Aeronautical Science Course of Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aeronautical Science Course of Study DOCUMENT RESUME ED 052 946 SE 011 183 TITLE Aeronautical Sciencevt: Course of Study. INSTITUTION Calitornia State Dept. of Education, Sacramento.; Southbay Union High School District, RedondoBeach, Calit. SPONS AGENCY Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Oct 69 NOTE 252p. AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent ot Documents, Government Prnting Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 ($2.25) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.65 HC-$9.87 DESCRIPTORS Aerospace Technology, *Aviation Technology, *Course Descriptions, Flight Training, *Instructional Materials, Resource Guides, *Science Education, Secondary School Science ABSTRACT This revision of "Aeronautical Science Course of Study for Calitornia High Schools," first issued in 1967, is designed by and for the use of teachers of high,school aeronautical courses. It ditters from other aeronautical instructional materials in its emphasis on inquiry, exploration, and open-ended experimentation. The eleven units may be used separately or as an entire course. The first nine units, designed for thirty-six weeks of classroom study, include: basic aeronautics, meteorology, navigation, FAA regulations, speed of sound, physiology of flight, man in space, history of aviation, and economic factors. The last two units deal with actual flight training. Lists of films and publications are provided. (RS) AERONAUTICAL SCIENCECOURSE OF STUDY U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION 1HIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO DUCED EXAC1LY AS RECEIVED I ROM 1HE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG INATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN IONS STATED DO NO1 NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDU CATION POSITION OR POLICY OCTOBER 1969 Ch 4 ) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATIONADMINISTRATION AERONAUTICAL SCIENCE COURSE OF STUDY This document is a revision of the original publication entitled "Aeronautical Science Course of Study for Cali- fornia High Schools" and first published in a limited quantity in July 1967. Designed by and for the use of teachers of high school aeronautical courses and financed under an NDEA contract with the California State Depart- ment of Education. This revision includes: (1) aviation statistical data as of December 1968; (2) "Man in Space" unit projected through Apollo 20; and (3) an expanded section on sources of reference materials. Produced Cooperatively by The Redondo Union High School of the South Bay Union High School District, Redondo Beach, California and the California State Department of Education GA-20-10 The contents of this publication reflect the views of the Editorial Committee (See page xvii) which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily re- flect the official views or policy of the Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402.1'rice $2.24 it ,. -4441t1Z.4.t" , -..-- MAN'S FIRST POWERED FLIGHT, KITTY HAWK, NORTH CAROLINA, DEC.-;17.. 1903 4". M APOLLO 11 AT LIFT OFF ASTRONAUT ALDRIN AND LEM CAPE KENNEDY, FLORIDA TRANQUILITY BASE, MOON JULY 16, 1969 JULY 20, 1969 Wilbur and Orville Wright DON H. CLAUSEN COMMITTEE, REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS PUBLIC WORKS 1ST DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA "THERump.= Mwrma DISTRICT" SUISCOMMITEEEL RIVERS AND HARBOUS WASHINGTON orrict, FLOOD CONTROL 1035 Houser OFFICE BUILDING Congreo at tbe Ziniteb Otateo ROADS WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515 FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS PHONE, 225-3311 34otle at it eprolentatibeg ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AREA Coca 202 COM NI ITTtCI acsbington, 0. C. INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS MIOMMTOFFMKt 206 ROSCNSCRO BUILDING SaIRCOM MITTERSI 306 MENDOCINO AVENUE IRRIGATION AND RECLAMATION SANTA ROSA. CALIFORNIA 95401 October 7, 1969 NATIONAL PARKS AND RECREATION PHONE! 545-8544 PUBLIC LANDS As one who has participated actively in both aviation and aviation educationjor more than two decades,,I,commend California educators at the local and state level for their imagination and initiative in develop- ing this "Aeronautical Science Course of Study" for teachers. As an elected representative of the First District of California and as President of the Congressional Flying Club, I recognize that there is growing national interest in capitalizing on the motivation, aviation and aerospace studies provide, for students as well as teachers. Thus, I see huge potential benefit in the sharing of this "Aeronautical Science Course of Study" material which the Department of Transportation,t-Federal Aviation Administration, Aviation Education staff members have made possible through this publishing effort. Leaders of government, education and industry are increasingly recog- nizing the important role that aviation and aerospace science study provides for youth, teachers, parents and all who are interested in the future of this great nation. On the next page is tangible evidence of the importance placed upon education in man's conquest of air and space. California Governor Ronald Reagan's Proclamation, which establishes the school year beginning September 1969 as "Aerospace-Aviation Education Year" throughout the State of California is a prime example of the interest of elected public officials in encouraging aviation and aerospace education programs in our schools. It is my hope that educators in every part of the nation will find ways to use either directly, or modified to suit local needs, the valuable suggestions included in this publication. Co gr Clausen 1st Distri of California Chairman, vernor's Aerospace-Aviation EducationTask Force 11 .1Nr-41.1.111BA vt. Zxectidue Department tote of California P R 0 C L A M. A -T I 0 N WHEREAS, The successful flight of Apollo 11 has klindled the spirit and captured the imagination of mankind asilhaVe few events in history, and was a demonstration of man's ability to soar beyond the limitations of earth and to achieve the apparently impossible; and WHEREAS, Its success goes far beyond the beginning of space exploration and proves beyond do-ubt that in a creative society we can do anything'we truly ,commit ourselves to do; and WHEREAS, In\January of,this Year I appointed the Aero- space-Aviation. Education Task Force,-which is chaired by Congressman Don dlaUsen, to study and submit recommendations on Californiars'edUcational program in the field of'aerospace and aviation, _NOW, THEREFORE, I, RONALD'REAGAN,. GOVERNOR OFCALIFORNIA,' do hereby proclaiOhe year beginning with-the opening of our schooli in September, 1969, as AEROSPACE.-AVIATION EDUCATION YEAR ; -and-.urge.-allieducators_inLthe_Stateof Californt_,_et._e _ every scholastic level, and in- °field of study, tc;(1) enrich their own oloUrses with aerospace-aViatich material,: (2) inform their'Students of the depth and breadth of career, opportunitidS in erospace-aviation-Talready,ihe largest non-. agricultural induStry in California,s(3) develop insights into the vital et,Cial factOrs involving aerospace, and eviet19n:, with the lives of all_Cal,iforniane," (4) se#0.,everY.OPPrtuuity to translate theiexcitement of- cur success inthOloon'1anding: to optiMismofor/4inding'solUtions to our pressing,' k°bleills on earth and (44rove 'again that cooperation'is, the 'best weapon gainst7confrontatiOn. ' , 2 , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have IlereunteseElmY,hand- and . ,causecl,the,dreat'Seal7of the'Ztateof'ealiforniet9 be affixed- this:- 19th-:day of:SepteMbere One ThoUsand' -Nine Hundred'Sixty Nine. Goals and Objectives of California Governor's Advisory Task Force on Aerospace-Aviation Education 1. To develop within the California public system of education, a planned and coordinated aerospace-aviation education program, which embodies all phases and all aspects of aviation; aeronautical, and space education. 2. To serve all levels--elementary, secondary, higher and adult education on a continuing basis in the State of California. 3. To serve the curriculum areas of general education, vocational education, adult, and in-service education. 4. To study, evaluate, and implement the findings of the California Aviation Education Advisory Commission established by the Californ:;_a State Department of Edu- cation in 1967. 5. To encourage and stimulate the formation of County Aerospace- Aviation Advisory Committees to better coordinate the implementation of programs through 'established and contemplated educational facilities and their administration. 6. To afford particular recognition and consideration to the recommendations of the Vocational Education Director and the aviation consultants to the Department of Education on how best to coordinate the integration of aerospace-aviation educa- tional materials into the general and vocational education curricula-consistent with the demands and requirements of the jet and 'pace ages. 7. To draw particular attention to the extraordinary advantages of including aircraft control manipulation as an integral part of the vocational and general education programs through the use of stationary classroom flight simulators in elementary and secondary schools, and through actual flight training programs in high schools and junior colleges where easy access to airports is available. Excerpts from Address by Congressman Donald H. Clausen to the Aerospace-Education Task Force, Sacramento, California, June 161 1969 Aviation and air transportation now play, and will continue to play, a dominant role in the movement of goods, services, and people throughout the State of Califor- nia, the United States, and indeed,.throughout the entire Western
Recommended publications
  • Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc., Retirement Plan, Et Al. V. The
    Case 1:19-cv-02020-WFK-PK Document 1 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 41 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _________________________________________ ) JEWELTEX MANUFACTURING INC., ) CASE NO. RETIREMENT PLAN, Individually and On ) Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ) vs. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED THE BOEING COMPANY, DENNIS A. ) MUILENBURG, ROBERT A. BRADWAY, ) DAVID L. CALHOUN, ARTHUR D. COLLINS, ) JR., KENNETH M. DUBERSTEIN, ADMIRAL ) EDMUND P. GIAMBASTIANI, JR., LYNN J. ) GOOD, NIKKI R. HALEY, LAWRENCE W. ) KELLNER, CAROLINE B. KENNEDY, ) EDWARD M. LIDDY, SUSAN C. SCHWAB, ) RONALD A. WILLIAMS, and MIKE S. ) ZAFIROVSKI, ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ Plaintiff Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc., Retirement Plan (“Plaintiff”), by and through its undersigned attorneys, alleges the following based upon information and belief, except as to those allegations concerning Plaintiff, which are alleged upon personal knowledge. Plaintiff’s information and belief is based upon, among other things, the investigation conducted by his counsel which included, among other things: (a) a review and analysis of regulatory filings of The Boeing Company (“Boeing” or the “Company”) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); (b) a review and analysis of press releases and media reports issued and disseminated by Boeing; (c) a review of other publicly available information concerning Boeing, including articles in the news media and analyst reports; (d) a review and analysis of regulatory investigations and reports; and (e) complaints and related materials in litigation commenced against some or all of the Defendants Case 1:19-cv-02020-WFK-PK Document 1 Filed 04/08/19 Page 2 of 41 PageID #: 2 pertaining to Boeing and the fatal accidents involving the 737 Max series of aircraft (the “737 Max Accidents”) and their causes and aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • LESSON 3 Significant Aircraft of World War II
    LESSON 3 Significant Aircraft of World War II ORREST LEE “WOODY” VOSLER of Lyndonville, Quick Write New York, was a radio operator and gunner during F World War ll. He was the second enlisted member of the Army Air Forces to receive the Medal of Honor. Staff Sergeant Vosler was assigned to a bomb group Time and time again we read about heroic acts based in England. On 20 December 1943, fl ying on his accomplished by military fourth combat mission over Bremen, Germany, Vosler’s servicemen and women B-17 was hit by anti-aircraft fi re, severely damaging it during wartime. After reading the story about and forcing it out of formation. Staff Sergeant Vosler, name Vosler was severely wounded in his legs and thighs three things he did to help his crew survive, which by a mortar shell exploding in the radio compartment. earned him the Medal With the tail end of the aircraft destroyed and the tail of Honor. gunner wounded in critical condition, Vosler stepped up and manned the guns. Without a man on the rear guns, the aircraft would have been defenseless against German fi ghters attacking from that direction. Learn About While providing cover fi re from the tail gun, Vosler was • the development of struck in the chest and face. Metal shrapnel was lodged bombers during the war into both of his eyes, impairing his vision. Able only to • the development of see indistinct shapes and blurs, Vosler never left his post fi ghters during the war and continued to fi re.
    [Show full text]
  • Cliffs of Dover Ju87
    JUNKERS JU-87 B-2 “STUKA” GUIDE BY CHUCK (Unit) SPITFIRE HURRICANE BLENHEIM TIGER MOTH BF.109 BF.110 JU-87B-2 JU-88 HE-111 G.50 BR.20M Mk Ia 100 oct Mk IA Rotol 100oct Mk IV DH.82 E-4 C-7 STUKA A-1 H-2 SERIE II TEMPERATURES Water Rad Min Deg C 60 60 - - 40 60 38 40 38 - - Max 115 115 100 90 95 90 95 Oil Rad (OUTBOUND) Min Deg C 40 40 40 - 40 40 30 40 35 50 50 Max 95 95 85 105 85 95 80 95 90 90 Cylinder Head Temp Min Deg C - - 100 - - - - - - 140 140 Max 235 240 240 ENGINE SETTINGS Takeoff RPM RPM 3000 3000 2600 FINE 2350 2400 2400 2300 2400 2400 2520 2200 Takeoff Manifold Pressure UK: PSI +6 +6 +9 BCO ON See 1.3 1.3 1.35 1.35 1.35 890 820 BCO ON GER: ATA ITA: mm HG RPM Gauge • BLABLALBLABClimb RPM RPM 2700 2700 2400 COARSE 2100 2300 2300 2300 2300 2300 2400 2100 30 min MAX 30 min MAX 30 min MAX 30 min MAX 30 min MAX 30 min MAX 30 min MAX Climb Manifold Pressure UK: PSI +6 +6 +5 See 1.23 1.2 1.15 1.15 1.15 700 740 GER: ATA ITA: mm HG RPM Gauge Normal Operation/Cruise RPM 2700 2600 2400 COARSE 2000 2200 2200 2200 2100 2200 2100 2100 RPM Normal Operation/Cruise UK: PSI +3 +4 +3.5 See 1.15 1.15 1.1 1.1 1.10 590 670 GER: ATA Manifold Pressure ITA: mm HG RPM Gauge Combat RPM RPM 2800 2800 2400 COARSE 2100 2400 2400 2300 2300 2300 2400 2100 Combat Manifold Pressure UK: PSI +6 +6 +5 See 1.3 1.3 1.15 1.15 1.15 700 740 GER: ATA ITA: mm HG RPM Gauge 5 min MAX 5 min MAX Emergency Power/ Boost RPM 2850 2850 2600 COARSE 2350 2500 2400 2300 2400 2400 2520 2200 RPM @ km 5 min MAX 5 min MAX 5 min MAX 1 min MAX 5 min MAX 1 min MAX 1 min MAX 1 min MAX 3
    [Show full text]
  • In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware
    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THOMAS P. DiNAPOLI, COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AS ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC VERSION HEAD OF THE NEW YORK STATE FILED ON: June 30, 2020 AND LOCAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, AND AS TRUSTEE FOR THE NEW YORK STATE COMMON RETIREMENT FUND, and FIRE AND POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO, Plaintiffs, v. C.A. No. 2020-0465-AGB KENNETH M. DUBERSTEIN, MIKE S. ZAFIROVSKI, ARTHUR D. COLLINS JR., EDWARD M. LIDDY, ADMIRAL EDMUND P. GIAMBASTIANI JR., DAVID L. CALHOUN, SUSAN C. SCHWAB, RONALD A. WILLIAMS, LAWRENCE W. KELLNER, LYNN J. GOOD, ROBERT A. BRADWAY, RANDALL L. STEPHENSON, CAROLINE B. KENNEDY, W. JAMES MCNERNEY JR., DENNIS A. MUILENBURG, KEVIN G. MCALLISTER, RAYMOND L. CONNER, GREG SMITH, J. MICHAEL LUTTIG, GREG HYSLOP, and DIANA L. SANDS, Defendants. and THE BOEING COMPANY, Nominal Defendant. VERIFIED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT {FG-W0467081.} Plaintiffs Thomas P. DiNapoli, Comptroller of the State of New York, as Administrative Head of the New York State and Local Retirement System, and as Trustee of the New York State Common Retirement Fund, and Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado, stockholders of The Boeing Company (“Boeing,” the “Company,” or “Nominal Defendant”), bring this action on Boeing’s behalf against the current and former officers and directors identified below (collectively, “Defendants”) arising from their failure to monitor the safety of Boeing’s 737 MAX airplanes. The allegations in this Complaint are based on the knowledge of Plaintiffs as to themselves, and on information and belief, including the review of publicly available information and documents obtained under 8 Del.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Name Aero A-101 Airspeed AS-6 Airspeed AS-8 American
    Aircraft Name Aero A-101 Airspeed AS-6 Airspeed AS-8 American Eagle A-129 Arado Ar 66 C Arado Ar 68 E Arado Ar 95 A Arado Ar 95 W Avia 51 Avia BH-33 Avro 594 Avro 626 Avro 643 Beechcraft 17 Bellanca 28-70 Blériot-Spad 111 Blériot-Spad 51 Blériot-Spad 56 Blériot-Spad 91 Bloch MB-200 Bloch MB-210 Boeing 281 (P26 Peashooter) Breda Ba 25 Breda Ba 28 Breda Ba 33 Breda Ba 39 Breda Ba 64 Breda Ba 65 Breguet 460 M4 Breguet Br. 26T Breguet Br. XIX A2 Breguet-Wilbaut 470 T Bristol Bulldog II British Aeroplane Eagle British Aircraft British Aircraft L25 Bücker Bü 131 Bücker Bü 133 Cant Z-501 Cant Z-506 Caproni AP-1 Caproni Ca-100 Caproni Ca-135S Caproni Ca-310 CASA III Caudron C-272 / 273 Caudron C-282 Caudron C-286 Phalene Caudron C-440 to 448 Caudron C-59 / 490 Caudron C-600 / 601 Cierva C-19 Cierva C-30 A Clark GA-43A Comper CLA 7 Consolidated 20-A Consolidated Mod. 17 Fleetster Couzinet 101 de Havilland D.H. 60 de Havilland D.H. 80 de Havilland D.H. 82 de Havilland D.H. 83 de Havilland D.H. 84 de Havilland D.H. 85 de Havilland D.H. 87 de Havilland D.H. 89A de Havilland D.H. 9 de Havilland D.H. 90 Dewoitine D 27 Dewoitine D 370 series Dewoitine D 510TH Dewoitine D 53 Dewoitine D-332/333 Dornier Do 15 Wal Dornier Do 17E Dornier Do 17F Dornier Do 17P Douglas DC-1 Douglas DC-2 Fairchild 91 Fairchild K.R.22C-7E Fairey Feroce/Fantome Farman F-190 / 291 series Farman F-354 Farman F-402 Farman F-480 Fiat AS 1 Fiat BR 20 Fiat CR 20 Fiat CR 30 Fiat CR 32 Fiat G 50 Fiat G 8 Fieseler Fi 156 A / B Fieseler Fi 156 C Fleet 10 Focke-Wulf FW 56 Fokker C.X Fokker
    [Show full text]
  • HELP from ABOVE Air Force Close Air
    HELP FROM ABOVE Air Force Close Air Support of the Army 1946–1973 John Schlight AIR FORCE HISTORY AND MUSEUMS PROGRAM Washington, D. C. 2003 i Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schlight, John. Help from above : Air Force close air support of the Army 1946-1973 / John Schlight. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Close air support--History--20th century. 2. United States. Air Force--History--20th century. 3. United States. Army--Aviation--History--20th century. I. Title. UG703.S35 2003 358.4'142--dc22 2003020365 ii Foreword The issue of close air support by the United States Air Force in sup- port of, primarily, the United States Army has been fractious for years. Air commanders have clashed continually with ground leaders over the proper use of aircraft in the support of ground operations. This is perhaps not surprising given the very different outlooks of the two services on what constitutes prop- er air support. Often this has turned into a competition between the two serv- ices for resources to execute and control close air support operations. Although such differences extend well back to the initial use of the airplane as a military weapon, in this book the author looks at the period 1946- 1973, a period in which technological advances in the form of jet aircraft, weapons, communications, and other electronic equipment played significant roles. Doctrine, too, evolved and this very important subject is discussed in detail. Close air support remains a critical mission today and the lessons of yesterday should not be ignored. This book makes a notable contribution in seeing that it is not ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • What Happened, and What Now?
    BOEING 737 MAX REPORT THE 737]. So they did it, and did not even know what the aircraft was going to be like because they were so focused on the all-new single-aisle.” What happened, Ironically, the A320neo was launched as a defensive move. Airbus leaders wanted to blunt the threat to the A320 from the C Series, the cutting-edge Bombardier aircraft program launched and what now? in 2008 with Pratt & Whitney geared MAXSean Broderick Washington turbofan engines. Even they had no Mid-August marked five months since the last Boeing 737 MAX fleet’s idea the Neo would generate so many revenue flight and customer delivery as well as—most significantly—its new orders. second fatal accident. While Boeing is making progress on changes need- “The Neo’s success in the market- ed to convince regulators that the latest iteration of its venerable narrow- place did point out unmistakably that customers would embrace a lower body is safe to fly, the timing remains fluid. The road ahead is littered with amount of capability quickly,” McNer- unanswered questions. As for how one of the industry’s most successful ney reflected in 2012. “So that was a and best-selling models ended up grounded less than two years after en- factor. We added it all up and decided tering service, more is known. Following is a recap of how the MAX got to move with the MAX.” here, where it is headed, and—to the extent known—what comes next. The birth of the MAX took even its Some key issues related to the MAX crisis are not covered in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Junkers JU-87 Stuka Dive Bomber
    Review of Junkers JU-87 Stuka Dive Bomber Created by Milviz Intro The JU-87 Sturzkampfflugzeug, alias “Stuka” is a Second World War German dive bomber built by Junkers. It features a twin seat tandem configuration where the back seat is a gunners position facing backwards. The D and G-series of JU-87 were both powered by a three-bladed Junkers Jumo 211J liquid-cooled inverted V12 engine powering 1420 PS (1,400hp) and was a notorious and feared aircraft of that era. One of the main characteristics of the Stuka was the inverted gull wings and the dive siren that spread fear in all troops under an attack. The Stuka was designed by Hermann Pohlman and had the first flight back in 1935. It quickly made it to the Luftwaffe’s Condor Legion where it became famous for its accuracy and effectiveness towards ground targets. However the Stuka was not very agile and was therefore very vulnerable in air-to-air combat situations. Several variants were built but this review will focus on the D5 and G2 versions. The D-version is the bomber version whereas the G-version was fitted with two 37mm (1.46in) cannons with armor-piercing tungsten carbide-cored ammunition. General Information & Aircraft Specs Produced by Junkers First Flight 17th of September 1935 Introduction 1936 Role Dive Bomber Status Retired in 1945 Built 6500 (estimated) Designer Hermann Pohlmann Primary User o Germany (The Luftwaffe) o Regia Aeronautica o Royal Romanian Air Force o Bulgarian Air Force Crew: 2 Power Plant: Junkers Jumo 211J Propeller: 3-bladed – 3.4m Wing Span: 13.80 m Wing Area: 31.90 m2 Empty Weight: 2,810 – 3,600 kgs MTOW: 5,100 – 5,720 kgs Max Speed: 344 – 354 km/h Never Exceed 600 km/h Range 1,000 – 1,165 km Armament: o 3x 7.92 machine guns o 4x 100kgs bombs (wing) (D) o 1x 500/1000 kgs bomb (center) (D) o 2x 37mm Flak 18 cannons (G) Purchase, Download & Installation I purchased the JU-87 Stuka through the www.FSPilotShop.com and as always the purchase and download went without any issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the FAA's Review of the Boeing 737
    Summary of the FAA’s Review of the Boeing 737 MAX Summary of the FAA’s Review of the Boeing 737 MAX Return to Service of the Boeing 737 MAX Aircraft Date: November 18, 2020 Summary of the FAA’s Review of the Boeing 737 MAX This page intentionally left blank. 1 Summary of the FAA’s Review of the Boeing 737 MAX Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 5 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 Post-Accident Actions ....................................................................................... 6 Summary of Changes to Aircraft Design and Operation ........................................ 9 Additional Changes Related to the Flight Control Software Update. ...................... 10 Training Enhancements .................................................................................. 11 Compliance Activity ....................................................................................... 12 System Safety Analysis .................................................................................. 13 Return to Service .......................................................................................... 13 Conclusion .................................................................................................... 14 1. Purpose of Final Summary ........................................................................... 15 2. Introduction ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • VA Vol 22 No 11 Nov 1994
    EDITORIAL STAFF Publisher Tom Poberezny Vice-President. Marketing and Communications Dick Matt November 1994 Vol. 22, No. 11 Editor-in-Chief Jack Cox Editor Henry G. Frautschy CONTENTS Managing Editor Golda Cox 1 Straight & Level/ Art Director Espie "Butch" Joyce Mike Drucks Computer Graphic Specialists 2 AIC News/ Sara Hansen Compiled by H.G. Frautschy Olivia L. Phillip Jennifer Larsen Advertising 3 Vintage Literature/Dennis Parks Mary Jones Associate Editor 7 Carburetor Ice/Bill Claxon Norm Petersen Feature Writers 8 AlC Tidbits/H.G. Frautschy Page 13 George Hardie, Jr. Dennis Parks Staff Photographers 10 Members Projects/ Jim Koepnick Mike Steineke Norm Petersen Carl Schuppel Donna Bushman Editorial Assistant 13 The Silver Age Comes Alive in Isabelle Wiske Jack Woodford's Bird Model C/ EAA ANTIQUE/CLASSIC DIVISION , INC, H.G. Frautschy OFFICERS President Vice-President 17 Make Mine Rare ­ Espie 'Butch' Joyce Arfhur Mor(lan The 1929 Wallace Touroplane/ P.O. Box 1001 W211 N11863 Hilltop Dr. Modison, NC 27025 Germantown, WI 53022 H.G. Frautschy 910/573-3843 414/628-2724 Secretory Treasurer 21 Mystery Airplane/ Steve Nesse E.E. 'Buck' Hilbert 2009 Highland Ave. P.O. Box 424 George Hardie Page 17 Albert Lea, MN 56007 Union,IL60180 flJ7/373-1674 815/923-4591 22 American Waco Club F1y-In/ DIRECTORS Roy Redman John Berendt Robert C. 'Bob" Brauer 7645 Echo Point Rd. 9345 S. Hoyne 24 PasS it to Buckl Cannon Falls, MN 55009 Chica~o , IL 60620 flJ7/263-2414 312 79-2105 E.E. "Buck" Hilbert Gene Chose John S. Copeland 2159 Carlton Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing 737 MAX – Still Not Fixed
    Boeing 737 MAX – Still Not Fixed Introduction The world has heard the basic explanation given for why two new 737 MAX airplanes crashed killing 346 people. The Angle of Attack (AOA) Sensor sent faulty data to the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) software, which caused the horizontal stabilizers to repeatedly pitch the airplanes down, overwhelming the pilots causing them to lose control. People that have been following these tragedies a little closer know the original, Boeing-installed AOA Sensor on the Lion Air airplane had been replaced the day before the crash. But there is more to the story. Important facts involving the Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 accident investigations have gone unnoticed leading to many unanswered questions. Several factors appear to have played a direct role in the accidents—specifically, the failure of the AOA Sensors, unexplainable electrical anomalies, and the production of the airplanes—the details of which seem to have been largely ignored. There are at least three other plausible accident scenarios that have not been investigated. Background The Lion Air Final Aircraft Accident Investigation report concluded the replaced AOA Sensor was miscalibrated by 21 degrees and this miscalibration activated MCAS triggering the accident sequence.1 Ethiopia’s Ministry of Transport has not issued their final investigation report or determined the cause of their AOA Sensor failure, although a critical piece of the puzzle seems to exist. Instead they have issued two interim reports and have stated their analysis is still in progress.2 The AOA Sensor is not an algorithm in a piece of software, it is a physical part that weighs approximately three pounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Junkers Ju 87 G-2 494083/8474M
    A/C SERIAL NO.G2 494083 SERIAL 2B INDIVIDUAL HISTORY JUNKERS Ju-87G-2 494083/8474M MUSEUM ACCESSION NUMBER 78/AF/657 Thought to have been built 1943-4 as one of 1,178 Ju87 D-5 ground-attack variants ordered, but later modified to G-2 standard, including fitting underwing mounting points for the two 37mm (1.46inch) Bk37/Flak 18 cannon carried by this variant. The werke number may have been changed from 2883 (D-5) to 494083 when rebuilt as a G-2, of which 210 were produced. (Reference: Aeroplane Monthly July 1976 - `Yesterday's Enemies' No.5, Ju87G). Hards (027926) suggests G-2 outer wings fitted to a D-3 ground attack variant airframe. c. May 45 Captured in Germany, possibly at a factory near the Russian border-Ju 87s remained operational on the Eastern Front until the end of the European war in May 1945. The British Disarmament Wing located 59 Ju-87s at the end of the war. Definitely later at Eggebek airfield, Schleswig-Holstein. Photo: War Prizes (DoRIS Ref.027726) p.151. Coded RI-JK (unidentified unit). This was one of 12 German aircraft selected by the Air Ministry for museum display, rather than as evaluation aircraft, so it did not receive an `Air Min' number. Nine of these museum aircraft still survive. 04 Sep 45 Left Eggebek by surface transport - not flown. Original markings retained for display purposes. Jan 46 Arrived at No.47 MU Sealand (Packing Depot) by this date for storage. 1947/48 Due to shortage of space at Sealand, moved to the German Air Force Equipment Centre located in five hangars at RAF Stanmore Park, Middx, along with other Air Historical Branch Aircraft and administered by No.4MU based at Ruislip from 1 Nov 1949, who provided a detachment of airmen for repairs to cased engines and aircraft.
    [Show full text]