DOCSLIB.ORG

Blackboard Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Blackboard Inc 2006 ANNUAL REPORT 78151_cvr.indd 1 4/30/07 12:56:02 PM 2006 TOTAL REVENUES FY ENDING DEC. 31, 2004 2005 2006 2006 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES REVENUES Products $98.6 $120.4 $160.4 MILLION Professional Services $12.8 $15.3 $22.7 MILLION TOTAL REVENUES $111.4 $137.5 $183.1 $183.1 OPERATING EXPENSES Cost of Product Revenues $25.9 $29.6 $39.6 Cost of Professional Services Revenues $8.0 $10.2 $16.0 $39.8 Research & Development $13.7 $13.9 $27.2 $32.7 Sales & Marketing $35.2 $37.9 $58.3 General & Administrative $15.1 $19.3 $35.8 Amortization of Intangibles Resulting from Acquisitions $3.5 $0.3 $18.0 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $101.4 $111.2 $194.9 $137.5 INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS $10.0 $24.4 ($11.8) NET INCOME (LOSS) $10.0 $41.9 ($10.7) 0 2004 2005 2006 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES $32.7 $39.8 $22.9 MISSION $111.4 To enable educational innovations everywhere by connecting people and technology. ($22.9) 0 2004 2005 2006 NET CASH PROVIDED BY TOTAL REVENUES ($ IN MILLIONS) VISION OPERATING ACTIVITIES ($ IN MILLIONS) 2006 TOTAL REVENUES FY ENDING DEC. 31, 2004 2005 2006 2006 TOTAL REVENUE2006 NETS CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES FY ENDING DEC. 31, 2004 2005 2006 2006 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPEROurATING role ACTIVITIES is to improve the educational experience with Internet-enabled technology that connects students, faculty, researchers and the REVENUES community in a growing network of education environments dedicated to better communication, commerce, collaboration and content. Products $98.6 $120.4 $160.4 REVENUES MILLION Professional Services $12.8 $15.3 $22.7 Products $98.6 $120.4 $160.4 MILLION MILLION TOTAL REVENUES Blackboard’s$111.4 large and$137.5 diverse $1community83.1 of practice supports, enhances and extends our offerings every day, all over the world. The Professional Services $12.8 $15.3 $22.7 Internet offersMILLION great potential for education and the educational experience. While our role as the platform is important, communities of $183.1 TOTAL REVENUES $111.4 $137.5 $183.1 OPERATING EXPENSES practice make the best solutions. Cost of Product Revenues $25.9 $29.6 $39.6 $183.1 TOTAL REVENUES ($ IN MILLIONS) Cost of Professional Services Revenues $8.0 $10.2 $16.0 $39.8 OPERATING EXPENSES Research & Development $13.7 $13.9 $27.2 Cost of Product Revenues $25.9 $29.6 $39.6 $32.7 Sales & Marketing $35.2 $37.9 $58.3 Cost of Professional Services Revenues $8.0 $10.2 $16.0 General & Administrative $39.8 $15.1 $19.3 $35.8 2006 TOTAL REVENUES Research & Development $13.7 $13.9 $27.2 Amortization of Intangibles Resulting from Acquisitions $3.5 $0.3 $18.0 2004 $111.4 $32.7 $137.5 Sales & Marketing $35.2 $37.9 $58.3 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES FINANCIAL$101.4 $111.2 HIGHLIGHTS$194.9 General & Administrative $15.1 $19.3 $35.8 INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS $10.0 $24.4 ($11.8) Amortization of Intangibles Resulting from Acquisitions $3.5 $0.3 $18.0 NET INCOME (LOSS) $10.0 $41.9 ($10.7) YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 0 2004 2005 2006 2004 2005 2006 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $101.4 $111.2 $194.9 2006 TOTAL REVENUES $137.5 2005 $135.7 FY ENDING DEC. 31, 2004 2005 2006 NET CA2006SH NET PR CAOVIDEDSH PR OVBYIDED OPERA BY OPERTINGAT AINGCTIVITIES ACTIVITIES $32.7 $39.8 $22.9 ($ IN MILLIONS) $111.4 INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERAREVENUESTIONS $10.0 $24.4 ($11.8) Products $98.6 $120.4 $160.4 REVENUES MILLION Professional Services $12.8 $15.3 $22.7 Products $ 98.6 $ 120.4 $ 160.4 $183MILLION.1 NET INCOME (LOSS) $10.0 $41.9 ($10.7) ($22.9) 0 2004 2005 MILLION2006 0 2004 2005 2006 2006 $183.1 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATOTALTING REVENUES ACTIVITIES $32.7 $111$39.8.4 $137.5 $22.9 $183.1 Professional Services 12.8 15.3 22.7 2006 TOTAL REVENUES $183.1 NET CASH PROVIDED BY FY ENDING DEC. 31, 2004 2005 2006 2006 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES TOTAL REVENUES $111.4 $ 111.4 $ 135.7 $ 18TOT3.AL 1REVENUES ($ IN MILLIONS) OPERATING EXPENSES OPERATING ACTIVITIES ($ IN MILLIONS) 0 Cost of Product Revenues $25.9 $29.6 $39.6 REVENUES Cost of Professional Services Revenues $8.0 $10.2 $16.0 $39.8 Products $98.6 $120.4 $160.4 Research & Development $13.7 $13.9 $27.2 ($22.9) $32.7 MILLIONOPERATING EXPENSES 0 2004 2005 2006 Professional Services Sales & Marketing $35.2 $37.9 $58.3 $12.8 $15.3 $22.7 MILLION General & Administrative $15.1 $19.3 $35.8 Cost of Product Revenues $ 25.9 $ 29.6 $ 39.6 TOTAL REVENUES $111.4 $137.5 $183.1 Amortization of Intangibles Resulting from Acquisitions $3.5 $0.3 $18.0 NET CASH PROVIDED BY Cost of Professional Services Revenues TOTAL REVENUES ($ IN MILLIONS) 8.0 10.2 16.0 $183.1 TOTAL REVENUES ($ IN MILLIONS) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $101.4 $111.2 $194.9 OPERATING ACTIVITIES ($ IN MILLIONS) $137.5 Research and Development 13.7 13.9 27.2 OPERATING EXPENSES Cost of Product Revenues $25.9 $29.6 $39.6 INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS $10.0 $24.4 ($11.8) Sales and Marketing 35.22006 TOTAL REVENUES37.9 58.3 NET INCOME (LOSS) $39.8 $10.0 $41.9 ($10.7) 2004 $111.4 Cost of Professional Services Revenues $8.0 $10.2 $16.0 0 2004 2005 2006 General and Administrative 15.1 19.3 35.8 Research & Development $13.7 $13.9 $27.2 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES $32.7 $39.8 $22.9 $32.7 Amortization of Intangibles Resulting from Acquisitions 3.5 0.3 18.0 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES ($ IN MILLIONS) Sales & Marketing $35.2 $37.9 $58.3 YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2004 2005 $111.4 2006 2005 $135.7 General & Administrative $15.1 $19.3 $35.8 ($ IN MILLIONS) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $ 101.4 $ 111.2 $ 194.9 2006 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES TOTAL REVENUES ($ IN MILLIONS) Amortization of Intangibles Resulting from Acquisitions $3.5 $0.3 $18.0 REVENUES ($22.9) 0 2004 2005 2006 Products $ 98.6 $ 120.4 $ 160.4 $183MILLION.1 $137.5 2006 $183.1 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $101.4 $111.2 $194.9 Professional Services INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERA12.8TIONS 15.3 22.7 $ 10.0 $ 24.4 $ (11.8) 2004 $32.7 TOTAL REVENUES NET CASH PROVIDED BY $ 111.4 $ 135.TOT7 AL REVENUES$ 18 ($3. 1IN MILLIONS) 2006 TOTAL REVENUES 0 OPERATING ACTIVITIES ($ IN MILLIONS) INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS $10.0 $24.4 ($11.8) NET INCOME (LOSS) 2004 $$11110.4.0 $ 41.9 $ (10.7) OPERATING EXPENSES NET INCOME (LOSS) $10.0 $41.9 ($10.7) NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES $ 32.7 $ 39.8 $ 22.9 0 2004 2005 2006 Cost of Product Revenues $ 25.9 $ 29.6 $ 39.6 2005 $39.8 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES $32.7 $39.8 $22.9 Cost of Professional Services Revenues 8.0 10.2 16.0 YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2004 2005 2006 Research and Development 13.7 13.9 27.2 2005 $135.7 ($ IN MILLIONS) Sales and$ Mark111eting.4 35.2 37.9 58.3 $22.9MILLION TOTAL REVENUES ($ IN MILLIONS) REVENUES General and Administrative 15.1 19.3 35.8 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES ($ IN MILLIONS) Products $ 98.6 $ 120.4 $ 160.4 Amortization of Intangibles Resulting from Acquisitions $13.5 830.3 18.0MILLION.1 2006 $22.9 ($22.9) 2004 2005 2006 2006 2006 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES$183.1 Professional Services 12.8 15.3 22.7 TOTAL0 OPERATING EXPENSES 2006 TOTAL REVENUES$ 101.4 $ 111.2 $ 194.9 2004 $111.4 TOTAL REVENUES $ 111.4 $ 135.7 $ 183.1 INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS $ 10.0 $ 24.4 $ (11.8) 2004 $32.7 0 NET CASH PROVIDED BY 0 NET INCOMETOT (LALOSS) REVENUES ($ IN MILLIONS) $ 10.0 $ 41.9 $ (10.7) OPERATING ACTIVITIES ($ IN MILLIONS) YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2004 2005 2006 2005 $135.7 OPERATING EXPENSES NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES $ 32.7 $ 39.8 $ 22.9 2005 $39.8 Cost of Product Revenues ($ IN MILLIONS) $ 25.9 $ 29.6 $ 39.6 REVENUES Cost of Professional Services RPrevoductsenues 8.0 $ 98.6 10$.2120.4 $ 16160.4.0 $183MILLION.1 $22.9MILLION 2006 $183.1 Research and Development Professional Services 13.7 12.8 13.9 15.3 2722.7.2 2006 $22.9 TOTAL REVENUES $ 111.4 $ 135.7 $ 183.1 Sales and Marketing 35.2 37.9 58.3 0 General and Administrative 15.1 19.3 35.8 0 Amortization of Intangibles OPERAResultingTING fr EXPENSESom Acquisitions 3.5 0.3 18.0 TOTAL REVENUES ($ IN MILLIONS) NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES ($ IN MILLIONS) Cost of Product Revenues $ 25.9 $ 29.6 $ 39.6 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES Cost of Professional Services Revenues $ 101.4 8.0 $ 111.2 10.2 $ 194.916.0 2006 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES Research and Development 13.7 13.9 27.2 2006 TOTAL REVENUES Sales and Marketing 35.2 37.9 58.3 2004 $32.7 INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS $ 10.0 $ 24.4 $ (11.8) 2004 $111.4 General and Administrative 15.1 19.3 35.8 NET INCOME (LOSS) Amortization of Intangibles Resulting from Acquisitions $ 10.0 3.5 $ 41.9 0.3 $ (10.7)18.0 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES ($ IN MILLIONS) NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATOTALTING OPER AATCTIVITIESING EXPENSES $ 32.7 $ 101.4 $ 39.8$ 111.2 $ $ 22.9194.9 2006 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2004 2005 2006 2005 $135.7 2005 $39.8 INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS $ 10.0 $ 24.4 $ (11.8) 2004 $32.7 ($ IN MILLIONS) NET INCOME (LOSS) $ 10.0 $ 41.9 $ (10.7) $22.9MILLION REVENUES NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES $ 32.7 $ 39.8 $ 22.9 Products $ 98.6 $ 120.4 $ 160.4 $183MILLION.1 2006 $183.1 2005 $39.8 2006 $22.9 Professional Services 12.8 15.3 22.7 $22.9MILLION TOTAL REVENUES $ 111.4 $ 135.7 $ 183.1 0 0 2006 $22.9 OPERATING EXPENSES 0 Cost of Product Revenues $ 25.9 $ 29.6 $ 39.6 Cost of Professional Services Revenues 8.0 10.2 16.0 Research and Development 13.7 13.9 27.2 Sales and Marketing 35.2 37.9 58.3 78151_cvr.indd 3 4/30/07 12:56:11 PM General and Administrative 15.1 19.3 35.8 Amortization of Intangibles Resulting from Acquisitions 3.5 0.3 18.0 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES ($ IN MILLIONS) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $ 101.4 $ 111.2 $ 194.9 2006 NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS $ 10.0 $ 24.4 $ (11.8) 2004 $32.7 NET INCOME (LOSS) $ 10.0 $ 41.9 $ (10.7) NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES $ 32.7 $ 39.8 $ 22.9 2005 $39.8 $22.9MILLION 2006 $22.9 0 To Our Fellow Shareholders We are pleased to once again offer a few words highlighting Building on Our Strengths our recent accomplishments, outlining our strategy for future growth and, of course, thank those responsible for driving our Blackboard has unique expertise and capabilities in the continuous success at Blackboard Inc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Monsters of Education Technology
    THE MONSTERS OF EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AUDREY WATTERS Copyright © 2014 Audrey Watters The Monsters of Education Technology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. For Seymour CONTENTS Introduction I. The Hidden History of Ed-Tech The History of the Future of Ed-Tech Un-fathomable: The Hidden History of Ed-Tech Teaching Machines: A Brief History of “Teaching at Scale” II. The Ideology of Ed-Tech Against “Innovation” Engaging Flexible Learning Robots and Education Labor Moving from “Open” to Justice Men Explain Technology to Me: On Gender, Ed-Tech, and the Refusal to Be Silent III. From Monsters to the Marvelous Ed-Tech’s Monsters Beyond the LMS The Future of Ed-Tech is a Reclamation Project Beneath the Cobblestones: A Domain of One’s Own Convivial Tools in an Age of Surveillance Afterword INTRODUCTION I was supposed to write a different book this year. I do have several chapters of Teaching Machines written, I promise, and if you’re one of the people who’s told me how excited you are to read it, I’m sorry that it’s taking me so long (but thank you for the continued encouragement). I’ve done an incredible amount of research on the book – a cultural history of “teaching machines.” I’ve fallen down a rabbit hole of patent history, for example, spending hours and hours looking at plans for the various devices that have claimed to automate teaching and learning. As a constant reminder to the project, my workspace is littered with books about the history of education technology, the work of B.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Networks Fundamental Principles of Network Formation
    Social Networks 32 (2010) 61–71 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Social Networks journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/socnet Fundamental principles of network formation among preschool children David R. Schaefer a,∗, John M. Light b, Richard A. Fabes a, Laura D. Hanish a, Carol Lynn Martin a a Arizona State University, United States b Oregon Research Institute, United States article info abstract Keywords: The goal of this research was to investigate the origins of social networks by examining the formation of Network formation children’s peer relationships in 11 preschool classes throughout the school year. We investigated whether Network evolution several fundamental processes of relationship formation were evident at this age, including reciprocity, Preschool children popularity, and triadic closure effects. We expected these mechanisms to change in importance over time as the network crystallizes, allowing more complex structures to evolve from simpler ones in a process werefertoasstructural cascading. We analyzed intensive longitudinal observational data of children’s interactions using the SIENA actor-based model. We found evidence that reciprocity, popularity, and triadic closure all shaped the formation of preschool children’s networks. The influence of reciprocity remained consistent, whereas popularity and triadic closure became increasingly important over the course of the school year. Interactions between age and endogenous network effects were non-significant, suggesting that these network formation processes were not moderated by age in this sample of young children. We discuss the implications of our longitudinal network approach and findings for the study of early network developmental processes. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Our objective is to understand the fundamental principles that drive social network formation.
    [Show full text]
  • IT Award Recipient Biographies
    IT Award Recipient Biographies Institute for Business and Information TechnologyIBIT | Temple University Home | Programs | Research | Members | About IBIT | Staff I NFORMATION T ECHNOLOGY L EADER A WARD W INNERS J. Chris Scalet (2010) Executive Vice President, Global Services, and Chief Information Officer Merck and Co., Inc. J. Christopher (Chris) Scalet is executive vice president, global services, and chief information officer (CIO) at Merck & Co., Inc., responsible for the company’s information technology and global services functions, which include real estate; facilities services; Lean Six Sigma; shared business services; security; energy; travel and aviation. He is a member of Merck’s executive committee and reports to Merck Chairman, president and chief executive officer Richard T. Clark. Scalet was formerly with International Paper (IP), where he served as senior vice president and chief information officer, managing information technology and telecommunications strategy, planning, and operations for the world’s largest paper and forest products company. He was a member of IP’s senior leadership team and the company’s eBusiness Steering Committee. Prior to IP, Scalet was vice president and chief information officer at MAPCO, Inc. (now The Williams Co.), a Fortune 250 diversified energy company. Scalet is on the Board of Directors of the Netezza Corporation, and was past Honorary Conference Chair for the National Black Data Processing Associates (BDPA). He received his bachelor’s degree in management science and computer systems from Oklahoma State University and completed the executive development program at the Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University. Bill McDermott (2009) President, Global Field Operations, Member, SAP AG Executive Board SAP AG Bill McDermott is a member of the executive board of SAP AG and serves as President of Global Field Operations, overseeing the company's strategic business activities around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackboard 2005 Annual Report
    2005 ANNUAL REPORT EDUCATE INNOVATE EVERYWHERE ABOUT BLACKBOARD INC. Blackboard Inc. (NASDAQ: BBBB) is a leading provider of enterprise software applications and related services to the education industry. Founded in 1997, Blackboard enables educational innovations everywhere by connecting people and technology. With two product suites, the Blackboard Academic Suite™ and the Blackboard Commerce Suite™, Blackboard is used by millions of people at academic institutions around the globe, including colleges, universities, K–12 schools and other education providers, as well as textbook publishers and student-focused merchants that serve education providers and their students. Blackboard is headquartered in Washington, D.C., with offices in North America, Europe and Asia. MISSION To enable educational innovations everywhere by connecting people and technology. VISION Our role is to improve the educational experience with Internet-enabled technology that connects students, faculty, researchers and the community in a growing network of education environments dedicated to better communication, commerce, collaboration and content. Networked Learning Environment: We recognize that teaching and learning should occur beyond the classroom and we build products in support of anytime, anywhere learning. Networked Transaction Environment: We also recognize that any member of the university community can use just one card to enable on- and off-campus commerce transactions, activities, facilities access, and web services. Blackboard’s large and diverse community of practice supports, enhances and extends our offerings every day, throughout the world. The Internet offers great potential for education and the educational experience. While our role as the platform is important, communities of practice make the best solutions. The value of the network is connectedness.
    [Show full text]
  • Rewiring the LEARNING LANDSCAPE TC IS BREAKING NEW GROUND in APPLYING TECHNOLOGY to EDUCATION
    SPRING_2012 “GAMIFYING” THE CLASSROOM tcTODAY WHAT WE CAN The Magazine of Teachers College, Columbia University LEARN FROM ROBOTS THAT GET IT WRONG INTELLIGENT TEACHING: THE ART BELONGS TO DATA Rewiring the LEARNING LANDSCAPE TC IS BREAKING NEW GROUND IN APPLYING TECHNOLOGY TO EDUCATION cvr_COVER1_FINAL.indd 1 4/3/12 11:19 AM TACTILE SOFTNESS In our technology-driven era, even nature can be reduced to discussions of data and data access. But for Michelle Lee, a student in Richard Jochum’s Art & Art Education course “Field Work in Education,” both art and teaching are about the experience of the moment. In the assignment shown here, a visual representation of Lee’s teaching philosophy, she created a sculpture and then used a typical desktop scanner—a technology that generates light from within to expose an image (as opposed to a camera, which relies on external light)—to capture its two-dimensional image. Blogging about her work and where it came from, Lee writes, “I hope the form speaks to a mixture of textures and tensions...to the organic practice of teaching. I think the materials I used... remind us of the delicate yet strong stitching of our own experience.” INCOME FOR TODAY— ADVANCING EDUCATION FOR TOMORROW EARN UP TO ON YOUR MONEY NOW. Teachers College offers different planned giving opportunities that give you a generous return, and tax savings, plus an easy way to support the students, faculty and programs of TC. Your minimum gift of $10,000 to Teachers College as a single-life charitable gift annuity will give you xed income each year for life*.
    [Show full text]
  • On-Ramps and Off-Ramps: Alternative Credentials and Emerging Pathways Between Education and Work
    AN INSIDE HIGHER ED SPECIAL REPORT On-Ramps and Off-Ramps: Alternative Credentials and Emerging Pathways Between Education and Work New Foreword | Inside Higher Ed Co-Founder and Editor Doug Lederman With support from: Prepared exclusively for an Inside Higher Ed Insider Member. To secure your own copy, visit insidehighered.com/store Foreword The COVID-19 pandemic and the recession it spurred have accel- erated and exacerbated many preexisting trends and problems in higher education. To name just a few: Intense financial pressures on scores if not hundreds of colleges and universities. Public question- ing of the value of a degree. Racial and socioeconomic inequity. The steady, if slow, drift toward digital forms of learning. All of those pressures had contributed in recent years to burgeon- ing interest among employers, current and prospective workers, and policy makers in a wide range of alternative credentials, includ- ing certificates and industry certifications, apprenticeships, digital badges, microcredentials and lower-cost online master’s degrees. So it’s not surprising that the societal and economic changes wrought by the confluence of a global pandemic, the worst reces- sion in 100 years, and deep questioning of racial justice in American society have intensified interest in new pathways to career and life success. Inside Higher Ed’s recent report, “On-Ramps and Off-Ramps: Alternative Credentials and Emerging Pathways Between Education and Work,” remains more relevant than ever. Many of the trends identified in the 2018 report had accelerated even before COVID-19 emerged. Google continued to expand its online IT certificate, adding community college partnerships and pathways to bachelor’s degrees.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Final Pre-Trial Order
    Case 9:06-cv-00155-RHC Document 271 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION Blackboard Inc., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 9:06 CV 155 ) v. ) Judge Clark ) Judge Hines Desire2Learn Inc., ) ) Defendant. ) JOINT FINAL PRE-TRIAL ORDER This cause came before the court at a final pre-trial conference held on February 1, 2008, pursuant to Local Rule CV-16 and Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A. COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES Plaintiff Blackboard Inc. (“Blackboard”): J. Thad Heartfield (Texas Bar No. 09346800) The Heartfield Law Firm 2195 Dowlen Road Beaumont, Texas 77706 Clayton E. Dark, Jr. (Texas Bar No. 05385400) Law Offices Of Clayton E. Dark, Jr. P.O. Box 2207 Lufkin, Texas 75902 Fay E. Morisseau (Texas Bar No. 14460750) Daniel R. Foster Christopher D. Bright Michael S. Nadel McDermott Will & Emery LLP 18191 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 500 Irvine, California 92612 1 Case 9:06-cv-00155-RHC Document 271 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 2 of 16 Defendant Desire2Learn Inc. (“Desire2Learn” or “D2L”) Jo Ben Whittenburg, Esq. (Texas Bar No. 21396700) Orgain Bell & Tucker, LLP 470 Orleans Street P.O. Box 1751 Beaumont, Texas 77704-1751 James J. Zeleskey 5034-D Champions Drive Lufkin, Texas 75901 James D. Dasso (Illinois Bar No. 6193545) Gregory S. Norrod (Illinois Bar No. 6199391) Jonathan R. Spivey (Texas Bar No. 24002989) Jason J. Keener (Illinois Bar No. 6280337) Foley & Lardner LLP 321 North Clark Street, Suite 2800 Chicago, Illinois 60610 B. STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION Jurisdiction in this case is based on Title 28 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • American Revolution 2.0 Published 2013 Full
    American Revolution 2.0 How Education Innovation is Going to Revitalize America and Transform the U.S. Economy July 4, 2012 Michael T. Moe, CFA Matthew P. Hanson, CFA Li Jiang Luben Pampoulov In collaboration with GSV Advisors Deborah Quazzo Michael Cohn Jason Horne Patrick Shelton Special Advisor Michael Horn, Innosight Institute Contributor Sara Leslie Contributor Candlestick Research We would also like to honor and celebrate the lives of Stephen Covey (1932-2012), an educator and author whose work has influenced millions around the world and Sally Ride (1951-2012), a professor and the youngest and first female American astronaut to ever be launched into space. We thank the pioneers who paved the path and serve as an inspiration for all of us. For additional information, please contact Michael Moe, Deborah Quazzo or Matthew Hanson. Contact Email Phone Michael Moe mmoe@gsvam.com 650-235-4780 Assistant: Debbie Elsen delsen@gsvam.com 650-235-4774 Deborah Quazzo dquazzo@gsvadvisors.com 312-397-0070 Assistant: Kerry Rodeghero kerry@gsvadvisors.com 312-397-0071 Matthew Hanson mhanson@gsvam.com 312-339-4967 A co-author of this paper, Mr. Michael Moe, is a partner of GSV Asset Management, LLC (“GSVAM”), an investment adviser registered with the US Securities Exchange Commission, and the Chief Executive Officer of GSV Capital, Inc., (“GSVC”) a publicly traded Business Development Company for which GSVAM acts as the investment advisor. This paper contains case study information about education and related technology companies, including certain companies in which GSVC has invested. The information contained herein provides only general and summary information regarding any such companies, and contains no material non-public information.
    [Show full text]
  • AN Elearning MODULE for ADJUNCT PROFESSORS
    CANVAS LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: AN eLEARNING MODULE FOR ADJUNCT PROFESSORS A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Education By Jonathan L. Capogrossi 2020 SIGNATURE PAGE PROJECT: CANVAS LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: AN eLEARNING MODULE FOR ADJUNCT PROFESSORS AUTHOR: Jonathan L. Capogrossi DATE SUBMITTED: Spring 2020 Department of Education Shahnaz Lotfipour, Ph.D. Project Committee Chair Professor of Education Veronica Estrada, Ed. D. Administrative Faculty Pacific Oaks College ii ABSTRACT Modern higher education is delivered to learners by the academic workforce of full time and adjunct instructors, but via the web-based, software framework of Learning Management Systems (LMS). Yet, research shows that many institutions lack a training system customized to train adjuncts to effectively use LMS application programs (Bates, 2011). The designer, seeing this need, created a multimedia, eLearning module on the Canvas Learning Management System, titled ‘Jump Into Canvas’. The literature shows that the rate of hiring adjunct professors grew steadily at US institutions since the mid 1970’s (National Center for Education Statistics, 2016). But the mid 1990’s saw major changes in higher education. With the expansion of the World Wide Web in society, there was a jump in the rate of adjunct hiring, and the emergence of Online Education. Online classes became possible due to a new software system - the Learning Management System, or ‘LMS’, but the benefits of such systems caused LMS to become widely adopted as a central framework for all classes, both online and face-to- face, at most US institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Claim of Inequitable
    Case 9:06-cv-00155-RHC Document 29 Filed 11/06/2006 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION BLACKBOARD, INC. § § Plaintiff, § § Civil Action No. 9:06CV155 v. § § DESIRE2LEARN, INC, § JUDGE RON CLARK § Defendant. § § ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S CLAIM OF INEQUITABLE CONDUCT Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Desire2Learn’s Inequitable Conduct Counterclaim and to Strike Desire2Learn’s Second Affirmative Defense [Doc. # 21]. Plaintiff Blackboard, Inc. (“Blackboard”) alleges that Defendant Desire2Learn, Inc.’s counterclaim and affirmative defense of inequitable conduct fail to meet the pleading requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b). Because Desire2Learn, Inc. (“D2L”) properly pled the “who, what, when, and where” of its inequitable conduct claim, the court finds that the requirements of Rule 9(b) are met. I. Background Blackboard alleges that D2L infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,988,138 (“the ` 138 patent”). The ` 138 patent teaches systems and methods for implementing an online educational system by allowing an instructor to interact with students and transmit course lectures, textbooks, and literature via the internet. Blackboard states that D2L’s e-Learning Technology Suite infringes on this patent. In its Answer, D2L alleges that the ` 138 patent is unenforceable because of inequitable conduct. 1 Case 9:06-cv-00155-RHC Document 29 Filed 11/06/2006 Page 2 of 5 II. Standard of Review A motion to dismiss or strike for failure to satisfy the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b) is treated as a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending the Credential
    EXTENDING THE CREDENTIAL Support provided by Support provided by Extending the Credential Today’s postsecondary students are learning in ers. Today, we are partnering with innovative more ways than ever before, challenging college institutions and registrars, taking orders for and and university administrators to communicate delivering extended credentials and working to a more complete educative experience. To meet build these extensions into our core service. this need, forward-thinking schools are begin- ning to document leadership experiences and In a knowledge economy, where individuals are competency achievements along with academic defined by their credentials, we are going beyond accomplishments. The official transcript is evolv- courses, grades and credits to show the full im- ing in both form and substance. From paper sent pact of a postsecondary education. through the mail to electronic images or stan- dardized data exchanged online and extended to include: 1 in 4 adult Americans • • Competency-based transcripts that com- have a certificate or municate what was taught and what was license learned • • Experiential transcripts that verify co-cur- ricular experiences and accomplishments Our members are extending digital credentials • • Data-enabled electronic transcripts with and storing them in one place—online—where embedded links to introduce more levels of they can be easily displayed. Allowing learners to detail quickly show what they know. We live in a “credential society.” In fact, the U.S. As we move forward, we hope these essays will Census Bureau reports that one in two adults has help further illustrate the new generation of some form of postsecondary credential, and one credentialing and that we can work together to in four has a certification or license.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Technology and Standards in Higher Education
    RING( il9 V MR] gPESE S P R I N G 2 0 1 9 D A T A S U M M I T | 2 0 TH A N N U A L B E S T P RACTICES IN E D U C A T I O N D A T A S YSTEMS S T A T E O F T E C H N O L O G Y & S TANDARDS IN H I G H E R E DUCATION At the Fall 2016 Data Summit in San Diego PESC Members and resources collaborated under the Academic Credentialing and Experiential Learning Task Force to produce the PESC Approved Common XML Credential for e-Certificates, Degrees and Diplomas in record time, implemented at Johns Hopkins University and Stanford University as part of the AACRAO-NASPA Comprehensive Learner Record Project. Keynote Speaker was Valere Meus, Director, Erasmus Without Paper, Ghent University. Spring 2017 Data Summit in Washington, D.C. PESC looked externally in producing “Empowering the Mobility of Digital Academic Credentials,” showcasing external projects, resources and speakers (e.g. Credential Engine, Groningen Declaration Network, US NICE NIST, USCCF, etc.) and exemplifying the value and need for collaboration and engagement of all stakeholders in the ecosystem. Academic Credentials were examined and discussed from various perspectives: Admissions/Registrar, International, Systems/Technology, Policy/Research and Marketplace. PESC launched the JSON Task Force and the Credential Data Mapping Initiative launched under the Academic Credentialing and Experiential Learning Task Force. PESC awarded iQ4 and National Student Clearinghouse with its 18th Annual Best Practices Award.
    [Show full text]