Montour County

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Montour County MONTOUR COUNTY START BRIDGE SD PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT TYPE TITLE DESCRIPTION COST PERIOD COUNT COUNT Bridge replacement on Township Road 324 over Chillisquaque Creek in Liberty BASE Bridge Replacement Township Road 324 over Chillisquaque Creek Township 1 $ 1,160,000 1 1 BASE Bridge Replacement Township Road 417 over Beaver Run Bridge replacement on Township Road 417 over Beaver Run in Limestone Township 2 $ 920,000 1 1 Bridge replacement on State Route 1011 over Tributary to Chillisquaque Creek in BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 1011 over Tributary to Chillisquaque Creek Anthony Township 1 $ 195,000 1 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 1006 (Preserve Road) over Branch of BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 1006 over Branch of Chillisquaque Creek Chillisquaque Creek in Anthony Township 1 $ 1,150,000 1 1 BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 1007 over Mud Creek Bridge replacement on State Route 1007 over Mud Creek in Derry Township 1 $ 220,000 1 0 Resurface US 11 from Clinic Road to Columbia County Line in Mahoning and Cooper BASE Resurface From Clinic Road to Columbia County Line Townships 1 $ 1,830,000 2 0 Bridge preservation on PA 487 (Red Rock Rd), State Route 2007 (Columbia Hill Rd), BASE Bridge Preservation Columbia County Bridge Preservation Group Project and US 15 in Orange, Benton, Valley, and White Deer Townships 1 $ 1,700,000 4 0 Resurface Interstate 80 Eastbound from PA 54 to Columbia County Line in Valley BASE Resurface From PA 54 to Columbia County Line and West Hemlock Townships 1 $ 2,640,000 3 0 BASE Resurface From Northumberland County Line to PA 45 Resurface PA 642 from Northumberland County Line to PA 45 in Liberty Township 2 $ 887,995 0 0 Resurface PA 642 from Interstate 80 to Mahoning Creek in Valley and Derry BASE Resurface From Interstate 80 to Mahoning Creek Townships 3 $ 857,549 0 0 Resurface PA 642 from Mahoning Creek to Columbia County Line in Derry and West BASE Resurface From Mahoning Creek to Columbia County Line Hemlock Townships 2 $ 603,583 0 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 2102 (Susquehanna Road) over Tributary to BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 2102 over Tributary to Susquehanna River Susquehanna River in Mayberry Township 1 $ 180,000 1 0 Township Road 360 over Middle Branch of Chillisquaque Bridge replacement on Township Road 360 over Middle Branch of Chillisquaque BASE Bridge Replacement Creek Creek in Anthony Township 2 $ 630,000 1 1 Resurface PA 254 from Cromely Drive to the Columbia County Line in Derry BASE Resurface From Cromely Drive to Columbia County Line Township 2 $ 525,000 0 0 Resurface PA 254 from Northumberland County Line to Laidacker Road in BASE Resurface From Northumberland County Line to Laidacker Road Limestone Township 3 $ 900,000 0 0 Roadway restoration on Interstate 80 Eastbound from Chillisquaque Creek to PA 54 BASE Rehabilitation From Chillisquaque Creek to PA 54 in Liberty and Valley Townships 1 $ 2,540,000 3 0 BASE Intersection Improvement PA 54 and PA 642 Intersection Improvements PA 54 and PA 642 Intersection Improvement 1 $ 900,000 0 0 BASE Bridge Replacement PA 54 over Stony Brook Bridge replacement on PA 54 over Stony Brook in Derry Township 2 $ 235,000 1 0 BASE Bridge Replacement PA 254 over Mud Creek Bridge replacement on PA 254 over Mud Creek in Derry Township 2 $ 235,000 1 0 BASE Bridge Replacement PA 642 over Tributary to Mahoning Creek Bridge replacement on PA 642 over Tributary to Mahoning Creek in Derry Township 2 $ 240,000 1 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 3007 over Tributary to Mauses Creek in Liberty BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 3007 over Tributary to Mauses Creek Township 2 $ 240,000 1 0 Bridge Painting on US 11 over Fishing Creek in the Town of Bloomsburg, State Route 118 over the East Branch of Fishing Creek in Sugarloaf Township, State Route 339 over Beaver Run in Beaver Township, State Route 1022 over the Old Channel of BASE Bridge Preservation Columbia and Montour Counties Bridge Painting Fishing Creek in Fishing Creek Township in Columbia and Montour Counties 3 $ 1,001,000 7 0 From Northumberland County Line to Chillisquaque Resurface Interstate 80 Eastbound from Northumberland County Line to BASE Resurface Creek Chillisquaque Creek in Liberty Township 3 $ 367,000 0 0 Bridge rehabilitation on Interstate 80 Westbound over Mahoning Creek in Valley BASE Bridge Rehabilitation Interstate 80 Westbound over Mahoning Creek Township 3 $ 650,000 1 0 BASE Bridge Replacement PA 254 over Tributary to Mud Creek Bridge replacement on PA 254 over Tributary to Mud Creek in Derry Township 3 $ 240,000 1 0 BASE Bridge Replacement PA 254 over Limestone Run Bridge replacement on PA 254 over Limestone Run in Limestone Township 3 $ 1,920,000 1 1 Bridge replacement on PA 642 over Beaver Run (1.5 miles East of Village of BASE Bridge Replacement PA 642 over Beaver Run #1 Mooresburg) in Liberty Township 3 $ 240,000 1 0 Page 1 of 6 MONTOUR COUNTY START BRIDGE SD PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT TYPE TITLE DESCRIPTION COST PERIOD COUNT COUNT Bridge replacement on PA 642 over Beaver Run (2 miles East of Village of BASE Bridge Replacement PA 642 over Beaver Run #2 Pottsgrove) in Liberty Township 3 $ 240,000 1 0 From PA 254 to State Route 1002 (Strawberry Ridge Resurface State Route 1003 (PP & L Road) from PA 254 to State Route 1002 BASE Resurface Road) (Strawberry Ridge Road) in Derry Township 1 $ 142,601 0 0 From State Route 1002 (Strawberry Ridge Road) to PA Resurface State Route 1003 (PP & L Road) from State Route 1002 (Strawberry Ridge BASE Resurface 44 Road) to PA 44 in Derry and Anthony Townships 1 $ 526,024 0 0 Resurface State Route 1003 (Muncy Exchange Road) from PA 44 to Lycoming BASE Resurface Form PA 44 to Lycoming County Line County Line in Anthony Township 2 $ 702,818 0 0 From State Route 1002 (Strawberry Ridge Road) to Resurface State Route 1009 (Stamm Road) from State Route 1002 (Strawberry BASE Resurface Derry Township Line Ridge Road) to Anthony Township Line in Derry Township 1 $ 30,135 0 0 Resurface State Route 2001 (Cameltown Hill Road) from McCracken Road to Derry BASE Resurface From McCracken Road to Derry Township Line Township Line in Valley Township 1 $ 283,865 0 0 Resurface State Route 2005 (Kaseville Road) from State Route 2008 (Bloom Road) to BASE Resurface From Bloom Road to Frosty Valley Road State Route 2012 (Frosty Valley Road) in Mahoning and Valley Townships 3 $ 337,468 0 0 Resurface State Route 2006 (Market Street) from Pump House Road to Clinic Road BASE Resurface From Pump House Road to Clinic Road in Danville Borough and Mahoning Township 1 $ 56,940 0 0 Resurface State Route 2007 (Columbia Hill Road) from PA 642 to State Route 2012 BASE Resurface From PA 642 to State Route 2012 (Frosty Valley Road) (Frosty Valley Road) in Valley Township 3 $ 357,540 0 0 Mill and Resurface State Route 2008 (Bloom Road) from Cherry Street to Copper BASE Resurface From Cherry Street to Copper Township Line Township Line Danville Borough and Mahoning Township 3 $ 800,000 0 0 Resurface State Route 2008 (Bloom Road) from Jade Avenue to Byrd Avenue in BASE Resurface From Jade Avenue to Byrd Avenue Mahoning Township 3 $ 231,200 0 0 From Northumberland County Line to State Route 2109 Resurface State Route 2111 (Sharp Ridge Road) from Northumberland County Line BASE Resurface (High Road) to State Route 2109 (High Road) in Mayberry Township 3 $ 307,202 0 0 Resurface State Route 2111 (Sharp Ridge Road) from State Route 2109 (High Road) BASE Resurface From High Road to Susquehanna Road to State Route 2102 (Susquehanna Road) in Mayberry Township 2 $ 390,360 0 0 Resurface State Route 3003 (Narehood Road) from State Route 3012 (Mexico Road) BASE Resurface From State Route 3012 (Mexico Road) to PA 254 to PA 254 in Liberty and Limestone Townships 2 $ 103,590 0 0 Resurface State Route 3009 (Old Valley School Road) from PA 642 to PA 54 in Valley BASE Resurface From PA 642 to PA 54 Township 1 $ 81,150 0 0 BASE Bridge Removal Township Road 392 over Mud Creek Bridge Removal on Township Road 392 over Mud Creek in Derry Township 3 $ 500,000 1 1 Township Road 396 over East Branch Chillisquaque Bridge replacement on Township Road 396 over East Branch Chillisquaque Creek in BASE Bridge Replacement Creek Derry Township 3 $ 1,320,000 1 1 BASE Resurface From PA 54 to Mud Creek Resurface PA 254 from PA 54 (Continental Blvd.) to Mud Creek in Derry Township 1 $ 475,000 0 0 BASE Resurface From PA 54 to Interstate 80 Resurface PA 642 from PA 54 to Interstate 80 in Valley Township 1 $ 430,000 0 0 BASE Resurface From US 11 to Front Street Resurface SR 2054 (Mill Street) from US 11 to Front Street in Danville Borough 2 $ 700,000 0 0 Bridge rehabilitation on Interstate 80 east bound over State Route 54 in Valley BASE Bridge Rehabilitation I 80 over PA 54 Township 3 $ 1,350,000 1 0 BASE $ 32,573,020 38 7 Bridge replacement on Township Road 371 over Indian Run Creek in Valley DOI Bridge Replacement Township Road 371 over Indian Run Creek Township 1 $ 1,120,000 1 1 Bridge replacement on State Route 1006 over Branch of Chillisquaque Creek in DOI Bridge Replacement State Route 1006 over Branch of Chillisquaque Creek Anthony Township 3 $ 1,420,000 1 1 From State Route 2007 (Columbia Hill Road) to County Resurface State Route 2012 (Frosty Valley Road) from State Route 2007 (Columbia DOI Resurface Line Road Hill Road) to County Line Road in Valley and West Hemlock Townships 1 $ 189,496 0 0 Resurface State Route 2109 (High Road) from PA 54 to State Route 2111 (Sharp DOI Resurface From PA 54 to State Route 2111 (Sharp Ridge Road) Ridge Road) in Mayberry Township 1 $ 305,689 0 0 Page 2 of 6
Recommended publications
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • West Branch Subbasin AMD Remediation Strategy
    Publication 254 West Branch Susquehanna Subbasin May 2008 AMD Remediation Strategy: West Branch Susquehanna Background, Data Assessment River Task Force and Method Development Despite the enormous legacy ■ INTRODUCTION Pristine setting along the West Branch Susquehanna River. of pollution from abandoned mine The West Branch Susquehanna drainage (AMD) in the West Subbasin, draining a 6,978-square-mile Branch Susquehanna Subbasin, area in northcentral Pennsylvania, is the there has been mounting support largest of the six major subbasins in and enthusiasm for a fully restored the Susquehanna River Basin (Figure 1). watershed. Under the leadership The West Branch Susquehanna of Governor Edward G. Rendell Subbasin is one of extreme contrasts. While and with support from it has some of the Commonwealth’s Trout Unlimited, Pennsylvania most pristine and treasured waterways, Department of Environmental including 1,249 miles of Exceptional Protection Secretary Kathleen Value streams and scenic forestlands and mountains, it also unfortunately M. Smith McGinty established the West bears the legacy of past Branch Susquehanna River Task unregulated mining. With Abandoned mine lands in Clearfield County. Force (Task Force) in 2004. 1,205 miles of waterways The goal of the Task Force is to impaired by AMD, it is the assist and advise the department and most AMD-impaired region its partners as they work toward of the entire Susquehanna the long-term goal to remediate the River Basin (Figure 2). At its most degraded region’s AMD. sites, the West Branch The Task Force is comprised Susquehanna River contains of state, federal, and regional acidity concentrations of agencies, Trout Unlimited, and nearly 200 milligrams per other conservation and watershed liter (mg/l), and iron and aluminum concentrations of organizations (members are identified A.
    [Show full text]
  • Northumberland County
    NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY START BRIDGE SD MILES PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT TYPE TITLE DESCRIPTION COST PERIOD COUNT COUNT IMPROVED Bridge replacement on Township Road 480 over Mahanoy Creek in West Cameron BASE Bridge Replacement Township Road 480 over Mahanoy Creek Township 3 $ 2,120,000 1 1 0 Bridge Replacement on State Route 1025 (Shakespeare Road) over Chillisquaque BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 1025 over Chillisquaque Creek Creek in East Chillisquaque Township, Northumberland County 1 $ 1,200,000 1 1 0 BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 4022 over Boile Run Bridge replacement on State Route 4022 over Boile Run in Lower Augusta Township 1 $ 195,000 1 0 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 2001 over Little Roaring Creek in Rush BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 2001 over Little Roaring Creek Township 1 $ 180,000 1 1 0 Bridge replacement on PA 405 over Norfolk Southern Railroad in West BASE Bridge Replacement PA 405 over Norfolk Southern Railroad Chillisquaque Township 1 $ 2,829,000 1 1 0 BASE Bridge Rehabilitation PA 61 over Shamokin Creek Bridge rehabilitation on PA 61 over Shamokin Creek in Coal Township 1 $ 850,000 1 0 0 Bridge rehabilitation on PA 45 over Chillisquaque Creek in East Chillisquaque & BASE Bridge Rehabilitation PA 45 over Chillisquaque Creek West Chillisquaque Townships 2 $ 1,700,000 1 0 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 2022 over Tributary to Shamokin Creek in BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 2022 over Tributary to Shamokin Creek Shamokin Township 3 $ 240,000 1 0 0 BASE Bridge Replacement Township Road 631 over
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 93, Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Ch. 93 WATER QUALITY STANDARDS 25 CHAPTER 93. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 93.1. Definitions. 93.2. Scope. 93.3. Protected water uses. 93.4. Statewide water uses. ANTIDEGRADATION REQUIREMENTS 93.4a. Antidegradation. 93.4b. Qualifying as High Quality or Exceptional Value Waters. 93.4c. Implementation of antidegradation requirements. 93.4d. Processing of petitions, evaluations and assessments to change a designated use. 93.5. [Reserved]. WATER QUALITY CRITERIA 93.6. General water quality criteria. 93.7. Specific water quality criteria. 93.8. [Reserved]. 93.8a. Toxic substances. 93.8b. Metals criteria. 93.8c. Human health and aquatic life criteria for toxic substances. 93.8d. Development of site-specific water quality criteria. 93.8e. Special criteria for the Great Lakes System. DESIGNATED WATER USES AND WATER QUALITY CRITERIA 93.9. Designated water uses and water quality criteria. 93.9a. Drainage List A. 93.9b. Drainage List B. 93.9c. Drainage List C. 93.9d. Drainage List D. 93.9e. Drainage List E. 93.9f. Drainage List F. 93.9g. Drainage List G. 93.9h. Drainage List H. 93.9i. Drainage List I. 93.9j. Drainage List J. 93.9k. Drainage List K. 93.9l. Drainage List L.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT MS4 Requirements Table
    DRAFT MS4 Requirements Table Anticipated Obligations for Subsequent NPDES Permit Term MS4 Name NPDES ID Individual Permit Impaired Downstream Waters or Requirement(s) Other Cause(s) of Required? Applicable TMDL Name Impairment Adams County ABBOTTSTOWN BORO No Beaver Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) BERWICK TWP No Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) Beaver Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) BUTLER TWP No Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) CONEWAGO TWP No South Branch Conewago Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) Plum Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) CUMBERLAND TWP No Willoughby Run Appendix E-Organic Enrichment/Low D.O., Siltation (5) Rock Creek Appendix E-Nutrients (5) Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) GETTYSBURG BORO No Stevens Run Appendix E-Nutrients, Siltation (5) Unknown Toxicity (5) Rock Creek Appendix E-Nutrients (5) Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) HAMILTON TWP No Beaver Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) MCSHERRYSTOWN BORO No Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) Plum Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) South Branch Conewago Creek Appendix E-Siltation (5) MOUNT PLEASANT TWP No Chesapeake Bay Nutrients/Sediment Appendix D-Nutrients, Siltation (4a) NEW OXFORD BORO No
    [Show full text]
  • TECHNIQUES for ESTIMATING MAGNITUDE and FREQUENCY of PEAK FLOWS for PENNSYLVANIA STREAMS by Marla H
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING MAGNITUDE AND FREQUENCY OF PEAK FLOWS FOR PENNSYLVANIA STREAMS by Marla H. Stuckey and Lloyd A. Reed Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4189 prepared in cooperation with PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of product names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 840 Market Street Box 25286 Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 17043-1586 Denver, Colorado 80225-0286 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS ii CONTENTS Page Abstract . .1 Introduction . .1 Purpose and scope. .2 Previous investigations. .2 Development of flood-frequency prediction equations . .2 Description of stations used. .2 Basin characteristics used in equation development . .4 Regression analysis and resultant equations. .7 Limitations of regression equations . .12 Techniques for estimating magnitude and frequency of peak flows . .15 Summary and conclusions . .19 References cited . .19 Appendix 1. Basin characteristics for streamflow-gaging stations used in the development of the regional regression equations . .22 Appendix 2. Flood-flow frequencies computed from streamflow-gaging data and regression equations for streamflow-gaging stations used in analysis . .33 ILLUSTRATIONS Figures 1-3. Maps showing: 1. Streamflow-gaging stations used in development of flood-flow regression equations for Pennsylvania streams . 3 2. Carbonate regions in Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • N.Montour Comp Planv2
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The eleven chapters of this comprehensive plan provide a written and graphic description and analysis of current conditions, resources, and capabilities throughout Anthony, Derry, Liberty, Limestone and West Hemlock Townships in Montour County. In addition, the Plan presents future growth policies, recommendations and strategies to address identified concerns and manage the municipalities’ assets for the future. The document’s intent is to provide for future growth in the Planning Area in such a way that will preserve the Area’s rural, agricultural character and quality of life. The Northern Montour Regional Planning Commission, at the direction of the Boards of Supervisors of Anthony, Derry, Liberty, Limestone and West Hemlock Townships, was assigned the primary responsibility for development of the Plan. In June of 1992 a Professional Planning Consultant (Landplan, Inc.) was selected to assist the Planning Commission with the project. Work began in August of that year and has culminated with the development of this document. During the process, a Public Opinion Survey was distributed to all property owners residing in the five Study Area municipalities to solicit their input on various aspects of the Plan. The various elements of the Plan are interrelated from beginning to end. The background chapters (1-9) present and evaluate available resources and land use activities in the Planning Area; the goals (Chapter 10) set forth the municipalities’ desires regarding the type, location, and intensity of future development of the Area; the objective statements (following each goal in Chapter 10) describe the intent or purpose of each goal; and the recommendations (also in Chapter 10) illustrate specific ways in which the goals may be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Twelve Year Program List of Projects Adopted
    State Transportation Commission 2017 TWELVE YEAR PROGRAM LIST OF PROJECTS Adopted Adopted by the State Transportation Commission on August 11, 2016 2017 Twelve YEAR PROGRAM A Key to the Twelve Year Program The following is an explanation of the codes used in the single-line computerized printout of the Twelve Year Transportation Program. The items in the heading are explained below. The column definitions proceed from left to right, top to bottom. Keys to the TYP This groups the projects by location under the regional metropolitan planning Section Heading organizations or rural planning areas. Statewide and interstate projects are grouped separately. County Groups the projects by county. Identifies the project mode in the following order: Mode Highways, Bridges, Airport, Transit, Rail The State Route (SR) shows the route on which the project is located. Route Local roads are coded 9900 or 9911. A brief name given to the project, often referred to as the project’s “short title” or Title/Sponsor the Transit Entity sponsoring the project. The municipality where the project is located may be included. Denotes the time period in which the project is to be implemented: 1 - First Four Years – October 2016 – September 2020 Period 2 - Second Four Years – October 2020 – September 2024 3 - Third Four Years – October 2024 – September 2028 Depicts the costs in thousands of dollars associated with the following phases/items: Study - projects that are studies or research projects PE - preliminary engineering of the project development FD - final design
    [Show full text]
  • Instream Flow Studies Pennsylvania and Maryland
    INSTREAM FLOW STUDIES PENNSYLVANIA AND MARYLAND Publication 191 May 1998 Thomas L. Denslinger Donald R. Jackson Civil Engineer Manager–Hydraulic Staff Hydrologist Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection Susquehanna River Basin Commission William A. Gast George J. Lazorchick Chief, Div. Of Water Planning and Allocation Hydraulic Engineer Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection Susquehanna River Basin Commission John J. Hauenstein John E. McSparran Engineering Technician Chief, Water Management Susquehanna River Basin Commission Susquehanna River Basin Commission David W. Heicher Travis W. Stoe Chief, Water Quality & Monitoring Program Biologist Susquehanna River Basin Commission Susquehanna River Basin Commission Jim Henriksen Leroy M. Young Ecologist, Biological Resources Division Fisheries Biologist U.S. Geological Survey Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission Prepared in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection under Contract ME94002. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION Paul O. Swartz, Executive Director John Hicks, N.Y. Commissioner Scott Foti, N.Y. Alternate James M. Seif, Pa. Commissioner Dr. Hugh V. Archer, Pa. Alternate Jane Nishida, Md. Commissioner J.L. Hearn, Md. Alternate Vacant, U.S. Commissioner Vacant, U.S. Alternate The Susquehanna River Basin Commission was created as an independent agency by a federal-interstate compact* among the states of Maryland, New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the federal government. In creating the Commission, the Congress and state legislatures formally recognized the water resources of the Susquehanna River Basin as a regional asset vested with local, state, and national interests for which all the parties share responsibility. As the single federal-interstate water resources agency with basinwide authority, the Commission's goal is to effect coordinated planning, conservation, management, utilization, development and control of basin water resources among the government and private sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • April 1, 2017 (Pages 1843-1990)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 47 (2017) Repository 4-1-2017 April 1, 2017 (Pages 1843-1990) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2017 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "April 1, 2017 (Pages 1843-1990)" (2017). Volume 47 (2017). 13. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2017/13 This April is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 47 (2017) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 47 Number 13 Saturday, April 1, 2017 • Harrisburg, PA Pages 1843—1990 See Part II Page 1955 for the Subject Index for Part I January—March 2017 Agencies in this issue The Courts Delaware River Basin Commission Department of Agriculture Department of Banking and Securities Department of Environmental Protection Department of Health Department of Human Services Department of Labor and Industry Environmental Hearing Board Executive Board Insurance Department Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Philadelphia Parking Authority Philadelphia Regional Port Authority State Board of Nursing Susquehanna River Basin Commission Detailed list of contents appears inside. Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): Pennsylvania Bulletin Pennsylvania No. 509, April 2017 TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY Attn:
    [Show full text]