DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Investigation Report: E.I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Investigation Report: E.I Toxic Chemical Release at the U.S. Chemical Safety and DuPont La Porte Chemical Facility Hazard Investigation Board La Porte, Texas | Incident Date: November 15, 2014 | No. 2015-01-I-TX Investigation Report Published: June 2019 Investigation Report EY SSUES K I : • Emergency Planning and Response (Preparedness) • Implementation of Process Safety Management Systems • Assessment of Process Safety Culture FINAL COPY Toxic Chemical Release at the DuPont La Porte Chemical Facility U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board La Porte, Texas | Incident Date: November 15, 2014 | No. 2015-01-I-TX The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) is an independent federal agency whose mission is to drive chemical safety change through independent investigations to protect people and the environment. The CSB is a scientific investigative organization, not an enforcement or regulatory body. Established by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, the CSB is responsible for determining accident causes, issuing safety recommendations, studying chemical safety issues, and evaluating the effectiveness of other government agencies involved in chemical safety. More information about the CSB is available at www.csb.gov. The CSB makes public its actions and decisions through investigative publications, all of which may include safety recommendations when appropriate. Types of publications include: Investigation Reports: Formal, detailed reports on significant chemical incidents that include key findings, root causes, and safety recommendations Investigation Digests: Plain-language summaries of Investigation Reports Case Studies: Reports that examine fewer issues than Investigation Reports Safety Bulletins: Short publications typically focused on a single safety topic Hazard Investigations: Broader studies of significant chemical hazards Safety Videos: Videos that animate aspects of an incident or amplify CSB safety messages CSB products can be freely accessed at www.csb.gov or obtained by contacting: U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board Office of Congressional, Public, and Board Affairs 1750 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 910 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 261-7600 No part of the conclusions, findings, or recommendations of the Board relating to any accidental release or the investigation thereof shall be admitted as evidence or used in any action or suit for damages arising out of any matter mentioned in such report. See 42 U.S.C. § 7412(r)(6)(G). Page 2 FINAL COPY Toxic Chemical Release at the DuPont La Porte Chemical Facility U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board La Porte, Texas | Incident Date: November 15, 2014 | No. 2015-01-I-TX TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 7 2 INCIDENT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................................... 13 METHYL MERCAPTAN RELEASE ..................................................................................................................................... 14 EMERGENCY RESPONSE ............................................................................................................................................... 21 3 DELAYED AWARENESS OF TOXIC CHEMICAL RELEASE BY OPERATIONS ................................................................. 28 4 EMERGENCY RESPONSE OPERATIONS .................................................................................................................. 31 ERT BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................... 33 PROCESS COORDINATOR WAS MISSING ......................................................................................................................... 34 DELAY IN ERT READINESS TO SEARCH FOR MISSING WORKERS ........................................................................................... 38 4.3.1 Call for ERT Response ....................................................................................................................................... 38 4.3.2 ERT Mini‐Pumper Truck Not Operational ......................................................................................................... 39 THE SEARCH FOR MISSING WORKERS WAS HIGH RISK ...................................................................................................... 40 4.4.1 Entry into Potentially Explosive Atmosphere .................................................................................................... 41 4.4.2 No Technology to Locate Missing Workers ...................................................................................................... 43 4.4.3 Unrecognized Manufacturing Building Collapse Hazard .................................................................................. 43 DIFFICULTIES NAVIGATING MANUFACTURING BUILDING .................................................................................................... 44 NO ANALYSIS OF PROCESS DATA TO IDENTIFY SOURCE OF LEAK .......................................................................................... 47 INADEQUATE CREATION AND CONTROL OF HOT ZONE ....................................................................................................... 50 DEFICIENCIES IN EVALUATING RISK TO THE PUBLIC ............................................................................................................ 52 4.8.1 Release Modeling ............................................................................................................................................. 53 4.8.2 Physical Properties of Methyl Mercaptan ......................................................................................................... 56 4.8.3 Chemical Sensor Data ....................................................................................................................................... 58 4.8.4 Air Monitoring .................................................................................................................................................. 59 EMERGENCY RESPONSE CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................... 60 5 DUPONT’S PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .......................................................................................... 61 OSHA ..................................................................................................................................................................... 62 5.1.1 The Process Safety Management Standard ...................................................................................................... 62 5.1.2 DuPont La Porte’s Implementation of PSM ...................................................................................................... 63 5.1.3 Recent Developments Affecting the PSM Standard .......................................................................................... 65 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ......................................................................................................................... 65 5.2.1 Risk Management Plan Rule ............................................................................................................................. 65 5.2.2 DuPont La Porte’s Implementation of RMP ...................................................................................................... 67 5.2.3 Recent Developments Affecting the RMP Rule ................................................................................................. 68 AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL ................................................................................................................................... 69 5.3.1 History of Responsible Care .............................................................................................................................. 70 5.3.2 Responsible Care Requirements ....................................................................................................................... 71 5.3.3 Responsible Care Conformance Audits ............................................................................................................. 73 Page 3 FINAL COPY Toxic Chemical Release at the DuPont La Porte Chemical Facility U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board La Porte, Texas | Incident Date: November 15, 2014 | No. 2015-01-I-TX 5.3.4 Recent Developments in Responsible Care ....................................................................................................... 76 5.3.5 Responsible Care Improvement Opportunities ................................................................................................. 77 DUPONT’S DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ITS PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .......................................... 80 5.4.1 Building a Safety Culture .................................................................................................................................. 82 5.4.2 Using the Process Safety Management and Risk Model .................................................................................. 92 DUPONT’S PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................... 94 6 PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bioinspired Intrinsic Control of Freeze Cast Composites: Harnessing Hydrophobic Hydration and Clathrate Hydrates
    Acta Materialia 114 (2016) 67e79 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Acta Materialia journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actamat Full length article Bioinspired intrinsic control of freeze cast composites: Harnessing hydrophobic hydration and clathrate hydrates * Steven E. Naleway a, , Christopher F. Yu b, Rachel L. Hsiong b, Arijit Sengupta e, Peter M. Iovine e, John A. Hildebrand c, Marc A. Meyers a, b, d, Joanna McKittrick a, b a Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA b Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA c Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA d Department of NanoEngineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA e Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA 92110, USA article info abstract Article history: Bioinspired ZrO2-epoxy, two-phase composite materials were fabricated by the freeze casting fabrication Received 7 January 2016 technique followed by polymer infiltration. These materials were intrinsically controlled by adding Received in revised form varying concentrations of the monofunctional alcohols ethanol (EtOH), n-propanol (n-PrOH) and n- 9 May 2016 butanol (n-BuOH). The microstructures of freeze cast scaffolds created with these alcohol additives Accepted 10 May 2016 demonstrated maximum pore areas (peak Ap) at concentrations of 10, 5e7 and 3 vol% for EtOH, n-PrOH and n-BuOH respectively. Differential scanning calorimetry analyses of binary mixtures of these additives and water suggested only n-PrOH was capable of developing clathrate hydrates.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Quarter Report
    Quarterly Holdings Report for Fidelity® Variable Insurance Products: Mid Cap Portfolio March 31, 2021 VIPMID-QTLY-0521 1.799869.117 Schedule of Investments March 31, 2021 (Unaudited) Showing Percentage of Net Assets Common Stocks – 99.3% Shares Value Shares Value COMMUNICATION SERVICES – 3.5% Tapestry, Inc. 673,600 $ 27,759,056 Entertainment – 2.3% thredUP, Inc. (b) 26,600 620,578 Activision Blizzard, Inc. 1,187,600 $ 110,446,800 236,705,162 Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (a) 612,400 12,499,084 TOTAL CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY 1,215,512,530 Electronic Arts, Inc. 287,790 38,958,132 Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (b) 245,500 20,781,575 182,685,591 CONSUMER STAPLES – 5.3% Interactive Media & Services – 0.5% Beverages – 0.6% Bumble, Inc. 39,400 2,457,772 C&C Group PLC (United Kingdom) (b) 7,982,445 30,922,922 IAC (b) 179,700 38,870,907 Monster Beverage Corp. (b) 183,000 16,669,470 41,328,679 47,592,392 Media – 0.7% Food & Staples Retailing – 2.6% Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. 1,986,185 57,996,602 BJ’s Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. (b) 1,891,100 84,834,746 Performance Food Group Co. (b) 1,118,796 64,453,838 TOTAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES 282,010,872 U.S. Foods Holding Corp. (b) 1,638,300 62,451,996 211,740,580 CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY – 15.0% Food Products – 1.1% Automobiles – 0.2% Nomad Foods Ltd. (b) 3,382,400 92,880,704 Harley‑Davidson, Inc. 474,400 19,023,440 Household Products – 1.0% Diversified Consumer Services – 0.6% Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking Water Compliance Plan
    DRINKING WATER COMPLIANCE PLAN CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS RCRA PERMIT NO. NCD047368642-R2-M3 Prepared for: The Chemours Company FC, LLC Corporate Remediation Group 22828 NC Highway 87 W Fayetteville, NC 28306-7332 Prepared by: PARSONS 4701 Hedgemore Drive Charlotte, NC 28209 April 2019 Chemours PN 504552 Parsons PN 449338 DRINKING WATER COMPLIANCE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Consent Order ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Call Line ............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PRIVATE WELL TESTING ................................................................................... 3 2.1 Additional Drinking Water Well Testing .......................................................... 3 2.2 Re-Analysis of Previously-Collected Groundwater Samples ......................... 4 2.3 Annual Re-Testing ............................................................................................ 5 2.4 Provision of Sampling Results ........................................................................ 5 2.5 Verification of Vacant Properties ..................................................................... 5 3.0 INTERIM REPLACEMENT OF PRIVATE DRINKING WATER SUPPLIES .......... 6 3.1 Replacement Drinking Water Supplies ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economy League of Greater Philadelphia Builds Leadership Team with Addition of Four New Staff Members
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Amanda Piccirilli-Hall 6484-680-1988 [email protected] Economy League of Greater Philadelphia Builds Leadership Team With Addition of Four New Staff Members New staff deepens Economy League’s commitment to social and community challenges, innovative programming and insightful resources to address social and community challenges PHILADELPHIA (Feb. 13, 2020) – The Economy League of Greater Philadelphia, the region’s think-and-do tank that addresses critical issues facing the Greater Philadelphia area, has brought on four new staff members to help the organization continue to provide impactful research, connect diverse leaders, and advance shared solutions. Economy League Executive Director Jeff Hornstein is augmenting the organization’s capacity with two new directors, a program manager and a new office manager. These additions will allow the Economy League to deepen existing initiatives such as the Greater Philadelphia Leadership Exchange and Philadelphia Anchors for Growth & Equity, but also to launch its new Civic Impact Labs program. “I was thrilled by the response to our job descriptions – we had incredibly talented people apply for these positions, and we were fortunate to have our offers accepted by each of our first-choice candidates,” said Hornstein. “With an expanded and energized staff and the launch of our Civic Impact Lab, 2020 is shaping up to be a great year for the Economy League!” Philadelphia Anchors for Growth and Equity (PAGE) Director J’nelle E. Lawrence, MBA will lead the PAGE initiative, a collaborative of Philadelphia’s largest eds-and-meds anchor institutions that leverages their $5.3 billion in annual spend to create job and business growth in disinvested neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Investments: 1.31.21 Holdings
    Schedule of Investments January 31, 2021 (Unaudited) Schedule of Investments LSV Small Cap Value Fund LSV Small Cap Value Fund Shares Value (000) Shares Value (000) Automotive (2.5%) Common Stock (99.1%) American Axle & Aerospace & Defense (1.4%) Manufacturing Holdings* 146,500 $ 1,291 1,213 Curtiss-Wright 12,100 $ 1,256 Cooper Tire & Rubber 33,000 2,958 Moog, Cl A 32,500 2,401 Dana 152,800 1,277 Vectrus* 18,000 925 Modine Manufacturing* 101,800 4,582 Winnebago Industries 19,200 1,326 8,065 Agricultural Products (0.9%) Automotive Retail (1.9%) Ingredion 36,900 2,785 Camping World Holdings, Cl A 33,700 1,151 Air Freight & Logistics (0.9%) 2,518 Atlas Air Worldwide Group 1 Automotive 18,300 1,101 Holdings* 43,500 2,254 Penske Automotive Group 18,400 1,298 Park-Ohio Holdings 16,500 465 Sonic Automotive, Cl A 31,700 2,719 6,068 Aircraft (1.2%) Banks (16.2%) 3,102 Hawaiian Holdings 47,000 920 Associated Banc-Corp 172,900 1,271 Bank of NT Butterfield & JetBlue Airways* 88,600 1,384 1,489 Son 45,500 SkyWest 38,200 2,346 3,680 BankUnited 67,700 Berkshire Hills Bancorp 49,800 826 1,243 Apparel Retail (1.7%) Camden National 33,100 1,491 1,608 Cathay General Bancorp 44,100 Foot Locker 36,700 Dime Community 1,739 Genesco* 44,800 Bancshares 45,300 720 Guess? 13,900 323 Federal Agricultural Shoe Carnival 37,700 1,771 Mortgage, Cl C 18,700 1,421 5,441 Financial Institutions 43,990 1,007 First Busey 28,400 587 Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods (0.5%) First Commonwealth G-III Apparel Group* 60,400 1,633 Financial 148,900 1,747 First Horizon National
    [Show full text]
  • Trian Partners Nominates Four Highly Qualified Candidates for Election to Dupont Board
    TRIAN PARTNERS NOMINATES FOUR HIGHLY QUALIFIED CANDIDATES FOR ELECTION TO DUPONT BOARD Referendum On Performance DuPont Board Has Not Held Management Accountable For Repeatedly Missing Promised Revenue And Earnings Targets Newly Revealed Poor Corporate Governance At Chemours Shows Board Disconnect From DuPont Stockholders NEW YORK, January 8, 2015 – Trian Fund Management, L.P. (“Trian”), one of the largest stockholders of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (NYSE: DD) (“DuPont”), announced today that it has nominated four highly qualified candidates for election to the DuPont Board of Directors at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Investment funds managed by Trian currently beneficially own an aggregate of approximately 24.4 million DuPont shares valued at approximately $1.8 billion. Trian believes long-term success requires each of DuPont’s business segments to achieve best-in- class operating metrics. Despite management’s rhetoric about the value of “integrated science,” the reality is that DuPont is struggling operationally: 1) earnings per share are down since 2011; 2) organic revenue growth and margins have underperformed peers in five of the Company’s seven segments; and 3) management has lowered and/or missed its own guidance to Wall Street for the third year in a row while consistently failing to achieve the revenue and margin targets presented at DuPont’s 2011 Investor Day. Trian believes the DuPont Board has not held management accountable for continuing underperformance and repeated failures to deliver publicly stated
    [Show full text]
  • BNYM Investment Port:Midcap Stock Port (Unaudited) As of Date: 09/30/2020 Common Stocks
    BNYM Investment Port:MidCap Stock Port (Unaudited) As of date: 09/30/2020 Common Stocks Identifier Security Description Shares Market Value ($) 002535300 Aaron's 7,450 422,043 00404A109 Acadia Healthcare 5,480 161,550 004498101 ACI Worldwide 13,250 346,223 00508Y102 Acuity Brands 9,470 969,255 BD845X2 Adient 12,480 216,278 00737L103 Adtalem Global Education 6,800 166,872 00766T100 AECOM 4,170 174,473 018581108 Alliance Data Systems 7,130 299,317 01973R101 Allison Transmission Holdings 7,110 249,845 00164V103 AMC Networks 10,710 264,644 023436108 Amedisys 2,760 652,547 025932104 American Financial Group 3,310 221,704 03073E105 AmerisourceBergen 2,220 215,162 042735100 Arrow Electronics 5,620 442,069 04280A100 Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals 5,670 244,150 045487105 Associated Banc-Corp 47,940 605,003 05329W102 Autonation 6,980 369,451 05368V106 Avient 23,030 609,374 053774105 Avis Budget Group 10,600 278,992 05464C101 Axon Enterprise 2,410 218,587 062540109 Bank of Hawaii 4,830 244,012 06417N103 Bank OZK 6,630 141,352 090572207 Bio-Rad Laboratories 1,480 762,881 09073M104 Bio-Techne 880 218,002 05550J101 BJs Wholesale Club Holdings 11,270 468,269 09227Q100 Blackbaud 3,750 209,363 103304101 Boyd Gaming 18,350 563,162 105368203 Brandywine Realty Trust 93,500 966,790 11120U105 Brixmor Property Group 6,300 73,647 117043109 Brunswick 8,150 480,117 12685J105 Cable One 300 565,629 127190304 CACI International, Cl. A 3,980 848,377 12769G100 Caesars Entertainment 11,890 666,553 133131102 Camden Property Trust 11,390 1,013,482 134429109 Campbell Soup 4,440
    [Show full text]
  • Journées “Hydrates”
    Journées Hydrates, Brest, 09‐13 septembre 2019 Journées “Hydrates” 09‐13 septembre 2019 IFREMER Pôle Numérique 305 Avenue Alexis de Rochon 29280 PLOUZANE 1 Journées Hydrates, Brest, 09‐13 septembre 2019 2 Journées Hydrates, Brest, 09‐13 septembre 2019 WELCOME We are pleased to welcome you for the 2nd meeting of the French research consortium GdR2026 Hydrates at the University of Bordeaux. This event brings together leading experimental, theoretical, and computational scientists from among the unusually broad community of researchers interested in the various research areas of gas hydrates going from chemical and energy engineering to geosciences and astrophysics through physical‐ chemistry and thermodynamics. The issues addressed during this meeting concern major aspects of “hydrate sciences” such as hydrate/substrates interactions, thermodynamics, formation kinetics, cage occupancy and as well as formation at extreme conditions. The workshop is divided into two parts. The first part is dedicated to meetings of french research consortiums working on a common project (ANR, EU, etc.) in closed session. The second part is the general meeting, gathering about 60 participants. Its scientific program contains about 31 presentations, including invited talks, oral contributions and poster presentations. Organizing committee Livio Ruffine ‐ IFREMER, Brest Hélène Ondréas ‐ IFREMER, Brest Marie‐Odile Lamirault‐Gall ‐ IFREMER, Brest Alison Chalm‐ IFREMER, Brest Elisabeth Savoye ‐ IFREMER, Brest Olivia Fandino‐Torres – IFREMER, Brest Arnaud Desmedt, ISM CNRS ‐ Univ. Bordeaux Karine Ndiaye, ISM CNRS ‐ Univ. Bordeaux Audrey Bourgeois, ISM CNRS ‐ Univ. Bordeaux Daniel Broseta – LFC‐R UMR 5150 CNRS, Total, Univ. Pau Scientific Committee Baptiste Bouillot ‐ LGF, UMR 5703 CNRS, Mines Saint‐Etienne Daniel Broseta – LFC‐R UMR 5150 CNRS, Total, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical Characterization Via Full Atomistic Simulation: Applications to Nanocrystallized Ice
    Mechanical Characterization via Full Atomistic Simulation: Applications to Nanocrystallized Ice A thesis presented By Arvand M.H. Navabi to The Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the field of Civil Engineering Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts August, 2016 Submitted to Prof. Steven W. Cranford Acknowledgements I acknowledge generous support from my thesis advisor Dr. Steven W. Cranford whose encouragement and availability was crucial to this thesis and also my parents for allowing me to realize my own potential. The simulations were made possible by LAMMPS open source program. Visualization has been carried out using the VMD visualization package. 3 Abstract This work employs molecular dynamic (MD) approaches to characterize the mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials via a full atomistic simulation using the ab initio derived ReaxFF potential. Herein, we demonstrate methods to efficiently simulate key mechanical properties (ultimate strength, stiffness, etc.) in a timely and computationally inexpensive manner. As an illustrative example, the work implements the described methodology to perform full atomistic simulation on ice as a material platform, which — due to its complex behavior and phase transitions upon pressure, heat exchange, energy transfer etc. — has long been avoided or it has been unsuccessful to ascertain its mechanical properties from a molecular perspective. This study will in detail explain full atomistic MD methods and the particulars required to correctly simulate crystalline material systems. Tools such as the ReaxFF potential and open-source software package LAMMPS will be described alongside their fundamental theories and suggested input methods to simulate further materials, encompassing both periodic and finite crystalline models.
    [Show full text]
  • STUDENT ENGAGEMENT and TALENT GROWTH: the Campus
    Fueling Growth: The importance of attracting & retaining early talent February 28, 2020 Agenda 1. Mission 2. Impact 3. Programs 4. Where do we go from here? The Mission Fuel the regional economy by encouraging college students to explore, live and work in Greater Philadelphia A study in 2000 identified the opportunity Enrollment at regional institutions was 213,000 FTE in 2000 Greater Philadelphia ranked 7th in the country in the concentration of college students College attainment in Philadelphia in 2000 was 17.9%, six percentage points lower than the national average 34 College & University Partners 44 Corporate Members Children’s Hospital of Frontline Education Publicis Health Amicus Therapeutics Philadelphia Children's Crisis Treatment Allied Pixel Glenmede Trust Sabre Systems Center AstraZeneca Cigna IKEA SAP Sino-American Business Bancroft Comcast Independence Blue Cross Association Corp. Bender Inc. CSL Behring JP Morgan Chase SPIN Inc. Bentley Systems CubeSmart Juno Search Partners TargetX Campbell Soup Company Deloitte Lutron TherapyNotes CardConnect Dorman Products Merakey University City Science Center CBIZ ELAP Services Pennoni USLI Chamber of Commerce for Employment Practices PHLCVB Vanguard Greater Philadelphia Solutions Public Health Management Chemours Energage WSFS (formerly Beneficial Bank) Corporation A Great Team The Impact 2000-2017: Philadelphia more than doubles young adults with college degrees The Programs: Fall in love with Philadelphia & launch here after you graduate Welcome to Philly Explore Philadelphia Launch your career in Philadelphia Launch your career in Philadelphia WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? Coming up…. Annual Meeting of Stakeholders Find IT in Philly, May 4-6, 2020 April 23, 4-7 PM Questions & Discussion Ashlie Thornbury VP, Partnerships, Campus Philly [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Wilmington Funds Holdings Template DRAFT
    Wilmington Large-Cap Strategy Fund as of 5/31/2021 (Portfolio composition is subject to change) ISSUER NAME % OF ASSETS APPLE INC 4.97% MICROSOFT CORP 4.69% AMAZON.COM INC 3.45% FACEBOOK INC 1.99% ALPHABET INC 1.80% ALPHABET INC 1.77% BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 1.48% JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.35% TESLA INC 1.20% JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.12% UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 0.98% VISA INC 0.96% NVIDIA CORP 0.96% BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.89% HOME DEPOT INC/THE 0.87% WALT DISNEY CO/THE 0.82% MASTERCARD INC 0.80% PAYPAL HOLDINGS INC 0.77% EXXON MOBIL CORP 0.68% PROCTER & GAMBLE CO/THE 0.67% COMCAST CORP 0.66% ADOBE INC 0.62% INTEL CORP 0.59% VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 0.59% CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.57% CHEVRON CORP 0.55% PFIZER INC 0.54% NETFLIX INC 0.54% AT&T INC 0.53% SALESFORCE.COM INC 0.53% ABBOTT LABORATORIES 0.51% ABBVIE INC 0.50% MERCK & CO INC 0.48% WELLS FARGO & CO 0.48% BROADCOM INC 0.47% THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC 0.47% ACCENTURE PLC 0.46% CITIGROUP INC 0.45% MCDONALD'S CORP 0.44% TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 0.44% COCA-COLA CO/THE 0.44% HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC 0.44% LINDE PLC 0.43% MEDTRONIC PLC 0.43% NIKE INC 0.43% ELI LILLY & CO 0.42% PEPSICO INC 0.42% UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 0.41% WALMART INC 0.40% DANAHER CORP 0.40% UNION PACIFIC CORP 0.40% QUALCOMM INC 0.38% BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO 0.37% ORACLE CORP 0.37% LOWE'S COS INC 0.36% BLACKROCK INC 0.35% CATERPILLAR INC 0.35% AMGEN INC 0.35% BOEING CO/THE 0.35% MORGAN STANLEY 0.35% COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.35% RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORP 0.34% STARBUCKS CORP 0.34% GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC/THE 0.34% GENERAL ELECTRIC
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Holdings As of June 30, 2019
    Investment Holdings As of June 30, 2019 Montana Board of Investments | Portfolio as of June 30, 2019 Transparency of the Montana Investment Holdings The Montana Board of Investment’s holdings file is a comprehensive listing of all manager funds, separately managed and commingled, and aggregated security positions. Securities are organized across common categories: Pension Pool, Asset Class, Manager Fund, Aggregated Individual Holdings, and Non-Pension Pools. Market values shown are in U.S. dollars. The market values shown in this document are for the individual investment holdings only and do not include any information on accounts for receivables or payables. Aggregated Individual Holdings represent securities held at our custodian bank and individual commingled accounts. The Investment Holdings Report is unaudited and may be subject to change. The audited Unified Investment Program Financial Statements, prepared on a June 30th fiscal year-end basis, will be made available once the Legislative Audit Division issues the Audit Opinion. Once issued, the Legislative Audit Division will have the Audit Opinion available online at https://www.leg.mt.gov/publications/audit/agency-search-report and the complete audited financial statements will also be available on the Board’s website http://investmentmt.com/AnnualReportsAudits. Additional information can be found at www.investmentmt.com Montana Board of Investments | Portfolio as of June 30, 2019 2 Table of Contents Consolidated Asset Pension Pool (CAPP) 4 CAPP - Domestic Equities 5 CAPP - International
    [Show full text]