Arxiv:1904.00383V1

Home , Polariton

arXiv:1904.00383v1 [quant-ph] 31 Mar 2019 os[ tors n h hrnvCse ffc [ effect Aharonov-Casher the ing oooia ui n u ui,o ehnclos- mechanical a or qubit, flux [ a a cillator between and coupling qubit strong topological the super- allows the of which route function conductors, wave potential microscopic One the controlling proposed. con- is been the quantum have over- to hybrid ones To qubits ventional of topological MFs. the types coupling the several operate architectures of problems, to states these challenging quantum come still quan- the is for readout it required and gates (ii). logic complete computation; quantum a tum universal generate that cannot of known well MFs set is of it operations (i). braiding considerable: techni- are the challenges However, ro- cal extreme fluctuations. their local to against due bustness computation quantum for dates os ute xeietldmntain r eddto needed are demonstrations experimental further cols, [ effect Josephson [ qubits spin the con- and as be qubits such can ones, flux conventional qubits the the Majorana with integrating the by that trolled shown been has it [ interactions spin-orbit 13 strong [ with 5/2 wires quantum factor ing filling at states Hall technology. and include science realizations proposed quantum The for platform triguing sec fMshv enrpre [ reported been have MFs ex- Re- the of establishing splitting. istence at Zeeman aiming experiments the to several cently, supercon- and predicated the effect are between proximity competition ducting MFs the the through nanowire, For localize quantum architectures. simple 1D their the for are interests superconductivity particular proximity-induced of with wires tor nrcn er [ interest years great recent attracted have in systems matter condensed ∗ [email protected] oooia uisaeoeo h otpoiigcandi- promising most the of one are qubits Topological .I hs ytm,tesi-ri ope semiconduc- coupled spin-orbit the systems, these In ]. aoaaFrinqaiatce Ms elzdin realized (MFs) quasiparticles Fermion Majorana 6 nefcn oooia ui ihasi ui nahybrid a in qubit spin a with qubit topological a Interfacing ,egso Dtplgclisltr [ insulators topological 2D of edges ], 24 – 26 1 hog aksaepooo.Ti okpoie promisin interesti a find provides can and work computation. qubit, This and spin conventional the protocol. and state qubit int dark to allows resonator a which mechanical simultaneously, through qubit the spin of the mode and center qubit torsional (NV) the nitrogen-vacancy that, single show We a with nanowire ductor hax rvneKyLbrtr fQatmIfrainand Information Quantum of Laboratory Key Province Shaanxi .Ohrpoiigshmsicueutiliz- include schemes promising Other ]. 2 epeetadaayeahbi unu ytmta interfac that system quantum hybrid a analyze and present We eateto hsc n srnm,Pru nvriy We University, Purdue Astronomy, and Physics of Department .INTRODUCTION I. 1 oLi, Bo 30 – 5 eateto ple hsc,X’nJatn University, Jiaotong Xi’an Physics, Applied of Department – ,bcuete rvd eyin- very a provide they because ], 32 .S a,fralo hs proto- these of all for far, So ]. ,2 1, egB Li, Peng-Bo 8 27 ,ad1 semiconduct- 1D and ], p – x 29 18 14 + ,o h fractional the or ], – – ip 23 17 1, y ]. ∗ .Meanwhile, ]. superconduc- 7 unZhou, Yuan ,quantum ], Dtd pi ,2019) 2, April (Dated: 9 – 1 i Liu, Jie ain[ mation ue yteMgeoJspsneet[ in- effect Magneto-Josephson couplings the topology-torsion by duced strong the couplings. with spin-torsion Together strong the an with combine center nan- This to NV isolated us single-walled attached. enables magnet structure individual nano-size mechanical nanoscale a an with by (SWNT) otube realized can- is torsional the tilever Here heterostructure. superconductor uispsessamjrosal o hi coupling. of their kinds for two obstacle these major a between promising How- possesses mismatch qubits a energy computation. provide the quantum will ever, for spins, platform NV complete multi-qubit the of with operations freedom of gate degrees Integrat- interface topological coherently. to the centers appealing ing NV very with be qubits will topological it systems, quantum ldsmcnutrnnwr,wihi meddo top on an embedded cou- is of spin-orbit which a topological nanowire, in The semiconductor realized pled center is cantilever. NV consideration under single torsional qubit a magnetized with a qubit via topological a interfacing unu oi ae fN pn,teewl emr po- more architecture. be hybrid will this there utilizing spins, applications to NV tential Owing of universal gates the protocol. logic and dark-state quantum robustness a protected via topologically qubit the qubit coherent spin enables Majorana the the This and between Ma- center. conversion the NV states both the quantum to and couple qubit strongly jorana can mode torsional ical [ gates coherence [ long temperature their room and at to detection, even due time and attractive preparation manipulation, microwave more optical fast the as are such features, unique diamond in centers feasibility. their verify nhbi unu ytm,alwn h rprto of preparation [ the states allowing quantum fantastic systems, centers quantum NV hybrid integrate to in effort considerable been has there nti ae,w osdrahbi unu device quantum hybrid a consider we paper, this In o h ovninlqbt,ntoe-aac (NV) nitrogen-vacancy qubits, conventional the For 1 raete o unu tt conversion state quantum for them erface s 42 gapiain nqatminformation quantum in applications ng wv uecnutrt omasemiconductor- a form to superconductor -wave ogRn Li, Hong-Rong 47 – i antzdtrinlcantilever. torsional magnetized a via 46 a togycul oteMajorana the to couple strongly can – nefc ewe h topological the between interface g 52 ,adsoaeo rnfro unu infor- quantum of transfer or storage and ], unu polcrncDevices, Optoelectronic Quantum .T ute xlr h oeta fhybrid of potential the explore further To ]. saMjrn-otdsemicon- Majorana-hosted a es tLfyte N497 USA 47907, IN Lafayette, st ia 109 China 710049, Xi’an 1 n uL Li Fu-Li and 36 – unu system quantum 41 ,dsg fqatmlogic quantum of design ], 33 – 35 1 .I eetyears, recent In ]. 53 ,temechan- the ], 2

II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE by the annihilation and creation operators

1 θˆ iLˆ 1 θˆ iLˆ ˆb = ( + ), ˆb† = ( ), (1) As shown schematically in Fig. 1, the hybrid quantum 2 θzpf Lzpf 2 θzpf − Lzpf device under consideration consists of a topological qubit realized in a Majorana-hosted semiconductor nanowire, a where Lzpf = ℏIzωm/2 and θzpf = ℏ/(2Izωm) de- magnetized torsional cantilever, and a single NV center. note the zero pointp fluctuations of the torsionalp mode. The MFs in this architecture are realized in a spin-orbit coupled semiconductor nanowire with proximity-induced superconductivity. This 1D quantum nanowire could be A. MFs in 1D semiconductor nanowire driven to the topological phase regime, and the MF exists as a quasiparticle at the boundary between the topolog- We first describe the 1D quantum nanowire hosting ical (T) and non-topological (N) regions [9–12]. Here we MFs. As shown in Fig. 1, the semiconductor nanowire is divide the semiconductor nanowire into three sections to embedded on the top of an s-wave superconductor, and form a TNT junction [11, 32], and define the topologi- an external magnetic field ~b = b~ez along the z axis is cally protected MFs asγ ˆ1/2/3/4. applied. There are two nanomagnets positioned straight In this setup, the magnetized torsional cantilever is above the nanowire: one is stationary in the left region, realized by a nanomagnet with dimensions (l,w,t) sus- and the other is free to vibrate in the right region. We pended on a SWNT. Specifically, the individual SWNT assume that the magnetic fields induced by the two mag- ~ works as a torsional spring and mechanical support, nets is in the xy plane, i.e., B = B cos θ~ex + B sin θ~ey. which allows the suspended nanomagnet to rotate along We further use the angular displacement of the torsional the tube (z) axis (see Fig. 1). Without loss of generality, cantilever to denote the relative field angle, which implies θ = θ θ . we assume that the nanomagnet can only rotate along r − l the z axis with a small amplitude, then the Hamiltonian The single-particle effective Hamiltonian for the semi- 2 2 1 2 2 Lˆ conductor wire reads H0 =p ˆ /2m∗ µ+bσˆz α(~σˆ ~pˆ) zˆ of the torsional cantilever reads Hm = Izω θˆ + , 2 m 2Iz [9], where m , µ, b, and α are the− effective mass,− × chem-· ˆ ˆ ∗ where ωm, Iz, L, and θ are the torsional frequency, mo- ical potential, longitudinal magnetic field, and Rashba ment of inertia, angular momentum, and angular dis- spin-orbit coupling strength, respectively. As a result placement, respectively. Similar to the canonical conju- of the proximity effect, the Cooper pairs tunnelling ˆ ˆ gate observable X and P of the center of mass mode, the into the nanowire can be described by the Hamiltonian rotational degree of freedom can be quantized [54], and iφ iφ HSC = ∆e ψˆ†(x)ψˆ†(x)+H.c., with ∆e the proximity- the motion of the torsional cantilever can be described induced gap. We↑ now↓ introduce the Nambu spinor basis T Ψˆ = (ψˆ , ψˆ , ψˆ†, ψˆ†), and model the 1D semiconductor nanowire↑ ↓ with↓ − a Bogoliubov-de↑ Gennes Hamiltonian ℏ2k2 NV Center H = τˆz + αkτˆzσˆz µτˆz + ∆(cos φτˆx sin φτˆy ) 2m∗ − − bσˆz + B(cos θσˆx sin θσˆy), (2) Torsional cantilever − − where the Pauli matricesσ î andτ î represent the spin and Fixed Magnet Magnet particle-hole sectors, respectively. As shown in Ref. [53], this semiconductor nanowire ¤ ¤４ ¤ ３ can be driven to the topological phase regime when ２ T ¤ Semiconductor N 2 2 2 2 1 T Substrate ∆ b < B µ , and to the non-topological phase VG regime− when ∆−2 b2 > B2 µ2 (considering only − − Superconductor y ∆2 > b2). Note that Refs. [55, 56] give the simi- x lar results. In particular, the Bogoliubov operators of z the quantum nanowire take a general form asγ ˆk = ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ uk ψk + uk ψk + vk ψ† k + vk ψ† k . For Majorana ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ↑ − ↑ ↑ − ↓ FIG. 1. (Color online) Schematic of a hybrid quantum device operators that satisfyγ ˆk† =γ ˆk, they may only occur in the momentum inversion symmetric condition k k, interfacing a Majorana qubit and a single NV center via a ≡ − magnetized torsional cantilever. The spin-orbit coupled semi- i.e., k = 0. In the quantum nanowire, this indicates a conductor nanowire is embedded on top of an s-wave super- phase boundary between the T and N regions [57]. conductor, and is divided into three regions to form a TNT The exactly zero-energy Majorana modes exist only junction. The MFsγ ˆ1/2/3/4 appear at the boundaries between in the ideal case where the two MFs possess an infinite the T and N regions. And for the torsional cantilever, the in- distance. For a finite nanowire, the MFs gain a small dividual SWNT works as a torsional spring for the suspended energy as a result of the weak overlap of their wave func- nanomagnet. tions. However, the wave functions are still well localized 3 at the boundaries, and we still haveγ ˆ† γˆ in general. ≃ 0.04 0.04

a Therefore, these MFs with nonzero energies can still be b

utilized to encode quantum information. We now denote 0.03 0.03

| | the lengths of the three nanowire sections as l , then | | l/m/r 2 1 the MFs in the 1D semiconductor nanowire can be de- 0.02 0.02 scribed by an eﬀective low energy Hamiltonian

0.01 0.01

HˆT P = iElγˆ1γˆ2 + iEm(θ)ˆγ2γˆ3 + iErγˆ3γˆ4, (3)

0.00 0.00

100 200 300 400 500 0 100 200 300 400 500 where El, Em(θ), and Er are the coupling energies be-

Length (n) Length (n) (nA) tween the adjacent MFs. ( eV) 10

20 E ( ) J

m B. Magneto-Josephson eﬀect m

0 0

To perform quantum information processing with the -20 topological degree of freedom, different ways to manipu- -5 late the MFs have been studied [58–62]. One potential -40 -10 route is to utilize the fraction Josephone effect [63, 64]. 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 Different from the conventional Josephson effect that allows tunneling by Cooper pairs only, the fraction Jose- 2 FIG. 2. (a). Edge modes |φ ε1 | of the lattice model, cor- phone effect supports single electron tunneling [32], and ± 2 respond to MFsγ ˆ1 andγ ˆ4. (b). Edge modes |φ ε2 | of the possess a 4π-periodic coupling energy [65]. Moreover, it ± lattice model, correspond to MFsγ ˆ2 andγ ˆ3. (c). Hybridiza- has been shown that the Magneto-Josephson effect can tion energy Em(θ) as a function of the relative field angle θ. be used to realize the coherent coupling between the Ma- (d). The spin current Jm induced by the Magneto-Josephson jorana qubit and the magnetized torsional cantilever [53]. effects. In particular, the spin current induced by the Magneto- Josephson effect serves as a mechanical torque acting on the nanomagnet, which leads to the strong topology- We conduct numerical simulations by considering a 1D torsion coupling. lattice model with 500 grid sites (300, 20, and 180 sites For the TNT junction realized in the semiconductor for the left, middle, and right regions, respectively). Here nanowire, both the superconducting phases and the mag- the energy eigenvalues of the system are denoted as εi, ± netic fields have contributions to the fractional Joseph- with the corresponding eigenstates φ εi . As shown in | ± i son effects. These contributions can be analysised by Figs. 2(a) and (b), the eigenstates φ ε1 correspond to | ± i the magnetism-superconductivity duality: if we inter- the excitations ofγ ˆ1 andγ ˆ4, while the eigenstates φ ε2 i | ± i change the magnetic terms b, B, θ, σˆ with the super- correspond to the excitations ofγ ˆ2 andγ ˆ3. Theoretically, conducting terms µ, ∆, φ, τî{, the Hamiltonian} (2) takes the isolated MFs can be obtained by combinations of { } the same form [55]. In a general case, the coupling these eigenstates in the limit ε1,2 0, i.e., φγ1,4 = 1 1 ≃ | i interaction betweenγ ˆ2 andγ ˆ3 takes form as EM ( φ 1 φ 1 ), and φ 2 3 = ( φ 2 φ 2 ). √2 ε ε− γ , √2 ε ε− 0 θl θr φl φr ∝ | i ± | i | i | i ± | i EM cos( −2 ) cos( −2 )[57]. In our system, we set the Induced by the overlap of the edge states, the coupling superconducting phases as the constants (i.e., φl = φm = energy between MFs decays exponentially with the sepa- φr), then the coupling energy Em can be tuned by chang- ration [66]. According to Ref. [53], we now estimate the ing the relative field angle θ. coupling energy Em(θ) through the lowest order pertur- To study the Magneto-Josephson effect in the TNT bation theory, and obtain junction, we now map the Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamil- θl θr tonian (2) to the tight-binding model 0 i σˆz i σˆz 0 φ e− 2 H e 2 φ E (θ) |h γ2 | | γ3 i|. (5) ˆ m H = t cîσ† cî+1σ + ( 2t + µi + biσ)ˆciσ† cîσ ≈ φ0 φ0 φ0 φ0 − X X − q γ2 γ2 γ3 γ3 i,σ i,σ h | ih | i Then, we observe a 4π-periodic dependence between E + α (ˆci,† cî+1, cî,† cî+1, + H.c.) (4) m X ↑ ↓ − ↓ ↑ i and θ, as shown in Fig. 2(c). We also calculate the iφ iθ spin current passing through the middle region as Jm = + (∆e cî,† cî,† + H.c.)+ (Be cî† cî, + H.c.). ∂Em(θ) X ↑ ↓ X ↑ ↓ (e/~) [67], and the result is shown in Fig. 2(d). i i ∂θ The relevant parameters are based on InSb quantum ~2 2 For this lattice version, t = /(2m∗a ) is the nearest- wires, i.e., m∗ = 0.015 me, α = 0.2 eVA˚, a = 10 nm, neighbor hopping strength, a is the lattice spacing con- ∆=0.5 meV, and gµB = 1.5 meV/T. Other parame- stant, α is the spin-orbit coupling strength, bi / = b ters include B = 200 mT, b = 200 mT and µ = 0 for ↑ ↓ ± is the Zeeman splitting, andc îσ (ˆciσ† ) is the annihilation the topological regions, and B = 0, b = 200 mT and (creation) operator of an electron with spin σ = ( ). µ = 0.6 meV for the non-topological region. Note that ↑ ↓ − 4 these parameters could be further optimized. ax b |+1 ǈ c |-1 ǈ Δ NV Center Δ + |e ǈ - ω z ed C. Topology-torsion couplings y , h |d ǈ B B Ω Ω θ

We now discuss the coherent coupling between the ωdg Majorana qubit and the torsional motion. Firstly, we |g ǈ combine the MFs to construct two conventional Dirac fermions, and obtain fˆl = (ˆγ1 + iγˆ2)/2 and fˆr = (ˆγ3 + iγˆ4)/2. Then, the two quantum states of the Dirac fermions, corresponding to the number of electrons on FIG. 3. (Color online) Schematic design and level diagram either side of the Josephson junction, can function as of a single NV center coupled to a magnetized torsional can- a physical topological qubit. These two states are de- tilever. (a). The NV center is located straight above the ˆ ˆ magnetized torsional cantilever. The projection of the mag- noted asn ˆx = fx†fx = 0or1(x = l, r), with par- † netic field along the spin component is changed if the torsional fˆ fˆx ity Pˆx = ( 1) x = 1. As braiding operations can cantilever rotates, leading to the strong spin-torsion coupling. − ± not change the total parity Pˆ = PˆlPˆr of the system, (b). Simplified energy levels of the NV center in the electronic 3 four MFs are usually needed to define a logical topo- ground state | A2i. (c). Dressed spin states in the presence logical qubit [24, 30]. We now define the topological of external driving magnetic fields. qubit in the odd parity subspace, and obtain φ = | T P i c1 0 l 1 r + c2 1 l 0 r. For this topological qubit, we also have| i [|32i] | i | i the spin component is changed, resulting in a magnetic coupling between the torsional mode and the NV cen- z x z iγˆ1γˆ2 σˆT P ,iγˆ2γˆ3 σˆT P ,iγˆ3γˆ4 σˆT P . (6) ter. The strong magnetic coupling can be achieved by →− →− → exquisite preparation of the dressed spin states. In this setup, it is the θ dependence of the hybridiza- An NV center in diamond consists of a substitutional tion energy Em(θ) that leads to the strong topology- nitrogen atom replacing a carbon atom and an adjacent torsion coupling [53]. In particular, by expanding Em(θ) vacancy. The electronic ground states of a single NV in Eq. (3) around θ0 to the first order, we arrive at center are spin triplet states denoted as ms = 0, 1 , ∂Em(θ) ˆ ˆ | ± i Em(θ) = Em(θ0)+ ∂θ θzpf (b† + b). In what follows, and the zero-field splitting Dgs between the degenerate we consider the case in which Em(θ0) 0 (see Fig. 2 (c)), sublevels ms = 1 and ms =0 is 2π 2.87 GHz. For then the Hamiltonian of the topology-torsion≃ dynamics moderate| applied± magnetici | fields,i static× magnetic field has the form B~ z = Bz~ez causes Zeeman splitting of the states ms = ~ | ˆ ℏ ˆ ˆ ℏ z ℏ ˆ ˆ x 1 , while external microwave field Bdr = B0 cos ω0t~ex HTor T P = ωmb†b + ωT P σˆT P g(b† + b)ˆσT P , (7) ± i − − polarized in the x direction drives the states ms = 0 | i ℏ 1 ∂Em(θ) and ms = 1 , as shown in Fig. 3(b). For convenience, where ωT P = (Er El)/ , and g = ℏ ∂θ θzpf | ± i is the topology-torsion− coupling strength. By tuning we denote as the z axis the crystalline axis of the NV the hybridization energy E and E , we can steer the center. l r ~ topology-torsion coupling to the near-resonance condi- The magnetic field Bmg(θ) induced by the suspended nanomagnet depends on the angular displacement θ. We tion ωT P ωm. Under the rotation-wave approximation, the topology-torsion≃ dynamics can be described by assume that the NV center is placed in the position where B~ (θ) is along the x axis, i.e., B~ (θ)= B cos θ ~e + mg mg mg · x Bmg sin θ ~ez, and θ 0. Then, the interaction of the ˆ ℏ ˆ ˆ ℏ z ℏ ˆ ˆ + · ≃ HTor T P = ωmb†b+ ωT P σˆT P g(b†σˆT− P +bσˆT P ). (8) NV center with the total magnetic fields (external driving − − and from the nanomagnet) can be described by

ˆ D. Spin-torsion couplings Hˆ = ~D Sˆ2 + g µ [(B~ (θ)+ B~ ) S~ + B Sˆ ], (9) NV gs z e B mg dr · z z

We now take into consideration the couplings between where ge = 2 is the NV landéfactor, µB = 14MHz the mechanical torsional mode and the single NV cen- 1 ˆ mT− is the Bohr magneton, and S~ = (Sˆx, Sˆx, Sˆz) is ter. Before proceeding, we note that coherent interac- the spin operator of the NV center. The motion of tions between NV centers and several types of mechani- the torsional cantilever attached with the nanomagnet cal resonators have been studied [68, 69]. These mechan- produces an angular and time dependent magnetic field ical resonators include clamped cantilevers [70], optically B~ (θ) ∂ B~ (θ)θˆcos ω t, which result in a spin- trapped nano-diamond crystals [71–73], suspended car- int ∼ θ mg m ˆ ~ ~ˆ bon nanotubes [74], etc. In this setup, the single NV torsion coupling interaction Hint = geµBBint(θ) S · ≃ center is positioned straight above the magnetized tor- ℏλ(ˆb† + ˆb)Sˆz cos ωmt, where the coupling constant λ = sional cantilever, as shown in Fig. 3(a). When the nano- geµBBmgθzpf /ℏ is proportional to the magnetic field magnet rotates, the projection of the magnetic field along Bmg and the zero-point angular extension θzpf . In the 5 rotating frame at the frequency ωm, we can acquire the III. EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERS Hamiltonian to describe the spin-torsion dynamics According to the Hamiltonian (8) and (14), the whole ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ HˆTor NV = ℏωmb†b + HˆNV + ℏλ(b† + b)Sˆz. (10) system can be described by − ˆ ℏ z ℏ ˆ ˆ ℏ z Note that the far-off resonant interactions between the Hsys = ωT P σˆT P + ωmb†b + ωNV σˆNV NV spin and the static and low frequency components of ℏ ˆ ℏ ˆ g(t)b†σˆT− P + λe(t)b†σˆNV− + H.c.. (15) magnetic fields along the x axis can be ignored. In the − basis defined by the eigenstates of Sˆ , i.e., m ,m = The first three terms describe the free Hamiltonian of the z {| si s 0, 1 , with Sˆz ms = ms ms , we have system, while the last four terms describe two JC interac- ± } | i | i tions: one between the torsional mode and the topologi- Hˆ = [~D m2 + g µ (B + B sin θ)m ] m m cal qubit, and the other between the torsional mode and NV X gs s e B z mg s | sih s| the single NV center. As the torsional cantilever couples m s to the Majorana qubit and the NV center simultaneously, ˆ ′ ′ + geµBB0 cos ω0t ms Sx m ms m , (11) it is possible to work as a quantum interface for quantum X h | | si| ih s| msms′ state conversion. Let us discuss the dynamics of the system in a real- where Sˆ = ℏ ( 0 +1 + 0 1 +H.c.). In the rotating- istic situation. For this setup, the relaxation (Γ ) and x √2 | ih | | ih− | 1 frame at the driving frequency ω0 and under the rotating- dephasing (Γ2) of the Majorana qubit, the decay of the wave approximation, we get mechanical resonator (γm), and also the dephasing of the NV center (γs) should be taken into consideration. As a HˆNV = ℏ∆+ +1 +1 + ℏ∆ +1 +1 + result, the full dynamics of this system can be described | ih | −| ih | ℏΩ( 1 0 + +1 0 + H.c.) (12) by the following master equation |− ih | | ih | dρˆ(t) i ˆ z where ℏ∆ = ℏDgs geµB(Bz Bmg sin θ) ℏω0, and = [Hsys, ρˆ]+ γs (ˆσNV ) ± dt −ℏ D √2 ± ± − ℏΩ= geµBB0. + 4 +Γ1 (ˆσT− P )+Γ2 (ˆσT P σˆT− P ) (16) In the following we consider the symmetric detuning D D +(nth + 1)γm (ˆb)+ nthγm (ˆb†), condition ∆+ = ∆ = ∆ for simplicity (e.g., Bz 0). D D − → We now define the bright spin state b = ( +1 + ℏωm/kB T 1 | i | i |− where nth = (e 1)− is the thermal phonon 1 )/√2 and the dark spin state d = ( +1 1 )/√2. − i | i | i−|− i number at the environment temperature T , and (ô)= Then we find that the Hamiltonian (12) couples the 1 1 D oˆρôˆ† 2 oˆ†oˆρˆ 2 ρôˆ†oˆ for a given operatoro ˆ. state 0 to the bright state b , while the dark state d We− now consider− the experimental feasibility of our | i | i ˆ | i remains decoupled. The resulting eigenstates of HNV scheme and the appropriate parameters to achieve strong are therefore given by d and two dressed states g = cos(α) 0 sin(α) b and| ie = sin(α) 0 + cos(α) b ,| withi | i− | i | i | i | i tan(2α)=2√2Ω/∆. The corresponding eigenfrequen- 1.0

2 2 TP cies are given by ωd = ∆, ωe/g = (∆ √∆ + 8Ω )/2, as

± Tor illustrated in Fig. 3(c). 0.8 In the dressed state basis g , d , e , the Hamilto- NV nian (10) can be rewritten as{| i | i | i} 0.6

0.4 HˆTor NV = ℏωmˆb†ˆb + ℏωeg e e + ℏωdg d d +

− | ih | | ih | Occupation ℏ ˆ ˆ

(λ g d + λ d e + H.c.)(b† + b), 0.2 g| ih | e| ih | (13)

0.0

0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 where λg = λ sin(α) and λe = λ cos(α). We further

g t/

− 0 adjust the values of B0 to drive the system to the resonance condition ω ω ω , and then the far-off- ed m dg FIG. 4. (Color online) Rabi oscillations of the hybrid tripar- resonance state g can≃ be neglected.≪ Under the rotating- | i tite system interfacing a topological qubit (TP) and a single wave approximation, the spin-torsion dynamics can be NV center (NV) via a magnetized torsional cantilever (Tor). described by the JC interaction Hamiltonian The topological qubit is initially in state |1i, while the torsional mode is initially in the ground state and the NV center ˆ ℏ ˆ ˆ ℏ z ℏ ˆ ˆ + HTor NV = ωmb†b + ωNV σˆNV + λe(b†σˆ− + bσˆ ), in the state |di. We consider the system in a realistic case, − NV NV (14) with the coupling parameters g = λg = g0 ∼ 2π × 200 kHz, + z and the decay parameters Γ1 = Γ2 = 0.05g0, γm = 0.0002g0 , whereσ ˆNV− = d e , σˆNV = e d ,σ ˆNV = e e d d , and ω = ω | ihω| . | ih | | ih | − | ih | nth = 104, and γs = 0.1g0. NV e − d 6 couplings. This manuscript employs the magnetized tor- actions for quantum state conversion. In particular, this sional cantilever to interface the Majorana qubit and the direct-transfer scheme usually includes two steps: step conventional spin qubit. As an alternative, one may also 1, turn on the topology-torsion couplings g for a time π use the edge states of topological insulators or the planar t1 = 2g (while λe = 0), to transfer the quantum state Josephson junctions [75] to realize the Majorana qubit, from the Majorana qubit to the torsional mode; step 2, which requires weaker magnetic fields. For the magne- turn off g and turn on the spin-torsion couplings λe for a tized torsional cantilever, the nanomagnet suspended on time t = π (while g = 0), to map the quantum state 2 2λe the single-walled nanotube has a size of 80 40 20 nm3, from the torsional mode to the spin qubit. Note that 33× ×2 and a moment of inertia of I 4.8 10− kgm with re- this direct-transfer scheme has been studied in optome- ∼ × spect to the tube axis [76]. Then the torsional cantilever chanical system [80]. In our setup, the topology-torsion 1 has a resonance frequency ω = [ 1 ][( K ) 2 ] 2π 4 couplings g can be controlled by the electrostatic gates m 2π I ∼ × MHz, and an angle of zero point fluctuations θzpf = [58], while the spin-torsion couplings λe can be controlled 2 1/4 5 18 (ℏ /KI) 3 10− , with K 3 10− Nm per radin by the external driving fields. the torsional∼ spring× constant of∼ the× tube axis. As shown As the direct-transfer scheme may suffer from decoher- in Fig. 2(c), the topology-torsion coupling energy is about ence of the mechanical mode, here we propose to realize Em(θ 0) 42 µ eV, which implies a coupling constant the coherent quantum state conversion via a dark-state g 2π≃ 200∼ kHz. Moreover, the spin-torsion coupling protocol [81–83]. This dark-state protocol is particularly can∼ be× modified by the distance between the torsional robust against mechanical dissipations, as it decoupled cantilever and the NV center. For a distance h 80 nm, from the vibrational mode. We proceed by assuming that ∼ one can obtain B 80 mT [77] and λ 2π 200 ωm ωT P ωNV . To describe quasiparticles formed by mg e ≃ ≃ kHz. ∼ ∼ × combinations of spin and Majorana excitations, we now We now take the decoherence processes of the system introduce two polariton operatorsc ˆbr = sin(β)ˆσT− P + into consideration. In practical situations, the relaxation cos(β)ˆσ− , andc ˆdk = cos(β)ˆσ− + sin(β)ˆσ− , with NV − T P NV and dephasing rates of Majorana qubit are strongly de- tan(β) = g/λe. Then, one can verify that the Hamil- − pended on the concrete realization, and here we take tonian (15) can take a compact form Γ1 Γ2 2π 10 kHz [58, 78]. When it comes to the me- ˆ ℏ ℏ ℏ ≃ ∼ × Hsys = ω˜+cˆ+† cˆ+ + ω˜ cˆ† cˆ + ω˜dkcˆdk† cˆdk, (17) chanical damping, the recent fabrication of carbon nan- − − − otube resonators can possess quality factors exceeding wherec ˆ = (1/√2)(ˆcbr ˆb) describe polarons formed by 5 ± ± 10 . For a torsional cantilever with ωm 2π 4 MHz, the combinations of polariton and phonon excitations. The mechanical damping rate is about γ =∼ω /Q× 2π 40 m m ∼ × corresponding frequencies of the polarons areω ˜d = ωm, Hz, and the the thermal phonon occupation number is 2 2 ω˜ = ωm λe + g . We refer toc ˆdk as the mechani- about n 104 at the temperature of T 20 mK. As ± ± p th ∼ ∼ cally dark polariton operator, as it involves the spin and for the NV center, the dephasing time T2 as long as sev- Majorana operations only, decoupled from the torsional eral milliseconds can be reached in ultrapure diamond mode. [79], and here we take γ 2π 2 kHz. Finally, with s ∼ × The excitation ofc ˆdk means the system remains in the these realistic parameters, we perform numerical simula- mechanically dark state. Utilizing the adiabatic evolu- tions for the quantum dynamics of the system by solving tion of the dark state, we can transfer the quantum state the master equation (16). As shown in Fig. 4, the coher- from the topological qubit to the single NV center. In ent interactions can dominate the decoherence processes particular, in the limit β =0, we getc ˆdk = σˆT− P , while in this hybrid quantum device, which enables the system − in the limit β = π/2, we getc ˆdk =σ ˆNV− . This implies, to enter the strong coupling regime. if we adiabatically rotate the mixing angle β form zero to π/2, the mechanically dark polaritonc ˆdk would evolve from σˆT− P toσ ˆNV− . At the same time, the quantum IV. DARK STATE CONVERSION state of− the topological qubit could be transferred to the iπ spin qubit except for a phase factor e− . In the previous sections, it is shown that the mag- Similar to the well-known stimulated Raman adiabatic netized torsional cantilever can be employed as an in- passage, the dark state protocol can be implemented by termediary to link the topological qubit and the single an adiabatic passage approach. To transfer the quan- NV center. Utilizing this quantum interface, one of the tum state from the topological qubit to the NV center, applications is to transfer the quantum state from the we initially make λe(t) larger than g(t), but keep g(t) topological qubit to the spin qubit. The efficiency of the finite. Then, we modulate the coupling parameters care- transformation relies on the specific protocol for quan- fully so that the dark polariton operator evolves adia- tum state conversion. To transfer quantum state in this batically from σˆT− P at the beginning toσ ˆNV− at the setup, we show that both the direct-transfer scheme and end. Meanwhile,− the quantum state of the topological the dark-state protocol are available. qubit will be transferred to the NV center as the system As shown in Eq. (15), this hybrid tripartite system can evolves. To satisfy the adiabatic conditions, one need to be modeled by a beam-splitter Hamiltonian composed of modulate the coupling strengths slowly to ensure that two JC interactions. Therefore, we can use the JC inter- the system adiabatically follows the dark polaritons. 7

1.0 1.0 is slowly transferred to the NV center spin in the conver-

a b sion process. Then, when it turns to the realistic case, 0.8 0.8

TP TP high ﬁdelities 0.83 and 0.93 can be reached, as shown in

0.6 0.6

Tor Tor Figs. 5(b) and 5(d). Therefore, this dark-state protocol

0.4 NV 0.4 NV

Fidelity works very well in practical conditions.

F F Occupation

0.2 0.2

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

g t/ g t/ V. CONCLUSIONS 0 0

1.0 1.0

c d

0.8 0.8

TP In summary, we present a hybrid quantum device in-

0.6 0.6 Tor terfacing a topological qubit and a single NV center via Tor

0.4 0.4 NV a high-Q magnetized torsional cantilever. We show that, Fidelity

F Occupation

0.2 0.2 F the mechanical torsional mode can strongly couple to the Majorana qubit and the single NV center simultane-

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 ously, and then interface them for quantum states con-

g t/ g t/ 0 0 version. In particular, the topology-torsion couplings are induced by the spin currents passing through the TNT FIG. 5. (Color online) Fidelity (F) and occupations junction, while the spin-torsion couplings can be realized (TP,Tor,NV) as a function of time in the dark-state proto- 2 by the exquisite preparation of dressed spin states and (t π) /30 col, with the coupling parameters g(t) = g0e− − , and 2 using a suspended nanomagnet. We also find that, un- t /6 λe(t) = 1.5g0e− . Two kinds of initial states are under con- der resonance conditions, one eigenstate of the system is sideration: (i). a Fock state |1i in (a) and (b); (ii). a superpo- the mechanically dark state, which provides a dark-state sition state 1 |0i+ 1 |1i in (c) and (d). The decoherence pa- √2 √2 protocol for quantum states conversion with very high rameters for (a) and (c) are chosen as Γ1 =Γ2 = γm = γs = 0, fidelities. As the mechanical mode keeps unpopulated and for (b) and (d) Γ1 = Γ2 = 0.05g0, γm = 0.0002g0 , during the conversion process, this dark-state scheme is nth = 104, and γs = 0.1g0. extremely robust against mechanical damping. This hybrid quantum architecture integrated with the topological qubits and NV spins provides a potential platform We perform numerical simulations for the dark-state for quantum information processing. protocol by solving the master equation (16) with Hamil- tonian (15), where the coupling parameters g(t) = 2 2 (t π) /30 t /6 g0e− − , λe(t)=1.5g0e− , and g0 2π 200 kHz as discussed in Sec. III. To test the robustness∼ of× the pro- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS tocol, we consider two kinds of initial states for the topological qubit: a Fock state 1 as displayed in Figs. 5(a) B.L. thanks Di-Hao Sun and Shuai Li for fruitful dis- and 5(b), and a superposition| i state 1 0 + 1 1 as dis- √2 | i √2 | i cussions. This work was support by the NSFC under played in Figs. 5(c) and 5(d). For the ideal case without Grants No. 11774285, 91536115, 11534008, and the Fun- decoherence, high fidelities 0.96, 0.99 can be reached, as damental Research Funds for the Central Universities. shown in Figs. 5(a) and 5(c). We find that, as the sys- Part of the simulations are coded in PYTHON using the tem evolves, the quantum states of the topological qubit QUTIP library [84].

[1] S. R. Elliott and M. Franz, Colloquium: Majorana [4] F. Wilczek, Majorana returns, fermions in nuclear, particle, and solid-state physics, Nature Phys. 5, 614 (2009). Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 137 (2015). [5] D. Litinski and F. von Oppen, Quantum [2] R. M. Lutchyn, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, L. P. Kouwen- computing with Majorana fermion codes, hoven, P. Krogstrup, C. M. Marcus, and Y. Oreg, Majo- Phys. Rev. B 97, 205404 (2018). rana zero modes in superconductor csemiconductor het- [6] N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in erostructures, Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 52 (2018). two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal [3] H. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, S. Gazibegovic, D. Xu, J. A. symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall eﬀect, Logan, G.-Z. Wang, N. van Loo, J. D. S. Bommer, Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267 (2000). M. W. A. de Moor, D. Car, R. L. M. Op het Veld, P. J. [7] L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Superconducting proximity eﬀect van Veldhoven, S. Koelling, M. A. Verheijen, M. Pend- and Majorana fermions at the surface of a topological harkar, D. J. Pennachio, B. Shojaei, J. Sue Lee, C. J. insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008). Palmstrom, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, S. Das Sarma, and [8] C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. L. P. Kouwenhoven, Quantized Majorana conductance, Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quantum Nature 556, 74 (2018). computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008). 8

[9] J. D. Sau, R. M. Lutchyn, S. Tewari, and S. Das Sarma, [27] L. Jiang, C. L. Kane, and J. Preskill, Inter- Generic new platform for topological quantum face between topological and superconducting qubits, computation using semiconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 130504 (2011). Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 040502 (2010). [28] P. Bonderson and R. M. Lutchyn, Topological quan- [10] J. Alicea, Majorana fermions in a tunable semiconductor tum buses: Coherent quantum information trans- device, Phys. Rev. B 81, 125318 (2010). fer between topological and conventional qubits, [11] R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 130505 (2011). Majorana fermions and a topological phase transi- [29] S. Vishveshwara, A bit of both, tion in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures, Nature Phys. 7, 450 (2011). Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 077001 (2010). [30] C. Ohm and F. Hassler, Majorana fermions [12] L. Chen, W. LiMing, J.-H. Huang, C.-P. Yin, coupled to electromagnetic radiation, and Z.-Y. Xue, Majorana zero modes on a one- New J. Phys. 16, 015009 (2014). dimensional chain for quantum computation, [31] A. Cottet, T. Kontos, and B. Dou¸cot, Phys. Rev. A 90, 012323 (2014). Squeezing light with Majorana fermions, [13] Y. Oreg, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Helical liq- Phys. Rev. B 88, 195415 (2013). uids and Majorana bound states in quantum wires, [32] Z.-Y. Xue, M. Gong, J. Liu, Y. Hu, S.-L. Zhu, and Z. D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 177002 (2010). Wang, Robust interface between flying and topological [14] V. Mourik, K. Zuo, S. M. Frolov, S. R. Plis- qubits, Sci. Rep. 5, 12233 (2015). sard, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, and L. P. Kouwen- [33] M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. hoven, Signatures of Majorana fermions in hy- Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, brid superconductor-semiconductor nanowire devices, The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond, Science 336, 1003 (2012). Phys. Rep. 528, 1 (2013). [15] M. T. Deng, C. L. Yu, G. Y. Huang, M. Larsson, [34] S. Hong, M. S. Grinolds, P. Maletinsky, R. L. P. Caroff, and H. Q. Xu, Anomalous zero-bias conduc- Walsworth, M. D. Lukin, and A. Yacoby, Coher- tance peak in a Nb-InSb nanowire-Nb hybrid device, ent, mechanical control of a single electronic spin, Nano Lett. 12, 6414 (2012). Nano. Lett. 12, 3920 (2012). [16] A. Das, Y. Ronen, Y. Most, Y. Oreg, M. Heiblum, and [35] N. Bar-Gill, L. M. Pham, A. Jarmola, D. Bud- H. Shtrikman, Zero-bias peaks and splitting in an Al- ker, and R. L. Walsworth, Solid-state electronic InAs nanowire topological superconductor as a signature spin coherence time approaching one second, of Majorana fermions, Nat. Phys. 8, 887 (2012). Nat. Commun. 4, 1743 (2013). [17] L. P. Rokhinson, X. Liu, and J. K. Furdyna, The [36] K.-Y. Xia and J. Twamley, Generating spin squeez- fractional a.c. Josephson effect in a semiconductor- ing states and Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entangle- superconductor nanowire as a signature of Majorana par- ment using a hybrid phonon-spin ensemble in diamond, ticles, Nat. Phys. 8, 795 (2012). Phys. Rev. B 94, 205118 (2016). [18] F. Hassler, A. R. Akhmerov, C.-Y. Hou, and C. W. J. [37] W. L. Yang, Y. Hu, Z. Q. Yin, Z. J. Deng, and M. Feng, Beenakker, Anyonic interferometry without anyons: Entanglement of nitrogen-vacancy-center ensembles us- how a flux qubit can read out a topological qubit, ing transmission line resonators and a superconducting New J. Phys. 12, 125002 (2010). phase qubit, Phys. Rev. A 83, 022302 (2011). [19] Z.-Y. Xue, S.-L. Zhu, J.-Q. You, and Z.-D. Wang, Imple- [38] X.-X. Li, P.-B. Li, S.-L. Ma, and F.-L. Li, Preparing en- menting topological quantum manipulation with super- tangled states between two NV centers via the damping conducting circuits, Phys. Rev. A 79, 040303 (2009). of nanomechanical resonators, Sci. Rep. 7, 14116 (2017). [20] K. Flensberg, Non-abelian operations on Ma- [39] Y. Zhou, S.-L. Ma, B. Li, X.-X. Li, F.-L. Li, and P.-B. Li, jorana fermions via single-charge control, Simulating the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model in a hybrid Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 090503 (2011). quantum system, Phys. Rev. A 96, 062333 (2017). [21] M. Leijnse and K. Flensberg, Quantum information [40] Z.-Q. Yin, T.-C. Li, X. Zhang, and L.-M. Duan, transfer between topological and spin qubit systems, Large quantum superpositions of a levitated nan- Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 210502 (2011). odiamond through spin-optomechanical coupling, [22] S. Hoffman, C. Schrade, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Uni- Phys. Rev. A 88, 033614 (2013). versal quantum computation with hybrid spin-Majorana [41] Q. Chen, W.-L. Yang, M. Feng, and J.-F. Du, En- qubits, Phys. Rev. B 94, 045316 (2016). tangling separate nitrogen-vacancy centers in a scal- [23] S. Plugge, L. A. Landau, E. Sela, A. Altland, K. Flens- able fashion via coupling to microtoroidal resonators, berg, and R. Egger, Roadmap to Majorana surface codes, Phys. Rev. A 83, 054305 (2011). Phys. Rev. B 94, 174514 (2016). [42] C. Zu, W.-B. Wang, L. He, W.-G. Zhang, C.-Y. Dai, [24] Z.-T. Zhang and Y. Yu, Processing quantum information F. Wang, and L.-M. Duan, Experimental realization of in a hybrid topological qubit and superconducting flux universal geometric quantum gates with solid-state spins, qubit system, Phys. Rev. A 87, 032327 (2013). Nature 514, 72 (2014). [25] Z.-Y. Xue, L. B. Shao, Y. Hu, S.-L. Zhu, and [43] X.-K. Xu, Z.-X. Wang, C.-K. Duan, P. Huang, P.- Z. D. Wang, Tunable interfaces for realizing uni- F. Wang, Y. Wang, N.-Y. Xu, X. Kong, F.-Z. Shi, versal quantum computation with topological qubits, X. Rong, and J.-F. Du, Coherence-protected quantum Phys. Rev. A 88, 024303 (2013). gate by continuous dynamical decoupling in diamond, [26] F.-Y. Hong, H.-Q. Qian, J.-L. Fu, Z.-Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 070502 (2012). and L.-Z. Jiang, Strong coupling between a topo- [44] L.-H. Dong, X. Rong, J.-P. Geng, F.-Z. Shi, Z.- logical qubit and a nanomechanical resonator, K. Li, C.-K. Duan, and J.-F. Du, Scalable quan- Phys. Rev. A 87, 032339 (2013). tum computation scheme based on quantum- 9

actuated nuclear-spin decoherence-free qubits, [63] D. Sticlet, C. Bena, and P. Simon, Josephson effect in su- Phys. Rev. B 96, 205149 (2017). perconducting wires supporting multiple Majorana edge [45] P.-H. Cao, R. Betzholz, S.-L. Zhang, and J.-M. Cai, En- states, Phys. Rev. B 87, 104509 (2013). tangling distant solid-state spins via thermal phonons, [64] H.-J. Kwon, K. Sengupta, and V. M. Yakovenko, Frac- Phys. Rev. B 96, 245418 (2017). tional ac Josephson effect in p- and d-wave superconduc- [46] T. Li, A. Miranowicz, X.-D. Hu, K.-Y. Xia, and tors, Eur. Phys. J. B 37, 349 (2004). F. Nori, Quantum memory and gates using a Λ- [65] D.-H. Sun and J. Liu, Quench dynamics of the type quantum emitter coupled to a chiral waveguide, Josephson current in a topological Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. A 97, 062318 (2018). Phys. Rev. B 97, 035311 (2018). [47] K.-Y. Xia and J. Twamley, Solid-state optical intercon- [66] S. Das Sarma, J. D. Sau, and T. D. Stanescu, nect between distant superconducting quantum chips, Splitting of the zero-bias conductance peak as smok- Phys. Rev. A 91, 042307 (2015). ing gun evidence for the existence of the Majorana [48] W. L. Yang, Z. Q. Yin, Y. Hu, M. Feng, and J. F. mode in a superconductor semiconductor nanowire, Du, High-fidelity quantum memory using nitrogen- Phys. Rev. B 86, 220506 (2012). vacancy center ensemble for hybrid quantum computa- [67] F. Pientka, L. Jiang, D. Pekker, J. Alicea, G. Re- tion, Phys. Rev. A 84, 010301 (2011). fael, Y. Oreg, and F. von Oppen, Magneto-Josephson [49] X.-Y. Lü, Z.-L. Xiang, W. Cui, J. Q. You, and effects and Majorana bound states in quantum wires, F. Nori, Quantum memory using a hybrid cir- New J. Phys. 15, 115001 (2013). cuit with flux qubits and nitrogen-vacancy centers, [68] Z.-Q. Yin, N. Zhao, and T.-C. Li, Hybrid opto- Phys. Rev. A 88, 012329 (2013). mechanical systems with nitrogen-vacancy centers, [50] B. Li, P.-B. Li, Y. Zhou, S.-L. Ma, and F.-L. Li, Quan- Sci. China: Phys., Mech. Astron. 58, 1 (2015). tum microwave-optical interface with nitrogen-vacancy [69] P.-B. Li and F. Nori, Hybrid quantum system centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. A 96, 032342 (2017). with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond coupled to [51] Z.-L. Xiang, X.-Y. Lü, T.-F. Li, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, surface-phonon polaritons in piezomagnetic superlat- Hybrid quantum circuit consisting of a superconducting tices, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 024011 (2018). flux qubit coupled to a spin ensemble and a transmission- [70] P. Rabl, P. Cappellaro, M. V. Gurudev Dutt, L. Jiang, line resonator, Phys. Rev. B 87, 144516 (2013). J. R. Maze, and M. D. Lukin, Strong magnetic coupling [52] J.-B. You, W.-L. Yang, Z.-Y. Xu, A. H. Chan, and between an electronic spin qubit and a mechanical res- C. H. Oh, Phase transition of light in circuit-QED lat- onator, Phys. Rev. B 79, 041302 (2009). tices coupled to nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, [71] Y. Ma, T. M. Hoang, M. Gong, T.-C. Li, and Z.-Q. Yin, Phys. Rev. B 90, 195112 (2014). Proposal for quantum many-body simulation and tor- [53] A. A. Kovalev, A. De, and K. Shtengel, Spin transfer sional matter-wave interferometry with a levitated nan- of quantum information between Majorana modes and a odiamond, Phys. Rev. A 96, 023827 (2017). resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 106402 (2014). [72] T. Delord, L. Nicolas, Y. Chassagneux, and G. Hétet, [54] H. A. Kastrup, Quantization of the canonically con- Strong coupling between a single nitrogen-vacancy spin jugate pair angle and orbital angular momentum, and the rotational mode of diamonds levitating in an ion Phys. Rev. A 73, 052104 (2006). trap, Phys. Rev. A 96, 063810 (2017). [55] L. Jiang, D. Pekker, J. Alicea, G. Refael, Y. Oreg, [73] T. M. Hoang, J. Ahn, J. Bang, and T.-C. Li, Electron A. Brataas, and F. von Oppen, Magneto-Josephson spin control of optically levitated nanodiamonds in vac- effects in junctions with Majorana bound states, uum, Nat. Commun. 7, 12250 (2016). Phys. Rev. B 87, 075438 (2013). [74] P.-B. Li, Z.-L. Xiang, P. Rabl, and F. Nori, Hy- [56] L. Jiang, D. Pekker, J. Alicea, G. Refael, brid quantum device with nitrogen-vacancy cen- Y. Oreg, and F. von Oppen, Unconventional ters in diamond coupled to carbon nanotubes, Josephson signatures of Majorana bound states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 015502 (2016). Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 236401 (2011). [75] A. Fornieri, A. M. Whiticar, F. Setiawan, E. P. Mar´ın, [57] P. Kotetes, G. Schön, and A. Shnirman, Engineering and A. C. C. Drachmann, A. Keselman, S. Gronin, C. manipulating topological qubits in 1D quantum wires, Thomas, T. Wang, R. Kallaher, G. C. Gardner, E. Berg, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 62, 1558 (2013). M. J. Manfra, A. Stern, C. M. Marcus, and F. Nichele, [58] J. Alicea, Y. Oreg, G. Refael, F. von Oppen, and Evidence of topological superconductivity in planar M. P. A. Fisher, Non-abelian statistics and topological Josephson junctions, e-print, rxiv.org/abs/1809.03037. quantum information processing in 1D wire networks, [76] J. C. Meyer, M. Paillet, and S. Roth, Single-molecule Nat. Phys. 7, 412 (2011). torsional pendulum, Science 309, 1539 (2005). [59] S. Vijay, T. H. Hsieh, and L. Fu, Majorana fermion [77] H. J. Mamin, M. Poggio, C. L. Degen, and D. Rugar, Nu- surface code for universal quantum computation, clear magnetic resonance imaging with 90-nm resolution, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041038 (2015). Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 301 (2007). [60] A. Saket, S. R. Hassan, and R. Shankar, Manipulating [78] A. Romito, J. Alicea, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, unpaired Majorana fermions in a quantum spin chain, Manipulating Majorana fermions using supercurrents, Phys. Rev. B 82, 174409 (2010). Phys. Rev. B 85, 020502 (2012). [61] X.-J. Liu and P. D. Drummond, Manipulating Majorana [79] P. L. Stanwix, L. M. Pham, J. R. Maze, D. Le Sage, fermions in one-dimensional spin-orbit-coupled atomic T. K. Yeung, P. Cappellaro, P. R. Hemmer, A. Ya- Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. A 86, 035602 (2012). coby, M. D. Lukin, and R. L. Walsworth, Coherence of [62] X.-J. Liu and A. M. Lobos, Manipulating Majorana nitrogen-vacancy electronic spin ensembles in diamond, fermions in quantum nanowires with broken inversion Phys. Rev. B 82, 201201 (2010). symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 87, 060504 (2013). 10

[80] L. Tian and H.-L. Wang, Optical wavelength con- Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 153604 (2012). version of quantum states with optomechanics, [83] P.-B. Li, Y.-C. Liu, S.-Y. Gao, Z.-L. Xiang, P. Phys. Rev. A 82, 053806 (2010). Rabl, Y.-F. Xiao, and F.-L. Li, Hybrid quantum de- [81] Y.-D. Wang and A. A. Clerk, Using interference for vice based on NV centers in diamond nanomechani- high ﬁdelity quantum state transfer in optomechanics, cal resonators plus superconducting waveguide cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 153603 (2012). Phys. Rev. Appl. 4, 044003 (2015). [82] L. Tian, Adiabatic state conversion and [84] J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip 2: pulse transmission in optomechanical systems, A python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1234 (2013).