DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy, Economics, and Regional Relations Conference Proceedings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy, Economics, and Regional Relations Conference Proceedings RUSSIA IN ASI A — ASIA IN RUSSIA: ENERGY Russia in Asia—Asia in Russia: Energy, Economics, and Regional Relations , ECONOMICS, AND REGIONAL RELA Conference Proceedings Edited by F. Joseph Dresen TIONS OCCASIONAL P APER #292 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars OCCASIONAL PAPER #292 KENNAN One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW INSTITUTE Washington, DC 20004-3027 Tel. (202) 691-4100 Fax (202) 691-4247 www.wilsoncenter.org/kennan The Kennan Institute is a division of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Through its programs of residential scholarships, meetings, and publications, the Institute encourages scholarship on the successor states to the Soviet Union, embracing a broad range of fields in the social sci- ences and humanities. The Kennan Institute is suppored by contributions from foundations, corporations, individuals, and the United States Government. Kennan Institute Occasional Papers The Kennan Institute makes Occasional Papers available to all those interested. Occasional Papers are submitted by Kennan Institute scholars and visiting speakers. Copies of Occasional Papers and a list of papers currently available can be obtained free of charge by contacting: Occasional Papers Kennan Institute One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20004-3027 (202) 691-4100 This Occasional Paper has been produced with the support of Federal Conference Funds from the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and the Program for Research and Training on Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union of the U.S. Department of State (funded by the Soviet and East European Research and Training Act of 1983, or Title VIII).The Kennan Institute is most grateful for this support. The views expressed in Kennan Institute Occasional Papers are those of the authors. ©2005 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. www.wilsoncenter.org Russia in Asia—Asia in Russia: Energy, Economics, and Regional Relations Conference Proceedings Edited by: F. Joseph Dresen OCCASIONAL PAPER #292 Contents Russia in Asia—Asia in Russia: Energy, Economics, and Regional Relations Cosponsored by the Kennan Institute and Asia Program Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars July 22–23, 2004 Washington, D.C. DAY 1: THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST IN ASIA 1 Introductory Speaker: Eugene Lawson, President, U.S.-Russia Business Council PANEL 1: CONDITIONS AND PROSPECTS IN THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST 5 Chair: Blair A. Ruble, Director, Kennan Institute, Woodrow Wilson Center “Economic Trends in the Russian Far East and Russia’s Economic Policy towards the Pacific Region,” Alexander Fedorovsky, Head of Section, Pacific Studies, Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Moscow; “Regional Politics and the Competition for Influence,” Robert Orttung, Associate Research Professor, Transnational Crime and Corruption Center, American University; Visiting Scholar, Center for Security Studies, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology; and former Title VIII-supported Short-term Scholar, Kennan Institute; “Environmental Issues in the Russian Far East,” Josh Newell, author, The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development PANEL 2: RFE-ASIA ENERGY TRADE AS AN ENGINE OF INTEGRATION: NOT A DONE DEAL 23 Chair: Paul Rodzianko, Senior Vice President, Access Industries, Inc. “East Siberia-Regional Resource Potential,” Shawn McCormick, Vice President, International Affairs, TNK-BP; “Sakhalin’s Oil and Gas Projects: Current Status and Future Prospects,” Michael Bradshaw, Professor and Head, Department of Geography, University of Leicester; “Russian Oil and Gas: The Battle Within and Without for Control and Access,” Marshall Goldman, Kathryn W. Davis Professor of Soviet Economics, Wellesley College, and Associate Director, Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies Harvard University; “Demographics in the Russian Far East,” Nicholas Eberstadt, Henry Wendt Chair in Political Economy, American Enterprise Institute Concluding speaker: Jeffrey L. Miller, Senior Vice President and Head of Export Finance, Export-Import Bank of the United States v DAY 2: ASIA AND ITS RUSSIAN NEIGHBOR 51 Introductory Speaker: Robert Sutter, Visiting Professor, Department of Government, Georgetown University, and former National Intelligence Officer for East Asia and the Pacific, U.S. National Intelligence Council PANEL 3: CUSTOMERS, COMPETITORS, AND PARTNERS: ENERGY RELATIONS IN NORTHEAST ASIA AND RUSSIA 55 Chair: Robert Manning, Senior Counselor, Energy, Technology and Science Policy, Office of Policy Planning, U.S. Department of State “Emerging Russia-China Energy Relations: Will Needs Be Met by Supplies?” James Dorian, international energy economist, Washington, D.C.; “The Politics of Japanese-Russian Energy Relations,” Joseph Ferguson, Director of Northeast Asia Studies, National Bureau of Asian Research; “Korea’s Access to Russian Energy,” John Fetter, President, FSI Energy PANEL 4: INTEGRATION VS. ISOLATION— NORTHEAST ASIA’S APPROACH TO RUSSIA 77 Chair: Robert Hathaway, Director, Asia Program, Woodrow Wilson Center “Maneuvering over the Russian Far East’s Place in Northeast Asia,” Gilbert Rozman, Musgrave Professor of Sociology, Princeton University; “The Russian Far East and Transnational Security Challenges in Northeast Asia,” Elizabeth Wishnick, Research Associate, Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University; “Nuclear Security Issues in Northeast Asia,” Daniel B. Poneman, Principal, Scowcroft Group PANELIST BIOGRAPHIES 95 vi RUSSIA IN ASIA—ASIA IN RUSSIA: ENERGY, ECONOMICS, AND REGIONAL RELATIONS Preface he Woodrow Wilson Center’s Kennan Institute and Asia Program convened a conference in July 2004 to examine the evolving relationships among the countries of Northeast T Asia—Russia, China, Japan, and North and South Korea—with an eye toward under- standing the growing importance of energy in the region. For much of the past century, Russia did not have a particularly close relationship with its Asian neighbors. Its focus was on Europe and the United States, and its territories in the Russian Far East were long regarded by Moscow as a source for natural resources and a military outpost. Following the fall of the Soviet Union, the region experienced steep economic and population declines. At the same time, the transformation of Russia to a market economy and the reworking of its federal system produced a host of new actors and relationships that have been reshaping Russia’s presence in Asia. The greatest factor in recent years behind Russia’s growing importance to the region is the energy reserves situated in the Russian Far East and Siberia, and the demand for those reserves from Russia’s Northeast Asian neighbors. As Eugene Lawson points out in his introductory remarks, the Russian Far East is adjacent to two of the world’s top three energy markets and “is ideally suited to serve as a major energy supply link between Russia’s oil and gas fields and China and Japan, as well as Korea, India, the countries of South East Asia, and the U.S.” Russia’s neighbors have had to adapt to Russia’s energy wealth—China, Japan and South Korea have all pursued new economic relationships with Russia. Yet Russia cannot maximize these new economic relationships on its own. To realize the potential of its energy projects in the region, Russia must rely on investment and technology from foreign multinationals. Whether it will suc- cessfully do so is in some doubt, according to several panelists. The climate and terrain where the resources are situated are harsh and unforgiving. The cost of developing the various proposed gas and oil pipelines runs into the billions and is constantly increasing. More daunting than the phys- ical climate is the investment climate, especially in recent years. Nevertheless, Russia is enhancing its status as a major player in Northeast Asia. Russia has a seat at the table in the multilateral talks on the nuclear issue in North Korea, and has the poten- tial to play a vital role in finding a resolution. China and Japan are vying with each other for access to Russian energy reserves, allowing Russia to push for deals that serve its geopolitical, as well as economic, interests. Russia must also work to balance economic development with preserving one of the world’s most diverse and important ecological areas. Yet, as became clear in several of the presentations during the conference, a number of chal- lenges remain. “Soft” security issues such as corruption, cross-border criminal activity, and pop- ulation movements hinder legal trade in non-energy sectors and Russia’s closer integration in the regional economy. The geopolitical landscape of Northeast Asia is changing, and this conference was an attempt to assess the current situation to inform Russia-watchers in Washington of the complex dynam- ics underway in Asiatic Russia, the implications for Russia’s geostrategic role in the region, and the economic and political ramifications for China, Japan, and North and South Korea. The conference was conceived and planned with the assistance of Mike Bradshaw of the University of Leicester, and I am pleased to take this opportunity to thank him for his efforts. My colleagues in the Asia Program provided much needed assistance and support in organizing and running the conference. I also would like to acknowledge the Woodrow Wilson Center for pro- viding the federal conference funds that made the event possible. —F.Joseph Dresen vii The Russian Far East
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Japan, Russia and the "Northern Territories" Dispute : Neighbors in Search of a Good Fence
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2002-09 Japan, Russia and the "northern territories" dispute : neighbors in search of a good fence Morris, Gregory L. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/4801 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS JAPAN, RUSSIA AND THE “NORTHERN TERRITORIES” DISPUTE: NEIGHBORS IN SEARCH OF A GOOD FENCE by Gregory L. Morris September, 2002 Thesis Advisors: Mikhail Tsypkin Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED September 2002 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: Japan, Russia And The “Northern Territories” Dispute: 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Neighbors In Search Of A Good Fence n/a 6. AUTHOR(S) LT Gregory L.
    [Show full text]
  • 42 Cross-Border Migration In
    The Mongolian Journal of International Affairs Number 13, 2006 CROSS-BORDER MIGRATION IN NORTHEAST ASIA: IMPLICATIONS FOR MONGOLIA By Tsuneo Akaha (USA) Introduction The landscape of international relations in Northeast Asia is changing, and migration and other types of human flows within and between the countries of the region are becoming an important part. The state-centric approach to and view of international relations that prevailed in this part of the world during the Cold War can no longer describe or explain the logic and shape of emerging realities. The “Cold War,” as the ideological order of the state-centric world, has become a thing of the past, although its remnants can still be seen on the divided Korean peninsula. Old and new manifestations of nationalism are interacting with expressions of nascent regionalism.1 Non-state actors that have transformed global politics have become important agents of change in this region as well. They are giving rise to new issues, new perspectives, and new identities among the peoples of Northeast Asia, although resistance to the forces of change is also visible. Such topics as human security, labor migration, human trafficking, and refugees are emerging as a focus of political debate and policy discussion in the region. In order to examine the changing population trends and migration patterns in Northeast Asia and their implications for international relations in the region, the Monterey Institute of International Studies’ Center for East Asian Studies organized in 2002 a multi-year research project drawing on the expertise of researchers from the region as well as from the United States and the United Kingdom.2 The findings and conclusions from this project were published in the book Crossing National Borders: Human Migration Issues in Northeast Asia from the United Nations University, Tokyo.3 The book illuminates the cases of Chinese migrants in the Russian Far East; Russians, Chinese, and 1 Tsuneo Akaha, ed., Politics and Economics in Northeast Asia: Nationalism and Re- gionalism in Contention, New York: St.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Yulia MIKHAILOVA: Curriculum Vitae Amd Publications
    Hiroshima Journal of International Studies Volume 19 2013 Professor Yulia MIKHAILOVA: Curriculum Vitae amd Publications Curriculum Vitae Date of Birth: February 23,1948 Nationality: Australia; Permanent Resident of Japan Educational Background 1966.09 − 1972.02 Leningrad State University, Faculty of Oriental Studies, Department of Far Eastern History Bachelor with Honors in Japanese History Thesis title: Liberal Ideas in Early Modern Japan 1972.11 -1976.11 Soviet (Russian) Academy of Science Institute of Oriental Studies, Ph.D. student Ph.D. in History, 19/09/1979 Dissertation title: The Movement for Freedom and Popular Rights in Japan: History and Ideology (1870s and 1880s) Employment Record 1972.02 – 1993.01 Junior Researcher, Researcher, Senior Researcher, Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, Russia 1982.09 -1988.06 Part-time Lecturer, Faculty of Oriental Studies, Leningrad State University, Soviet Union 1993.02 – 1996.03 Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Asian and International Studies, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia 1996.04 – 1998.03 Faculty of International Studies, Hiroshima City University, Japan, Associate Professor 1998.04 – 2013.03 Faculty of International Studies, Graduate School of International Studies, Hiroshima City University, Japan, Professor 2010.04 – present Osaka University, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Part-time Lecturer 2013.06—2013.07 Department of European History and Culture,Heidelberg University, Germany, Visiting Scholar Fellowships and Grants Received: Japan Foundation Fellowship, 1983, Topic of research: Motoori Norinaga: His Life and Ideas. Canon Foundation in Europe Fellowship, 1992-1993. Topic of research: The Interrelation Between Confucianism and Shinto in Tokugawa Japan. 148 Erwin-von-Baelz Guest Professorship, Tuebingen University, Germany, November 1992, lectures and workshops for students on Intellectual History of Tokugawa and Meiji Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Expansion of Russian Multinationals After the Crisis: Results of 2011
    Global Expansion of Russian Multinationals after the Crisis: Results of 2011 Report dated April 16, 2013 Moscow and New York, April 16, 2013 The Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, and the Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment (VCC), a joint center of Columbia Law School and the Earth Institute at Columbia University in New York, are releasing the results of their third survey of Russian multinationals today.1 The survey, conducted from November 2012 to February 2013, is part of a long-term study of the global expansion of emerging market non-financial multinational enterprises (MNEs).2 The present report covers the period 2009-2011. Highlights Russia is one of the leading emerging markets in terms of outward foreign direct investments (FDI). Such a position is supported not by several multinational giants but by dozens of Russian MNEs in various industries. Foreign assets of the top 20 Russian non-financial MNEs grew every year covered by this report and reached US$ 111 billion at the end of 2011 (Table 1). Large Russian exporters usually use FDI in support of their foreign activities. As a result, oil and gas and steel companies with considerable exports are among the leading Russian MNEs. However, representatives of other industries also have significant foreign assets. Many companies remained “regional” MNEs. As a result, more than 66% of the ranked companies’ foreign assets were in Europe and Central Asia, with 28% in former republics of the Soviet Union (Annex table 2). Due to the popularity of off-shore jurisdictions to Russian MNEs, some Caribbean islands and Cyprus attracted many Russian subsidiaries with low levels of foreign assets.
    [Show full text]
  • William R. Spiegelberger the Foreign Policy Research Institute Thanks the Carnegie Corporation for Its Support of the Russia Political Economy Project
    Russia Political Economy Project William R. Spiegelberger The Foreign Policy Research Institute thanks the Carnegie Corporation for its support of the Russia Political Economy Project. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Author: William R. Spiegelberger Eurasia Program Leadership Director: Chris Miller Deputy Director: Maia Otarashvili Edited by: Thomas J. Shattuck Designed by: Natalia Kopytnik © 2019 by the Foreign Policy Research Institute April 2019 COVER: Designed by Natalia Kopytnik. Photography: Oleg Deripaska (World Economic Forum); St. Basil’s Cathedral (Adob Stock); Ruble (Adobe Stock); Vladimir Putin (kremlin.ru); Rusal logo (rusal.ru); United States Capitol (Adobe Stock; Viktor Vekselberg (Aleshru/Wikimedia Commons); Alumnium rolls (Adobe Stock); Trade War (Adobe Stock). Our Mission The Foreign Policy Research Institute is dedicated to bringing the insights of scholarship to bear on the foreign policy and national security challenges facing the United States. It seeks to educate the public, teach teachers, train students, and offer ideas to advance U.S. national interests based on a nonpartisan, geopolitical perspective that illuminates contemporary international affairs through the lens of history, geography, and culture. Offering Ideas In an increasingly polarized world, we pride ourselves on our tradition of nonpartisan scholarship. We count among our ranks over 100 affiliated scholars located throughout the nation and the world who appear regularly in national and international media, testify on Capitol Hill, and are consulted by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter J. Boettke
    PETER J. BOETTKE BB&T Professor for the Study of Capitalism, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, & University Professor of Economics and Philosophy Department of Economics, MSN 3G4 George Mason University Fairfax, VA 22030 Tel: 703-993-1149 Fax: 703-993-1133 Web: http://www.peter-boettke.com http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=182652 http://www.coordinationproblem.org PERSONAL Date of birth: January 3, 1960 Nationality: United States EDUCATION Ph.D. in Economics, George Mason University, January, 1989 M.A. in Economics, George Mason University, January, 1987 B.A. in Economics, Grove City College, May, 1983 TITLE OF DOCTORAL THESIS: The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism, 1918-1928 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Academic Positions 1987 –88 Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, George Mason University 1988 –90 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, School of Business Administration, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309 1990 –97 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, New York University, New York, NY 10003 1997 –98 Associate Professor, Department of Economics and Finance, School of Business, Manhattan College, Riverdale, NY 10471 1998 – 2003 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030 (tenured Fall 2000) 2003 –07 Professor, Department of Economics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030 2007 – University Professor, George Mason University 2011 – Affiliate Faculty, Department of Philosophy, George Mason University FIELDS OF INTEREST
    [Show full text]
  • Deal Drivers Russia
    February 2010 Deal Drivers Russia A survey and review of Russian corporate finance activity Contents Introduction 1 01 M&A Review 2 Overall deal trends 3 Domestic M&A trends 6 Cross-border M&A trends 8 Private equity 11 Acquisition finance 13 Valuations 14 02 Industries 15 Automotive 16 Energy 18 Financial Services 20 Consumer & Retail 22 Industrial Markets 24 Life Sciences 26 Mining 28 Technology, Media & Telecommunications 30 03 Survey Analysis 32 Introduction Prediction may be fast going out of fashion. At the end of 2008, CMS commissioned mergermarket to interview 100 Russian M&A and corporate decision makers to find out what they thought about the situation at the time and what their views on the future were. Falling commodity prices were viewed as the biggest threat, the Financial Services sector was expected to deliver the greatest growth for M&A activity and the bulk of inward investment was expected from Asia. The research revealed that two thirds of the respondents expected the overall level of M&A activity to increase over the course of 2009, with only one third predicting a fall. That third of respondents was right and, in general, the majority got it wrong or very wrong. The survey did get some things right – the predominance of Who knows? What’s the point? We consider the point to be the domestic players, the increase of non-money deals, the in the detail. Our survey looks at the market in 2009 sector number of transactions against a restructuring background, by sector – what was ‘in’ and what was ‘out’.
    [Show full text]
  • Imatcv2014 [Autumn].Pages
    Ivan Michael Arreguín-Toft 156 Bay State Road, Room 305 Boston University Boston, MA 02215 Pardee School of Global Studies 617·353·9399 The College of Arts and Sciences [email protected] Education The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Ph.D. in Political Science (International Relations), 1998: Arts of Darkness: Guerrilla Warfare & Barbarism in Asymmetric Conflict M.A. in Political Science, 1992 University of California, Santa Barbara, 1990 B.A. in Political Science, and Slavic Languages and Literatures, Magna Cum Laude University of Maryland, European Division, 1987 A.A. General Curriculum, with honors Defense Language Institute, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany, 1986 Distinguished honor graduate, Russian refresher course Defense Language Institute, San Antonio, Texas, 1984 Graduate, Russian basic course Teaching and Employment Experience University of Oxford, Autumn 2012–14 Departmental Lecturer in Public Policy, The Blavatnik School of Government Co-convener, Security for Global Governors (Trinity Term, 2014) Chair of Examiners Cyber Doctoral Training Centre Convener: Cybersecurity as a Major Policy Challenge (Hilary Term, 2014) Fellow, Oxford Martin School, Co-Chair, Dimension 1: National Cyber Security Policy and Defense, Global Cybersecurity Capacity Building Centre Visiting Fellow, Changing Character of Warfare Programme O.P. Jindal Global University, Summer School in International Law and Global Governance Convener: Cybersecurity Boston University, Boston, MA, USA, July 2009– Assistant Professor of International Relations, The Frederick S. Pardee School of Global Studies Courses: • Introduction to International Relations: 300+ undergraduates, cross-listed with Political Science • Gender and War: open to advanced undergraduates and graduate students and cross-listed with Women’s Studies, and Political Science • Research Methods for International Relations Practitioners: a seminar for graduate students • International Security: a seminar for graduate students 1 Ivan Arreguín-Toft c.v.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review John T
    Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 13 Issue 1 Spring Spring 1992 Book Review John T. Shaw Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb Recommended Citation John T Shaw, Book Review, 13 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 239 (1992-1993) This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. BOOK REVIEW What Went Wrong With Perestroika By Marshall I. Goldman. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1991. Pp. 238. John T. Shaw* There is no shortage of intriguing issues for political analysts to pon- der as they attempt to understand the tumultuous years during which Mikhail Gorbachev governed the Soviet Union and then presided over its disintegration. Soviet withdrawal from Eastern Europe and the rapid, astonishing unraveling of the vast multinational empire are among the most signifi- cant events of the twentieth century, and Mikhail Gorbachev, the archi- tect and victim of reform, is likely to endure in the public mind as the prototypical tragic figure: a talented, complex, compelling man who was devoured by a revolution he began. Fundamental questions about the Gorbachev era abound. Was there ever a chance that the Soviet Union Gorbachev inherited in 1985 could be reformed? If reform was possible, did Gorbachev fail because his vision was flawed or
    [Show full text]
  • Form 4 FORM 4 UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    SEC Form 4 FORM 4 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 OMB APPROVAL OMB Number: 3235-0287 Check this box if no longer subject to STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP Section 16. Form 4 or Form 5 Estimated average burden obligations may continue. See hours per response: 0.5 Instruction 1(b). Filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 30(h) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 1. Name and Address of Reporting Person* 2. Issuer Name and Ticker or Trading Symbol 5. Relationship of Reporting Person(s) to Issuer Warner Music Group Corp. [ WMG ] (Check all applicable) AI Entertainment Holdings LLC Director X 10% Owner Officer (give title Other (specify below) below) (Last) (First) (Middle) 3. Date of Earliest Transaction (Month/Day/Year) C/O ACCESS INDUSTRIES, INC. 02/10/2021 40 WEST 57TH STREET, 28TH FLOOR 4. If Amendment, Date of Original Filed (Month/Day/Year) 6. Individual or Joint/Group Filing (Check Applicable Line) (Street) Form filed by One Reporting Person NEW YORK NY 10019 X Form filed by More than One Reporting Person (City) (State) (Zip) Table I - Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Beneficially Owned 1. Title of Security (Instr. 3) 2. Transaction 2A. Deemed 3. 4. Securities Acquired (A) or 5. Amount of 6. Ownership 7. Nature of Date Execution Date, Transaction Disposed Of (D) (Instr. 3, 4 and 5) Securities Form: Direct Indirect (Month/Day/Year) if any Code (Instr. Beneficially (D) or Indirect Beneficial (Month/Day/Year) 8) Owned Following (I) (Instr.
    [Show full text]
  • Affect and Material Practices of Russian Women in Japan K
    2018 ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА Т. 63. Вып. 2 ИСТОРИЯ ЭТНОГРАФИЯ, ЭТНОЛОГИЯ И АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ Procuring, Crafting, and Sensing: Affect and Material Practices of Russian Women in Japan K. V. Golovina For citation: Golovina K. V. Procuring, Crafting, and Sensing: Affect and Material Practices of Russian Women in Japan. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2018, vol. 63, issue 2, pp. 488–505. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2018.211 This paper draws its data from fieldwork on female Russian migrants in Japan, paying close at- tention to their material practices and, notably, their craftwork. The discussion focuses on the objects and clothes observed in localities where these material practices are enacted, namely, migrants’ homes and places where migrant festive events take place. Second-hand shops are discussed in detail as a popular shopping destination among Russian migrants. This paper also looks at online groups for Russian-speaking migrants in Japan that serve as sites for the display and exchange of their material possessions. In these offline and online spaces, -mi grants search for ways to affectively reenact the materiality and accompanying sensations of their pre-migratory past, while simultaneously interiorizing the material expressions of the host culture. By investigating the connection between migration and materiality through the evocative ethnography approach, this study attempts to explore how the affective turn in social inquiry helps us better capture the multilayeredness of migrant experiences. The processes of procuring, making, and sensing that the migrants are engaged in and the resulting objects function as locales charged with affective forces that enable actors to subdue the displacement they have experienced as a result of migration and try out new meanings and modes of being.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia in Asia—Asia in Russia: Energy, Economics, and Regional Relations Conference Proceedings
    RUSSIA IN ASI A — ASIA IN RUSSIA: ENERGY Russia in Asia—Asia in Russia: Energy, Economics, and Regional Relations , ECONOMICS, AND REGIONAL RELA Conference Proceedings Edited by F. Joseph Dresen TIONS OCCASIONAL P APER #292 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars OCCASIONAL PAPER #292 KENNAN One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW INSTITUTE Washington, DC 20004-3027 Tel. (202) 691-4100 Fax (202) 691-4247 www.wilsoncenter.org/kennan The Kennan Institute is a division of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Through its programs of residential scholarships, meetings, and publications, the Institute encourages scholarship on the successor states to the Soviet Union, embracing a broad range of fields in the social sci- ences and humanities. The Kennan Institute is suppored by contributions from foundations, corporations, individuals, and the United States Government. Kennan Institute Occasional Papers The Kennan Institute makes Occasional Papers available to all those interested. Occasional Papers are submitted by Kennan Institute scholars and visiting speakers. Copies of Occasional Papers and a list of papers currently available can be obtained free of charge by contacting: Occasional Papers Kennan Institute One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20004-3027 (202) 691-4100 This Occasional Paper has been produced with the support of Federal Conference Funds from the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and the Program for Research and Training on Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union of the U.S. Department of State (funded by the Soviet and East European Research and Training Act of 1983, or Title VIII).The Kennan Institute is most grateful for this support.
    [Show full text]