The Physiology of Placebos Magnetic Underlays Superstition Survey (Part 2)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Physiology of Placebos Magnetic Underlays Superstition Survey (Part 2) The physiology of placebos Magnetic underlays Superstition survey (Part 2) number 91 - autumn 2009 content editorial The physiology of the placebo effect 3 The supernatural Magnetic underlays: what’s the attraction? 3 retains its appeal Newsfront 10 Forum 12 LTHOUGH formal religion is continuing to decline in this Hokum Locum 14 Acountry, belief in the supernatural remains high. That seems Supersitious? Me? That to be the main conclusion to be drawn from a recent survey of New depends (Part 2) 18 Zealand religious affiliations and attitudes carried out by Massey University as part of the International Social Survey Programme. Evolution: What the fossils say and why it matters – The survey of 1000 people found 40 percent of respondents said Book Review 19 they had no religious affiliation compared with 29 percent just 17 years ago. Fifty-three percent said they believed in God, although half of those said they had doubts, and 20 percent believed in some form of higher power. Professor Philip Gendall, who led the study, said there had been no change in the proportion of those who say they believe in a higher power. “The survey shows that God is not dead, but religion may be dying,” he said. Fifty-seven percent believed in life after death, with 51 percent believing in heaven and 36 percent ISSN - 1172-062X believing in hell, the survey showed. Contributions Of particular interest to skeptics were the responses on supersti- Contributions are welcome and tions, though these were only a small part of the overall study. A should be sent to: quarter thought star signs could affect people’s futures, 28 percent David Riddell said good luck charms work and 39 percent said they believed for- 122 Woodlands Rd tune-tellers could foresee the future. RD1 Hamilton Email: [email protected] Perhaps we can take some comfort in the fact that those figures are all well under 50 percent, but they’re still high. It would be interest- Deadline for next issue: ing to see reliable, up-to-date figures for attitudes in New Zealand June 10 2009 towards alternative medicine, creationism, mediums, UFOs, and the Letters for the Forum may be edited various claims of the alternative archaeology crowd. Some of those as space requires - up to 250 words I suspect would be really alarming. is preferred. Please indicate the publication and date of all clippings I’m not aware of any formal attempt to carry out such a study. The for the Newsfront. closest would be last year’s Sunday Star-Times survey, of which the second half of Vicki Hyde’s response is printed in this issue. Re- Material supplied by email or IBM- compatible disk is appreciated. spondents in that were a self-selected subset of the paper’s readership – hardly a random sample of the entire country. All the same, where Permission is given to other non- comparisons could be made, results are fairly comparable with the profit skeptical organisations to Massey survey – eg 40 percent of respondents said they believed in reprint material from this publication provided the author and NZ Skeptic God with another 10 percent not sure, which could be rephrased as are acknowledged. 50 percent believing but 10 percent uncertain, quite similar to the Massey figures. About 44 percent thought it was possible to foresee Opinions expressed in the New Zealand Skeptic are those of the the future, which is again close to what Gendall’s team found. So individual authors and do not even though the Sunday Star-Times survey’s prime objectives were to necessarily represent the views of entertain and to sell papers, it seems it may NZ Skeptics (Inc.) or its officers. have provided a useful snapshot of New Subscription details are available Zealanders’ attitudes to the paranormal. from www.skeptics.org.nz or PO Box 29-492, Christchurch. number 91 - autumn 2009 main feature The physiology of the placebo effect Martin Wallace Placebos may contain no active ingredients, but they have real effects on the human brain. This arti- cle is based on a presentation to the NZ Skeptics 2008 conference in Hamilton, September 26-28. ARLIER this year, Dr Tipu response to some arcane practice seventh to ninth centuries. Chau- EAamir of the Auckland Pain is a placebo response, that settles cer called one of his characters Management Service drew my at- the issue. Placebo in the Merchant’s Tale, tention to something peculiar. In because the word had come to a double-blind, randomised, pla- Over the last 30 years there has mean a flatterer, a sycophant, or cebo-controlled trial of morphine been a large amount of research a parasite, by the 14th century. after a standard knee operation, into the undoubted effects of “Placebo seyde: 30 percent of those receiving a placebos. I thought it might be Ful little need had ye, my lord placebo get pain relief. When of interest to review this work in the context of our frequent use so deare, those people are given a specific Council to ask, of any that are morphine antagonist (‘antidote’), of ‘placebo effect’ to explain the unscientific. here their pain comes back! In the But that ye be so ful of sapi- words of a former contributor at ence.” an annual conference of this society, this was an epiphany. He also uses it in the Par- I needed to know more. son’s tale: “Flatterers be the Devil’s chaplains, which sing After all, how could some- ever ‘Placebo’.” thing that was ‘all in the mind’ be changed predictably In the 1811 edition of by a substance with a known Hooper’s Medical Diction- pharmacological action? ary, placebo was defined as “an epithet for any medicine Any study of homeopathy adopted more to please than raises the issue of the pla- benefit the patient”. In a re- cebo effect. As a result of a cent edition of Collins’ Con- meta-analysis in 2005 of a cise Dictionary of the English number of studies comparing Language it is defined as “an homeopathic remedies with inactive substance adminis- What does ‘all in the mind’ mean? Placebos orthodox treatment, Shang et generate real changes in brain function. tered to a patient to compare al stated in their conclusion its effects with those of a that the effect of homeopathic real drug, but sometimes for remedies was no greater than that Placebo is a Latin word for the psychological benefit of the of a placebo. Not that they had “I shall be pleasing, or accept- patient through his believing he no effect, but it was no greater able”. It is the first word of the is receiving treatment”. than that of a placebo. first antiphon of the Roman Rite of the Vespers for the Dead (!), However, placebos do benefit We skeptics are often happy to Placebo Domino, dating from the patients, and they are certainly accept the explanation that if a page placebos not inactive in the context in • The site of this activity in effect, and that in fact, as an inert which they are given. the brain placebo can have no effect per se, what we see is the effect of the • The most dramatic example of Why there is variation context in which the treatment this that I saw in clinical practice in the placebo effect from indi- is given. involved a young man on arti- vidual to individual ficial kidney treatment. When Neurophysiology of placebo • erythropoietin became available What are the implica- pain relief for the treatment of the severe tions for the classical drug trial anaemia seen so often in this format? Over the last 30 years, there situation, he was the first patient has been much interest in the neuro-physiological mechanisms in our unit to receive it. Erythro- There must be a of the placebo response. poietin is a hormone made in the physiological cause for healthy kidney, which increases placebo analgesia. In 1975, Hughes et al iden- the number of red cells in the tified in the brain two related blood and the amount of the oxy- pentapeptides (a chain of five gen-carrying haemoglobin. The amino acids linked together) synthetic version has achieved Psychological mechanisms with potent opium-like action. notoriety as a performance en- There are many more now iden- hancer in sport, for example in Those who study the psycho- tified. These compounds act the Tour de France. We were logical processes of the placebo on specific receptors on the all very enthusiastic about this effect cite two major mecha- membranes of neurones, and via improvement in management nisms. intracellular metabolic changes for our patient, and he was given Conditioning. Pavlov (1849- increase synaptic transmission. his first dose with much interest 1936) showed that dogs given They are made in the pituitary from all of us. That night he meals as a bell rang would and hypothalamus, and are called went home, recovered his bicycle subsequently salivate when the endorphins. from the shed where it had been bell rang despite not being given A digression undisturbed for many months, food. This process has been and rode all around his town explored in humans, who will In pharmacology the term with great energy and pleasure. experience pain relief when a agonist denotes a drug with an He hadn’t heard the information placebo is substituted for a pain effect, and antagonist, a drug that the drug took three weeks to reliever when a sequence of ac- which specifically blocks the ef- act on the anaemia. tive analgesia has been associ- fect of the first substance. ated with an environmental cue.
Recommended publications
  • The Paleontograph______
    __________The Paleontograph________ A newsletter for those interested in all aspects of Paleontology Volume 5 Issue 1 March, 2016 _________________________________________________________________ From Your Editor Welcome to our latest issue. I hope you enjoyed the holidays. If you are anything like me, you are looking forward to Spring. We've had a mild winter here in CO. Weather is different than the east coast. While the nights are colder, the days are warmer. It's a nice change for me. I finally have my fossil lab up and running and I am spending my days, or part thereof, working off my backlog of fossils. It has been a couple of months since our last issue but Bob has kept writing and so we have an interesting issue for you to enjoy. The Paleontograph was created in 2012 to continue what was originally the newsletter of The New Jersey Paleontological Society. The Paleontograph publishes articles, book reviews, personal accounts, and anything else that relates to Paleontology and fossils. Feel free to submit both technical and non-technical work. We try to appeal to a wide range of people interested in fossils. Articles about localities, specific types of fossils, fossil preparation, shows or events, museum displays, field trips, websites are all welcome. This newsletter is meant to be one by and for the readers. Issues will come out when there is enough content to fill an issue. I encourage all to submit contributions. It will be interesting, informative and fun to read. It can become whatever the readers and contributors want it to be, so it will be a work in progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Creation-Evolution Debate in Public Life
    MAPPING THE CREATION-EVOLUTION DEBATE IN PUBLIC LIFE by ANDREW JUDSON HART (Under the Direction of Edward Panetta) ABSTRACT Evolution versus creation is a divisive issue as religion is pitted against science in public discourse. Despite mounting scientific evidence in favor of evolution and legal decisions against the teaching of creationism in public schools, the number of advocates who still argue for creationist teaching in the science curriculum of public schools remains quite large. Public debates have played a key role in the creationist movement, and this study examines public debates between creationists and evolutionists over thirty years to track trends and analyze differences in arguments and political style in an attempt to better understand why creationism remains salient with many in the American public. INDEX WORDS: Creation; Evolution; Public Debate; Argumentation; Political Style; Bill Nye MAPPING THE CREATION-EVOLUTION DEBATE IN PUBLIC LIFE by ANDREW JUDSON HART B.A., The University of Georgia, 2010 B.S.F.R., The University of Georgia, 2010 M.A.T., The University of Georgia, 2014 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2016 © 2016 Andrew Judson Hart All Rights Reserved MAPPING THE CREATION-EVOLUTION DEBATE IN PUBLIC LIFE by ANDREW JUDSON HART Major Professor: Edward Panetta Committee: Barbara Biesecker Thomas Lessl Electronic Version Approved: Suzanne Barbour Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2016 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without Dr. Ed Panetta pushing me down the path to study the creation-evolution debates and his work with me on this through the many drafts and edits.
    [Show full text]
  • Thegreatestshowonearth-Indonesian.Pdf
    1 PERTUNJUKAN TERHEBAT DI MUKA BUMI BUKTI YANG MENDUKUNG EVOLUSI RICHARD DAWKINS Diterjemahkan oleh Wahyu Ginting Terjemahan ini diterbitkan dan tersedia GRATIS di translationsproject.org 2 Daftar Isi Prakata ............................................................................................................................. 3 BAB 1 HANYA TEORI? ............................................................................................... 5 BAB 2 ANJING, SAPI, DAN KUBIS ......................................................................... 16 BAB 3 JALAN BERTABUR BUNGA MENUJU MAKRO-EVOLUSI ................. 31 BAB 4 KEHENINGAN DAN WAKTU YANG LAMBAT ...................................... 58 BAB 5 DI DEPAN MATA KEPALA KITA .............................................................. 74 BAB 6 MATA RANTAI YANG HILANG? APA MAKSUDNYA, ‘HILANG’? ... 96 BAB 7 ORANG-ORANG HILANG? TIDAK HILANG LAGI ............................. 121 BAB 8 ANDA SENDIRI MELAKUKANNYA DALAM SEMBILAN BULAN .. 139 BAB 9 BAHTERA BENUA-BENUA ....................................................................... 167 BAB 10 POHON KEKERABATAN SEPUPU ........................................................ 188 BAB 11 SEJARAH TERTULIS DI SEKUJUR TUBUH KITA ............................ 222 BAB 12 PERLOMBAAN SENJATA DAN ‘TEODISI EVOLUSIONER’ ........... 245 BAB 13 ADA KEMEGAHAN DALAM CARA PANDANG INI .......................... 260 LAMPIRAN PARA PENYANGKAL SEJARAH................................................... 279 CATATAN ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Qanon • 75 Years of the Bomb • Vaccine History • Raising
    SQANON • K75 YEARS OF ETHE BOMB P• VACCINE HISTORYT • RAISINGI CTHE DEAD? Extraordinary Claims, Revolutionary Ideas & the Promotion of Science—Vol.25Science—Vol.25 No.4No.4 2020 $6.95 USA and Canada www.skeptic.com • WHAT IS QANON? • HOW QANON RECYCLES CENTURIES-OLD CONSPIRACY BELIEFS • HOW QANON HURTS THEIR OWN CAUSE • QANON IN CONSPIRATORIAL CONTEXT watch or listen for free Hear leading scientists, scholars, and thinkers discuss the most important issues of our time. Hosted by Michael Shermer. #146 Dr. DonalD Prothero— # 130 Dr. DeBra Soh—the end # 113 Dave ruBIn— # 106 Dr. DanIel ChIrot— Weird earth: Debunking Strange of Gender: Debunking the Myths Don’t Burn this Book: you Say you Want a revolution? Ideas about our Planet about Sex & Identity in our Society thinking for yourself in an radical Idealism and its tragic age of unreason Consequences #145 GreG lukIanoff—Mighty # 129 Dr. Mona Sue WeISSMark Ira: the aClu’s controversial involve- —the Science of Diversity # 112 ann Druyan—Cosmos: # 105 Dr. DIana PaSulka— ment in the Skokie case of 1977. Possible Worlds. how science and american Cosmic: ufos, # 128 MIChael ShellenBerGer civilization grew up together religion, and technology #144 Dr. aGuStIn fuenteS— —apocalypse never: Why environ- Why We Believe: evolution and the mental alarmism hurts us all human Way of Being # 127 Dr. WIllIaM Perry and #143 Dr. nICholaS ChrIStakIS— toM CollIna—the Button: the apollo’s arrow: the Profound and new nuclear arms race and Presi- enduring Impact of Coronavirus on dential Power from truman to trump the Way We live # 126 Sarah SColeS—they are #142 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change
    How We Know Global Warming is Real and Human Caused: BY DONALD R. PROTHERO CITED: PROTHERO, D, R, 2012, “How We Know Global Warming is Real and Human Caused,” Sceptic Magazine, vol-17, number-2, 2012, pp.14-22, retrieved from, http://www.sceptic.com, on 10/05/2103. Pine Island Glacier (photo shown above) In mid-October 2011, NASA scientists working in Antarctica discovered a massive crack across the Pine Island Glacier, a major ice stream that drains the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Extending for 19 miles (30 kilometers), the crack was 260 feet (80 meters) wide and 195 feet (60 meters) deep. Eventually, the crack will extend all the way across the glacier, and calve a giant iceberg that will cover about 350 square miles (900 square kilometers). This image from the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) instrument on NAS’s Terra spacecraft was acquired Nov. 13, 2011, and covers an area of 27 by 32 miles (44 by 52 kilometers), and is located near 74.9 degrees south latitude, 101.1 degrees west longitude. (Image Credit:NASA/GSFC/METI/ERSDAC/JAROS, and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team) On January 27, 2012, theWall Street Journal ran anOpinion Editorial written by 16 people who deny the evidence of human-induced climate change. Most of the authors of the editorial were not climate scientists; one of two actual climate scientists of the group, Richard Lindzen, is a notorious global warming denier who also denies that smoking causes cancer. Predictably, the Rupert Murdoch-owned Journalrefused to run a statement by 255 members of the National Academy of Sciences, although a “Letter to the Editor” by 38 of the world’s leading climate scientists1 did manage to get published there.
    [Show full text]
  • Beastly Fakes ‘Sasquatch’ Tracks — the Book Could Justi- Fiably Have Been a Compilation of Mockery and Humour
    followed by other people faking evidence, until a self-reinforcing legend is established. As more monster hunters flock to find the beast, more dubious evidence is generated. Before you know it, there is a souvenir shop POPPERFOTO/GETTY POPPERFOTO/GETTY selling T-shirts. Yet it is the hunters — ranging from out- right rogues to serious, if misguided, research- ers — who make this a gripping read. For instance, Bernard Heuvelmans, referenced as the founder of modern cryptozoology, earned a doctorate studying aardvark teeth, worked as a jazz musician and comedian, escaped from the Nazis and befriended Tintin creator Georges Prosper Remi (known by the pen- name ‘Hergé’) before producing his work on “What cryptids of all kinds. emerges is On a 1958 expedi- a never less tion to Tibet to seek than rigorous the yeti (a kind of examination Himalayan Bigfoot), of the led by Texas oil baron evidence.” Tom Slick, some members of the group allegedly performed sleight of hand on a sacred relic, swapping human finger bones for purported yeti A purported yeti footprint from the Menlung Basin in Nepal. bones. The stolen bones were reportedly smuggled out of the country in the luggage CRYPTOZOOLOGY of actor James Stewart. Going by these and other anecdotes in Abominable Science! — such as people strapping on fake wooden feet to create Beastly fakes ‘Sasquatch’ tracks — the book could justi- fiably have been a compilation of mockery and humour. In fact, it is a sensitive but Daniel Cressey delves into a sceptics’ history of devastating takedown of an entire subcul- monster hunters and their mythical quarry.
    [Show full text]
  • Reality, Science and the Supernatural CAN SCIENCE SUPPORT BELIEF in a CREATOR GOD?
    Reality, Science and the Supernatural CAN SCIENCE SUPPORT BELIEF IN A CREATOR GOD? John Brain Copyright © John Brain 2016 PAGE 1 To my wife Joyce for her invaluable support PAGE 2 Contents Preface p 6 Chapter 1 The Project p 14 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Main Doubts Materialism and mind/matter relationship Evolution Scientific and personal explanation Supporting evidence from science 1.3 A Project Outline 1.4 Key Points Chapter 2 Materialism and Reality p 30 2.1 Introduction 2.2. Modern physical sciences 2.3 The nature of matter 2.3.1 Looking inwards Quantum weirdness Vibrating strings of energy The Theory of chaos 2.3.2 Looking upwards Dark Mystery 2.4 Discussion 2.5 Key Points Chapter 3 Evolution and Reality p 53 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Darwinian evolution 3.3 Three viewpoints on human development Young earth creationism Intelligent design Evolution 3.4 Does belief in God prevent acceptance of the theory of evolution 3.5 Does evolution need God? 3.6 Theistic evolution What is theistic evolution? Why can evolution be such a cruel process? Does Theistic evolution introduce a “God of the Gaps”? PAGE 3 3.7 Discussion 3.8 Key Points Chapter 4 Science and Reality p 74 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Advances in Science – emergence of a new reality Biology Physical Sciences 4.3 A More Reliable Explanation of Reality Some dogmas of modern science No “Theory of Everything” No satisfactory explanation of quantum physics More intriguing problems 4.4 The Limitations of Science Science is continually changing Science is not geared to answer “Why”
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 1 February, 2014 ______
    __________The Paleontograph________ A newsletter for those interested in all aspects of Paleontology Volume 3 Issue 1 February, 2014 _________________________________________________________________ From Your Editor Welcome to our first issue for 2014. I hope you had a good holiday season. I was trying to get this issue out last month but time just got away from me. I just back from the Tucson show. I had a great time seeing many cool fossils and many cool friends. I don’t think I saw anything new and fabulous. There were many of the standards. I did see one very cool Cretaceous fish, a rare species and probably the most complete one ever found. I hope it ends up in a museum. There is a line that amateurs and commercial dealers have to walk, where we can find a scientifically valuable fossil and you have to decide whether to keep it, sell it or donate it. I’ve donated many fossils to many museums around the country but sometimes the expense and effort preclude a donation. We all need to work together but personalities often get in the way. There are many professional paleontologists that work together with amateurs and commercial dealers and many that absolutely refuse to even consider the concept. Too bad. I have some good stuff for you this month. The Paleontograph was created in 2012 to continue what was originally the newsletter of The New Jersey Paleontological Society. The Paleontograph publishes articles, book reviews, personal accounts, and anything else that relates to Paleontology and fossils. Feel free to submit both technical and non-technical work.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Ross Prothero
    DONALD ROSS PROTHERO Education University of California, Riverside. 1972-1976. B.A., 1976, majors in geology and biology. Columbia University, New York, New York. 1976-1982. M.A., 1978, geological sciences; M.Phil., 1979, geological sciences; Ph.D., 1982, geological sciences. Title of dissertation: “Medial Oligocene magnetostratigraphy and mammalian biostratigraphy: testing the isochroneity of mammalian biostratigraphic events.” Academic honors and grants Occidental College: grant from Petroleum Research Fund, 1985-1987; SVP Romer Prize Committee, 1987-9; Associate Editor, Paleobiology, 1987-1989; NSF grant EAR87-08221, 1987-1991; Fellow of the Linnean Society of London, 1987; Guggenheim Fellow, 1988-1989; Adjunct Editor, Paleobiology, 1990-1992; Schuchert Award of the Paleontological Society (outstanding paleontologist under 40), 1991; NSF grant EAR91-17819, 1991-1994; Editorial Board, Skeptic, 1992-present; Technical Editor, Journal of Paleontology, 1992-1998; SVP Program Committee, 1993-1997; Outstanding Paper Award, Skeptic, 1993; Paleontological Society Distinguished Speaker, 1993-1994; NSF grant 94-05942, 1994-1997: Choice outstanding science book of 1995 (Paradise Lost); consulting editor, McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science and Technology, 1996-present; consulting editor, McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology (9th ed.), 1997; NSF grant EAR97-06046, 1997- 1999; elected Fellow of the GSA, 10/21/97; grant from Petroleum Research Fund, 1998-2000; GRE Geology Examination Committee, 1998-2000; NSF grant EAR98-05071, 1998-2000;
    [Show full text]
  • "Goodness Without Godness", with Professor Phil Zuckerman
    The Secular Circular Newsletter of the Humanist Society of Santa Barbara www.SBHumanists.org OCTOBER 2013 October Program: Political Evolution – From the Enlightenment to the Present Professor Joe White Santa Barbara City College Professor and Chairman of the Philosophy Department , Joe White, one of our most popular speakers and friend of our Society, will regale us on October 19th with Political Evolution- From the Enlightenment to the Present and What’s in Store for our Grandchildren. This is a theory of justice which is based upon Political Liberalism as promulgated by John Rawls, a prominent philosopher of our own time. The original theory began in the 16th Century with Locke and Hume, which led to Jefferson’s 18th Century Philosophy and its reliance upon Enlightenment works. This led to Abraham Lincoln’s Republicanism of the 19th Century, thence to Franklin Roosevelt’s New Democracy and to the Human Rights movement by Kennedy and Johnson in the 20th Century. The theme of “The Right vs. the Good” has been debated over the centuries and understood differently by many honest people. What will our grandchildren’s experience be in the next 50 years or more? Not only is Joe the Chairman of the Philosophy Department and author of many books on this topic , he is also the Executive Director of the Center for Philosophy and the Founder of “ A Year Without War” , an idea of Joe’s that is turning into a global movement. When: Saturday, October 19th, 2013 Where: Patio Room at Vista Del Monte. (Park ONLY in spaces marked "VDM".) Time: Doors open at 2:30pm.
    [Show full text]
  • 92313745.Pdf
    36 The Truth About Transitional Fossils DONALD R. PROTHERO Department of Geology, Occidental College Los Angeles, CA 90041 [email protected] 1. Of Fossils and Creationists In the United States, the contentious debate about “intelligent design” (ID) has focused on many issues: complexity and its possible explanations; the explanation for biological structures; the naturalistic approach to science; and many other philosophical and biological topics. The books of the “intelligent design” creationists are filled with such examples and discussions, but they pointedly avoid discussing the fossil record or its implications. Behe (1996, p. 27) mentions paleontology only in a few paragraphs in his book-length treatment, and most of the other ID books are similarly silent about the fossil record. Only the ID creationist textbook Of Pandas and People (Davis and Kenyon, 2004) discusses fossils at any length, and only in a single chapter of a 170-page book. The ID creationists have been quoted on numerous occasions as conceding that microevolution occurs, and that the earth may be millions of years old. This distinguishes them from the more extreme fundamentalist “Young-Earth Creationists” (YEC), who believe the earth is only 6000 years old and will not admit that microevolution occurs. The reasons for this lack of interest in fossils are apparent when one scans the contributors and critical reviewers of ID textbooks such as Of Pandas and People (Davis and Kenyon, 2004, p. iii). Although the ID creationists include 833 834 Donald R. Prothero scientists with backgrounds in biology or chemistry, almost none earned an advanced degree in paleontology or geology from a recognized accredited non- creationist institution (with the possible exception of Kurt Wise, who was a student of Stephen J.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Darwin Matters
    27 THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT DARWIN CELEBRATE DARWIN’S 200TH These recordings are from our Distinguished Lecture Series held on the Caltech Campus in Pasadena. Order on the enclosed form or on www.skeptic.com. Available as indicated as Audio Cassette ($9.95); DVD ($23.95); and audio CD ($15.95) A Darwin Day 200th Birthday Celebration 2009 marks the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s birth on February 12, 1809—the same day as Abraham Lincoln—and the 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of Species on November 24, 1859. Come join us for a special celebration of the life and science of one of the greatest scientists in history. Historian of science Dr. Michael Shermer reviews the remarkable life of Darwin and explain how he arrived at his theory of evolution. Paleontologist and geologist Dr. Donald Prothero gave a brief overview of how evolutionary theory has changed since Darwin’s time. Caltech biologist Dr. Joel Smith explains systems biology which allows us to construct detailed logic maps of the “circuitry” of living organisms known as Regulatory Networks. By comparing Regulatory Networks from different species we can see how the program has changed over the course of evolution, and we can identify the precise changes in DNA sequences that have created those changes. av197DVD (DVD); av197CD (audio CD) Richard Dawkins THE ANCESTOR’S TALE: A Pilgrimage to the Dawnof Evolution Renowned evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins presents an expansive work: a comprehensive look at evolution, ranging from the latest developments in the field to his own provocative views.
    [Show full text]