DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re Chapter 11 Quebecor World (USA) Inc., et al., Case No. 08-10152 (JMP) Jointly Administered Debtors. Honorable James M. Peck GLOBAL NOTES AND STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS, METHODOLOGY, AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING DEBTORS’ SCHEDULES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL AFFAIRS The Schedules of Assets and Liabilities (the “Schedules”) and the Statement of Financial Affairs (the “Statements”) (collectively, the “Schedules and Statements”) filed herewith by the debtors and debtors in possession in the above- captioned cases (collectively, the “Debtors”) were prepared pursuant to section 521 of title 11 of the United States Code (as amended, the “Bankruptcy Code”) and Rule 1007 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”) by management of the Debtors and are unaudited. Unless otherwise indicated in the Schedules or Statements, the information provided is as of the close of business on January 20, 2008. While the Debtors’ management has made every reasonable effort to ensure that the Schedules and Statements are accurate and complete based upon information that was available to them at the time of preparation, inadvertent errors or omissions may have occurred and the subsequent receipt of information may result in material changes to the financial data and other information contained therein. The Debtors have used their best efforts to compile the information set forth in the Schedules and Statements from their books and records maintained in the ordinary course of their businesses. The Debtors reserve their right to amend their Schedules and Statements from time to time as may be necessary or appropriate. Except as noted in the Schedules and Statements, all asset and liability data contained in the Schedules and Statements are stated in U.S. currency as of the close of business on January 20, 2008. These Global Notes and Statement of Limitations, Methodology, and Disclaimer Regarding Debtors’ Schedules of Assets and Liabilities and Statement of Financial Affairs (the “Global Notes”) are incorporated by reference in, and comprise an integral part of, the Schedules and Statements, and should be referred to and reviewed in connection with any review of the Schedules and Statements. Further, these Global Notes are in addition to the specific notes contained in the Debtors’ Schedules and Statements; however, in the event the Schedules and Statements differ from the Global Notes, the Global Notes shall control. 1. Description of the Cases. On January 21, 2008 (the “Petition Date”), the Debtors filed 53 voluntary petitions with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”) for reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code under case numbers 08-10152 (JMP) through 08- 10204 (JMP), and orders for relief were entered by the Bankruptcy Court. The cases have been consolidated for the purpose of joint administration only under Case No. 08-10152 (JMP). The Debtors currently are operating their businesses as debtors in possession under the Bankruptcy Code. 2. Basis of Presentation. For financial reporting purposes, the Debtors’ parent company, Quebecor World Inc. (“QWI”), generally prepares consolidated financial statements, which include financial information for all subsidiaries comprised of debtors and non-debtors. The preparation of the Schedules and Statements required the Debtors to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of liabilities, the disclosures of contingent liabilities, and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from estimates. Some of the Debtors’ scheduled assets and liabilities are unknown and/or unliquidated at this time. In such cases, the amounts are listed as “Unknown” or “Undetermined.” Accordingly, the Schedules and Statements may not reflect the actual aggregate amount of the Debtors’ assets and liabilities. The Debtors have sought to allocate liabilities between prepetition and postpetition periods based on information from research that was conducted in connection with the preparation of the Schedules and Statements. As additional information becomes available and further research is conducted, the allocation of liabilities between prepetition and postpetition periods may change. Each Debtor generally maintains its accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Canada (“GAAP”) and as consistently applied by such Debtor. Given the differences between the information requested in the Schedules and Statements and the financial information utilized under GAAP, the aggregate asset values and claim amounts set forth in the Schedules and Statements do not necessarily reflect the amounts that would be set forth in a balance sheet prepared in accordance with GAAP. Therefore, these Schedules and Statements do not purport to represent financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP nor are they intended to reconcile the financial statements filed by QWI with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 3. General Limitations. The debtors and their affiliates have not previously prepared entity-by-entity financial statements as the Debtors’ parent company, QWI, generally and historically prepares consolidated financial statements, as mentioned above. Accordingly, certain financial information has only been recorded at the consolidated level and not in financial statements of the individual entities. For purposes of the preparation of these Schedules, the assets and liabilities of the individual Debtors have been allocated to the appropriate Debtor - 2 - wherever possible. However, substantial additional analysis would be required to create complete, entity-by-entity financial statements, particularly for certain accounts such as accrued liabilities. In addition, some information would be difficult or impossible to analyze on an entity-by-entity basis, as such analysis would require the review of multiple years’ worth of transactions that have previously been accounted for only on a consolidated basis. 4. Summary of Significant Reporting Policies. The Schedules and Statements have been signed by Mario Saucier, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of QWI. In reviewing and signing the Schedules and Statements, Messr. Saucier has necessarily relied upon the efforts, statements and representations of the accounting and non-accounting personnel located at QWI’s headquarters. Messr. Saucier has not (and could not have) personally verified the accuracy of each such statement and representation, including statements and representations concerning amounts owed to creditors. Each of the Debtors made its best effort to report asset, liability, disbursement, and other information on the appropriate Debtor’s Schedules and Statements. However, the following qualifications and limitations apply to each Debtor’s Schedules and Statements: (a) For most assets and asset classifications, a physical location code is included and maintained in the Debtor’s accounting and financial systems. For assets or asset classification for which a location code is available, such assets or asset classifications are reported on the appropriate Debtor’s Schedules and Statements. For assets or asset classification for which no location code is available, such assets or asset classifications are reported on the Schedules and Statements of Quebecor World (USA) Inc. (“QWUSA”). (b) The Debtors maintain information for most liabilities, most notably the trade and non-trade accounts payable, in a centralized accounts payable system on behalf of all Debtors. However, to the extent the Debtors could determine with a reasonable degree of certainty which Debtor is liable, the liabilities, including the trade and non-trade balances are reported on the Schedules and Statements of the Debtor that is liable for the obligation. (c) Disbursements are made through a centralized and consolidated cash management system that includes checking accounts held in the name of certain Debtors. Therefore, all disbursement information is reported on the Schedules and Statements of the Debtor which holds the relevant bank account. In addition, the Debtors adopted the following conventions in the preparation of the Schedules and Statements. (d) Debtors. The Debtors use a consolidated cash management system through which the Debtors pay substantially all liabilities and expenses. Although - 3 - separate stand-alone accounting records are maintained for all Debtors, within the general ledgers, receipts and disbursements transactions are not available on a Debtor by Debtor basis. (e) Reporting Date. Assets and liabilities reported in the Debtors’ Schedules and Statements are reported as follows: All assets except those reported in Schedules B1, B2 and B3 are reported as of December 29, 2007. Assets reported on Schedules B1, B2 and B3 are reported as of January 20, 2008. In compiling the list of secured claims set forth in Schedule D, the Debtors have relied upon lien searches conducted in January 2008, in addition to information contained in their books and records. (f) Book Value To the extent any asset value is listed herein, unless otherwise indicated, net book values, rather than market values, of the Debtors’ interests in property are reflected on the applicable Schedules and Statements. As applicable, assets that have been fully depreciated or were expensed for accounting purposes and have no net book value, may not be
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 in the United States District Court for the Eastern
    Case 6:10-cv-00676-LED Document 2 Filed 12/16/10 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION GUARDIAN MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Plaintiff, v. (1) ACER AMERICA CORPORATION; (2) APEX DIGITAL, INC.; (3) AT&T INC.; (4) CONN’S INC.; (5) FUJITSU AMERICA, INC.; (6) FUJITSU LIMITED; (7) GAMESTOP CORP.; (8) HAIER AMERICA TRADING, L.L.C.; CIVIL ACTION NO. ___________ (9) HISENSE USA CORPORATION; (10) HOPPER RADIO OF FLORIDA, INC.; (11) IMATION CORP.; (12) J & R ELECTRONICS INC.; (13) LASONIC ELECTRONICS JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CORPORATION; (14) LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.; (15) MEMOREX PRODUCTS, INC.; (16) MICRO CENTER SALES CORPORATION; (17) MICROSOFT CORPORATION; (18) MOTOROLA, INC.; (19) OFFICE DEPOT, INC.; (20) ON CORP US, INC.; (21) PROTON INTERNATIONAL AMERICA, INC.; (22) PROTRON DIGITAL CORPORATION; (23) RENT-A-CENTER, INC.; (24) ROBERT BOSCH, LLC; (25) SKYWORTH ELECTRONICS, INC.; (26) SOUND AROUND INC.; (27) STAPLES, INC.; (28) STARLITE CONSUMER ELECTRONICS (USA) INC.; (29) STARLITE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LTD.; (30) TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.; 1 Case 6:10-cv-00676-LED Document 2 Filed 12/16/10 Page 2 of 32 (31) TIGERDIRECT, INC.; (32) TIVO INC.; (33) TTE TECHNOLOGY, INC.; (34) VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.; (35) VIDEOLAND, LLC; AND (36) VIEWSONIC CORPORATION. Defendants. ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff GUARDIAN MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. files this Original Complaint against the above-named Defendants, alleging as follows: PARTIES 1. Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. (“Guardian”) is a Texas limited partnership. Guardian has its principal place of business in Longview, TX. 2. Upon information and belief, Defendant Acer America Corporation (“Acer”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business located at 333 West San Carlos Street, Suite 1500, San Jose, California 95110.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of SOUTH MIAMI Vendor Listing by Vendor Name
    CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI Vendor Listing by Vendor Name Report Date:11/27/2013 PE ID PE Name 1099 EIN Status 0002954 @ Comm Corporation N AC 0003951 @XI COMPUTER CORP. N AC 0004764 1-866-JUNK-BE-GONE/MIAMI N AC 0000308 10-S SUPPLY N AC 0004997 12 AVENUE COPY SERVICE INC N 59-1950226 AC 0002003 1999 APWA ANNUAL MEETING N AC 0001091 20/20 INSIGHTS INC. Y 65-0505147 AC 0002648 2000 JUNIOR ORANGE BOWL PARADE N AC 0001491 20TH CENTURY PLASTICS N 95-2084551 AC 0002630 3 CMA MEMBERSHIP N AC 0005512 33143 N AC 0001465 500 ROLE MODELS OF EXCELLENCE PROJ. N AC 0004684 911 RESTORATION INC N AC 0000846 A & C CLEANING SERVICE N 0 AC 0004713 A & D FENCING SPECIALIST N 65-0904958 AC 0006006 A & Q FENCE CORPORATION N 65-0835598 AC 0001186 A & R CONCRETE PRODUCTS N AC 0000186 A ABBEY LOCKSMITH CO N AC 0000620 A ADVANCED FIRE N 0 AC 0000623 A B DICK COMPANY N 0 AC 0001500 A BEKA BOOK INC N AC 0005939 A BETTER AIM SEPTIC N 0 AC 0001990 A CONCEPT IN BRONZE INC N AC 0000621 A DRAIN ALL INC N 0 AC 0003889 A FANTASY JUMP N AC 0001041 A KID''S PARTY EXPRESS N 65-0250719 AC 0000616 A LIKELY STORY N 0 AC 0000203 A NAVAS PARTY PRODUCTION N AC 0000619 A SECOND CHANCE INC. N 0 AC 0001312 A T & T N AC 0001593 A T & T N AC 0000622 A TEAM OFFICE PRODUCTS N 0 AC 0003578 A WILLETS-O''NEIL COMPANY N AC 0001405 A WOMAN''S TOUCH STUDIO N 0 AC 0000617 A&C CLEANING SERVICE N 0 AC 0002471 A&D QUALITY LANDSCAPING CORP.
    [Show full text]
  • OSF Vendor File
    PE ID PE Name 2954 @ COMM CORPORATION 3951 @XI COMPUTER CORP. 4764 1‐866‐JUNK‐BE‐GONE/MIAMI 308 10‐S SUPPLY 4997 12 AVENUE COPY SERVICE INC 2648 2000 JUNIOR ORANGE BOWL PARADE 1491 20TH CENTURY PLASTICS 2630 3 CMA MEMBERSHIP 1465 500 ROLE MODELS OF EXCELLENCE PROJ. 4684 911 RESTORATION INC 146 A & A LAWNMORE SERVICE 846 A & C CLEANING SERVICE 4713 A & D FENCING SPECIALIST 6006 A & Q FENCE CORPORATION 1186 A & R CONCRETE PRODUCTS 210 A AABAN LOCKSMITH INC 186 A ABBEY LOCKSMITH CO 620 A ADVANCED FIRE 623 A B DICK COMPANY 1500 A BEKA BOOK INC 5939 A BETTER AIM SEPTIC 1990 A CONCEPT IN BRONZE INC 621 A DRAIN ALL INC 3889 A FANTASY JUMP 1041 A KID''S PARTY EXPRESS 616 A LIKELY STORY 203 A NAVAS PARTY PRODUCTION 619 A SECOND CHANCE INC. 1312 A T & T 1593 A T & T 316 A T & T DO NOT USE"" 622 A TEAM OFFICE PRODUCTS 311 A UNIFORM & SHOE SUPERMARKET 3578 A WILLETS‐O''NEIL COMPANY 1405 A WOMAN''S TOUCH STUDIO 617 A&C CLEANING SERVICE 2471 A&D QUALITY LANDSCAPING CORP. 6005 A‐1 FARGO VAN & STORAGE INC 3957 A‐1 KIDS PARTY EXPRESS 1266 A‐1‐A BOOKSTORE 1884 A‐1‐A EMPLOYMENT OF MIAMI 1234 A‐1‐A IDEAL BUSINESS MACHINES 271 A‐ADVANCED FIRE 2216 A‐TEAM OFFICE PRODUCTS 4171 A. PALMER ROOFING INC. 525 A.A. RUBBER STAMP & SEAL 5444 A.A.C.E. 6010 A.D.A. ENGINEERING INC 486 A.E. ROBERTS CO 804 A.J.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the EASTERN DISTRICT of TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADJUSTACAM LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § Vs
    Case 6:10-cv-00329-JRG Document 762 Filed 08/20/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 9508 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADJUSTACAM LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § vs. § CASE NO. 6:10-CV-329 § AMAZON.COM, INC., et al, § § Defendants. § FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Orders granting the parties’ Joint Motions to Dismiss, the Court hereby enters Final Judgment. Plaintiff Adjustacam LLC filed suit against fifty-nine Defendants in this case on July 2, 2012. Since that time, all Defendants have been dismissed: Amazon.com, Inc. (Docket No. 630); Auditek Corporation (Docket No. 647); Blue Microphones, LLC (Docket No. 492); Baltic Latvian Universal Electronics, LLC d/b/a Blue Microphones, LLC d/b/a Blue Microphone (Docket No. 492); CDW Corporation f/k/a CDW Computer Centers, Inc. (Docket No. 658); CDW, Inc. (Docket No. 658); CDW, LLC (Docket No. 10); Compusa.com, Inc. (Docket No. 620); Cobra Digital, LLC (Docket No. 420); Creative Technology Ltd. (Docket No. 348); Creative Labs, Inc. (Docket No. 560); Dell, Inc. (Docket No. 563); Digital Innovations, LLC (Docket No. 651); Eastman Kodak Company (Docket No. 217); Ezonics Corporation d/ba/ Ezonics Corporation USA d/b/a Ezonics (Docket No. 361); Fry’s Electronics Inc. (Docket No. 675); Gear Head, LLC (Docket No. 665); General Electric Company (Docket No. 8); Hewlett- Packard Company (Docket No. 677); Incomex, Inc. (Docket No. 342); Jasco Products Company LLC d/b/a Jasco Products Company d/b/a Jasco (Docket No. 410); Jwin Electronics Corporation (Docket No. 419); Klip Extreme LLC (Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Print, MGA Entertainment, Digital Domain, Tigerdirect, Hurley, Billabong, Samsung, and Many Others
    Kent R. Raygor Partner T: +1.310.228.3730 1901 Avenue of the Stars F: +1.310.228.3930 Suite 1600 [email protected] Los Angeles, CA 90067 Kent Raygor, a partner in the Century City office, practices in the Business Trial, Intellectual Property, and Entertainment Technology and Advertising groups. Areas of Practice Complex business litigation: Kent handles complex litigation, including class actions and multidistrict litigation, appearing before state and federal trial courts around the country, including the California Courts of Appeal and Supreme Court, Multidistrict Litigation Panel, Ninth Circuit and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and U.S. Supreme Court. ■ Business litigation: Corporate management and partnership disputes in the hedge fund, venture capital, banking, and other industries; consumer class actions, including cases for Gillette, Pier 1, and MillerCoors; complex, high-tech patent litigation for Honeywell, Northrop Grumman, and others; cases with significant constitutional issues arising under the First Amendment, the Reserved Powers Doctrine, Contracts, Equal Protection, and Privacy provisions; multidistrict litigation (MDL) defending clients against numerous copyright, unfair competition, and consumer class action lawsuits consolidated before a single court. ■ Media law litigation and counseling: Emphasis on contract, licensing, distribution, sponsorship, First Amendment, privacy, defamation, and right of publicity litigation; pre-publication clearance analyses for films, documentaries, screenplays, advertising, books, news, and web and mobile content; complex matters for many Fortune 500 companies, including Fox, Disney, ABC, ESPN, Lions Gate, CNET, and Sony Pictures; numerous right of publicity and invasion of privacy cases defending clients against claims by celebrities, including Brad Pitt, Jennifer Aniston, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Dianne Keaton, Michelle Pfeiffer, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Cameron Diaz, Audioslave, Weezer, Bruce Willis, Denzel Washington, Kate Hudson, Zooey Deschanel, and Sandra Bullock.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division Consolidated Work Station Computing, Llc
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION CONSOLIDATED WORK STATION COMPUTING, LLC, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11-CV-696 v. ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR (1) ACER AMERICA CORPORATION; PATENT INFRINGEMENT (2) CDW CORPORATION; (3) CYBERTRON INTERNATIONAL JURY TRIAL DEMANDED INC.; (4) EGENERA, INC.; (5) FREEDOM USA, INC. dba AVADIRECT CUSTOM COMPUTERS; (6) FUJITSU AMERICA, INC.; (7) HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY; (8) HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA INC.; (9) MCAFEE, INC.; (10) NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA; (11) NEXT INTERNATIONAL, INC.; (12) PC CONNECTION EXPRESS, INC.; (13) PC MALL, INC.; (14) SIGNAL MICRO SYSTEMS, INC.; (15) SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, INC.; (16) TIGERDIRECT, INC.; and (17) UNIQUE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.; Defendants. Plaintiff CONSOLIDATED WORK STATION COMPUTING, LLC files this Original Complaint against the above-named defendants, based on its own knowledge with respect to itself and its own actions and based on information and belief as to all other matters, as follows: 1 PARTIES 1. Consolidated Work Station Computing, LLC (“CWSC”) is a Texas limited liability company. 2. Defendant Acer America Corporation (“Acer”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California with a principal place of business located at 333 West San Carlos Street, Suite 1500, San Jose, California 95110. Acer can be served via its registered agent for service of process: CT Corporation System, 350 N. St. Paul St., Suite 2900; Dallas, Texas 75201-4234. 3. Defendant CDW Corporation (“CDW”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with a principal place of business located at 200 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilbert Fiorentino
    Case 1:14-cr-20854-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/20/2014 Page 1 of 12TB Nov 20, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO URT SO UTH ERN DISTRICT OF FLO RIDA 14-20854-CR-COOKE/TORRES CASE NO . 18 U.S.C. j 371 18 U.S.C. j 981(a)(1)(C) UNITED STATES OF AM ERICA VS. GILBERT FIORENTINO , Defendant. / INFO RM ATION The United States Attorney charges that: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS At times material to this Infonnation: Systemax, lnc. (ltsystemax'') was a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business inPort W ashington, New York. Systemax sold personal computers and other consumer electronics through its websites, retail stores and direct mail catalogs. In tiscal year 2010, Systemax had annual sales revenue of approximately $3.6 billion. Systemax was a public company and its comm on stock was traded on the New York Stock Exchange . Systemax was an issuer with a clmss of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and it was obligated to tile reports with the U .S. Securities and Exchange Commission ($1SEC'') pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. TigerDirect was a subsidiary of Systemax with its principal place of business in M iami, Florida. TigerDirect was a part of the Technology Products Group ($1TPG'') of Case 1:14-cr-20854-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/20/2014 Page 2 of 12 Systemax. TPG marketed and sold technology products under several brand names, including TigerDirect, COmPUSA, and Circuit City. Defendant GILBERT FIORENTINO was a resident of Miami, Florida, the Chief Executive Officer of TPG and TigerDirect, and a member of the Board of Directors of Systemax.
    [Show full text]
  • 18 U.S.C. J 1349 26 U.S.C. J 7201 18 U.S.C. J 981(A)(1)(C) Systemax, Inc
    Case 1:14-cr-20025-JEM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/20/2014 Page 1 of 11 NOV 20, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 14-20025-CR-JEM (s)(s) 18 U.S.C. j 1349 26 U.S.C. j 7201 18 U.S.C. j 981(a)(1)(C) UNITED STATES OF AM ERICA VS. CARL FIORENTINO, Defendant. / SECONP SVPERSEDING INFORM ATION The United States Attorney charges that: GENER AL ALLEGATIONS At times material to this Second Superseding lnform ation: Systemax, Inc. (t%systemax'') was a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Port W ashington, New York. Systemax sold personal computers and other consumer electronics through its websites, retail stores and direct mail catalogs. ln tiscal year 2010, Systemax had annual sales revenue of approximately $3.6 billion. Systemax was a public company and its common stock was traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Systemax was an issuer with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Sectuities and Exchange Act of 1934, and it was obligated to file reports with the U .S. Securities and Exchange Commission ($çSEC'') pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. 1 of 11 Case 1:14-cr-20025-JEM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/20/2014 Page 2 of 11 2. TigerDirect was a subsidiary of Systemax with its principal place of business in Miami, Florida. TigerDirect was a part of the Teclmology Products Group ($tTPG'') of Systemax. TPG marktted and sold technology products under several brand names, including TigerDirect, CompUSA, and Circuit Uity.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 1 Of
    Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 1 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 2 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 3 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 4 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 5 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 6 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 7 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 8 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 9 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 10 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 11 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 12 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 13 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 14 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 15 of 543 Case 13-12051-MFW Doc 1 Filed 08/09/13 Page 16 of 543 10-8 RETROFIT INC 415 W MAIN STREET ONTARIO, CA 91762-3845 1ST CHOICE CASH ADVANCE 4805 VIRGINIA BEACH BLVD VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462 21st CENTURY LABORATORIES INC 10437 INNOVATION DRIVE #203 RESEARCH PARK WAUWATOSA, WI 53226 24 SEVEN DISCOVERE, L.L.C.
    [Show full text]
  • PURSUANT to the Provisions of Chapter 501 , Part II of the Florida
    STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF: Case No. L14-3-1081 SYSTEMAX, INC. and TIGERDIRECT, INC. Respondents --------------------I ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE I. PURSUANT to the provisions of Chapter 501 , Part II of the Florida Statutes, Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act ("FDUTPA"), the Office of The Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs (hereinafter referred to as the "Department"), caused an investigation to be made into certain acts and practices of Systemax, Inc. and Tiger Direct, Inc. (collectively hereinafter, "Respondents"). 2. Respondent Tiger Direct, Inc. ("TD") is a Florida corporation with its mailing address and principal place of business registered at 7795 West Flagler Street, Suite 35, Miami, Florida 33144. TD is a reseller of various products including, but not limited to, electronics, computers and computer related goods, and markets and resells those products through its online consumer shopping website, TigerDirect.com (the "Website") and other sales channels, including its 1 Initials a:- three remaining retail stores located in Jefferson, Georgia; Miami, Florida; and Guaynabo, Puerto Rico. 3. The Website operates under a registered Trademark owned by TD. 4. Respondent Systemax, Inc. ("Systemax") is a Delaware Corporation with its mailing address and principal place of business registered at 11 Harbor Park Drive, Port Washington, New York 11050. Systemax is the ultimate parent company of Respondent TD. 5. Respondents make no admission that Respondents violated FDUTPA or any other law, statute or regulation applicable to Respondents or enforced by the Department (collectively, the "Acts"), and have timely complied with the Department's requests for information and have been fully cooperative during the Department's investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tigerdirect Business?
    WHY TIGERDIRECT BUSINESS? For more than 20 years, TigerDirect Business has TIGERDIRECT partnered with businesses and organizations of all types and sizes, providing IT solutions and services, as well as enterprise-grade products from top brands BUSINESS IS like Cisco®, Dell™, HP®, Lenovo®, and Microsoft®. We are in the business of you: your growth, your ALL ABOUT efficiency, your business success — and we’re not satisfied until you are. From the earliest stages of your planning, you can count on having a dedicated Account Manager backed by a team of certified Technical Sales Specialists who will help tailor IT YOU solutions to suit your specific needs. Whether you want to streamline operations or outperform your competition, we are your smart edge. When you work with TigerDirect Business, We are in the business of you: your you’re not just receiving the best and latest IT growth, your efficiency, your business solutions, you’re getting a full-time commitment to success — and we’re not satisfied until make sure that your business can Do More, Better.™ you are. TigerDirect is a subsidiary of Systemax Inc. — a Fortune 1000 company (NYSE: SYX). Systemax is a leading provider of IT solutions and products and industrial products to businesses in both North America and Europe. EMAIL [email protected] CALL 888.222.8300 VISIT WWW.TIGERDIRECT.COM/WHYTDB 3 STRUCTURED TO SUPPORT YOUR BUSINESS TIGERDIRECT 550 550+ ACCOUNT ADVANCED SOLUTIONS NATIONWIDE MANAGERS GROUP DISTRIBUTION BUSINESS 12 TigerDirect’s Business-to-Business sales team has over 20 years of hands-on experience serving the needs of SOFTWARE 12 NORTH AMERICAN WORLDWIDE business clients.
    [Show full text]
  • Vendor Contract
    VENDOR CONTRACT Between '^MfjS^i^ck and (List Vendor or Company Name) THE INTERLOCAL PURCHASING SYSTEM (TIPS) For Refurbished Computers and Equipment #07012215 General Information The contract shall include the contract, the terms and conditions, special terms and conditions, any agreed upon amendments, as well as all of the sections of the solicitation and the awarded vendor's proposal. Once signed, if the awarded vendor's proposal varies or is unclear in any way from the TIPS contract, TIPS, at its sole discretion, will decide which provision will prevail. Other documents to be included are the awarded vendor's proposals, task orders, purchase orders and any adjustments which have been issued. The following pages will constitute the contract between the successful vendors(s) and TIPS. Bidders shall state, in a separate writing, and include with their proposal response, any required exceptions or deviations from these terms, conditions, and specifications. If agreed to by TIPS, they will be incorporated into the final contract. NOTE: The award of this contract to vendor is made following all requirements to meet the Competitively Bid Procurement Laws. The Vendor Contract ("Contract") made and entered into by and between The Interlocal Purchasing System (hereinafter referred to as "TIPS" respectfully) a govemment cooperative purchasing program authori2ed by the Region VIII Education Service Center, having its principal place of residence at 4845 North US Hwy 271, Pittsburg, Texas 75686. This contract consists of the provisions set forth below, including provisions of all Attachments referenced herein. In the event of a conflict between the provisions set forth below and those contained in any Attachment, the provisions set forth shall control.
    [Show full text]