The Giant Cretaceous Coelacanth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The Giant Cretaceous Coelacanth (Actinistia, Sarcopterygii) Megalocoelacanthus dobiei Schwimmer, Stewart & Williams, 1994, and Its Bearing on Latimerioidei Interrelationships Hugo Dutel1,2*, John G. Maisey3, David R. Schwimmer4, Philippe Janvier1, Marc Herbin2, Gae¨l Cle´ment3 1 UMR 7207 CNRS-MNHN, Centre de Recherches sur la Pale´obiodiversite´ et les Pale´oenvironnements (CR2P), De´partement Histoire de la Terre, Muse´um national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France, 2 UMR 7179 CNRS-MNHN, Me´canismes adaptatifs: des Organismes aux Communaute´s, De´partement E´cologie et Gestion de la Biodiversite´, Muse´um national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France, 3 Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, City of New York, New York, United States of America, 4 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Columbus State University, Columbus, Georgia, United States of America Abstract We present a redescription of Megalocoelacanthus dobiei, a giant fossil coelacanth from Upper Cretaceous strata of North America. Megalocoelacanthus has been previously described on the basis of composite material that consisted of isolated elements. Consequently, many aspects of its anatomy have remained unknown as well as its phylogenetic relationships with other coelacanths. Previous studies have suggested that Megalocoelacanthus is closer to Latimeria and Macropoma than to Mawsonia. However, this assumption was based only on the overall similarity of few anatomical features, rather than on a phylogenetic character analysis. A new, and outstandingly preserved specimen from the Niobrara Formation in Kansas allows the detailed description of the skull of Megalocoelacanthus and elucidation of its phylogenetic relationships with other coelacanths. Although strongly flattened, the skull and jaws are well preserved and show many derived features that are shared with Latimeriidae such as Latimeria, Macropoma and Libys. Notably, the parietonasal shield is narrow and flanked by very large, continuous vacuities forming the supraorbital sensory line canal. Such an unusual morphology is also known in Libys. Some other features of Megalocoelacanthus, such as its large size and the absence of teeth are shared with the mawsoniid genera Mawsonia and Axelrodichthys. Our cladistic analysis supports the sister-group relationship of Megalocoelacanthus and Libys within Latimeriidae. This topology suggests that toothless, large-sized coelacanths evolved independently in both Latimeriidae and Mawsoniidae during the Mesozoic. Based on previous topologies and on ours, we then review the high-level taxonomy of Latimerioidei and propose new systematic phylogenetic definitions. Citation: Dutel H, Maisey JG, Schwimmer DR, Janvier P, Herbin M, et al. (2012) The Giant Cretaceous Coelacanth (Actinistia, Sarcopterygii) Megalocoelacanthus dobiei Schwimmer, Stewart & Williams, 1994, and Its Bearing on Latimerioidei Interrelationships. PLoS ONE 7(11): e49911. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049911 Editor: Daphne Soares, University of Maryland, United States of America Received August 7, 2012; Accepted October 15, 2012; Published November 27, 2012 This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. Funding: GC and DS were supported by the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) Axelrod Fund for his visit in the AMNH fossil fish collection to work on the herein described material. This work was partly supported by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche under the TERRES Project (ANR-2010-BLAN-607- 03). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. * E-mail: [email protected] Introduction features evolved independently in Mawsonia and Megalocoelacanthus. The authors have suggested that Megalocoelacanthus is closer to Megalocoelacanthus dobiei Schwimmer, Stewart & Williams, 1994 is Macropoma and Latimeria than to Mawsonia. However, their a giant marine coelacanth discovered in 1987 [1] in the Upper assumption was only based on the comparison of meristic data Cretaceous Bluffown Formation, southeastern USA. With an of some anatomical features (table 2 in [1]), but not on a estimated length of 3.5 m, Megalocoelacanthus is among the largest phylogenetic analysis. known coelacanths. Similar dimensions (i.e. more than 2.0 m in Since its discovery, the relationships of Megalocoelacanthus with total length) are reached by the late Jurassic-mid Cretaceous genus other coelacanths have never been investigated. Here we present a Mawsonia from North Africa and South America [2–7], and the description of cranial and postcranial skeleton of Megalocoelacanthus Early Cretaceous genus Axelrodichthys from Brazil [5] also attained based on new and holotype material. A phylogenetic analysis of 39 a large size. Previous phylogenetic analyses [8–14] supported a taxa and 110 characters is performed to clarify the position of sister-group relationship of Mawsonia and Axelrodichthys within Megalocoelacanthus among coelacanths, and its bearings on Meso- Mawsoniidae Schultze, 1993 [15]. This close affinity between zoic coelacanth’s interrelationships are subsequently discussed. toothless, large-sized Mesozoic coelacanths raised the question Implications for the coelacanth taxonomy will also be discussed whether these features could be synapomorphies of a putative and the application of phylogenetic definitions to coelacanth clade or have evolved independently in several lineages. The taxonomy will be proposed based on our novel topology. evolution of large sized, toothless coelacanths has been briefly discussed by Schwimmer et al. [1] who suggested that these PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 1 November 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 11 | e49911 The Giant Cretaceous Coelacanth Megalocoelacanthus Materials and Methods ethmosphenoid and otoccipital portions), snout, lower jaws, gular plates, branchial arches, urohyal, hyoid skeleton, and shoulder 1. Geological context girdle. Although most of these isolated remains are strongly Megalocoelacanthus remains are known only from the United flattened laterally, they are outstandingly preserved. Significant States. The holotype CCK 88-2-1 consists of cranial and elements from the holotype specimen CCK 88-2-1 are also branchials elements [1], and was found in the lower part of the included in the description for further comments. Blufftown Formation in eastern Alabama, that is early Campanian in age (Figure 1). Remains of Megalocoelacanthus were also first 3. Nomenclatural Acts reported in five additional regional localities from the southeastern The electronic version of this document does not represent a states of Alabama and Georgia [1], along with a single coronoid published work according to the International Code of Zoological fragment from New Jersey. Subsequently, unpublished specimens Nomenclature (ICZN), and hence the nomenclatural acts have been collected in coeval strata in Mississippi (Schwimmer, contained in the electronic version are not available under that Earl Manning, pers. comm.), and Kansas. All known fossils of Code from the electronic edition. Therefore, a separate edition of Megalocoelacanthus with well-known stratigraphic associations are of this document was produced by a method that assures numerous late Santonian to mid-Campanian age [1], except the New Jersey identical and durable copies, and those copies were simultaneously specimen which is in a late Campanian-early Maastrichtian obtainable (from the publication date noted on the first page of this deposit. However, the latter fossil is a highly ablated principal article) for the purpose of providing a public and permanent coronoid fragment, preserved in a near shore lag deposit, which scientific record, in accordance with Article 8.1 of the Code. The may have been reworked from older material: its age is thus separate print-only edition is available on request from PLoS by uncertain. sending a request to PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 1160 Battery Street, Suite 100, San Francisco, CA 94111, USA along 2. Material with a check for $10 (to cover printing and postage) payable to This redescription of Megalocoelacanthus is mainly based on ‘‘Public Library of Science’’. AMNH FF 20267, which was collected in 2007 in the Niobrara In addition, this published work and the nomenclatural acts it Formation, in the Northern Lane County, Kansas (Figure 1). It is contains have been registered in ZooBank, the proposed online early Campanian in age and thus approximately coeval with the registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life holotype CCK 88-2-1. The new specimen consists of skull (both Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information Figure 1. Geological context of Megalocoelacanthus dobiei Schwimmer, Stewart & Williams, 1994. Left, white star indicates the geographic location of the locality of AMNH FF 20267 in the Niobrara chalk of Lane County Kansas, USA (modified from http://www.kgs.ku.edu/ General/Geology/County/klm/lane.html). Right, stratigraphic correlation chart between the principal stratigraphic units from North America (taken from [1]). The Niobrara Formation in Lane County, Kansas, is correlated with the Blufftown, Mooreville, and Eutaw Formations in Alabama and Georgia, where the first
Recommended publications
  • Osteichthyes: Sarcopterygii) Apex Predator from the Eifelian-Aged Dundee Formation of Ontario, Canada

    Osteichthyes: Sarcopterygii) Apex Predator from the Eifelian-Aged Dundee Formation of Ontario, Canada

    Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences A large onychodontiform (Osteichthyes: Sarcopterygii) apex predator from the Eifelian-aged Dundee Formation of Ontario, Canada. Journal: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Manuscript ID cjes-2016-0119.R3 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the Author: 04-Dec-2016 Complete List of Authors: Mann, Arjan; Carleton University, Earth Sciences; University of Toronto Faculty of ArtsDraft and Science, Earth Sciences Rudkin, David; Royal Ontario Museum Evans, David C.; Royal Ontario Museum, Natural History; University of Toronto, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Laflamme, Marc; University of Toronto - Mississauga, Chemical and Physical Sciences Keyword: Sarcopterygii, Onychodontiformes, Body size, Middle Devonian, Eifelian https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Page 1 of 34 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences A large onychodontiform (Osteichthyes: Sarcopterygii) apex predator from the Eifelian- aged Dundee Formation of Ontario, Canada. Arjan Mann 1,2*, David Rudkin 1,2 , David C. Evans 2,3 , and Marc Laflamme 1 1, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, 22 Russell Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3B1, Canada, [email protected], [email protected] 2, Department of Palaeobiology, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen’s Park, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2C6 3, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3B2 *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected] ca). https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 2 of 34 Abstract The Devonian marine strata of southwestern Ontario, Canada have been well documented geologically, but their vertebrate fossils are poorly studied. Here we report a new onychodontiform (Osteichthyes, Sarcopterygii) Onychodus eriensis n.
  • From the Crato Formation (Lower Cretaceous)

    From the Crato Formation (Lower Cretaceous)

    ORYCTOS.Vol. 3 : 3 - 8. Décembre2000 FIRSTRECORD OT CALAMOPLEU RUS (ACTINOPTERYGII:HALECOMORPHI: AMIIDAE) FROMTHE CRATO FORMATION (LOWER CRETACEOUS) OF NORTH-EAST BRAZTL David M. MARTILL' and Paulo M. BRITO'z 'School of Earth, Environmentaland PhysicalSciences, University of Portsmouth,Portsmouth, POl 3QL UK. 2Departmentode Biologia Animal e Vegetal,Universidade do Estadode Rio de Janeiro, rua SâoFrancisco Xavier 524. Rio de Janeiro.Brazll. Abstract : A partial skeleton representsthe first occurrenceof the amiid (Actinopterygii: Halecomorphi: Amiidae) Calamopleurus from the Nova Olinda Member of the Crato Formation (Aptian) of north east Brazil. The new spe- cimen is further evidencethat the Crato Formation ichthyofauna is similar to that of the slightly younger Romualdo Member of the Santana Formation of the same sedimentary basin. The extended temporal range, ?Aptian to ?Cenomanian,for this genus rules out its usefulnessas a biostratigraphic indicator for the Araripe Basin. Key words: Amiidae, Calamopleurus,Early Cretaceous,Brazil Première mention de Calamopleurus (Actinopterygii: Halecomorphi: Amiidae) dans la Formation Crato (Crétacé inférieur), nord est du Brésil Résumé : la première mention dans le Membre Nova Olinda de la Formation Crato (Aptien ; nord-est du Brésil) de I'amiidé (Actinopterygii: Halecomorphi: Amiidae) Calamopleurus est basée sur la découverted'un squelettepar- tiel. Le nouveau spécimen est un élément supplémentaireindiquant que I'ichtyofaune de la Formation Crato est similaire à celle du Membre Romualdo de la Formation Santana, située dans le même bassin sédimentaire. L'extension temporelle de ce genre (?Aptien à ?Cénomanien)ne permet pas de le considérer comme un indicateur biostratigraphiquepour le bassin de l'Araripe. Mots clés : Amiidae, Calamopleurus, Crétacé inférieu4 Brésil INTRODUCTION Araripina and at Mina Pedra Branca, near Nova Olinda where cf.
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17944-8 — Evolution And

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17944-8 — Evolution And

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17944-8 — Evolution and Development of Fishes Edited by Zerina Johanson , Charlie Underwood , Martha Richter Index More Information Index abaxial muscle,33 Alizarin red, 110 arandaspids, 5, 61–62 abdominal muscles, 212 Alizarin red S whole mount staining, 127 Arandaspis, 5, 61, 69, 147 ability to repair fractures, 129 Allenypterus, 253 arcocentra, 192 Acanthodes, 14, 79, 83, 89–90, 104, 105–107, allometric growth, 129 Arctic char, 130 123, 152, 152, 156, 213, 221, 226 alveolar bone, 134 arcualia, 4, 49, 115, 146, 191, 206 Acanthodians, 3, 7, 13–15, 18, 23, 29, 63–65, Alx, 36, 47 areolar calcification, 114 68–69, 75, 79, 82, 84, 87–89, 91, 99, 102, Amdeh Formation, 61 areolar cartilage, 192 104–106, 114, 123, 148–149, 152–153, ameloblasts, 134 areolar mineralisation, 113 156, 160, 189, 192, 195, 198–199, 207, Amia, 154, 185, 190, 193, 258 Areyongalepis,7,64–65 213, 217–218, 220 ammocoete, 30, 40, 51, 56–57, 176, 206, 208, Argentina, 60–61, 67 Acanthodiformes, 14, 68 218 armoured agnathans, 150 Acanthodii, 152 amphiaspids, 5, 27 Arthrodira, 12, 24, 26, 28, 74, 82–84, 86, 194, Acanthomorpha, 20 amphibians, 1, 20, 150, 172, 180–182, 245, 248, 209, 222 Acanthostega, 22, 155–156, 255–258, 260 255–256 arthrodires, 7, 11–13, 22, 28, 71–72, 74–75, Acanthothoraci, 24, 74, 83 amphioxus, 49, 54–55, 124, 145, 155, 157, 159, 80–84, 152, 192, 207, 209, 212–213, 215, Acanthothoracida, 11 206, 224, 243–244, 249–250 219–220 acanthothoracids, 7, 12, 74, 81–82, 211, 215, Amphioxus, 120 Ascl,36 219 Amphystylic, 148 Asiaceratodus,21
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History

    Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History

    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
  • Geological Survey of Ohio

    Geological Survey of Ohio

    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF OHIO. VOL. I.—PART II. PALÆONTOLOGY. SECTION II. DESCRIPTIONS OF FOSSIL FISHES. BY J. S. NEWBERRY. Digital version copyrighted ©2012 by Don Chesnut. THE CLASSIFICATION AND GEOLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION OF OUR FOSSIL FISHES. So little is generally known in regard to American fossil fishes, that I have thought the notes which I now give upon some of them would be more interesting and intelligible if those into whose hands they will fall could have a more comprehensive view of this branch of palæontology than they afford. I shall therefore preface the descriptions which follow with a few words on the geological distribution of our Palæozoic fishes, and on the relations which they sustain to fossil forms found in other countries, and to living fishes. This seems the more necessary, as no summary of what is known of our fossil fishes has ever been given, and the literature of the subject is so scattered through scientific journals and the proceedings of learned societies, as to be practically inaccessible to most of those who will be readers of this report. I. THE ZOOLOGICAL RELATIONS OF OUR FOSSIL FISHES. To the common observer, the class of Fishes seems to be well defined and quite distin ct from all the other groups o f vertebrate animals; but the comparative anatomist finds in certain unusual and aberrant forms peculiarities of structure which link the Fishes to the Invertebrates below and Amphibians above, in such a way as to render it difficult, if not impossible, to draw the lines sharply between these great groups.
  • Marine Early Triassic Osteichthyes from Spiti, Indian Himalayas

    Marine Early Triassic Osteichthyes from Spiti, Indian Himalayas

    Swiss J Palaeontol (2016) 135:275–294 DOI 10.1007/s13358-015-0098-6 Marine Early Triassic Osteichthyes from Spiti, Indian Himalayas 1 1 1 1 Carlo Romano • David Ware • Thomas Bru¨hwiler • Hugo Bucher • Winand Brinkmann1 Received: 12 March 2015 / Accepted: 11 August 2015 / Published online: 28 September 2015 Ó Akademie der Naturwissenschaften Schweiz (SCNAT) 2015 Abstract A new, marine osteichthyan (bony fish) fauna strata of other localities. The study of Early Triassic fish from the Early Triassic of northern India is presented. The assemblages, including the presented one, is fundamental material was collected in situ at localities within Pin Valley for our understanding of the great osteichthyan diversifi- (Lahaul and Spiti District, Himachal Pradesh, India) and is cation after the Late Permian mass extinction event. dated as middle-late Dienerian (one specimen possibly earliest Smithian). The new ichthyofauna includes a lower Keywords Neotethys Á Northern Indian Margin Á jaw of the predatory basal ray-finned fish Saurichthys,a Gondwana Á Anoxia Á Biotic recovery Á Urohyal nearly complete specimen of a parasemionotid neoptery- gian (cf. Watsonulus cf. eugnathoides), as well as further Abbreviations articulated and disarticulated remains (Actinopterygii CMNFV Canadian Museum of Nature (Fossil indet., Actinistia indet.), and thus comprises the most Vertebrate), Ottawa, Canada complete Triassic fish fossils known from the Indian sub- MNHN.F Muse´um National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, continent. Saurichthys is known from many Triassic France localities and reached a global distribution rapidly after the PIMUZ Pala¨ontologisches Institut und Museum, Late Permian mass extinction event. Parasemionotidae, a Universita¨tZu¨rich, Zu¨rich, Schweiz species-rich family restricted to the Early Triassic, also achieved widespread distribution during this epoch.
  • A New Species of Coloborhynchus (Pterosauria, Ornithocheiridae) from the Mid- Cretaceous of North Africa

    A New Species of Coloborhynchus (Pterosauria, Ornithocheiridae) from the Mid- Cretaceous of North Africa

    Accepted Manuscript A new species of Coloborhynchus (Pterosauria, Ornithocheiridae) from the mid- Cretaceous of North Africa Megan L. Jacobs, David M. Martill, Nizar Ibrahim, Nick Longrich PII: S0195-6671(18)30354-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2018.10.018 Reference: YCRES 3995 To appear in: Cretaceous Research Received Date: 28 August 2018 Revised Date: 18 October 2018 Accepted Date: 21 October 2018 Please cite this article as: Jacobs, M.L., Martill, D.M., Ibrahim, N., Longrich, N., A new species of Coloborhynchus (Pterosauria, Ornithocheiridae) from the mid-Cretaceous of North Africa, Cretaceous Research (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2018.10.018. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 A new species of Coloborhynchus (Pterosauria, Ornithocheiridae) 2 from the mid-Cretaceous of North Africa 3 Megan L. Jacobs a* , David M. Martill a, Nizar Ibrahim a** , Nick Longrich b 4 a School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3QL, UK 5 b Department of Biology and Biochemistry and Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath 6 BA2 7AY, UK 7 *Corresponding author. Email address : [email protected] (M.L.
  • Hans-Peter Schultze, a Great Paleoichthyologist for Whom Work Is Synonymous with Enjoyment

    Hans-Peter Schultze, a Great Paleoichthyologist for Whom Work Is Synonymous with Enjoyment

    Mitt. Mus. Nat.kd. Berl., Geowiss. Reihe 5 (2002) 5-17 10.11.2002 Hans-Peter Schultze, a great paleoichthyologist for whom work is synonymous with enjoyment Richard Cloutierl With 4 figures and 2 tables In the summer of 1982, Hans-Peter Schultze and above all by his simplicity and friendliness. Two Gloria Arratia were invited to a small museum years later I started my PbD. at The University located on a fossiliferous site of the Devonian of Kansas, under the supervision of Hans-Peter. Escuminac Formation in Miguasha, Quebec, Compared to his long career, these two weeks eastern Canada. Hans-Peter was to work with that Hans-Peter spent in Miguasha represent an Marius Arsenault, the director of the Miguasha extremely short period of time. Some might say Museum, on the skull of the elpistostegalid EZ- that this little anecdote is insignificant when in- pistostege watsoni, a species closely related to ba- troducing a vertebrate paleontologist (Fig. ZA) sal tetrapods. In addition, he went through the who published 132 papers and books (a total of collections to describe and measure numerous 2977 published pages) in addition to more than juvenile specimens of the osteolepiform Eusthe- 80 abstracts, book reviews and obituaries. How- nopteron foordi. As expected, these two projects ever, this brief story is representative of Hans- turned out to be important contributions in low- Peter’s personality and contributions. He is a er vertebrate paleontology and systematics: one great scientist with numerous interests in science, on the origin of tetrapods (1985), and the second art, and history. Hans-Peter enjoys digging for one on growth patterns of a Late Devonian fish fossils, looking at fossils and describing fossils, (1984).
  • Giant Fossil Coelacanths from the Late Cretaceous of the Eastern

    Giant Fossil Coelacanths from the Late Cretaceous of the Eastern

    ^rfij^i^v^^™, - » v ' - - 4 j/ N ^P"" ,- V ^™ V- -*^ >•;:-* ' ^ * -r;' David R. Schwimmer, Geologist, Columbus State University Introduction In Autumn, 1987, a sizeable mass of fossil bone was discovered by amateur collectors in the bed of a small creek in eastern Alabama. The bone-bearing rock, some 300 kg in weight, was collected by a party led by G. Dent Williams and transferred to the paleontology laboratory at Columbus State University. Williams prepared most of the material using air percussion tools, and I further cleared some bones with acetic acid. A mandible (lower jaw bone) of 502 mm length was the first bone prepared from the material. It strangely lacked evidence of both teeth and tooth sockets, and it was covered medially with coarse denticulation resembling #40 grit sandpaper. The jawbone conformed with no recognizable North American Late Cretaceous fish or four-legged animal, and, given the large size of the mandible, my initial search for an identification ranged from ankylosaurid dinosaurs, to mosasaurs, to the larger contemporary fish, such as Xiphactinus. Nothing known in the Late Cretaceous of North America matched the mandible nor any other bone which was subsequently prepared from this matrix. J.D. Stewart of the L.A. County Museum was prior fossil record of a North American coelacanth is concurrently studying fossils of small marine Diplurus newarki, from freshwater deposits of earliest coelacanths from the Late Cretaceous of western Kansas, Jurassic age (ca. 205 Myr.: Schaeffer, 1941, 1952). USA (which were also a new discovery at the time: see Forey (1981) and Maisey (1991) recognized two sub- Stewart et al., 1991).
  • I Ecomorphological Change in Lobe-Finned Fishes (Sarcopterygii

    I Ecomorphological Change in Lobe-Finned Fishes (Sarcopterygii

    Ecomorphological change in lobe-finned fishes (Sarcopterygii): disparity and rates by Bryan H. Juarez A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in the University of Michigan 2015 Master’s Thesis Committee: Assistant Professor Lauren C. Sallan, University of Pennsylvania, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Daniel L. Rabosky, Co-Chair Associate Research Scientist Miriam L. Zelditch i © Bryan H. Juarez 2015 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the Rabosky Lab, David W. Bapst, Graeme T. Lloyd and Zerina Johanson for helpful discussions on methodology, Lauren C. Sallan, Miriam L. Zelditch and Daniel L. Rabosky for their dedicated guidance on this study and the London Natural History Museum for courteously providing me with access to specimens. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF APPENDICES v ABSTRACT vi SECTION I. Introduction 1 II. Methods 4 III. Results 9 IV. Discussion 16 V. Conclusion 20 VI. Future Directions 21 APPENDICES 23 REFERENCES 62 iv LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLE/FIGURE II. Cranial PC-reduced data 6 II. Post-cranial PC-reduced data 6 III. PC1 and PC2 Cranial and Post-cranial Morphospaces 11-12 III. Cranial Disparity Through Time 13 III. Post-cranial Disparity Through Time 14 III. Cranial/Post-cranial Disparity Through Time 15 v LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Aquatic and Semi-aquatic Lobe-fins 24 B. Species Used In Analysis 34 C. Cranial and Post-Cranial Landmarks 37 D. PC3 and PC4 Cranial and Post-cranial Morphospaces 38 E. PC1 PC2 Cranial Morphospaces 39 1-2.
  • Giant Mesozoic Coelacanths (Osteichthyes, Actinistia) Reveal High Body Size Disparity Decoupled from Taxic Diversity

    Giant Mesozoic Coelacanths (Osteichthyes, Actinistia) Reveal High Body Size Disparity Decoupled from Taxic Diversity

    Giant Mesozoic Coelacanths (Osteichthyes, Actinistia) Reveal High Body Size Disparity Decoupled From Taxic Diversity Lionel Cavin ( [email protected] ) Natural History Museum of Geneva André Piuz Natural History Museum of Geneva Christophe Ferrante Natural History Museum of Geneva Guillaume Guinot Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier Research Article Keywords: morphological evolution, taxic diversication, Genomic and physiological characteristics Posted Date: March 2nd, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-245480/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License 1 2 Giant Mesozoic coelacanths (Osteichthyes, Actinistia) reveal high 3 body size disparity decoupled from taxic diversity 4 5 Lionel Cavin1*, André Piuz1, Christophe Ferrante1,2 & Guillaume Guinot3 6 7 8 1 Department of Geology and Palaeontology, Natural History Museum of Geneva, Geneva, 9 Switzerland 10 2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Geneva, Rue des Maraîchais 13, 1205 Genève, 11 Switzerland 12 3 Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de Montpellier (Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, 13 EPHE), Montpellier, France 14 15 * Corresponding author 16 Email: [email protected] 17 1 18 Abstract 19 20 The positive correlation between speciation rates and morphological evolution expressed by 21 body size is a macroevolutionary trait of vertebrates. Although taxic diversification and 22 morphological evolution are slow in coelacanths, their fossil record indicates that large and 23 small species coexisted, which calls into question the link between morphological and body 24 size disparities. Here, we describe and reassess fossils of giant coelacanths. Two genera 25 reached up to 5 meters long, placing them among the ten largest bony fish that ever lived.
  • A Hiatus Obscures the Early Evolution of Modern Lineages of Bony Fishes

    A Hiatus Obscures the Early Evolution of Modern Lineages of Bony Fishes

    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2021 A Hiatus Obscures the Early Evolution of Modern Lineages of Bony Fishes Romano, Carlo Abstract: About half of all vertebrate species today are ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii), and nearly all of them belong to the Neopterygii (modern ray-fins). The oldest unequivocal neopterygian fossils are known from the Early Triassic. They appear during a time when global fish faunas consisted of mostly cosmopolitan taxa, and contemporary bony fishes belonged mainly to non-neopterygian (“pale- opterygian”) lineages. In the Middle Triassic (Pelsonian substage and later), less than 10 myrs (million years) after the Permian-Triassic boundary mass extinction event (PTBME), neopterygians were already species-rich and trophically diverse, and bony fish faunas were more regionally differentiated compared to the Early Triassic. Still little is known about the early evolution of neopterygians leading up to this first diversity peak. A major factor limiting our understanding of this “Triassic revolution” isaninter- val marked by a very poor fossil record, overlapping with the Spathian (late Olenekian, Early Triassic), Aegean (Early Anisian, Middle Triassic), and Bithynian (early Middle Anisian) substages. Here, I review the fossil record of Early and Middle Triassic marine bony fishes (Actinistia and Actinopterygii) at the substage-level in order to evaluate the impact of this hiatus–named herein the Spathian–Bithynian gap (SBG)–on our understanding of their diversification after the largest mass extinction event of the past. I propose three hypotheses: 1) the SSBE hypothesis, suggesting that most of the Middle Triassic diver- sity appeared in the aftermath of the Smithian-Spathian boundary extinction (SSBE; ฀2 myrs after the PTBME), 2) the Pelsonian explosion hypothesis, which states that most of the Middle Triassic ichthyo- diversity is the result of a radiation event in the Pelsonian, and 3) the gradual replacement hypothesis, i.e.