Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Table of Contents Democratic Republic of Congo Environmental Analysis Final Report Submitted to USAID Washington and Kinshasa December 2003 Prepared by the Wildlife Conservation Society TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 DEMOCRATIC REPUBILC OF CONGO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................7 2 PURPOSE AND APPROACH............................................................................................................................14 3 THE CONTEXT OF D.R. C. .............................................................................................................................16 3.1 PHYSICAL ...............................................................................................................................................................16 3.2 BIOLOGICAL ...........................................................................................................................................................18 3.3 SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT....................................................................................................................................20 3.4 THE LEGAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT....................................................................................................................24 3.5 CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT....................................25 3.6 EXISTING LAWS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................................25 3.7 ENFORCEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN DRC .................................................................................................25 3.8 LABOR DIVISION BETWEEN DIFFERENT ADMINISTRATIVE AND TERRITORIAL ENTITIES ...........................................26 3.9 INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND TREATIES SIGNED BY DRC............................................................................27 4 INSTITUTIONAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ...........29 4.1 FEDERAL INSTITUTIONS AND THE MANAGEMENT POLICY .......................................................................................29 4.2 THE ROLE OF MECN IN RELATION TO ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY............................................................................30 4.3 CIVIL SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................31 4.4 PRIVATE SECTOR FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION .........................................31 4.5 UNIVERSITIES .........................................................................................................................................................31 4.6 FINANCIAL BASIS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION........................................................33 5 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS AND THREATS .............................................................................................34 5.1 FRESHWATER, COASTAL, AND MARINE RESOURCES................................................................................................34 5.2 THE CONGO RIVER .................................................................................................................................................37 5.2.1 The upper Congo ...............................................................................................................................................37 5.2.2 The mid Congo...................................................................................................................................................37 5.2.3 The Lower Congo: .............................................................................................................................................39 5.3 THE COASTAL WATERS ..........................................................................................................................................40 5.4 THE LAKES OF DRC ...............................................................................................................................................40 5.4.1 Lake Tanganyika................................................................................................................................................40 5.4.2 Lake Kivu...........................................................................................................................................................41 5.4.3 Lake Edward......................................................................................................................................................41 5.4.4 Lake Albert.........................................................................................................................................................42 5.4.5 Lake Moero........................................................................................................................................................43 5.4.6 Lake Upemba .....................................................................................................................................................43 5.4.7 Lake Tumba .......................................................................................................................................................43 5.4.8 Lake Maindombe................................................................................................................................................44 5.5 AIR QUALITY, URBAN WATER RESOURCES, URBAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. ....................................44 5.5.1 Air Quality .........................................................................................................................................................44 5.5.1.1 Agriculture:................................................................................................................................................................45 5.5.1.2 Transportation-related air pollution:..........................................................................................................................45 5.5.1.3 Industry:.....................................................................................................................................................................45 5.5.1.4 Mining: ......................................................................................................................................................................45 5.5.1.5 Oil extraction:............................................................................................................................................................46 5.5.2 Urban water resources: .....................................................................................................................................46 WCS. Democratic Republic of Congo Environmental Analysis (USAID) 1 5.5.3 Urban environment management: .....................................................................................................................46 5.5.3.1 Sanitation systems: ....................................................................................................................................................47 5.5.3.2 Municipal solid waste:...............................................................................................................................................47 5.5.3.3 Industrial Waste:........................................................................................................................................................48 5.5.4 Mining: ..............................................................................................................................................................49 5.5.4.1 Environmental impacts of mining..............................................................................................................................49 5.5.4.2 New legal framework for environmental management of the mining sector: ............................................................52 5.5.5 Energy: ..............................................................................................................................................................53 5.5.5.1 Electricity ..................................................................................................................................................................53 5.5.5.2 Wood .........................................................................................................................................................................53 5.5.5.3 Crude oil production:.................................................................................................................................................53 5.6 STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY .......................................................................................................................................56 5.6.1 Natural ecosystems ............................................................................................................................................56 5.6.1.1 Range of ecosystems: ................................................................................................................................................56 5.6.2 Agricultural sector.............................................................................................................................................57 5.6.2.1 Agricultural
Recommended publications
  • EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)
    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Editors: Dr Jeroen Stevens Contact information: Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp – K. Astridplein 26 – B 2018 Antwerp, Belgium Email: [email protected] Name of TAG: Great Ape TAG TAG Chair: Dr. María Teresa Abelló Poveda – Barcelona Zoo [email protected] Edition: First edition - 2020 1 2 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (February 2020) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA APE TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications, and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analysed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonobo Conservation Assessment
    Bonobo Conservation Assessment November 21-22, 1999 Kyoto University Primate Research Institute Inuyama, Japan Workshop Report Sally Coxe, Norm Rosen, Philip Miller and Ulysses Seal, editors A Contribution of the Workshop Participants and The Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (IUCN / SSC) A contribution of the workshop participants and the IUCN / SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group. Cover photo ©Frans Lanting Section divider photos: Sections I, V courtesy of Sally Coxe Sections II – IV, VI ©Frans Lanting Coxe, S., N. Rosen, P.S. Miller, and U.S. Seal. 2000. Bonobo Conservation Assessment Workshop Final Report. Apple Valley, MN: Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (SSC/IUCN). Additional copies of the publication can be ordered through the IUCN / SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124 USA. Fax: 612-432-2757. Send checks for US$35 (for printing and shipping costs) payable to CBSG; checks must be drawn on a US bank. The CBSG Conservation Council These generous contributors make the work of CBSG possible $50,000 and above Gladys Porter Zoo Ouwehands Dierenpark Hong Kong Zoological and Riverbanks Zoological Park Chicago Zoological Society Botanical Gardens Wellington Zoo -Chairman Sponsor Japanese Association of Zoological Wildlife World Zoo SeaWorld/Busch Gardens Gardens and Aquariums (JAZA) Zoo de Granby Kansas City Zoo Zoo de la Palmyre $20,000 and above Laurie Bingaman Lackey Evenson Design Group Los Angeles Zoo $250 and above Minnesota Zoological Garden Madrid Zoo-Parques
    [Show full text]
  • Acte Argeo Final
    GEOTHERMAL RESOURCE INDICATIONS OF THE GEOLOGIC DEVELOPMENT AND HYDROTHERMAL ACTIVITIES OF D.R.C. Getahun Demissie Addis Abeba, Ethiopia, [email protected] ABSTRACT Published sources report the occurrence of more than 135 thermal springs in D.R.C. All occur in the eastern part of the country, in association with the Western rift and the associated rifted and faulted terrains lying to its west. Limited information was available on the characteristics of the thermal features and the natural conditions under which they occur. Literature study of the regional distribution of these features and of the few relatively better known thermal spring areas, coupled with the evaluation of the gross geologic conditions yielded encouraging results. The occurrence of the anomalously large number of thermal springs is attributed to the prevalence of abnormally high temperature conditions in the upper crust induced by a particularly high standing region of anomalously hot asthenosphere. Among the 29 thermal springs the locations of which could be determined, eight higher temperature features which occur in six geologic environments were found to warrant further investigation. The thermal springs occur in all geologic terrains. Thermal fluid ascent from depth is generally influenced by faulting while its emergence at the surface is controlled by the near-surface hydrology. These factors allow the adoption of simple hydrothermal fluid circulation models which can guide exploration. Field observations and thermal water sampling for chemical analyses are recommended for acquiring the data which will allow the selection of the most promising prospects for detailed, integrated multidisciplinary exploration. An order of priorities is suggested based on economic and technical criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • New Northwestern and Southwestern Range Limits of De Brazz's Monkey, Mbam Et Djerem National Park, Cameroon, and Bateke Plat
    Primate Conservation 2007 (22): 107–110 New Northwestern and Southwestern Range Limits of De Brazza’s Monkey, Mbam et Djerem National Park, Cameroon, and Bateke Plateau, Gabon and Congo Fiona Maisels1, Nicolas Bout2,3, Clement Inkamba-Inkulu4, Liz Pearson3, Paul Aczel3, Rufin Ambahe5, Edgar Ambassa5 and Roger Fotso5 1Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA 2Wildlife Conservation Society, Libreville, Gabon 3John Aspinall Foundation, Franceville/Mpassa, Gabon 4Wildlife Conservation Society, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo 5Wildlife Conservation Society, Yaoundé, Cameroon Abstract: Recent surveys carried out in Cameroon in the Mbam Djerem National Park, in Gabon in the Bateke Plateau National Park, and the adjoining Bateke Plateau area in Congo, have recorded the presence of de Brazza’s monkey (Cercopithecus neglec- tus) on both sides of the Djerem River in Cameroon, along the Mpassa and its tributaries in Gabon, along the Nambouli River in the Lefini Reserve in Congo, and up to the right bank of the Ogooué River on the Congo side of the border. These areas lie at the northern and southern edges of the Central African forest block, where rivers have relatively wide bands of riparian forest. As for the range extension of the talapoin (this volume), the species may simply have been overlooked by previous rapid wildlife surveys. It has an antipredator behavior that renders it relatively inconspicuous, tends to live in small family groups in the region, and lives in habitats that are difficult to survey on foot. However, unlike talapoin, it calls every morning along major watercourses, and can be heard for some distance. It is possible that the southern limit of this species in Gabon may be the Ogooué River.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestral Art of Gabon from the Collections of the Barbier-Mueller
    ancestral art ofgabon previously published Masques d'Afrique Art ofthe Salomon Islands future publications Art ofNew Guinea Art ofthe Ivory Coast Black Gold louis perrois ancestral art ofgabon from the collections ofthe barbier-mueiler museum photographs pierre-alain ferrazzini translation francine farr dallas museum ofart january 26 - june 15, 1986 los angeles county museum ofart august 28, 1986 - march 22, 1987 ISBN 2-88104-012-8 (ISBN 2-88104-011-X French Edition) contents Directors' Foreword ........................................................ 5 Preface. ................................................................. 7 Maps ,.. .. .. .. .. ...... .. .. .. .. .. 14 Introduction. ............................................................. 19 Chapter I: Eastern Gabon 35 Plates. ........................................................ 59 Chapter II: Southern and Central Gabon ....................................... 85 Plates 105 Chapter III: Northern Gabon, Equatorial Guinea, and Southem Cameroon ......... 133 Plates 155 Iliustrated Catalogue ofthe Collection 185 Index ofGeographical Names 227 Index ofPeoplcs 229 Index ofVernacular Names 231 Appendix 235 Bibliography 237 Directors' Foreword The extraordinarily diverse sculptural arts ofthe Dallas, under the auspices of the Smithsonian West African nation ofGabon vary in style from Institution). two-dimcnsional, highly stylized works to three­ dimensional, relatively naturalistic ones. AU, We are pleased to be able to present this exhibi­ however, reveal an intense connection with
    [Show full text]
  • Stratégie Nationale Et Plan D'action Sur La Diversité Biologique Du Gabon
    MINISTERE DES EAUX ET REPUBLIQUE GABONAISE FORETS, DE LA PECHE, DU ------------------- REBOISEMENT CHARGE DE Union-Travail-Justice L’ENVIRONNEMENT ET DE LA ------------------- PROTECTION DE LA NATURE --------------------------- DIRECTION GENERALE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT STRATÉGIE NATIONALE ET PLAN D’ACTION SUR LA DIVERSITÉ BIOLOGIQUE DU GABON “ Le Gabon, à l’horizon 2025, doit assurer la conservation de la biodiversité et garantir un partage satisfaisant des avantages socio- économiques et écologiques issus des ressources biologiques par une prise de conscience de l’importance de ses ressources biologiques et par un développement des capacités humaines et institutionnelles. ” Novembre 1999 1 2 M. Le Ministre chargé de l’Environnement, Le directeur général de l’environnement et le coordonnateur national Biodiversité tiennent à remercier les personnes qui ont participé à la rédaction de la présente stratégie, particulièrement M. Anaclet BISSIELO1 et M. Robert Kasisi2 pour avoir dirigé l’équipe de rédaction. Il s’agit de : M. Jean-Marie BENGONE, Directeur Général de l’Environnement M. Jean Baptiste MEBIAME Coordonnateur National Biodiversité M. Omer NTOUGOU NDOUTOUME, coordonnateur adjoint Biodiversité M. Jean Simon MOUCKAGA KOMBILA,Commissaire Général à l’Aménagement du Territoire M. Hamidou OKABA, Commissaire général adjoint au Plan M. Christ MOMBO NZATSI, Conseiller du ministre du tourisme M. Marcel BRIDON, Conseiller du ministre de l’agriculture M. Mintsa Mi Obiang, ingénieur des Eaux et Forêts, conseiller du ministre des Eaux et forêts Dr Guy ROSSATANGA RIGNAULT, Juriste, conseiller du Ministre, enseignant M. Athanase BOUSSENGUE, Directeur des études, Ministère des Eaux et forêts M. Jean Gérard MEZUI M’ELLA, Directeur de la police phytosanitaire M. Augustin MAGANGA, Directeur du Centre National Anti-pollution M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Ecology of a Small-Scale Fishery, Mweru-Luapula, Zambia
    Managing inequality: the political ecology of a small-scale fishery, Mweru-Luapula, Zambia Bram Verelst1 University of Ghent, Belgium 1. Introduction Many scholars assume that most small-scale inland fishery communities represent the poorest sections of rural societies (Béné 2003). This claim is often argued through what Béné calls the "old paradigm" on poverty in inland fisheries: poverty is associated with natural factors including the ecological effects of high catch rates and exploitation levels. The view of inland fishing communities as the "poorest of the poorest" does not imply directly that fishing automatically lead to poverty, but it is linked to the nature of many inland fishing areas as a common-pool resources (CPRs) (Gordon 2005). According to this paradigm, a common and open-access property resource is incapable of sustaining increasing exploitation levels caused by horizontal effects (e.g. population pressure) and vertical intensification (e.g. technological improvement) (Brox 1990 in Jul-Larsen et al. 2003; Kapasa, Malasha and Wilson 2005). The gradual exhaustion of fisheries due to "Malthusian" overfishing was identified by H. Scott Gordon (1954) and called the "tragedy of the commons" by Hardin (1968). This influential model explains that whenever individuals use a resource in common – without any form of regulation or restriction – this will inevitably lead to its environmental degradation. This link is exemplified by the prisoner's dilemma game where individual actors, by rationally following their self-interest, will eventually deplete a shared resource, which is ultimately against the interest of each actor involved (Haller and Merten 2008; Ostrom 1990). Summarized, the model argues that the open-access nature of a fisheries resource will unavoidably lead to its overexploitation (Kraan 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Out of Lake Tanganyika: Endemic Lake Fishes Inhabit Rapids of the Lukuga River
    355 Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 355-376, 5 figs., 3 tabs., December 2011 © 2011 by Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, Germany – ISSN 0936-9902 Out of Lake Tanganyika: endemic lake fishes inhabit rapids of the Lukuga River Sven O. Kullander* and Tyson R. Roberts** The Lukuga River is a large permanent river intermittently serving as the only effluent of Lake Tanganyika. For at least the first one hundred km its water is almost pure lake water. Seventy-seven species of fish were collected from six localities along the Lukuga River. Species of cichlids, cyprinids, and clupeids otherwise known only from Lake Tanganyika were identified from rapids in the Lukuga River at Niemba, 100 km from the lake, whereas downstream localities represent a Congo River fish fauna. Cichlid species from Niemba include special- ized algal browsers that also occur in the lake (Simochromis babaulti, S. diagramma) and one invertebrate picker representing a new species of a genus (Tanganicodus) otherwise only known from the lake. Other fish species from Niemba include an abundant species of clupeid, Stolothrissa tanganicae, otherwise only known from Lake Tangan- yika that has a pelagic mode of life in the lake. These species demonstrate that their adaptations are not neces- sarily dependent upon the lake habitat. Other endemic taxa occurring at Niemba are known to frequent vegetat- ed shore habitats or river mouths similar to the conditions at the entrance of the Lukuga, viz. Chelaethiops minutus (Cyprinidae), Lates mariae (Latidae), Mastacembelus cunningtoni (Mastacembelidae), Astatotilapia burtoni, Ctenochromis horei, Telmatochromis dhonti, and Tylochromis polylepis (Cichlidae). The Lukuga frequently did not serve as an ef- fluent due to weed masses and sand bars building up at the exit, and low water levels of Lake Tanganyika.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use
    Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 6 IUCN - The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biologi- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna cal diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- of fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their vation of species or biological diversity. conservation, and for the management of other species of conservation con- cern. Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: sub-species and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintaining biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of bio- vulnerable species. logical diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conservation Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitoring 1. To participate in the further development, promotion and implementation the status of species and populations of conservation concern. of the World Conservation Strategy; to advise on the development of IUCN's Conservation Programme; to support the implementation of the • development and review of conservation action plans and priorities Programme' and to assist in the development, screening, and monitoring for species and their populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lingala.Pdf 3 National African Language Resource Center (NALRC)
    Table of Contents Profile ________________________________________________________________ 5 Introduction ________________________________________________________________ 5 Geography ____________________________________________________________ 6 Area _______________________________________________________________________ 6 Climate ____________________________________________________________________ 6 Geographic Divisions and Topographic Features ___________________________________ 6 Basin ___________________________________________________________________________ 6 High Plateaus _____________________________________________________________________ 7 Rivers and Lakes _____________________________________________________________ 7 Congo River ______________________________________________________________________ 7 Uele River _______________________________________________________________________ 8 Ubangi River _____________________________________________________________________ 8 Lake Mai‐Ndombe _________________________________________________________________ 8 Major Cities _________________________________________________________________ 9 Kinshasa_________________________________________________________________________ 9 Mbandaka _______________________________________________________________________ 9 Bumba _________________________________________________________________________ 10 Gbadolite _______________________________________________________________________ 10 History ____________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Inventaire Rapide Des Zones Humides Représentatives En République Démocratique Du Congo
    Inventaire Rapide des Zones Humides Représentatives en République Démocratique du Congo Editors and Major Contributors : Michele Thieme, Aurelie Shapiro, Alejandra Colom, Uli Schliewen, Nikolai Sindorf, Andre Kamdem Toham Supported by the Swiss Grant for Africa, Ramsar Convention Secretariat Table of Contents Executive Summary I. Introduction II. Approach and Methodology for Rapid Inventory of Wetland Priority Areas A. Aquatic Ecosystem Classification and Gap Analysis B. Human Use / Suitability Analysis C. Marxan Model D. Delineation and Prioritization of Wetland Areas E. Threats assessment, socio economic importance and key stakeholders Appendix I. Contributors Appendix II. List of Protected Areas used in the Gap Analysis Appendix III. Photos of Wetland Areas Appendix IV. List of Fish Species by Wetland Priority Area Executive Summary In 2002, the government of the Democratic Republic of Congo committed to increase its protected area coverage to 15% from just over 8%. WWF, RAMSAR, OSFAC and other partners supported the effort by convening an expert workshop in Kinshasa, DRC in November 2007, to undertake a country wide biodiversity assessment, including a rapid inventory and prioritization of the biodiversity value of the wetlands of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Several products were developed prior to the workshop to facilitate the work of the experts. These were: (1) a map classifying small sub‐basins in DRC by the predominant aquatic habitat types and (2) a map of human use/suitability. The aquatic habitat or ecosystem map was used as a basis for ensuring representation of all habitat types across the country and the suitability map provided a measure of the level of human impact.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    RESTRICTED Report No. PA-118a Public Disclosure Authorized This report is for official use only by the Bank Group and specifically authorized organizations or persons. It may not be published, quoted or cited without Bank Group authorization. The Rank Group dosnot acenp resnonshibiliy for the ---ray orcr.ltn f th rpot INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENr INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION Public Disclosure Authorized AGRICULTURAL SECTOR SURVEY REPUBLIC OF ZAIRE (in three volumes) VOLUME II Public Disclosure Authorized ANNEXES 1 THROUGH 6 June 19, 1972 Public Disclosure Authorized Aogri niut ulr P =lnt-r DoTpon rtment BACKGROUND DATA US$1 = 0.5 zaires (Z) or i0 ri-La'ruta (1x) One zaire = 2.0 US$ Total Land Area 234.5 million ha (905,000 square miles) of which (i) Forests 102.3 million ha (ii) Cultivated land 2.3 million ha (iii) Permanent pasture 2.3 million ha (iv) Savannahs, mountains, rivers and lakes 127.6 million ha Population (Official estimate, 1970) 21.6 million Distribution: Rural 70% : Urban 30% Annual rate of growth, 1958-70: 3.9% Gross Domestic Product Total, 1970 (est.) Z 1,014 million (US$2,028 million) Per canita. 1970 (est.): Z 47 (US$94) Agricultural output as % of GDP, 1969: 18% Commercialized production: 10% Subsistence production: 8% Agricultural Exports and Imports Value of Agricultural Exports, 1969: US$97 million Share of Total Exports: 14.5% Principal export products: palm oil, coffee, rubber, wood products, tea Value of Agricultural Imports, 1968: US$56 million Share of Total Imports: 11% Principal imports: cereals, fish and fish products, meat and dairy products, fruit and vegetables, tobacco Cnn9u.mpr Prrire Index (IRES - Kinsghaa) June 1970 (June 1960 = 100) 1,454 GENER.AL NOTE ON DATA The statistical data available on most facets of the economy and population of the Republic of Zaire are quite unreliable for the post--Independence periods -- a fact which official publications readily acknowledge.
    [Show full text]