Respiratory Equations – Behind the Numbers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Respiratory Equations – Behind the Numbers Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 2020;26(6 Suppl 3):S90-93 https://doi.org/10.36303/SAJAA.2020.26.6.S3.2546 South Afr J Anaesth Analg Open Access article distributed under the terms of the ISSN 2220-1181 EISSN 2220-1173 Creative Commons License [CC BY-NC 3.0] © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 FCA 1 REFRESHER COURSE Respiratory equations – behind the numbers T Leonard Department of Anaesthesia, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Summary Candidates for the FCA 1 exam will come across dozens of equations that eventually all merge into something complicated and daunting. The purpose of this review is to highlight some of the respiratory equations that are important and that candidates find confusing and explain the mathematical and physiological principles behind them. Keywords: equations, respiratory physiology, ventilation, perfusion, dead space Introduction VD / VT = (PACO2 – PECO2) / PACO2 P CO partial pressure of CO in alveolar gas There are many equations that candidates will come across in A 2 2 their study of respiratory physiology. These equations describe PECO2 partial pressure of CO2 in the total mixed principles of ventilation, perfusion and diffusion within the res- exhaled breath piratory system. This review attempts to explain the origins and A further modification was made by Henrik Enghoff due to make sense of the numbers in some of these equations. 2 difficulties measuring theA P CO2. This gives the physiological Equations to be covered: dead space equation:1 • Dead space equations VD / VT = (PaCO2 – PeCO2) / PaCO2 • The alveolar gas equation VD physiological dead space volume • Diffusion equations VT tidal volume • Ventilation-perfusion equations PaCO2 partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood Dead space equations PeCO2 partial pressure of carbon dioxide in expired Physiological dead space represents the portion of ventilation gas 1 that does not eliminate carbon dioxide (CO2). This consists of the anatomical dead space (the fraction of ventilation Important in this equation is understanding the derivation. 1,2 delivered to the conducting airways – roughly 150 ml) and The derivation is based on the principal that only the gases the alveolar dead space (the fraction of ventilation delivered to involved in alveolar ventilation (VA) are involved in gas alveoli with no pulmonary artery perfusion).2 In 1891, Christian exchange and produce CO2. The total tidal volume (VT) is made Bohr introduced his equation to represent the volume of gas 1,2,4 up of VA + VD; we can substitute VA for VT – VD. that constitutes the dead space. Now we must look at the fraction of expired (F ) and inspired The original version of this equation is:2 E (F) CO . This can be done for nitrogen and oxygen, but CO is V / V = (F CO – F CO ) / F CO i 2 2 D T A 2 E 2 A 2 most commonly used. VD respiratory dead space volume In one exhalation the expired CO2 = FE.VT and this must be VT tidal volume made of alveolar gas and dead space gas. Therefore VT.FE = FACO2 mean estimate of alveolar CO2 concentration VA.FA + VD.Fi and it is assumed that the FICO2 is 0. FECO2 CO2 concentration in the total mixed exhaled 1,2,4 breath Therefore: VT.FE = VA.FA This equation has undergone some changes due to difficulties Substitute VA for VT – VD in measuring FACO2 and FECO2. Using Dalton’s law (the concentration of a gas is proportional to its partial pressure)3 VT.FE = (VT – VD).FA 4 we can substitute FA and FE for partial pressures. Multiply out the brackets South Afr J Anaesth Analg 2020; 26(6)Supplement S90 http://www.sajaa.co.za Respiratory equations – behind the numbers VT.FE = (VT.FA) – (VD.FA) Input = VA x FIO2 Rearrange to get VD on the left of the equation Output = VO2 + (VA x FAO2) VD.FA = VT(FA – FE) VA x FIO2 = VO2 + (VA x FAO2) Divide VT and FA Solve for VO2 VD / VT = (FA – FE) / FA VO2 = VA x (FIO2 – FAO2) Substitute with partial pressure Respiratory quotient: VD / VT = (PACO2 – PECO2) / PACO2 Now use the Enghoff modification This is defined as “the volume of carbon dioxide released over the volume of oxygen absorbed during respiration. It VD / VT = (PaCO2 – PeCO2) / PaCO2 is a dimensionless number used in the calculation for basal metabolic rate.”6 The alveolar gas equation (AGE) R = VCO2 / VO2 The AGE describes the alveolar concentration (or partial pressure) of oxygen (O2) in terms of the inspired oxygen The final derivation: concentration, the alveolar concentration of CO2 and the R = VCO / VO = (F CO x V ) / [V x (F O – F O )] respiratory quotient (R).5 2 2 A 2 A A I 2 A 2 Cancel out VA in the numerator and denominator FAO2 = FIO2 – (FACO2 / R) R = FACO2 / (FIO2 – FAO2) Rewriting the equation applying Dalton’s law again gives this Solve for FAO2 equation: (FIO2 – FAO2) = FACO2 / R PAO2 = PIO2 – (PACO2 / R) FAO2 = FIO2 – FACO2 / R PAO2 alveolar partial pressure of O2 Convert to partial pressures and assume PACO2 = PaCO2 PIO2 inspired partial pressure of O2 PAO2 = PIO2 – (PaCO2 / R) PACO2 alveolar partial pressure of CO2 This is AGE that is most often used. However, there is a problem R respiratory quotient with this equation in that it may be too simplistic when the 1,5 Derivation of the AGE: value of R does not equal 1. In the derivation of the AGE we substituted R for VCO2 / VO2 and indeed when R = 0.8 as it most To derive and understand the AGE (as well as its limitations) we often does this would mean a VCO2 of 0.20 l/min and VO2 of need to look at each component of the equation. 0.25 l/min which is a discrepancy of 50 ml per minute. Carbon dioxide: Thus, the modified AGE is:1,5,7 At steady state all CO2 produced by the body (VCO2) must be PAO2 = PIO2 – (PaCO2 / R) + [FIO2 x PaCO2 x ( (1 – R) / R)] removed by the alveolar ventilation each minute and because The additional part of the equation has relatively minor effect CO2 is highly diffusible we can assume that AP CO2 very closely 5 in usual clinical practice. approximates PaCO2. VCO2 = FACO2 x VA Diffusion equations Dalton’s law of partial pressures needs to be applied again and In 1855 Adolf Fick described how a gas moves across a mem- states that in a mixture of gases the individual gas CO2 will brane. It is not an equation that can be solved with measurable be present in a concentration that is the same proportion as numbers but rather shows the factors that affect the move- 5 8 PACO2 is of the total pressure PI. ment of a gas (oxygen) across the alveolar membrane. VCO2 = (PACO2 / PI) x VA Flow of gas ∞ [A x D (P1 – P2)] / T The equation can be rearranged A area of the membrane PACO2 = (VCO2 x PI) / VA = PaCO2 D diffusion constant of the gas Oxygen: (P1 – P2) partial pressure (or concentration) gradient across the membrane All oxygen entering the alveoli must equal the oxygen leav- T thickness of the membrane ing the alveoli. Input into the alveoli is from the inspired air whereas the output of oxygen is a combination of oxygen D ∝ solubility of gas / √molecular weight of gas 5 consumption (VO2) and expired oxygen. This states that the rate of transfer of a gas is directly pro- Input = output portional to the area of a membrane, the diffusion constant South Afr J Anaesth Analg 2020; 26(6)Supplement S91 http://www.sajaa.co.za Respiratory equations – behind the numbers for that gas and the concentration gradient across the VA / Q = 8.63 x (CaO2 – CvO2)/(PIO2 – PAO2) membrane and it is inversely proportional to the thickness of The constant allows for standardisation when the units used for the membrane.1,8 VA and Q are l/min, CaO2 and CvO2 are ml/dl and for PIO2 and PAO2 are mmHg.10 Ventilation and perfusion relationship equations The same principle can be applied for CO except that the CO The concept of dead space has been discussed previously but 2 2 content of mixed venous and arterial blood are reversed because there are two other equations that can be used to describe CO is being eliminated.10 ventilation and perfusion relationships in the lung. 2 VA / Q = 8.63 x (CVCO2 – CaCO2) / (PACO2 – PICO2) These two equations explain why in an area of lung with reduced VA / Q ratio the PAO2 and CaO2 will fall greater than the PACO2 will rise while in areas with high VA / Q ratio the PAO2 rises while PACO2 falls. Therefore, low VA / Q areas affect O2 more and high VA / Q 10 areas affect CO2 more. The shunt equation: This equation gives a ratio of the shunt blood flow to total blood flow. Shunt blood flow is blood that is not exposed to any gas Figure 1: O2-CO2 diagram showing a ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) ratio line1 exchange. This may be areas of the lung with V/Q ratio of 0 or 11 venous blood that enters the arterial system directly. The figure illustrates the relationship between alveolar 2O and Important in understanding and deriving this equation is to be CO2 partial pressure at varying V/Q ratios. Numerically this can be described using the Bohr equation, V/Q ratio equation and able to draw a theoretical alveolus with blood being oxygenated the shunt equation.
Recommended publications
  • The Oxyhaemoglobin Dissociation Curve in Critical Illness
    Basic sciences review The Oxyhaemoglobin Dissociation Curve in Critical Illness T. J. MORGAN Intensive Care Facility, Division of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, QUEENSLAND ABSTRACT Objective: To review the status of haemoglobin-oxygen affinity in critical illness and investigate the potential to improve gas exchange, tissue oxygenation and outcome by manipulations of the oxyhaemoglobin dissociation curve. Data sources: Articles and published peer-review abstracts. Summary of review: The P50 of a species is determined by natural selection according to animal size, tissue metabolic requirements and ambient oxygen tension. In right to left shunting mathematical modeling indicates that an increased P50 defends capillary oxygenation, the one exception being sustained hypercapnia. Increasing the P50 should also be protective in tissue ischaemia, and this is supported by modeling and experimental evidence. Most studies of critically ill patients have indicated reduced 2,3-DPG concentrations. This is probably due to acidaemia, and the in vivo P50 is likely to be normal despite low 2,3-DPG levels. It may soon be possible to achieve significant P50 elevations without potentially harmful manipulations of acid-base balance or hazardous drug therapy. Conclusions: Despite encouraging theoretical and experimental data, it is not known whether manipulations of the P50 in critical illness can improve gas exchange and tissue oxygenation or improve outcome. The status of the P50 may warrant more routine quantification and consideration along with the traditional determinants of tissue oxygen availability. (Critical Care and Resuscitation 1999; 1: 93-100) Key words: Critical illness, haemoglobin-oxygen affinity, ischaemia, P50, tissue oxygenation, shunt In intensive care practice, manipulations to improve in the tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxygenation and Oxygen Therapy
    Rules on Oxygen Therapy: Physiology: 1. PO2, SaO2, CaO2 are all related but different. 2. PaO2 is a sensitive and non-specific indicator of the lungs’ ability to exchange gases with the atmosphere. 3. FIO2 is the same at all altitudes 4. Normal PaO2 decreases with age 5. The body does not store oxygen Therapy & Diagnosis: 1. Supplemental O2 is an FIO2 > 21% and is a drug. 2. A reduced PaO2 is a non-specific finding. 3. A normal PaO2 and alveolar-arterial PO2 difference (A-a gradient) do NOT rule out pulmonary embolism. 4. High FIO2 doesn’t affect COPD hypoxic drive 5. A given liter flow rate of nasal O2 does not equal any specific FIO2. 6. Face masks cannot deliver 100% oxygen unless there is a tight seal. 7. No need to humidify if flow of 4 LPM or less Indications for Oxygen Therapy: 1. Hypoxemia 2. Increased work of breathing 3. Increased myocardial work 4. Pulmonary hypertension Delivery Devices: 1. Nasal Cannula a. 1 – 6 LPM b. FIO2 0.24 – 0.44 (approx 4% per liter flow) c. FIO2 decreases as Ve increases 2. Simple Mask a. 5 – 8 LPM b. FIO2 0.35 – 0.55 (approx 4% per liter flow) c. Minimum flow 5 LPM to flush CO2 from mask 3. Venturi Mask a. Variable LPM b. FIO2 0.24 – 0.50 c. Flow and corresponding FIO2 varies by manufacturer 4. Partial Rebreather a. 6 – 10 LPM b. FIO2 0.50 – 0.70 c. Flow must be sufficient to keep reservoir bag from deflating upon inspiration 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of the Respiratory Quotient of Peat
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Hydroponics/Soilless Media Research 8-10-2012 Measurement of the Respiratory Quotient of Peat Jake Nelson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cpl_hydroponics Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Nelson, Jake, "Measurement of the Respiratory Quotient of Peat" (2012). Hydroponics/Soilless Media. Paper 5. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cpl_hydroponics/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Research at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hydroponics/Soilless Media by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Measurement of the respiratory quotient of peat Jake Nelson 8/10/2012 BIOL 5800 Undergraduate Research Summer 2010 Introduction Respiratory quotient (RQ) is the ratio of CO produced to O consumed by an organism. Complete respiration 2 2 of glucose will give an RQ of 1 as described by the formula C H O +nO →nCO +nH O. The respiration of n 2n n 2 2 2 molecules with lower oxygen content, such as lipids, give RQ values of less than one, whereas in cases of anaerobic metabolism, an increase in biomass or the respiration of substances such as humic, oxalic and citric acids the respiratory quotient can be greater than one. In complex systems such as soil, Dilly (2003) found that the RQ varied dramatically, and changed within the same soil under varying conditions. Similarly, Hollender et al. (2003) found RQ was informative in determining the underlying metabolic mechanisms, such as nitrification processes. Dilly (2004), studied the effects of various organic compounds on RQ, and found that beech forest soils amended with cellulose or humic acid maintained RQ values greater than one for more than 20 days after application.
    [Show full text]
  • Respiratory Physiology for the Anesthesiologist
    REVIEW ARTICLE Deborah J. Culley, M.D., Editor ABSTRACT Respiratory function is fundamental in the practice of anesthesia. Knowledge of basic physiologic principles of respiration assists in the proper implemen- tation of daily actions of induction and maintenance of general anesthesia, Respiratory Physiology delivery of mechanical ventilation, discontinuation of mechanical and pharma- cologic support, and return to the preoperative state. The current work pro- Downloaded from http://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article-pdf/130/6/1064/455191/20190600_0-00035.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 for the Anesthesiologist vides a review of classic physiology and emphasizes features important to the anesthesiologist. The material is divided in two main sections, gas exchange Luca Bigatello, M.D., Antonio Pesenti, M.D. and respiratory mechanics; each section presents the physiology as the basis ANESTHESIOLOGY 2019; 130:1064–77 of abnormal states. We review the path of oxygen from air to the artery and of carbon dioxide the opposite way, and we have the causes of hypoxemia and of hypercarbia based on these very footpaths. We present the actions nesthesiologists take control of the respiratory func- of pressure, flow, and volume as the normal determinants of ventilation, and Ation of millions of patients throughout the world each we review the resulting abnormalities in terms of changes of resistance and day. We learn to maintain gas exchange and use respiration compliance. to administer anesthetic gases through the completion of (ANESTHESIOLOGY 2019; 130:1064–77) surgery, when we return this vital function to its legitimate owners, ideally with a seamless transition to a healthy post- operative course.
    [Show full text]
  • Respiratory Support
    Intensive Care Nursery House Staff Manual Respiratory Support ABBREVIATIONS FIO2 Fractional concentration of O2 in inspired gas PaO2 Partial pressure of arterial oxygen PAO2 Partial pressure of alveolar oxygen PaCO2 Partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide PACO2 Partial pressure of alveolar carbon dioxide tcPCO2 Transcutaneous PCO2 PBAR Barometric pressure PH2O Partial pressure of water RQ Respiratory quotient (CO2 production/oxygen consumption) SaO2 Arterial blood hemoglobin oxygen saturation SpO2 Arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry PIP Peak inspiratory pressure PEEP Positive end-expiratory pressure CPAP Continuous positive airway pressure PAW Mean airway pressure FRC Functional residual capacity Ti Inspiratory time Te Expiratory time IMV Intermittent mandatory ventilation SIMV Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation HFV High frequency ventilation OXYGEN (Oxygen is a drug!): A. Most infants require only enough O2 to maintain SpO2 between 87% to 92%, usually achieved with PaO2 of 40 to 60 mmHg, if pH is normal. Patients with pulmonary hypertension may require a much higher PaO2. B. With tracheal suctioning, it may be necessary to raise the inspired O2 temporarily. This should not be ordered routinely but only when the infant needs it. These orders are good for only 24h. OXYGEN DELIVERY and MEASUREMENT: A. Oxygen blenders allow O2 concentration to be adjusted between 21% and 100%. B. Head Hoods permit non-intubated infants to breathe high concentrations of humidified oxygen. Without a silencer they can be very noisy. C. Nasal Cannulae allow non-intubated infants to breathe high O2 concentrations and to be less encumbered than with a head hood. O2 flows of 0.25-0.5 L/min are usually sufficient to meet oxygen needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Respiratory Therapy Pocket Reference
    Pulmonary Physiology Volume Control Pressure Control Pressure Support Respiratory Therapy “AC” Assist Control; AC-VC, ~CMV (controlled mandatory Measure of static lung compliance. If in AC-VC, perform a.k.a. a.k.a. AC-PC; Assist Control Pressure Control; ~CMV-PC a.k.a PS (~BiPAP). Spontaneous: Pressure-present inspiratory pause (when there is no flow, there is no effect ventilation = all modes with RR and fixed Ti) PPlateau of Resistance; Pplat@Palv); or set Pause Time ~0.5s; RR, Pinsp, PEEP, FiO2, Flow Trigger, rise time, I:E (set Pocket Reference RR, Vt, PEEP, FiO2, Flow Trigger, Flow pattern, I:E (either Settings Pinsp, PEEP, FiO2, Flow Trigger, Rise time Target: < 30, Optimal: ~ 25 Settings directly or by inspiratory time Ti) Settings directly or via peak flow, Ti settings) Decreasing Ramp (potentially more physiologic) PIP: Total inspiratory work by vent; Reflects resistance & - Decreasing Ramp (potentially more physiologic) Card design by Respiratory care providers from: Square wave/constant vs Decreasing Ramp (potentially Flow Determined by: 1) PS level, 2) R, Rise Time (­ rise time ® PPeak inspiratory compliance; Normal ~20 cmH20 (@8cc/kg and adult ETT); - Peak Flow determined by 1) Pinsp level, 2) R, 3)Ti (shorter Flow more physiologic) ¯ peak flow and 3.) pt effort Resp failure 30-40 (low VT use); Concern if >40. Flow = more flow), 4) pressure rise time (¯ Rise Time ® ­ Peak v 0.9 Flow), 5) pt effort (­ effort ® ­ peak flow) Pplat-PEEP: tidal stress (lung injury & mortality risk). Target Determined by set RR, Vt, & Flow Pattern (i.e. for any set I:E Determined by patient effort & flow termination (“Esens” – PDriving peak flow, Square (¯ Ti) & Ramp (­ Ti); Normal Ti: 1-1.5s; see below “Breath Termination”) < 15 cmH2O.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Intrapulmonary Shunt at Different Levels of Fractional Inspired Oxygen
    Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.35.3.181 on 1 March 1980. Downloaded from Thorax, 1980, 35, 181-186 Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on intrapulmonary shunt at different levels of fractional inspired oxygen A OLIVEN, U TAITELMAN, F ZVEIBIL, AND S BURSZTEIN From the Intensive Care Department, Rambam Medical Centre, Haifa, Israel ABSTRACT In 10 patients undergoing ventilation, venous admixture was measured at different values of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The measurements were performed at the level of fractional inspired oxygen (FIO2) at which each patient was ventilated, and at FIo2=1. In patients ventilated at FIo2 between 0-21 and 0 3 venous admixture was not modified by PEEP, while in patients ventilated with FIO2 between 0'4 and 0-6, venous admixture decreased significantly (p<0 01). With FIO2=1, increased PEEP produced a reduction in venous admixture in all cases (p < 0 .05). These observations suggest that in patients similar to ours, PEEP does not reduce venous admixture at low levels of Fio2 (0-21-0.3), and the observed reduction with PEEP at FIO2= I may be misinterpreted. copyright. In patients with acute respiratory failure, and vital signs and minute volume were positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has repeatedly checked, in order to confirm steady been said to reduce pulmonary venous admixture state condi-tions. Blood samples were drawn and improve arterial blood oxygenation.13 The simultaneously into heparinised glass syringes efficiency of PEEP can thus be -evaluated by its from an indwelling arterial line and from a http://thorax.bmj.com/ influence on venous admixture.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Oxygenator Function: Gas Exchange, Heat Transfer, and Operation
    Thoracic Key Fastest Thoracic Insight Engine Home Log In Register Categories » More References » About Gold Membership Contact Search... Principles of Oxygenator Function: Gas Exchange, Heat Transfer, and Operation Principles of Oxygenator Function: Gas Exchange, Heat Transfer, and Operation Michael H. Hines INTRODUCTION Since the early 1950s when the development of a heart-lung machine first began, there has been a tremendous evolution of devices and machinery for cardiac support (1,2). However, despite the diversity in designs through the years, they all contain three essential components: a mechanism to circulate the blood, a method of gas exchange for oxygen and carbon dioxide, and some mechanism for temperature control. Chapter 2 has covered the first important component, and we will now focus on the two subsequent elements: gas exchange and heat transfer. And while it is referred to as the “oxygenator,” we must recognize that it is responsible for the movement of both oxygen in, as well as carbon dioxide out. The discussion will start with a basic review of the principles of physics, and then we will apply those principles to the devices used specifically in extracorporeal support, including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). You may notice as you go through this chapter that there is a scarcity of trade and manufacturer names. The author has intentionally avoided using these. The intent was primarily to focus on the physiology, physics, and chemistry of the oxygenator and heat exchanger, but also to emphasize the fact that there are a large number of manufacturers producing many products that have all been shown to function extremely well.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Oxygen Transport
    Introductory Human Physiology ©copyright Jennifer Carbrey & Emma Jakoi 5. Oxygen transport Partial Pressures of Alveolar Gases In the alveoli, the partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide vary during the respiratory cycle. As gas exchange occurs, the alveolar partial pressure of carbon dioxide will rise and the alveolar partial pressure of oxygen will fall. Because these fluctuations are small (a few mm Hg) as compared with the 3000 ml present at the end of tidal exhalation, they are generally ignored and only mean values PO2 and PCO2 are considered. The relationship between PO2 and PCO2 in the alveoli is described by the alveolar gas equation: PAO2 = (Patm- PH2O) x FiO2 – PACO2/RQ Because diffusion is so rapid and complete in the lung, the PACO2 and PAO2 in the alveoli normally determine these gas pressures in arterial blood (PaCO2 and PaO2). But there is a slight difference between alveolar and arterial gas pressures even in normal subjects such that PAO2 and PaO2 differ by 5-15 mm Hg. This difference is due to anatomical shunting of blood (reduced perfusion) and to the mismatch between ventilation and perfusion that exists even in normal lungs. Both of these conditions will be discussed later in detail. Normal values for arterial PaO2 and PaCO2 are: PaO2 = 100 mm Hg PaCO2= 40 mm Hg. The PaO2 and PaCO2 can be measured directly from arterial blood draws. PAO2 is calculated by the alveolar gas equation. For a patient breathing room air at sea level, this equation simplifies to: PAO2 = 150 - PaCO2/0.8 Notice that alveolar PO2 is determined by three factors: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxylgen Coneenitration of the Air Was About 5 Per Cent.; It Roseto Higher
    EFFECT OF OXYGEN CONCENTRATION ON THE RESPIRATION OF SOME VEGETABLES' HANS PLATENIUS (WITH SEVEN FIGURES) Introduction Commiiiiercial methods of storing fruits and vegetables in modified atmos- phere are based on the fact that respiration, ripening, and other physiolog- ical processes can be retarded by maintaining an atmosphere in which the oxygen content is lower and the carbon dioxide concentration higher than in normal air. Many investigators assume that it is the presence of carbon dioxide rather than the limited oxygen supply which has a depressing effect on the physiological activity of the plant tissue. In fact, modified atmos- phere storage is frequently spoken of as "carbon dioxide storage." There is reason to believe, however, that the importance of a limited oxygen supply itself has been underestimated. Indirect evidence for this view is found in the results of THORNTON (8) which make it clear that the presence of carbon dioxide in the storage atmosphere does nlot always depress the respiration of plant material. On the contrary, he found that the respi- ration rate of potatoes and onions was markedly increased when held in an atmosphere of normiial oxygen content to which varying quantities of carbon dioxide had been added. On the other hand, the same treatment had a depressing effect on the respiratory activity of asparagus and strawberries. In the literature few experiments are reported which deal exclusively with the effect of low concentrations of oxygen on the respiration of plant tissue. Somiie of these experiments were conducted for a few hours only, and there is no assurance that the results would have been the same had the storage period been extended to several days.
    [Show full text]
  • High Respiratory Quotient Is Associated with Increases in Body Weight and Fat Mass in Young Adults
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2016) 70, 1197–1202 © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved 0954-3007/16 www.nature.com/ejcn ORIGINAL ARTICLE High respiratory quotient is associated with increases in body weight and fat mass in young adults RP Shook1, GA Hand2, AE Paluch3, X Wang3, R Moran4, JR Hébert4,5,6, JM Jakicic7 and SN Blair3,4 BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Metabolic disturbances, such as reduced rates of fat oxidation (high respiratory quotient (RQ)) or low energy expenditure (low resting metabolic rate (RMR)), may contribute to obesity. The objective was to determine the association between a high RQ or a low RMR and changes in body weight and body composition over 1 year. SUBJECTS/METHODS: We measured RQ and RMR in 341 adults using indirect calorimetry, along with body weight/body composition using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometery, energy expenditure using an arm-based activity monitor and energy intake using dietary recalls. Participants were classified into low, moderate or high RQ and RMR (adjusted for age, sex, race and body composition) groups according to tertiles by sex. Follow-up measurements were completed every 3 months. RESULTS: Individuals with a high RQ had larger gains in body weight and fat mass compared with individuals with a low/moderate RQ at month 3, and increases in fat mass were more than double among individuals with a high RQ at 12 months (1.3 ± 3.0 vs 0.6 ± 3.7 kg, P = 0.03). Individuals with a low RMR did not gain more body weight nor fat mass compared with individuals with a moderate/high RMR.
    [Show full text]
  • A Carbon Monoxide Transport Model of the Human Respiratory System Applied to …
    A Carbon Monoxide Transport Model of The Human Respiratory System Applied to … A Carbon Monoxide Transport Model Cyro Albuquerque Neto of the Human Respiratory System [email protected] Applied to Urban Atmosphere Jurandir Itizo Yanagihara Senior Member, ABCM Exposure Analysis [email protected] The aim of this work is to analyze the carbon monoxide (CO) transport in the human body submitted to several physical activity levels. A complete mathematical model of the human respiratory system was developed, considering the exchanges of CO, oxygen (O2) and Fábio Turri carbon dioxide (CO2) in the lung, blood and tissues. The human body was divided in the [email protected] following compartments: alveolar, pulmonary capillaries, arterial, venous, tissue capillary University of Sao Paulo - USP and tissues. The gas transport in the blood and tissues is represented by empirical Escola Politécnica equations. The physiological parameters were described in function of physical activity. Department of Mechanical Engineering The model was validated by comparing its results with experimental data of controlled CO 055809-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil exposition. The agreement was excellent. CO concentration curves for critical days of São Caetano do Sul city (SP, Brazil) atmosphere were used as model input. The simulation results for some physical activities show that the more intense the activity, the larger the blood carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) level variations. The COHb level was compared with a CO quality air criteria, which showed to be adequate for low and moderate physical activity levels. Keywords: compartment model, carbon monoxide, gas transport, respiratory system, air pollution The models of Selvakumar, Sharan and Singh (1992) and Introduction Sharan and Selvakumar (1999) divide the lung into compartments, one alveolar and several pulmonary capillaries.
    [Show full text]