DOCSLIB.ORG

Optics and Interferometry with Atoms and Molecules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Optics and Interferometry with Atoms and Molecules Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Cronin, Alexander D., Jörg Schmiedmayer, and David E. Pritchard. “Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules.” Reviews of Modern Physics 81.3 (2009): 1051. © 2009 The American Physical Society As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1051 Publisher American Physical Society Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/52372 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, VOLUME 81, JULY–SEPTEMBER 2009 Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules Alexander D. Cronin* Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA Jörg Schmiedmayer† Atominstitut Österreichischen Universitäten, TU-Wien, Austria David E. Pritchard‡ Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA ͑Published 28 July 2009͒ Interference with atomic and molecular matter waves is a rich branch of atomic physics and quantum optics. It started with atom diffraction from crystal surfaces and the separated oscillatory fields technique used in atomic clocks. Atom interferometry is now reaching maturity as a powerful art with many applications in modern science. In this review the basic tools for coherent atom optics are described including diffraction by nanostructures and laser light, three-grating interferometers, and double wells on atom chips. Scientific advances in a broad range of fields that have resulted from the application of atom interferometers are reviewed. These are grouped in three categories: ͑i͒ fundamental quantum science, ͑ii͒ precision metrology, and ͑iii͒ atomic and molecular physics. Although some experiments with Bose-Einstein condensates are included, the focus of the review is on linear matter wave optics, i.e., phenomena where each single atom interferes with itself. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1051 PACS number͑s͒: 03.75.Be, 03.75.Dg, 37.25.ϩk, 03.75.Pp CONTENTS III. Atom Interferometers 1067 A. Introduction 1067 1. General design considerations 1067 I. Introduction 1052 2. White light interferometetry 1067 A. Interferometers for translational states 1052 3. Types and categories 1068 B. Preparation, manipulation, and detection 1053 B. Three-grating interferometers 1069 C. Scientific promise of atom interferometers 1054 1. Mechanical gratings 1069 II. Atom Diffraction 1055 2. Interferometers with light gratings 1070 A. Early diffraction experiments 1055 3. Time-domain and contrast interferometers 1071 B. Nanostructures 1055 4. Talbot-Lau ͑near-field͒ interferometer 1072 1. Transmission gratings 1056 C. Interferometers with path-entangled states 1073 2. Young’s experiment with atoms 1057 1. Optical Ramsey-Bordé interferometers 1073 3. Charged-wire interferometer 1057 2. Raman interferometry 1074 4. Zone plates 1057 D. Longitudinal interferometry 1075 5. Atom holography 1058 1. Stern-Gerlach interferometry 1075 C. Gratings of light 1058 2. Spin echo 1076 1. Thin gratings: Kapitza-Dirac scattering 1059 3. Longitudinal rf interferometry 1076 2. Diffraction with on-resonant light 1060 4. Stückelberg interferometers 1077 3. Thick gratings: Bragg diffraction 1060 E. Coherent reflection 1077 4. Bloch oscillations 1062 F. Confined atom interferometers with BECs 1077 5. Coherent channeling 1063 1. Interference with guided atoms 1078 D. The Talbot effect 1063 2. Coherent splitting in a double well 1079 E. Time-dependent diffraction 1064 3. Interferometry on atom chips 1080 1. Vibrating mirrors 1064 IV. Fundamental Studies 1081 2. Oscillating potentials 1065 A. Basic questions: How large a particle can interfere? 1081 3. Modulated light crystals 1065 B. Decoherence 1082 F. Summary of diffractive Atom Optics 1066 1. Interference and “welcher-weg” information 1082 G. Other coherent beam splitters 1066 2. Internal state marking 1083 3. Coupling to an environment 1084 a. Decoherence in diffraction 1084 *[email protected] b. Decoherence in Talbot-Lau interferometer 1084 †[email protected] c. Photon scattering in an interferometer 1084 ‡[email protected] d. Scattering from background gas in an 0034-6861/2009/81͑3͒/1051͑79͒ 1051 ©2009 The American Physical Society 1052 Cronin, Schmiedmayer, and Pritchard: Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules interferometer 1084 observed and exploited for scientific gain. Atom inter- 4. Realization of Feynman’s gedanken ferometers are now valuable tools for studying funda- experiment 1085 mental quantum mechanical phenomena, probing 5. Realization of Einstein’s recoiling slit atomic and material properties, and measuring inertial experiment 1087 displacements. C. Origins of phase shifts 1088 In historical perspective, coherent atom optics is an 1. Dynamical phase shifts 1088 extension of techniques that were developed for ma- 2. Aharonov-Bohm and Aharonov-Casher nipulating internal quantum states of atoms. Broadly effects 1089 speaking, at the start of the 20th century atomic beams 3. Berry phase 1090 were developed to isolate atoms from their environ- 4. Inertial displacements 1091 ment; this is a requirement for maintaining quantum co- D. Extended coherence and BECs 1091 herence of any sort. Hanle ͑1924͒ studied coherent su- 1. Atom lasers 1091 perpositions of atomic internal states that lasted for tens 2. Studies of BEC wave functions 1092 of nanoseconds in atomic vapors. But with atomic 3. Many-particle coherence in BECs 1092 beams, Stern-Gerlach magnets were used to select and 4. Coupling two BECs with light 1094 preserve atoms in specific quantum states for several ms. E. Studies with and of BECs 1095 A big step forward was the ability to change atoms’ in- 1. Josephson oscillations 1096 ternal quantum states using rf resonance as demon- 2. Spontaneous decoherence and number strated by Rabi et al. ͑1938͒. Subsequently, long-lived squeezing 1096 coherent superpositions of internal quantum states were 3. Structure studies of BEC 1097 intentionally created and detected by Ramsey ͑1949͒. 4. Dynamics of coherence in 1D systems 1097 The generalization and application of these techniques 5. Measuring noise by interference 1097 has created or advanced many scientific and technical 6. Momentum of a photon in a medium 1098 fields ͑e.g., precise frequency standards, nuclear mag- F. Testing the charge neutrality of atoms 1099 netic resonance spectroscopy, and quantum information V. Precision Measurements 1099 gates͒. A. Gravimeters, gryroscopes, and gradiometers 1099 Applying these ideas to translational motion required B. Newton’s constant G 1101 the development of techniques to localize atoms and C. Tests of relativity 1101 transfer atoms coherently between two localities. In this D. Interferometers in orbit 1102 view, localities in position and momentum are just an- E. Fine structure constant and ប/M 1102 other quantum mechanical degree of freedom analogous VI. Atomic Physics Applications 1104 to discrete internal quantum states. We discuss these co- A. Discovery of He2 molecules 1104 herent atom optics techniques in Sec. II and the interfer- B. Polarizability measurements 1104 ometers that result in Sec. III. Then we discuss applica- 1. Ground-state dc scalar polarizability 1104 tions for atom interferometers in Secs. IV–VI. 2. Transition dc and ac Stark shifts 1106 C. Index of refraction due to dilute gases 1106 ͑ ͒ D. Casimir-Polder atom-surface potentials 1107 A. Interferometers for translational states 1. vdW-modified diffraction 1108 2. Interferometer vdW and CP measurements 1109 “Atom Optics” is so named because coherent manipu- VII. Outlook 1110 lation of atomic motion requires that the atoms be Acknowledgments 1114 treated as waves. Consequently, many techniques to con- References 1114 trol atom waves borrow seminal ideas from light optics. To make atom interferometers the following compo- nents of an optical interferometer must be replicated: I. INTRODUCTION ͑1͒ state selection to localize the initial state ͑gener- ally in momentum space͒; Atom interferometry is the art of coherently manipu- ͑ ͒ lating the translational motion of atoms ͑and molecules͒ 2 coherent splitting, typically using diffraction to together with the scientific advances that result from ap- produce at least two localized maxima of the wave plying this art. We begin by stressing that motion here function with a well-defined relative phase; refers to center of mass displacements and that coher- ͑3͒ free propagation so that interactions can be ap- ently means with respect for ͑and often based on͒ the plied to one “arm,” i.e., one of the two localized phase of the de Broglie wave that represents this mo- components of the wave function; tion. The most pervasive consequence of this coherence ͑ ͒ is interference, and the most scientifically fruitful appli- 4 coherent recombination so that phase informa- cation of this interference is in interferometers. In an tion gets converted back into state populations; interferometer atom waves are deliberately offered the ͑5͒ detection of a specific population, so the relative option of traversing an apparatus via two or more alter- phase of the wave-function components can be de- nate paths and the resulting interference pattern is termined from interference fringes. Rev. Mod. Phys., Vol. 81, No. 3, July–September 2009 Cronin, Schmiedmayer, and Pritchard:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Atom Interferometry in an Optical Cavity by Matthew Jaffe a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements F
    Atom interferometry in an optical cavity by Matthew Jaffe A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Associate Professor Holger Müller, Chair Associate Professor Norman Yao Professor Karl van Bibber Fall 2018 Atom interferometry in an optical cavity Copyright 2018 by Matthew Jaffe 1 Abstract Atom interferometry in an optical cavity by Matthew Jaffe Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Holger Müller, Chair Matter wave interferometry with laser pulses has become a powerful tool for precision measurement. Optical resonators, meanwhile, are an indispensable tool for control of laser beams. We have combined these two components, and built the first atom interferometer inside of an optical cavity. This apparatus was then used to examine interactions between atoms and a small, in-vacuum source mass. We measured the gravitational attraction to the source mass, making it the smallest source body ever probed gravitationally with an atom interferometer. Searching for additional forces due to screened fields, we tightened constraints on certain dark energy models by several orders of magnitude. Finally, we measured a novel force mediated by blackbody radiation for the first time. Utilizing technical benefits of the cavity, we performed interferometry with adiabatic passage. This enabled new interferometer geometries, large momentum transfer, and in- terferometers with up to one hundred pulses. Performing a trapped interferometer to take advantage of the clean wavefronts within the optical cavity, we performed the longest du- ration spatially-separated atom interferometer to date: over ten seconds, after which the atomic wavefunction was coherently recombined and read out as interference to measure gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark G. Raizen Curriculum Vita
    Mark G. Raizen Curriculum Vita Education Ph.D., Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, May 1989. Supervisors: H.J. Kimble (now at Caltech), Steven Weinberg. Graduate studies in Mathematics, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel, 1980-1982. B.Sc., Mathematics with honors, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel, 1980. Work and Professional Experience Sid W. Richardson Foundation Regents Chair in Physics and Professor of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin (2000-) Associate Professor of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin (1996- 2000). Assistant Professor of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin (1991-1996). Postdoctoral Research, in the group of Dr. D. J. Wineland, Time and Frequency Division, NIST, Boulder (1989-1991). Professional Societies and Important Service Member American Physical Society, Optical Society of America, American Chemical Society, and American Association for the Advancement of Science. Chairman, 1999 Max Born Prize Committee, Optical Society of America. Chairman, 1999 A. L. Schawlow Prize Committee, American Physical Society. 1 Member Executive Committee, Division of Laser Science, American Physical Society, 1999-2002. Member, Committee on Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Sciences, National Research Council, Jan. 1, 2000-June 30, 2002. Member, 2001 Rabi Prize Committee. Member Executive Committee, Division of AMO Physics of APS, 2001-2004. Divisonal Associate Editor, Physical Review Letters, 2000-2003. Organizer, New Laser Scientists Conference, Fall 2002. Chair, Division of Laser Science of the American Physical Society (2004-2005). Chair, Nominating Committee, Division of Laser Science, 2009. Member Executive Committee, Topical Group on Precision Measurement & Fundamental Constants of the American Physics Society (2010-2013). Awards and Honors Batsheva de Rothschild Fellow (2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2101.05398V2 [Quant-Ph] 12 Apr 2021 Lcdibtent Oma Tmcrsntr Hscon- Atoms This Additional Resonator
    Single collective excitation of an atomic array trapped along a waveguide: a study of cooperative emission for different atomic chain configurations V.A. Pivovarov,1,2 L.V. Gerasimov,3, 2 J. Berroir,4 T. Ray,4 J. Laurat,4 A. Urvoy,4, ∗ and D.V. Kupriyanov3,2, † 1Physics Department, St.-Petersburg Academic University, Khlopina 8, 194021 St.-Petersburg, Russia 2Center for Advanced Studies, Peter the Great St-Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251, St.-Petersburg, Russia 3Quantum Technologies Center, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskiye Gory 1-35, 119991, Moscow, Russia 4Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, Sorbonne Universit´e, CNRS, ENS-Universit´ePSL, Coll`ege de France, 4 place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France (Dated: April 14, 2021) Ordered atomic arrays trapped in the vicinity of nanoscale waveguides offer original light-matter interfaces, with applications to quantum information and quantum non-linear optics. Here, we study the decay dynamics of a single collective atomic excitation coupled to a waveguide in different configurations. The atoms are arranged as a linear array and only a segment of them is excited to a superradiant mode and emits light into the waveguide. Additional atomic chains placed on one or both sides play a passive role, either reflecting or absorbing this emission. We show that when varying the geometry, such a one-dimensional atomic system could be able to redirect the emitted light, to directionally reduce or enhance it, and in some cases to localize it in a cavity formed by the atomic mirrors bounding the system. I. INTRODUCTION figuration was theoretically explored in [18], with a single atom strategically placed inside a very short atomic res- Developing and harnessing hybrid platforms where neu- onator at one of its anti-nodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Atom Interferometry with Laser-Cooled Lithium by Kayleigh Cassella Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Berkeley Professor Holger M¨Uller,Chair
    Hot Beats and Tune Outs: Atom Interferometry with Laser-cooled Lithium by Kayleigh Cassella A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Holger M¨uller,Chair Professor Dan Stamper-Kurn Professor Jeffrey Bokor Spring 2018 Hot Beats and Tune Outs: Atom Interferometry with Laser-cooled Lithium Copyright 2018 by Kayleigh Cassella 1 Abstract Hot Beats and Tune Outs: Atom Interferometry with Laser-cooled Lithium by Kayleigh Cassella Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Berkeley Professor Holger M¨uller,Chair Ushered forth by advances in time and frequency metrology, atom interferometry remains an indispensable measurement tool in atomic physics due to its precision and versatility. A sequence of four π=2 beam splitter pulses can create either an interferometer sensitive to the atom's recoil frequency when the momentum imparted by the light reverses direction between pulse pairs or, when constructed from pulses without such reversal, sensitive to the perturbing potential from an external optical field. Here, we demonstrate the first atom interferometer with laser-cooled lithium, advantageous for its low mass and simple atomic structure. We study both a recoil-sensitive Ramsey-Bord´einterferometer and interferometry sensitive to the dynamic polarizability of the ground state of lithium. Recoil-sensitive Ramsey-Bord´einterferometry benefits from lithium's high recoil fre- quency, a consequence of its low mass. At an interrogation time of 10 ms, a Ramsey-Bord´e lithium interferometer could achieve sensitivities comparable to those realized at much longer times with heavier alkali atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interferometer for Atoms by David William Keith B.Sc Physics
    1 An Interferometer for Atoms by David William Keith B.Sc Physics, University of Toronto (Nov, 1986) Submitted to the Department of Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May, 1991 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1991 Signature of the Author ______________________________________________ Department of Physics May , 1991 Certified by ________________________________________________________ David E. Pritchard Professor of Physics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by _______________________________________________________ George F. Koster, Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Studies 2 An Interferometer for Atoms by David William Keith Submitted to the Department of Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract We have demonstrated an interferometer for atoms. A three grating geometry is used, resulting in an interferometer of the "amplitude division " type. We used a highly collimated beam of sodium atoms with a de Broglie wavelength of 16 pm and high-quality 0.4 mm-period free-standing gratings. The interference signal is 70 Hz, which allows us to determine the phase to 0.1 rad in 1 min. This is the first atom interferometer in the sense that it simultaneously and distinctly separates the atoms in position and momentum. In order to make the gratings for our interferometer, we have developed a novel method for fabricating free-standing micro-structures. Using this method we have made high-quality 0.2 and 0.4-mm period gratings, as well as the first zone plate lenses to be used for atoms. We have previously reported the first observation of the diffraction of atoms from a fabricated periodic structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Trapping and Manipulation of Laser-Cooled Metastable Argon Atoms at a Surface
    Trapping and Manipulation of Laser-Cooled Metastable Argon Atoms at a Surface Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades des Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Universität Konstanz Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Sektion Fachbereich Physik vorgelegt von Dominik Schneble Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 20. Februar 2002 Referenten: Prof. Dr. T. Pfau Priv.-Doz. Dr. C. Bechinger Prof. Dr. G. Ganteför Abstract This thesis discusses experiments on the all-optical trapping and manipulation of laser- cooled metastable argon atoms at a surface. A magneto-optical surface trap (MOST) has been realized and studied. This novel hybrid trap combines a magneto-optical trap at a metallic surface with an optical evanescent-wave atom mirror. It allows laser-cooling and trapping of atoms in con- tact with an evanescent light field that separates the atomic cloud from the surface by a fraction of an optical wavelength. Based on this work, the continuous loading of a planar matter waveguide has been demonstrated. Loading into the waveguide, which was formed by the optical potential of a red-detuned standing light wave above the surface, was achieved via evanescent- field optical pumping from the MOST in sub-mdistancefromthesurface. In subsequent experiments, several light-induced atom-optical elements have been demonstrated in the planar waveguide geometry, including a continuous atom source, a switchable channel guide, an atom detector and an optical surface lattice. The source, the channel and the detector have been combined to form the first, albeit simple, atom- optical integrated circuit. Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 General Context ............................... 1 1.2 This Thesis .................................. 5 1.3 Outlook ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Momentum Transfer Using Chirped Standing Wave Fields: Bragg Scattering
    Momentum transfer using chirped standing wave fields: Bragg scattering Vladimir S. Malinovsky and Paul R. Berman Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics & FOCUS Center, Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1120 We consider momentum transfer using frequency-chirped standing wave fields. Novel atom-beam splitter and mirror schemes based on Bragg scattering are presented. It is shown that a predeter- mined number of photon momenta can be transferred to the atoms in a single interaction zone. PACS numbers: 03.75.Dg, 32.80.-t, 42.50.Vk Atom optics has experienced rapid advances in recent ing the entire evolution of the atom-field interaction and years. Applications of atom optics to inertial sensing [1], spontaneous emission plays a negligible role. We use atom holography [2, 3] and certain schemes for quantum chirped pulses to produce efficient momentum transfer computing [4, 5] can benefit substantially from the abil- sequentially to states having momentum ±n2~k, where ity to manipulate atomic motion in a controllable way. k is the propagation vector of one of the fields and n is There are a number of theoretical and experimental stud- a positive integer. The chirp rate and pulse duration are ies devoted to this problem [6, 7, 8, 9]. used to control the final target state. This work is com- The underlying physical mechanism responsible for op- plementary to that involving the use of adiabatic rapid tical control of atomic motion is an exchange of momen- passage to accelerate atoms that are trapped in optical tum between the atoms and the fields.
    [Show full text]
  • MATTER WAVE INTERFEROMETRY in the Light of Schridinger's Wave Mechanics
    INIS-mf—11327 ATOMINSTITUT WIEN INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON "SchrBdingtr'i cat* M m qrmbol for the wftrt-putieU dualiim MATTER WAVE INTERFEROMETRY in the Light of Schridinger's Wave Mechanics 14.-16. September 1987, Technical University Vienna Atominstitut der Osterreichischen Universitaten Satellite Workshop to the SCHRODINGER SYMPOSIUM which will be held in Vienna 16.-18. September 1987 on the occasion of the 100th ANNIVERSARY OF E. SCHROWNGER'S BIRTH organized by ATOMINSTmjT DER OSTERREICHISCHEN UNIVERSITATEN iad EftWIN SCHRODINGER SOCIETY urr Tentative Program Abstract Booklet INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON "SchrSdinger'j cat" as a symbol for the wave-particle dualism MATTER WAVE INTERFEROMETRY in the Light of SchrOdinger's Wave Mechanics 14.-16. September 1987, Technical University Vienna Atominstitut der Osterreichischen Universitaten Satellite Workshop to the SCHRODINGER SYMPOSIUM which will be held in Vienna 16.-18. September 1987 on the occasion of the 100th ANNIVERSARY OF E. SCHRODINGER'S BIRTH organized by ATOMINSTITUT DER OSTERREICHISCHEN UNIVERSITATEN and ERWIN SCHRODINGER SOCIETY International Advisory Committee: U.Bonse (Dortmund), I.M.Frank (Dubna), A.G.Klein (Melbourne), D.M.Greenberger (New York), H.Maier-Leibnitz (Munchen), G.MOllenstedt (Tubingen), M.Namiki (Tokyo), CCShull (Cambridge), A.Tonomura (Tokyo), J.-P.Vigier (Paris), S.A.Weraer (Columbia). Organizing Committee: G.Badurek, F.Paschke, H.Rauch (chairman), J.Summhammer, A.Zeilinger Topics: Electron Interferometry Quantum Devices Neutron Interferometry Interpretational
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1806.09958V3 [Physics.Ed-Ph] 1 Aug 2018 1
    Understanding quantum physics through simple experiments: from wave-particle duality to Bell's theorem Ish Dhand,1 Adam D'Souza,2 Varun Narasimhachar,3 Neil Sinclair,4, 5 Stephen Wein,4 Parisa Zarkeshian,4 Alireza Poostindouz,4, 6 and Christoph Simon4, ∗ 1Institut f¨urTheoretische Physik and Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology (IQST), Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, Universit¨atUlm, 89069 Ulm, Germany 2Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N4N1, Alberta, Canada 3School of Physical & Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 21 Nanyang Link Singapore 637371 4Department of Physics and Astronomy and Institute for Quantum Science and Technology (IQST), University of Calgary, Calgary T2N1N4, Alberta, Canada 5Department of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy and Alliance for Quantum Technologies (AQT), California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Blvd., Pasadena, California 91125, USA 6Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N1N4, Alberta, Canada (Dated: August 3, 2018) Quantum physics, which describes the strange behavior of light and matter at the smallest scales, is one of the most successful descriptions of reality, yet it is notoriously inaccessible. Here we provide an approachable explanation of quantum physics using simple thought experiments. We derive all relevant quantum predictions using minimal mathematics, without introducing the advanced calculations that are typically used to describe quantum physics. We focus on the two key surprises of quantum physics, namely wave{particle duality, a term that was introduced to capture the fact that single quantum particles in some respects behave like waves and in other respects like particles, and entanglement, which applies to two or more quantum particles and brings out the inherent contradiction between quantum physics and seemingly obvious assumptions regarding the nature of reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Electron Interferometry: Interferences Between Two Electrons and a Precision Method of Measuring Decoherence
    Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 29, Hors s´erie1, 2004 857 Electron interferometry: Interferences between two electrons and a precision method of measuring decoherence Franz Hasselbach, Harald Kiesel, and Peter Sonnentag Institut f¨urAngewandte Physik, Universit¨atT¨ubingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, D-72076 T¨ubingen,Germany ABSTRACT. Louis de Broglie’s discovery of the wave nature of matter 80 years ago and the subsequent development of quantum mechanics by Erwin Schr¨odinger, Werner Heisenberg and Paul Dirac solved many riddles of those days and determined physics of the whole 20th century. Yet, after this long time, matter wave interferometry is as up to date as it was in 1927 when Louis de Broglie’s hypothesis was verified, e.g., by Davisson and Germer. Atom interferometry, ion interferometry and Bose-Einstein condensates are today’s fascinating applications based on de Broglie’s discovery. The focus of the present contribution are Hanbury Brown-Twiss anti-correlations (i.e. interferences between two fermions (electrons)) and the quantitative observation of decoherence by electron biprism interferometry. P.A.C.S.: 03.75.-b; 05.30.Fk; 03.65.Yz 1 Observation of Hanbury Brown-Twiss anticorrelations in a beam of free electrons The astronomers R. Hanbury Brown and R.Q. Twiss (HBT) were the first to observe in 1956 that the fluctuations in the counting rate of photons originating from uncorrelated point sources become, within the coherently illuminated area, slightly enhanced compared to a random sequence of classical particles [1, 2, 3]. This at a first glance mysterious formation of correlations in the process of propagation turns out to be a consequence of quantum interference between two indistinguishable pho- tons and Bose-Einstein statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Double-Slit Experiment - Physicsworld.Com
    The double-slit experiment - physicsworld.com http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/9745 A website from the Institute of Physics Signed in as ianappelbaum My profile Sign out Contact us The double-slit experiment Share this Sep 1, 2002 E-mail to a friend This article is an extended version of the article “The Connotea double-slit experiment” that appeared in the September CiteUlike 2002 issue of Physics World (p15). It has been further Delicious extended to include three letters about the history of the Digg double-slit experiment with single electrons that were Facebook published in the May 2003 issue of the magazine. Twitter What is the most beautiful experiment in physics? This is the question that Robert Crease asked Physics World readers in May - and more than 200 replied with suggestions as diverse as Schrödinger's cat and the Trinity nuclear test in 1945. The top five Related stories included classic experiments by Galileo, Millikan, Newton and The most beautiful Thomas Young. But uniquely among the top 10, the most beautiful experiment (survey) experiment in physics - Young's double-slit experiment applied to the From the New York Times : interference of single electrons - does not have a name associated Science's 10 most beautiful with it. experiments (abstract only) Most discussions of double-slit experiments with particles refer to The most beautiful Feynman's quote in his lectures: "We choose to examine a experiment (results) phenomenon which is impossible, absolutely impossible, to explain in any classical way, and which has in it the heart of quantum Related links mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Reflection from the Casimir-Polder Potential
    THÈSE DE DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE Spécialité : Physique École doctorale : “Physique en Île-de-France” réalisée au Laboratoire Kastler-Brossel présentée par Gabriel DUFOUR pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE Sujet de la thèse : Réflexion quantique sur le potentiel de Casimir-Polder – Quantum reflection from the Casimir-Polder potential soutenue le 20 novembre 2015 devant le jury composé de M Andreas Buchleitner Rapporteur M David Guéry-Odelin Rapporteur Mme Marie-Christine Angonin Examinatrice M Olivier Dulieu Examinateur M Valery Nesvizhevsky Examinateur Mme Astrid Lambrecht Directrice de thèse i À la mémoire de mes grands-pères, Jean Dufour et Michel Durin ii Quand j’ai poussé la porte du Laboratoire Kastler Brossel en novembre 2011, je re- venais d’un mois de voyage à vélo sur les routes et chemins d’Italie. Astrid Lambrecht et Serge Reynaud m’ont convaincu de me lancer dans une nouvelle aventure, avec son lot d’ascensions ardues, de petites victoires, de problèmes techniques et de découvertes grisantes. Astrid et Serge m’ont accompagné sans relâche au cours du stage et de la thèse qui ont suivi. Je les remercie chaleureusement pour leur gentillesse et leur patience, leurs mots d’encouragement et les nombreuses discussions passionnantes que nous avons eues. Marie-Pascale Gorza, Romain Guérout, Manuel Donaire et Axel Maury ont été mes compagnons de route au sein de l’équipe “fluctuations quantiques et relativité”. Leurs conversations stimulantes et animées ont égayé bien des austères journées de travail. J’ai aussi partagé de très bons moments avec mes collègues et amis du laboratoire et d’au delà, que ce soit dans les courants d’air de la cantine, sous le soleil des arènes ou dans l’ambiance chaleureuse d’une cafétéria.
    [Show full text]