Postemergence Control of Pilea Microphylla (Artillery Weed)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Postemergence Control of Pilea Microphylla (Artillery Weed) Ornamental, Garden & Landscape Section Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 129:243–245. 2016. Postemergence Control of Pilea microphylla (Artillery Weed) CHRIS MARBLE*, ANNETTE CHANDLER1, AND DEBALINA SAHA1 Department of Environmental Horticulture, Mid-Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida/IFAS, 2725 S. Binion Rd., Apopka, FL 32703 ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. artillery fern, herbicide, preemergence, ornamentals, landscape Pilea microphylla, also known as artillery weed, artillery fern, or gunpowder plant is weed of increasing importance in Florida. It has also recently become a nuisance in nurseries, but little information is available on herbicide efficacy. The objective of this trial was to evaluate selected nursery herbicides for postemergence control of artillery weed and measure regrowth potential following application. Nursery media was overseeded with artillery weed seeds. Artillery weed was grown for two months—at which time all plants were approximately 3.5–4.5 inches in height and had flowered. The following herbicides were applied at generally their highest label rate: sulfosulfuron [0.05 lb. active ingredient per acre (lb/aia)], sulfentrazone (0.37 lb/aia), indaziflam (0.06 lb/aia), diquat (0.5 lb/aia), oxadiazon (granular) (4 lb/ aia), glyphosate (3 lb/aia), pelargonic acid (4.2 lb/aia), flumioxazin (0.38 lb/aia), and dimethenamid-p (1.68 1.5 lb/aia). A non-treated control was also included. Data collected included visual control ratings at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after treat- ment (WAT) and shoot fresh weights (FW) were taken at 4 WAT. Plants were then grown for an additional 8 weeks to monitor any regrowth following treatment. Regrowth data indicated that the best long-term results were achieved with flumioxazin (100% control), oxadiazon (100% control) and indaziflam (100%). Results from this trial suggest that several active ingredients already labeled for use in nursery crops and landscapes can be used for artillery weed management. Oxadiazon (granular) and dimethenamid-p are also labeled for over-the-top use and could be prove to be valuable tools for controlling artillery weed in container-grown ornamentals. Further testing is needed in order to develop recommendations. Pilea microphylla (L.) Liebm, commonly known as artillery in greenhouse crops and also invades containers where it thrives weed, artillery fern, rockweed, and gunpowder plant, is a low- under daily irrigation in fertile substrates. In landscapes, it is a growing annual or short-lived perennial succulent herb in the common weed in planting beds, cracks in hardscapes, and in Urticaceae family. Common names are derived from the fact that shaded and thinning turf areas. this weed forcefully ejects pollen. Artillery weed can be identi- Growers and landscape contractors regularly report poor con- fied by its distinguishable small lime green and shiny leaves and trol of artillery weed with glyphosate, the most commonly used clumping growth habit. Artillery weed was once commonly planted postemergence herbicide in landscape plantings beds and non-crop as an ornamental groundcover and was prized for its shiny green areas of nurseries. Conover and Stamps (1997) conducted one of foliage and ability to tolerate a wide range of conditions (Gilman, the only studies to evaluate postemergence herbicide efficacy of 2014). Today it is still available in the nursery trade from a variety artillery weed. Herbicides evaluated included both preemergence of online distributors. Pilea microphylla variegata ‘Tricolor’ is a (PRE) and postemergence (POST) herbicides that were all applied popular cultivar with some gardeners due to its showy white and POST including prodiamine, isoxaben, imazaquin, fluometralin, pink foliage. While once a popular landscape groundcover, artillery oxadiazon, and glyphosate. Applications were made to plants weed is highly invasive. While few studies have investigated the growing in full sun and under a 60% shade cloth. Results showed reproductive ability of artillery weed, preliminary data shows that that in both environments, the only effective herbicide was oxa- well over 1000 seeds can be produced on a single plant in only a diazon, and to a lesser degree, glyphosate. While glyphosate had few months and seed have no dormancy requirement and a very some effect, plants had begun to regrow 6 weeks following the high viability rate. Artillery weed has begun causing management treatment, similar to current reports from nursery managers and issues in several states, most notably Florida and Hawaii where landscape applicators. While this study was very useful for the it thrives in a tropical climate. Most commonly found growing in industry, multiple herbicides have been labeled for use in nursery shaded areas, artillery weed can grow in full sun with adequate production and landscapes since this study was conducted. moisture. While control has become predominately an issue in Currently, artillery weed management consists of hand weed- Florida and Hawaii, it has been documented from South Carolina ing or applying glyphosate or a contact herbicide, such as diquat. west to Texas and as far north as Kentucky (USDA, 2016), but is Current management practices typically result in reinfestations strictly a warm season annual in more northern climates. Artillery of this weed within weeks. Therefore, research is needed to de- weed has become increasingly invasive in container plant nurser- termine the most effective herbicide for control of artillery weed ies. It is a common greenhouse weed found on floors, walls, and which will not result in immediate regrowth and subsequently increase the cost of management. The objective of this study was to determine efficacy of selective POST herbicides for control *Corresponding author; email: [email protected] of artillery weed. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 129: 2016. 243 Materials and Methods protected least significance difference (LSD) test. In all cases, means were considered significant at P = ≤ 0.05. An experiment was conducted in 2015 at the Mid-Florida Research and Education Center to determine efficacy of POST Results applied herbicides for control of artillery weed. On 31 Oct. 2015, 3.5-inch diameter (0.18 gal) nursery containers were filled At 1 WAT, the highest control ratings were recorded for plants with SunGrow® 52 substrate mix (pine bark, peat, perlite, ver- treated with pelargonic acid (9.2) followed by diquat (8.2) and miculite, dolomitic limestone, wetting agent, and starter charge; dimethenamid-p (7.5). By 2 WAT, injury ratings increased in all SunGrow Horticulture, Agawam, MA) that had been amended with treatments with the exception of pelargonic acid. Highest control Osmocote® Plus 15–9–12 at a rate of 9.4 lb/yd3. Approximately ratings were achieved with diquat and flumioxazin followed by 100 artillery weed seeds were sown to the surface of each pot. Pots dimethenamid-p and pelargonic acid. A similar trend was noted were placed in a heated shade house (60% shade) and irrigated at 4 WAT except that at this time, plants treated with glyphosate 0.5 inches each day via overhead irrigation. On 31 Dec. 2015, had control ratings similar to those treated with flumioxazin. Per- (clear skies, air temperature 81 °F, winds 9 mph, 71% relative cent control ratings collected at 4 WAT showed dimethenamid-p, humidity) artillery weeds were treated with selected herbicides diquat, glyphosate, flumioxazin, pelargonic acid, and oxadiazon (Table 1). All herbicides selected are labeled for use in container, provided the most control. Indaziflam and sulfentrazone provided field, greenhouse, or landscape ornamentals. Pots were removed marginal control (61% and 65%, respectively) while sulfosulfu- from the shade house prior to treatment and then placed back ron had little effect on artillery weed growth. Fresh weight data inside immediately after treatment. At the time of treatment, all collected at 8 WAT measuring regrowth potential after treatment plants were 3.5–4.5 inches tall and had flowered. Diquat and showed the best long-term control was achieved with flumioaxazin, pelargonic acid herbicides included the addition of Capsil® oxadiazon, and indaziflam (all 100% control); glyphosate, diquat, (Aquatrols, Paulsboro, NJ) at 0.25% by volume. All herbicides and dimethenamid-p provided similar results but small portions were applied using a CO2 backpack sprayer calibrated to deliver of green stems and leaves remained in these pots. Sulfentrazone 20 gal/acre. Plant foliage was dry at the time of application and (82%) also provided good control but was not as effective as other plants were not irrigated until the following day after treatment. herbicides evaluated. At 8 WAT, pelargonic acid only provided Data collected included visual control ratings on a scale of only marginal control (69%) and plants were able to regrow 0–10 (0 = no control; 10 = complete control, dead plant) at 1, following treatment. Sulfosulfuron only marginally suppressed 2, and 4 weeks after treatment (WAT). At 4 WAT, shoot fresh regrowth (41%). weights (FW) were recorded by cutting any remaining foliage at the soil line and immediately weighing. Plants were kept inside Discussion the greenhouse and then allowed to regrow for an additional 4 weeks to measure any regrowth. At 8 WAT, regrowth from each pot Results from this study indicate that several POST herbicides was recorded using the method described above. All shoot fresh can be used for control of artillery weed in nurseries, greenhouses, weight data were converted to percentage
Recommended publications
  • Atoll Research Bulletin No. 503 the Vascular Plants Of
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 503 THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF MAJURO ATOLL, REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS BY NANCY VANDER VELDE ISSUED BY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A. AUGUST 2003 Uliga Figure 1. Majuro Atoll THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF MAJURO ATOLL, REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS ABSTRACT Majuro Atoll has been a center of activity for the Marshall Islands since 1944 and is now the major population center and port of entry for the country. Previous to the accompanying study, no thorough documentation has been made of the vascular plants of Majuro Atoll. There were only reports that were either part of much larger discussions on the entire Micronesian region or the Marshall Islands as a whole, and were of a very limited scope. Previous reports by Fosberg, Sachet & Oliver (1979, 1982, 1987) presented only 115 vascular plants on Majuro Atoll. In this study, 563 vascular plants have been recorded on Majuro. INTRODUCTION The accompanying report presents a complete flora of Majuro Atoll, which has never been done before. It includes a listing of all species, notation as to origin (i.e. indigenous, aboriginal introduction, recent introduction), as well as the original range of each. The major synonyms are also listed. For almost all, English common names are presented. Marshallese names are given, where these were found, and spelled according to the current spelling system, aside from limitations in diacritic markings. A brief notation of location is given for many of the species. The entire list of 563 plants is provided to give the people a means of gaining a better understanding of the nature of the plants of Majuro Atoll.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Risk Assessment for Pilea Hyalina Fenzl (Urticaceae)
    Weed Risk Assessment for Pilea hyalina United States Fenzl (Urticaceae) Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service July 17, 2012 Version 1 Left: Pilea hyalina (source: The Smithsonian’s Flora of the West Indies Database, http://botany.si.edu/antilles/WestIndies/catalog.htm). Right: Pilea hyalina flowers (source: TROPICOS database, http://tropicos.org/Home.aspx; photograph taken by O. M. Montiel). Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Weed Risk Assessment for Pilea hyalina Introduction Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) regulates noxious weeds under the authority of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000) and the Federal Seed Act (7 U.S.C. § 1581-1610, 1939). A noxious weed is “any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment” (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000). We use weed risk assessment (WRA) —specifically, the PPQ WRA model1—to evaluate the risk potential of plants, including those newly detected in the United States, those proposed for import, and those emerging as weeds elsewhere in the world. Because our WRA model is geographically and climatically neutral, it can be used to evaluate the baseline invasive/weed potential of any plant species for the entire United States or any area within it.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biodiversity Survey of Papua New Guinea’S Manus and Mussau Islands
    A Rapid Biodiversity Survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands edited by Nathan Whitmore Published by: Wildlife Conservation Society Papua New Guinea Program PO BOX 277, Goroka, Eastern Highlands Province PAPUA NEW GUINEA Tel: +675-532-3494 www.wcs.org Editor: Nathan Whitmore. Authors: Ken P. Aplin, Arison Arihafa, Kyle N. Armstrong, Richard Cuthbert, Chris J. Müller, Junior Novera, Stephen J. Richards, William Tamarua, Günther Theischinger, Fanie Venter, and Nathan Whitmore. The Wildlife Conservation Society is a private, not-for-profit organisation exempt from federal income tax under section 501c(3) of the Inland Revenue Code. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Wildlife Conservation Society, the Criticial Ecosystems Partnership Fund, nor the Papua New Guinean Department of Environment or Conservation. Suggested citation: Whitmore N. (editor) 2015. A rapid biodiversity survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands. Wildlife Conservation Society Papua New Guinea Program. Goroka, PNG. ISBN: 978-0-9943203-1-5 Front cover Image: Fanie Venter: cliffs of Mussau. ©2015 Wildlife Conservation Society A rapid biodiversity survey of Papua New Guinea’s Manus and Mussau Islands. Edited by Nathan Whitmore Table of Contents Participants i Acknowledgements iii Organisational profiles iv Letter of support v Foreword vi Executive summary vii Introduction 1 Chapters 1: Plants of Mussau Island 4 2: Butterflies of Mussau Island (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera)
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Sphagneticola Trilobata on Plant Diversity in Soils in South-East Viti Levu, Fiji
    Jun. 2013, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 635-642 Journal of Life Sciences, ISSN 1934-7391, USA D DAVID PUBLISHING Impact of Sphagneticola trilobata on Plant Diversity in Soils in South-East Viti Levu, Fiji Apaitia R. Macanawai Tropical Weed Research Unit, Plant Protection Section, Koronivia Research Station, Ministry of Agriculture, Nausori, Fiji Received: January 03, 2013 / Accepted: March 02, 2013 / Published: June 30, 2013. Abstract: Wedelia (Sphagneticola trilobata (L.) Pruski) has become one of the most dominant invasive plant species in Fiji. However, the soil seed bank of its monospecific stand and its ability to reproduce by seed is relatively unknown. A soil seed bank study was undertaken in a monospecific stand of S. trilobata in Sawani, Natavea and Wainivesi in south-east Viti Levu, Fiji in March 2012. The soil samples were collected from within 1.0 m2 quadrat taken at 10 spots in each of the study areas and spread thinly over a base of Yates Thrive Premium potting mix in seedling trays and placed in a glasshouse at Koronivia Research Station, Fiji. A total of 23, 26 and 33 plant species were found in the soil seed bank in Wainivesi, Sawani and Natavea respectively which may have succumbed to S. trilobata invasiability. There were ca. 3,800 (17%), 2,100 (11%) and 2,600 (6%) germinable S. trilobata seeds·m-2 in the soil seed bank in Wainivesi, Sawani and Natavea areas respectively. This study has demonstrated that S. trilobata seeds may have a role in the spread of the invasive species in Fiji and movement of soil to S.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ANDEAN SPECIES of PILEA by Ellsworth P. Killip INTRODUCTION
    THE ANDEAN SPECIES OF PILEA By Ellsworth P. Killip INTRODUCTION Pilea is by far the largest genus of Urticaceae. Weddell in his final monograph 1 of the family recognized 159 species as valid, about 50 of which were said to occur in the Andes of South America. That these species had a very limited range of distribution was indicated by the fact that more than 30 were known from only a single collection and that only 9 of the others were in any sense widely distributed in the Andean countries. Two, P. microphyUa and P. pubescens, occurred throughout the American Tropics, and P. kyalina and P. dendrophUa extended eastward in South America. In the 50 years following the publication of this monograph only 10 species were described from the Andean region. Because of the large number of specimens of Pilea collected by expeditions to the Andes sponsored by the Smithsonian Institution, the New York Botanical Garden, the Gray Herbarium and the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, the Field Museum of Natural History, and the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, which were submitted to me for identification but which could not be assigned to any known species, I began the preparation of a mono- graph of all the Andean species. This was completed in 1935 but unfortunately could not be printed in its entirety at that time. Instead, a greatly abridged paper was published,2 which contained a key to all the Andean species, descriptions of 30 new ones, and a few changes of name and of rank. In this there was no opportunity to present descriptions of the earlier species or to discuss their synonymy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilea Victoriae V. Suresh & Sojan (Urticaceae)
    Bioscience Discovery, 9(2):290-292, April - 2018 © RUT Printer and Publisher Print & Online, Open Access, Research Journal Available on http://jbsd.in ISSN: 2229-3469 (Print); ISSN: 2231-024X (Online) Research Article Pilea victoriae V. Suresh & Sojan (Urticaceae)–A New Distributional Plant Record for Maharashtra State, India Deshmukh U. B1*., M. B. Shende1 and O. S. Rathor2 1.Higher Learning And Research Center and P.G. Department of Botany, Janata Mahavidyalaya, Chandrapur ,442401. Maharashtra, (India). 2. Ex. Principal and Reader in Botany N.E.S. Science College, Nanded. Maharashtra, (India). *[email protected] Article Info Abstract Received: 22-01-2018, During an ethno botanical survey of Chandrapur district an interesting plant of Revised: 22-03-2018, Urticaceae family was collected as a weed on shady and moist places of Accepted: 03-04-2018 gardens. After going through the literature plant species indentified as Pilea victoriae V. Suresh & Sojan, it is found to be new record for Flora of Keywords: Maharashtra State, India. A brief description with coloured photograph, India, Maharashtra State, phenological data, notes on its distribution provided here. Key is prepared for new record, Pilea Pilea genus in Maharashtra state for its easy identification. victoriae, Urticaceae. INTRODUCTION Suresh & Sojan, P. melastomoides (Poir.) Wedd., P. Pilea Lindley (1821) represented by ca.715 microphylla (L.) Liebm. and P. pubescens Liebm. species and it is the most species rich genus in the has been reported from Maharashtra State (Singh & family Urticaceae (Monro, 2004). Pilea genus Karthikeyan, 2001; Almeida, 2003). distributed throughout the temperate, tropical and sub tropical regions with the exception of Europe, MATERIALS AND METHODS New Zealand and Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • WRA Species Report
    Family: Urticaceae Taxon: Pilea hyalina Synonym: Pilea lundii Liebm. Common Name: Virdrillo Pilea scrobiculata Liebm. Urtica arvensis Poepp. ex Fenzl Questionaire : current 20090513 Assessor: Chuck Chimera Designation: H(HPWRA) Status: Assessor Approved Data Entry Person: Chuck Chimera WRA Score 8 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? y=1, n=-1 103 Does the species have weedy races? y=1, n=-1 201 Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If island is primarily wet habitat, then (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High substitute "wet tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" high) (See Appendix 2) 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High high) (See Appendix 2) 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y 204 Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates y=1, n=0 y 205 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 n 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic y=1, n=0 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 405 Toxic to animals
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Species Survey of the Kokoda Track, Papua New Guinea
    Exotic Species Survey of the Kokoda Track, Papua New Guinea Honolulu, Hawai‘i December 2015 Cover shot: Alola Village and Kokoda Track showing anthropogenous vegetation. Photo: Allen Allison. Exotic Species Survey of the Kokoda Track, Papua New Guinea Allen Allison Linda Pratt Thane Pratt Clyde Imada Pacific Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817, USA Report prepared for: PNG Conservation and Environmental Protection Authority (CEPA), Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea Bishop Museum Technical Report 67 Honolulu, Hawai‘i December 2015 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright © 2015 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2015-004 to the Pacific Biological Survey Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... v 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................1 2 Purpose ............................................................................................................................2 2.1 Compilation of a Checklist of Exotic Species ..................................................................2 2.2 Document Particularly Problematic Species ..................................................................2 3 Personnel .........................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Survey of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park Guam, Mariana Islands
    PACIFIC COOPERATIVE STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI`I AT MĀNOA Dr. David C. Duffy, Unit Leader Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way, St. John #408 Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822 Technical Report 161 Botanical survey of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park Guam, Mariana Islands July 2008 Joan M. Yoshioka 1 1 Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit (University of Hawai`i at Mānoa), NPS Inventory and Monitoring Program, Pacific Island Network, PO Box 52, Hawai`i National Park, HI 96718 PCSU is a cooperative program between the University of Hawai`i and U.S. National Park Service, Cooperative Ecological Studies Unit. Organization Contact Information: Inventory and Monitoring Program, Pacific Island Network, PO Box 52, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718, phone: 808-985-6183, fax: 808-985-6111 Recommended Citation: Yoshioka, J. M. 2008. Botanical survey of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park Guam, Mariana Islands. Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit Technical Report 161, University of Hawai`i at Manoa, Department of Botany, Honolulu, HI. Key words: Vegetation types, Vegetation management, Alien species, Endemic species, Checklist, Ferns, Flowering plants Place key words: War in the Pacific National Historical Park, Guam Editor: Clifford W. Morden, PCSU Deputy Director (Mail to: mailto:[email protected]) i Table of Contents List of Tables......................................................................................................iii List of Figures ....................................................................................................iii
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation and Flora of Nauru – 2007
    THE VEGETATION AND FLORA OF NAURU – 2007 Current Status, Cultural Importance and Suggestions for Conservation, Restoration, Rehabilitation, Agroforestry and Food, Health and Economic Security Report prepared for the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Resources and the Nauru Rehabilitation Corporation, Republic of Nauru R. R. Thaman1, D. C. Hassall2 and Shingo Takeda3 Secretariat of the Pacific Community Land Resources Division Suva, Fiji Islands January 2009 1 Professor of Pacific Islands Biogeography, Faculty of Islands and Oceans, The University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji Islands. 2 Director, Yurrah Integrated Landscape Solutions, Windsor, Queensland, Australia. 3 GIS Consultant, School of Geography, Faculty of Islands and Oceans, The University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji Islands. © Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC) 2009 Original text: English Secretariat of the Pacific Community Cataloguing-in-publication data Thaman, R. R. The vegetation and flora of Nauru – 2007: current status, cultural importance and suggestions for conservation, restoration, rehabilitation, agroforestry and food, health and economic security / R. R. Thaman, D. C. Hassall and Shingo Takeda 1. Plant ecology – Nauru. 2. Botany – Nauru. I. Hassal, D. C. II. Takeda, Shingo. III. Secretariat of the Pacific Community. 581.509685 AACR2 ISBN 978-982-00-0314-9 Secretariat of the Pacific Community Suva Sub-regional Office Private Mail Bag Suva FIJI ISLANDS Tel: +679 337 0733 Fax: +679 337 0021 Email: [email protected] Printed by Quality Print Limited, Suva, Fiji Islands DEDICATION We dedicate this report to the late Joseph Detsimea Audoa, former Minister of Health and Education and Minister of Justice in the Government of Nauru, who, because of his vision and commitment to the culture and environment of Nauru, initiated and provided the financial support for the 1980s study of the flora of Nauru, and to the people of the Republic of Nauru who have had their precious island and its vegetation and flora destroyed and degraded as a result of wars and exploitation beyond their control.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of the Horne and Wallis Islands' HAROLD ST
    The Vascular Plants of the Horne and Wallis Islands' HAROLD ST. JOHN2 AND ALBERT C. SMITHs ABSTRACT: Recent botanical collections by H. S. McKee and Douglas E. Yen, together with the few available records from published papers, have been collated into a checklist of the known vascular plants of the Horne and Wallis Islands. Of 248 species here listed, 170 appear to be indigenous. Many of these are widespread, but 45 of them are limited to the Fijian Region (New Hebrides to Samoa) . Of the four known endemic species, Elatostema yenii St. John and Peperomia fllttmaensis St. John are herewith proposed as new, and a new combination in the fern genus Tbelypteris, by G. Brownlie, is included. THE HORNE AND WALLIS ISLANDS, forming Alofi, and Uvea, and it seems pertinent to bring the French Protectorat des Iles Wallis et Futuna, together the available data on the vascular plants lie to the northeast of Fiji, due west of Samoa, of the area. In the present treatment all the and due east of Rotuma. The Horne Islands in­ specimens obtained by McKee and Yen are clude Futuna (with about 25 square miles) and cited, and we also include as many Burrows Alofi (with about 11 square miles) , lying some specimens as could be located in the herbarium 150 miles northeast of Vanua Levu and about of the Bishop Museum. We have also listed 100 miles southwest of Uvea. Both Futuna and several species for which no herbarium vouch­ Alofi are high islands with fringing coral reefs; ers are at hand. These latter records are included the former attains an elevation of about 760 m on the basis of apparently reliable reports of in Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Atoll Research Bulletin No. 392 the Flora of Nauru Rr
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 392 THE FLORA OF NAURU RR THAMAN, F.R FOSBERG, EL MANNER AND D.C. HASSALL ISSUED BY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL J!WTORY SMllTJ!WNIAN INSTlTUTION WASHINGTON, D.C, USA FEBRUARY 1994 DEDICATION We dedicate this Flora of Nauru to Joseph Detsimea Audoa, his family and the people of the Republic of Nauru who have had their precious island and its flora destroyed and degraded as a result of wars and exploitation beyond their control. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge, in particular, the late Honorable Joseph Detsimea Audoa, the Minister of Health and Education at the time of the commencement of the study and later Minister of Justice in the Government of Nauru, who, because of his vision and commitment to the culture and environment of Nauru, initiated and provided the financial support for the study of the flora of Nauru. He was particularly concerned that the plants of Nauru and their cultural uses be recorded before such knowledge was lost. We also acknowledge Mr. Lisle Newby, the then Director of Education, who, along with Joe Audoa, were the main supporters of the project, and who provided valuable logistical support throughout. Special thanks are also given to our main local informants and assistants, the Reverend James Aingimea and the late Henry Michael Heine; and to Daphne Fotu, Jacob Gabwinare, Katarina Satto, Kenia Raidinen, Reynold Capelle, Eda Adam and Montiba Star, our main informants in relation to the cultural uses and Nauruan names of plants. Our thanks also go to the Honorable Lawrence Stephen, Minister of Education during part of the project; Obera Menke, Robert Kaierua, Leo Keke, Delilah Capelle, Eddie Borak, John Healy, Gary Bailey, Dennis and Ria Berdinner, Julie Olsson, Dennis Ketner, Sio Fotu, Pine Harrison, John Brechtefeld, Rene Harris, Porthos Bop, Jacob Aroi, Leon Thompson, Benjamin Morgan, Iosefa Elisala and Teaora Tabanou, all of whom contributed in some way to the success of the study.
    [Show full text]