DOCSLIB.ORG

Report About Fish Bacterial Diseases

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report About Fish Bacterial Diseases Report about fish bacterial diseases Toranzo A.E. in Alvarez-Pellitero P. (ed.), Barja J.L. (ed.), Basurco B. (ed.), Berthe F. (ed.), Toranzo A.E. (ed.). Mediterranean aquaculture diagnostic laboratories Zaragoza : CIHEAM Options Méditerranéennes : Série B. Etudes et Recherches; n. 49 2004 pages 49-89 Article available on line / Article disponible en ligne à l’adresse : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?IDPDF=4600220 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To cite this article / Pour citer cet article -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Toranzo A.E. Report about fish bacterial diseases. In : Alvarez-Pellitero P. (ed.), Barja J.L. (ed.), Basurco B. (ed.), Berthe F. (ed.), Toranzo A.E. (ed.). Mediterranean aquaculture diagnostic laboratories. Zaragoza : CIHEAM, 2004. p. 49-89 (Options Méditerranéennes : Série B. Etudes et Recherches; n. 49) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.ciheam.org/ http://om.ciheam.org/ Report about fish bacterial diseases A.E. Toranzo University of Santiago de Compostela, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Aquaculture Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Campus Sur 15872 Santiago de Compostela, Spain About diagnostic laboratories for bacterial fish diseases Almost all laboratories participating in the survey (51 out 54) from 14 different countries stated that they performed bacteriological studies. Most reports about bacterial diseases, as has been seen for virus, come from finfish species produced intensively in Mediterranean countries, both from marine species (seabass, seabream and turbot, that represent about 22% of fish production) and from freshwater (trout, that represent 29% of the total fish production). Very scarce information was obtained on the diseases occurring in the main fish species produced in extensive and semi-intensive systems, i.e. tilapia, carp and mullet, that represent about 50% of the fish production in the region. It is here pointed out that only 1 laboratory from Egypt has participated in the survey. As for all diseases or pathogens stated in the survey, the significance of a disease in a particular country can be overestimated by the high number of laboratories involved in fish diagnosis in the same country. Discrepancies are noted between the diagnostic methods implemented in the surveillance efforts and the techniques available in the laboratories involved in the survey. Although some of the commercial serological kits employed in the survey are appropriate for a rapid confirmative diagnosis of the diseases, they do not allow the serotypes to be distinguished. Therefore, the kits are not valid for epidemiological purposes. Very scarce information is provided about the prevention measures implemented in the Mediterranean region and the efficacy of vaccination programmes. In fact, practically no data is available if the cases of mortality reported are from vaccinated or unvaccinated fish. In the case of detection of diseases in several fish species, most of the laboratories report global data which makes it difficult to determine the incidence of the disease in a particular species. Main reported diseases A total of 15 bacterial diseases are reported to be present in the area for the years 1998, 1999 and 2000 (Fig. 1). The main diseases covered by the different laboratories (with reports from 6 or more countries and 14 or more laboratories) are vibriosis, pasteurellosis, enteric red mouth (ERM) disease, furunculosis and marine flexibacteriosis. As for vibriosis and pasteurellosis, in general, the highest incidence occurs in larval and juvenile stages of marine species, mainly seabass and seabream. ERM is stated as the most reported disease in trout farming in Mediterranean countries. The typical furuncolosis is described in both fresh water fish (mainly cultured salmonids) and marine fish (mainly seabass, seabream and turbot). Marine flexibacteriosis is described in eleven marine fish species. Other significant diseases, with lower reports are rainbow trout fry syndrome (RTFS), columnaris disease, motile Aeromonas septicemia, pseudomoniasis, streptococcocis, mycobacteriosis, epitheliocystis, and rainbow trout gastrointestinal syndrome (RTGS) 49 The less stated bacterial diseases in the survey are bacterial kidney disease (BKD), piscirickettsiosis, being reported in just 2 and 1 countries, respectively. It is pointed out that within the OIE list of notifiable fish diseases there are no bacterial diseases. As for the OIE list of other significant diseases, only the presence of BKD and piscirickettsiosis was included. The other two diseases, ERM and furunculosis, are included in list III of the EU regulation. 40 35 30 25 No. Countries 20 No. Laboratories 15 10 5 0 BKD ERM RTFS RTGS Motile Vibriosis disease Columnaris Marine Aeromonas Forunculosis Pasteurellosis Epitheliocystis Flexibacteriosis Streptococcosis Mycobacteriosis Pseudomoniasis Piscirickettsiosis Fig. 1. Summary of reported bacterial diseases. General references about fish bacterial diseases Ariel, E. and Olesen, N.J. (2002). Finfish in aquaculture and their diseases – A retrospective view on the European Community. Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 22(2): 72-85. Baptista, T., Costa, J. and Soares, F. (1999). Patologías más comunes en Dorada (Sparus aurata) y Lubina (Dicentrarchus labrax) registradas en las piscifactoría al sur del Río Tajo. Revista Aquatic, No. 7. Available at: http://www.revistaaquatic.com Council of the European Communities (1991). Council Directive 91/67/EEC of 28 January of 1991 concerning the animal health conditions governing the placing on the market of aquaculture animals and products. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/fisheries/doc_et_publ/factsheets/legal_texts/aqua/aquaculture/animal _disease_en.html Council of the European Communities (1993). Council Directive 93/53/EEC of 24 June 1993 introducing minimum Community measures for the control of certain fish diseases. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/fisheries/doc_et_publ/factsheets/legal_texts/aqua/aquaculture/animal _disease_en.html Le Breton, A.D. (1999). Mediterranean finfish pathologies: Present status and new developments in prophylactic methods. Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 19(6): 250-253. Newman, S.G. (1993). Bacterial vaccines of fish. Ann. Rev. Fish Dis., 3: 145-186. Office International des Epizooties (OIE) (2000). Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Aquatic Animals, 3rd edn. OIE, Paris. Available at: http://www.oie.int Office International des Epizooties (OIE) (2002). Aquatic Animal Health Code, 5th edn. OIE, Paris. Available at: http://www.oie.int Osorio, C. and Toranzo, A.E. (2002). DNA-based diagnostics in sea farming. In: Recent Advances in Marine Biotechnology Series, Vol. 7, Seafood Safety and Human Health, Fingerman, M. and Nagabhushanam, R. (eds). Science Publishers, Inc., Plymouth, UK, pp. 253-310. Rodgers, C.J. and Furones, M.D. (1998). Disease problems in cultured marine fish in the Mediterranean. Fish Pathol., 33(4): 157-164. Romalde, J.L. and Magariños, B. (1997). Immunization with bacterial antigens: Pasteurellosis. In: Fish 50 Vaccinology, Gudding, R., Lillehaug, A., Midtlyng, P.J. and Brown, F. (eds). Developments in Biologicals, Vol. 90. Karger, Basel, pp. 167-177. Romalde, J.L., Magariños, B., Fouz, B., Bandí, I., Nuñez, N.S. and Toranzo, A.E. (1995). Evaluation of Bionor mono-kits for rapid detection of bacterial fish pathogens. Dis. Aquat. Org., 21: 25-34. Romalde, J.L. and Toranzo, A.E. (2002). Molecular approaches for the study and diagnosis of salmonid streptococcosis. In: Molecular Diagnosis of Salmonid Diseases, Cunningham, C.O. (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publ., The Netherlands, pp. 211-223. Sousa, J.A., Romalde, J.L., Ledo, A., Eiras, J.C., Barja, J.L. and Toranzo, A.E. (1996). Health status of salmonid aquaculture in North Portugal. Characterization of the pathogens causing notifiable diseases. J. Fish Dis., 19: 83-89. Toranzo, A.E. and Barja, J.L. (1990). A review of the taxonomy and seroepizootiology of Vibrio anguillarum, with special reference to aquaculture in the northwest of Spain. Dis. Aquat. Org., 9: 73-82. Toranzo, A.E., Dopazo, C.P., Romalde, J.L., Santos, Y. and Barja, J.L. (1997). Estado actual de la patología bacteriana y vírica en la piscicultura española. Revista Aquatic, No. 1. Available at: http://www.revistaaquatic.com Toranzo, A.E., Romalde, J.L., Dopazo, C.P., Magariños, B. and Barja, J.L. (2003). Trends of the pathologies affecting the main marine fish cultured in Spain. A twenty-year study. World Aquaculture (in press). Toranzo, A.E., Santos, Y. and Barja, J.L. (1997). Immunization with bacterial antigens: Vibrio infections. In: Fish Vaccinology, Gudding, R., Lillehaug, A., Midtlyng, P.J. and Brown, F. (eds). Developments in Biologicals, Vol. 90. Karger, Basel, pp. 93-105. Vibriosis Within the genus Vibrio, the species causing the most economically serious diseases in marine culture are Vibrio anguillarum, V. ordalii, V. vulnificus biotype 2 and V. salmonicida. However, vibriosis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011
    SGR 129 Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY AND APPLIED NUTRITION OFFICE OF FOOD SAFETY Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – April 2011 Additional copies may be purchased from: Florida Sea Grant IFAS - Extension Bookstore University of Florida P.O. Box 110011 Gainesville, FL 32611-0011 (800) 226-1764 Or www.ifasbooks.com Or you may download a copy from: http://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances You may submit electronic or written comments regarding this guidance at any time. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations. gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (240) 402-2300 April 2011 Table of Contents: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance • Guidance for the Industry: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance ................................ 1 • CHAPTER 1: General Information .......................................................................................................19 • CHAPTER 2: Conducting a Hazard Analysis and Developing a HACCP Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Working Group Report on Salmon Disease
    Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Working Group Report on Salmon Disease Larry Hammell - Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada Craig Stephen- Centre for Coastal Health, University of Calgary, Canada Ian Bricknell- School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, USA Øystein Evensen- Norwegian School of Veterinary Medicine, Oslo, Norway Patricio Bustos- ADL Diagnostic Chile Ltda., Chile With Contributions by: Ricardo Enriquez- University of Austral, Chile 1 Citation: Hammell, L., Stephen, C., Bricknell, I., Evensen Ø., and P. Bustos. 2009 “Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Working Group Report on Salmon Disease” commissioned by the Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue, available at http://wwf.worldwildlife.org/site/PageNavigator/SalmonSOIForm Corresponding author: Larry Hammell, email: [email protected] This report was commissioned by the Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue. The Salmon Dialogue is a multi-stakeholder, multi-national group which was initiated by the World Wildlife Fund in 2004. Participants include salmon producers and other members of the market chain, NGOs, researchers, retailers, and government officials from major salmon producing and consuming countries. The goal of the Dialogue is to credibly develop and support the implementation of measurable, performance-based standards that minimize or eliminate the key negative environmental and social impacts of salmon farming, while permitting the industry to remain economically viable The Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue focuses their research and standard development on seven key areas of impact of salmon production including: social; feed; disease; salmon escapes; chemical inputs; benthic impacts and siting; and, nutrient loading and carrying capacity. Funding for this report and other Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue supported work is provided by the members of the Dialogue‘s steering committee and their donors.
    [Show full text]
  • Proteome Analysis Reveals a Role of Rainbow Trout Lymphoid Organs During Yersinia Ruckeri Infection Process
    www.nature.com/scientificreports Correction: Author Correction OPEN Proteome analysis reveals a role of rainbow trout lymphoid organs during Yersinia ruckeri infection Received: 14 February 2018 Accepted: 30 August 2018 process Published online: 18 September 2018 Gokhlesh Kumar 1, Karin Hummel2, Katharina Noebauer2, Timothy J. Welch3, Ebrahim Razzazi-Fazeli2 & Mansour El-Matbouli1 Yersinia ruckeri is the causative agent of enteric redmouth disease in salmonids. Head kidney and spleen are major lymphoid organs of the teleost fsh where antigen presentation and immune defense against microbes take place. We investigated proteome alteration in head kidney and spleen of the rainbow trout following Y. ruckeri strains infection. Organs were analyzed after 3, 9 and 28 days post exposure with a shotgun proteomic approach. GO annotation and protein-protein interaction were predicted using bioinformatic tools. Thirty four proteins from head kidney and 85 proteins from spleen were found to be diferentially expressed in rainbow trout during the Y. ruckeri infection process. These included lysosomal, antioxidant, metalloproteinase, cytoskeleton, tetraspanin, cathepsin B and c-type lectin receptor proteins. The fndings of this study regarding the immune response at the protein level ofer new insight into the systemic response to Y. ruckeri infection in rainbow trout. This proteomic data facilitate a better understanding of host-pathogen interactions and response of fsh against Y. ruckeri biotype 1 and 2 strains. Protein-protein interaction analysis predicts carbon metabolism, ribosome and phagosome pathways in spleen of infected fsh, which might be useful in understanding biological processes and further studies in the direction of pathways. Enteric redmouth disease (ERM) causes signifcant economic losses in salmonids worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Health Quick Guide
    Fish Health Quick Guide Table of contents 1 Fish health ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Category 2 (Notifiable) ...................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Cestodes (Tape worms) ................................................................................................................ 1 2.2 Nematodes (Round worms) .......................................................................................................... 1 2.3 Ergasilus briani .............................................................................................................................. 1 2.4 Ergasilus sieboldi (Gill maggot) .................................................................................................... 2 2.5 Thorny headed worm (Acanthocephalans) ................................................................................... 2 2.6 Gyrodactylus .................................................................................................................................. 2 3 Common FW external Parasites. ...................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Costia (Icthyobodo necatrix). ........................................................................................................ 3 3.2 Trichodina. ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Detection and Identification of Fish Pathogens: What Is the Future?
    The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh 60(4), 2008, 213-229. 213 Detection and Identification of Fish Pathogens: What is the Future? A Review I. Frans1,2†, B. Lievens1,2*†, C. Heusdens1,2 and K.A. Willems1,2 1 Scientia Terrae Research Institute, B-2860 Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium 2 Research Group Process Microbial Ecology and Management, Department Microbial and Molecular Systems, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Association, De Nayer Campus, B-2860 Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium, and Leuven Food Science and Nutrition Research Centre (LfoRCe), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3001 Heverlee-Leuven, Belgium (Received 1.8.08, Accepted 20.8.08) Key words: biosecurity, diagnosis, DNA array, multiplexing, real-time PCR Abstract Fish diseases pose a universal threat to the ornamental fish industry, aquaculture, and public health. They can be caused by many organisms, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa. The lack of rapid, accurate, and reliable means of detecting and identifying fish pathogens is one of the main limitations in fish pathogen diagnosis and disease management and has triggered the search for alternative diagnostic techniques. In this regard, the advent of molecular biology, especially polymerase chain reaction (PCR), provides alternative means for detecting and iden- tifying fish pathogens. Many techniques have been developed, each requiring its own protocol, equipment, and expertise. A major challenge at the moment is the development of multiplex assays that allow accurate detection, identification, and quantification of multiple pathogens in a single assay, even if they belong to different superkingdoms. In this review, recent advances in molecular fish pathogen diagnosis are discussed with an emphasis on nucleic acid-based detec- tion and identification techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • BMC Veterinary Research Biomed Central
    BMC Veterinary Research BioMed Central Methodology article Open Access Loop-mediated isothermal amplification as an emerging technology for detection of Yersinia ruckeri the causative agent of enteric red mouth disease in fish Mona Saleh1, Hatem Soliman1,2 and Mansour El-Matbouli*1 Address: 1Clinic for Fish and Reptiles, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Munich, Germany, Kaulbachstr.37, 80539 Munich, Germany and 2Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute, El-Sekka El-Beda St., P.O. Box 131, Abbasia, Cairo, Egypt Email: Mona Saleh - [email protected]; Hatem Soliman - [email protected]; Mansour El-Matbouli* - El- [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 12 August 2008 Received: 29 May 2008 Accepted: 12 August 2008 BMC Veterinary Research 2008, 4:31 doi:10.1186/1746-6148-4-31 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/4/31 © 2008 Saleh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Enteric Redmouth (ERM) disease also known as Yersiniosis is a contagious disease affecting salmonids, mainly rainbow trout. The causative agent is the gram-negative bacterium Yersinia ruckeri. The disease can be diagnosed by isolation and identification of the causative agent, or detection of the Pathogen using fluorescent antibody tests, ELISA and PCR assays. These diagnostic methods are laborious, time consuming and need well trained personnel. Results: A loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay was developed and evaluated for detection of Y.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis Virus Arun K
    1 Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis Virus ARUN K. DHAR,1,2* SCOTT LAPATRA,3 ANDREW ORRY4 AND F.C. THOMas ALLNUTT1 1BrioBiotech LLC, Glenelg, Maryland, USA; 2Aquaculture Pathology Laboratory, School of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA; 3Clear Springs Foods, Buhl, Idaho, USA; 4Molsoft, San Diego, California, USA 1.1 Introduction and as a genome-linked protein, VPg, via guany- lylation of VP1 (Fig. 1.1 and Table 1.1). Infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV), the aetio- Aquabirnaviruses have broad host ranges and logical agent of infectious pancreatic necrosis (IPN), differ in their optimal replication temperatures. is a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) virus in the fam- They consist of four serogroups A, B, C and D ily Birnaviridae (Leong et al., 2000; ICTV, 2014). (Dixon et al., 2008), but most belong to serogroup The four genera in this family include Aquabirnavirus, A, which is divided into serotypes A1–A9.The A1 Avibirnavirus, Blosnavirus and Entomobirnavirus serotype contains most of the US isolates (reference (Delmas et al., 2005), and they infect vertebrates and strain West Buxton), serotypes A2–A5 are primar- invertebrates. Aquabirnavirus infects aquatic species ily European isolates (reference strains, Ab and (fish, molluscs and crustaceans) and has three spe- Hecht) and serotypes A6–A9 include isolates from cies: IPNV, Yellowtail ascites virus and Tellina virus. Canada (reference strains C1, C2, C3 and Jasper). IPNV, which infects salmonids, is the type species. The IPNV genome consists of two dsRNAs, segments A and B (Fig. 1.1; Leong et al., 2000). Segment A 1.1.1 IPNV morphogenesis has ~ 3100 bp and contains two partially overlap- ping open reading frames (ORFs).
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Fish Vaccine Development Strategies: Conventional Methods and Modern Biotechnological Approaches
    microorganisms Review A Review of Fish Vaccine Development Strategies: Conventional Methods and Modern Biotechnological Approaches Jie Ma 1,2 , Timothy J. Bruce 1,2 , Evan M. Jones 1,2 and Kenneth D. Cain 1,2,* 1 Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA; [email protected] (J.M.); [email protected] (T.J.B.); [email protected] (E.M.J.) 2 Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 25 October 2019; Accepted: 14 November 2019; Published: 16 November 2019 Abstract: Fish immunization has been carried out for over 50 years and is generally accepted as an effective method for preventing a wide range of bacterial and viral diseases. Vaccination efforts contribute to environmental, social, and economic sustainability in global aquaculture. Most licensed fish vaccines have traditionally been inactivated microorganisms that were formulated with adjuvants and delivered through immersion or injection routes. Live vaccines are more efficacious, as they mimic natural pathogen infection and generate a strong antibody response, thus having a greater potential to be administered via oral or immersion routes. Modern vaccine technology has targeted specific pathogen components, and vaccines developed using such approaches may include subunit, or recombinant, DNA/RNA particle vaccines. These advanced technologies have been developed globally and appear to induce greater levels of immunity than traditional fish vaccines. Advanced technologies have shown great promise for the future of aquaculture vaccines and will provide health benefits and enhanced economic potential for producers. This review describes the use of conventional aquaculture vaccines and provides an overview of current molecular approaches and strategies that are promising for new aquaculture vaccine development.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Pathology Section Laboratory Manual
    FISH PATHOLOGY SECTION LABORATORY MANUAL Edited by Theodore R. Meyers, Ph.D. Special Publication No. 12 2nd Edition Alaska Department of Fish and Game Commercial Fisheries Division P.O. Box 25526 Juneau, Alaska 99802-5526 January 2000 Rev. 03/98 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .............................................................................................................................v CHAPTER/TITLE Page .................................................................................................................... 1. Sample Collection and Submission.............................................................................1-1 to 1-8 I. Finfish Diagnostics....................................................................................................... 1-1 II. Finfish Bacteriology ..................................................................................................... 1-2 III. Virology ........................................................................................................................ 1-3 IV. Fluorescent Antibody Test (FAT) ................................................................................ 1-4 V. ELISA Sampling of Kidneys for the BKD Agent (see ELISA Chapter 9).................... 1-5 VI. Parasitology and General Necropsy ........................................................................... 1-5 VII. Histology ...................................................................................................................... 1-5
    [Show full text]
  • My Fish Are Dying!
    My Fish Are Dying! Billy J. Higginbotham Todd D. Sink Professor & Extension Wildlife & Assistant Professor & Extension Fisheries Specialist Fisheries Specialist Fisheries biologists and county Extension agents will hear these words countless times throughout the year, especially during the summer months. As a general rule, small ponds intensively managed for catfish are the most susceptible to die-off problems. Other common scenarios for summer die-off problems are ponds with large quantities of aquatic vegetation, ponds that are heavily or frequently fed with commercial fish diets, ponds that were stocked heavily or excessively and biomass now exceeds carrying capacity, or ponds that experience phytoplankton die-offs caused by a multitude of different reasons. How do you determine the cause of a fish die- off? In most cases, asking the right questions will lead you to the cause or causes. Here are the questions I ask and the assessments made based on answers received to help a frantic pond owner: 1) When did the fish start dying and for how long have they been dying? The reason for this question is to determine if there is acute (very rapid) or chronic (slow and prolonged) mortality. The rate of fish mortality helps provide clues as to the cause. Oxygen depletions are typically acute mortality events in which the fish die quickly, within a few to several Solutions hours, and then the mortality ends. Chronic mortality spanning several days or even weeks is typically associated with disease or parasite issues where portions of the fish population die over prolonged periods. Exposure to lethal concentrations of pesticides or herbicides can cause either acute or chronic mortality, dependent upon the dose of the chemical the Aggie Extension fish were exposed to, although mortality tends to be more acute as toxic pesticides tend to dilute and degrade quickly in the aquatic environment by simple dilution, oxidation, microbial deterioration, or UV exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Conditions in Freshwater Aquarium Fish Fish Are the Largest and Most Species-Rich Group of Vertebrates, Numbering 60,229 Species and Subspecies
    WILDLIFE and EXOTICS | FISH ONLINE EDITION Common conditions in freshwater aquarium fish Fish are the largest and most species-rich group of vertebrates, numbering 60,229 species and subspecies. Given there is such a plethora of species, fish have adapted to a wide range of aquatic environments – from the oceans to desert puddles, and from deep-sea hydrothermal vents to glacial mountain lakes and streams (Weber, Sonya Miles 2013). This article focuses on cold and tropical freshwater fish that are kept as pets. BVSc CertAVP(ZM) MRCVS Sonya qualified from Bristol In this author’s experience, University in 2013. After there are a large variety of beginning her professional pathogens that can affect career in small animal practice, freshwater fish. Stress she now works at Highcroft and subsequent immune Exotic Vets where she sees a suppression – invariably wide variety of species. She caused by poor water has a special interest in reptile quality – often underpin the medicine and surgery, but enjoys pathogenesis of many of all aspects of being an exotic these ubiquitous organisms. species veterinary surgeon. Underlying causes should, therefore, always be Sonya runs North Somerset investigated and corrected Reptile Rescue in her spare time. (Roberts et al, 2009; Roberts- Sweeney, 2016). Unlike mammalian patients, Figure 1. A blood sample being taken from the caudal vein in a fish. samples taken for culture and sensitivity testing in freshwater to cause infections and, as ensuring that the head is also fish should be cultured at such, first-choice antibiotics removed and the remaining room temperature (22°- should target them (Roberts- wound treated with a 25°C).
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Special/Management Report 08
    llBRARY INSTITUTE FOR FIS"· -��rs �ESEARCH University Museums Annex • Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 •nuuu.uJt orr---- c om mon DISEASES. PARASITES.AnD AnomALIES OF ffilCHIGAn FISHES ■ ■ •• ■ ■ ■ •••••• ■• ■• ••••••• ■ ••• -••••• -----•• ■ ■ •• ■ ■ •••• ■ •••• ■• ■ ••••.• •• ■ ■ ■ ■• ■ •• ■ •••• ■ ■•• ••••••••••••••• ■• - Michigan Department Of Natural Resources • FIS• h er1es. · D ••IYISIOn• .. � .. ... .- .... ... MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION Lake St. Clair Great Lakes Stati.on 33135 South River Road rt!:;..,I. R.. t-1 Mt. Clemens, Michigan 48045 . � ve - �Av . ... � ··�,- , ,. ' . TO: "1>ave Weaver,. Regional Fisheries Program Manager> Region. III RayRon Spitler,. Fisheries Biologist� District 14 .... ;·shepherd, -� Fis�eries Biologis.t11t District 11 FROM: Bob Baas ,. Biologise In Cbarge11t Lake St. Clair Great Lakes. Stati.ou SUBJECT: Impact of the red worm parasite on. Great Lakes yellow perch I recently receive4 an interim report fromh t e State of Ohio on red worm infestation of yellow perch in Lake Erie. The report is very long and tedious so 1·want·to summarize ·for you ·sou of the information which I think is important. The description of the red worm parasite in our 1-IDNR. disease manual is largely.outdated by this work. First ,. the Nematodes or round worms. locally called "red worms" ,. were positively identified as Eustrongylides tubifex. The genus Eustrongylides normally completes its life cycle in the proventiculus of fish-eating birds. E. tubifex was fed to domestic mallards and the red worms successfu11y matured but did not reach patentcy (females with obvtous egg development). Later abl examination of various wild aquatic birds collected on Lake Erie.showed that the red­ breasted merganser is the primary host for the adult worms. Next,. large numbers of perch were (and ra e still) being examined for rate of parasitism and its pot�ntial effects.
    [Show full text]