DOCSLIB.ORG

IUCN Red Data Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IUCN Red Data Book FAQ IUCN Red Data Book Discuss IUCN Red List of Threatened Species ? Founded in 1965, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (also known as the IUCN Red List or Red Data List), has evolved to become the world's most comprehensive inventory of the global conservation status of biological species. It uses a set of criteria to evaluate the extinction risk of thousands of species and subspecies. These criteria are relevant to all species and all regions of the world, With its strong scientific base, the IUCN Red List is recognized as the most authoritative guide to the status of biological diversity. A series of Regional Red List are produced by countries or organizations, which assess the risk of extinction to species within a political management unit. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (1996), the formally stated goals of the Red List are 1. to provide scientifically based information on the status of species and subspecies at a global level, 2. to draw attention to the magnitude and importance of threatened biodiversity, 3. to influence national and international policy and decision-making, and 4. to provide information to guide actions to conserve biological diversity. What are the major categories of species are mentioned in Red book by IUCN ? 1. Extinct (EX) - A taxon is Extinct when there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. 2. Extinct in Wild (EW) - A taxon is Extinct in the Wild when it is known only to survive in cultivation, in captivity or as a naturalized population (or populations) well outside the past range. 3. Critically Endangered (CR) - A taxon is Critically Endangered when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the criteria A to E for Critically Endangered and it is therefore considered to be facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild. 4.Endangered (EN) – A taxon is endangered when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the criteria A to E for Endangered, and it is therefore considered to be facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild. 5.Vulnerable (VU) - A taxon is Vulnerable when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the criteria A to E for Vulnerable, and it is therefore considered to be facing a high risk of extinction in the wild. 6.Near Threatned (NT)- A taxon is Near Threatened when it has been evaluated against the criteria but does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable now, but is close to qualifying for or is likely to qualify for a threatened category in the near future. 7.Least Concern (LC)- A taxon is Least Concern when it has been evaluated against the criteria and does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable or Near Threatened. 8.Data Deficient (DD) – A taxon is Data Deficient when there is inadequate information to make a direct, or indirect, assessment of its risk of extinction based on its distribution and/or population status. 9.Not Evaluated (NE)- A taxon is Not Evaluated when it is has not yet been evaluated against the criteria. What criteria does mention for Critically Endangered Species ? A. Reduction in population size – 1. Reduction of population ≥ 90% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the causes of the reduction are clearly reversible AND understood AND ceased. 2. Reduction of population ≥ 80% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible. B. Geographic range in the form of either B1 (extent of occurrence) OR B2 (area of occupancy)- B.1. Extent of occurrence estimated to be less than 100 km2, and estimates indicating severely fragmented or known to exist at only a single location. B.2.Area of occupancy estimated to be less than 10 km2, and severely fragmented or known to exist at only a single location. C. Population size estimated to number fewer than 250 mature individuals and an estimated continuing decline of at least 25% within three years or one generation, whichever is longer. D. Population size estimated to number fewer than 50 mature individuals. E. Quantitative analysis showing the probability of extinction in the wild is at least 50% within 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer (up to a maximum of 100 years). Discuss the criteria for Endangered Species ? A. Reduction in population size based on any of the following - 1. Reduction in population ≥ 70% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the causes of the reduction are clearly reversible AND understood AND ceased. 2. An observed, estimated, inferred or suspected population size reduction of ≥ 50% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible. B. Geographic range in the form of either B1 (extent of occurrence) OR B2 (area of occupancy) OR both: B.1. Extent of occurrence estimated to be less than 5000 km2, and severely fragmented or known to exist at no more than five locations. B.2. Area of occupancy estimated to be less than 500 km2, and severely fragmented or known to exist at no more than five locations. C. Population size estimated to number fewer than 2500 mature individuals and an estimated continuing decline of at least 20% within five years or two generations, whichever is longer. D. Population size estimated to number fewer than 250 mature individuals. E. Quantitative analysis showing the probability of extinction in the wild is at least 20% within 20 years or five generations, whichever is the longer. Discuss the criteria for Vulnerable Species ? A.Reduction in population size based on any of the following: 1.Reduction in population ≥ 50% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the causes of the reduction are: clearly reversible AND understood AND ceased. 2.Reduction of population ≥ 30% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible. B.Geographic range in the form of either B1 (extent of occurrence) OR B2 (area of occupancy) OR both: B.1. Extent of occurrence estimated to be less than 20,000 km2, and severely fragmented or known to exist at no more than 10 locations. B.2. Area of occupancy estimated to be less than 2000 km2, and estimates indicating severely fragmented or known to exist at no more than 10 locations. C. Population size estimated to number fewer than 10,000 mature individuals and an estimated continuing decline of at least 10% within 10 years or three generations, whichever is longer. D. Population size estimated to number fewer than 1000 mature individuals. E. Quantitative analysis showing the probability of extinction in the wild is at least 10% within 100 years. Enumerate the species by their categories in IUCN? Extinct - Atlas bear, Aurochs, Bali Tiger, Blackfin Cisco, Caribbean Monk Seal, Carolina Parakeet, Caspian Tiger, Dinosaurs, Dodo, Dusky Seaside Sparrow, Elephant Bird, Golden Toad, Great Auk, Haast's Eagle, Japanese Sea Lion, Javan Tiger, Labrador Duck, Moa, Passenger Pigeon, Pterosaurs, Saber-toothed cat, Schomburgk's deer, Short-faced bear, Steller's Sea Cow, Thylacine, Toolache Wallaby, Western Black Rhinoceros, Woolly Mammoth, Woolly Rhinoceros. Extinct in the Wild- captive individuals survive, but there is no free-living, natural population. Examples: Barbary Lion (maybe extinct), Catarina Pupfish, Hawaiian Crow, Northern White Rhinoceros, Scimitar Oryx, Socorro Dove, Wyoming Toad Critically Endangered- It faces an extremely high risk of extinction in the immediate future. Examples: Addax, African Wild Ass, Alabama Cavefish, Amur Leopard, Arakan Forest Turtle, Asiatic Cheetah, Axolotl, Bactrian Camel, Brazilian Merganser, Brown Spider Monkey, California Condor, Chinese Alligator, Chinese Giant Salamander, Gharial, Hawaiian Monk Seal, Iberian Lynx, Island Fox, Javan Rhino, Kakapo, Leatherback Sea Turtle, Mediterranean Monk Seal, Mexican Wolf, Mountain Gorilla, Philippine Eagle, Red Wolf, Saiga, Siamese Crocodile, Spix's Macaw, Southern bluefin tuna, Sumatran Orangutan, Sumatran Rhinoceros, Vaquita, Yangtze River Dolphin. Endangered- It faces a very high risk of extinction in the near future. Examples: African Penguin, African Wild Dog, Asian Elephant, Asiatic Lion, Blue Whale, Bonobo, Bornean Orangutan, Chimpanzees, Dhole, Ethiopian Wolf, Hispid Hare, Giant Otter, Giant Panda, Goliath Frog, Gorillas, Green Sea Turtle, Grevy's Zebra, Hyacinth Macaw, Japanese Crane, Lear's Macaw, Malayan Tapir, Markhor, Persian Leopard, Proboscis Monkey, Pygmy Hippopotamus, Red-breasted Goose, Rothschild Giraffe, Snow Leopard, Steller's Sea Lion, Scopas tang, Takhi, Tiger, Vietnamese Pheasant, Volcano Rabbit, Wild Water Buffalo Vulnerable- It faces a high risk of extinction in the medium-term. Examples: African Elephant, American paddlefish, Clouded Leopard, Cheetah, Dugong, Far Eastern Curlew, Fossa, Galapagos Tortoise, Gaur, Blue-eyed cockatoo, Golden Hamster, Whale Shark, Crowned Crane, Hippopotamus, Humboldt Penguin, Indian Rhinoceros, Komodo Dragon, Lesser White-fronted Goose, Lion, Mandrill, Maned Sloth, Mountain Zebra, Polar Bear, Red Panda, Sloth Bear, Takin, Yak Near Threatened: These species may be considered threatened in the near future. Examples: African Grey Parrot, American Bison, starry blenny,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Iberian Lynx Lynx Pardinus Conservation Breeding Program A
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital.CSIC The Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus Conservation Breeding Program A. VARGAS1, I. SA´ NCHEZ2, F. MARTI´NEZ1, A. RIVAS1, J. A. GODOY3, E. ROLDA´ N4, M. A. SIMO´ N5, R. SERRA6, MaJ. PE´ REZ7, C. ENSEN˜ AT8, M. DELIBES3, M. AYMERICH9, 10 11 A. SLIWA & U. BREITENMOSER 1Centro de Cr´ıa de Lince Ibe´rico El Acebuche, Parque Nacional de Don˜ ana, Huelva, Spain, 2Zoobota´ nico de Jerez, Ca´ diz, Spain, 3Don˜ ana Biological Station, CSIC, Sevilla, Spain, 4National Museum of Natural Science, CSIC, Madrid, Spain, 5Environmental Council, Andalusian Government, Jae´ n, Spain, 6Investigac¸a˜ o Veterina´ ria Independente, Lisbon, Portugal, 7Centro de Cr´ıa en Cautividad de Lince Ibe´rico La Olivilla, Jaen, Spain, 8Parc Zoolo´ gic, Barcelona, Spain, 9Direccio´ n General para la Biodiversidad, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, Spain, 10Cologne Zoo, Cologne 50735, Germany, and 11IUCN Cat Specialist Group, Institute of Veterinary Virology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] The Iberian Lynx Conservation Breeding Program fol- INTRODUCTION lows a multidisciplinary approach, integrated within the National Strategy for the Conservation of the Iberian lynx, which is carried out in cooperation with national, Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus wild populations regional and international institutions. The main goals of have undergone a constant regression through- the ex situ conservation programme are to: (1) maintain a out the last century. The decline has been genetically and demographically managed captive popu- especially abrupt in the last 20 years, with more lation; (2) create new Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus free- ranging populations through re-introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Endangered species From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Contents For other uses, see Endangered species (disambiguation). Featured content "Endangered" redirects here. For other uses, see Endangered (disambiguation). Current events An endangered species is a species which has been categorized as likely to become Random article Conservation status extinct . Endangered (EN), as categorized by the International Union for Conservation of Donate to Wikipedia by IUCN Red List category Wikipedia store Nature (IUCN) Red List, is the second most severe conservation status for wild populations in the IUCN's schema after Critically Endangered (CR). Interaction In 2012, the IUCN Red List featured 3079 animal and 2655 plant species as endangered (EN) Help worldwide.[1] The figures for 1998 were, respectively, 1102 and 1197. About Wikipedia Community portal Many nations have laws that protect conservation-reliant species: for example, forbidding Recent changes hunting , restricting land development or creating preserves. Population numbers, trends and Contact page species' conservation status can be found in the lists of organisms by population. Tools Extinct Contents [hide] What links here Extinct (EX) (list) 1 Conservation status Related changes Extinct in the Wild (EW) (list) 2 IUCN Red List Upload file [7] Threatened Special pages 2.1 Criteria for 'Endangered (EN)' Critically Endangered (CR) (list) Permanent link 3 Endangered species in the United
    [Show full text]
  • The Return of the Iberian Lynx to Portugal: Local Voices Margarida Lopes-Fernandes1,2* , Clara Espírito-Santo3,4 and Amélia Frazão-Moreira2
    Lopes-Fernandes et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:3 DOI 10.1186/s13002-017-0200-9 RESEARCH Open Access The return of the Iberian lynx to Portugal: local voices Margarida Lopes-Fernandes1,2* , Clara Espírito-Santo3,4 and Amélia Frazão-Moreira2 Abstract Background: Ethnographic research can help to establish dialog between conservationists and local people in reintroduction areas. Considering that predator reintroductions may cause local resistance, we assessed attitudes of different key actor profiles to the return of the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) to Portugal before reintroduction started in 2015. We aimed to characterize a social context from an ethnoecological perspective, including factors such as local knowledge, perceptions, emotions, and opinions. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews (n = 131) in three different protected areas and observed practices and public meetings in order to describe reintroduction contestation, emotional involvement with the species, and local perceptions about conservation. Detailed content data analysis was undertaken and an open-ended codification of citations was performed with the support of ATLAS.ti. Besides the qualitative analyses, we further explored statistic associations between knowledge and opinions and compared different geographical areas and hunters with non-hunters among key actors. Results: Local ecological knowledge encompassed the lynx but was not shared by the whole community. Both similarities and differences between local and scientific knowledge about the lynx were found. The discrepancies with scientific findings were not necessarily a predictor of negative attitudes towards reintroduction. Contestation issues around reintroduction differ between geographical areas but did not hinder an emotional attachment to the species and its identification as a territory emblem.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Species List Spain
    THREATENED SPECIES LIST SPAIN Threatened species included in the national inventory of the Ministry of MARM and/or in the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) that are or may be inhabited in the areas of our Hydro Power Stations. 6 CRITIC ENDANGERED SPECIES (CR) GROUP SPECIE COMMON NAME CATEGORY (MARM) (IUCN) Birds Neophron percnopterus Egyptian Vulture CR EN Botaurus stellaris Great Bittern CR LC Mammals Lynx pardinus Iberian Lynx CR CR Ursus arctos Brown Bear CR (Northern Spain) LC Invertebrates Belgrandiella galaica Gastropoda CR No listed Macromia splendens Splendid Cruiser CR VU 24 ENDANGERED SPECIES (EN) GROUP SPECIE COMMON NAME CATEGORY (MARM) (IUCN) Amphibians Rana dalmatina Agile Frog EN LC Birds Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax Chough EN LC Hieraaetus fasciatus Bonelli´s Eagle EN LC Alectoris rufa Barbary Partridge EN LC Parus caeruleus Blue Tit EN LC Tyto alba Barn Owl EN LC Burhinus oedicnemus Stone Curlew EN LC Corvus corax Common Raven EN LC Chersophilus duponti Dupont´s Lark EN NT Milvus milvus Red Kite EN NT Aquila adalberti Spanish Imperial Eagle EN VU Cercotrichas galactotes Alzacola EN LC Reptiles Algyroides marchi Spanish Algyroides EN EN Emys orbicularis European Pond Turtle EN NT Mammals Rhinolophus mehelyi Mehely´s Horseshoe Bat EN VU Mustela lutreola European Mink EN EN Myotis capaccinii Long –Fingered bat EN VU Freshwater fish Salaria fluviatilis Freshwater blenny EN LC Chondrostoma turiense Madrija (Endemic) EN EN Cobitis vettonica Colmilleja del Alagón EN EN (Endemic) Invertebrates Gomphus
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Action Plan for the Iberian Lynx in Portugal
    Conservation Action Plan for the Iberian Ly nx in Portugal -propousal- Contents 1.Introduction................................................................................................................... 4 Ministério das Cidades, 1.1Action plan objectives........................................................................................... 4 Ordenamento do Território e 1.2 Support................................................................................................................. 4 Ambiente 1.3 Document updating.............................................................................................. 5 2. Base line status……...................................................................................................... 6 3.Overview on Iberian lynx ecology............................................................................... 7 Instituto da Conservação da 4.Threat factors............................................................................................................... 9 Natureza 5.Past and present situation in distinct nuclei.............................................................. 10 5.1Central western mountains..................................................................................... 10 5.2 Guadiana Valley.................................................................................................... 12 5.3Algarve-Odemira- Sado.......................................................................................... 13 5.4 Global situation of Iberian lynx in Portugal.........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Felidae Red List of Threatened Species
    conservation process wherever outside facilitation is considered Signed by important. • The Co-Chairs of the IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group: We thank the Junta de Andalucía for the hospitality in Andújar. Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten and Urs Breitenmoser; and The Andújar seminar took place in a very open-minded and self- critical spirit, demonstrating the eagerness of all participants to • members present of the Core Group: Sarah Christie, Peter co-operate for the sake of the lynx. We hope that this spirit can be Crawshaw, Rodney Jackson, Thomas McCarthy, Laurie put into conservation action, and that Andújar will be remem- Marker, Michael G. Mills, Dale Miquelle, Kristin Nowell, James bered as the turning point in recovering the Iberian lynx from the Sanderson. brink of extinction. Andújar, Spain, 1 November 2002 Revision of the Felidae Red List of Threatened Species by Kristin Nowell, IUCN/SSC Red List Felidae Authority* he original system of evaluating species sta- rangewide quantitative extinction risk analyses (E) have been tus, in use up to 1994, classified species as carried out (Ferreras et al 2001, Rodriguez et al 2002). I wanted to TExtinct, Endangered, Vulnerable, Rare, Inde- avoid the category Data Deficient, following the new guidelines terminate or Insufficiently Known. These category stating that this category was to be assigned only when data are definitions were largely subjective; for example, the so uncertain that any category of threat is plausible (IUCN 2001: 25). However, for most species quantitative range-wide data is definition of Endangered in 1993 was: “Taxa in dan- lacking for species population size (C) and rate of change (A), the ger of extinction and whose survival is unlikely if the remaining two criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Iberian Lynx 1 Iberian Lynx
    Iberian Lynx 1 Iberian Lynx Iberian Lynx Conservation status [1] Critically Endangered (IUCN 3.1) Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Carnivora Family: Felidae Genus: Lynx Species: L. pardinus Binomial name Lynx pardinus (Temminck, 1827) 1980 range map Iberian Lynx 2 2003 range map The Iberian lynx, Lynx pardinus, is a critically endangered species native to the Iberian Peninsula in Southern Europe. It is one of the most endangered cat species in the world.[2] According to the conservation group SOS Lynx, if this species died out, it would be one of the few feline extinctions since the Smilodon 10,000 years ago.[3] The species used to be classified as a subspecies of the Eurasian Lynx (Lynx lynx), but is now considered a separate species. Both species occurred together in central Europe in the Pleistocene epoch, being separated by habitat choice.[4] The Iberian lynx is believed to have evolved from Lynx issiodorensis.[5] Description In most respects, the Iberian lynx resembles other species of lynx, with a short tail, tufted ears and a ruff of fur beneath the chin. While the Eurasian Lynx bears rather pallid markings, the Iberian lynx has distinctive, leopard-like spots with a coat that is often light grey or various shades of light brownish-yellow. The coat is also noticeably shorter than in other lynxes, which are typically adapted to colder environments.[6] Some western populations were spotless, although these have recently become extinct. The head and body length is 85 to 110 centimetres (33 to 43 in), with the short tail an additional 12 to 30 centimetres (4.7 to 12 in); the shoulder height is 60 to 70 centimetres (24 to 28 in).
    [Show full text]
  • Hippobosca Longipennis, the Dog Fly, Is a Blood-Sucking Parasite Found Mainly Longipennis on Carnivores
    Hippobosca Importance Hippobosca longipennis, the dog fly, is a blood-sucking parasite found mainly longipennis on carnivores. Its bites can be painful and irritating, although not all animals appear to be bothered. Heavy parasite burdens can occur on some animals: in one case, 180 Dog Fly, specimens were found on a single captive cheetah. Extensive blood loss might be Louse Fly, possible. H. longipennis is an intermediate host for Dipetalonema dracunculoides, a filarial parasite of dogs and hyenas. It may also be a vector or transport host for Blind-fly other pathogens. Species Affected Carnivores are the preferred hosts, as well as the only effective breeding hosts. H. Last Updated: September 2009 longipennis has been found on a wide variety of carnivores including cheetahs, lions, leopards, lynx, servals, African wild cats (Felis silvestris libyca), African civets (Civettictis civetta), hyenas, dholes (Canis adjustus), jackals, African wild dogs (Lycaeon pictus), foxes, badgers, mongooses and domesticated dogs and cats. There have been occasional reports of infestations on other species including roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), antelopes, livestock, humans and a bird; it is uncertain whether all of these parasites were correctly identified. Geographic Distribution H. longipennis seems to be adapted best to warmer areas, and its distribution seems to be limited by low temperatures and high humidity. This fly appears to have originated in Africa, where it is widespread in all but the more humid western and central regions. It can also be found in suitable habitats in much of the European and Asian Palearctic Region south of about 45º north latitude. H. longipennis is occasionally reported from countries on the fringes of this range (e.g., Ireland, Germany, Poland, Taiwan and Japan).
    [Show full text]
  • WILDLIFE in a CHANGING WORLD an Analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™
    WILDLIFE IN A CHANGING WORLD An analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ Edited by Jean-Christophe Vié, Craig Hilton-Taylor and Simon N. Stuart coberta.indd 1 07/07/2009 9:02:47 WILDLIFE IN A CHANGING WORLD An analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ first_pages.indd I 13/07/2009 11:27:01 first_pages.indd II 13/07/2009 11:27:07 WILDLIFE IN A CHANGING WORLD An analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ Edited by Jean-Christophe Vié, Craig Hilton-Taylor and Simon N. Stuart first_pages.indd III 13/07/2009 11:27:07 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily refl ect those of IUCN. This publication has been made possible in part by funding from the French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Red List logo: © 2008 Copyright: © 2009 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Vié, J.-C., Hilton-Taylor, C.
    [Show full text]
  • The IUCN/SSC Red List Assessment, Reintroduction Guidelines and the Iberian Lynx Applying the Red List Criteria to Define a Recovery Strategy for the Iberian Lynx
    The IUCN/SSC Red List Assessment, Reintroduction Guidelines and the Iberian Lynx Applying the Red List criteria to define a recovery strategy for the Iberian lynx Urs Breitenmoser, Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten, José Garcia Santiago & Fridolin Zimmermann The Red List of the Species Survival Commission of the World Conservation Union (IUCN) is the world’s leading authority to judge the conservation status of animal and plant species. Species are classified according to a sincere assessment of the status of the population(s) into categories of increasing threat of extinction. As the first cat species ever, the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) was up-listed into “Critically Endangered” in 2002. The Red List assessment, analysing the status of a species, can also be considered when developing conservation strategies, as it classifies a species according to a complex list of biological criteria. These criteria allow illustrating different possible recovery scenarios and can therefore be used to develop a basic recovery strategy. 1. The „Red List“ history of the Iberian lynx The IUCN/SSC Red List aims for a continuous survey of the status of the world’s animal and plant species. The specialist groups with their members in the range countries assess the status of threatened species yearly, and classify them according to a hierarchical system of threat levels. The Iberian lynx has already in the first assessment in 1986 been classified Endangered (Table 1). However, already an earlier assessment by Scott (1965) – then still classified as subspecies pardina of the species Felis lynx – judged the Iberian lynx to be endangered. In the year 2002, after the newest monitoring efforts revealed a considerable lower number of lynx than previous surveys, the Cat Specialist Group up- listed the Iberian lynx to Critically Endangered, the first cat species ever.
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Conservation Risks of Roads on Apex Predators
    Severe Conservation Risks of Roads on Apex Predators Itxaso Quintana ( [email protected] ) Biodiversity and Development Institute Edgar Fernando Cifuentes University of Cambridge Conservation Research Institute Jeffrey A. Dunnink Panthera Corporation Maria Ariza University of Oslo Daniela Martinez-Medina Fundación Reserva Natural La Palmita, Grupo de Investigaciones Territoriales para el Uso y Conservación de la Biodiversidad Felipe M. Fantacini Instituto Ambiental Brüderthal, IAB Bibek Raj Shrestha Global Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies (GIIS) Freddie-Jeanne Richard University of Poitiers Research Article Keywords: ecosystem, potential impact, global expansion, apex predator conservation Posted Date: April 15th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-415227/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Severe conservation risks of roads on apex predators Quintana I.1,2,*,†, Cifuentes E.F.1,3,4,*,†, Dunnink J.A.1,5,*,†, Ariza M.1,6, Martinez-Medina D.1,7, Fantacini F. M.1,8, Shrestha B.R.1,9, Richard F-J.1 1Université de Poitiers, Département Biologie des Organismes et des Populations, Poitiers, France 2Biodiversity and Development Institute, Unit 4, Gunner's Park, Epping 1, Cape Town 7460, South Africa 3Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge Conservation Research Institute, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK 4Laboratorio de Ecología de Bosques Tropicales y Primatología (LEBTYP), Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1 Nº 18A - 12, Bogotá, Colombia 5Panthera, 8 West 40th Str. New York, NY, USA. 10018 6Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway 7Fundación Reserva Natural La Palmita, Centro de Investigación, Grupo de Investigaciones Territoriales para el Uso y Conservación de la Biodiversidad, Bogotá, Colombia 8Instituto Ambiental Brüderthal, IAB, 88353-190, Brusque/SC, Brazil 9Global Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies (GIIS), P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpestes Ichneumon – Large Grey Mongoose
    Herpestes ichneumon – Large Grey Mongoose there are no major threats, and it is present in a number of protected areas within the assessment region. This species seems to be very adaptable, occupying a large range of habitats in its wide distribution range, but it might be more specialised in the assessment region, possibly as a result of intraguild competition and predation pressure. Because this species is often associated with riparian habitats and wetlands, we therefore recommend monitoring in areas where development may be affecting water supply and/or quality, to determine potential negative impacts on this mongoose through changes in understorey vegetation (for cover) and possibly food availability. Gregg & Des Darling Regional population effects: The Large Grey Mongoose can disperse across regional borders between South Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern Africa and Mozambique, as its range is continuous across much of southeast Africa and this species is not National Red List status (2004) Least Concern constrained by fences. Considering that this mongoose Reasons for change No change has generally not been recorded very far inland (see Figure 1), it is, however, possible that dispersal and Global Red List status (2016) Least Concern movements are at least partially dependent upon the TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None presence of water corridors – and related (understorey) vegetation – such as permanent and seasonal rivers and CITES listing None streams, dam networks or wetlands. Endemic No Distribution The Large Grey Mongoose is largely unaffected by the venom of at least some snake species. The Large Grey Mongoose is found mainly in sub-Saharan Barchan et al.
    [Show full text]