DOCSLIB.ORG

View Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View Annual Report ANNUAL REPORT 2011 SUCCESSFUL quALity Financial and Operational Highlights (unless otherwise USD million specified) 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 Revenue 12,291 10,979 8,165 15,685 13,588 Adjusted EBITDA 2,512 2,597 596 3,526 4,620 Adjusted EBITDA Margin 20.4% 23.7% 7.3% 22.5% 34.0% EBIT 1,749 2,031 (63) (1,228) 3,647 Share of (Losses)/ Profits from Associates (349) 2,435 1,417 (3,302) (14) Pre Tax Profit/(Loss) 610 3,011 839 (6,053) 3,225 Net Profit/(Loss) 237 2,867 821 (5,984) 2,806 Net Profit/(Loss) Margin 1.9% 26.1% 10.1% (38.2%) 20.7% Adjusted Net Profit/ (Loss) 987 792 (1,378) 1,528 2,806 Adjusted Net Profit/ (Loss) Margin 8.0% 7.2% (16.9%) 9.7% 20.7% Recurring Net Profit/ (Loss) 1,981 1,683 (870) 964 2,806 Basic Earnings/(Loss) Per Share (in USD) 0.02 0.19 0.06 (0.49) 0.32 Total Assets 25,345 26,525 23,886 24,005 22,063 Equity Attributable to Shareholders of the Company 10,539 11,456 6,332 4,488 10,095 Net Debt 11,049 11,472 13,633 13,170 8,395 ANNUAL REPORT 2011 SUCCESSFUL quALity UC RUSAL ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Corporate content Profile 3 Chairman’s Statement 7 CEO’s Review 9 Business Overview 13 Management Discussion and Analysis 25 Profiles of Directors and Senior Management 51 Directors’ Report 71 Corporate Governance Report 105 Independent Auditors’ Report 115 Glossary 195 Appendix A - Principal terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement with the Company 201 Appendix B - Principal terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement between Major Shareholders 203 Corporate Information 208 Our Global SUCCESSFUL quALity Footprint UC RUSAL ANNUAL REPORT 2011 ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Corporate 3 Profile UC RUSAL IS THE WORLD’S LARGEST PRODUCER of primary aluminium, alloys and value-added products with a particular focus on the production and sale of value- added products, which is the higher margin upstream segment of the industry. Within its upstream business, UC RUSAL is vertically integrated to a high degree, having secured substantial supplies of bauxite and alumina production capacity. The Company’s core smelters, located in Siberia, Russia, benefit from access to stranded low cost hydro generated electricity enabling it to be a low cost producer of aluminium, with its principal Siberian facilities in close proximity to important Asian markets. Global scale and reach – Market leading position with unique exposure to the global aluminium market. In 2011, UC RUSAL maintained its position as the largest aluminium producer in the world and one of the industry leaders in alumina production. Source: Based on UC RUSAL’s internal company report, and peer companies’ publicly available results, announcements, reports and other information. ANNUAL REPORT 2011 4 SUCCESSFUL quALity Secure access to sources of green and renewable The Taishet aluminium smelter in the Irkutsk region electricity – UC RUSAL has long term contracts with of Russia has a design capacity of 750 thousand tonnes low-cost hydro power plants in Siberia. In 2011, UC RUSAL of aluminium per annum. maintained its position among the leading companies on Proprietary R&D and internal EPCM expertise – the aluminium cost curve. UC RUSAL has developed its own in-house R&D, design and engineering centres and operates RA-300 and RA- INDUSTRY COST CURVE 400 smelting technologies. A new energy efficient and environmentally friendly RA-500 smelting technology is under design. DIVERSIFICATION OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH INVESTMENTS – UC RUSAL owns, through its wholly-owned subsidiary UC RUSAL Investment Management, LLC, a 25%1 plus one share interest in Norilsk Nickel, the world’s largest nickel and palladium producer and one of the leading producers of platinum and copper2. – UC RUSAL’s 50/50 LLP Bogatyr Komir coal joint venture in the Ekibastuz coal basin, one of the largest coal basins in the CIS, providing UC RUSAL with a natural energy hedge. Source: Brook Hunt (A Wood Mackenzie Company) Focus on higher margin upstream business – Primary aluminium production with a focus on alloys and value-added products. UC RUSAL’s target is to increase the production of value-added products by up to 50%, in particular, through improvements to its smelters located in the European part of Russia, the Urals and Siberia. High degree of vertical integration with its upstream business – UC RUSAL’s scale, upstream focus and position on the cost curve provide unique exposure to the aluminium industry. UC RUSAL operates bauxite and nepheline ore mines, alumina refineries, aluminium smelters and casting houses, foil mills and packaging production centres as well as power-generating facilities. Strong growth potential of the UC RUSAL platform – around 1 million tonnes of attributable aluminium capacity currently under construction (equivalent to 25% of the current Company’s production volume): The BEMO Project, which involves the construction of the 3,000 megawatt BEMO HPP and BEMO aluminium smelter in the Krasnoyarsk region of Russia, has a design capacity of 588 thousand tonnes of aluminium per annum. 1 Nominal share. 2 Source: www.nornik.ru. ANNUAL REPORT 2011 5 KEY FACTS UC RUSAL In 2011, UC RUSAL accounted for about 9% of the world’s aluminium output1 and about 9% of the world’s alumina production2, generated from the following facilities located throughout the world: – 16 aluminium smelters – 12 alumina refineries – 8 bauxite mines – 4 foil mills – 2 cathode plants UC RUSAL is listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and is also listed on NYSE Euronext Paris in the form of Global Depositary Shares and on MICEX and RTS in the form of Russian Depository Receipts. KEY SHAREHOLDERS3 Note: * Includes shares held beneficially. ** Amokenga Holdings is ultimately controlled by Glencore International Plc. *** Including 0.22% directly held by the CEO of the Company. 1 Source: Brook Hunt (A Wood Mackenzie Company). 2 Source: Brook Hunt (A Wood Mackenzie Company). 3 Source: This information was taken from www.rusal.com on 31 December 2011. ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Chairman’s 7 Statement UC RUSAL – During the past two years, the Company has reduced its debt level by almost a third. While the current level is still regarded as high, it is comfortably within UC RUSAL’s servicing capability. Furthermore, our completion of the refinancing of the Company’s debt portfolio with an extended maturity profile and reduced interest margins will allow for greater operational and financial flexibility. – The Company’s investor base has widened considerably. The launch of the RDR programme attracted a large number of Russian investors. It is also notable that UC RUSAL has been included in five stock market indices, in Hong Kong, Paris, and Moscow. As a result, the Company’s share liquidity has risen significantly as well. – To reward employees who contribute to the achievement of the Company’s performance indicators and strategic goals, and in order to more closely align employees’ interests with those of the shareholders’, in May 2011, the Board implemented a DEAR SHAREHOLDERS, long-term share incentive plan for high performing employees. Accordingly, we are very pleased with It is a pleasure to be able to prepare this report the fact that we now count employees amongst our following my appointment as Chairman of UC RUSAL in shareholders. March of this year. – Corporate governance continued to be a major I was delighted with the appointment by the priority for the Company. The Board has already Company’s Board of Directors, as I have full confidence approved a comprehensive review of the Company’s in UC RUSAL’s strategic intent and continued growth. corporate governance practices, and a report is Over the past two years, I have gotten to know the due in April of this year. Additional independent Company’s many respected Board members and its highly directors will be appointed to the Board in order to professional executive team. I am also well aware that raise the number of such members to one-third of the the Company’s dedicated staff and many stakeholders Board’s membership, in line with the requirements of remain committed to the success of UC RUSAL. With the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong. all that is already in place, further potential can be In reviewing the year 2011, a few other initiatives of realised. the Company deserve special mention. Many will remember 2011 as another tough year for For example, the Company’s management recognises the global economy, especially in the second half, when the importance of frequent and effective communication the Eurozone crisis threatened financial stability with its stakeholders and potential investors. Greater across the globe. The aluminium industry was not spared. transparency will ensure better understanding of UC Indeed, market uncertainties and volatility resulted in RUSAL. Meetings have therefore been held, and will price pressures, fluctuating product demand, and supply continue to be held on a regular basis, in key global chain disruptions. It was a grim year. investment centres. Special attention is also being paid For UC RUSAL, the overriding goal throughout was to our outreach programme with retail investors. In to stay focused on the Company’s long-term growth, fact, as part of our global investor relations strategy, and remain tenaciously on track with its core business the Company held a major seminar for retail investors in strategies and plans. This, I believe, we were successful Hong Kong in early 2012, in which more than 1,000 local in achieving. investors participated – a clear indication of strong Consider the following: interest. – Not only did UC RUSAL continue to maintain its premier position in the aluminium industry in 2011, the Company’s revenue grew 12% compared to that of 2010.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Expansion of Russian Multinationals After the Crisis: Results of 2011
    Global Expansion of Russian Multinationals after the Crisis: Results of 2011 Report dated April 16, 2013 Moscow and New York, April 16, 2013 The Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, and the Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment (VCC), a joint center of Columbia Law School and the Earth Institute at Columbia University in New York, are releasing the results of their third survey of Russian multinationals today.1 The survey, conducted from November 2012 to February 2013, is part of a long-term study of the global expansion of emerging market non-financial multinational enterprises (MNEs).2 The present report covers the period 2009-2011. Highlights Russia is one of the leading emerging markets in terms of outward foreign direct investments (FDI). Such a position is supported not by several multinational giants but by dozens of Russian MNEs in various industries. Foreign assets of the top 20 Russian non-financial MNEs grew every year covered by this report and reached US$ 111 billion at the end of 2011 (Table 1). Large Russian exporters usually use FDI in support of their foreign activities. As a result, oil and gas and steel companies with considerable exports are among the leading Russian MNEs. However, representatives of other industries also have significant foreign assets. Many companies remained “regional” MNEs. As a result, more than 66% of the ranked companies’ foreign assets were in Europe and Central Asia, with 28% in former republics of the Soviet Union (Annex table 2). Due to the popularity of off-shore jurisdictions to Russian MNEs, some Caribbean islands and Cyprus attracted many Russian subsidiaries with low levels of foreign assets.
    [Show full text]
  • William R. Spiegelberger the Foreign Policy Research Institute Thanks the Carnegie Corporation for Its Support of the Russia Political Economy Project
    Russia Political Economy Project William R. Spiegelberger The Foreign Policy Research Institute thanks the Carnegie Corporation for its support of the Russia Political Economy Project. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Author: William R. Spiegelberger Eurasia Program Leadership Director: Chris Miller Deputy Director: Maia Otarashvili Edited by: Thomas J. Shattuck Designed by: Natalia Kopytnik © 2019 by the Foreign Policy Research Institute April 2019 COVER: Designed by Natalia Kopytnik. Photography: Oleg Deripaska (World Economic Forum); St. Basil’s Cathedral (Adob Stock); Ruble (Adobe Stock); Vladimir Putin (kremlin.ru); Rusal logo (rusal.ru); United States Capitol (Adobe Stock; Viktor Vekselberg (Aleshru/Wikimedia Commons); Alumnium rolls (Adobe Stock); Trade War (Adobe Stock). Our Mission The Foreign Policy Research Institute is dedicated to bringing the insights of scholarship to bear on the foreign policy and national security challenges facing the United States. It seeks to educate the public, teach teachers, train students, and offer ideas to advance U.S. national interests based on a nonpartisan, geopolitical perspective that illuminates contemporary international affairs through the lens of history, geography, and culture. Offering Ideas In an increasingly polarized world, we pride ourselves on our tradition of nonpartisan scholarship. We count among our ranks over 100 affiliated scholars located throughout the nation and the world who appear regularly in national and international media, testify on Capitol Hill, and are consulted by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Deal Drivers Russia
    February 2010 Deal Drivers Russia A survey and review of Russian corporate finance activity Contents Introduction 1 01 M&A Review 2 Overall deal trends 3 Domestic M&A trends 6 Cross-border M&A trends 8 Private equity 11 Acquisition finance 13 Valuations 14 02 Industries 15 Automotive 16 Energy 18 Financial Services 20 Consumer & Retail 22 Industrial Markets 24 Life Sciences 26 Mining 28 Technology, Media & Telecommunications 30 03 Survey Analysis 32 Introduction Prediction may be fast going out of fashion. At the end of 2008, CMS commissioned mergermarket to interview 100 Russian M&A and corporate decision makers to find out what they thought about the situation at the time and what their views on the future were. Falling commodity prices were viewed as the biggest threat, the Financial Services sector was expected to deliver the greatest growth for M&A activity and the bulk of inward investment was expected from Asia. The research revealed that two thirds of the respondents expected the overall level of M&A activity to increase over the course of 2009, with only one third predicting a fall. That third of respondents was right and, in general, the majority got it wrong or very wrong. The survey did get some things right – the predominance of Who knows? What’s the point? We consider the point to be the domestic players, the increase of non-money deals, the in the detail. Our survey looks at the market in 2009 sector number of transactions against a restructuring background, by sector – what was ‘in’ and what was ‘out’.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 4 FORM 4 UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    SEC Form 4 FORM 4 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 OMB APPROVAL OMB Number: 3235-0287 Check this box if no longer subject to STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP Section 16. Form 4 or Form 5 Estimated average burden obligations may continue. See hours per response: 0.5 Instruction 1(b). Filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 30(h) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 1. Name and Address of Reporting Person* 2. Issuer Name and Ticker or Trading Symbol 5. Relationship of Reporting Person(s) to Issuer Warner Music Group Corp. [ WMG ] (Check all applicable) AI Entertainment Holdings LLC Director X 10% Owner Officer (give title Other (specify below) below) (Last) (First) (Middle) 3. Date of Earliest Transaction (Month/Day/Year) C/O ACCESS INDUSTRIES, INC. 02/10/2021 40 WEST 57TH STREET, 28TH FLOOR 4. If Amendment, Date of Original Filed (Month/Day/Year) 6. Individual or Joint/Group Filing (Check Applicable Line) (Street) Form filed by One Reporting Person NEW YORK NY 10019 X Form filed by More than One Reporting Person (City) (State) (Zip) Table I - Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Beneficially Owned 1. Title of Security (Instr. 3) 2. Transaction 2A. Deemed 3. 4. Securities Acquired (A) or 5. Amount of 6. Ownership 7. Nature of Date Execution Date, Transaction Disposed Of (D) (Instr. 3, 4 and 5) Securities Form: Direct Indirect (Month/Day/Year) if any Code (Instr. Beneficially (D) or Indirect Beneficial (Month/Day/Year) 8) Owned Following (I) (Instr.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia in Asia—Asia in Russia: Energy, Economics, and Regional Relations Conference Proceedings
    RUSSIA IN ASI A — ASIA IN RUSSIA: ENERGY Russia in Asia—Asia in Russia: Energy, Economics, and Regional Relations , ECONOMICS, AND REGIONAL RELA Conference Proceedings Edited by F. Joseph Dresen TIONS OCCASIONAL P APER #292 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars OCCASIONAL PAPER #292 KENNAN One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW INSTITUTE Washington, DC 20004-3027 Tel. (202) 691-4100 Fax (202) 691-4247 www.wilsoncenter.org/kennan The Kennan Institute is a division of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Through its programs of residential scholarships, meetings, and publications, the Institute encourages scholarship on the successor states to the Soviet Union, embracing a broad range of fields in the social sci- ences and humanities. The Kennan Institute is suppored by contributions from foundations, corporations, individuals, and the United States Government. Kennan Institute Occasional Papers The Kennan Institute makes Occasional Papers available to all those interested. Occasional Papers are submitted by Kennan Institute scholars and visiting speakers. Copies of Occasional Papers and a list of papers currently available can be obtained free of charge by contacting: Occasional Papers Kennan Institute One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20004-3027 (202) 691-4100 This Occasional Paper has been produced with the support of Federal Conference Funds from the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and the Program for Research and Training on Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union of the U.S. Department of State (funded by the Soviet and East European Research and Training Act of 1983, or Title VIII).The Kennan Institute is most grateful for this support.
    [Show full text]
  • Pace Through the Race
    annual REPORT 2018 PACE THROUGH THE RACE RUSAL ANNUAL REPORT 2018 REPORT ANNUAL RUSAL CONTENTS FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS 2 CORPORATE PROFILE 5 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT 11 CEO’S REVIEW 14 BUSINESS OVERVIEW 17 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 41 PROFILES OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT 81 DIRECTORS’ REPORT 99 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT 177 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 197 GLOSSARY 343 APPENDIX A 355 - Principal Terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement with the Company APPENDIX B 359 - Principal Terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement among Major Shareholders only CORPORATE INFORMATION 366 1 Financial and Operational Highlights Annual Report RUSAL 2018 FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS 2 Financial and Operational Highlights Annual Report RUSAL 2018 USD million (unless otherwise specified) 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Revenue 10,280 9,969 7,983 8,680 9,357 Adjusted EBITDA 2,163 2,120 1,489 2,015 1,514 Adjusted EBITDA Margin 21.0% 21.3% 18.7% 23.2% 16.2% EBIT 1,481 1,523 1,068 1,409 942 Share of Profits from Associates and joint ventures 955 620 848 368 536 Pre Tax Profit 1,953 1,288 1,354 763 147 Profit/(Loss) 1,698 1,222 1,179 558 (91) Profit/(Loss) Margin 16.5% 12.3% 14.8% 6.4% (1.0%) Adjusted Net Profit 856 1,077 292 671 17 Adjusted Net Profit Margin 8.3% 10.8% 3.7% 7.7% 0.2% Recurring Net Profit 1,695 1,573 959 1,097 486 Basic Earnings/(Loss) Per Share (in USD) 0.112 0.080 0.078 0.037 (0.006) Total Assets 15,777 15,774 14,452 12,809 14,857 Equity Attributable to Shareholders of the Company 5,209 4,444 3,299 1,391 2,237 Net Debt 7,442 7,648 8,421 8,372 8,837 3 Reduced weight Manoeuvring and speedy CORPORATE 01 PROFILE Corporate Profile Annual Report RUSAL 2018 CORPORATE PROFILE RUSAL is a low-cost, vertically integrated aluminium producer with core smelting operations located in Siberia, Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • International Arbitration Legal Bulletin
    INTERNATIONAL LEGAL BULLETIN FOCUS ON ARBITRATION JULY 2016 CONTENTS The Setting Aside of the Russia/Yukos Awards by the District The Setting Aside of the Russia/ Court in The Hague: What Is the Role of the Courts? Yukos Awards by the District Court in The Hague: What Is the Role of the Courts? . 1 It is not often that $50-billion arbitration awards are issued. So it is understandable why the global arbitral community was awaiting the U .S Courts Using Local “Rules of Procedure” as a Stopper to decision of The Hague District Court in The Russian Federation v. Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Unleashing International Veteran Petroleum Limited, The Russian Federation v. Yukos Universal Criticism: Founded or Not? . 3 Limited, and The Russian Federation v. Hulley Enterprises Limited Miami’s International Commercial (“Yukos”). On April 20, the wait ended. The District Court quashed Arbitration Court: What It Is and How to Get There . 6 the three awards totaling nearly $50 billion, holding that Russia never agreed to arbitrate disputes under the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”) . How did the District Court reach this conclusion? Russia had, after all, signed the ECT in 1994. While it terminated provisional application of the ECT in 2009, under the ECT’s terms, investments made before this date were still subject to investor-State arbitration of expropriation disputes. Once it became a signatory, Article 45(1) of the ECT made the ECT provisionally applicable to Russia unless provisional application of the ECT was inconsistent with Russia’s constitution, laws, or regulations. Russia could have submitted a declaration at the time of execution under Article 45(2) of the ECT that it was not able to accept provisional application of the ECT pending entry into force of the ECT, but it did not do so--unlike several other countries which had submitted such declarations.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIA-RUSSIA Identifying New Opportunities Contents Russian Federation Fact Sheet
    INDIA-RUSSIA Identifying New Opportunities Contents Russian Federation Fact Sheet . 3 n Why Russia? . 3 n Russia vs Rest of World comparison . 6 Russian Far East. 8 n Why the Russian Far East. 8 Title : India-Russia: Identifying New Opportunities v Russia Far East - Basic Facts . 9 Year : September 2017 v International Importance of the Russia Far East . 10 Copyright : No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form by photo, photoprint, microfilm or any other means n without the written permission of FICCI and Ernst & Young Far East and the world. 11 Disclaimer: The information and opinions contained in this document have been compiled or arrived at from sources v International relations . 11 believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty expressed is made to their accuracy, completeness or correctness. This document is for information purpose only. The information contained in this document is published for n Opportunities for Indian Industry. 11 the assistance of the recipient but is not to be relied upon as authoritative or taken in substitution for the exercise of judgment by any recipient. This document is not intended to be a Reverse SEZs with Russian Far East. 13 substitute for professional, technical or legal advice. All opinions expressed in this document are subject to n change without notice. Background. 13 FICCI and Ernst & Young do not accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss howsoever arising from n Reverse SEZs Example. 14 any use of this document or its contents or otherwise arising in connection herewith. 1 Contents Russian Federation Fact Sheet .
    [Show full text]
  • TNK-BP Limited)
    ROSNEFT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED 30 JUNE 2013 (UNAUDITED) ROSNEFT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED Interim Condensed Consolidated Income Statement and Statement of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) (expressed in millions of USD) Three months Six months Three months ended Six months ended ended 30 June 2012 ended 30 June 2012 30 June 2013 (reclassified) Note 30 June 2013 (reclassified) 14,164 14,255 Gross Proceeds 5 28,380 30,344 (4,311) (4,679) Less: export duties (8,016) (9,311) 9,853 9,576 Sales and other operating revenues 5 20,364 21,033 (3) (103) (Loss)/earnings from equity-accounted investments 9 (15) 104 7 - Gain on disposals of businesses 7 - (2,912) (3,065) Taxes other than income tax 15 (6,069) (6,289) (1,350) (1,152) Operating expenses (2,491) (2,297) (1,166) (1,329) Purchases of oil, oil products and other products (2,323) (2,956) (1,398) (1,253) Transportation expenses (2,777) (2,600) (703) (552) Depreciation, depletion and amortisation 10 (1,351) (1,123) (207) (354) Selling, distribution and administrative expenses (571) (694) (643) (22) Loss on disposals and impairment of assets 4 (711) (323) (55) (56) Exploration expenses (115) (101) 1,423 1,690 Operating profit 3,948 4,754 404 69 Exchange gain/(loss), net 606 (2) (49) (54) Finance cost (124) (124) 16 23 Interest income and net other financial income 2 1 (26) - Other expenses 18 (102) - 1,768 1,728 Profit before income taxes 4,330 4,629 (434) (781) Income tax benefit/(expense)
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report for 2014
    UC RUSAL Sustainability Report for 2014 August 2015 RUSAL Sustainability Report 2014 Contents A message from the CEO 4 1 About the Company 5 1.1 Business overview 6 1.3 Key performance indicators 9 1.4 Milestones 11 2 Management system 13 2.1 Corporate governance 13 2.2 Internal controls and risk management 17 2.3 The Business System of UC RUSAL 21 2.4 Quality management 26 2.5 Supply chain 30 2.6 Research and technological development 35 3 Environmental protection 39 3.1 Approach 39 3.2 Climate change 42 3.3 Land and biodiversity 43 3.4 Water 46 3.5 Energy 49 3.6 Air 50 3.7 Waste 53 3.8 Investments in environmental protection 57 3.9 Plans for 2015 and the medium-term outlook 59 4 Occupational health, industrial and fire safety 60 4.1 Approach 60 4.2 Management system 60 4.3 Measures 63 4.4 Performance 65 4.5 Plans for 2015 and the medium-term outlook 69 5 Employees 70 5.1 Approach 70 5.2 Staff structure and plans for 2015 73 5.3 Recruitment 75 5.4 Training and development 76 5.5 Incentive system 79 5.6 Social security 80 6 Stakeholder relations 81 6.1 Participation in industry initiatives and forums 81 6.2 Key topics and forms of stakeholder engagement 82 7 Investments in developing local communities 85 7.1 Strategic approach to developing local communities 85 7.2 Key results of 2014 86 7.3 Plans for 2015 and the medium-term outlook 93 8 GRI Table and compliance with UN Global Compact principles 94 UC RUSAL Sustainability report 2014 A message from the CEO Dear shareholders, partners and colleagues! I have the honour to present for your attention UC RUSAL’s ninth Sustainability Report, which is prepared in accordance with the provisions of GRI Guidelines and UN Global Compact principles.
    [Show full text]
  • United Company Rusal
    THIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION If you are in any doubt as to any aspect of this circular or as to the action to be taken, you should consult your licensed securities dealer or other registered institution in securities, bank manager, solicitor, professional accountant or other professional adviser. If you have sold or transferred all your shares in United Company RUSAL Plc, you should at once hand this circular with the accompanying form of proxy to the purchaser or transferee or to the bank, stockbroker or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected for transmission to the purchaser or the transferee. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this circular, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this circular. UNITED COMPANY RUSAL PLC (Incorporated under the laws of Jersey with limited liability) (Stock Code: 486) PROPOSED 2020, 2021 AND 2022 ANNUAL CAPS FOR CONTINUING CONNECTED TRANSACTIONS AND NOTICE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING Independent financial adviser to the Independent Board Committee and Independent Shareholders SOMERLEY CAPITAL LIMITED A letter from the Board is set out on pages 4 to 20 of this circular. A letter of recommendation from the Independent Board Committee is set out on page 21 of this circular. A letter from the Independent Financial Adviser containing its advice to the Independent Board Committee and the Independent Shareholders is set out on pages 22 to 35 of this circular.
    [Show full text]
  • SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 13G Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 3)* MediWound Ltd. (Name of Issuer) Ordinary Shares, par value NIS 0.01 per share (Title of Class of Securities) M68830104 (CUSIP Number) December 31, 2018 (Date of Event Which Requires Filing of this Statement) Check the appropriate box to designate the rule pursuant to which this Schedule is filed: ☐ Rule 13d-1(b) ☐ Rule 13d-1(c) ☒ Rule 13d-1(d) * The remainder of this cover page shall be filled out for a reporting person’s initial filing on this form with respect to the subject class of securities, and for any subsequent amendment containing information which would alter the disclosures provided in a prior cover page. The information required in the remainder of this cover page shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of the section of the Act but shall be subject to all other provisions of that Act (however, see the Notes). 1 of 9 CUSIP No. M68830104 1 NAMES OF REPORTING PERSONS Access Industries Holdings LLC 2 CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX IF A MEMBER OF A GROUP (SEE INSTRUCTIONS) (a) ☐ (b) ☐ 3 SEC USE ONLY 4 CITIZENSHIP OR PLACE OF ORGANIZATION State of Delaware 5 SOLE VOTING POWER 0 NUMBER OF 6 SHARED VOTING POWER SHARES BENEFICIALLY OWNED BY 9,429,555 EACH 7 SOLE DISPOSITIVE POWER REPORTING PERSON WITH 0 8 SHARED DISPOSITIVE POWER 9,429,555 9 AGGREGATE AMOUNT BENEFICIALLY OWNED BY EACH REPORTING PERSON 9,429,555 10 CHECK BOX IF THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT IN ROW (9) EXCLUDES CERTAIN SHARES (SEE INSTRUCTIONS) ☐ 11 PERCENT OF CLASS REPRESENTED BY AMOUNT IN ROW (9) 34.69% 1 12 TYPE OF REPORTING PERSON (SEE INSTRUCTIONS) OO (Limited Liability Company) 1 Based on 27,178,839 outstanding ordinary shares as of September 30, 2018 as reported on the Issuer’s Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2018 (the “November 2018 Form 6-K”).
    [Show full text]