung auf Papier, Transparen- te, Filme, Bänder, Platten und andere Medien, soweit es nicht § 53 und 54 UrhG ausdrücklich gestatten. © 2015 Wilhelm Fink, Paderborn Wilhelm Fink GmbH & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • A Commentary on Eusebius of Caesarea Ecclesiastical History Book VIII Written by Andrew William Clay Has Been Approved for the Department of Classics
    A COMMENTARY ON EUSEBIUS OF CAESAREA ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY BOOK VIII by ANDREW WILLIAM CLAY B.A. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2004 M.T.S. Duke University, 2006 M.A. University of Colorado at Boulder, 2008 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics 2012 This thesis entitled: A Commentary on Eusebius of Caesarea Ecclesiastical History Book VIII written by Andrew William Clay has been approved for the Department of Classics (Noel Lenski) (Andrew Cain) (John Gibert) (Aaron Johnson) (Scot Douglass) Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. Clay, Andrew William (Ph.D., Classics) A Commentary on Eusebius of Caesarea Ecclesiastical History Book VIII Thesis directed by Associate Professor Noel Lenski Eusebius of Caesarea (ca. 260-339 CE) was a highly productive and innovative writer of Christian history, apology, and biblical scholarship, and as metropolitan bishop of Palestine, an active participant in fourth-century ecclesiastical politics. His most famous work, the Historia Ecclesiastica (HE), a history of the Church from its foundation to ca. 325, is one of our best sources for the history of early Christianity and reign of Constantine. Book eight of the HE is of particular importance, as it provides the focal point of the work through a critical first-hand account of the Great Persecution (303-313) and events surrounding Constantine’s rise to power.
    [Show full text]