The Exempt Agency Is Eligible for REGULAR EXEMPT As Well As STANDARD EXEMPT
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies. -
A Genealogy of Wildland Firefighters' 10 Standard Fire Orders
Communication Monographs Vol. 74, No. 4, December 2007, pp. 415442 The Story Behind an Organizational List: A Genealogy of Wildland Firefighters’ 10 Standard Fire Orders Jennifer A. Ziegler To invigorate research on the dialectic between lists and stories in communication, this study recommends adding context back to text by focusing on the enduring problems these forms are summoned to solve. A genealogy of one significant organizational list, wildland firefighters’ 10 Standard Fire Orders, shows how a list’s meaning resides less on its face and more in the discourses surrounding it, which can change over time. Vestiges of old meanings and unrelated cultural functions heaped upon a list can lead to conflicts, and can make the list difficult to scrap even when rendered obsolete for its intended purpose. Reconciling these layers of meanings and functions is thus not a technical problem but rather a rhetorical one. Implications for communication research are addressed. Keywords: Organizational Communication; Dialectic of List and Story; Genealogy; Organizational Rhetoric; Wildland Firefighting The guest list. The to-do list. The Ten Commandments. The 12 Steps. The short list of candidates. The pilot’s checklist. A-list celebrities. The FBI’s Most Wanted List. U. S. News & World Report list of Best Colleges and Universities. The Book of Lists. Craisglist.org. Everyday lists like these and others shown in Table 1 play significant roles in our lives, and scholars have begun to study the list and its relationship to communication in a variety of contexts: communication theory (Hawes, 1976), interpersonal Jennifer A. Ziegler (PhD, University of Colorado) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication, Valparaiso University. -
Port of Beaumont
Port of Beaumont Located in Beaumont, Texas, the Port of Beaumont is accessible from the Gulf of Mexico and Intracoastal Waterway via the federally maintained Sabine-Neches Ship Channel. The fifth largest port in the nation in terms of tonnage and the largest commercial military outload port in the United States, the Port of Beaumont specializes in LEGEND breakbulk, liquid bulk, dry bulk, heavy lift, roll-on/roll- BNSF LEGEND UP/SP Trackage Rights Handling Carrier BNSF off (Ro-Ro), bulk grain and project cargoes. In 2018, Haulage Agreement UP/SP Trackage Rights the port handled more than 4.6 million tons of cargo Handling Carrier Port of Haulage Agreement Beaumont from 30 countries on five continents. TERMINAL CAPABILITIES • Harbor: One • Facilities: • Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) #115 • Berths: Eight • 24-hour security and protection • Cranes: • Warehouse and transloading • Harbor mobile crane - 140 metric ton (308,647 lbs.) capacity with extension of 168 ft. • 550,000+ sq. ft. covered storage • A variety of lift machines and mobile cranes • 109,000 sq. ft. warehouse space • Over 90 acres of open storage adjacent to • Depth: 36 ft. - 40 ft. waterfront property • Rail-Served: Single commodity (unit) and mixed freight (manifest) capable • Four railcar unloading systems • Cargo Handled: Agricultural Breakbulk Bulk Heavy Lift Project Cargo Ro-Ro Products (Roll-on/Roll-off) Aaron Matthews, Sales Manager BNSF Railway [email protected] Office: 817-304-8516 Port of Beaumont TERMINAL CAPABILITIES OVERVIEW HARBOR ISLAND MARINE TERMINAL • Depth: 40 ft. • Berth: 1,438 ft. • Facilities: • Transit shed capacity total- 245,000 sq. ft. • Open storage area– 30+ acres • Weather-protected rail loading/unloading within transit sheds • Twin marginal rail tracks extend the full length of the wharf MAIN STREET TERMINAL 1 • Facilities: • Approx. -
2017 Form 3805V
2017 Instructions for Form FTB 3805V Net Operating Loss (NOL) Computation and NOL and Disaster Loss Limitations — Individuals, Estates, and Trusts References in these instructions are to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as of January 1, 2015, and the California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC). General Information For NOLs incurred in taxable years beginning Nonbusiness capital losses and gains are on or after January 1, 2008, California has losses and gains from other than a trade or In general, for taxable years beginning on or extended the NOL carryover period from 10 business. These include sales of stock, metals, after January 1, 2015, California law conforms taxable years to 20 taxable years following the and other appreciable assets as well as any to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as of year of the loss. recognized gain from the sale of your principal January 1, 2015. However, there are continuing For taxable years that began in 2002 and residence. differences between California and federal 2003, California suspended the NOL carryover Business losses: law. When California conforms to federal tax deduction. Taxpayers continued to compute You may deduct business capital losses only law changes, we do not always adopt all of and carryover an NOL during the suspension up to the total of business capital gains and the changes made at the federal level. For period. However, the deduction for disaster any nonbusiness capital gains that remain after more information, go to ftb.ca.gov and search losses was not affected by the NOL suspension deducting nonbusiness capital losses and other for conformity. -
2018 Fire State Aid Amounts
PAID STATUS AS OF NOV. 15, 2018 YOU MUST CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR TO LEARN MORE IF STATUS IS LISTED AS DELAYED 2018 FIRE STATE AID 2018 FIRE SUPPLEMENTAL AID 651-296-2551 or COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT (MINN. STAT., CH. 69) (MINN. STAT., SEC. 423A.022) TOTAL [email protected] NORMAN ADA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT $16,322.02 $3,883.74 $20,205.76 PAID NOV. 15 MOWER ADAMS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT $14,677.75 $3,492.50 $18,170.25 PAID OCT. 1 NOBLES ADRIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT $13,440.16 $3,198.02 $16,638.18 PAID OCT. 1 AITKIN AITKIN FIRE DEPARTMENT $46,494.64 $11,063.17 $57,557.81 PAID OCT. 1 BELTRAMI ALASKA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT $7,060.20 $1,679.94 $8,740.14 PAID OCT. 1 STEARNS ALBANY FIRE DEPARTMENT $21,236.80 $5,053.19 $26,289.99 PAID OCT. 1 FREEBORN ALBERT LEA FIRE DEPARTMENT $72,724.94 $17,304.54 $90,029.48 PAID OCT. 1 WRIGHT ALBERTVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT $54,686.23 $13,012.32 $67,698.55 PAID MAR. 15 ST LOUIS ALBORN FIRE DEPARTMENT $9,884.28 $2,351.92 $12,236.20 PAID OCT. 1 FREEBORN ALDEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT $11,296.32 $2,687.90 $13,984.22 PAID OCT. 1 DOUGLAS ALEXANDRIA FIRE DEPARTMENT $114,223.05 $27,178.81 $141,401.86 PAID OCT. 1 CHISAGO ALMELUND FIRE/RESCUE DEPARTMENT $13,098.12 $3,116.63 $16,214.75 PAID NOV. 15 JACKSON ALPHA FIRE DEPARTMENT $7,060.20 $1,679.94 $8,740.14 PAID OCT. -
River Run Fall 2017
A Publication of the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority Fall 2017 3 / Hydro Repairs Underway 8 / Zebra Mussels 16 / Grant Helps SOLC Constituent Communiqué Building Relationships In its 10-county statutory district, the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority works with a variety of customers for water sales and treatment, wastewater treatment, power sales, recreational undertakings and other services. In conducting those operations, GBRA staff also work closely with elected officials, developers and other constituents to determine their current and future needs and to see how GBRA can help address those needs. The purpose of our efforts is to provide exceptional service for their benefit. We are able to do this by ensuring that GBRA has highly skilled employees who receive relevant training year round. This also includes state licensed operators for the water and wastewater treatment facilities that we own and Ithose that we operate in partnership with customers in our basin. Today, GBRA continues to nurture long-standing relationships with its current customers while building new relationships with new partners. Furthering existing partnerships and addressing a need for a geographic area that lacks certain utilities, GBRA is securing a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) to provide wastewater services to an unincorporated area between New Braunfels and Seguin. GBRA will work in partnership with New Braunfels Utilities and the city of Seguin to provide wholesale wastewater treatment to wastewater that is collected from the new developments that are occurring in this high growth area. GBRA is stepping up to build these relationships because the area is growing and circumstances demand it. -
20-21 Proposed Budget Narrative
FISCAL YEAR 2021 (2020-2021) PROPOSED BUDGET & PLAN OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES JULY 30, 2020 Declarations required by the State of Texas: This budget will raise more revenue from property taxes than last year’s budget by $84,818.16 (3.5 percent) and of that amount $28,997.08 is tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this year. The City of Gatesville proposes to use the increase in the total tax revenue for the purpose of equipment for the additional School Resource Officers and new equipment for the Street Department. This notification statement complies with Texas Local Government Code § 102.005 This budget raises more property tax revenue compared to the previous year’s budget. The Gatesville City Council adopted the budget with the following voting record: City Council Ward 1, Place 1: Vacant City Council Ward 1, Place 2: Randy Hitt City Council Ward 1, Place 3/Mayor Pro-Tem: Meredith Rainer City Council Ward 2, Place 4: William Robinette City Council Ward 2, Place 5: Greg Casey City Council Ward 2, Place 6: Jack Doyle Ordinance 2020-___, dated September __, 2020 This notification statement complies with Texas Local Government Code § 102.007 Information regarding the City’s property tax rate follows: Fiscal Year 2020 (preceding): $0.5600/$100 valuation Fiscal Year 2021 (current): TBD/$100 valuation Fiscal Year 2021: Adopted Rate: $0.TBD/$100 valuation No-New-Revenue Tax Rate: $0.5509/$100 valuation No-New-Revenue Maintenance and Operations Tax Rate: $0.583/$100 valuation Voter Approval Tax Rate: $0.6588/$100 valuation Debt Tax Rate: $0.2399/$100 valuation De Minimis Rate: $0.7602/$100 valuation Total Debt Obligations Secured by Property Taxes: $961,017 CITY MANAGER July 30, 2020 The Honorable Mayor Gary Chumley, Mayor Pro Tem Rainer, and Members of the City Council, I am pleased to submit the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2021 which begins on October 1, 2020 and ends on September 30, 2021. -
Greater Flagstaff Area Community Wildfire
GREATER FLAGSTAFF AREA COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN REVIEW & REVISION May 2012 1 PURPOSE In the summer of 2011, the Greater Flagstaff Forests Partnership (GFFP) and Ponderosa Fire Advisory Council (PFAC) initiated a project to “review” the “Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Flagstaff and Surrounding Communities in tHe Coconino and Kaibab National Forests of Coconino County, Arizona” (CWPP). First approved in 2005, the CWPP review is designed to assess the status of implementation activities and evaluate progress towards desired goals. Although not required per the authorizing legislation (Healthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003 - HFRA), nor by the CWPP itself, this was intended to analyze activity within the CWPP area that addressed goals or was influenced by the plan, and to develop a report for local government and land management agencies on findings - it was not designed to revise the text or intent of the CWPP. Primary emphasis was placed on summarizing treatment activity to date and reviewing the “Improved Protection Capabilities” section included on pages 40-43 of the Plan. INTRODUCTION The Greater Flagstaff Area Community Wildfire Protection Plan was approved by the Arizona State Forester, Coconino County, City of Flagstaff, and Ponderosa Fire Advisory Council (representing local fire departments and fire districts) in January of 2005. Jointly developed by the GFFP and PFAC, the plan covered a 939,736-acre area centered on Flagstaff. Working closely with US Forest Service staff and the NAU Forest Ecosystem Restoration Analysis (Forest ERA) program, the CWPP was designed to address the following Goal, Objectives and Principles (quoted form the CWPP): GOAL To protect Flagstaff and surrounding communities, and associated values and infrastructure, from catastrophic wildfire by means of: a) An educated and involved public, b) Implementation of forest treatment projects designed to reduce wildfire threat and improve long term forest health, in a progressive and prioritized manner, and c) Utilization of FireWise building techniques and principles. -
Gooj~ 7 Guadalupe Appraisal District
GOOJ~ 7 GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT Main Ollice Schertz Substation 3000 N. Austin St 1101 Eibel Rd. Seguin, Texas 78155 Schertz, Texas 78154 (830) 303-3313 (210) 945-9708 Opt 8 (830) 372-2874 (Fax) (877) 254-0888 (Fax) [email protected] C) C z NOTICE OF MEETING {_;:_ >· -0 ... Notice is hereby given that the Guadalupe Appraisal Review Board will I vefuf"' at~00rltJm. on December 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, & 16, 2020 at the Guadalupe Appraisal D1sthct (~flic~300'0' N. Austin Street, Seguin, Texas 78155. j S c...~ Under the authority of Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, the Board, during the course of the meeting covered by this notice, may enter into closed or executive session for any of the fallowing reasons provided the subject to be discussed is on the agenda for the meeting. • For a private consultation with the Board's Attorney with respect to pending or contemplated litigation, settlement offers, or on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas, clearly conflicts with this chapter. (Sec. 551-071) Notwithstanding Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, the Appraisal Review Board shall conduct a hearing that is closed to the public if the property owner or the chief appraiser intends to disclose proprietary or confidential information at the hearing that will assist the review board in determining the protest The review board may hold a closed hearing under this subsection only on a joint motion by the property owner and the chief appraiser. -
2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION
2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS STIP Self-Certification ....................................................................................................................... Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... Transportation Planning Process – Overview ................................................................................. Transportation Conformity Process ................................................................................................. Transportation Plans, Programs, and the NEPA Process ............................................................... Importance of Consistency in Plans and Programs ........................................................................ STIP Content……………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………….. TIP/STIP Page Information ............................................................................................................... STIP Funding ..................................................................................................................................... STIP Financial Plan ........................................................................................................................... Public Involvement ......................................................................................... …………………………….. Acronyms/Glossary .......................................................................................................................... -
Pre-Hospital Emergency Medical Care Study
MANAGEMENT ADVISORY GROUP, INC. MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES Pre-Hospital Emergency Medical Care Study For Travis County, Texas November 4, 2011 PRE -HOSPITAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE STUDY for Travis County, Texas NOVEMBER 4, 2011 MANAGEMENT ADVISORY GROUP , INC . Virginia/DC Area Headquarters 4000 Genesee Place, Suite 205 Lake Ridge, Virginia 22192 Phone: 703.590.7250 Fax: 703.590.0366 Management Advisory Group, Inc. Emergency Medical Care Study MANAGEMENT ADVISORY GROUP, INC. LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONSULTING SERVICES November 4, 2011 Mr. Danny Hobby County Executive, Emergency Services Travis County Dear Mr. Hobby, Please find enclosed a report for the study of pre-hospital emergency medical care (RFS # S110093-EC). We are pleased to have had the opportunity to assist you and the County in this important project. We would like to thank all of the participants in this study. They include County management and staff, ATCEMS management and staff, municipal managers, ESD’s at all levels, and informed and interested citizens who have shared their ideas. MAG’s study team is offering 37 specific recommendations in response to the goals of the original Request for Services. Please feel free to call or email at any time as we move forward in the review of the report. Sincerely, Donald C. Long, Ph.D. Executive Vice President Management Advisory Group, Inc. 4000 Genesee Place, Suite 205 Lake Ridge, VA 22192 (703) 590-7250 or (828) 808-3551 cell [email protected] TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS STUDY OF PRE-HOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE FOR TRAVIS COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Table of Contents Section 1.0 – Scope of Work .......................................................................... -
Appendix B – Fire Department Communications
NIOSH Firefighter Radio Communications APPENDIX B: FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS – EXPERIENCES FROM THE FIELD The information contained in this appendix was gathered from a variety of sources. Much of the information comes from fire department management studies previously undertaken by TriData Corporation. Some information comes from individual fire department annual reports, websites, or other fire department literature. Wherever possible, the information from these studies was verified with the fire department to ensure that the most current data was reflected in this report. TABLE 1: EXPERIENCES FROM THE FIELD – DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW Resident Land Land Fire Population Area1 Area Department Uniformed Communications Jurisdiction 13 (sq. mi) Protected Type Employees System Austin, TX 656,562 252 Urban Career 979 UHF (450 MHz) Urban/ Bellingham, WA 67,171 32 Career 140 VHF Suburban UHF (483-MHz Boston, MA 589,141 48 Urban Career 1,600 Conventional) Boulder, CO Rural Suburban/ 8 FTE; VHF 18,000 25 Combination Fire Department Rural 35 Volunteer (153–155-MHz) Suburban/ 9 FTE; UHF (400/800 MHz Brighton, CO 20,905 17 Combination Rural 60 Volunteers Trunked) UHF (800 MHz Charlotte, NC 540,828 242 Urban Career 890 Trunked) Chicago, IL 2,896,016 227 Urban Career 4,000 VHF (Conventional) Urban/ 1,300 Career; UHF (800 MHz Clark County, NV 1,375,675 8,000 Combination 14 Rural 400 Volunteer Trunked) Dallas, TX 1,188,580 385 Urban Career 1,700 UHF (400 MHz) Detroit, MI 951,270 139 Urban Career 1,296 UHF (400 MHz) Urban/ Everett, WA 91,488 48 Career