DOCSLIB.ORG

Five-Year Review of the Beverly and Kaminuriak Caribou Protection Measures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Five-Year Review of the Beverly and Kaminuriak Caribou Protection Measures FIVE-YEAR REVIEW OF THE BEVERLY AND KAMINURIAK CARIBOU PROTECTION MEASURES L. MYCHASIW N.W.T. WILDLIFE SERVICE YELLOWKNIFE, N.W.T. 1984 0 Northwest Territories Renewable Resources File Report No. 42 iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 1978 the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (DIAND) introduced special operating conditions for land use permits on traditional ranges of the Beverly and Kaminuriak herds of barren-ground caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus). These Caribou Protection Measures were designed to prevent potentially harmful contact between caribou and land use activities in areas designated as calving grounds and post-calving areas, at designated water crossings, and along migration routes to calving grounds. Special operating conditions were applied in relation to protected areas during prescribed times in each of the 5 years that Caribou Protection Measures were in place. In the first year land use permits for areas inside Caribou Protection Areas were withheld from 15 May to 31 July, but in the following year a land use permit holder was eligible to have his permit area released from controls if monitoring showed that caribou cows and calves were not in the area. The monitoring program was carried out by the Northwest Territories ( N. W. T.) Wildlife Service. The caribou monitor conducted extensive surveys of both the Kaminuriak and Beverly caribou ranges in 1978 and 1979, but from 1980 to 1982 only land use sites were monitored to verify whether or not caribou were in the area. Data from studies carried out by the N.W.T. Wildlife Service were combined with monitoring results to evaluate protection area boundaries, the timing of controls, and designated water crossings. We found that for the 5 years from 1978 - 19 83 the iv Beverly caribou used the northernmost part of the Beverly Caribou Protection Area during peaks of calving. During the same period, Kaminuriak caribou used the west-central part of the Kaminuriak Caribou Protection Area. Movement of female caribou and calves from calving grounds did not follow a definite pattern and discrete post-calving areas could not be identified. Water crossings were ranked according to frequency of use criteria. The N.W.T. Wildlife Service conducted studies with respect to caribou behaviour, water crossings and bio-physical charac teris­ tics of calving grounds. Baseline data on the ecology and behaviour of caribou were collected during the 3 year research program and, in the final year, disturbances were staged to observe caribou behaviour in respons.e to helicopter disturbance under controlled conditions. Recommendations are given with respect to timing of protection measures, designated protection areas, monitoring, and general aspects of the Caribou Protection Measures. v TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................ iii LIST OF FIGURES .............................................. vii LIST OF TABLES ............................................... ix INTRODUCTION ................................................. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CARIBOU MONITORING AND PROTECTION 2 COMPLEMENTARY CARIBOU SURVEYS ................................ 5 TIME AND SPACE RELATIONSHIPS ................................. 6 EVOLUTION OF CARIBOU PROTECTION MEASURES 10 REVIEW OF MONITORING INFORMATION ON SEASONAL PATTERNS OF RANGE USE ••••••••••••• 16 Spring Migration 16 Beverly Herd ••..••. 16 Kaminuriak Herd 16 Calving Grounds 17 Beverly Herd 17 Kaminuriak Herd 26 Timing of Calving 27 Post-calving 27 Designation of Post-calving Areas 27 Beverly Herd 29 Kaminuriak Herd 29 Water Crossings 32 Efficacy of Caribou Protection Measures 35 Deferral of Land Use Operations 37 Rescheduling of Land Use Operations and Voluntary Suspension of Activities •.•••.••••••••••• 38 Aircraft Operations .....••••••••.•••••••••.•.••.. ·39 Obstructing Water Crossings and Interfering with Migration ............................................. 40 RESEARCH PROGRAM ....................... 41 Research and Monitoring Reports 44 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................... 45 Timing of Caribou Protection Measures 45 Caribou Protection Areas 46 Beverly Herd •.••••••• 47 Kaminuriak Herd 47 Monitoring Program 50 Water Crossings 55 Caribou Management Board 56 Aircraft and Other Activities Not Under Land Use Control ............................................... 57 vi SUMMARY DISCUSSION ON RECOMMENDATIONS •.....•...•.••.•.••••... 58 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................. 60 LITERATURE CITED ............................................. 61 APPENDIX A. Caribou Protection Measures, 1982 •.••••••••••.• 64 APPENDIX B. Territorial Land Use Regulations •.••••••.•••... 67 APPENDIX c. Order-in-council PC 1977-1153 83 APPENDIX D. Federal Court Order T-1628-78 87 APPENDIX E. Territorial Lands Act •..•...••.•.•.•..•••••..•. 98 APPENDIX F. Caribou Protection Measures, 1978 .............. 109 APPENDIX G. Caribou Protection Measures, 1979 .............. 111 APPENDIX H. Caribou Protection Measures, 19 80 .............. 114 APPENDIX I. Transport Canada Information Circular 0/1/78 117 APPENDIX J. Boundary Realignments for Water Crossings 3 ' 4 ' 5 ' 1 2 ' 1 3 ' 1 4 ' 17 ' 1 8 ' 2 1 ' 2 2 ' 23 ' and 2 4 . 1 2 0 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Caribou Protection Areas in 1980, 1981, 1982 and the Baker Lake area defined by Order-in- Council 1977-1153 ........................ ......... 4 Figure 2. Caribou Protection Area map for 1978 .•....•.•••... 7 Figure 3. Caribou Protection Areas for 1979 and designated water crossings • .• • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • • 8 Figure 4. Beverly and Kaminuriak spring migration routes from 1978 to 1982 .•.••••••••••••.•••••••••• 19 Figure 5. Beverly calving grounds for 4 years from 1957 to 1960 and Kaminuriak calving grounds for 5 years from 1972 to 1977 ••.••••••.•...•••..•••••••• 21 Figure 6. Beverly calving grounds for 3 years from 1962 to 1974 and Kaminuriak calving grounds for 5 years from 1963 to 1971 .••••.••••••••••...•.•••••• 23 Figure 7. Beverly and Kaminuriak calving grounds from 1978 to 1982 • • . • . • . • . • . • . • . • . 25 Figure 8. Beverly and Kaminuriak post-calving movements from 1978 to 1982 • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • . • . • • . • • . • • • . • • • . • 31 Figure 9. Designated water crossings of Beverly and Kaminuriak herds ••••••.•...••••••••..••.•...••.•.. 34 Figure 10. Proposed new boundaries for Caribou Protection Measures • . • . • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • . • . • . • • • • • 48 ix LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Calving intervals or peak-calving on Beverly and Kaminuriak calving grounds ••••••••.•..•..••••• 28 Table 2. Locations of designated water crossings and dates when sites were described •.•.••••..•.•••••.• 33 Table 3. Documented use of designated water crossings in 1978, 1979 and 1980 •..•••••...•.•••...•....•... 36 Table 4. Land use operations deferred by DIAND in response to recommendations of the caribou monitor . 39 Table 5. Aerial monitoring of caribou from 1978 to 1 9 82 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 51 1 INTRODUCTION The Caribou Protection Measures were implemented by the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (DIAND) in 1978 to impose controls with respect to land use operations in places where, and at times when, barren-ground caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) of the Beverly and Kaminuriak herds were believed most sensitive to disturbance. The main thrust of the measures is to prevent potentially harmful contact between land use activities and caribou. Contact is minimized by deferring land use operations that could interfere with caribou at prescribed times on their calving grounds, during post-calving movements and at designated water crossings. The approach taken is consistent with the general principle advanced by Cowan (1971) whereby optimum utilization of a habitat and optimum production from a population can only be realized in a known and predictable social and physical environment. Introduction of a wide variety of surprises may induce avoidance behaviour and excitability that lead to greater energy demands and inefficient use of habitat. This review considers DIAND' s deferral system and the work carried out by the Northwest Territories (N.W.T.) Wildlife Service during the 5 year term of the protection measures. DIAND funded four distinct but interrelated programs carried out by the N.W.T. Wildlife Service: 1) monitoring caribou movements and distribution 2) disturbance studies on calving grounds 3) water crossing studies 4) characteristics of calving grounds. 2 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CARIBOU MONITORING AND PROTECTION Darby (1978) cited six main objectives for the monitoring program: 1) to monitor and map the movements and activities of the Beverly and Kaminur iak caribou herds during spring migration, the calving period ( 15 May - 30 June) and post-calving period (1 July - 31 July); 2) to determine caribou usage of water crossing sites, make a special study of the Kazan River crossing, and develop specific criteria for identification of "critical" water crossing sites; 3) to evaluate protection area boundaries of calving and post-calving in relation to actual positions of animals and identify specific habitats of importance within these areas; 4) to note and map human activities near caribou and advise Land Use Inspectors of any anticipated problems; 5) to make observations on the behavioural response of caribou to human activities, including activities related to mining exploration
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statutory Report on Wildlife to the Nunavut Legislative Assembly Section 176 of the Wildlife Act
    Statutory Report on Wildlife to the Nunavut Legislative Assembly Section 176 of the Wildlife Act 1.0 Review of Wildlife and Habitat Management Programs for Terrestrial Species in Nunavut…………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Wildlife Act and Wildlife Regulations………………………………………………..2 1.2 Qikiqtaaluk Region……………………………………………………………………2 1.2.1 Qikiqtaaluk Research Initiatives…………………………………………………….2 a. Peary caribou………………………………………………………………………….2 b. High Arctic muskox…………………………………………………………………...3 c. North Baffin caribou…………………………………………………………………..4 1.2.2 Qikiqtaaluk Management Initiatives………………………………………………...5 a. Peary Caribou Management Plan……………………………………………………...5 b. High Arctic Muskox…………………………………………………………………..5 c. South Baffin Management Plan……………………………………………………….6 1.3 Kitikmeot Region……………………………………………………………………...8 1.3.1 Kitikmeot Research Initiatives………………………………………………………9 a. Wolverine and Grizzly bear Hair Snagging………………………………………….. 9 b. Mainland Caribou Projects……………………………………………………………9 c. Boothia Caribou Project……………………………………………………………...10 d. Dolphin and Union Caribou Project……………………............................................10 e. Mainland and Boothia Peninsula Muskoxen………………………………………...11 f. Harvest and Ecological Research Operational System (HEROS)…………………...12 g. Vegetation Mapping……………………………………………………………….....12 1.3.2 Kitikmeot Management Initiatives…………………………………………………12 a. Grizzly Bear Management…………………………………………………………...12 b. Bluenose East Management Plan…………………………………………………….12 c. DU Caribou Management Plan………………………………………………………13 d. Muskox Status
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Data Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2262
    Scientific Excellence • Resource Protection & Conservation • Benefits for Canadians Excellence scientifique • Protection et conservation des ressources • Bénéfices aux Canadiens DFO Lib ary MPO B bhotheque Ill 11 11 11 12022686 11 A Review of the Status and Harvests of Fish, Invertebrate, and Marine Mammal Stocks in the Nunavut Settlement Area D.B. Stewart Central and Arctic Region Department of Fisheries and Oceans Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N6 1994 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2262 . 51( P_ .3 AS-5 -- I__2,7 Fisheries Pêches 1+1 1+1and Oceans et Océans CanaclUi ILIIM Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Manuscript reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which deals with national or regional problems. Distribu- tion is restricted to institutions or individuals located in particular regions of Canada. However, no restriction is placed on subject matter, and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Manuscript reports may be cited as full-publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts and,indexed in the Department's annual index to scientific and technical publications. Numbers 1-900 in this series were issued as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Biological Board of Canada, and subsequent to 1937 when the name of the Board was changed by Act of Parliament, as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 901-1425 were issued as Manuscript Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuktu and Nogak Project: a Caribou Chronicle Final Report
    Re: Tuktu and Nogak Project: A Caribou Chronicle STUDY DIRECTOR RELEASE FORM The above publication is the result of a project conducted under the West Kitikmeot / Slave Study. I have reviewed the report and advise that it has fulfilled the requirements of the approved proposal and can be subjected to independent expert review and be considered for release to the public. Study Director Date INDEPENDENT EXPERT REVIEW FORM I have reviewed this publication for scientific content and scientific practices and find the report is acceptable given the specific purposes of this project and subject to the field conditions encountered. Reviewer Date INDEPENDENT EXPERT REVIEW FORM I have reviewed this publication for scientific content and scientific practices and find the report is acceptable given the specific purposes of this project and subject to the field conditions encountered. Reviewer Date BOARD RELEASE FORM The Study Board is satisfied that this final report has been reviewed for scientific content and approves it for release to the public. Chair West Kitikmeot/Slave Society Date Box 2572, Yellowknife, NT, X1A 2P9 Ph (867) 669-6235 Fax (867) 920-4346 e-mail: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.wkss.nt.ca The Tuktu and Nogak Project Final Report: A Caribou Chronicle Copyright for this report is held by the Qitirmiut Elders and the Tuktu and Nogak Project, 2001 All photos are Natasha Thorpe unless otherwise indicated. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise (except brief passages for purposes of review) without the prior permission of the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to The
    SUBMISSION TO THE NUNAVUT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR Information: X Decision: Issue: The Kivalliq Ecological Land Classification Project Map Atlas Background: The Kivalliq Habitat Mapping project began as a pilot study in July/August 2000. Its success let to expansion to cover the entire Kivalliq Region. In August 2000, approximately 200 plant communities in the Banks Lake study area were visited and plant type and percent cover recorded. During August 2001 160 sites were visited and plants and their percent cover values recorded in the Tehak Lake area. In August 2002 240 plant communities were examined in the Beverly lake area and 65 sites in the Lyon Inlet area, again in August 2003 240 sites in the Lyon Inlet area were sampled, in 2004 600 sites were sampled in the Baker Lake, Rankin Inlet and Snowbank River areas, while in 2005 450 plant communities were sampled in the Princess Mary Lake and Brown Lake areas. The 2006 growing season was our largest to date having investigated 550 sites in the Henik, Edehon, Nulitin, Maguse and Hicks Lake areas south to the Manitoba border. Finally, in August 2007, 483 sites were sampled in the Tulemalu Lake and Lorillard River areas (Figure 1 and 2). These sites represent over 90% of the entire Kivalliq Region 1 Figure 1 Landsat scenes sampled and mapped for the Kivalliq vegetation mapping program. 2 Figure 2 Mapping extents and sample sites for the Kivalliq vegetation mapping program. 3 Current Status The goals and objectives of this study were to create a database that includes vegetation type as its foundation but also includes; wildlife location data, hydrological records, weather records, geology, and topography, hunter observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Chasse Et Exploitation Minière Au Nunavut : Une Expérience Inuit Du Territoire À Qamani’Tuaq (Baker Lake)
    Chasse et exploitation minière au Nunavut : une expérience inuit du territoire à Qamani’tuaq (Baker Lake) Mémoire Pascale Laneuville Maîtrise en anthropologie Maître ès Arts (M.A.) Québec, Canada © Pascale Laneuville, 2013 ii Résumé L‘objectif de cette recherche est d‘évaluer l‘impact de la mine d‘or de Meadowbank sur la relation entre la communauté inuit de Qamani‘tuaq, au Nunavut, et son territoire. Ce dernier est défini comme un espace socialement et historiquement construit et dont le sens émerge de l‘expérience quotidienne et de la mémoire collective. Mon étude démontre une multitude d‘impacts socioéconomiques, positifs comme négatifs, découlant notamment des nouveaux emplois et des répercussions sur le caribou. La construction d‘une route privée et l‘imposition d‘une régulation quant à son utilisation impliquent par ailleurs une contradiction entre deux formes de territorialité. Cependant, le rapport au territoire, propre aux Inuit, demeure manifeste. Une majorité d‘Inuit démontre en effet la capacité à tirer avantage du nouveau contexte dans le but de supporter leurs activités sur le territoire. Aussi, les expériences particulières des travailleurs au camp minier témoignent du lien étroit entre le lieu, la communauté et son histoire. iii Abstract The goal of this research is to evaluate the effects of the Meadowbank goldmine on the relationship occurring between the Inuit community of Qamani‘tuaq, in Nunavut, and its territory. Territory is the social and historical construction of a space which derives meaning through the everyday experience and the collective memory. The results show the existence of various socioeconomic impacts, both positive and negative, resulting among others from new jobs and from impact on caribou.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Mapping in the Kivalliq Using Digital Landsat Tm 5/7 Data
    VEGETATION MAPPING IN THE KIVALLIQ USING DIGITAL LANDSAT TM 5/7 DATA Mitch Campbell1 1Regional Wildlife Biologist, Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, P.O. Box 120, Arviat, NU X0C 0E0 2006 Interim Wildlife Report, No. 7 Campbell, M. 2006. Vegetation mapping in the Kivalliq using digital LANDSAT TM 5/7 data. Government of Nunavut, Department of Environment, Interim Wildlife Report: 7, Iqaluit, 21 pp. INTERIM REPORT TO THE NUNAVUT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BOARD (Project # 5110-04-1) Prepared by: The Department of Environment Kivalliq Region P.O. Box 120 Arviat, NU. X0C 0E0 November, 2006 Title: Vegetation mapping in the Kivalliq using digital Landsat TM 5/7 data. Project Leader: Mitch Campbell Regional Wildlife Biologist Department of Environment Box 120 Arviat, NU. X0C 0E0 Ph: (867)857-2828 Fax: (867)857-2828 e-mail: [email protected] Project Summary: The Kivalliq Habitat Mapping project began as a pilot study in July/August 2000. The pilot study was successful initiating the projects expansion to cover the entire Kivalliq Region. From August 8-14th 2000, approximately 200 plant communities in the Banks Lake study area were visited and plant type and percent cover recorded. During August 2001 160 sites were visited and plants and their percent cover values recorded in the Tehak Lake area. During August 2002 240 plant communities were examined in the Beverly lake area and 65 sites in the Lyon Inlet area, again in August 2003 240 sites in the Lyon Inlet area were sampled, in 2004 600 sites were sampled in the Baker Lake, Rankin Inlet and Snowbank River areas, while in 2005 presently 450 plant communities were sampled in the Princess Mary Lake and Brown Lake areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1 - Study Report
    EFFECTS OF EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE BAKER LAKE AREA VOLUME 1 - STUDY REPORT Prepared for : Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Ottawa, Ontario Prepared by: Interdisciplinary Systems Ltd. Winnipeg, Manitoba This report comprises two volumes: the text in this volume and eleven February 1978 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people from government, industry, and commerce have provided information necessary for the preparation of this report. We express appreciation and thanks to them all. We particularly acknowledge Baker Lake study advisory committee members Louis Tapatai, Peter Kaluraqu, William Anautalik, Moses Nagyugalik, Francis Kaluraq, and Jonah Amitnaaq who reviewed the key points and conclusions of the study in its later stages. Joan Scottie gave invaluable assistance throughout the study as local coordinator, and Basil Aptaniq and Edwin Eveo served as interpreters during the interviews, Finally, we thank all the people of Baker Lake who provided us with information and guidance. The authors, nonetheless, assume all responsibility for interpretations of data and conclusions presented in this report. CONTRIBUTORS R. E. England, Project Leader 0. H. Boyd, Renewable Resource Use G. R, P. Mutch, Mammals and Birds W. Hayden, Fish M. Fedak, Cartography K. M. Johnston, Economic Appraisals N. W. Emslie, Exploration and Development Scenarios ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Since 1969, Baker Lake residents have expressed concernabout the effects of mineral exploration activities on renewable resources, particularly caribou, sustaining their community. Responding to these concerns, the Minister of Indianand Northern Affairs in March 1977 issued a temporary "halt" on land-use activities in a 78,000 km 2 (30,000 mi2) area around Baker Lake and announced that a study into the potential effects of exploration activities in the area would be undertaken.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text direcUy from the original or copy submilted. Thus, sorne thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quallty of this reproduction is dependent upon the quallty of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. ln the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Aise, if unauthorized copyright matarial had ta be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings. charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from 18ft ta right in equal sections with small overtaps. Photographs induded in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9- black and white photographie prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly ta arder. ProQuest Information and leaming 300 North Zeeb Raad, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 USA 800-521.Q600 • Department ofGeography, McGill University Montreal, Quebec Inuit Place Names and Land-use History on the Harvaqtuuq [Kazan River], Nunavut Territory A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction ofthe requirement for the degree of Master ofAns in Geography by Darren Keith lanuary,2000 Copyright by Darren Keith 2000 National Ubrary Bibliothèque nationale 1+1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie 5eNiC8S services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Research Kivalliq
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH IN THE KIVALLIQ REGION OF NUNAVUT WITH IMPLICATIONS TO THE NEEDS OF NUNAVUMMIUT Mitch Campbell1 1Regional Wildlife Biologist, Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, P.O. Box 120, Arviat, NU X0C 0E0 2007 Final Wildlife Report, No. 18 Campbell, M. 2007. Wildlife research in the Kivalliq Region of Nunavut with implications to the needs of Nunavummiut. Government of Nunavut, Department of Environment, Final Wildlife report: 18, Iqaluit, 34 pp. Wildlife Research in The Kivalliq Region of Nunavut With Implications to The Needs of Nunavummiut 1) Review of Wildlife and Habitat Management Programs for Terrestrial Species in Nunavut. 1.1)Kivalliq Region: Kivalliq Research Initiatives: 1.1.1 - Qamanirjuaq Caribou Monitoring Program, Qamanirjuaq Caribou Classification Studies, Qamanirjuaq Condition and Disease Monitoring, 1.1.2 - Beverly Caribou Population Monitoring Studies, 1.1.3 - Northeast Mainland Caribou Collaring and Delineation Studies, 1.1.4 - Southampton Island Caribou Condition Studies, Southampton Island Population Monitoring Studies, 1.1.5 - Nunavut Wide Ungulate Genetic Studies, 1.1.6 - Central Kivalliq and Northeast Kitikmeot Muskox Studies, 1.1.7 - Kivalliq Wide Ecological Land Classification Studies, 1.1.8 - Conservation Education Production of Kivalliq Research Results on CD Titled “Journey of The Caribou”. 1.1.1 Qamanirjuaq Caribou Monitoring Program, Qamanirjuaq Caribou Classification Studies, and Qamanirjuaq Condition and Disease Monitoring The above programs studying the Qamanirjuaq Caribou Population (Figure 1) have been partnered with the Kivalliq Wildlife Board (KWB), the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board (NWMB), the Beverly and Qamanirjuaq Caribou Management Board (BQCMB), the Local HTO’s (Hunter and Trapper Organizations) of Arviat, Whale Cove, Rankin Inlet and Baker Lake, and the Jurisdictions of the North West Territories (NWT) and Manitoba (Campbell 2006 interim report) (Interim and final reports on these studies are listed in Appendix 1).
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Ecological Land Classification Summary
    Kivalliq Ecological Land Classification Map Atlas 3-1 3 Ecological Land Classification Summary 3.1 Program Summary The development of a land cover mapping program for an area as large as the Kivalliq region (over 410,000 km2) involved substantial effort. The process incorporated many steps, all influenced by time, expense and environmental conditions. In order to attain the volume of information (imagery and field data) required to cover such a large area, the program was conducted over multiple years. This section outlines the approach followed to complete the Ecological Land Classification (ELC) mapping program. At an overview level, the process involved the acquisition of satellite imagery, followed by fieldwork to describe land cover attributes, and then subsequent analysis to compile the results into the ELC data product. The sections that follow describe the approach taken for each of the major components: • Satellite image processing and stratification • Field program • Image classification and data analysis • Accuracy assessment • Data Limitations These sections are followed by a detailed description of each ELC class. 3.2 Satellite Image Processing and Stratification Satellite imagery is the key source of information used for the delineation of ecological land classes. The results of the field program provide a detailed picture of what exists on the ground in specific locations, however, the imagery provides the birds-eye view that facilitates mapping the distribution of vegetation patterns. Landsat satellite imagery has long been the accepted standard for regional mapping of this nature. One pass of the satellite covers a scene swath over 160 kilometres wide, with each pixel in the image representing 25 square metres of the ground surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Dene (Nation); Environmental Attitudes; *Knowledge Acquisition; Northwest Territories; *Sense of Place; World Views
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 356 927 RC 019 102 AUTHOR Raffan, James TITLE Frontier, Homeland and Sacred Space: A Collaborative Investigation into Cross-Cultural Perceptions of Place in the Thelon Game Sanctuary, Northwest Territories. PUB DATE 9 Mar 92 NOTE 439p.; Ph.D. Dissertation, Queen's University, Canada. PUB TYPE Dissertations/Theses Doctoral Dissertations (041) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC18 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS American Indians; *Canada Natives; Cross Cultural Studies; *Cultural Differences; Eskimos; *Experiential Learning; Foreign Countries; *Interdisciplinary Approach; *Land Use; Sociocultural Patterns; Whites IDENTIFIERS Dene (Nation); Environmental Attitudes; *Knowledge Acquisition; Northwest Territories; *Sense of Place; World Views ABSTRACT This dissertation explores how landscape acts as teacher in shaping perceptions of place. At the core of the study is the Thelon Game Sanctuary, located in the central Northwest Territories of Canada. This contentious piece of land has been used historically and is claimed currently by both Dene and Inuit groups. The land also has an intriguing European exploration history, and is valued by various Euro-Canadians for its wilderness characteristics or for its potential for uranium mining. The Chipewyan Dene of Lutsel R'e (Snowdrift) and the Caribou Inuit of Qamanittuaq (Baker Lake) were major primary sources and active collaborators in this study, using project materials for local history and school activities. Using the literature of place for theoretical perspective and the principles of "new ethnography" for method, this investigation employs for analysis historical, scientific, and ethnographic texts, as well as songs, stories, reports, interviews, photographs, literature, poetry, and films. Analysis suggests that four major components contribute to a sense of place (that is, defining oneself in terms of a given piece of land).
    [Show full text]