Arxiv:2104.14459V2 [Cond-Mat.Mes-Hall] 13 Aug 2021 Rymksnnaeinayn Uha Bspromising Prop- Mbss This As Such Subsequent Anyons Commuting
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Majorana bound states in semiconducting nanostructures Katharina Laubscher1 and Jelena Klinovaja1 Department of Physics, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 82, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland (Dated: 16 August 2021) In this Tutorial, we give a pedagogical introduction to Majorana bound states (MBSs) arising in semiconduct- ing nanostructures. We start by briefly reviewing the well-known Kitaev chain toy model in order to introduce some of the basic properties of MBSs before proceeding to describe more experimentally relevant platforms. Here, our focus lies on simple ‘minimal’ models where the Majorana wave functions can be obtained explicitly by standard methods. In a first part, we review the paradigmatic model of a Rashba nanowire with strong spin-orbit interaction (SOI) placed in a magnetic field and proximitized by a conventional s-wave supercon- ductor. We identify the topological phase transition separating the trivial phase from the topological phase and demonstrate how the explicit Majorana wave functions can be obtained in the limit of strong SOI. In a second part, we discuss MBSs engineered from proximitized edge states of two-dimensional (2D) topological insulators. We introduce the Jackiw-Rebbi mechanism leading to the emergence of bound states at mass domain walls and show how this mechanism can be exploited to construct MBSs. Due to their recent interest, we also include a discussion of Majorana corner states in 2D second-order topological superconductors. This Tutorial is mainly aimed at graduate students—both theorists and experimentalists—seeking to familiarize themselves with some of the basic concepts in the field. I. INTRODUCTION In 1937, the Italian physicist Ettore Majorana pro- posed the existence of an exotic type of fermion—later termed a Majorana fermion—which is its own antiparti- cle.1 While the original idea of a Majorana fermion was brought forward in the context of high-energy physics,2 it later turned out that emergent excitations with re- FIG. 1. A nanowire (blue) placed on a superconducting sub- lated properties can also be constructed in condensed strate (green). The SOI vector α is taken to lie along the z matter systems.3 Of particular interest in this context axis and determines the spin quantization axis. A magnetic are so-called Majorana bound states (MBSs) emerging field B is applied along the x axis such that it is oriented at point-like defects in a special class of superconduct- perpendicularly to the SOI vector. By proximity, the sub- ing systems referred to as topological superconductors strate induces a superconducting pairing of strength ∆sc in the nanowire. In the topological phase [see Eq. (41)], MBSs (TSCs).4–6 These MBSs are characterized by several in- (red) emerge at the wire ends. triguing properties: Firstly, similarly to their high-energy cousins, MBSs can be interpreted as being their own antiparticles in the sense that, in second-quantized lan- guage, the creation and annihilation operator associated potential building blocks for topological quantum com- with an MBS are equal to each other. This also im- puters, where logical gates would then be performed by 14,15 mediately implies that an MBS carries both zero spin exchanging (‘braiding’) anyons. and zero charge. Secondly, MBSs appear at exactly MBSs in condensed matter systems were first pre- zero energy and are separated from other, conventional dicted to occur in the ν = 5/2 fractional quantum Hall quasiparticle excitations by a finite energy gap. For state7 and in superconductors with an exotic spin-triplet this reason, MBSs are also often referred to as Majo- pairing symmetry.8–13,16 Unfortunately, though, mate- arXiv:2104.14459v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 13 Aug 2021 rana zero modes (MZMs) and we will use the two terms rials with intrinsic spin-triplet superconductivity turn interchangeably in the following. Thirdly—and proba- out to be extremely rare. Crucially, it was later re- bly most importantly—it was shown almost two decades alized that an effective spin-triplet pairing component ago that MBSs in a two-dimensional (2D) host mate- can be engineered from a conventional spin-singlet s- rial obey quantum exchange statistics that are neither wave superconductor when combined with a material ex- fermionic nor bosonic.7–13 Rather, MBSs are an exam- hibiting helical bands, i.e., bands with spin-momentum ple of so-called non-Abelian anyons. Loosely speaking, locking.17 With the realization of MBSs now suddenly this means that exchanging two MBSs realizes a non- seeming well within experimental reach, the field has trivial rotation of the many-body ground state within witnessed a veritable explosion. Following the earli- a degenerate ground state subspace, with subsequent est proposals based on proximitized topological insula- such rotations not necessarily commuting. This prop- tor (TI) edge or surface states,17,18 MBSs have subse- erty makes non-Abelian anyons such as MBSs promising quently been proposed to emerge in 2D semiconducting 2 quantum wells19–22 and one-dimensional (1D) semicon- ground state degeneracy of the system. After this in- ductor nanowires with strong Rashba spin-orbit interac- troductory part focusing on a toy model, we turn our tion (SOI),23–26 chains of magnetic adatoms deposited attention to more physical systems. First, in Sec. III, on a superconductor,27–32 TI nanowires,33–35 graphene- we discuss the paradigmatic model of a Rashba nanowire based structures such as carbon nanotubes and nanorib- proximitized by a conventional s-wave superconductor in bons,36–42 planar Josephson junctions,43–47 and many the presence of a magnetic field. We identify the topolog- more. ical phase transition separating the trivial phase from the Due to its expected experimental feasibility, the topological phase with a pair of MBSs at the wire ends, Rashba nanowire model23–26 is one of the most well- demonstrating how the exact MBS wave functions can explored proposals among the above. Here, a semicon- be obtained in the limit of strong Rashba SOI. Further- ducting nanowire with strong Rashba SOI is placed in more, we also introduce the concept of synthetic SOI. In a magnetic field and proximitized by a conventional s- Sec. IV, we then turn our attention to proximitized TI wave superconductor, see Fig. 1. The magnetic field, edge states as an alternative platform for MBSs. We 88,89 in combination with the strong SOI, leads to the emer- introduce the Jackiw-Rebbi mechanism leading to gence of a helical regime with two counterpropagating the emergence of bound states at mass domain walls and bulk modes carrying opposite spin projections. Since all show how this mechanism can be exploited to construct of the required ingredients are in principle readily avail- MBSs. For completeness, we comment on a selection of able in the laboratory, this proposal has triggered sig- other (quasi-)1D platforms hosting MBSs in Sec. V. Fi- nificant experimental activity, culminating in a series of nally, due to their recent interest, Sec. VI is dedicated to works measuring zero-bias conductance peaks consistent 2D higher-order topological superconductors hosting so- with the signatures expected from MBSs.48–58 However, called Majorana corner states. We conclude in Sec. VII. it was soon realized that very similar zero-bias peaks can also appear due to alternative, non-topological mecha- nisms in the absence of MBSs.59–76 As such, irrefutable II. PRELIMINARIES experimental proof of the presence of MBSs has not been obtained up to date. In this section, we introduce some basic notions needed In spite of—or maybe exactly because of—these un- to understand the emergence of Majorana zero modes in resolved issues, the field of MBSs is a highly active and condensed matter systems. The simple ideas developed rapidly evolving research area. The goal of this Tuto- here will frequently reappear throughout the entire Tu- rial is to familiarize graduate students—both theorists torial. and experimentalists—with some of the most well-known Let us start by recalling that, within the formalism proposed realizations of MBSs in semiconducting nanos- of second quantization, a single species of electrons is de- tructures. We assume the reader to be familiar with el- scribed by creation and annihilation operators c†, c satis- ementary quantum mechanics and the formalism of sec- fying the canonical anticommutation relations c†,c† = ond quantization. Furthermore, some basic knowledge c,c = 0, c,c† = 1. If we now want to construct{ } a of the Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) formalism used to quasiparticle{ } { excitation} that behaves as its own antipar- treat systems with superconducting order at the mean- ticle, γ = γ†, it is clear that it has to take the form field level is highly beneficial. Readers unfamiliar with of an equal-weight linear combination of electronic cre- this concept may for example consult Ref. 77 for a ped- ation and annihilation operators, γ = eiφc + e−iφc† for agogical introduction. Throughout this Tutorial, we try some phase φ. We can thus already guess that the most to expose the relevant physical properties of the consid- natural place to look for MBSs is in superconductors. ered systems using only the simplest mathematical tools. Indeed, the quasiparticle excitations of a superconduc- In particular, we will not introduce the concept of topo- tor (also referred to as Bogoliubov quasiparticles) are logical invariants and the elaborate mathematical frame- linear combinations of electronic creation and annihila- work underlying the general theory of topological phases tion operators.90 However, it is not enough to just take of matter. For this and other relevant aspects that are a plain s-wave superconductor: In such a conventional not covered in this Tutorial, we refer the reader to several superconductor, the Bogoliubov quasiparticles take the 2–5,78–87 † excellent comprehensive reviews of the field.