Silva Balcanica, 20(3)/2019

Eco-biological characteristic of the flora of the Dabeto Protected Area

Stoyan Georgiev1, Koycho Koev2, Teodora Barakova1, Nikolay Kochev3 1Field Crops Institute – Chirpan 2Faculty of Biology, University of Plovdiv 3Primary school “Hristo Botev” – Krumovo

Abstract

The present study explores the floristic diversity in the Dabeto Protected Area (PA), situated in the vicinity of Novi Izvor Village, Plovdiv District. Vascular in PA Dabeto were studied through systematic observations and collecting herbarium material during the growing seasons in 2014-2016. The list includes 160 vascular plants of 124 genera and 42 families. The vast majority of the plants are perennial herbaceous species, hemicryptophytes, species with European and Mediterranean origin, thermophytes or mezophytes and heliophytes. The species were grouped with respect to the soil moisture, temperature and light. Additionally, they were characterised with respect to the life forms and floristic elements.

Key words: protected area Dabeto, NATURE 2000, medical flora, vascular plants

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the current study was to establish a comprehensive list of the vascular plants in Dabeto Protected Area (PA) and to provide floristic analysis and explore their ecological and biological characteristics. This protected area was declared by the Ministry of Environment and Water (MOEW), aiming to protect a century-old oak forest dominated by Quercus frainetto Ten. and Quercus robur L. The age of the trees varies from 200 to 250 years and their height reaches 12 m. The area of the protected area was updated at 10.3383 ha in 2006. The entire area of commented territory is part of the NATURA 2000 zone BG0000438 „Reka Chinardere”. Brief information about the Dabeto PA is presented in a booklet issued by the Regional Inspectorate of Environment and Water – Plovdiv (2016). Generally, there are two tree species and three shrub species identified in this publication. Dominant species of the grassy vegetation are of the families Poaceae and Fabaceae. In the protected area, there are no comprehensive studies on flora and vegetation. The lack of detailed information underlines the need for our study, which will be valuable both for the protected area itself and for an area included in the NATURA 2000 network in Bulgaria. The present eco-biological research completes the gaps in knowledge about the flora and vegetation of the study area. The protected area is located in the vicinity of Plovdiv of the Upper Thracian Plain and according to the recent phytogeographical subdivision (Bondev, 1991) falls within the territory of the Thracian Lowland floristic region.

39 According to the physiographic division of Bulgaria (Galabov, 1982), the examined territory falls within the Kraishtensko – Tundjanska (transitional) zone, a region within the Upper Thracian Plain in the Western sub-region. The territory of the Dabeto PA is characterised with relatively mild winter and hot summer, with well-defined drought, especially in the months August-September, which are the driest months of the year. The average annual rainfall is 551 L/km2, which defines the area as a place with little annual rainfall (Galabov, 1982). The average annual temperature is around 12.1°С, which matches the indicated temperature for the country between 11 and 12 °С (Galabov, 1982). The average air humidity is 72% and corresponds to the average for the country (Galabov, 1982).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The diversity of vascular flora in the Dabeto PA was studied based on systematic observations and collecting of material during the growing seasons of 2014-2016. The periodicity of the visits was conformed to the climatic conditions in the region and determined by their phenology. The earliest sampling campaigns were conducted from the beginning of February 2014, and the latest – from the end of September 2016. This allowed us to collate a comprehensive list of vascular plants growing in the protected area. The determination of the species was done following the Flora of Bulgaria (Yordanov (ed.), 1963-1979; Velcehv (ed.), 1982-1989), Flora of Bulgaria (Kozhuharov, 1995) and Flora of Bulgaria (Stoyanov et al., 1966-1967), Key of Trees and Shrubs in Bulgaria (Gramatikov, 1992), Key of Plants in Bulgaria (Delipavlov, Cheshmedzhiev, (eds.), 2011). The processing of herbarium materials and characterising of vascular flora was carried out following standard methods (Gusev et al., 2004). Characterisation of vascular plants was done based on biological types and life forms according to Raunkiaer (1934). Floristic elements were characterised following the classification of B. Stefanov (1943) and the classification of Walter, adapted to the flora of Bulgaria (Asyov, Petrova, 2012). The identified taxa were divided into ecological groups based on the most important ecological factors: water, temperature and light. An account and analysis of the flowering period for all identified species were done. The names of the plants are in accordance with The Euro+Med PlantBase, the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean diversity (http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/ [accessed 12.07.2019]) and Key of Plants in Bulgaria (Delipavlov, Cheshedzhiev, 2011).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results from the our analysis summarised the data from our field studies researches and were complemented by review on available published literature. As a result, it has been established that in the Dabeto PA there are 160 species of vascular plants. They are distributed in 124 genera and 42 families, which is 4.4% from the

40 species, 14.6% from the genera and 33.0% from the families in the Bulgarian flora (Asiov, Petrova, 2012). Systematic list of vascular plants in the Dabeto PA Pinophyta Cupressaceae: Jniperus communis L.; Pinaceae: Pinus nigra Arnold.

Magnoliophyta Liliopsida Araceae: Arum maculatum L.; Cyperaceae: Carex caryophillea Lotourr., Carex hallerana Asso, Carex michelii Host, Carex sylvatica Hudson; Iridaceae: Iris graminea L.; Liliaceae: Muscari neglectum Guss., Ornitogalum umbellatum L., Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.) Druce, Scila autumnalis L.; Orchidaceae: Orchis purpurea Hudson, Orchis simia Lam.; Poaceae: Aegilops cylindrica Host, Agrostis capillaris L., Alopecurus pratensis L., Avena fatua L., Bromus arvensis L., Bromus sterilis L., Calamagrostis arundinacea (L.) Roth, Calamagrostis epigeios (L.) Roth, Chrysopogon gryllus (L.) Trin., Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., Dactylis glomerata L., Festuca heterophylla Lam., Festuca valesiaca Scheicher ex Gaudin, Hordeum murinum L., Lolium perenne L., Poa bulbosa L., Poa pratensis L., Poa trivialis L., Sesleria latifolia (Ademovič) Degen.

Magnolipsida Aceraceae: Acer campestre L., Acer tataricum L.; : Chaerophyllum temulentum L., Conium macculatum L., Daucus carota L., Eryngium campestre L., Myrrhoides nodosa (L.) Cannon, grandiflora (L.) Hoffm.; Araliaceae:Hedera helix L.; Asteraceae: Achilea millefolium L., Anthemis arvensis L., Anthemis tinctoria L., Arctium lappa L., Bellis perennis L., Centaurea cyanus L., Centaurea solstitialis L., Centaurea thracica (Janka) Hayek, Cichorium intybus L., Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., Crepis tectorum L., Inula conyza DC., Onopordum acanthium L., Taraxacum officinale Weber, Tragopogon pratensis L., Xeranthemum annuum L.; Boraginaceae: Buglossoides purpurocaerulea (L.) I. M. Johnston, Echium italicum L., Echium vulgare L., Myosotis arvensis (L.) Hill, Myosotis stricta Link ex Roemer & Schultes; Brassicaceae: Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara & Grande, Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medic., Cardaria draba (L.) Desv., Erophila verna (L.) Chevall., Rorippa thracica (Griseb.) Fritsch, Thlaspi arvense L.; Campanulaceae: Campanula rapunculoides L.; Cannabaceae: Humulus lupulus L.; Caprifoliaceae: Sambucus ebulus L.; Caryophyllaceae: Cerastium arvense L., Dianthus giganteus D’ Úrv., Scleranthus perennis L., Stellaria media (L.) Vill., Silene italica (L.) Pers., Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke; Convolvulaceae: Convolvulus arvensis L.; Cornaceae: Cornus mas L.; Corylaceae: Carpinus orientalis Mill.; Dipsacaceae: Scabiosa ochroleuca L.; Euphorbiaceae: Euphorbia cyparissias L.; Fabaceae: Astragalus glycyphyllos L., Coronilla varia L., Corothamnus procumbens (Waldst. & Kit.) C. Presl, Lathyrus nissolia L., Lathyrus pratensis L., Lotus corniculatus L., Medicago minima (L.) Bartal., Melilotus alba Medic., Onobrychis viciifolia Scop., Robinia pseudoacacia L., Trifolium campestre Schreber, Trifolium micranthum Viv., Trifolium repens L., Vicia angustifolia Grufb., Vicia cracca L., Vicia grandiflora Scop., Vicia tetrasperma (L.) Schreber, Vicia varia Host; Fagaceae:

41 Quercus frainetto Ten., Quercus polycarpa Schur, Quercus pubescens Willd., Quercus robur L.; Fumariaceae: Corydalis bulbosa (L.) DC., Fumaria officinalis L.; Geraniaceae: Erodium cicutarium (L.) L’Her., Geranium robertianum L., Geranium sanguineum L.; Hypericaceae: Hypericum perforatum L.; Lamiaceae: Ajuga reptans L., Balota nigra L., Clinopodium vulgare L., Glechoma hederacea L., Lamium purpureum L., Prunella laciniata (L.) L., Prunella vulgaris L., Salvia nutans L., Stachys annua (L.) L., Stachys germanica L., Teucrium chamaedrys L., Thymus pannonicus All.; Oleaceae: Ligustrum vulgare L.; Onagraceae: Epilobium paviflorum Schreber; Plantaginaceae: Plantago lanceolata L., Plantago major L., Veronica cymbalaria Bodard, Veronica hederifolia L., Veronica triloba (Opiz) A. Kerner; Polygonaceae: Polygonum aviculare L., Rumex acetosella L.; Primulaceae: Cyclamen coum Mill.; Ranunculaceae: Anemone ranunculoides L., Clematis vitalba L., Consolida regalis S.F.Gray, Ficaria verna Hudson, Ranunculus repens L.; Rhamnaceae: Paliurus spina-christi Mill.; Rosaceae: Agrimonia eupatoria L., Crataegus monogyna Jacq., Filipendula vulgaris Moench, Fragaria vesca L., Geum urbanum L., Potentilla argentea L., Potentilla erecta (L.) Räuschel, Prunus cerasifera Ehrh., Prunus spinosa L., Pyrus pyraster Burgsd., Rosa canina L., Rubus caesius L., Sanguisorba minor Scop.; Rubiaceae: Galium album Mill., Galium aparine L., Galium verum L.; Scrophulariaceae: Verbascum blattaria L.; Ulmaceae: Ulmus minor Mill.; Urticaceae: Urtica dioica L.; Violaceae: Viola arvensis Murray, Viola odorata L. Three of the recorded species are relevant to conservation: Cyclamen coum Mill., included in Annex 3 of the Bulgarian Biodiversity Act, Orchis purpurea Hudson and Orchis simia Lam., included in Appendix 2 of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Two species of the identified plants belonged to Pinophyta, while the rest belonged to Magnoliophyta. Thirty-one of them belonged to class Liliopsida, distributed in 22 genera and six families and 127 species awee of class Magnoliopsida, distributed in 100 genera and 34 families. The richest families on the territory of the studied area were: Poaceae - represented by 19 species, Fabaceae - represented by 18 species, Asteraceae - represented by 15 species, Rosaceae - represented by 13 species and Lamiaceae - represented by 12 species. The distribution of the taxa according to biological types showed that the perennial herbaceous species were the most common with 84 species (52.5 %) of all vascular plants, followed by the annuals - 33 species (20.6 %) and trees and shrubs with 23 species (14.3 %) each. The remaining part of the species belonged to transitional biological types (Table 1). According to the biological spectrum of the studied species, most were hemicryptophytes (H) – 74 species or 46.2 % of the total number of plants in the protected area, followed by therophytes (Th) – 33 species (20.6 %), phanerophytes (Ph) – 21 species (13.2 %), cryptophytes (Cr) – ten species (6.2 %) and chamephytes (Ch) – 2 species (1.3 %). The remaining species were of transitional life forms, among them the most (11 species, 6.9 %) were these, which might be hemicryptophytes or therophytes (H-Th), depending on the habitat conditions. The presence of a significant proportion of therophytes was determined by the sub-Mediterranean nature of the climate.

42 Table 1. Distribution of the vascular plants from the Dabeto Protected Area (PA) based on biological types

Biological type Number of taxa % from plants in Dabeto PA tree 7 4.4 tree-shrub 1 0.6 shrub-tree 6 3.8 shrub 9 5.6 perennial 84 52.5 biennial-perennial 6 3.8 biennial 5 3.1 annual-biennial 9 5.6 annual 33 20.6 Total 160 100

The distribution of vascular plants in phytogeographic centres, following the classification of B. Stefanov (1943), showed that the greatest part or 45.0 % were thermophytes from the Southern Continental Centre, followed by the thermophytes from the Northern Continental Centre with 28.0%, the moesotherms of the Silvo- boreal Centre with 13.0%, thermophytes and moesotherms from the Mountainous Centre with 11.0 %. Plants from other phytogeographic centres accounted for 2.0 %, while least presented were the thermophytes from the Mediterranean Centre – 1.0 %. According to their mobility, the analysed plants were distributed as follows: 21 (13.2 %) were stationary species, 55 (34.3 %) were moving species with secondary expanded areas and 84 plants (52.5 %) were species that had appeared by secondary displacement (Stefanov, 1943). These data are evidence of significant anthropogenic interference within the territory of the protected area in the past. Analysing vascular plants by floristic elements showed that those with European component dominated with 92 species or 57.5 %. Among them the most numerous were the Euro-Asian (Eur-As) with 32 species (20.0 %), the Euro-Mediterranean (Eur- Med) with 30 species (18.9 %), the Euro-Siberian (Eur-Sib) with 12 species (7.5 %), the European (Eur) with ten species (6.2 %). Second was the group of the species with Mediterranean affiliation - 64 species or 40.0 %; among them the most numerous were the Euro-Mediterranean (Eur-Med) with 30 species (18.9 %), followed by sub- Mediterranean (subMed) with 19 species (11.9 %), the Pontic-Mediterranean (Pont- Med) with four species (2.5 %) and the Mediterranean (Med) with one species (0.6 %). There was a large amount of Cosmopolitan (Kos) plants – nine species (5.6 %; Table 2). The presence of a large number of cosmopolitan species indicates an initial phase of habitat disturbance. The distribution of the studied plants according to their period of flowering showed that the most active period was from May to September. During this period, 95 taxa blossomed or 59.3 % of all plants. Among them, most species blossomed in June- August – 17 species, May-August and June-September – 13 species each, May-June and May-September – seven species each, etc.

43 Table 2. Distribution of the vascular plants from the Dabeto Protected Area (PA) based on floral elements according to the adapted classification of Walter (Asyov, Petrova, 2012).

Floral elements by Walter (2012) Number of taxa % from plants in Dabeto PA Adv 1 0.6 Ap-Bal 1 0.6 Bal 1 0.6 Boreal 10 6.2 Eur 10 6.2 Eur-As 32 20.0 Eur-Med 30 18.9 Eur-Med-As 1 0.6 Eur-OT 1 0.6 Eur-Sib 12 7.5 Eur-subMed 6 3.8 Eux 1 0.6 Eux-Pont 1 0.6 Kos 9 5.6 Med 1 0.6 Med-OT 1 0.6 Pont 4 2.5 Pont-Med 4 2.5 Pont-subMed 2 1.3 subBoreal 13 8.2 subMed 19 11.9 Total 160 100

According to their relation with water as a factor, dominated vascular plants of the mezophyte group with 116 species (72.5%), followed by the xeromezophytes – 27 species (16.9%), mezohygrophytes with seven species (4.4%), xerophytes with five species (3.1%). The analysis of the vascular plants distribution in terms of the light factor showed prevalence of heliophytes (68.1 %), followed by hemi-scyophytes (20.0 %) and the rest were schyophytes (11.9%). The significant presence of heliophyte species could be explained by the fact that the forest is reduced and open spaces are being used for grazing. According to their relation to the heat, the species were divided into two groups. Thermophytes were the bigger group with 123 species (76.9 %) and the remaining 37 species (23.1 %) belonged to the group of the moesotherms. The dominance of thermophyllic species coild be directly related to the influence of the Mediterranean climate, penetrating along the Maritsa River (Galabov, 1982).

44 CONCLUSION

Our results of the study on the vascular plants in the Dabeto PA showed that there were 160 plant species of 124 genera and 42 families. Among these plants, the majority were perennial herbaceous species, hemicryptophytes, species of European and Mediterranean origin, thermophytes, mezophytes and heliophytes. The threats within the protected area are anthropogenic in nature, such as pollution with domestic waste, burning of fire and grazing of domestic animals. This is confirmed by the relatively large number of secondary and cosmopolitan plants within the studied area, which indicates a significant anthropogenic interference with the processes occurring in the vegetation cover of the protected area. The reason for this is the proximity of the studied area to the Novi Izvor Village. These problems and the presence of the alien species Robinia pseudoacacia L. threaten the naturalness of the protected area and the possibility of its recovery.

REFERENCES

Asyov, B., A. Petrova. (Eds.). 2012. Synopsis of the Higher Flora of Bulgaria. Chorological and Floristic Elements. BFB. Sofia. 494 p. Bondev, I. 1991 The Vegetation of Bulgaria, map scale 1: 600 000 with explanatory text. BAS, Sofia. Bulgarian Biodiversity Act. State Gazette 2002, 2018. Velchev, V. (Ed.) 1982-1989. Flora of NR Bulgaria. Vol.8, 9. BAS. Sofia. Delipavlov, D., I. Cheshmedziev, M. Popova, D. Terziiska, I. Kovachev. 2011. Key of Plants in Bulgaria. Academic Press, Agriculture University. Plovdiv. 591 pp. Gramaticov, D. 1992. Key of Trees and Shrubs in Bulgaria. Intelsys, Plovdiv. 375 pp. Gusev, Ch., S. Bancheva, D. Dimitrov, D. Denchev, Ts. Pavlova, Y. Koeva, D. Patronov. 2004.Floristics Characteristics of the Biosphere Reserve Uzunbudzhak of Strandzha Mts.. Nature Park Strandja. Sofia – Malko Tarnovo. 76 pp. Galabov, Zh. (Ed.). 1982. Geography of Bulgaria. Physical Geography. BAS. Sofia. 358 pp. Yordanov, D. (Ed.) 1963-1979 Flora of R Bulgaria. Vol. 1-7. BAS. Sofia Kozhuharov, S. (Ed.) 1995 Flora of Bulgaria. Vol.10. BAS. Sofia. Stefanov, B. 1943. Phytogeographic Elements in Bulgaria. Knipegraf. Sofia. 509 pp. Stoyanov, N., B. Stefanov, B. Kitanov. 1966-1967. Flora of Bulgaria. Vol. 1-2. Art and Sciences. Sofia. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The Life Forms of Plant and Statistical Plant Geography. Oxford, Clarendon. Regional Inspectorate of Environment and Water – Plovdiv. 2016. Protected Areas in Plovdiv region. Regional Inspectorate of Environment and Water – Plovdiv. 96 pp. The Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. 2011. Last update 01 February 2018. URL: http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/query.asp.

E-mail: [email protected]

45