7 Contents Studies and Articles
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Analele UniversităŃii din Craiova. Istorie, Anul XXI, Nr. 2(30)/2016 CONTENTS STUDIES AND ARTICLES B.E. Kumekov, A.B. Sagandykova, T.E. Mukhazhanova, G.E. Sabdenova, R.S. Myrzabekova, GENEALOGICAL MYTHS AND PROBLEMS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF ANCIENT TURKIC PEOPLES .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Leskaly Bazargalievich Berdyguzhin, NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE HISTORY OF THE KAZAKH KHANATE FORMATION ...................................................................................................... 17 Rahilya Geybullayeva, INTERPRETATION OF SACRIFICE IN THE CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................ 27 Alexandra Deaconu, Veronica GheorghiŃă, EMERGENCE AND SPREAD OF CHRISTIANITY WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF OLTENIA DURING THE 4 TH -6TH CENTURIES .................... 37 Mariana Borcoman, HISTORICAL AND IDENTITY LANDMARKS IN TRANSYLVANIA (A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN SIGHIŞOARA, MUREŞ COUNTY AND RUPEA, BRAŞOV COUNTY) ...................................................................................................................................... 45 Stoica Lascu, THE BALKAN ROMANIANS IN REPORTS OF SOME ROMANIAN TRAVELERS (1882-1914) ............................................................................................................................ 61 Cosmin-Ştefan Dogaru, THE GOVERNMENT ALTERNATION BETWEEN THE NATIONAL-LIBERAL PARTY AND THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY: A FUNDAMENTAL TOPIC REFLECTED IN THE ROMANIAN PRESS (1895-1914) ............... 77 Natalia Aleksandrovna Portnyagina, Olga Alexeevna Patrikeeva, “CHOOSE ONE OF TWO: THE DUMA OR THE GRAVE”: THE IMPACT OF TERRORISM ON THE ELECTIONS TO THE STATE DUMA IN THE PERIOD OF THE FIRST RUSSIAN REVOLUTION .......................... 87 Abiodun Akeem Oladiti, Samuel Ajibade Idowu, THE INTERPLAY OF TOWN PLANNING AND COLONIALISM: THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF ALBERT THOMPSON TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN LAGOS, 1920-1945 .............................................................................................107 Alexandra Porumbescu, THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO INTERNATIONAL SECURITY IN THE EUROPEAN POST-COMMUNIST SPACE ..........................................................................119 Marina A. Shpakovskaya, Mihaela-Alexandra Vezuină, RUSSIA – EUROPEAN UNION RELATIONS UNDER THE IMPACT OF THE UKRAINIAN CRISIS ........................................127 Bujar Dugolli, Bardhok Bashota, COHABITATION BETWEEN SUPRANATIONALISM AND INTERGOVERNMENTALISM IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE .............................................................................................................................................137 Anca Parmena Olimid, PROPOSING AN ANALYTICAL BORDER CONTROL- ASSEMBLAGE MODEL (BCAM) TO EXPLAIN EU MOTIVATIONS TO COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS AND DECISIONS GOVERNING THE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS ACROSS BORDERS AND ADDRESSING THE REFUGEE CRISIS (2014-2016) ....................155 7 Analele UniversităŃii din Craiova. Istorie, Anul XXI, Nr. 2(30)/2016 BOOK REVIEWS Stoica Lascu, Melek Fetisleam (eds.), Contemporary Research in Turkology and Eurasian Studies. A Festschrift in Honor of Professor Tasin Gemil on the Occasion of His 70 th Birthday (Babeş-Bolyai University. The Institute of Turkology and Central-Asian Studies), Cluj-Napoca, Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2013 [2015], lxxviii+1.056 pp.; ill., maps, tables. ISBN 978-973-595-622-6 (Costel Coroban)........167 Gabriel Stelian Manea, Un adulter în familia comunistă. România şi SUA în anii ’60 [An Adultery in Communist Family. Romania and USA in the 60s.] (AsociaŃia pentru Dialog Intercultural şi Studii Istorice INTERMARIUM), Târgovişte, Editura Cetatea de Scaun, 2016, 336 pp. ISBN 978-606-537- 190-3 (Stoica Lascu) ........................................................................................................................................170 Gareth Stedman Jones, Karl Marx. Greatness and Illusion , Allen Lane an imprint of Penguin Books (part of Penguin Books Random House UK), [London], 2016, 750 pp., ill., maps. ISBN 978-0-713- 99904-4 (Stoica Lascu) ...................................................................................................................................171 Ioan Scurtu, Corneliu Mihail Lungu, Istoria AsociaŃiei Oamenilor de ŞtiinŃă din România [History of Association of Romanian Scientists], vol. II: 1956-1996 , Bucureşti, RAO DistribuŃie [and] Editura Academiei Oamenilor de ŞtiinŃă din România, 2016, 360 pp.; il., facs. ISBN 978-606-8516-11-0; 978-606-8636-21-4 (Stoica Lascu) ...............................................................................................................173 8 Analele UniversităŃii din Craiova. Istorie, Anul XXI, Nr. 2(30)/2016 STUDIES AND ARTICLES GENEALOGICAL MYTHS AND PROBLEMS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF ANCIENT TURKIC PEOPLES B.E. Kumekov *, A.B. Sagandykova ** , T.E. Mukhazhanova *** , G.E. Sabdenova **** , R.S. Myrzabekova ***** Abstract In the article the main problem of origin of ancient Turkic peoples which is actual and disputable at present day is investigated. This research is carried out on the basis of genealogical myths from ancient sources. The history of origin of the certain ethnos is always connected with myths and legends. Based on similar texts, researchers reveal information, necessary for the research, which is not recorded in historical treatises. The first Turkic folklore monument recorded by Chinese historiographic tradition (in writing) in the 6th century and reflected an early stage of Turkic ethnogenesis are genealogical legends of the tribe Ashina origin and its appeal to the dominating group of the Turkic tribal union appearance. Key words : Ashina , ethnic processes , empire , “Turkic”, myth According to Klyashtorny S.G. to the middle of the 6th century there is a stage of ethnic history based on the conclusion of the political union of relative ancient Turkic tribes, the head of which was the family created by Turkic-Ashiny. Then the ethnic term Turkic turns into the general politonym, designating all steppe population subjected to creators of the First Turkic khaganate (551-630). Also as Klyashtorny S.G. (2006) notes, formation of the territorial political unions into khaganates (Turkic, Uigur); the karluk, tyurgeshy, oguz, Kyrgyz, kimak and kipchak states, predetermined the main territorial location displaced to the West side and weakening of ethnic processes in the Middle Asia where consolidation of the Mongolian tribes results in superiority at this territory followed. * Professor, PhD, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Department of Eurasian Researches, 2 Satpaeva Str., Astana, Phone: +77172 709500, Email: [email protected] ** PhD, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Department of Kazakhstan History, 71 Al-Farabi Ave., Almaty, Phone: 8(727)221-10-00, Email: [email protected] *** Associate Professor, PhD, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Department of World History, Historiography and Sources, 71 Al-Farabi Ave., Almaty, Phone: 8(727)221-10-00, Email: [email protected] **** Associate Professor, PhD, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Department of World History, Historiography and Sources, 71 Al-Farabi Ave., Almaty, Phone: 8(727)221-10-00, Email: Gulmı[email protected] ***** Associate Professor, PhD, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Department of World History, Historiography and Sources, 71 Al-Farabi Ave., Almaty, Phone: 8(727)221-10-00, Email: [email protected] 9 Analele UniversităŃii din Craiova. Istorie, Anul XXI, Nr. 2(30)/2016 In the developed “empire” it should be noted that the material and spiritual culture carries on the traditions (relative language, writing, customs, the uniform socio-political nomenclature, etc.) as well as the processes connected with political and territorial claims and trade cultural ties introduces the changes in ethnocultural processes. In researches of Gumilev L.N. (1967) reasoning is given, that not all tribal families entering the conglomerate of Turkic community were Turkic peoples by origin. After a number of the events connected with disintegration of the Turkic khaganate, the name “Turkic” does not disappear. The etymological “Turkic” value extended to considerable territories of the Asian continent further is modified in the name of a language family. So many people never entering a great khaganate of the 6-7th centuries (for example, the Turkmen, the Osmans, the Azerbaijanians, the Balkars and the Chuvashs, etc.) became “Turkic peoples” (Tulebayev, 2011). But even that widespread linguistic interpretation which is nowadays given to the term “Turkic” has a certain basis under itself: ancient Turkic peoples most brightly realized those beginnings of steppe culture which ripened in hunnes time and were in the condition of anabiosis in hard times of the III-Vth centuries. Complex forms of social being and social institutes of the Turkic: ale, specific ladder system, hierarchy of ranks, military discipline, diplomacy, and also existence of accurately fulfilled outlook opposed to ideological systems of neighboring countries (Gumilev, 1967). Klyashtorny, S.G. (2006) in his judgements expresses quite different opinion, having characterized the unity of “The Turkic language type”; it reveals ethnopsychological imperatives which at the subconscious level appear in everyday life of most of the Turkic people. Speaking about the unity of Turkic