Planning and Building Standards Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Planning and Building Standards Committee Item No. 9(a) SCOTTISH BORDERS COUNCIL PLANNING AND BUILDING STANDARDS COMMITTEE 13TH SEPTEMBER 2010 APPLICATION FOR PLANNING CONSENT FOR THE WINNING AND WORKING OF MINERALS ITEM: REFERENCE NUMBER: 10/00469/MIN OFFICER: Stuart Herkes WARD: Mid Berwickshire PROPOSAL: Extraction of sand and gravel SITE: Land Northwest of Rumbletonlaw Farmhouse APPLICANT: Alex Brewster & Sons Partnership AGENT: AMS Associates SITE DESCRIPTION The application site is situated approximately 3.5km northeast of Gordon and 4km to the west of Greenlaw, and lies to the immediate south of the A697, on open agricultural land within the holding of Rumbletonlaw Farm. The nearest dwellings are at Hexpath Farm, the closest of which are within 250m of the site boundary, and around 500m of the proposed extraction area. Rumbletonrigg Farm is roughly 650m from the site; and Rumbletonlaw Farm and Farm Cottages, are within roughly 1.1km. The surrounding area is a gently undulating landscape of open fields, with occasional shelter belts and farm buildings. The bank of the Eden Water forms part of the western boundary. The site occupies an area of 49ha, and is currently in use as three fields in grazing, the most northerly of which is directly accessible from the A697 between Hexpath (west) and Rumbletonrigg (east). Within the site, the land generally slopes downwards from the A697 to the Eden Water, that is, in a northeastern to southwestern direction. Although there are mature shelter belts to the immediate southeast and southwest, the site is otherwise open, and because of the topography of the surrounding area, various sections of it are highly visible, albeit at a little distance (roughly 400m) from the public road (A697) to the north and west. There are no specific protective landscape designations at the site or in its immediate vicinity, and the land is not prime quality agricultural land. There are no operational quarries within 5km. The closest operational quarry, is the hard stone and rock quarry at Blinkbonny Farm, more than 7km to the south. The latter is also the only operational quarry within 10km of the site. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The applicant seeks planning consent to extract sand and gravel from a 15ha area of the site, which would be worked over a 15 year period. During this time the site would be subject to soil stripping, sand and gravel extraction, and reinstatement. Beyond this period, an additional 18 months would be allowed for final restoration Planning and Building Standards Committee 1 and aftercare. It is advised that up to 100,000 tonnes of material would be extracted per annum during the 15 years that the quarry would be in operation. The total potential tonnage is expected to be in the order of 840,000 tonnes (allowing for a washout percentage of 20%). It is proposed that the site should be accessed from the A697 and that it would be served by a compound area, to be located in the southeast corner of the extraction site. Extraction Area The 15ha extraction area would be located roughly 250m to the south of the A697. At its highest point, the land within this area is slightly over 190m, which falls away towards the west, to slightly over 166m. Much of this area, particularly towards the west would inevitably be visible from the public realm, most noticeably from the A697 and the vicinity of Hexpath Farm. From here it is viewed as a grass topped area forming part of a wider amorphous landscape of gently undulating farmland. Extraction would take place in 10 phases between Year 1 and Year 14, while restoration works would be completed in Years 14 to 15. There would be no buildings within the proposed extraction area. Two settlement lagoons (each 35 by 25m) would be located to the immediate south of the extraction area. After the conclusion of extraction operations, it is proposed that these are retained as wetland habitat. Compound Area The compound area would be located within the southeast corner of the extraction site, and would accommodate: x a site office (7.5 by 4m; 2.8m high); x concrete batching plant (maximum height, 6m) x horizontal silo (4.2m high); x weighbridge (15 by 3m; 1m high); x storage container (4 by 3m; 3m high); x ponds x parking area and x floodlighting. It is advised that the highest structure located within the compound area would be the batching plant at no more than 6m high. Access Road The quarry would be directly accessible off the A697 from a new internal access road, the first 15m of which, would be surfaced. While the access road would be 7.3m immediately behind the junction, it would narrow to 5m for the remainder of its route into the compound area. However, in response to concerns about the need to ensure that two lorries could pass on the access road, the applicant is agreeable to the access road being widened to 7m. Planning and Building Standards Committee 2 Enclosure The quarry area and access route would be fully enclosed with fencing, while appropriate warning signs would be displayed. The quarry entrance would be gated. Material from that section of the existing stone wall adjacent to the A697 which would be removed in order to accommodate the site access, would be retained and reused within the new quarry entrance. Along the northern boundary, temporary soil bunds would be created. These would have a multi-purpose role in that they would store topsoil, provide a degree of visual screening and act as barriers for noise attenuation. It is advised that these would be about 3 to 4m high. Along the eastern boundary of the site, a permanent amenity bank would be created to screen views and attenuate noise from the compound area and access road. Operations The development would comprise surface removal of sand and gravel to an average depth of 3.5m with minor extraction to 5m. No underground workings (mining) would take place. Excavation would be conducted by front end loading shovel or tracked excavator operating on the quarry floor. These would load dump trucks that would transport the material to the on-site plant area for processing. Although the extraction site would be 15ha in extent, only 2 to 3ha would be worked at any one time. Overburden would be re-used to fill the worked out quarry. From Year 2 onwards, a programme of restoration would be operated in conjunction with extraction work. Top soil and sub soil would be transported out with the extraction area and stored separately from one another to prevent intermixing. These would then be used in the restoration works. The applicant has supplied details and supporting drawings of a detailed phasing of operations on the site, indicating the progress of both extraction and restoration operations. Sand and gravel extraction would occur within Phases 1 to 5. The processing plant would comprise mobile screening and wash plant located at the quarry compound area with dust suppression arrangements fitted. Conveyor discharges and other relevant areas would be fitted with suitable belt scrapers designed in such a manner that all material recovered would be returned to the process flow. It is anticipated that the quarry would be operated for 50 weeks annually. Proposed hours of operation would be 07:00 to 19:00 from Monday to Friday; and 08:00 to 16:00 hours on Saturday, with no operations on Sundays. In terms of traffic impact, it is estimated that there would be no more than 20 HGV movements in and out of the site per day. It is anticipated that the majority of vehicles would be 20 tonne trucks, with more limited use of larger artic lorries. Employment It is advised that the proposal would provide direct employment for 8 people, with indirect employment within the region for a further 15 people, mainly within the haulage sector. Planning and Building Standards Committee 3 Water Environment Lagoons constructed within the operational area would serve as water balancing ponds to control flow and quantity into the adjoining watercourse running along the southern boundary of the site. The plant would operate on a closed cycle system, with clarified water being returned from the silt settlement lagoons to the plant. Lighting Lighting would only be operated during hours of darkness and would be contained within the compound area. It would be fitted with shields filled to direct the light downwards and restrict the spread of light. The alumina would be examined to control the intensity of light. Within the extraction area, the only lighting would be at the working face, the operating machines having their own lights. All lighting would comply with the Quarry Regulations 1999 Health and Safety at Quarries Approved Code of Practice. Restoration Throughout the operation of the proposed development, no previous restored area would be traversed after final reinstatement works have been carried out. After 15 years, the soils from the baffle embankments would be spread over the final areas to be reinstated (compound and infrastructure areas); all site plant removed; and the site settlement lagoons would be formed into wetland features. It is advised that a detailed restoration plan would be prepared for the quarry in consultation with the site owner and Planning Authority. However, indicative restoration proposals are provided in the Environmental Statement. This shows that restoration of the site would include a new layout, with the land being profiled more simply. The land would be graded to tie with the surrounding land at the site boundary and graded to allow run-off and to alleviate ponding. The applicant has provided a photo montage to indicate this appearance.
Recommended publications
  • Northumberland Local Plan Core Strategy
    Northumberland Local Plan Core Strategy Strategic Land Review – North Northumberland Delivery Area October 2015 Strategic Land Review North Northumberland Delivery Area 1. Introduction 1.1 The North Northumberland Delivery Area is bounded to the north by the Scottish Border, to the west by the Cheviot Hills of the Northumberland National Park and to the south by the Simonside Hills and the Coquet Valley. The coast, which is designated an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, forms the eastern boundary. The delivery area includes the Main Towns of Alnwick and Berwick- upon-Tweed, and the Service Centres of Belford, Seahouses, Rothbury and Wooler. The small areas which cover these settlements, and the Rest of the North Delivery Area is shown below. Figure 1: North Northumberland Delivery Area 1 2. Alnwick Introduction 2.1 Alnwick is one of two Main Towns in the North Delivery Area. The small area is comprised of the parishes of Alnwick and Denwick. An emerging Neighbourhood Plan covers the same area. Figure 2: Alnwick small area Role and function 2.2 Alnwick has a number of employment sites, mainly along the south east approach into town, and on the other side of the A1. It is influenced by the Tyne and Wear conurbation in terms of travel to work but to a lesser extent than towns in the Central and South East Delivery Areas of the County. 2.3 The town is linked to the north and south by the A1 road corridor, which is dualled either side of Alnwick but with long stretches of single carriageway separating Alnwick from Morpeth, and Berwick-upon-Tweed.
    [Show full text]
  • Swarland Brickworks, Thrunton Landscape and Visual Appraisal
    PUBLICATION TITLE: Swarland Brickworks, Thrunton Landscape and Visual Appraisal JOB NUMBER: 1248 (PJ2728) VERSION: Final Issue – March 2021 CLIENT: Mr C Blythe Prepared by: Sharon Lumb Checked by: Ros Southern This report has been prepared by Southern Green Ltd with reasonable skill, care and diligence, within the terms of the contract with the client National Trust. No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior written approval of the above parties. Page 1 of 27 CONTENTS FIG REF PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 3 1.2 Site Location and Study Area Fig 1 3 1.3 Site Description and Context Fig 2 4 1.4 The Development Proposal Fig 3 4 2.0 METHODOLOGY 2.1 Methodology for Landscape and Visual Appraisal 5 2.2 Terminology 5 3.0 BASELINE CONDITION 3.1 Landscape and Planning Designations Fig 4-6 6 3.2 Landscape Character Fig 7-9 9 3.3 Visual Context Fig10-28 14 4.0 APPRAISAL OF PREDICTED EFFECTS 4.1 Landscape Character Appraisal Fig 7-9 16 4.2 Representative Viewpoint Appraisal Fig 10-28 17 5.0 MITIGATION and RECOMMENDATIONS Fig 29 23 6.0 SUMMARY and CONCLUSIONS 24 APPENDICES Appendix A – References Appendix B – Figures Page 2 of 27 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.1.1 This Landscape and Visual Appraisal (LVA) has been prepared by Southern Green Ltd Chartered Landscape Architects, commissioned by Mr C Blythe (“the client”), to support the planning application for the development of the former Swarland Brickworks site for residential and tourism uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Tor House, Cornhill-On-Tweed, Northumberland
    TOR HOUSE, CORNHILL-ON-TWEED, NORTHUMBERLAND TOR HOUSE CORNHILL-ON-TWEED, NORTHUMBERLAND, TD12 4QA Beautiful period home with annexe accommodation Approximate mileages: Berwick 13 miles, Kelso 10 miles, Edinburgh 49 miles, Newcastle 58 miles. Accommodation in brief: Main House Ground fl oor: Drawing room, dining room, family room, study, sewing room, breakfasting kitchen, bathroom, utility room. First fl oor: Master bedroom with en-suite bathroom, guest bedroom with en-suite bathroom, double bedroom, WC. Annexe ‘The Stables’: Living room, 2 double bedrooms, kitchenette, bathroom. Outside: 2 acres of beautiful gardens. Garage with offi ce/storage room. Edinburgh offi ce 22 Young Street Edinburgh EH2 4JB t 0131 344 0880 [email protected] savills-smithsgore.co.uk Situation Tor House has a fine setting in the pretty village of Cornhill-on-Tweed which lies on the Scottish border approximately 1 mile from Coldstream. Known as the first and last village of England, Cornhill boasts a beautiful boutique hotel with bar and restaurant and has a local shop and Post Office. The market town of Coldstream lies to the North East on the north bank of a long majestic bend of the River Tweed. Coldstream has a range of local facilities; there is a primary school, a supermarket, bank, Post Office, and a good range of local shops. The main A697 road links Northumberland to the Scottish Borders and gives easy access to both Edinburgh and Newcastle. The coastal town of Berwick-upon-Tweed is only 13 miles to the east where there is a main line railway service and further amenities including a Marks and Spencer and a Tesco supermarket.
    [Show full text]
  • Northumberland Local Development Plan Core Strategy Preferred Options Consultation Document: February 2013 Contents
    Northumberland Local Development Plan Core Strategy Preferred Options Consultation Document: February 2013 Contents Foreword iii 1 Introduction 1 2 A spatial portrait of Northumberland 5 3 Spatial vision and objectives - delivering sustainable development 7 4 Delivering the vision - the spatial strategy for Northumberland 11 5 Housing 27 6 Economy 42 7 Town centres and retailing 57 8 Green Belt 69 9 Minerals 73 10 Waste 93 11 Renewable and low carbon energy 100 12 Sustainable construction and small-scale renewable energy 106 13 Transportation 113 14 Information and communication technologies 123 15 Community facilities 126 16 Natural and historic environment 129 17 Water environment 149 18 Making it happen 157 Glossary 159 Appendices A Town and district centre boundaries 170 B Car parking standards 182 C Audit of services and facilities survey data 188 Northumberland Core Strategy Preferred Options Consultation Document - February 2013 Foreword Foreword In summer 2012 the Council undertook extensive engagement on the Core Strategy Issues and Options document, which was the first stage of preparing the new set of planning policies for Northumberland. There was a significant public response to the consultation which illustrates that communities across Northumberland want to be engaged in shaping the future of Northumberland. This is the second stage in producing the planning policies for Northumberland. This Preferred Options document has been informed by local opinions, together with further work. The document identifies preferred policy options for most topic areas. However, feedback from the Issues and Options consultation has highlighted that there is still further work to do in particular around housing numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • A697 Road Safety Review Main Report
    Transportation Northumberland County Council February 2015 A697 Road Safety Review Final Report Prepared by: ............................................................. Checked by: ........................................................................ Paul McKenna Neil Brownbridge Engineer Regional Director Approved by: ............................................................. Jonathan Oakes Director Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by - Draft NB JAJO 05.12.14 1 Client comments incorporated NPW JAJO 29.01.15 2 Members feedback incorporated NPW JAJO 12.02.15 3 Further Client/Members comments incorporated NPW JAJO 18.02.15 First Floor, One Trinity Gardens, Quayside, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 2HF Telephone: 0191 224 6500 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No: 60289709 Reference: M006_TRA_RT_001 Date Created: 18.02.15 This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited for the sole use of our client (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM Limited and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM Limited, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM Limited. Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Item No 4 SCOTTISH BORDERS COUNCIL PLANNING and BUILDING STANDARDS COMMITTEE
    Item No 4 SCOTTISH BORDERS COUNCIL PLANNING AND BUILDING STANDARDS COMMITTEE MINUTE of MEETING of the PLANNING AND BUILDING STANDARDS COMMITTEE held in the Council Headquarters, Newtown St. Boswells on 9 August 2010 at 10 a.m. ------------------ Present: - Councillors J. Houston (Chairman), J. Brown, N. Calvert, J. A. Fullarton, T. Jones, G. Logan, J. Mitchell, D. Moffat, C. Riddell-Carre, R. Smith, N. Watson. Apologies:- Councillors J. Hume, T. Weatherston. In Attendance: - Development Manager (Projects, Review & Performance), Development Manager (Applications), Assistant Road User Manager, Managing Solicitor – Commercial Services, Committee and Elections Team Leader. ---------------------------------------- MINUTE 1. There had been circulated copies of the Minute of the Meeting of 5 July 2010. DECISION APPROVED for signature by the Chairman. APPLICATIONS 2. There had been circulated copies of reports by the Head of Planning and Building Standards on applications for planning permission requiring consideration by the Committee. DECISION DEALT with the applications as detailed in the Appendix to this Minute. MEMBERS Councillors Fullarton and Mitchell left the meeting following consideration of application 10/00499/FUL. Councillor Brown left during consideration of application 10/00682/FUL. APPEALS AND REVIEWS 3. There had been circulated copies of a report by the Head of Planning and Building Standards on Appeals to the Scottish Ministers and Local Reviews. DECISION NOTED:- (a) that an appeal had been received in respect of the installation
    [Show full text]
  • Berwick-Upon-Tweed Borough Local Plan Adopted April 1999
    BERWICK-UPON-TWEED BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN ADOPTED APRIL 1999 Planning Unit Berwick-upon-Tweed Borough Council Council Offices Wallace Green Berwick-upon-Tweed TD15 1ED CONTENTS Page Contents i List of Policies iv List of Proposals viii List of Tables and Figures ix 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. The Planning Context 1 1.2. Status of the Development Plan 2 1.3. Functions of the Local Plan 2 1.4. Plan Preparation and Public Consultation 2 1.5. The Deposit Stage 2 1.6. How to Use the Plan 3 1.7. Implementation, Monitoring and Review 3 2. THE BOROUGH 5 2.1. Population 5 2.2. Communications 7 2.3. Economic and Social Activity 8 2.4. Landscape, Buildings and Habitat 10 3. THE FRAMEWORK 12 3.1. The Local Plan Strategy 12 3.2. Sustainable Development 14 3.3. The Framework Policies 15 3.4. Environmental Wealth 15 3.5. Landscape 16 3.6. Berwick-upon-Tweed 23 3.7. Nature Conservation 24 3.8. Trees and Hedgerows 28 3.9. Derelict Land 29 3.10. Agricultural Land 30 3.11. Water Resources and the Water Environment 31 3.12. Human Heritage 32 3.13. Environmental Assessment 38 3.14. Planning Obligations 39 3.15. Transport and the Location of Development 39 3.16. Social and Economic Welfare 40 3.17. Developing the Local Plan Strategy 40 4. SHELTER 42 4.1. The Strategic Context 43 4.2. Distribution of Development 45 4.3. Housing in the Countryside 46 4.4. Affordable Housing for Local Needs 48 4.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses A landscape archaeological study of the Mesolithic Neolithic in the mileld basin, Northumberland Waddington, Clive How to cite: Waddington, Clive (1998) A landscape archaeological study of the Mesolithic Neolithic in the mileld basin, Northumberland, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/5004/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 A LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE MESOLITHIC-NEOLITHIC IN THE MILFIELD BASIN, NORTHUMBERLAND Clive Waddington Thesis Submitted for Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without the written consent of the author and information derived from it should be acknowledged. University of Durham Department of Archaeology 1998 1 6 1999 Clive Waddington PhD Thesis A landscape archaeological study of the Mesolithic-Neolithic in the Milfield basin, Northumberland ABSTRACT The primary objective of this thesis is the construction of a landscape-scale synthesis of past human behaviour during the Mesolithic-Neolithic in the Milfield Basin, Northumberland.
    [Show full text]
  • Tel: 01665 606800
    Residential Development Site Price On Bells Croft, East Park, Longhorsley, Morpeth Application Residential Development Site in Longhorsley, just North of Morpeth. Currently has Outline Planning Permission for 12 Residential Units, with the potential for further development subject to the necessary consents. • Exciting Development Opportunity • Approximately 0.6 hectares (1.48 acres) • Outline Planning Permission • Greenfield Site • 12 Residential Units • Potential for further development Tel: 01665 606800 www.youngsrps.com Description We are delighted to offer for sale a residential development site with outline planning permission granted for the erection of 12 residential dwellings. Located to the east of the village of Longhorsley and to the east of Normandy Terrace, the site extends to 0.6 hectares or thereabouts and is shown edged in red on the site plan. Currently there is outline planning permission on approximately 0.37 hectares (shown hatched black), however there is potential for further development on the rest of the site subject to the necessary consents. Local Authority Northumberland County Council Interested parties should satisfy themselves as to the site area, site conditions and development potential by Planning Permission making their own site investigations and enquiries. Outline Planning Permission was granted in March 2013 by Northumberland County Council, Application no. Longhorsley Parish Council currently own the access to 12/03472/OUT. This includes a Section 106 agreement dated the site, however there are agreed terms in place to February 2013. Interested parties should satisfy themselves of enable access to be granted to a limit of 12 dwellings. the planning status of the site prior to purchase.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk at Lauder and Earlston: the Historical Record
    Flood risk at Lauder and Earlston: the historical record Dr Duncan W Reed 17 April 2018 A pro bono report Context The report explores the history of flooding from the Leader Water and Turfford Burn. If something more useful than risk assessment is to emerge from the Earlston Flood Study, it will be important to understand why redevelopment in Earlston has never quite grasped the limitations imposed by its setting alongside the Burn, in spite of drainage improvements undertaken in the late 1890s and again in the late 1960s. Perhaps because of the recurrent flooding problem with the Turfford Burn, flood risk at Earlston from the Leader itself has not always gained the attention it deserves. SEPA’s flood- risk map indicates that a large Leader flood could have high impact there. A few residents and businesses are exposed to flood risk from both the Leader and the Burn. However, the large majority are principally vulnerable to one rather than the other. This will understandably influence their expectation of actions to be prioritised following the Earlston Flood Study. This split could make for a rocky road if the two problems continue to be kept under one umbrella. The situation at Lauder is helped by special factors that have in the main kept development away from the Leader Water. There are relatively few properties currently mapped as at risk from the Leader Water. However, it is demonstrated that the flood-risk modelling and mapping work has not taken adequate account of the historical flood record. A surprising planned development at Thirlestane makes Leader flood-risk topical from the Harry Burn to Earlston, and possibly beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Northumberland County Council
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY COUNCIL Report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions November 1999 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND The Local Government Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament. Our task is to review and make recommendations to the Government on whether there should be changes to the structure of local government, the boundaries of individual local authority areas, and their electoral arrangements. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) We are statutorily required to review periodically the electoral arrangements – such as the number of councillors representing electors in each area and the number and boundaries of electoral divisions, or wards – of every principal local authority in England. In broad terms our objective is to ensure that the number of electors represented by each councillor in an area is as nearly as possible the same, taking into account local circumstances. We can recommend changes to division boundaries, and the number of councillors and division names. This report sets out the Commission’s final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for Northumberland County Council. ©Crown Copyright 1999 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, ©Crown Copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2020
    October 2020 Ford Castle Adventure to withdraw from historic Ford Castle Ford Castle Adventure Ltd, which has operated a residential adventure and activity centre in Ford Castle since 2012, has taken the decision to withdraw from the site and to concentrate on its longer- standing activities in France. Leased to Northumberland County Council from 1956 until the Council formally surrendered it in 2016, Ford Castle has welcomed many thousands of young people from Northumberland and further afield, to enjoy a residential opportunity full of activity and learning. Peter Smith, director of Ford Castle Adventure, said: “The world pandemic of Covid-19 has brought unforeseen consequences to a business like ours. We were looking forward to having full occupation of the castle once the crucial building restoration works were completed last year. Although we have explored every possible way to keep an activity centre of this type open for groups of young children and their teachers, and to uphold the requirements of distance, hygiene and protection, the issues have proved insurmountable.” Lord Joicey, director of Ford & Etal Estates where the castle lies, added: “To say we are sorry that Ford Castle Adventure is withdrawing is a massive understatement. Peter and his team have committed so much to providing activities for school groups and young people. Young people and school leaders who have enjoyed being here in recent years will know what Ford Castle offers, but the outbreak of Covid-19 means that no-one can say how, or indeed whether, it can operate in the future. It is upsetting for everyone, particularly the locally-employed staff.” Dating from the 14th century, Ford Castle has a long history that reflects the Border skirmishes.
    [Show full text]