DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

No Healing Here Violence, Discrimination and Barriers to Health for Migrants in South Africa Copyright © 2009 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-579-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org December 2009 1-56432-579-2 No Healing Here Violence, Discrimination and Barriers to Health for Migrants in South Africa Map of South Africa ............................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 2 Abuses Leading to Health Vulnerability .......................................................................... 6 Violence ................................................................................................................... 6 Living Conditions ...................................................................................................... 6 Barriers to Accessing Health Care .................................................................................... 7 Discrimination ........................................................................................................... 7 Inadequate and Inaccurate Information .................................................................... 8 Barriers to emergency care for rape survivors ........................................................... 9 Extra-legal User Fees ................................................................................................ 9 Key Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 11 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 12 Background .......................................................................................................................14 Migrants in South Africa ................................................................................................ 14 Zimbabweans .......................................................................................................... 15 Rights of asylum seekers and refugees .......................................................................... 16 Internally Displaced Non-Citizens .................................................................................. 21 Health Rights of Migrants in South Africa ...................................................................... 23 Health Vulnerabilities of Migrants to South Africa ............................................................ 26 Communicable Diseases ............................................................................................... 27 HIV .......................................................................................................................... 27 Tuberculosis ........................................................................................................... 29 Cholera ................................................................................................................... 30 Violence ........................................................................................................................ 31 Sexual and Gender Based Violence ......................................................................... 35 Shelter/Living Conditions ............................................................................................. 39 Urban refugees, asylum seekers and undocumented migrants ............................... 40 Formal and Informal Camps .................................................................................... 43 Food insecurity ............................................................................................................. 48 Barriers to Obtaining Health care ..................................................................................... 54 Discrimination ............................................................................................................... 54 Inadequate and Inaccurate Information ........................................................................ 60 Barriers to care for rape survivors ................................................................................. 63 User Fees ...................................................................................................................... 66 Legal Rights ..................................................................................................................... 73 Domestic Law ................................................................................................................ 73 International Law .......................................................................................................... 76 The Right to Health ................................................................................................. 76 Non-discrimination ................................................................................................. 78 Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 81 To the South African Human Rights Commission............................................................ 81 To the South African Department of Health .................................................................... 81 To the South African Department of Home Affairs ......................................................... 83 To the South African Department of Social Development .............................................. 84 To the South African Government ................................................................................. 84 To the South African Police Service ............................................................................... 84 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ 86 Annex 1: Email Correspondence with the Department of Health, Republic of South Africa .. 87 Map of South Africa ©2007 United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations. 1 Human Rights Watch | December 2009 Executive Summary “There is no healing here in South Africa. Since I arrived here there is no rest, no recovery.” — Ndona, Congolese refugee, Johannesburg Ndona speaks for the many thousands of migrants in South Africa who were made homeless by xenophobic attacks in 2008, forced to take shelter in unsafe and unsanitary camps, abandoned buildings, churches, and on open ground, where they are vulnerable to disease and further violence. Refugees like Ndona fleeing war in places like the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Somalia and economic and political crises in places like Zimbabwe, have found themselves without the most basic human rights fundamental to life: food, shelter, physical security, and access to basic health care. As shocking as the severity of the xenophobic violence is the fact that such widespread abuses are tolerated in South Africa, a country with some of the most expansive rights in the world for refugees and other migrants. The widespread violence and displacement leading to homelessness and unsafe living conditions, along with systemic government failures to protect migrants from arrest and deportation, has created a massive health crisis for migrants—and their hosts—in South Africa. Xenophobia, violence, and discrimination create both environments that promote risks to migrants’ health as well as barriers to obtaining basic health care. South Africa's Constitution provides for the right to health for “everyone” within the country. In recent years, this provision has been tested as regional crises created unprecedented numbers of asylum seekers and undocumented migrants entering there. Since 2007 the Department of Health (DOH) has repeatedly affirmed the rights of asylum seekers and refugees to access the same public health care to which citizens have access. However during this same period, documented and undocumented migrants alike have been denied access to health care. Even when seeking emergency care after xenophobic attacks or rapes, migrants are often turned away by medical personnel who may discharge them prematurely, harass them, charge them excessive user fees, and call the police to deport them. But the risks to health and barriers to care that migrants experience in South Africa are not the responsibility of the DOH alone. The South African asylum system has failed for years to provide protection to asylum seekers and recognized refugees due to systematic problems. Restrictive immigration provisions leave many labor migrants, long
Recommended publications
  • Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration

    Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration

    12 NOVEMBER 2018 – DAY 21 COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO STATE CAPTURE HELD AT PARKTOWN, JOHANNESBURG 10 21 NOVEMBER 2018 DAY 21 20 Page 1 of 124 12 NOVEMBER 2018 – DAY 21 PROCEEDINGS HELD ON 12 NOVEMBER 2018 CHAIRPERSON: Good morning Mr Pretorius. Good morning everybody. ADV PAUL PRETORIUS SC: Morning Chair. CHAIRPERSON: Thank you. ADV PAUL PRETORIUS SC: Today Ms Barbara Hogan will be led by Advocate Mokoena. CHAIRPERSON: Thank you. Before, Mr Mokoena before you do that, I just want to attend to one matter that I want to deal with and basically it relates to the media statement that the Commission issued on Thursday. I want to read this media 10 statement again and make an appeal to the public and to the media to please respect the processes of the Commission and to abide by the law. The statement reads: “Since the commencement of the public hearings of the Commission in August 2018, various sections of the media have disseminated and published contents of witnesses statements submitted to the Commission in connection with the inquiry the Commission before witnesses give evidence before the Commission and without the written permission of the Chairperson. The latest incident relates to the statement submitted to the 20 Commission by Minister Pravin Gordhan, Minister of Public Enterprises. The same thing also happened with the statement submitted to the Commission by former minister of Public Enterprises, Ms Barbara Hogan. Both minister Gordhan and Ms Hogan are yet to give evidence before the Commission. An investigation is to be conducted
  • South Africa's Anti-Corruption Bodies

    South Africa's Anti-Corruption Bodies

    Protecting the public or politically compromised? South Africa’s anti-corruption bodies Judith February The National Prosecuting Authority and the Public Protector were intended to operate in the interests of the law and good governance but have they, in fact, fulfilled this role? This report examines how the two institutions have operated in the country’s politically charged environment. With South Africa’s president given the authority to appoint key personnel, and with a political drive to do so, the two bodies have at times become embroiled in political intrigues and have been beholden to political interests. SOUTHERN AFRICA REPORT 31 | OCTOBER 2019 Key findings Historically, the National Prosecuting Authority The Public Protector’s office has fared (NPA) has had a tumultuous existence. somewhat better overall but its success The impulse to submit such an institution to ultimately depends on the calibre of the political control is strong. individual at its head. Its design – particularly the appointment Overall, the knock-on effect of process – makes this possible but might not in compromised political independence is itself have been a fatal flaw. that it is felt not only in the relationship between these institutions and outside Various presidents have seen the NPA and Public Protector as subordinate to forces, but within the institutions themselves and, as a result, have chosen themselves. leaders that they believe they could control to The Public Protector is currently the detriment of the institution. experiencing a crisis of public confidence. The selection of people with strong and This is because various courts, including visible political alignments made the danger of the Constitutional Court have found that politically inspired action almost inevitable.
  • Presentation of National Orders Osefako Makgatho Presidential Guesthouse R Pretoria Tuesday, 8 December 2015

    Presentation of National Orders Osefako Makgatho Presidential Guesthouse R Pretoria Tuesday, 8 December 2015

    AWARD CEREMONY NATIONAL ORDERS National Orders 2015_inside_REV2.indd 1 2015/11/27 9:51 AM Order of Proceedings PRESENTATION OF NATIONAL ORDERS OSEFAKO MAKGATHO PRESIDENTIAL GUESTHOUSE R PRETORIA TUESDAY, 8 DECEMBER 2015 1. Nominees for the National Orders and guests take their seats 2. Arrival of the His Excellency President Jacob Zuma 3. Rendition of the South African National Anthem and the African Union Anthem 4. Word of welcome by the Programme Director 5. Ceremonial oration by the Grand Patron of National Orders 6. Investiture of the National Orders • THE ORDER OF MENDI FOR BRAVERY • THE ORDER OF IKHAMANGA • THE ORDER OF THE BAOBAB • THE ORDER OF LUTHULI • THE ORDER OF THE COMPANIONS OF OR TAMBO 7. The President, the Chancellor and recipients of National Orders proceed to the credentials room for a photo opportunity 8. The President, Chancellor and recipients of National Orders return to the Banquet hall for Luncheon Grand Patron of National Orders His Excellency President Jacob Zuma Chancellor of National Orders Dr Cassius Lubisi The Advisory Council on National Orders Ms Brigitte Mabandla; Mr Mandla Langa; Dr Glenda Gray; Dr Molefi Oliphant; Dr Lindiwe Mabuza; Prof Malegapuru Makgoba; Ms Mary Burton; Ms Sally Padayachie; Rev Buti Tlhagale; Mr James Motlatsi; Dr Fazel Randera and Ms Nothembi Mkhwebane. ii National Orders 2015_inside_REV2.indd 2 2015/11/27 9:51 AM Recipients THE ORDER OF MENDI FOR BRAVERY THE ORDER OF LUTHULI RBRONZE BRONZE 1. Jetro Ndlovu 18. Kay Moonsamy SILVER SILVER 2. Joseph Morolong (posthumous) 19. William Henry Frankel 3. Caleb Motshabi (posthumous) 20. Johnson Malcomess Mgabela 4.
  • IMPEDIMENTS in the PROMOTION of the RIGHT to GENDER EQUALITY in POST- APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA by NOMTHANDAZO PATIENCE NTLAMA Subm

    IMPEDIMENTS in the PROMOTION of the RIGHT to GENDER EQUALITY in POST- APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA by NOMTHANDAZO PATIENCE NTLAMA Subm

    IMPEDIMENTS IN THE PROMOTION OF THE RIGHT TO GENDER EQUALITY IN POST- APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA by NOMTHANDAZO PATIENCE NTLAMA submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of: DOCTOR OF LAWS at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: PROF. A E A M THOMASHAUSEN JUNE 2010 Student number: 43205321 I declare that ‘IMPEDIMENTS IN THE PROMOTION OF THE RIGHT TO GENDER EQUALITY IN POST-APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA’ is my own work and that all sources that I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. SIGNATURE: MS NP NTLAMA Date: June 2010 i ABSTRACT The adoption of the 1996 Constitution in recognition of the historic imbalances that South Africa inherited from its past, affirms the commitment to the promotion of human rights including the right to equality. The emphasis on the right to equality in the Constitution and other related laws discussed in the study represents a guarantee for both men and women the right to equal treatment and benefit of the law. The point of departure is based on the premise that views the law as an instrument that has the potential to effect social change. The primary purpose is to determine various factors that are an impediment to the significance of the law for the promotion of the right to gender equality. The objective is to establish with sufficient certainty the substantive conception of the right to gender equality in post-apartheid South Africa. This dissertation examines and provides a brief overview of the development and the intersection of the principles of non-discrimination at the international and regional spheres and their influence in broadening the scope for enforcement of gender equality in South Africa.
  • The Youth Book. a Directory of South African Youth Organisations, Service Providers and Resource Material

    The Youth Book. a Directory of South African Youth Organisations, Service Providers and Resource Material

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 432 485 SO 029 682 AUTHOR Barnard, David, Ed. TITLE The Youth Book. A Directory of South African Youth Organisations, Service Providers and Resource Material. INSTITUTION Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria (South Africa). ISBN ISBN-0-7969-1824-4 PUB DATE 1997-04-00 NOTE 455p. AVAILABLE FROM Programme for Development Research, Human Sciences Research Council, P 0 Box 32410, 2017 Braamfontein, South Africa; Tel: 011-482-6150; Fax: 011-482-4739. PUB TYPE Reference Materials - Directories/Catalogs (132) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC19 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Developing Nations; Educational Resources; Foreign Countries; Schools; Service Learning; *Youth; *Youth Agencies; *Youth Programs IDENTIFIERS Service Providers; *South Africa; Youth Service ABSTRACT With the goal of enhancing cooperation and interaction among youth, youth organizations, and other service providers to the youth sector, this directory aims to give youth, as well as people and organizations involved and interested in youth-related issues, a comprehensive source of information on South African youth organizations and related relevant issues. The directory is divided into three main parts. The first part, which is the background, is introductory comments by President Nelson Mandela and other officials. The second part consists of three directory sections, namely South African youth and children's organizations, South African educational institutions, including technical training colleges, technikons and universities, and South African and international youth organizations. The section on South African youth and children's organizations, the largest section, consists of 44 sectoral chapters, with each organization listed in a sectoral chapter representing its primary activity focus. Each organization is at the same time also cross-referenced with other relevant sectoral chapters, indicated by keywords at the bottom of an entry.
  • Part 3: Programme Performance

    Part 3: Programme Performance

    PART 3: PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE 58 Annual Report 2003/04 Department of Foreign Affairs, South Africa Department of Foreign Affairs, South Africa Annual Report 2003/04 59 PART 3: Programme Performance To be appropriated by Vote R 2 243 555 000 Statutory appropriations - Responsible Minister Minister of Foreign Affairs : Dr Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma Administering Department Department of Foreign Affairs Accounting Offi cer Director-General: Dr A Ntsaluba AIM OF THE VOTE The Department of Foreign Affairs is respon- Programme 2: Foreign Relations Programme 3: Public Diplomacy sible for the formulation, co-ordination, im- Purpose: Promote relations with foreign and Protocol plementation and management of South countries, and participate in international Purpose: Promote an understanding, both Africa’s foreign policy and international re- organisations and institutions, in pursuit of domestically and internationally, of South lations programmes throughout the world. South Africa’s national values and foreign Africa’s role and position in international policy objectives. relations, and provide protocol services. KEY PROGRAMMES AND OBJECTIVES Measurable objective: To promote South Measurable objective: To project a positive Africa’s foreign policy internationally and image of South Africa by marketing the Programme 1: Administration within multilateral institutions, through dip- Department’s programmes and providing Purpose: Conduct the overall policy devel- lomatic interventions to strengthen foreign protocol services. opment and management of the Depart- relations. ment. 58 Annual Report 2003/04 Department of Foreign Affairs, South Africa Department of Foreign Affairs, South Africa Annual Report 2003/04 59 Programme 4: Foreign Properties - building the economy and creating of action for its practical implementation Purpose: Provide secure, economical hous- jobs; and is the host to the NEPAD secretariat.
  • The Struggle for the Rule of Law in South Africa (Symposium: Twenty Years of South African Constitutionalism: Constitutional

    The Struggle for the Rule of Law in South Africa (Symposium: Twenty Years of South African Constitutionalism: Constitutional

    digitalcommons.nyls.edu Faculty Scholarship Articles & Chapters 2016 The trS uggle for the Rule of Law in South Africa (Symposium: Twenty Years of South African Constitutionalism: Constitutional Rights, Judicial Independence and the Transition to Democracy) Stephen J. Ellmann New York Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation 60 N.Y. L. Sch. L. Rev. 57 2015-2016 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles & Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. 0OUM .0 1205 .1 STEPHEN ELLMANN 'The Struggle for the Rule of Law in South Africa 60 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REv. 57 (2015-2016) ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Stephen Ellmann is Martin Professor of Law at New York Law School. The author thanks the other presenters, commentators, and attenders of the "Courts Against Corruption" panel, on November 16, 2014, for their insights. THE STRUGGLE FOR THE RULE OF LAW IN SOUTH AFRICA I. INTRODUCTION The blight of apartheid was partly its horrendous discrimination, but also its lawlessness. South Africa was lawless in the bluntest sense, as its rulers maintained their power with the help of death squads and torturers.' But it was also lawless, or at least unlawful, in a broader and more pervasive way: the rule of law did not hold in South Africa. Apartheid, as was often
  • Government Communication and Information

    Government Communication and Information

    33 Pocket Guide to South Africa 2008/09 GOVERNMENT of the injustices of the country’s non-democratic past. of theinjusticescountry’s mined –that werecarriedoutwithanacuteawareness negotiations –difficultbutdeter- detailed andinclusive Constitutionwastheresultofremarkably Africa’s South Pocket Guide to South Africa 2008/09 GOVERNMENT The Constitution is the supreme law of the country. No other law or government action may supersede its provisions. The Preamble to the Constitution states that its aims are to: sHEALTHEDIVISIONSOFTHEPASTANDESTABLISHASOCIETYBASEDON democratic values, social justice and fundamental human rights sIMPROVETHEQUALITYOFLIFEOFALLCITIZENSANDFREETHEPOTENTIAL of each person sLAYTHEFOUNDATIONSFORADEMOCRATICANDOPENSOCIETYINWHICH GOVERNMENTISBASEDONTHEWILLOFTHEPEOPLEANDEVERYCITIZEN ISEQUALLYPROTECTEDBYLAW sBUILDAUNITEDANDDEMOCRATIC3OUTH!FRICAABLETOTAKEITSRIGHT- ful place as a sovereign state in the family of nations. Government Government consists of national, provincial and local spheres. The powers of the legislature, executive and courts are separate. Parliament Parliament consists of the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces (NCOP). Parliamentary sittings are open to the public. Several measures have been implemented to make Parliament more accessible and accountable. The National Assembly consists of no fewer than 350 and no more than 400 members, elected through a system of proportional representa- tion for a five-year term. It elects the President and scrutinises the executive. National Council of Provinces The NCOP consists of 54 permanent members and 36 special delegates, and aims to represent provincial interests in the national sphere of government. The Presidency The President is the head of state and leads the Cabinet. He or she is elected by the National Assembly from among its members, and leads the country in the interest of national unity, in accord- ance with the Constitution and the law.
  • Of the National Prosecuting Authority Act 32 of 1998

    Of the National Prosecuting Authority Act 32 of 1998

    JMC-001 ENQUIRY IN TERMS OF SECTION 12(6) OF THE NATIONAL PROSECUTING AUTHORITY ACT 32 OF 1998 ENQUIRY IN TERMS OF SECTION 12(6) OF THE NATIONAL PROSECUTING AUTHORITY ACT 32 OF 1998 UNABRIDGED VERSION 1 APRIL 2019 1 JMC-002 ENQUIRY IN TERMS OF SECTION 12(6) OF THE NATIONAL PROSECUTING AUTHORITY ACT 32 OF 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF WITNESSES .............................................................................................................. 5 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... 10 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 12 1.1. Establishment of the Enquiry ............................................................................ 12 1.2. The Terms of Reference .................................................................................... 14 1.3. Rules of the procedure ...................................................................................... 17 1.4. Invitation to submit evidence and the need for cross-examination ................... 20 1.5. The structure of the report ................................................................................. 20 2. THE PROSECUTING AUTHORITY: IT’S LEGAL FRAMEWORK ................................ 22 3. THE STRUCTURE OF THE NPA .................................................................................

  • By Melissa Romy Levin, 2017

    Unimagined Communities: Post-Apartheid Nation-Building, Memory and Institutional Change in South Africa (1990-2010) by Melissa Romy Levin A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Melissa Romy Levin, 2017 Unimagined Communities: Post-Apartheid Nation-Building, Memory and Institutional Change in South Africa (1990 – 2010) Melissa Romy Levin Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2017 ii Abstract Studies of nationalism and nation-states insist that the construction of usable pasts is central to the creation of national solidarities and the very identity of a nation. The memory/nation nexus is taken for granted in scholarship on nation-building. However, this scholarship is limited by the scant attention that is paid to how those pasts are constructed, or what the mechanisms are through which decision-making occurs. The results of this neglect are often abstracted assumptions that presume a voluntarism and coherence that most often does not exist. Repeatedly, studies focus on the products of memorialization which generates a tendency to impose consistency and statist intentionality, after the fact, on what is a contingent, messy and complicated process. In addition, studies often assume a singularity of power, located in an unfragmented state, with authoritarian capacity to produce meaning. This dissertation remedies these flaws by paying attention to the processes and procedures through which memorialization and nation-building are constructed. It focuses specifically on post-Apartheid South Africa where these processes are currently unfolding. It examines the context of South Africa’s transition, which has produced multiple continuities with and changes from Apartheid institutions.

  • Government Communication and Information System (Government Communications) Is Primarily Responsible for Facilitating Communication Between Government and Citizens

    GCIS pock_(06) Govern * 30/1/07 14:26 Page 33 Government South Africa’s Constitution was the result of remarkably detailed and inclusive negotiations – difficult but determined – that were carried out with an acute awareness of the injustices of the country’s non- democratic past. On 8 May 2006, President Thabo Mbeki addressed a joint sitting of Parliament to mark the 10th anniversary of South Africa’s Constitution, which is one of the most progressive in the world and has been acclaimed internationally. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. No other law or government action may supersede its provisions. The Preamble to the Constitution states that its aims are to: • heal the divisions of the past and establish a society based on democratic values, social justice and fundamental human rights • improve the quality of life of all citizens and free the potential of each person • lay the foundations for a democratic and open society in which government is based on the will of the people and every citizen is equally protected by law • build a united and democratic South Africa able to take its rightful place as a sovereign state in the family of nations. Government Government consists of national, provincial and local spheres. The powers of the legislature, executive and courts are separate. Parliament Parliament consists of the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces (NCOP). Parliamentary sittings are open to the public. Several measures have been implemented to make Parliament more accessible and accountable. The National Assembly 33 GCIS pock_(06) Govern * 30/1/07 14:26 Page 34 consists of no fewer than 350 and no more than 400 members elected through a system of proportional representation for a five- year term.
  • The African National Congress and Gay Liberation in South Africa

    The African National Congress and Gay Liberation in South Africa

    University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository UF Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2019 Roots of Revolution: The African National Congress and Gay Liberation in South Africa Joseph S. Jackson University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Joseph S. Jackson, Roots of Revolution: The African National Congress and Gay Liberation in South Africa, 44 Brook. J. Int'l L. 613 (2019) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UF Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ROOTS OF REVOLUTION: THE AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS AND GAY LIBERATION IN SOUTH AFRICA Joseph S. Jackson* INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 614 I. THE ANC’S CONSTITUTIONAL GUIDELINES: COMMITMENT TO MULTI-PARTY DEMOCRACY AND AN ENFORCEABLE BILL OF RIGHTS .................................................................................... 617 A. January 1986: “The end of apartheid is not very far away.” ............................................................................................. 617 B. Bourgeois Democracy or People’s Power? ....................... 622 C. What Kind of