HELLBENDERS! by A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HELLBENDERS! by A 9 ANGLER^ OFFICIAL STATE NOVEMBER, 1937 PUBLICATION * AN G LE R* Vol. 6—No. 11 nt= =*W PUBLISHED MONTHLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA by the BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF FISH ^_ COMMISSIONERS §§§ * * * CHARLES A. FRENCH Ten cents a copy — 50 cents a year Commissioner of Fisheries MEMBERS OF BOARD 111 CHARLES A. FRENCH, Chairman Ellwood City ALEX P. SWEIGART, Editor MILTON L. PEEK South Office Bid K.> Harrisburg, Pa. HARRY E. WEBER Philipsburg SAMUEL J. TRUSCOTT Dalton FRANK J. PENTRACK Johnstown NOTE Subscriptions to the PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER EDGAR W. NICHOLSON should be addressed to the Editor. Submit fee either Philadelphia by check or money order payable to the Common­ KENNETH A. REID wealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. Connellsville Individuals sending cash do so at their own risk. FRED McKEAN New Kensington H. R. STACKHOUSE Secretary to Board PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contribu­ tions and photos of catches from its readers. Proper credit will be given to contributors. All contributions returned if accompanied by first C. R. BULLER class postage. Chief Fish Culturist, Bellefonte n^— —qm IMPORTANT—The Editor should be notified immediately of change in subscriber's address Please give both old and new addresses Permission to reprint will be granted provided proper credit notice is given A 0<^ m \ Vol. 6 No. 11 ^ANGLER/ NOVEMBER, 1937 EDITORIAL MORE GAME FISH NEED MORE FOOD OUR Fish Commission, through its hatcheries, has Here, then, is a condition which must be remedied Ythis year attained a new high in production of small- if we are to enjoy the kind of fishing we hope to mouthed and largemouthed bass. We have been able, achieve under the present program of your Fish Com­ since virtual completion of the new bass farm on Spring mission. Through its program of balanced stocking, the Creek in Centre county, to distribute to suitable Board has endeavored to hold up the food supply in waters one of the finest crops of young bass of both most waters. We have planted minnows, panfishes and species ever developed at the hatcheries operated food fishes, the young of the latter species also fur­ through your License Money. Other species of warm nishing some much needed food for game fishes. It is water game fishes, the wall-eyed pike in particular, necessary also for our fishermen to face the facts and have been stocked heavily. If stocking with game fish do what they can to preserve, to as great a degree as alone could solve the problem of better fishing on our possible, the forage now available in our warmer warmer waters, there would be small cause for concern waters. We simply must recognize the damage now be­ as to the future of their sport by our great army of ing wrought on our bass streams by raking wantonly fishermen. Certainly this year's production record of over riffles for helgramites, and by indiscriminate voracious species of fish life leaves little to be desired scooping of minnows and destruction of thousands too from that angle. And yet, we can stock bass and wall­ small for average live bait fishing purposes. eyed pike far more intensively than has been ever It is also essential that our live bait fishermen take known in the history of fish conservation in Pennsyl­ only enough minnows, stone catfish, crawfish or hel­ vania, natural reproduction by fish already in lakes and gramites to serve for a day's fishing. One dozen streams can increase vastly the supply of young game lively minnows or other bait are far more effective for fish present in our waters—but—poor fishing must still a day's sport than three times that number weakened be inevitable unless we take into consideration the vital through crowding in a bait bucket. necessity of a good supply of natural forage for car­ Conservation of food for game fish is just as impor­ nivorous species. In other words, the crux of better tant as conservation of the game species themselves. fishing for bass and wall-eyed pike rests with the food These two factors are linked inseparably. Show me supply available for these species. the farmer who would turn loose a herd of cattle to graze in a plowed field and expect them to live; yet There is little reason to doubt the disastrous effect not dissimilar forage conditions for game fish exist in of the 1936 flood on the food supply in many of our some waters today. larger and most popular bass waters. While the vital More food for game fish must mean better fishing. growth of vegetation is once more reestablishing itself Let's do our part to improve food conditions in our in some sections of these waters, the loss of food and bass waters. Every effort by the individual fisherman cover which occurred when raging torrents of water must bring good dividends in better sport. scoured the beds of our streams will require years of mending. The condition of many bass taken by our C. A. FRENCH fishermen during the present season has told a mute Commissioner of Fisheries story concerning this crippled food supply. 2 PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER JUNIOR FISHERMEN By BOB RUNK row. There was a time when the Huckleberry Finn type, the farm or small town boy, with his hickory branch rod and cotton string line was the only youthful fisherman on the streams. In this age, however, the family automobile has opened the field to the city lad as well. Now urban and rural youth alike flocks to the Sport. During the past summer we conducted a series of hikes for Y. M. C. A. boys' clubs. On two of these hikes we touched points where the young­ sters could do some fishing. This was an­ nounced prior to the hikes and on both oc­ casions all the lads appeared equipped with tackle of every description. In our boys' camp we found the same prevailing enthu­ siasm. Counselors were continually being drafted as impromptu guides to conduct fishing groups during the free recreational periods. In one camp period a fishing club was organized for the purpose of studying the various species and methods for taking them by rod and line, the "laboratory" be­ ing Clark's Creek, which yielded sunfish, fallfish and pickerel. The results in this club and our city group have convinced us that the average boy will absorb all that one can give him concerning fish and meth­ ods of angling. That there is much to be done in this line PENNSYLVANIA fisherman, recent­ of education is clearly proved by the fact that in a group of twenty-five boys, aged they listened to articles describing the ly returned from a fishing excursion, drama of underwater life, stories of the waAs displaying a sizeable bass to a friend 9-13 years, several of them had fished for a number of years in company with their continuous struggle for existence that goes when two boys ran up to view the catch. on beneath the surface. The description of After a careful scrutiny of the prize with fathers, not one was able to identify from natural color pictures in the new booklet a bass guarding its nest and then eating exclamations of awe at the size of the fish the fry, the picture of a watersnake swal­ they summed up their approval as they "Common Fishes of Pennsylvania" any fish other than the bream or bluegill, the sucker lowing a bass whose girth was far greater strolled away by sighing wistfully, "Gee, I than his own, the description of young pick­ wish we could catch a carp that big!" and the catfish. Of the Fish Laws regulat­ ing size, day's catch, and season they were erel forming chains in their voracious at­ Those two lads are representative of the likewise blissfully ignorant. Openmouthed, tempt to swallow each other—these were thousands of boys who like to fish and do revelations to evoke expressions of wonder. fish on Pennsylvania's streams and ponds. Educators tell us that two of the most From the days when spring fever and its necessary prerequisites in teaching are in­ resulting epidemic of "playing hooky" terest and motivation. It should be a rela­ wreak havoc upon school attendance rec­ tively simple task then for the adult sports­ ords until the streams are covered with man to instruct his youthful counterpart in rafts of floating leaves and ice rims the the ways of sportsmanlike fishing. The in­ shores they are eagerly and constantly terest of the pupil needs little stimulation. questing for fish—all fish and any fish. It A few simple facts, either in picture or matters little to the average youthful angler story, about fishlife are sufficient to set him whether the fish he catches be bass or suck­ well on the road to learning. As to moti­ er, trout or carp, large or small, in season vation—well, show us the small boy who or out of season. It is his prized catch and would not like to catch a "big one." He is must be displayed on his stringer. Almost self motivated, and if you can slip in a any angler can tell of numerous occasions few hints that let him know that most good when his sporting nature has writhed in fishermen are good fish conservationists as torture at the sight of little Jimmie from well you will be sure to garner a few gold the family next door coming home with a stars behind your name on that celestial beaming face and a string of undersized record of all fishermen which old St.
Recommended publications
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • West Branch Subbasin AMD Remediation Strategy
    Publication 254 West Branch Susquehanna Subbasin May 2008 AMD Remediation Strategy: West Branch Susquehanna Background, Data Assessment River Task Force and Method Development Despite the enormous legacy ■ INTRODUCTION Pristine setting along the West Branch Susquehanna River. of pollution from abandoned mine The West Branch Susquehanna drainage (AMD) in the West Subbasin, draining a 6,978-square-mile Branch Susquehanna Subbasin, area in northcentral Pennsylvania, is the there has been mounting support largest of the six major subbasins in and enthusiasm for a fully restored the Susquehanna River Basin (Figure 1). watershed. Under the leadership The West Branch Susquehanna of Governor Edward G. Rendell Subbasin is one of extreme contrasts. While and with support from it has some of the Commonwealth’s Trout Unlimited, Pennsylvania most pristine and treasured waterways, Department of Environmental including 1,249 miles of Exceptional Protection Secretary Kathleen Value streams and scenic forestlands and mountains, it also unfortunately M. Smith McGinty established the West bears the legacy of past Branch Susquehanna River Task unregulated mining. With Abandoned mine lands in Clearfield County. Force (Task Force) in 2004. 1,205 miles of waterways The goal of the Task Force is to impaired by AMD, it is the assist and advise the department and most AMD-impaired region its partners as they work toward of the entire Susquehanna the long-term goal to remediate the River Basin (Figure 2). At its most degraded region’s AMD. sites, the West Branch The Task Force is comprised Susquehanna River contains of state, federal, and regional acidity concentrations of agencies, Trout Unlimited, and nearly 200 milligrams per other conservation and watershed liter (mg/l), and iron and aluminum concentrations of organizations (members are identified A.
    [Show full text]
  • Northumberland County
    NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY START BRIDGE SD MILES PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT TYPE TITLE DESCRIPTION COST PERIOD COUNT COUNT IMPROVED Bridge replacement on Township Road 480 over Mahanoy Creek in West Cameron BASE Bridge Replacement Township Road 480 over Mahanoy Creek Township 3 $ 2,120,000 1 1 0 Bridge Replacement on State Route 1025 (Shakespeare Road) over Chillisquaque BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 1025 over Chillisquaque Creek Creek in East Chillisquaque Township, Northumberland County 1 $ 1,200,000 1 1 0 BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 4022 over Boile Run Bridge replacement on State Route 4022 over Boile Run in Lower Augusta Township 1 $ 195,000 1 0 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 2001 over Little Roaring Creek in Rush BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 2001 over Little Roaring Creek Township 1 $ 180,000 1 1 0 Bridge replacement on PA 405 over Norfolk Southern Railroad in West BASE Bridge Replacement PA 405 over Norfolk Southern Railroad Chillisquaque Township 1 $ 2,829,000 1 1 0 BASE Bridge Rehabilitation PA 61 over Shamokin Creek Bridge rehabilitation on PA 61 over Shamokin Creek in Coal Township 1 $ 850,000 1 0 0 Bridge rehabilitation on PA 45 over Chillisquaque Creek in East Chillisquaque & BASE Bridge Rehabilitation PA 45 over Chillisquaque Creek West Chillisquaque Townships 2 $ 1,700,000 1 0 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 2022 over Tributary to Shamokin Creek in BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 2022 over Tributary to Shamokin Creek Shamokin Township 3 $ 240,000 1 0 0 BASE Bridge Replacement Township Road 631 over
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 93, Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Ch. 93 WATER QUALITY STANDARDS 25 CHAPTER 93. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 93.1. Definitions. 93.2. Scope. 93.3. Protected water uses. 93.4. Statewide water uses. ANTIDEGRADATION REQUIREMENTS 93.4a. Antidegradation. 93.4b. Qualifying as High Quality or Exceptional Value Waters. 93.4c. Implementation of antidegradation requirements. 93.4d. Processing of petitions, evaluations and assessments to change a designated use. 93.5. [Reserved]. WATER QUALITY CRITERIA 93.6. General water quality criteria. 93.7. Specific water quality criteria. 93.8. [Reserved]. 93.8a. Toxic substances. 93.8b. Metals criteria. 93.8c. Human health and aquatic life criteria for toxic substances. 93.8d. Development of site-specific water quality criteria. 93.8e. Special criteria for the Great Lakes System. DESIGNATED WATER USES AND WATER QUALITY CRITERIA 93.9. Designated water uses and water quality criteria. 93.9a. Drainage List A. 93.9b. Drainage List B. 93.9c. Drainage List C. 93.9d. Drainage List D. 93.9e. Drainage List E. 93.9f. Drainage List F. 93.9g. Drainage List G. 93.9h. Drainage List H. 93.9i. Drainage List I. 93.9j. Drainage List J. 93.9k. Drainage List K. 93.9l. Drainage List L.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96
    [Show full text]
  • TECHNIQUES for ESTIMATING MAGNITUDE and FREQUENCY of PEAK FLOWS for PENNSYLVANIA STREAMS by Marla H
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING MAGNITUDE AND FREQUENCY OF PEAK FLOWS FOR PENNSYLVANIA STREAMS by Marla H. Stuckey and Lloyd A. Reed Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4189 prepared in cooperation with PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of product names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 840 Market Street Box 25286 Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 17043-1586 Denver, Colorado 80225-0286 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS ii CONTENTS Page Abstract . .1 Introduction . .1 Purpose and scope. .2 Previous investigations. .2 Development of flood-frequency prediction equations . .2 Description of stations used. .2 Basin characteristics used in equation development . .4 Regression analysis and resultant equations. .7 Limitations of regression equations . .12 Techniques for estimating magnitude and frequency of peak flows . .15 Summary and conclusions . .19 References cited . .19 Appendix 1. Basin characteristics for streamflow-gaging stations used in the development of the regional regression equations . .22 Appendix 2. Flood-flow frequencies computed from streamflow-gaging data and regression equations for streamflow-gaging stations used in analysis . .33 ILLUSTRATIONS Figures 1-3. Maps showing: 1. Streamflow-gaging stations used in development of flood-flow regression equations for Pennsylvania streams . 3 2. Carbonate regions in Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Report
    2015 Associate Directors Dave Swank Retired Well Driller Since 1976 Staff Judy Becker Dr. Blair Carbaugh 2015 Directors District Manager Retired Professor, Lockhaven University Dave Crowl Former NCCD Board Member Chairman, Public Director Shirley Snyder Since 2006 Since 2006 Administrative Assistant Albert Mabus Leon Wertz Jaci Harner Manager of Geology/Environment, Vice‐Chairman, Farmer Director Watershed Specialist Eastern Industries, Inc. Since 2000 Former NCCD Board Member Since 2008 Michael McCleary Richard Shoch Erosion and Sediment Commissioner Director Technician Ted Carodiskey Since 2012 Little Shamokin Creek Watershed Association, Secretary Nathan Brophy Since 2010 John Kopp Agricultural Conservation Farmer Director Technician Since 2004 John Pfleegor Farmer Michael Erdley Former NCCD Board Member Since 2013 Public Director Since 2008 Michael Hubler Retired District Manager of the Dauphin Richard Daniels County Conservation District Farmer Director Since 2014 Since 2012 Gary Truckenmiller Farmer Director Since 2013 Left to right: Dave Crowl, Leon Wertz, Gary Truckenmiller, Richard Daniels, Michael Hubler, John Kopp, Richard Shoch EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PROGRAM The NCCD administers the Chapter 102 Erosion Control program through a signed delegation agreement with the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Under Chapter 102 delegation, NCCD conducts the following program responsibilities: community outreach, permit application receipt & review, permit approval or denial, consultation, site monitoring and final
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of William Colbert for the Northumberland, Wyoming And
    Introduction 3 Introduction: The Man and His Journal Early Methodist Episcopal circuit rider William Colbert (1764-1833) served circuits in Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware, and Virginia. He was admitted on trial in 1790 1 and into full connection in 1792, at which time he was also ordained a deacon. Colbert was ordained an elder in 1795. He served most of his time as a traveling minister and retired from the itinerancy in 1811. William Colbert was born near Baltimore in Poolesville MD on April 20, 1764. Historian George Peck wrote in 1860 2 that Colbert was remembered by those who heard him preach for his intolerance of noisy children, crowded barns and other unfavorable meeting conditions. He was, however, a dedicated man of God and served with distinction as a circuit rider and district superintendent (or, as it was then called, presiding elder). In November 1804 William Colbert married Elizabeth Stroud (1784- 1849), whose parents were the original founders of Stroudsburg PA. He died June 16, 1833, in Stroudsburg PA. William Colbert kept a journal of his travels – which ranks with Francis Asbury’s as one of the earliest definitive records of American Methodism and its circuits. While a three-volume edited, indexed and annotated transcription of Asbury’s journal has been published, no one has yet undertaken that task for Colbert’s journal. The original journal and a typewritten transcription are prized possessions within the special collections at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary in Evanston IL. In 1957, the Library of Congress microfilmed the typewritten copy. In 1964 the Central Pennsylvania Conference purchased a microfilm copy of the journal from the LOC.
    [Show full text]
  • Chillisquaque Creek Headwaters Watershed Sediment TMDL Montour and Columbia Counties, Pennsylvania
    Chillisquaque Creek Headwaters Watershed Sediment TMDL Montour and Columbia Counties, Pennsylvania Prepared by: Final Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Table 1. Summary of Annual Average TMDL (TMDLAvg) Variables for the Chillisquaque Creek Headwaters Watershed ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 th Table 2. Summary of 99 Percentile Daily Loading TMDL (TMDLMax) Variables for the Chillisquaque Creek Headwaters Watershed ............................................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Table 3. Aquatic-Life Impaired Stream Segments in the Chillisquaque Creek Headwaters Watershed per the 2018 Final Pennsylvania Integrated Report ....................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 1. Chillisquaque Creek Headwaters Watershed. ............................................................................................ 4 Table 4. Existing NPDES-Permitted Discharges
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Response to Catastrophic Flooding in North-Central Pennsylvania from Tropical Storm Lee (September 2011): GEOSPHERE; V
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Geomorphic response to catastrophic flooding in north-central Pennsylvania from Tropical Storm Lee (September 2011): GEOSPHERE; v. 12, no. 1 Intersection of fluvial disequilibrium and the legacy of logging doi:10.1130/GES01180.1 R. Craig Kochel1, Benjamin R. Hayes2, Jason Muhlbauer1, Zac Hancock1, and Darin Rockwell1 32 figures; 6 tables; 7 supplemental files 1Department of Geology & Environmental Geosciences, Bucknell University, 1 Dent Drive, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania 17837, USA 2Bucknell Center for Sustainability & the Environment, Bucknell University, 1 Dent Drive, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania 17837, USA CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] ABSTRACT floodplain elevations which promoted avulsion and chute formation. Based CITATION: Kochel, R.C., Hayes, B.R., Muhlbauer, on preflood and postflood geomorphic mapping, >6,700,000 m3 of gravel were J., Hancock, Z., and Rockwell, D., 2016, Geomor- phic response to catastrophic flooding in north- More than 25 cm of rainfall from Tropical Storm Lee (TS Lee) over 2 days mobilized during the flood across 4 watersheds. Mobilization of logging leg- central Pennsylvania from Tropical Storm Lee (Sep- in September 2011 resulted in catastrophic flooding (U.S. Geological Survey acy sediment is occurring as pulses of gravel move downstream episodically. tember 2011): Intersection of fluvial disequilibrium estimated recurrence interval >100 yr) on several Susquehanna River tribu- This paper demonstrates the important influences of drainage basin mor- and the legacy of logging: Geosphere, v. 12, no. 1, p. 305–345, doi:10.1130/GES01180.1. taries emanating from the Appalachian Plateau in north-central Pennsylvania phometry (e.g., ruggedness number) and fluvial history (land use and geo- (USA). Helicopter photography and field work were used to prepare a detailed morphic) in understanding current channel dynamics and basin response to Received 13 February 2015 geographic information system database of geomorphic response to the flood heavy precipitation and flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes May Compete for Food Resources; Exotic Mussels May Impact Soft Substrate and Vegetation Growth
    2 0 1 5 – 2 0 2 5 Species of Greatest Conservation Need Species Accounts Appendix 1.4E-Fish Fish Species of Greatest Conservation Need Maps: Physiographic Provinces and HUC Watersheds Species Accounts (Click species name below or bookmark to navigate to species account) FISH Ohio Lamprey Tonguetied Minnow Tadpole Madtom Northern Brook Lamprey Cutlip Minnow Margined Madtom Mountain Brook Lamprey Bigmouth Shiner Brindled Madtom Least Brook Lamprey Redfin Shiner Northern Madtom Shortnose Sturgeon Allegheny Pearl Dace Cisco Lake Sturgeon Hornyhead Chub Brook Trout Atlantic Sturgeon Comely Shiner Central Mudminnow Paddlefish Bridle Shiner Eastern Mudminnow Spotted Gar River Shiner Burbot Bowfin Ghost Shiner Allegheny Burbot American Eel Ironcolor Shiner Brook Stickleback Blueback Herring Blackchin Shiner Threespine Stickleback Hickory Shad Swallowtail Shiner Checkered Sculpin Alewife Longnose Sucker Banded Sunfish American Shad Bigmouth Buffalo Warmouth Northern Redbelly Dace Spotted Sucker Longear Sunfish Southern Redbelly Dace White Catfish Eastern Sand Darter Redside Dace Black Bullhead Iowa Darter Streamline Chub Blue Catfish Spotted Darter Gravel Chub Mountain Madtom Tessellated Darter FISH, CONTINUED Tippecanoe Darter Chesapeake Logperch Shield Darter Variegate Darter Longhead Darter The following Physiographic Province and HUC Watershed maps are presented here for reference with conservation actions identified in the species accounts. Species account authors identified appropriate Physiographic Provinces or HUC Watershed (Level 4, 6, 8, 10, or statewide) for specific conservation actions to address identified threats. HUC watersheds used in this document were developed from the Watershed Boundary Dataset, a joint project of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Environmental Protection Agency.
    [Show full text]