Additions to the List of Birds Known to Be Parasitized by the Cowbirds
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Predation on Vertebrates by Neotropical Passerine Birds Leonardo E
Lundiana 6(1):57-66, 2005 © 2005 Instituto de Ciências Biológicas - UFMG ISSN 1676-6180 Predation on vertebrates by Neotropical passerine birds Leonardo E. Lopes1,2, Alexandre M. Fernandes1,3 & Miguel Â. Marini1,4 1 Depto. de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 31270-910, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. 2 Current address: Lab. de Ornitologia, Depto. de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, 31270-910, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]. 3 Current address: Coleções Zoológicas, Aves, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Avenida André Araújo, 2936, INPA II, 69083-000, Manaus, AM, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]. 4 Current address: Lab. de Ornitologia, Depto. de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade de Brasília, 70910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We investigated if passerine birds act as important predators of small vertebrates within the Neotropics. We surveyed published studies on bird diets, and information on labels of museum specimens, compiling data on the contents of 5,221 stomachs. Eighteen samples (0.3%) presented evidence of predation on vertebrates. Our bibliographic survey also provided records of 203 passerine species preying upon vertebrates, mainly frogs and lizards. Our data suggest that vertebrate predation by passerines is relatively uncommon in the Neotropics and not characteristic of any family. On the other hand, although rare, the ability to prey on vertebrates seems to be widely distributed among Neotropical passerines, which may respond opportunistically to the stimulus of a potential food item. -
21 Sep 2018 Lists of Victims and Hosts of the Parasitic
version: 21 Sep 2018 Lists of victims and hosts of the parasitic cowbirds (Molothrus). Peter E. Lowther, Field Museum Brood parasitism is an awkward term to describe an interaction between two species in which, as in predator-prey relationships, one species gains at the expense of the other. Brood parasites "prey" upon parental care. Victimized species usually have reduced breeding success, partly because of the additional cost of caring for alien eggs and young, and partly because of the behavior of brood parasites (both adults and young) which may directly and adversely affect the survival of the victim's own eggs or young. About 1% of all bird species, among 7 families, are brood parasites. The 5 species of brood parasitic “cowbirds” are currently all treated as members of the genus Molothrus. Host selection is an active process. Not all species co-occurring with brood parasites are equally likely to be selected nor are they of equal quality as hosts. Rather, to varying degrees, brood parasites are specialized for certain categories of hosts. Brood parasites may rely on a single host species to rear their young or may distribute their eggs among many species, seemingly without regard to any characteristics of potential hosts. Lists of species are not the best means to describe interactions between a brood parasitic species and its hosts. Such lists do not necessarily reflect the taxonomy used by the brood parasites themselves nor do they accurately reflect the complex interactions within bird communities (see Ortega 1998: 183-184). Host lists do, however, offer some insight into the process of host selection and do emphasize the wide variety of features than can impact on host selection. -
Reproductive Behavior of the Red-Crested Finch Coryphospingus Cucullatus (Aves: Thraupidae) in Southeastern Brazil
ZOOLOGIA 33(4): e20160071 ISSN 1984-4689 (online) www.scielo.br/zool BEHAVIOR Reproductive behavior of the Red-crested Finch Coryphospingus cucullatus (Aves: Thraupidae) in southeastern Brazil Paulo V.Q. Zima1 & Mercival R. Francisco2* 1Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de São Carlos. Rodovia Wash- ington Luís, km 235, 13565-905 São Carlos, SP, Brazil. 2Departamento de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Campus Sorocaba. Rodovia João Leme dos Santos, km 110, 18052-780 Sorocaba, SP, Brazil. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Several behavioral aspects of the Red-crested Finch Coryphospingus cucullatus (Statius Müller, 1776) are poorly studied. Here we provide reproductive information on 16 active nests. This information may be valuable to elucidate the phylogenetic relationships of this bird, and to design plans to manage it. Nesting activities occurred from October to February. Clutches consisted of two to three eggs (2.06 ± 0.25), which were laid on consecutive days. Incubation usually started the morning the females laid their last egg and lasted 11.27 ± 0.47 days. Hatching was synchronous, or happened at a one-day interval. The nestling stage lasted 12 ± 0.89 days. Only females incubated the eggs and they fed the young more often than the males did. Overall nesting success, from incubation to fledging, was 28.2%. Nest architecture and egg color proved to be diagnostic characteristics of Coryphospingus, supporting its maintenance as a distinct genus within the recently proposed sub-family Tachyphoninae. Red-crested Finches showed a preference for certain nesting sites, i.e., forest borders or a Cerrado in late regeneration stage. -
WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING in BRAZIL Sandra Charity and Juliana Machado Ferreira
July 2020 WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING IN BRAZIL Sandra Charity and Juliana Machado Ferreira TRAFFIC: Wildlife Trade in Brazil WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING IN BRAZIL TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, is a leading non-governmental organisation working globally on trade in wild animals and plants in the context of both biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. © Jaime Rojo / WWF-US Reproduction of material appearing in this report requires written permission from the publisher. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TRAFFIC David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1223 277427 Email: [email protected] Suggested citation: Charity, S., Ferreira, J.M. (2020). Wildlife Trafficking in Brazil. TRAFFIC International, Cambridge, United Kingdom. © WWF-Brazil / Zig Koch © TRAFFIC 2020. Copyright of material published in this report is vested in TRAFFIC. ISBN: 978-1-911646-23-5 UK Registered Charity No. 1076722 Design by: Hallie Sacks Cover photo: © Staffan Widstrand / WWF This report was made possible with support from the American people delivered through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily -
The Birds of Serra Da Canastra National Park and Adjacent Areas, Minas Gerais, Brazil
COT/NGA 10 The birds of Serra da Canastra National Park and adjacent areas, Minas Gerais, Brazil Lufs Fabio Silveira E apresentada uma listagem da avifauna do Parque Nacional da Serra da Canastra e regi6es pr6ximas, e complementada corn observac;:6es realizadas por outros autores. Sao relatadas algumas observac;:6es sobre especies ameac;:adas ou pouco conhecidas, bem como a extensao de distribuic;:ao para outras. Introduction corded with photographs or tape-recordings, using Located in the south-west part of Minas Gerais a Sony TCM 5000EV and Sennheiser ME 66 direc state, south-east Brazil, Serra da Canastra Na tional microphone. Tape-recordings are deposited 8 9 tional Park (SCNP, 71,525 ha , 20°15'S 46°37'W) is at Arquivo Sonora Elias Pacheco Coelho, in the regularly visited by birders as it is a well-known Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil area in which to see cerrado specialities and a site (ASEC). for Brazilian Merganser Mergus octosetaceus. How A problem with many avifaunal lists concerns ever, Forrester's6 checklist constitutes the only the evidence of a species' presence in a given area. major compilation ofrecords from the area. Here, I Many species are similar in plumage and list the species recorded at Serra da Canastra Na vocalisations, resulting in identification errors and tional Park and surrounding areas (Appendix 1), making avifaunal lists the subject of some criti 1 with details of threatened birds and range exten cism . Several ornithologists or experienced birders sions for some species. have presented such lists without specifying the evidence attached to each record-in many cases Material and methods it is unknown if a species was tape-recorded, or a The dominant vegetation of Serra da Canastra specimen or photograph taken. -
Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science (1988) Volume 98 P
Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science (1988) Volume 98 p. 581-593. SKELETONS AND THE GENERA OF TANAGERS J. Dan Webster Hanover College Hanover, Indiana 47243 ABSTRACT: There are 248 species of tanagers ( Aves, Pas- seriformes, Thraupinae) arranged in 61 genera and known chiefly from their skins. The author studied 434 skeletons of 191 species of 57 genera, describing the shape or measuring 36 characters on each. Twenty-three characters proved useful in generic discrimination. Presence or absence of a free lac- rimal; presence or absence of a manubrium-sternum bridge; shape and size of the interpalatine process; and the tibiotar- sus/ulna length ratio were the best discriminants. The phy- logeny of the tanagers remains unclear. More specimens must be studied. INTRODUCTION The 248 species of tanagers (Passeriformes, Emberizidae, Thraupinae) con- stitute a large, varied, colorful subfamily of neotropical birds. The last systematist to list all the known genera and species with their characters was Sclater (1886). Ridgway (1902) differentiated all the genera and those species found in North and Central American and the West Indies. Storer discussed the classification (1969) and listed all the forms (1970). Other important contributions were by Wetmore (1914), who described the peculiar stomach ofEuphonia, and by Beecher (1951), who stated, mainly on the basis of jaw muscles, that several genera of honeycreepers belonged with the tanagers. Lucas (1894) and Bock (1985) differ- entiated genera of honeycreepers on the basis of tongue structure. Sibley (1970) studied the egg white proteins of 7 genera. Raikow (1978, 1985) devised a clas- sification based mainly on the appendicular myology of 13 genera plus 4 borderline genera. -
A Full Life Cycle Conservation Plan for Bobolink (Dolichonyx Oryzivorus)
A Full Life Cycle Conservation Plan for Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) Authors: Rosalind B. Renfrew and Kim A. Peters, James R. Herkert, Kelly R. VanBeek, and Tom Will Editor: Linda Wires Cover Art: Liza McElroy RECOMMENDED CITATION: Renfrew, R.B., K.A. Peters, J.R. Herkert, K.R. VanBeek, and T. Will. 2019. A full life cycle conservation plan for Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus). U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Dedicated to Peter Vickery. Thank you for your leadership, your passion, and for reminding us of what matters. ii A Full Life Cycle Conservation Plan for Bobolink TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................. viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................................... xi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 5 The Bobolink as a Conservation Priority .................................................................................................................. 5 Planning Approach: Full Life Cycle Conservation .................................................................................................... -
Aprasiainis87 FAMILY
61 GENUS: Oedura GENUS; Lygodactylus GENUS: Phyllurus GENUS: Matoatoa GENUS: Pseudothecadactyl us GENUS: Microscalabotes* GENUS: Rhacodactylus GENUS; Nactus GENUS: Rhynchoedura* GENUS: Narudasia* GENUS: SaItuarius GENUS: Pachydactylus GENUS: Underwoodisaurus GENUS; PaImatogecko SUBFAMILY: Eublepbarinae'" GENUS; Psragehyra GENUS: Coleonyx GENUS: Psroedura GENUS: Eublepbaris GENUS; Perochirus GENUS: Goniurosaurus GENUS: Phelsuma GENUS: Hemitheconyx GENUS: Phyllodactylus GENUS: Holodactylus GENUS; Phyllopezus SUBFAMILY: Gekkoninae GENUS: Pristurus GENUS: Afroedura GENUS; Pseudogekko GENUS: Afrogecko GENUS; Pseudogonatodes GENUS: Agamura GENUS: Plenopus GENUS: Ailuronyx GENUS: Plychozoon GENUS: Alsophylax GENUS; Plyodactylus GENUS; Arlstelliger GENUS: Quedenfeldtia GENUS; Asaccus GENUS: Rhoptropus GENUS; Blaesodactylus GENUS; Saurodactylus GENUS: Bogertia* GENUS: Sphaerodactylus GENUS; Brlha* GENUS; Stenodactylus GENUS: Bunopus GENUS; Tarentola GENUS: Calodactylodes GENUS; Teratolepis GENUS: Carinatogecko GENUS; Thecadactylus* GENUS: Chondrodactyiu,* GENUS: Tropiocoiotes GENUS; Christinus GENUS; Urocotyledon GENUS: Cnemaspis GENUS: Uroplatus GENUS; Coleodactylus SUBFAMILY: Teratoscincinae GENUS; Colopus* GENUS: Teratoscincus GENUS: Cosymbotus FAMILY: Pygopodidae'" GENUS: Crossobamon SUBFAMILY: LiaIisinae GENUS: Cryptactites' TRIBE: Aprasiaini S87 GENUS; Cyrtodactylus GENUS; J\prasia GENUS: Cyrtopodion GENUS: Ophidiocephalus* GENUS: Dixonius GENUS; Pletholax* GENUS: Dravidogecko* TRIBE: Lialisini GENUS; Ebenavia GENUS: LiaIis GENUS; EuIeptes* -
Division 056 Importation, Possession, Confinement, Transportation and Sale of Nonnative Wildlife
DIVISION 056 IMPORTATION, POSSESSION, CONFINEMENT, TRANSPORTATION AND SALE OF NONNATIVE WILDLIFE 635-056-0010 Definitions For the purposes of these rules, the definitions in ORS 496.004 and OAR 635-045-0002 apply. In addition, the following definitions apply: (1) "Aquaria" means any tanks, pools, ponds, bowls or other containers intended for and capable of holding or maintaining live fish and from which there is no outfall to any waters of this state. (2) "Aquaria Fish" means any fish, shellfish or marine invertebrates legally acquired and sold in the pet store trade, except game fish, state or federally protected threatened and endangered species and those species listed as Prohibited or Controlled. (3) "Commercial Fur Farm" means any operation which raises captive fox (Vulpes vulpes or Urocyon cinereoargenteus) or mink (Mustela vison) for profit and possesses 10 or more animals. (4) "Controlled Species" means wildlife that the commission has placed on the Controlled list. (5) “Covered Animal Species” means: (a) Elephant –Elephantidae – All species (b) Rhinoceros – Rhinocerotidae – All Species (c) Whale – Cetacea – All Species (d) Tiger – Felidae—Panthera tigris (e) Lion – Felidae –Panthera leo and Panthera leo persica (f) Leopard –Felidae –Panthera pardus, Neofelis nebulosi, Uncia uncia (g) Cheetah – Felidae –Acinonyx jubatus (h) Jaguar – Felidae – Panthera onca (i) Pangolin – Manidae – All species (j) Marine and Leatherback turtles – Cheloniidae and Dermochelyidae– All Species (k) Shark – all species –excluding spiny dogfish as defined in ORS 498.257 (1), and excluding species obtained by an activity expressly authorized by federal law or by an activity that involves a species that is subject to a federal management plan under Title III of P.L. -
Proceedings of the United States National Museum
PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM issued 8^l^v>LCl?^ h (fte SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM Vol 104 Washington : 1955 No. 3346 MODIFICATIONS OF PATTERN IN THE AORTIC ARCH SYS- TEM OF BIRDS AND THEIR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNIFICANCE By Fred H. Glenny ^ Introduction My interest in the aortic arch system in birds was stimulated by the discovery of a functional left radix aortae in the belted king- fisher during a routine dissection of that bird in 1938. Subsequent studies on several other species of birds produced interesting ana- tomical information, and, with continued studies, a semblance of order in occurrence of carotid patterns became more and more evident. After a reasonably large series of families and orders of birds had been examined, it appeared that further studies might produce in- formation which could be of value in avian taxonomy. As a result, a series of systematic studies of the main arteries of the neck and thorax of birds was initiated and carried out over a period of about 12 years. During the past 2 or 3 years important implications with respect to the evolution of the aortic arch system in the bhds became more apparent, and the present treatise deals primarily with this aspect of my accumulated studies. The classification of birds used in this study follows the arrange- ment of Wetmore and Peters, with only a minor revision in the listiag of the parrots in the subfamily Psittacinae. In my opinion, the Wetmore and Peters classification of the birds of the world is more in accord with the natural relationships than are the schema employed by many of the European taxonomists. -
Trip Report Córdoba Endemics Pre-Tour Extension 21St to 24Th September 2015 (4 Days) Northern Argentina 25Th September to 15Th October 2015 (21 Days)
Trip Report Córdoba Endemics Pre-tour Extension 21st to 24th September 2015 (4 days) Northern Argentina 25th September to 15th October 2015 (21 days) Burrowing Parrot by David Shackelford Trip report compiled by tour leader: Luis Segura RBT Trip Report Northern Argentina & Córdoba Endemics 2015 2 Day 1: September 21st, 2015 – Our Northern Argentina 2015 tour started with Córdoba Endemics extension. We left the hotel with Peter and Alison Beer, who arrived the previous night from Eastern Patagonia, where they spent a few days birding the Valdés Peninsula area. On arrival to the airport, Adrian –our local Trogon Tours’ leader, took Peter and Alison for some “parking birding” at Córdoba airport, while Luis waited for Terry Rosenmeier and Karen Kluge to arrive from Buenos Aires. The short birding break produced some nice birds for Peter and Alison, who got Guira Cuckoo, Monk Parakeet, Brown Cacholote, Lark-like Brushrunner, Southern Martin, Shiny and Screaming Cowbirds and Greyish Olrog’s Cinclodes by Luis Segura Baywing among others. With Karen and Terri already on board, we drove down to the small village of Icho Cruz, which sits at the foot of the Córdoba Hills. We arrived at our lodge and checked in for the next two nights. We set off birding the surroundings, while waited for lunch to be served. Our first pleasant surprise was an active nest of Brown Cacholote on a tree right in front of our lodge’s main entrance. The gardens of our lodge were very productive, and we saw some wonderful birds including Grey-hooded Parakeet, Scimitar-billed Woodcreeper, Blue-and-Yellow Tanager and Golden-billed Saltator. -
A Systematic Study of the Avian Family Fringillidae Based on the Structure of the Skull
MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, NO. 81 A Systematic Study of the Avian Family Fringillidae Based on the Structure of the Skull BY HARRISON B. TORDOFF ANN ARBOR UNIVERSITY OF MlCHlGAN PRESS APRIL 26, 1954 PRICE LIST OF THE MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Address inquiries to the Director of the Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, Michigan Bound in Paper No. 1. Directions for Collecting and Preserving Specimens of Dragonflies for Museum Purposes. By E. B. Williamson. (1916) Pp. 15, 3 figures .................. No. 2. An Annotated List of the Odonata of Indiana. By E. B. Williamson. (1917) Pp. 12, lmap .................................................... No. 3. A Collecting Trip to Colombia, South America. By E. B. Williamson. (1918) Pp. 24 (Out of print) No. 4. Contributions to the Botany of Michigan. By C. K. Dodge. (1918) Pp. 14 ......... No. 5. Contributions to the Botany of Michigan, 11. By C. K. Dodge. (1918) Pp. 44, 1 map . No. 6. A Synopsis of the Classification of the Fresh-water Mollusca of North America, North of Mexico, and a Catalogue of the More Recently Described Species, with Notes. By Bryant Walker. (1918) Pp. 213, 1 plate, 233 figures. ............. No. '7. The Anculosae of the Alabama River Drainage. By Calvin Goodrich. (1922) Pp. 57, 3plates ................................................... No. 8. The Amphibians and Reptiles of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. By Alexander G. Ruthven. (1922) Pp. 69, 13 plates, 2 figures, 1 map ............ No. 9. Notes on American Species of Triacanthagyna and Gynacantha. By E. B. Williamson. (1923) Pp. 67,7 plates ........................................