DOCSLIB.ORG

To Download the PDF File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
To Download the PDF File NOTE TO USERS Page(s) not included in the original manuscript and are unavailable from the author or university. The manuscript was scanned as received. 286-292 This reproduction is the best copy available. ® UMI Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Subjects, Comrades, and Citizens: Imperial, Bolshevik, and Post-Soviet Foundings in the Russian Citizenship Tradition By Peter Waisberg, M. A. A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science Carleton University Ottawa, Canada November 2006 © copyright Peter Waisberg 2006 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Library and Bibliotheque et Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-27117-9 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-27117-9 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce,Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve,sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet,distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform,et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation. reproduced without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne Privacy Act some supporting sur la protection de la vie privee, forms may have been removed quelques formulaires secondaires from this thesis. ont ete enleves de cette these. While these forms may be includedBien que ces formulaires in the document page count, aient inclus dans la pagination, their removal does not represent il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant. any loss of content from the thesis. i * i Canada Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Abstract This study examines the development of the Russian citizenship regime over time as an institution. It focuses on three historical moments, which constitute foundings in the otherwise incremental development of the citizenship regime. Each begins with a pivotal event, which serves as a departure point for the foundation of a new political order. Implicit in each is the restructuring of relations between the state and its population, the redefinition of membership and redrawing of borders. It is argued that the Great Reforms of the 1860s in Imperial Russia, the October Revolution of 1917, and the Collapse of Communism in 1991 each constitute the formation of a particular modem political order. Each is taken as both an individual case and a single iteration in a cumulative process. Each has its own dynamic configuration of recognized citizenship claims (rights) made by individuals on the state or its agents and a set of claims made by the state against its populace through its characteristic means of extracting resources, progressively understood as the fulfillment of citizenship duties. The shape of these borders, rights, and duties is arrived at through asymmetrical, informal bargaining between the state and mobilized groups within society. The investigation of this bargaining process considers the pressures on the state from the international system, capacity of the state to administer its territories and populations, and the participatory capacity of the public sphere. The goal of the research is to broaden the approach to citizenship issues, so as to bring the Russian case into the mainstream of citizenship studies. iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank my supervisor, Andrea Chandler, for her guidance and support at every stage of this project. I would like to acknowledge the advice and suggestions of the other members of my committee, Waller Newell and Jeff Sahadeo. Thanks are also due to Geoffrey Kellow, Susan Decker, Craig Smillie and, Sarah Earl for their friendship and help over the course of this long process. I would also like to express my gratitude to my family and especially my mother for her enduring encouragement. Finally, my deepest debt of gratitude is owed to Rafal Kulczycki, for everything. iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Contents Abstract iii Acknowledgements iv Introduction 1 Chapter 1. From Imperial Subject to Imperial Citizen? 47 Chapter 2. Revolutionary Citizenship 129 Chapter 3. Out of the Ashes: The Post Soviet Citizenship Regime 200 Conclusion 286 Bibliography 293 v Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reform, Revolution, and Collapse: Three Paths to Modern Citizenship in the Russian Experience Introduction ... the senseless dream o f participation by zemstvo representatives in affairs o f internal administration. Let all know that I ... shall safeguard the principles of autocracy as firmly and as unswervingly as my late, unforgettable father.” Tsar Nicholas II, January 1895. Democracy means equality. The great significance of the proletariat’s struggle for equality and o f equality as a slogan will be clear if we correctly interpret it as meaning the abolition of classes. Vladimir Lenin, State and Revolution A strong state should extend a hand to citizens where it is treacherous and frightening, where trouble looms, hi turn, the state also needs a great deal from society. Besides democratic guarantees and correct international policy, it needs decency and discipline form citizens. Boris Yeltsin, The Struggle for Russia These quotes capture three distinct moments in the development of modem citizenship in Russia. Each conveys the particular tensions internal to a distinct encounter with modem politics and the challenges it poses for state-citizens relations. The story of the Russian citizenship tradition is one punctuated by three great upheavals which reordered the relations between the state and its citizens. Tsar Nicholas II expressed his deeply held belief in an autocracy that could not admit the devolution of political right to its subjects, even in the midst of modernization. Vladimir Lenin asserts that democracy and equality will only be possible with the erasure of class distinctions. Boris Yeltsin groped for a new reciprocal understanding between state and citizen. The most recent reconfiguration of Russian citizenship following the collapse of the USSR, with its attendant impact on the rights, duties, and identities it confers, has received scant scholarly attention. This is both surprising and unfortunate because of what citizenship can tell us about the paths of development followed by Russia. This 1 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. absence could be explained by a failure to take Russian citizenship seriously, based on the assumption that throughout their history Russians have enjoyed few rights and have encountered great difficulties when they have attempted to exercise them and that this state of affairs has remained constant up to the present day. As this work will demonstrate, the citizenships resulting from Russia’s successive encounters with modem politics have been more formal than substantive. However, it does not necessarily follow that these institutions are without consequence. As I argue below, it would be more fruitful to treat this assumption as an empirical question, so that the meaning and content of Russian citizenship is not prejudged and its significance may be revealed. As I will elaborate below, I take modem citizenship to be that set of relations between the state and its citizens comprised of the legitimate claims made by a state upon its citizens, commonly understood as citizenship duties, and the reciprocal, legitimate claims that citizens make upon their states, commonly understood as citizenship rights. These rights and duties are formalized in laws and constitutions. Citizenship operates through a direct relationship between the state (and its agents) and individual citizens. It is distinct from subjecthood in that citizens are enjoined both to rale and be ruled. It is distinct from ancient citizenship by the existence of a civil society that is autonomous from the state and in the logic of equality that issues from it. The citizenry is understood as the limited and exclusive membership of the political community, equal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT 2013 by Nils Muižnieks
    Strasbourg, 18 September 2013 CommDH(2013)16 2ND QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT 2013 by Nils Muižnieks Commissioner for Human Rights 1 April to 30 June 2013 Presented to the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly CommDH(2013)16 CONTENTS 1. Overview ....................................................................................................... 3 2. Missions and Visits ....................................................................................... 4 3. Reports and continuous dialogue................................................................ 10 4. Themes ....................................................................................................... 14 5. Other Meetings ........................................................................................... 17 6. Human rights defenders .............................................................................. 18 7. Communication and Information work ......................................................... 19 8. Next three months ....................................................................................... 21 9. Observations and reflections ...................................................................... 22 2 CommDH(2013)16 1. Overview In the second quarter of 2013, I touched upon issues related to police misconduct in a number of country visits, reports and media interventions pertaining to Greece, Russia, Spain, Azerbaijan and Turkey. News reports suggest that the issue is not confined to these countries, but is widespread throughout
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr
    BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION EDITED BY DR. HANS-GEORG WIECK AND STEPHAN MALERIUS VILNIUS 2011 UDK 327(476+4) Be-131 BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION Authors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Dr. Vitali Silitski, Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann, Andrei Yahorau, Dr. Svetlana Matskevich, Valeri Fadeev, Dr. Andrei Kazakevich, Dr. Mikhail Pastukhou, Leonid Kalitenya, Alexander Chubrik Editors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Stephan Malerius This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. Sole responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication rests with the authors. The Centre for European Studies, the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility either for the information contained in the publication or its subsequent use. ISBN 978-609-95320-1-1 © 2011, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin / Berlin © Front cover photo: Jan Brykczynski CONTENTS 5 | Consultancy PROJECT: BELARUS AND THE EU Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck 13 | BELARUS IN AN INTERnational CONTEXT Dr. Vitali Silitski 22 | THE EU and BELARUS – A Relationship WITH RESERvations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann 34 | CIVIL SOCIETY: AN analysis OF THE situation AND diRECTIONS FOR REFORM Andrei Yahorau 53 | Education IN BELARUS: REFORM AND COOPERation WITH THE EU Dr. Svetlana Matskevich 70 | State bodies, CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY AND FORMS OF RULE Valeri Fadeev 79 | JudiciaRY AND law
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIA WATCH Duncan Deville, Guest Editor Graham T
    RUSSIA WATCH Duncan DeVille, Guest Editor Graham T. Allison, Director Analysis and Commentary Danielle Lussier, Assistant Editor Strengthening Democratic Institutions Project Editorial Staff: Melissa Carr, David John F. Kennedy School of Government Rekhviashvili, Annaliis Abrego, John Harvard University No. 7, March 2002 Grennan Rule of Law in Russia: The Wild East No More? Russian support for U.S. efforts in The new Criminal the war on terrorism has surprised Procedure Code. Long many Western observers. But this advocated by Western legal was not the only recent surprise experts as an important step in the development of the rule of law, from Moscow Western — the new Criminal Procedure Code advocates for the rule of law in will divest power from Russia’s (continued on p. 3) Russia also had much to celebrate in the closing months of 2001. Under IN THIS ISSUE: strong prodding by President Sergei Stepashin, p. 9 Vladimir Putin, the Duma passed several impressive pieces Chairman of the Auditing Chamber of the Russian Federation of reform legislation, including an entirely new Criminal Rule of Law and the Peculiarities of Russia Procedure Code, a potentially revolutionary land reform * law, new shareholder protections in amendments to the Scott Boylan, p. 10 Joint Stock Company Law, and the first post-Soviet Labor Regional Director for Eurasia, U.S. Department of Justice Long Awaited Russian Criminal Procedure Code is Enacted Code. * All of these bills had been stalled in the State Stephen Handleman, p. 13 Duma since the mid-1990s despite — or because of — Time Magazine International former President Boris Yeltsin’s efforts to get them passed.
    [Show full text]
  • Trydiy FMO 2016.Indd
    ISSN 2219-2085 БЕЛОРУССКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ ТРУДЫ ФАКУЛЬТЕТА МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ Научный сборник Основан в 2010 году Выпуск VII МИНСК БГУ 2016 УДК 3(062.522)(082) Представлены научные статьи ведущих ученых факультета международных отношений Бело- русского государственного университета, в которых рассматриваются международные отношения и внешняя политика, международное право, мировые экономические процессы, межкультурная ком- муникация. Редакционная коллегия : доктор исторических наук, профессор В. Г. Шадурский (главный редактор); доктор исторических наук, доцент Л. М. Гайдукевич; доктор исторических наук, профессор А. А. Розанов; доктор исторических наук, профессор В. Е. Снапковский; доктор исторических наук, профессор А. А. Челядинский; доктор исторических наук, профессор А. В. Шарапо; кандидат исторических наук, доцент В. А. Острога; кандидат исторических наук, доцент А. В. Русакович; кандидат исторических наук А. В. Селиванов; доктор юридических наук, профессор С. А. Балашенко; доктор юридических наук, профессор Ю. П. Бровка; доктор юридических наук, профессор М. Ф. Чудаков; кандидат юридических наук, доцент Е. В. Бабкина; кандидат юридических наук, доцент А. Е. Вашкевич; кандидат юридических наук, доцент Е. Б. Леанович; кандидат юридических наук, доцент Ю. А. Лепешков; доктор экономических наук, доцент Е. Л. Давыденко; доктор экономических наук, профессор А. В. Данильченко; доктор экономических наук, профессор С. Ю. Солодовников; доктор экономических наук, профессор А. Е. Дайнеко; кандидат экономических наук, доцент
    [Show full text]
  • Concerns in Europe
    CONCERNS IN EUROPE January - June 1999 FOREWORD This bulletin contains information about Amnesty International’s main concerns in Europe between January and June 1999. Not every country in Europe is reported on: only those where there were significant developments in the period covered by the bulletin. The five Central Asian republics of Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan are included in the Europe Region because of their membership of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Reflecting the priority Amnesty International is giving to investigating and campaigning against human rights violations against women and children, the bulletin contains special sections on Women in Europe (p.76) and Children in Europe (p.79). A number of individual country reports have been issued on the concerns featured in this bulletin. References to these are made under the relevant country entry. In addition, more detailed information about particular incidents or concerns may be found in Urgent Actions and News Service Items issued by Amnesty International. This bulletin is published by Amnesty International every six months. References to previous bulletins in the text are: AI Index: EUR 01/01/99 Concerns in Europe: July - December 1998 AI Index: EUR 01/02/98 Concerns in Europe: January - June 1998 AI Index: EUR 01/01/98 Concerns in Europe: July - December 1997 AI Index: EUR 01/06/97 Concerns in Europe: January - June 1997 AI Index: EUR 01/01/97 Concerns in Europe: July - December 1996 AI Index: EUR 01/02/96 Concerns in Europe: January - June 1996 Amnesty International August 1999 AI Index: EUR 01/02/99 2 Concerns in Europe: January - June 1999 ARMENIA Prisoners of conscience (update to information in AI Index: EUR 01/01/99) At the end of the period under review at least nine young men remained imprisoned because their conscience led them into conflict with the law that makes military service compulsory for young males, and offers them no civilian alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Monitoring of Human Rights Center “Viasna” Concerning Tortures and Facts of Other Kinds of Inhumane Treatment Towards Citizens of Belarus
    REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2004 2 REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2004 PREAMBLE: CONCLUSIONS AND GENERALIZATIONS In 2004 the political situation in Belarus was distinguished by further worsening of the situation of human rights and the relations between the state and individuals. Regular and deliberate human rights violations became a necessary condition for the strengthening of the unlimited dictatorial power – infringements of human rights served as the funda¬ment for authoritarianism and were a favorable environment for the development of totalitarianism. One of the main factors that influenced the public and political situation in Belarus in 2004 was the Parliamentary election and the nationwide referendum concerning the possibility to prolong Aliaksandr Luka¬shenka’s presidential powers. The need for the liquidation of the cons¬ti¬tutional restriction of the number of possible presidential terms defined the state policy and influenced it in all circles of public life. This factor ma¬nifested in the sphere of human rights with the aggravation of the rep¬ressions against political opponents and prosecution of opposition-mindedness, enforcement of new discriminative legal acts, further limitation of the freedom of the press, violation of the liberty of peaceful assemblies and associations and other obstacles for the enjoyment of personal liberties by citizens of Belarus. Citizens of Belarus were deprived of the right to take part in the state government with the assistance of elected representatives. The election to the Chamber of Representatives wasn’t free and democratic. It was conducted according to the scenario that was prepared by the authorities in complete conformity with the “wishes” A.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Observation Guide
    ELECTION OBSERVATION GUIDE Prepared by the Republican Liberal Youth Organization «Civil Forum» on the basis of reports of its own observers What? Where? When? November 12 - 17, 2019 - date of elections (including early elections) in the House of Representatives of the 7th convocation of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus Based on the elections, 110 deputies were elected in the Lower House of the Belarusian Parliament "Civil Forum" in the elections The authorities recognized the elections «Civil Forum» participated in 2 components as valid. OSCE did not recognize in the parliamentary elections: election results Candidates for deputies. The organization nominated 1 candidate for deputy, the head of the largest media community of the Mogilev region (Mogilev Live) Alexander Irkho. The candidate was not elected to parliament. In addition, 12 independent candidates were trained at the organization’s trainings. - Observers: more than 20 observers from Civil Forum worked in polling stations in 4 cities of the country 77,22% , 3% more than in 2016 Turnout 11 representatives of the Communist Party 6 - from the Republican Party of Labor and Justice 2 - from the Patriotic Party 1 - from the Agrarian Party 1 - from the Liberal Democratic Party Parties in Parliament 89 - non-party Not a single candidate from independent forces or opposition parties has been elected Mogilev Central District №85, polling station №25 Reported offences: 1. Observers did not see 50% of the vote count. 2. The doors of the counting room were not closed during the procedure. After 20:00, strangers entered the hall. 3. Members of the commission stacked ballots in different piles, but they did not provide access to them for observers.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 166 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 No. 159 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. and was The community came together during per, who has been selected by the Ken- called to order by the Speaker pro tem- that flood, and I know they will once tucky Family Medicine as the State’s pore (Mr. MCGOVERN). again unite to tackle this tremendous top, young doctor. She is a native of f challenge. Russell County and a graduate of the Casey County is a resilient commu- University of Kentucky College of Med- DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO nity where people look out for each icine. For the past 3 years, she has TEMPORE other and help their neighbors in times practiced medicine in Russell County. The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- of need. As they continue to weather Dr. Cooper will receive the award at a fore the House the following commu- this challenge, I would like to encour- ceremony in Louisville on September nication from the Speaker: age anyone in or around Casey County 25. WASHINGTON, DC, to reach out to my office for any as- Mr. Speaker, I join with everyone in September 15, 2020. sistance they may need moving for- Russell County and throughout the I hereby appoint the Honorable JAMES P. ward. Commonwealth in honoring her on this MCGOVERN to act as Speaker pro tempore on HONORING TOMMY WILLETT outstanding statewide achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • John Dunlop “Storm in Moscow” a Plan of the El’Tsin “Family” to Destabilize Russia
    John Dunlop “Storm in Moscow” A Plan of the El’tsin “Family” to Destabilize Russia “Storm in Moscow” A Plan of the El’tsin “Family” to Destabilize Russia John B. Dunlop Hoover Institution CSSEO Working Paper No. 154 March 2012 Centro Studi sulla Storia dell’Europa Orientale Via Tonelli 13 – 38056 Levico Terme (Tn) Italy tel/fax: 0461 702137 e-mail: [email protected] John Dunlop “Storm in Moscow”: A Plan of the El’tsin “Family” to Destabilize Russia CSSEO Working Paper No. 154 March 2012 © 2012 by Centro Studi sulla Storia dell’Europa Orientale 2 “Truth always wins. The lie sooner or later evaporates and the truth remains.”1 (Boris El’tsin, Midnight Diaries, 2000) This paper was originally presented at an October 2004 seminar held at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Johns Hopkins University, Washington DC. The seminar was hosted by Professor Bruce Parrott, at the time Director of Russian and Eurasian Studies at SAIS. The essay was subsequently revised to take into consideration comments made by the seminar’s two discussants, Professor Peter Reddaway of George Washington University and Donald N. Jensen, Director of Communications at Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty in Washington (and currently Senior Fellow, Center for Transatlantic Relations, Voice of America). In March of 2005, the paper was posted on the SAIS web-site (sais-jhu.edu). Eventually the paper was retired from the jhu.edu web-site.2 By the current year, 2011, it had become clear that an updated and revised version of the paper was needed, one which would take into consideration significant new information which has come to light since 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 ESCTD Report
    ECONOMICS AND SECURITY COMMITTEE (ESC) Sub-Committee on Transition and Development (ESCTD) BELARUS: POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, AND DIPLOMATIC CHALLENGES Preliminary Draft Report Michal SZCZERBA (Poland) Rapporteur 019 ESCTD 21 E | Original: English | 16 April 2020 Founded in 1955, the NATO Parliamentary Assembly acts as a consultative interparliamentary organisation which is institutionally separate from NATO. This working document only represents the views of the Rapporteur until it has been adopted by the Economics and Security Committee. It is based on information from publicly available sources or NATO PA meetings – which are all unclassified. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: THE EMERGENCE OF A BELARUSIAN STATE .................................. 1 II. A HYBRID AND HIGHLY POLITICISED ECONOMIC MODEL .......................................... 2 III. BELARUSIAN IDENTITY ................................................................................................... 3 IV. THE 2020 ELECTIONS ..................................................................................................... 4 V. THE BELARUSIAN POLITICAL OPPOSITION, MASS DEMONSTRATIONS AND THE LEADING ROLE PLAYED BY WOMEN ..................................................................... 5 VI. GEOPOLITICS, THE BELARUSIAN DEMOCRACY MOVEMENT AND RUSSIA .............. 8 VII. THE ENERGY CARD AND THE UNION STATE ............................................................... 9 VIII. RUSSIA AND THE 2020 BELARUSIAN PROTESTS ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inside and Around the Kremlin's Black Box
    Inside and Around the Kremlin’s Black Box: The New Nationalist Think Tanks in Russia Marlène Laruelle STOCKHOLM PAPER October 2009 Inside and Around the Kremlin’s Black Box The New Nationalist Think Tanks in Russia Marlène Laruelle Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 131 30 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden ww.isdp.eu Inside and Around the Kremlin’s Black Box: The New Nationalist Think Tanks in Rus- sia is a Stockholm Paper published by the Institute for Security and Development Policy. The Stockholm Papers Series is an Occasional Paper series addressing topical and timely issues in international affairs. The Institute is based in Stockholm, Sweden, and cooperates closely with research centers worldwide. The Institute is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy- watchers, business leaders, and journalists. It is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion. This publication is kindly made possible by support from the Swedish Ministry for For- eign Affairs. The opinions and conclusions expressed are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute for Security and Development Policy or its sponsors. © Institute for Security and Development Policy, 2009 ISBN: 978-91-85937-67-7 Printed in Singapore Distributed in Europe by: Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 131 30 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden Tel. +46-841056953; Fax.
    [Show full text]
  • INFO PACK Understanding the Proposed Amendments to The
    INFO PACK Understanding the Proposed Amendments to the Russian Constitution: Power Grab or Institutional Fortification? INFO PACK Understanding the Proposed Amendments to the Russian Constitution: Power Grab or Institutional Fortification? Aruuke Uran Kyzy Understanding the Proposed Amendments to the Russian Constitution: Power Grab or Institutional Fortification? © TRT WORLD RESEARCH CENTRE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PUBLISHER TRT WORLD RESEARCH CENTRE May 2020 WRITTEN BY Aruuke Uran Kyzy PHOTO CREDIT ANADOLU AGENCY TRT WORLD İSTANBUL AHMET ADNAN SAYGUN STREET NO:83 34347 ULUS, BEŞİKTAŞ İSTANBUL / TURKEY TRT WORLD LONDON 200 GRAYS INN ROAD, WC1X 8XZ LONDON / UNITED KINGDOM TRT WORLD WASHINGTON D.C. 1819 L STREET NW SUITE, 700 20036 WASHINGTON DC / UNITED STATES www.trtworld.com researchcentre.trtworld.com The opinions expressed in this Info Pack represent the views of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the TRT World Research Centre. 4 Understanding the Proposed Amendments to the Russian Constitution: Power Grab or Institutional Fortification? Introduction he purpose of this info pack is to upper house). There he spoke about the strengthen- compile existing research on official ing of the role of parliament and the cancellation of Russian statements and aggregate the phrase ‘consecutive’ from the article banning relevant data on the proposed consti- any person from serving as president of the Russian T tutional amendment. This info-pack Federation for more than two consecutive terms. explores: (i) the shifts in the distribution of power This step would ensure that Russia’s presidents in between the presidential and legislative branches the future would face more institutional constraints of government, (ii) securing the prevalence of the than does Putin himself.
    [Show full text]