DOCSLIB.ORG

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon September 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon September 2020 TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON AGENCY SAFETY PLAN (ASP) PORTLAND, OREGON SEPTEMBER 2020 Agency Safety Plan September 2020 Date of initial publication Record of Revisions Publish Version Page(s) Description of revision Approved date number affected/Persons by 8/31/20 001 Agency SSE Agency Safety Plan submittal for review and approval by TriMet’s accountable executive and leadership Review and submission to the TriMet board of directors Agency Safety Plan submittal to ODOT for review and approval Receipt of Agency Safety Plan approval from ODOT Approved ASP submission by TriMet to FTA ii Agency Safety Plan September 2020 ACRONYMS ...........................................................................................................................................................................V DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................................................................................VI FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 TRIMET MISSION AND VISION................................................................................................................................................. 3 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF ASP ............................................................................................................................................. 3 ASP Development ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 ASP Reviews and Updates ........................................................................................................................................... 5 ASP Distribution ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 STATE SAFETY OVERSIGHT AUTHORITY ..................................................................................................................................... 7 SSO Program Standard Requirements........................................................................................................................ 7 FTA Requirements........................................................................................................................................................ 7 SMS COMPONENT I – SAFETY POLICY ................................................................................................................................ 8 1.1. POLICY STATEMENT.................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2. EXECUTIVE SIGNATURES..........................................................................................................................................10 1.3. TRIMET PERFORMANCE TARGETS ............................................................................................................................11 1.4. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE .................................................................................................................................11 1.4.1. Organizational Charts .............................................................................................................................11 1.4.2. Duties and Responsibilities of Key Leaders ............................................................................................14 1.4.3. Safety Accountabilities and Responsibilities Matrix .............................................................................16 1.5. SAFETY POLICIES ....................................................................................................................................................18 1.6. TRIMET SAFETY AND SECURITY RELATED COMMITTEES...............................................................................................18 1.6.1. Transit Change Review Committee (TCRC) ............................................................................................18 1.6.2. Fire/Life Safety and Security Committee ...............................................................................................18 1.6.3. Workplace Safety Committee.................................................................................................................19 1.6.4. Safety and Security Committee ..............................................................................................................19 1.6.5. Rail Operations Review Committee........................................................................................................19 1.6.6. Vehicle Accident Review and Appeals Board.........................................................................................20 SMS COMPONENT II – SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................21 2 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION ...................................................................................................................................................21 2.1.1. Hazard Tracking ......................................................................................................................................23 2.2. SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT.......................................................................................................................................25 2.2.1. Hazard Categorization ............................................................................................................................25 2.2.2. Risk Tolerability Decision Making Process .............................................................................................25 2.2.3. Hazard Risk Index ....................................................................................................................................25 2.2.4. Risk Tolerability Non-Consensus Procedures .........................................................................................27 2.3. SAFETY RISK MITIGATION .......................................................................................................................................28 2.3.1. Procedures to Reduce Risk Levels...........................................................................................................28 2.3.2. Evaluation of Current Mitigations..........................................................................................................29 2.3.3. Risk Mitigation Implementation and Tracking......................................................................................30 2.3.4. Safety Risk Mitigation Ownership ..........................................................................................................31 2.4. SAFETY DATA ACQUISITION AND ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................31 2.4.1. Data Acquisition Process.........................................................................................................................31 2.4.2. Data Reporting to Safety Function.........................................................................................................31 2.5. COORDINATION WITH REGULATORY AUTHORITIES ......................................................................................................32 2.5.1. Data Reporting to Safety Function.........................................................................................................31 iii Agency Safety Plan September 2020 SMS COMPONENT III – SAFETY ASSURANCE ...................................................................................................................35 3. SAFETY ASSURANCE PROCESS............................................................................................................................................35 3.1. SAFETY PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT ........................................................................................36 3.1.1. Internal Safety Review Program.............................................................................................................36 3.2. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANS AND PROCESS ................................................................................................................37 3.2.1. Reporting and Coordination with ODOT................................................................................................37 3.3. CHANGE MANAGEMENT .........................................................................................................................................37 3.3.1. Configuration Management ...................................................................................................................38 3.4. SYSTEM SAFETY CERTIFICATION ...............................................................................................................................41 3.4.1. Certification Process................................................................................................................................42
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Final2018 RTP Projectsweb20190315
    Published 3/15/19 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Strategic List of Additional Priority Projects and Programs RTP Investment County Nominating Agency Primary Facility Owner RTP ID Project Name Start Location End Location Description Estimated Cost (2016 Time Period Financially Category dollars) Constrained project list Active Transportation Clackamas County Oregon City Oregon City 10147 Newell Creek Canyon/Holly Hwy 213 and Redland Maple Lane Road Add a shared-use path along the west side of $ 5,000,000 2028-2040 No Lane Shared-Use Path Road the gully between the Redland/Livesay and Holly/Donovan intersection and then along Holly Lane between Donovan and Maple Lane. Will require a bridge over the gully south of Redland Road (TSP Project S12, S13). The project or a portion of the project is outside the designated urban growth boundary. Active Transportation Clackamas County Oregon City Oregon City 10150 Barlow Road Shared-Use Trail Abernethy Road UGB Add a shared-use path on the west/south side $ 4,600,000 2028-2040 No of Redland Road, along the north side of the gully from the Redland/Livesay to Holcomb/Oak Tree intersection, and from Holcomb to Ames Street. Install enhanced crossings at Redland Road and Holcomb Blvd (TSP S6, S9, S10, S11, C5, C7). Active Transportation Clackamas County Lake Oswego Lake Oswego 11171 Tryon Creek Ped Bridge Foothills Park Tryon Cove Park 500' long, 10' wide asphalt pathway completes a $ 3,000,000 2028-2040 No (@Tryon Cove Park) connection at the existing north end Foothills pathway with to Tryon Cove Park with a pedestrian bridge (per Foothills District Plan).
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Session Line 1 Title of Session Line 2
    Planning and Execution of a Major Light Rail Transit Tunnel Inspection Matt Baccitich Project Coordinator TriMet – MOW Operations Portland, OR Matt Harlan, PE Project Manager David Evans and Associates, Inc. Portland, OR Planning and Execution of a Major Light Rail Transit Tunnel Inspection • Robertson Tunnel Overview and Construction • Inspection Planning and Scoping • Owner Planning and Coordination • Inspection Results and Deliverables TriMet System Overview Robertson Tunnel Fast Facts Construction Details -TBM - Cut and Cover -Blasting Washington Park Station Inspection Planning and Scoping • Work backwards from project need • Establish deliverable expectations Inspection Planning and Scoping Inspection Planning and Scoping • Work backwards from project need • Establish deliverable expectations • Scale inspection effort Inspection Planning and Scoping 10001 - Cast-in-Place Tunnel Liner (SF) Drip Begin End Efflorescence/Rust Pans Delam/Spall/Patch Exposed Rebar Cracking (Liners) Distortion Leakage Station Station Staining (Qty) CS2 CS3 CS4 CS2 CS3 CS4 CS2 CS3 CS4 CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4 CS2 CS3 CS4 CS2 CS3 CS4 782+00 782+50 0 0 0 0 0 0 260 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 782+50 783+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 783+00 783+50 0 0 0 0 0 0 440 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 210 0 783+50 784+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 550 0 0 270 50 0 0 0 0 0 20 250 0 784+00 784+50 1 0 0 0 0 0 370 20 0 260 60 50 0 0 0 0 110 250 0 784+50 785+00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 330 0 0 200 100 50 0 0 0 0 70 340 0 785+00 785+50 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 305 5 0 200 50 100 0 0 0 0 210 250 0 785+50 786+00 0
    [Show full text]
  • Amberglen Community Plan
    Create a vibrant regional activity center enlivened with high-quality pedestrian and environmental amenities, taking advantage of the region’s light rail system. AmberGlen Community Plan CITY OF HILLSBORO, OREGON Adopted by Ordinance No. 5933, January 19, 2010 AmberGlen Community Plan Adopted by Ordinance No. 5933, January 19, 2010 Prepared by the City of Hillsboro with Cardno WRG David Evans and Associates, Inc. Johnson Reid Land Use Economics 2007 OHSU/AmberGlen Concept Plan Prepared for the City of Hillsboro by PB PlaceMaking Leland Consulting Group Kittelson & Associates, Inc. SWCA Environmental Consultants Cover Illustration Credit: Sabrina Henkhaus, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose..........................................................................................................................2 Plan Organization .........................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 4 Context...........................................................................................................................4 Planning Process ..........................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • STAFF REPORT To: Daniel L. Dias, Economic and Community Development Director From: Gregg Snyder, Transportation Planning Superv
    STAFF REPORT To: Daniel L. Dias, Economic and Community Development Director From: Gregg Snyder, Transportation Planning Supervisor Don Odermott, Transportation Planning Engineer Date: April 16, 2019 Subject: Letters of Support and Required Mitigation for TriMet’s Red Line Extension and Operational Improvements Project Requested City Council Action: Consider Transportation Committee’s recommendation to City Council to authorize the Mayor to execute two letters to TriMet regarding the Red Line Extension and Operational Improvements Project; one which confers full support of the project and one which requires mitigation of the Red Line Project’s significant impact to multi-modal mobility and safety at the 185th Avenue at-grade crossing. Background/Project Overview: TriMet is currently planning to extend the MAX Red Line from its current terminus at the Beaverton Transit Center out to the Fairplex Station in Hillsboro. According to the analysis completed to date, staff have concerns that the at-grade railroad crossing at 185th Avenue will be significantly affected by the increase in light rail train frequencies. Current traffic analysis is showing an unmitigated double digit increase in vehicle, bus and pedestrian delays and queues in the corridor. At the February 2019 Transportation Committee meeting staff presented the findings of the traffic analysis and discussed next steps which included sending two letters to TriMet. The first letter would confer full support of the project and the second would require mitigation of the Red Line’s significant impact to multi-modal mobility at the grade crossing. Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 are the proposed letters that the Transportation Committee is recommending be executed by the Mayor and delivered to TriMet.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Alerts – Digital Displays
    Service Alerts – Digital Displays TriMet has digital displays at most MAX Light Rail stations to provide real-time arrival information as well as service disruption/delay messaging. Some of the displays are flat screens as shown to the right. Others are reader boards. Due to space, the messages need to be as condensed as possible. While we regularly post the same alert at stations along a line, during the Rose Quarter MAX Improvements we provided more specific alerts by geographical locations and even individual stations. This was because the service plan, while best for the majority of riders, was complex and posed communications challenges. MAX Blue Line only displays MAX Blue Line disrupted and frequency reduced. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/Rose Quarter and Lloyd Center stations. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 1 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town MAX Blue/Red lines disrupted and frequency reduced. Red Line detoured. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 2 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town Direct shuttle buses running between Kenton/N Denver Station, being served by Red Line, and PDX. trimet.org/rq MAC Red and Yellow displays – N Albina to Expo Center Red, Yellow lines serving stations btwn Interstate/RQ and Expo Center. trimet.org/rq. Connect with PDX shuttle buses at Kenton. MAX Red display – Parkrose Red Line disrupted, this segment running btwn Gateway and PDX. Use Blue/Green btwn Lloyd Center and Gateway, shuttles btwn Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Trimet SE Service Enhancement Plan
    Presentation to the Clackamas County Board of County Commissioners September 22, 2015 Schedule Westside: Completed in 2014 Southwest: Completed in 2015 Eastside: Completion in 2016 Southeast: Completion in 2016 North/Central: Completion in 2016 Annual Service Plan Optimize & Maintain Restore Increase Capacity & Restore Frequent Increase spans & Reliability Service Levels frequencies Schedule & detail Add new lines tweaks Optimize routes & schedules Reconfigure lines Hillsboro Beaverton Gresham Portland Forest Grove/ Cornelius Tigard Happy Milwaukie King Valley City Lake Oswego Tualatin Legend Sherwood West Job center Linn Oregon City Downtown trips Hillsboro Beaverton Gresham Portland Forest Grove/ Cornelius Tigard Happy Milwaukie King Valley City Lake Oswego Tualatin Legend Sherwood West Job center Linn Oregon City Downtown trips Hillsboro Beaverton Gresham Portland Forest Grove/ Cornelius Tigard Happy Milwaukie King Valley City Lake Oswego Legend Tualatin Sherwood West Job center Linn Oregon City Downtown trips Outreach efforts: More service to Sunnyside Rd. Clackamas Industrial Area OC to Tualatin service Service to S. Oregon City trimet.org/southeast SOUTHEAST Help make transit better in your community Making Transit Better in Southeast Draft Vision We’ve been talking with riders What we heard from the community and community members We learned from Southeast riders and residents about the about improving bus service in challenges they face today and how the region will grow in the future. Based on this, we’re proposing more and better Southeast Portland, Estacada, bus service to help people get to jobs, education, health Gladstone, Happy Valley, care, affordable housing and essential services. Proposed Milwaukie, Oregon City and bus service improvements include route changes and extensions, new bus lines, adjusted frequency and better Clackamas County.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F-1: Westside Service Enhancement Plan
    Appendix F-1: Westside Service Enhancement Plan The following pages are an excerpt from the Westside Service Enhancement Plan showing the direct reference to the Red Line Extension. The full plan is available at https://trimet.org/future/pdf/westside-report.pdf. • Merlo to Progress Ridge/Tigard Extension of service south of the Merlo Rd/158th Ave MAX station connecting with South Beaverton, the Progress Ridge Townsquare, and the Tigard Transit Center. • Willow Creek to the North Hillsboro Industrial Area Extension of service to Cornell Rd., Orenco, Intel Ronler Acres, and the North Hillsboro Industrial Area via Shute Rd. and Brookwood Parkway. Downtown Portland to Progress Ridge Opportunities for action • Extension of peak period express service from Realign bus routes to strengthen a more complete downtown Portland to Progress Ridge north-south and east-west grid, extend MAX Red Townsquare. Line service to Hillsboro and provide frequent or • Downtown Hillsboro to Downtown Beaverton express services on key north- south corridors. New bus line running between Hatfield Complete the grid of bus lines Government Center and Beaverton Transit Extend or change eight bus routes so they better Center via Baseline Rd. and Jenkins Rd. connect with areas of current development and connecting downtown Hillsboro, Willow Creek future growth–residential and employment—and Transit Center, Nike, Cedar Hills Crossing and with MAX and Frequent Service Lines, especially Beaverton Transit Center. going north-south. Improvements include: • North Hillsboro to South Hillsboro Realigned bus service running from Intel Jones Farm to the future South Hillsboro via Brookwood Ave. and TV Highway and connect- ing with MAX at the Fair Complex/Hillsboro Airport Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Trimet Film/Photo Guidelines
    TriMet Film/Photo Guidelines Overview TriMet’s core business mission is to provide mass transit services safely throughout the Portland metro area. TriMet vehicles and property are for the exclusive use of TriMet, its employees and customers. TriMet allows filming/photography on TriMet property that is open to the public, as well as bus, commuter rail and light rail systems in accordance with this protocol. Any permission granted to film/photograph under this protocol is subordinate to, and will be based on, TriMet’s determination of the impact to TriMet’s core mission, safety, and its obligations to its customers, employees and to the general public. Safety and security are TriMet’s top priorities when approving these requests. All persons filming/photographing on TriMet property are subject to, and must comply with, TriMet Code of Conduct regulations, and all other applicable laws, rules and regulations. Persons filming/photographing on TriMet property must fully and immediately comply with requests/direction from authorized TriMet personnel related to safety concerns. Permit Required: TriMet requires those who wish to film/photograph on TriMet property or on board vehicles for commercial, educational or nonprofit purposes to have a permit. TriMet’s Communications Department processes permit applications and issues permits. TriMet has no requirement to approve a request or enter into a permit with a requestor. TriMet must receive a signed permit and acceptable insurance certificates prior to an approved shoot. Permit Not Required: Non-commercial, personal use filming/photography by the general public that does not interfere with transit operations and safety, including boarding/exiting of passengers, and that can be accomplished by one person using a hand-held camera without ancillary equipment such as a tripod, microphone, reflectors, special lighting, cables or other wiring, is not subject to the permit requirements of this protocol.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Transportation Plan for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities I Table of Contents June 2020
    Table of Contents June 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 Development of the CTP .......................................................................................................... 1-3 Principles of the CTP ................................................................................................................ 1-5 Overview of relevant grant programs ..................................................................................... 1-7 TriMet Role as the Special Transportation Fund Agency ........................................................ 1-8 Other State Funding ................................................................................................................. 1-9 Coordination with Metro and Joint Policy Advisory Committee (JPACT) .............................. 1-11 2. Existing Transportation Services ...................................................................... 2-1 Regional Transit Service Providers .......................................................................................... 2-6 Community-Based Transit Providers ..................................................................................... 2-18 Statewide Transit Providers ................................................................................................... 2-26 3. Service Guidelines ........................................................................................... 3-1 History .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail Project Profile, Oregon
    Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail Project Portland, Oregon (January 2015) The Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) is constructing a double-track light rail transit (LRT) extension of the existing Yellow Line from the downtown Portland transit mall across the Willamette River, to southeast Portland, the city of Milwaukie, and urbanized areas of Clackamas County. The project includes construction of a new multimodal bridge across the Willamette River, one surface park-and­ ride lot facility with 320 spaces, one park-and-ride garage with 355 spaces, expansion of an existing maintenance facility, bike and pedestrian improvements and the acquisition of 18 light rail vehicles. Service will operate at 10-minute peak period frequencies during peak periods on weekdays. The project is expected to serve 22,800 average weekday trips in 2030. The project will increase transit access to and from employment and activity centers along the Portland and Milwaukie transportation corridor. It will link Downtown Portland with educational institutions, dense urban neighborhoods, and emerging growth areas in East Portland and Milwaukie. The Willamette River separates most of the corridor from Downtown Portland and the South Waterfront. The corridor’s only north-south highway (Highway 99E), which provides access to Downtown Portland via the existing Ross Island, Hawthorne, Morrison, and Burnside bridges, is limited to two through-lanes in each direction for much of the segment between Milwaukie and central Portland, most of which is congested. Existing buses have slow operating speeds due to congestion, narrow clearances and frequent bridge lift span openings. None of the existing river crossings provide easy access to key markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Metro Council
    BEFORE THE METRO COUNCIL FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVISING THE 2011 ) RESOLUTION NO. 12-4340 LAND USE FINAL ORDER FOR THE EXPO ) CENTER/HAYDEN ISLAND SEGMENT OF THE ) Introduced by Councilor Rex Burkholder SOUTH/NORTH LIGHT RAIL PROJECT ON ) REMAND FROM LUBA AND THE OREGON ) SUPREME COURT ) WHEREAS, the Oregon Legislature enacted Oregon Laws 1996, Chapter 12 (the Act), establishing procedures for developing the South/North MAX Light Rail Project through adoption by the Metro Council of a Land Use Final Order (LUFO); and WHEREAS, on August 11, 2011, the Metro Council adopted a Land Use Final Order (LUFO) for the segment of the South/North MAX Light Rail Project extending northward from the Expo Center and the Interstate 5/Victory Boulevard Interchange to the Oregon/Washington state line; and WHEREAS, among other things, the 2011 LUFO approved new two-tier northbound and southbound Interstate-5 Columbia River bridges - with highway on the upper decks, light rail on the lower deck of the southbound bridge, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities on the lower deck of the northbound bridge - a portion of which extend from Hayden Island to the Oregon- Washington state line; and WHEREAS, in Weber Coastal Bells Limited Partners v. Metro, LUBA 2011-80 to 2011- 83 (October 26, 2011), affirmed by the Oregon Supreme Court (SC S059872, February 16, 2012), LUBA upheld the 2011 LUFO on all issues except one: LUBA and the Court remanded the LUFO to Metro, ruling that the Council exceeded its authority under the Act by approving light rail facilities and associated
    [Show full text]