Diagnosis and Recommended Treatment of Helminth Infections
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Literature Survey of Common Parasitic Zoonoses Encountered at Post-Mortem Examination in Slaughter Stocks in Tanzania: Economic and Public Health Implications
Volume 1- Issue 5 : 2017 DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2017.01.000419 Erick VG Komba. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res ISSN: 2574-1241 Research Article Open Access A Literature Survey of Common Parasitic Zoonoses Encountered at Post-Mortem Examination in Slaughter Stocks in Tanzania: Economic and Public Health Implications Erick VG Komba* Department of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania Received: September 21, 2017; Published: October 06, 2017 *Corresponding author: Erick VG Komba, Senior lecturer, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3021, Morogoro, Tanzania Abstract Zoonoses caused by parasites constitute a large group of infectious diseases with varying host ranges and patterns of transmission. Their public health impact of such zoonoses warrants appropriate surveillance to obtain enough information that will provide inputs in the design anddistribution, implementation prevalence of control and transmission strategies. Apatterns need therefore are affected arises by to the regularly influence re-evaluate of both human the current and environmental status of zoonotic factors. diseases, The economic particularly and in view of new data available as a result of surveillance activities and the application of new technologies. Consequently this paper summarizes available information in Tanzania on parasitic zoonoses encountered in slaughter stocks during post-mortem examination at slaughter facilities. The occurrence, in slaughter stocks, of fasciola spp, Echinococcus granulosus (hydatid) cysts, Taenia saginata Cysts, Taenia solium Cysts and ascaris spp. have been reported by various researchers. Information on these parasitic diseases is presented in this paper as they are the most important ones encountered in slaughter stocks in the country. -
Hymenolepis Nana) in the Southern United States.1
HUMAN INFESTATION WITH THE DWARF TAPEWORM (HYMENOLEPIS NANA) IN THE SOUTHERN UNITED STATES.1 BY Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/23/1/25/182937 by guest on 27 September 2021 G. F. OTTO. (Received for publication September 6, 1935.) Human infestation with the dwarf tapeworm has been reported from a wide variety of places in the United States but most of the evidence suggests that it is largely restricted to the southern part of the country. Even in the southern United States the incidence is low according to most of the data. Of the older surveys Greil (1915) re- ports 6 per cent dwarf tapeworm in 665 children examined in Alabama. The Rockefeller Sanitary Commission for the Eradication of Hook- worm Disease Reports for 1914 and 1915 record from 0 to 2.5 per cent dwarf tapeworm in eleven southern states (Alabama, Arkansas, Geor- gia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North and South Carolina, Ten- nessee, Texas, and Virginia) with an average of 1.8 per cent in the 141,247 persons examined. Wood (1912) tabulated the results of 62,786 routine fecal examinations made in the state laboratories of eight southern states (Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Missis- sippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia) and found an average of less than 1 per cent infection with this worm. Of the more recent reports on the frequency of the dwarf tapeworm in the general population, three are based on extensive surveys. Spindler (1929) records that 3.6 per cent of the 2,152 persons of all ages examined in southwest Virginia were positive; Keller, Leathers, and Bishop (1932) report 3.5, 2.9, and 1.5 per cent in eastern, central and western Tennessee; and Keller and Leathers (1934) report 0.4 per cent in Mississippi. -
Gastrointestinal Helminthic Parasites of Habituated Wild Chimpanzees
Aus dem Institut für Parasitologie und Tropenveterinärmedizin des Fachbereichs Veterinärmedizin der Freien Universität Berlin Gastrointestinal helminthic parasites of habituated wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in the Taï NP, Côte d’Ivoire − including characterization of cultured helminth developmental stages using genetic markers Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Veterinärmedizin an der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Sonja Metzger Tierärztin aus München Berlin 2014 Journal-Nr.: 3727 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung des Fachbereichs Veterinärmedizin der Freien Universität Berlin Dekan: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Jürgen Zentek Erster Gutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna Zweiter Gutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Heribert Hofer Dritter Gutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Achim Gruber Deskriptoren (nach CAB-Thesaurus): chimpanzees, helminths, host parasite relationships, fecal examination, characterization, developmental stages, ribosomal RNA, mitochondrial DNA Tag der Promotion: 10.06.2015 Contents I INTRODUCTION ---------------------------------------------------- 1- 4 I.1 Background 1- 3 I.2 Study objectives 4 II LITERATURE OVERVIEW --------------------------------------- 5- 37 II.1 Taï National Park 5- 7 II.1.1 Location and climate 5- 6 II.1.2 Vegetation and fauna 6 II.1.3 Human pressure and impact on the park 7 II.2 Chimpanzees 7- 12 II.2.1 Status 7 II.2.2 Group sizes and composition 7- 9 II.2.3 Territories and ranging behavior 9 II.2.4 Diet and hunting behavior 9- 10 II.2.5 Contact with humans 10 II.2.6 -
Clinical Cysticercosis: Diagnosis and Treatment 11 2
WHO/FAO/OIE Guidelines for the surveillance, prevention and control of taeniosis/cysticercosis Editor: K.D. Murrell Associate Editors: P. Dorny A. Flisser S. Geerts N.C. Kyvsgaard D.P. McManus T.E. Nash Z.S. Pawlowski • Etiology • Taeniosis in humans • Cysticercosis in animals and humans • Biology and systematics • Epidemiology and geographical distribution • Diagnosis and treatment in humans • Detection in cattle and swine • Surveillance • Prevention • Control • Methods All OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health) publications are protected by international copyright law. Extracts may be copied, reproduced, translated, adapted or published in journals, documents, books, electronic media and any other medium destined for the public, for information, educational or commercial purposes, provided prior written permission has been granted by the OIE. The designations and denominations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the OIE concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. The views expressed in signed articles are solely the responsibility of the authors. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by the OIE in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. –––––––––– The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the World Health Organization or the World Organisation for Animal Health concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. -
Dr. Donald L. Price Center for Parasite Repository and Education College of Public Health, University of South Florida
Dr. Donald L. Price Center For Parasite Repository and Education College of Public Health, University of South Florida PRESENTS Sources of Infective Stages and Modes of Transmission of Endoparasites Epidemiology is the branch of science that deals with the distribution and spread of disease. How diseases are transmitted, i.e. how they are passed from an infected individual to a susceptible one is a major consideration. Classifying and developing terminology for what takes place has been approached in a variety of ways usually related to specific disease entities such as viruses, bacteria, etc. The definitions that follow apply to those disease entities usually classified as endoparasites i.e. those parasites that reside in a body passage or tissue of the definitive host or in some cases the intermediate host. When the definition of terms for the “Source of Infection” or “Mode of Infection” relate to prevention and/or control of an endoparasitic disease, they should be clearly described. For the source of infection, the medium (water, soil, utensils, etc.) or the host organism (vector, or intermediate host) on which or in which the infective stage can be found should be precisely identified. For the mode of transmission, the precise circumstances and means by which the infective stage is able to come in contact with, enter, and initiate an infection in the host should be described. SOURCE OF INFECTION There are three quite distinct and importantly different kinds of sources of the infective stage of parasites: Contaminated Sources, Infested Sources, and Infected Sources. CONTAMINATE SOURCES Contaminated Source, in parasitology, implies something that has come in contact with raw feces and is thereby polluted with feces or organisms that were present in it. -
Pathophysiology and Gastrointestinal Impacts of Parasitic Helminths in Human Being
Research and Reviews on Healthcare: Open Access Journal DOI: 10.32474/RRHOAJ.2020.06.000226 ISSN: 2637-6679 Research Article Pathophysiology and Gastrointestinal Impacts of Parasitic Helminths in Human Being Firew Admasu Hailu1*, Geremew Tafesse1 and Tsion Admasu Hailu2 1Dilla University, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Department of Biology, Dilla, Ethiopia 2Addis Ababa Medical and Business College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia *Corresponding author: Firew Admasu Hailu, Dilla University, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Department of Biology, Dilla, Ethiopia Received: November 05, 2020 Published: November 20, 2020 Abstract Introduction: This study mainly focus on the major pathologic manifestations of human gastrointestinal impacts of parasitic worms. Background: Helminthes and protozoan are human parasites that can infect gastrointestinal tract of humans beings and reside in intestinal wall. Protozoans are one celled microscopic, able to multiply in humans, contributes to their survival, permits serious infections, use one of the four main modes of transmission (direct, fecal-oral, vector-borne, and predator-prey) and also helminthes are necked multicellular organisms, referred as intestinal worms even though not all helminthes reside in intestines. However, in their adult form, helminthes cannot multiply in humans and able to survive in mammalian host for many years due to their ability to manipulate immune response. Objectives: The objectives of this study is to assess the main pathophysiology and gastrointestinal impacts of parasitic worms in human being. Methods: Both primary and secondary data were collected using direct observation, books and articles, and also analyzed quantitativelyResults and and conclusion: qualitatively Parasites following are standard organisms scientific living temporarily methods. in or on other organisms called host like human and other animals. -
Hymenolepis Nana Is a Ubiquitous Parasite, Found Throughout Many Developing and Developed Countries
Characterisation of Community-Derived Hymenolepis Infections in Australia Marion G. Macnish BSc. (Medical Science) Hons Division of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Murdoch University Western Australia This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch University 2001 I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main work which has not been submitted for a degree at any other educational institution. ………………………………………………. (Marion G. Macnish) Characterisation of Community-Derived Hymenolepis Infections in Australia ii Abstract Hymenolepis nana is a ubiquitous parasite, found throughout many developing and developed countries. Globally, the prevalence of H. nana is alarmingly high, with estimates of up to 75 million people infected. In Australia, the rates of infection have increased substantially in the last decade, from less than 20% in the early 1990’s to 55 - 60% in these same communities today. Our knowledge of the epidemiology of infection of H. nana is hampered by the confusion surrounding the host specificity and taxonomy of this parasite. The suggestion of the existence of two separate species, Hymenolepis nana von Siebold 1852 and Hymenolepis fraterna Stiles 1906, was first proposed at the beginning of the 20th century. Despite ongoing discussions in the subsequent years it remained unclear, some 90 years later, whether there were two distinct species, that are highly host specific, or whether they were simply the same species present in both rodent and human hosts. The ongoing controversy surrounding the taxonomy of H. nana has not yet been resolved and remains a point of difference between the taxonomic and medical literature. -
Failure to Infect Laboratory Rodent Hosts with Human Isolates of Rodentolepis (= Hymenolepis) Nana
Journal of Helminthology (2002) 76, 37±43 DOI: 10.1079/JOH200198 Failure to infect laboratory rodent hosts with human isolates of Rodentolepis (= Hymenolepis) nana M.G. Macnish1, U.M. Morgan1, J.M. Behnke2 and R.C.A. Thompson1* 1WHO Collaborating Centre for the Molecular Epidemiology of Parasitic Infections and Division of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia: 2School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK Abstract Confusion exists over the species status and host-specificity of the tapeworm Rodentolepis (= Hymenolepis) nana. It has been described as one species, R. nana, found in both humans and rodents. Others have identified a subspecies; R. nana var. fraterna, describing it as morphologically identical to the human form but only found in rodents. The species present in Australian communities has never been identified with certainty. Fifty one human isolates of Rodentolepis (= Hymenolepis) nana were orally inoculated into Swiss Q, BALB/c, A/J, CBA/ CAH and nude (hypothymic) BALB/c mice, Fischer 344 and Wistar rats and specific pathogen free (SPF) hamsters. Twenty four human isolates of R. nana were cross-tested in flour beetles, Tribolium confusum. No adult worms were obtained from mice, rats or hamsters, even when immunosuppressed with cortisone acetate. Only one of the 24 samples developed to the cysticercoid stage in T. confusum; however, when inoculated into laboratory mice the cysticercoids failed to develop into adult worms. The large sample size used in this study, and the range of techniques employed for extraction and preparation of eggs provide a comprehensive test of the hypothesis that the human strain of R. -
Foodborne Anisakiasis and Allergy
Foodborne anisakiasis and allergy Author Baird, Fiona J, Gasser, Robin B, Jabbar, Abdul, Lopata, Andreas L Published 2014 Journal Title Molecular and Cellular Probes Version Accepted Manuscript (AM) DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2014.02.003 Copyright Statement © 2014 Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/342860 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Foodborne anisakiasis and allergy Fiona J. Baird1, 2, 4, Robin B. Gasser2, Abdul Jabbar2 and Andreas L. Lopata1, 2, 4 * 1 School of Pharmacy and Molecular Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4811 2 Centre of Biosecurity and Tropical Infectious Diseases, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4811 3 Department of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 4 Centre for Biodiscovery and Molecular Development of Therapeutics, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4811 * Correspondence. Tel. +61 7 4781 14563; Fax: +61 7 4781 6078 E-mail address: [email protected] 1 ABSTRACT Parasitic infections are not often associated with first world countries due to developed infrastructure, high hygiene standards and education. Hence when a patient presents with atypical gastroenteritis, bacterial and viral infection is often the presumptive diagnosis. Anisakid nematodes are important accidental pathogens to humans and are acquired from the consumption of live worms in undercooked or raw fish. Anisakiasis, the disease caused by Anisakis spp. -
Guidelines for the Control of Taenia Saginata in Meat of Domestic Cattle
GUIDELINES FOR THE CONTROL OF TAENIA SAGINATA IN MEAT OF DOMESTIC CATTLE CAC/GL 85-2014 CAC/GL 85-2014 2 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2. OBJECTIVES 3. SCOPE AND USE OF THE GUIDELINES 3.1. Scope 3.2. Use 4. DEFINITIONS 5. PRINCIPLES APPLYING TO CONTROL OF BOVINE CYSTICERCOSIS 6. PRELIMINARY RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 6.1. Identification of a food safety issue 6.2. Risk Profile 7. IDENTIFICATION, SELECTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF RISK-BASED CONTROL MEASURES 7.1. Control measures at farm level 7.2. Post-slaughter control measures 7.2.1 Post mortem inspection 7.2.2 Alternative inspection procedures 7.2.3 Treatment of meat 7.2.4 Traceability for slaughtered cattle 7.2.5 Movement control and surveillance 7.3. Selection of risk-based control measures 7.3.1 Risk-based approach 8. MONITORING AND REVIEW 9. RISK COMMUNICATION CAC/GL 85-2014 3 1. INTRODUCTION Bovine cysticercosis refers to the infection of the striated muscle of cattle with the metacestode (e.g. cysticerci) of Taenia saginata, traditionally referred to as “Cysticercus bovis”. Humans acquire the infection (taeniasis or beef tapeworm infection) solely from consumption of raw or undercooked beef containing live cysticerci. Taeniasis in human populations varies worldwide with a high prevalence in some countries. Very few countries are free from T. saginata. Bovine cysticercosis is not a condition notifiable to the OIE and is regulated in some countries. The public health significance of T. saginata is limited due to the mostly benign clinical symptoms (or asymptomatic forms illustrated in the global ranking of foodborne parasites using a multicriteria ranking tool for scoring parasites based on public health criteria only during the FAO/WHO expert meeting on Foodborne Parasites – Multicriteria based ranking for risk management (Annex 5, Figure 2 of the report1). -
Molecular Characterization of Hymenolepis Nana Based on Nuclear Rdna ITS2 Gene Marker
Molecular characterization of Hymenolepis nana based on nuclear rDNA ITS2 gene marker Mojtaba Shahnazi1,2, Majid Zarezadeh Mehrizi1,3, Safar Ali Alizadeh4, Peyman Heydarian1,2, Mehrzad Saraei1,2, Mahmood Alipour5, Elham Hajialilo1,2 1. Department of Parasitology, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. 2. Cellular & Molecular Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. 3. Student Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. 4. Department of Microbiology, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. 5. Department of Social Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. Abstract Introduction: Hymenolepis nana is a zoonotic tapeworm with widespread distribution. The goal of the present study was to identify the parasite in the specimens collected from NorthWestern regions of Iran using PCR-sequencing method. Methods: A total of 1521 stool samples were collected from the study individuals. Initially, the identification of hymenolepis nana was confirmed by parasitological method including direct wet-mount and formalin-ethyl acetate concentration methods. Afterward, PCR-sequencing analysis of ribosomal ITS2 fragment was targeted to investigate the molecular identification of the parasite. Results: Overall, 0.65% (10/1521) of the isolates were contaminated with H. nana in formalin-ethyl acetate concentration. All ten isolates were succefully amplified by PCR and further sequenced. The determined sequences were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers MH337810 -MH337819. Conclusion: Our results clarified the presence ofH. nana among the patients in the study areas. In addition, the molecular tech- nique could be accessible when the human eggs are the only sources available to identify and diagnose the parasite. Keywords: Hymenolepis nana, rDNAITS2, PCR, Iran. -
Diplomarbeit
DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit „Microscopic and molecular analyses on digenean trematodes in red deer (Cervus elaphus)“ Verfasserin Kerstin Liesinger angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Naturwissenschaften (Mag.rer.nat.) Wien, 2011 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 442 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Diplomstudium Anthropologie Betreuerin / Betreuer: Univ.-Doz. Mag. Dr. Julia Walochnik Contents 1 ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 7 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 History ..................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.1 History of helminths ........................................................................................................ 9 2.1.2 History of trematodes .................................................................................................... 11 2.1.2.1 Fasciolidae ................................................................................................................. 12 2.1.2.2 Paramphistomidae ..................................................................................................... 13 2.1.2.3 Dicrocoeliidae ........................................................................................................... 14 2.1.3 Nomenclature ...............................................................................................................