Architectural Theory and Practice, and the Question of Phenomenology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Architectural Theory and Practice, and the Question of Phenomenology Architectural Theory and Practice, and the Question of Phenomenology (The Contribution of Tadao Ando to the Phenomenological Discourse) Von der Fakultät Architektur, Bauingenieurwesen und Stadtplanung der Brandenburgischen Technischen Universität Cottbus zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktor-Ingenieurs genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Mohammadreza Shirazi aus Tabriz, Iran Gutachter: : Prof. Dr. Eduard Führ Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Karsten Harries Gutachter: Gastprofessor. Dr. Riklef Rambow Tag der Verteidigung: 02. Juni 2009 Acknowledgment My first words of gratitude go to my supervisor Prof. Führ for giving me direction and support. He fully supported me during my research, and created a welcoming and inspiring atmosphere in which I had the pleasure of writing this dissertation. I am indepted to his teachings and instructions in more ways than I can state here. I am particularly grateful to Prof. Karsten Harries. His texts taught me how to think on architecture deeply, how to challenge whatever is ‘taken for granted’ and ‘remain on the way, in search of home’. I am also grateful to other colleagues in L.S. Theorie der Architektur. I want to express my thanks to Dr. Riklef Rambow who considered my ideas and texts deeply and helped me with his advice at different stages. I am thankful for the comments and kind helps I received from Dr. Katharina Fleischmann. I also want to thank Prof. Hahn from TU Dresden and other PhD students who attended in Doktorandentag meetings and criticized my presentations. I would like to express my appreciation to the staff of Langen Foundation Museum for their kind helps during my visit of that complex, and to Mr. Frey, a member of German design team, who pointed to important matters concerning design and construction of the Museum. My deepest thanks go to my wife Somayeh Falahat who is the permanent companion of mine in being ‘on the way.’ Abstract (English) Although phenomenology is primary a philosophical subject discussed by great philosophers such as Lambert, Herder, Kant, Fichte and Hegel, formulated by Husserl as a new way of doing philosophy, and later elaborated by features like Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Bachelard, and Gadamer in different ways, it has been used extensively by architectural theoreticians and architects in their investigations and designs. On the one hand, architectural theoreticians have taken phenomenological way of comprehending the world and environment as the departure point for establishing a unique understanding of architecture, city, and man-made environment, and propose a more proper method of analyzing. On the other hand, architects have tried to capture the essence of the things through a phenomenological contemplation, and incorporate their feelings into the architectural works. This dissertation intends to investigate the status of ‘phenomenology’ in the field of architectural theory and practice, study its advantages and disadvantages regarding analyzing and interpreting architectural buildings, propose a more comprehensive method of phenomenological interpretation, and examine it in the case of Langen Foundation Museum designed by Tadao Ando. This study is divided into three main parts of ‘question’, ‘inquiry’, and ‘towards an articulate phenomenological interpretation of architecture’. The first part deals with the question of phenomenology in both philosophy and architecture, and concentrates on the works of the philosophers Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and studies the architectural thoughts of Christian Norberg-Schulz, Juhani Pallasmaa, Kenneth Frampton, and Steven Holl, to introduce the main disadvantages of their phenomenological approach to architecture. The second part deals with the case study of Tadao Ando, and shows that the question of Ando in architecture is a two-fold one; the question of a relationship between theory and practice from one hand, and the question of interpretation and phenomenology on the other. To investigate this matter Ando’s architectural reflections will be introduced in the frame of main-narrative and sub-narratives. In the third part it will be shown that Ando’s reflections on architecture possess deep phenomenological concerns. Then, a new way of phenomenological interpretation– so called phenomenal phenomenology – will be drawn and applied in the case of the Langen Foundation Museum. Abstract (German) Die Phänomenologie ist primär Gegenstand philosophischer Auseinandersetzungen bedeutender Denker wie Lambert, Herder, Kant, Fichte und Hegel. Von Husserl wurde sie als neue Praktik einer anwendungsorientierten Philosophie beschrieben und später von zentralen Philosophen wie Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Bachelard, und Gadamer weiter ausgearbeitet. Aber auch Architekturtheoretiker und Architekten bedienen sich weitreichend der Phänomenologie in Forschung und Entwurf. Einerseits haben Architekturtheoretiker ein phänomenologisches Verständnis der Welt und Umwelt als Ausgangspunkt einer ganzheitliches Betrachtung von Architektur, Stadt, und künstlicher Umwelt etabliert und somit eine sachgemäßer Analysemethode durchgesetzt. Anderseits versuchten Architekten, den tatsächlichen Charakter des Untersuchten durch eine phänomenologische Herangehensweise zu erfassen, und ihre Eindrücke in architektonischen Entwürfen umzusetzen. Diese Dissertation beabsichtigt, die Bedeutung der Phänomenologie innerhalb der Theorie und Praxis von Architektur zu untersuchen, seine Vorteile und Nachteile in Bezug auf die Analyse und Interpretation des Gebäudes zu verstehen, eine deutliche und umfassende Methode der phänomenologischen Interpretation zu entwickeln, und dieses Methode im Falle des Langen Foundation Museum von Tadao Ando zu überprüfen. Die Arbeit ist in drei Hauptteile untergliedert: „Fragestellung―, „Untersuchung―, und „Plädoyer für eine phänomenologische Interpretation der Architektur―. Der erste Teil beschäftigt sich mit der Phänomenologie in Philosophie und Architektur und konzentriert sich auf die Werke der Philosophen Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger und Maurice Merleau- Ponty. Es werden architektonische Überlegungen von Christian Norberg-Schulz, Juhani Pallasmaa, Kenneth Frampton, und Steven Holl untersucht und zentrale Vorteile und Nachteile ihres phänomenologischen Architekturverständnisses dargestellt. Der zweite Teil untersucht die Fallstudie von Tadao Ando. Es wird gezeigt, dass Ando’s Architekturansatz eine zweifache Fragestellung aufwirft: die Frage des Verhältnisses von Theorie und Praxis einerseits; und die Frage der Interpretation und Phänomenologie andererseits. Zur Ermittlung dieser Fragen werden Ando’s architektonische Überlegungen durch zentrale und untergeordnete Aussagen analysiert. Im letzten Teil wird die phänomenologische Kritik an Ando’s Architekturansatzes dargestellt.. Abschließend wird eine neue phänomenologische Interpretationsmethode— die sogenannte phänomenologische Phänomenologie—präsentiert und auf die Fallstudie des Museum Langen Foundation angewendet. Architectural Theory and Practice, and the Question of Phenomenology (The Contribution of Tadao Ando to the Phenomenological Discourse) Introduction: The problem of phenomenology 1 The structure of inquiry 6 I. The Question 1. The question of phenomenology in philosophy 11 1-1 Introduction 11 1-2 The origin of the term ‘phenomenology’ 12 1-3 Phenomenology in Husserl 13 1-3-1 To the things themselves 13 1-3-2 Phenomenology as a presuppositionless science 14 1-3-3 Suspension (reduction) 14 1-3-4 Physical body and living body 15 1-3-5 Life-world 16 1-3-6 Horizon and background 17 1-4 Phenomenology in Martin Heidegger 18 1-4-1 Phenomenology as letting to be seen 18 1-4-2 The question of Being 20 1-4-3 Da-sein and Being-in-the-world 21 1-4-4 Being-in and dwelling 21 1-4-5 Against traditional opinions of space 22 1-4-6 Three types of space 23 1-4-7 Spatiality of Da-sein 26 1-4-8 The origin of the work of art 26 1-4-9 Thingly character of the work of art 27 1-4-10 Work of art and truth 27 1-4-11 Greek temple, world and setting-into-work of truth 29 1-4-12 Truth, opening up a world and setting forth of earth 31 1-4-13 Building and dwelling 34 1-4-14 The fourfold, thing and dwelling 35 1-4-15 Bridge as a gathering 35 1-4-16 The thing as fourfold 36 1-4-17 Place and space 38 1-4-18 Building and fourfold 39 1-4-19 Poetically man dwells 39 1-4-20 Language and fourfold 40 1-4-21 Bringing-into-the-work of places 41 1-5 Phenomenology in Merleau-Ponty 44 1-5-1 Phenomenology of origins 44 1-5-2 Against the science 45 1-5-3 Against Cartesianism 46 1-5-4 World and ‘body image’ 47 1-5-5 Bodily experience, body and movement 47 1-5-6 Body and space 48 1-5-7 Perspectival perception 49 1-5-8 Painting as primordial connection of the body and world 49 1-5-9 Perception and background 49 2. The question of phenomenology in architecture 52 2-1 Introduction 52 2-2 Phenomenology in Norberg-Schulz 53 2-2-1 The necessity of phenomenology 53 2-2-2 ‘Genius loci’, spirit of place 60 2-2-3 Architecture, setting-into-work of place 63 2-2-4 Place today, the loss of place 65 2-2-5 Existential space 67 2-2-6 Language and architecture, from archetype to figure 69 2-2-7 The language of architecture 71 2-2-8 Four modes of dwelling 72 2-2-9 Two aspects of dwelling, identification and orientation 73 2-2-10 Monumentality and regionalism 74 2-2-11 Winter evening, phenomenal concerns 76 2-2-12 ‘Genius Loci’, phenomenology from without, a critical review 80 2-3 Phenomenology in Juhani Pallasmaa 94 2-3-1 Phenomenology as naïve seeing 94 2-3-2 Supremacy of vision
Recommended publications
  • The Function of Reason in Hume and Consequences for the Classical
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2004 If Reason Is Not Sovereign: The Function of Reason in Hume and Consequences for the Classical/Positivist Divide, Rational Choice Theory, Low Self-Control Theory, and the Criminal Propensity Construct Michael Jason Kissner Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF CRIMINOLOGY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE IF REASON IS NOT SOVEREIGN: THE FUNCTION OF REASON IN HUME AND CONSEQUENCES FOR THE CLASSICAL/POSITIVIST DIVIDE, RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY, LOW SELF-CONTROL THEORY, AND THE CRIMINAL PROPENSITY CONSTRUCT By MICHAEL JASON KISSNER A Dissertation submitted to the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2004 The members of the Committee approve the Dissertation of Michael Jason Kissner defended on November 10, 2004. _______________________ Daniel Maier-Katkin Professor Directing Dissertation _______________________ Barney Twiss Outside Committee Member _______________________ Cecil Greek Committee Member Approved: __________________________ Thomas Blomberg, Dean, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................Page
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    2017 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT 2017 2,522 EMPLOYEES FROM 71NATIONS WORKED IN 38 COUNTRIES AND OVERSEAS PROGRAMMES IN 2017. 410 WITH MILLION EUROS OF FUNDING 229.4 WE SUPPORTED MILLION PEOPLE IN ORDER 11. 8 TO ACHIEVE 1 GOAL : Interview with Supervisory Board and Executive Board 6 WHAT WE Zero Hunger Requires Political Measures 8 WANT Welthungerhilfe's Vision 52 Project Map 10 WHAT WE Congo: Better Harvests for a Brighter Future 12 Bangladesh: The Suffering of the Rohingya 14 ACHIEVE Nepal: Fast Reaction thanks to Good Preparation 16 Sierra Leone: Creating Professional Prospects with “Skill Up!” 18 Horn of Africa: Prepared for Drought 20 New Approach: Securing Water Sustainably 22 Transparency and Impact 24 Impact Chain 27 Holding Politics Accountable 28 Campaigns and Events 2017 30 Outlook for 2018: Tapping into Potentials 48 Thank You to Our Supporters 50 This Is How We Collect Donations 51 Welthungerhilfe’s Structure 32 WHO WE ARE Forging ahead with the foundation 44 Welthungerhilfe’s Networks 47 Balance Sheet 34 FACTS AND Income and Expenditure Account 37 Income and Expenditure Account in Accordance with DZI 39 FIGURES Welthungerhilfe in Numbers 40 All Overseas Programmes 2017 42 Annual Financial Statement Foundation 46 PUBLICATION DETAILS Publisher: Order number p. 22: Thomas Rommel/WHH; pp. 23, The DZI donation Deutsche Welthungerhilfe e. V. 460-9549 24: WHH; p. 26 t./b.: Iris Olesch; p. 28: seal certifies Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 1 Deutscher Bundes tag/Trutschel; p. 29 t. l.: Welthungerhilfe‘s efficient and 53173 Bonn Cover photo Engels & Krämer GmbH; p. 29 t. r.: responsible Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Site Landscape and Building
    Location: near Neuss, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Architect: Tadao Ando (Japan) Date: 2002.8-2004.7 Site Site: On the grounds of the Museum Insel Hombroich; 1,040 Acres Langen Foundation Case Study Material: Reinforced concrete; Glass; steel. Program: Museum Program The Langen Foundation is located at the Raketenstation Hombroich, a former NATO base, in the midst of the idyllic landscape of 1,040 acres of land is being planned for an experiment in living with nature, where architects and artists from this list each envision his or her own program and its accompanying design. This lat- Japanese collection space the Hombroich cultural environment. ter effort, coordinated by the Berlin architectural office of Hoidn Wang Partner, is known as the “Hombroich spaceplacelab,” and requires that at least 90 percent of each site be left for nature. The simple shape of space inside makes people to be peaceful and Ando got involved with the art program at Hombroich through the instigation of Müller, who knew of Ando’s museums in Japan and the United States Ando’s crafted concrete geometric forms interact compellingly Visitors enter through a cut-out in the semicircular concrete wall, opening up the view to the glass, steel and concrete building. with light, water, and earth in a manner that fits in with the Hombroich identity. In 1995, Ando designed an art pavilion for Müller on the former missile base; it appealed to another German art collector, Marianne focus on the art collections. Langen, who was searching for a home for the art that she had amassed with her late husband, Viktor, a businessman, which they had housed in Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Olafur Eliasson Biography
    Olafur Eliasson Biography 1967 Born in Copenhagen 1989 – 1995 Studied at the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts in Copenhagen Lives in Copenhagen and Berlin Solo Exhibitions 2019 Olafur Eliasson: In real life, Tate Modern, London, United Kingdom, July 11, 2019 – January 5, 2020. Travel to Guggenheim Bilbao, Spain, February 14, 2020 – June 21, 2021. Tree of Codes, Opéra Bastille, Paris, France, June 26 – July 13. Y/our future is now, The Serralves Museum of Contemporary Art, Porto, Portugal, July 31, 2019 – June 14, 2020. 2018 Objets définis par l’activité, Espace Muraille, Genève, Switzerland, January 24 — April 28. Una mirada a lo que vendrá (A view of things to come), Galería Elvira González, Madrid, Spain, February 13 – April 28. Reality Projector, Marciano Art Foundation, Los Angeles, USA, March 1 – August 25. The unspeakable openness of things, Red Brick Art Museum, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, March 25 – August 12. Multiple Shadow House, Danish Achitecture Center (DAC), Copenhagen, Denmark, May 17 – Oktober 21. Olafur Eliasson: WASSERfarben (WATERcolours) , Graphische Sammlung – Pinakothek der Moderne, Munich, Germany, June 7 – September 2. The speed of your attention, Tanya Bonakdar Gallery, New York / Los Angeles, September 15 – December 22. 2017 Olafur Eliasson, Fischli/Weiß, Art Project Ibiza & Lune Rouge, Ibiza, Spain, January 21 – April 29. Olafur Eliasson: Pentagonal landscapes, EMMA – Espoo Museum of Modern Art, Espoo, Finnland, February 8 – May 21. Olafur Eliasson: Green light – An artistic workshop, The Moody Center of the Arts, Houston, Texas, USA, February 24 – Mid May. Olafur Eliasson: The listening dimension, Tanya Bonakdar Gallery, New York, March 23 – April 22.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagination: a Philosophical Examination of The
    1 The ‘Reality Oriented’ Imagination: a Philosophical Examination of the Imagination in ‘Mentalization’ and ‘Neuropsychoanalysis’. Annie Hardy Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University College London 2017 2 I, Annie Hardy, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 3 Abstract This thesis is concerned with the conceptualization of the imagination in contemporary psychoanalytic theory, focusing in particular on its connection with knowledge. I will propose that imaginative processes form the core of psychic ‘health’ by instantiating a state of mind in which the subject is genuinely open to ‘learning from experience’. At the centre of the investigation is a psychic process that I term the ‘reality oriented’ imagination: a form of conscious mental activity that facilitates an epistemological connection with both the internal and external worlds and renders the unobservable psychological experiences of others accessible. The concept of the ’reality oriented’ imagination significantly disrupts Freud’s portrayal of the imaginative processes as a form of wish-fulfilment in which the individual’s attention is drawn away from external reality and placed under the sway of the pleasure principle. Such differing presentations of the imagination across psychoanalytic models can arguably be understood by considering several major shifts in psychoanalytic theorizing since Freud’s time. I will propose that these changes can be characterised as an ‘epistemic turn’: a general movement in psychoanalysis towards framing the internal world as strategic rather than compensatory, and a corresponding understanding of psychopathological processes as a response to failures in understanding and prediction rather than instinctual conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Marianne Boesky Gallery Frank Stella
    MARIANNE BOESKY GALLERY NEW YORK | ASPEN FRANK STELLA BIOGRAPHY 1936 Born in Malden, MA Lives and works in New York, NY EDUCATION 1950 – 1954 Phillips Academy (studied painting under Patrick Morgan), Andover, MA 1954 – 1958 Princeton University (studied History and Art History under Stephen Greene and William Seitz), Princeton, NJ SELECTED SOLO AND TWO-PERSON EXHIBITIONS 2021 Brussels, Belgium, Charles Riva Collection, Frank Stella & Josh Sperling, curated by Matt Black September 8 – November 20, 2021 [two-person exhibition] 2020 Ridgefield, CT, Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum, Frank Stella’s Stars, A Survey, September 21, 2020 – September 6, 2021 Tampa, FL, Tampa Museum of Art, Frank Stella: What You See, April 2 – September 27, 2020 Tampa, FL, Tampa Museum of Art, Frank Stella: Illustrations After El Lissitzky’s Had Gadya, April 2 – September 27, 2020 Stockholm, Sweeden, Wetterling Gallery, Frank Stella, March 19 – August 22, 2020 2019 Los Angeles, CA, Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Frank Stella: Selection from the Permanent Collection, May 5 – September 15, 2019 New York, NY, Marianne Boesky Gallery, Frank Stella: Recent Work, April 25 – June 22, 2019 Eindhoven, The Netherlands, Van Abbemuseum, Tracking Frank Stella: Registering viewing profiles with eye-tracking, February 9 – April 7, 2019 2018 Tuttlingen, Germany, Galerie der Stadt Tuttlingen, FRANK STELLA – Abstract Narration, October 6 – November 25, 2018 Los Angeles, CA, Sprüth Magers, Frank Stella: Recent Work, September 14 – October 26, 2018 Princeton, NJ, Princeton University
    [Show full text]
  • Notices of the American Mathematical Society
    • ISSN 0002-9920 March 2003 Volume 50, Number 3 Disks That Are Double Spiral Staircases page 327 The RieITlann Hypothesis page 341 San Francisco Meeting page 423 Primitive curve painting (see page 356) Education is no longer just about classrooms and labs. With the growing diversity and complexity of educational programs, you need a software system that lets you efficiently deliver effective learning tools to literally, the world. Maple® now offers you a choice to address the reality of today's mathematics education. Maple® 8 - the standard Perfect for students in mathematics, sciences, and engineering. Maple® 8 offers all the power, flexibility, and resources your technical students need to manage even the most complex mathematical concepts. MapleNET™ -- online education ,.u A complete standards-based solution for authoring, nv3a~ _r.~ .::..,-;.-:.- delivering, and managing interactive learning modules \~.:...br *'r¥'''' S\l!t"AaITI(!\pU;; ,"", <If through browsers. Derived from the legendary Maple® .Att~~ .. <:t~~::,/, engine, MapleNefM is the only comprehensive solution "f'I!hlislJer~l!'Ct"\ :5 -~~~~~:--r---, for distance education in mathematics. Give your institution and your students cornpetitive edge. For a FREE 3D-day Maple® 8 Trial CD for Windows®, or to register for a FREE MapleNefM Online Seminar call 1/800 R67.6583 or e-mail [email protected]. ADVANCING MATHEMATICS WWW.MAPLESOFT.COM I [email protected]\I I WWW.MAPLEAPPS.COM I NORTH AMERICAN SALES 1/800 267. 6583 © 2003 Woter1oo Ma')Ir~ Inc Maple IS (J y<?glsterc() crademork of Woterloo Maple he Mar)leNet so troc1ema'k of Woter1oc' fV'lop'e Inr PII other trcde,nork$ (ye property o~ their respective ('wners Generic Polynomials Constructive Aspects of the Inverse Galois Problem Christian U.
    [Show full text]
  • Aim-Oriented Empiricism and the ‘Father’ of the Scientific Revolution: Metaphysics and Method in the Work of Galileo
    AIM-ORIENTED EMPIRICISM AND THE ‘FATHER’ OF THE SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: METAPHYSICS AND METHOD IN THE WORK OF GALILEO A Thesis presented by Katherine R. Crawley for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London University College, London July 1998 ProQuest Number: 10609111 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10609111 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS With grateful acknowledgements and thanks to Nick Maxwell, for his unfailing support, and to Rob Iliffe, particularly for his valuable help with Chapter One. In addition I would like to express my gratitude to Geoff, Vicky, and Drew for all their love and encouragement. 2 ABSTRACT This thesis is concerned with that branch of the history of science which takes as its central problem the question of scientific progress, defined as the growth of knowledge and understanding about the world. It is an area of enquiry which has been suppressed, in recent years, by the development of historical methodologies which eschew all epistemological deliberations and their established ramifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Logic Vs Illogic: Why Mathematics Is Easy and Life Is Hard
    Logic vs illogic: why mathematics is easy and life is hard Eugenia Cheng University of Cambridge 1st March, 2004 Approximate text of a talk given to the Trinity Mathematical Society, Cambridge, on 1st March 2004 and to the University of Chicago Mathematics Club on 14th February 2005. Abstract Generations of even well-educated adults are under the delusion that mathematics is difficult, and that mathematicians must therefore be very clever. In this talk I will explode this myth and show that mathematics is in fact easy, and moreover that mathematics is precisely “that which is easy” for an appropriate sense of ‘easy’. We will take ‘easy’ to mean ‘attainable by logical thought processes’. As a corollary, or a converse, or a contrapositive or something, we will discuss the importance of illogical thought processes in non-mathematical life and the fact that life is thus difficult. Hence or otherwise we will deduce that mathematics is not life, nor can it nor should it be. 1 Introduction It is a fact universally acknowledged that mathematics is difficult. If you tell someone you’re a mathematician you invariably get one of two answers. Either “Oh, I never could understand maths” or “Wow, you must be really clever.” Of course, since mathematics is difficult it does follow that we mathematicians must all be very clever. As a mathematician, I am quite tempted to believe this. But is it true? What I’m going to do today is take the bold step – perhaps rash step – of exploding the Myth of Mathematics. A bit like the Masked Magician whose TV show explained how magic tricks work – with the result that he was vilified by the Magical community.
    [Show full text]
  • Russell's Second Philosophy of Time (1899–1913)
    Russell’s Second Philosophy of Time (1899–1913) Nikolay Milkov, Bielefeld, Germany 1. Introduction 3. The History of Russell’s Seconds Russell’s second philosophy of time (1899–1913), which Philosophy of Time will be the subject of this paper, is of special interest for Though idealistic, Russell’s philosophy was pluralistic from two reasons. (1) It was basic to his New Philosophy, later the very beginning. His motivation for accepting pluralism called the “philosophy of logical atomism”. In fact, this were two early beliefs of his: First, in order for thinking to philosophy didn’t initially emerge in the period of 1914– be possible at all, its object must be complex. Indeed, a 1919, as many interpreters (e.g. A. J. Ayer) suggest, but simple thing “is unthinkable, since every object of thought with the introduction of Russell’s second philosophy of time can only be thought by means of some complexity”. (1896, (and space). The importance of Russell’s second philos- 564) Secondly, this complexity can be achieved only when ophy of time for his early and middle philosophy can be referring to unique individuals (terms), which are different seen from the fact that it survived the dramatic changes in from any other individual. This was the kernel of Russell’s his philosophy of August–December 1900, and of July atomism.1 1905. There is of course no surprise about this point: it served as their fundament. (2) Russell’s second philos- Thus Russell’s The Foundations of Geometry ophy of time is a locus classicus of all so called B-theories (finished in October 1896) claimed that the objects of of time which define it in terms of the relations of before, cognition have to be complex: in order to know them, we after and simultaneous between events or moments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Absolute Theory of Time Is Intimately Connected With
    The Absolute and the Relational Theories of Space and •rime 1. ·rhe Absolute Theory of Space and Time ; The absolute theory of time is intimately connected with the absolute theory of space, which is to be found first, in 1 clear terms, in Newton's conception of space and time. In Newton • s theory space and time are real indepe~dent entities; each of them constitutes a continuum such that any one part of that continuum is indistinguishab~e from any such other part. The different parts of space and time are due to the things that occupy place and. the events. that happen at moments; they are not due to space apd time themselves. Both space and time are absolutely immutable and homogeneous. · The basic attributes of space and time follow 1 from their h01rogenei ty : "their irtde·pendence from physical contents, their uniformity, continuity and infinity. As 7 space is independent of rnatter, time is also independent in regard to the concrete c.'langes that take place in it. 'I'his has been explicitly formulated by Newton in the following sentences : 11 Absolute, true and mathematical >cime of itself and by its ·own nature flows uniformly, without regard to anything external. It is called duration. Relative, apparent and vu.lgax- time is sane sensible and external measure of absolute time (duration), estimated by the motions of bodies ••• , and is c~m~nly .ll.s.~d .i~stead of true time, 11 2 such as· an hour, a day, a month a week • According to this theory time flows irrespective of the events or changes occurring or not in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalized Epistemology, Or What the Strong Programme Can't Explain
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 36 (2005) 135–148 www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsa Naturalized epistemology, or what the Strong Programme canÕt explain Karyn L. Freedman University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada, N1G 2W1 Received 26 September 2003; received in revised form 5 April 2004 Abstract In this paper I argue that the Strong ProgrammeÕs aim to provide robust explanations of belief acquisition is limited by its commitment to the symmetry principle. For Bloor and Barnes, the symmetry principle is intended to drive home the fact that epistemic norms are socially constituted. My argument here is that even if our epistemic standards are fully natu- ralized—even relativized—they nevertheless can play a pivotal role in why individuals adopt the beliefs that they do. Indeed, sometimes the fact that a belief is locally endorsed as rational is the only reason why an individual holds it. In this way, norms of rationality have a powerful and unique role in belief formation. But if this is true then the symmetry principleÕs emphasis on Ôsameness of typeÕ is misguided. It has the undesirable effect of not just naturalizing our cognitive commitments, but trivializing them. Indeed, if the notion of ÔsimilarityÕ is to have any content, then we are not going to classify as Ôthe sameÕ beliefs that are formed in accor- dance with deeply entrenched epistemic norms as ones formed without reflection on these norms, or ones formed in spite of these norms. My suggestion here is that we give up the sym- metry principle in favor of a more sophisticated principle, one that allows for a taxonomy of causes rich enough to allow us to delineate the unique impact epistemic norms have on those individuals who subscribe to them.
    [Show full text]