CALIFORNIA COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION OUTCOMES
2013 ELECTIONS
City Offices and Ballot Measures
Institute for Social Research Center For California Studies California State University, Sacramento
CALIFORNIA COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION OUTCOMES: CANDIDATES AND BALLOT MEASURES, 2013 ELECTIONS
CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES
Steve Boilard, Ph.D., Executive Director, Center for California Studies
David Barker, Ph.D., Director, Institute for Social Research
Valory Messier Research Specialist, Institute for Social Research
Sara Adan Graduate Research Assistant, Institute for Social Research
Center for California Studies Institute for Social Research California State University, Sacramento California State University, Sacramento 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819-6081 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819-6101 (916) 278-6906 FAX: (916) 278-5199 (916) 278-5737 FAX: (916) 278-5150
Acknowledgements
The researchers would like to sincerely thank the county elections officials and staff throughout the State of California who took time to provide data to the project. Additionally, we are grateful to the Secretary of State’s Office for its continuing support and interest in this project. Without their assistance, the completion of these yearly reviews and the California Elections Data Archive would not be possible.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION...... i
2013 County, City and School District Election Dates by County ...... iii
Trend Table A Number of Ballot Measures, Percent of Total Measures, and Percent Passing by Type, Jurisdiction and Year ...... iv
Trend Table B Number of Ballot Measures, Percent of Total Measures, and Percent Passing by Topic, Jurisdiction and Year...... vii
Trend Table C Community Service District and County Service Area Measures by County ...... x
Trend Table D Number of Community Service District and County Service Area Measures, Percent of Total County Measures, and Percent Passing by Type and Year ...... xii
Trend Table E Comparison of Pass Rates for County-Wide and Community Service District/County Service Area Tax Measures, 1998-2013 ...... xiii
Trend Table F Number of Community Service District and County Service Area Ballot Measures, Percent of Total County Measures, and Percent Passing by Topic and Year ...... xiv
Trend Table G Number of Candidates by Jurisdiction and Year ...... xv
Trend Table H Number of Candidates for Major County Offices by Year ...... xv
Trend Table I Percent of Incumbent Candidates and Percent of Prevailing Incumbents by Major Office, Jurisdiction and Year ...... xvi
2013 ELECTION SERIES SUMMARY: ELECTION OUTCOMES FOR COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT BALLOT MEASURES AND CANDIDATES ...... 1
Table A Summary of Outcomes for All County, City and School District Ballot Measures by Type of Measure and County, 2013 ...... 3
Table B Summary of Outcomes for All County, City and School District Ballot Measures by Topic of Measure and County, 2013 ...... 4
Table C Summary of Election Outcomes for All County, City and School District Offices, 2013 ...... 5
PART 1 VOTE TOTALS, ELECTION OUTCOMES AND TEXT FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES ...... 7
Table 1.1 Vote Totals for City Ballot Measures by County, 2013 ...... 9
Table 1.2 Text for City Ballot Measures by County, 2013 ...... 13
Table 1.3 Summary of Election Outcomes for City Ballot Measures by Type of Measure and County, 2013 ...... 20
Table 1.4 Summary of Election Outcomes for City Ballot Measures by Topic of Measure and County, 2013 ...... 21
PART 2 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES ...... 23
Table 2.1 Vote Totals for City Office Candidates by County and Election Date, 2013 ...... 25
Table 2.2 Summary of Election Outcomes for City Offices, 2013 ...... 50
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── i
CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS DA T A ARCHIVE
INTRODUCTION
The California Elections Data Archive (CEDA) is a joint project of the Center for California Studies and the Institute for Social Research, at the California State University, Sacramento and the office of the California Secretary of State. The purpose of CEDA is to provide researchers, citizens, public agencies and other interested parties with a single repository of local election data. With over 6,000 local jurisdictions in California, the task of monitoring local elections is nearly impossible for individuals. CEDA addresses this problem through the creation of a single, cost- effective and easily accessible source of local election data. CEDA includes candidate and ballot measure results for county, city, community college, and school district elections throughout the State. CEDA thus represents the only comprehensive repository of local election results in California and one of a very few such databases on local elections in the U.S.
How the CEDA Data is Collected and Reported
Election data are collected periodically throughout each calendar year. This enables CEDA to incorporate results from special elections as well as all regularly scheduled elections. Election results from counties, cities, and community college and school districts are entered in the CEDA database from which three standard CEDA reports are generated. These reports include:
• County Elections: Candidates, ballot designations, and vote totals for all elected county offices; vote totals and text for county ballot measures.
• City Elections: Candidates, ballot designations, and vote totals for all elected city offices; vote totals and text for all city ballot measures.
• Community College and School District Elections: Candidates, ballot designations, and vote totals for all elective community college and school district offices; vote totals and text for all district ballot measures.
Ballot measures for all jurisdictions are coded according to type (e.g., charter amendment, taxes, bond measure, initiative, etc.) and to topic (e.g., education, public safety, governance, etc.).
ii ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES
THE CEDA PARTNERSHIP
THE CENTER FOR CA L I F O R N I A STUDIES
Located at California State University, Sacramento, the Center for California Studies is a public policy, public service and curricular support unit of the California State University. The Center’s location in the state Capital and its ability to draw upon the resources of the entire State University system give it a unique capacity for making contributions to public policy development and the public life of California. Center programs cover four broad areas: administration of the nationally known Assembly, Senate, Executive, and Judicial Administration Fellowship Programs; university- state government liaison and applied policy research; civic education and community service through forums, conferences and issue dialogues; and curricular support activity in the interdisciplinary field of California Studies.
INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH
Established in 1989, the Institute for Social Research (ISR) is a multidisciplinary institute that is committed to advancing the understanding of the social world through applied research. The Institute offers research expertise and technical assistance serving as a resource to agencies, organizations, the University and the broader community. Services provided by the Institute include research and sampling design, measurement, coding and data entry, computer assisted telephone and field interviewing, mailed and Internet surveys, focus groups, data base management, statistical analysis and report production. ISR has completed numerous projects with more than 50 federal, state and community agencies, several private firms and many administrative units of the university. Faculty affiliates of the Institute offer specific content expertise in a wide variety of disciplines, including the social sciences, health and human services, engineering and education.
CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE
The Secretary of State is, among other duties, California's chief elections officer with the responsibility of administering the provisions of the Elections Code. The Secretary must compile state election returns and issue certificates of election to winning candidates; compile the returns and certify the results of initiative and referendum elections; certify acts delayed by referendum, and prepare and file a statement of vote. Recent legislation permits but does not mandate that the Secretary of State compile local election results.
2013 COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION DATES BY COUNTY 2/26 3/5 3/12 3/26 4/2 4/9 4/16 5/5 5/7 5/14 5/21 6/4 6/11 6/18 6/25 7/2 7/16 7/23 7/30 8/27 9/10 11/5 11/19 12/17 ALAMEDA CONTRA COSTA EL DORADO FRESNO HUMBOLDT IMPERIAL KERN KINGS LAKE LASSEN LOS ANGELES MARIN MENDOCINO MERCED MONTEREY NAPA ORANGE PLUMAS RIVERSIDE SAN BENITO SAN BERNARDINO SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOAQUIN SAN MATEO SANTA CLARA SANTA CRUZ SISKIYOU SOLANO SONOMA STANISLAUS TRINITY TULARE VENTURA
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────iii iv ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES
TREND TABLE A NUMBER OF BALLOT MEASURES, PERCENT OF TOTAL MEASURES, AND PERCENT PASSING BY TYPE, JURISDICTION AND YEAR
All Measures Bonds Taxes Ordinance Recalls Initiatives Charter Amendment Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean % of All Percent % of All Percent % of All Percent % of All Percent % of All Percent % of All Percent % of All Percent Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures
All Measures
1995-2013 395 100 64 102 26 68 117 30 57 86 22 61 15 4 71 9 2 50 48 12 76 Even Years 582 100 65 156 27 70 168 29 54 133 23 61 17 3 71 13 2 50 68 12 75 Odd Years 227 100 62 53 23 61 72 32 63 44 19 61 14 6 71 5 2 50 29 13 78 County
1995-2013 63 16 57 2 3 66 25 40 44 20 32 63 2 3 72 2 3 54 7 10 65 Even Years 102 18 54 2 2 59 42 41 41 33 33 62 2 2 53 4 4 48 11 11 63 Odd Years 28 12 67 2 6 75 10 37 55 8 29 70 2 8 86 1 2 83 2 8 70 City
1995-2013 198 50 64 5 3 58 67 34 59 59 30 58 7 4 74 7 3 49 41 21 78 Even Years 292 50 63 8 3 61 99 34 57 92 32 59 10 3 72 9 3 51 57 20 77 Odd Years 113 50 65 3 2 52 38 33 63 30 26 55 5 4 76 4 4 44 27 24 78 School District
1995-2013 134 34 68 95 71 68 25 19 62 7 5 79 6 4 68 0 0 50 Even Years 187 32 70 146 78 71 27 14 60 8 4 80 5 3 75 Odd Years 86 38 63 49 56 61 24 28 64 6 7 77 7 8 63 0 0 100
TREND TABLE A NUMBER OF BALLOT MEASURES, PERCENT OF TOTAL MEASURES, AND PERCENT PASSING BY TYPE, JURISDICTION AND YEAR All Measures Bonds Taxes Ordinance Recalls Initiatives Charter Amendment Number Number of % of All Pass of % of All Number of % of All Pass Number of % of All Pass Number of % of All Number of % of All Number of % of All Pass Measures Measures Rate Measures Measures Pass Rate Measures Measures Rate Measures Measures Rate Measures Measures Pass Rate Measures Measures Pass Rate Measures Measures Rate 1995 253 100 37 91 36 47 26 10 35 46 18 61 8 3 88 8 3 50 55 22 93 1996 573 100 57 64 11 59 142 25 40 176 31 58 32 6 72 18 3 39 115 20 73 1997 342 100 60 127 37 59 100 29 56 45 13 69 29 8 38 7 2 71 31 9 81 1998 572 100 61 144 25 58 162 28 48 115 20 58 19 3 74 9 2 56 94 16 77 1999 283 100 60 107 38 59 54 19 57 68 24 57 14 5 71 10 4 40 20 7 50 2000 559 100 58 135 24 60 122 22 39 154 28 58 11 2 100 21 4 67 79 14 67 2001 233 100 70 73 31 75 68 29 72 33 14 58 21 9 71 1 0 100 25 11 60
2002 657 100 68 245 37 76 155 24 54 136 21 54 8 1 63 10 2 40 77 12 77 2003 178 100 63 22 12 55 62 35 48 47 26 70 9 5 89 5 3 40 24 13 75 2004 712 100 63 179 25 75 258 36 47 144 20 64 11 2 73 14 2 29 72 10 79 2005 295 100 64 57 19 74 111 38 58 59 20 54 11 4 82 7 2 43 35 12 89 All Measures . 2006 556 100 62 185 33 59 142 26 56 123 22 63 17 3 29 22 4 36 39 7 82 2007 179 100 72 22 12 55 61 34 74 40 22 58 13 7 100 1 1 0 38 21 79 2008 593 100 75 201 34 82 188 32 67 123 21 65 12 2 58 11 2 91 39 7 90 2009 193 100 63 6 3 33 99 51 67 35 18 63 13 7 69 3 2 33 20 10 60 2010 482 100 67 97 20 70 164 34 60 117 24 67 27 6 78 11 2 55 50 10 76 2011 172 100 72 10 6 80 75 44 67 29 17 72 16 9 75 2 1 0 31 18 81 2012 530 100 72 156 29 81 178 34 69 112 21 62 14 3 93 2 0 50 51 10 63 2013 137 100 72 11 8 73 65 47 78 34 25 50 8 6 88 4 3 100 11 8 73 1995 17 7 53 6 35 33 2 12 0 6 35 83 1996 114 20 44 3 3 33 34 30 26 41 36 54 5 4 80 7 6 14 17 15 47 1997 24 7 63 7 29 57 7 29 71 4 17 100 2 8 50 4 17 25 1998 125 22 59 1 1 0 53 42 40 32 26 75 4 3 25 25 20 76 1999 38 13 63 1 3 100 21 55 48 8 21 63 4 11 100 2000 116 21 49 6 5 83 51 44 27 28 24 50 8 7 88 8 7 38 2001 37 16 73 3 8 100 14 38 71 11 30 64 4 11 75 1 3 0
2002 98 15 56 5 5 20 38 39 45 39 40 67 1 1 0 2 2 50 7 7 71 2003 28 16 64 12 43 25 15 54 100 1 4 0 2004 140 20 54 0 2 0 60 43 45 47 34 62 1 1 0 4 3 25 18 13 56 2005 57 19 63 3 5 67 24 42 67 16 28 56 3 5 100 3 5 67 2 4 50
County Measures 2006 95 17 52 45 47 40 30 32 60 4 4 25 2 2 50 6 6 83 2007 29 16 76 1 3 100 3 10 67 16 55 63 8 28 100 2008 90 15 62 3 3 100 33 37 42 40 44 65 1 1 100 2 2 100 4 4 100 2009 16 8 69 4 25 50 6 38 67 1 6 100 2 13 100 2010 64 13 53 3 5 67 25 39 48 22 34 59 4 6 50 2 3 50 6 9 50 2011 20 12 80 1 5 100 7 35 71 4 20 75 2 10 100 3 15 67 2012 76 14 63 1 1 100 39 51 59 20 26 60 1 1 100 2 3 50 10 13 70 2013 12 9 75 5 42 40 1 8 100 3 25 100 1 8 100
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES─────────────────────────────────── ───────────── ─────────── ──────────────────────────────v vi ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES TREND TABLE A NUMBER OF BALLOT MEASURES, PERCENT OF TOTAL MEASURES, AND PERCENT PASSING BY TYPE, JURISDICTION AND YEAR All Measures Bonds Taxes Ordinance Recalls Initiatives Charter Amendment Number Number of % of All Pass of % of All Number of % of All Pass Number of % of All Pass Number of % of All Number of % of All Number of % of All Pass Measures Measures Rate Measures Measures Pass Rate Measures Measures Rate Measures Measures Rate Measures Measures Pass Rate Measures Measures Pass Rate Measures Measures Rate 1995 119 47 71 4 3 75 7 6 29 38 32 58 7 6 43 49 41 94 1996 374 65 60 10 3 30 100 27 43 115 31 59 24 6 79 11 3 55 98 26 78 1997 144 42 58 2 1 50 70 49 50 28 19 54 9 6 22 7 5 71 27 19 89 1998 283 49 60 9 3 78 99 35 47 78 28 53 7 2 43 5 2 80 69 24 77 1999 114 40 54 4 4 75 22 19 55 48 42 48 8 7 100 10 9 40 16 14 38 2000 297 53 60 11 4 82 65 22 45 113 38 56 6 2 100 13 4 54 71 24 70 2001 93 40 69 8 9 63 31 33 74 18 19 61 3 3 100 1 1 100 24 26 63
2002 309 47 60 12 4 83 102 33 58 94 30 48 5 2 60 8 3 38 70 23 77 2003 89 50 67 2 2 50 14 16 71 29 33 55 6 7 100 5 6 40 24 27 75 2004 337 47 59 7 2 43 147 44 46 92 27 63 6 2 67 10 3 30 54 16 87 2005 135 46 61 2 1 0 47 35 55 37 27 51 3 2 33 4 3 25 33 24 91 City Measures 2006 253 46 64 10 4 50 82 32 70 85 34 61 6 2 17 20 8 35 33 13 82 2007 108 60 71 2 2 0 40 37 73 19 18 53 5 5 100 1 1 0 38 35 79 2008 258 44 73 5 2 100 111 43 71 80 31 65 8 3 38 9 3 89 35 14 89 2009 130 67 61 1 1 0 63 48 68 28 22 61 3 2 33 3 2 33 18 14 56 2010 270 56 71 2 1 0 95 35 69 91 34 67 16 6 94 8 3 63 44 16 80 2011 105 61 74 37 35 65 23 22 70 10 10 100 2 2 0 28 27 82 2012 248 47 67 5 2 20 93 38 72 83 33 58 12 5 92 41 17 61 2013 90 66 68 44 49 77 30 33 53 3 3 67 1 1 100 10 11 70 1995 117 46 52 87 74 46 13 11 38 6 5 100 8 7 88 1 1 100 1996 85 15 62 51 60 67 8 9 63 20 24 60 3 4 0 1997 174 51 62 118 68 59 23 13 70 13 7 92 18 10 44 1998 164 29 62 134 82 57 10 6 100 5 3 40 12 7 92 1999 131 46 62 102 78 58 11 8 82 12 9 92 6 5 33 2000 146 26 63 118 81 57 6 4 67 13 9 92 5 3 100
2001 103 44 71 62 60 76 23 22 70 4 4 25 14 14 64 2002 250 38 76 228 91 77 15 6 53 3 1 100 2 1 100 2003 61 34 52 20 33 55 36 59 47 3 5 67 2 3 100 2004 235 33 73 172 73 77 51 22 53 5 2 100 4 2 100 2005 103 35 69 52 50 77 40 39 55 6 6 67 5 5 100 2006 208 37 58 175 84 59 15 7 27 8 4 88 7 3 43
School District Measures 2007 42 23 67 19 45 58 18 43 78 5 12 60 2008 245 41 80 193 79 81 44 18 75 3 1 67 3 1 100 2009 47 24 66 5 11 40 32 68 66 1 2 100 9 19 78 2010 148 31 64 92 62 72 44 30 45 4 3 100 7 5 57 1 1 0 2011 47 27 64 9 19 78 31 66 68 2 4 100 4 9 0 2012 206 39 82 150 73 83 46 22 72 9 4 100 1 0 100 2013 35 26 80 11 31 73 16 46 94 4 11 25 4 11 100
TREND TABLE B NUMBER OF BALLOT MEASURES, PERCENT OF TOTAL MEASURES, AND PERCENT PASSING BY TOPIC, JURISDICTION AND YEAR All Measures Education Governance Land Use Public Safety Public Facilities General Services Transportation Revenue
Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean % of All Percent % of All Percent % of All Percent % of All Percent % of All Percent % of All Percent % of All Percent % of All Percent % of All Percent Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Passing Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures All Measures
1995-2013 395 100 64 134 34 68 91 23 69 31 8 55 23 6 54 19 5 55 13 3 64 10 3 55 52 13 64
Even Years 582 100 64 188 32 70 135 23 68 47 8 57 36 6 54 30 5 52 16 3 66 16 3 57 79 14 60
Odd Years 227 100 65 86 38 63 52 23 73 17 8 51 11 5 56 9 4 63 11 5 62 5 2 49 28 12 73 County
1995-2013 63 16 57 1 1 82 18 28 69 6 10 47 8 12 45 7 12 50 4 6 67 6 10 61 7 12 49
Even Years 102 18 54 1 1 71 28 27 65 10 10 47 13 13 43 12 11 42 5 5 65 10 10 60 12 12 47
Odd Years 28 12 67 0 1 100 9 31 78 2 8 43 3 11 53 3 12 74 3 10 69 3 10 66 3 10 55 City
1995-2013 198 50 64 1 1 73 73 37 69 24 12 60 15 8 59 12 6 58 9 5 64 4 2 44 44 22 66
Even Years 292 50 63 2 1 80 107 37 68 34 12 64 23 8 60 18 6 58 11 4 67 5 2 52 66 23 63
Odd Years 113 50 65 1 1 57 42 37 72 15 13 53 8 7 57 6 5 58 8 7 60 2 2 27 25 22 62 School District
1995-2013 134 34 68 131 97 64 1 1 68 0 0 50
Even Years 187 32 70 182 97 64 1 0 40 0 0 50
Odd Years 86 38 63 84 98 63 1 2 79
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────vii viii ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES TREND TABLE B NUMBER OF BALLOT MEASURES, PERCENT OF TOTAL MEASURES, AND PERCENT PASSING BY TOPIC, JURISDICTION AND YEAR
All Measures Education Governance Land Use Public Safety Public Facilities General Services Transportation Revenue Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing 1995 253 100 61 121 48 54 63 25 84 16 6 63 12 5 50 14 6 50 0 0 0 2 1 0 5 2 60 1996 573 100 57 87 15 64 214 37 66 54 9 56 39 7 51 38 7 37 10 2 40 8 1 50 87 15 46 1997 342 100 60 175 51 62 43 13 67 19 6 68 12 4 42 15 4 40 38 11 61 4 1 50 10 3 70 1998 572 100 60 158 28 63 131 23 64 46 8 70 41 7 49 32 6 56 28 5 82 23 4 70 75 13 43 1999 283 100 59 119 42 59 62 22 63 29 10 41 14 5 57 4 1 75 14 5 57 8 3 88 23 8 65 2000 559 100 59 151 27 63 141 25 64 73 13 55 32 6 50 39 7 67 20 4 55 21 4 43 5 1 20 2001 233 100 70 105 45 71 46 20 67 7 3 71 11 5 73 19 8 58 7 3 71 4 2 25 31 13 87
2002 657 100 65 250 38 76 144 22 66 44 7 43 42 6 57 35 5 49 20 3 60 10 2 40 85 13 62 2003 178 100 62 61 34 52 52 29 73 15 8 60 12 7 50 5 3 60 6 3 100 8 4 38 13 7 62 2004 712 100 62 238 33 72 139 20 73 58 8 52 55 8 47 37 5 38 23 3 70 25 4 76 110 15 47 2005 295 100 64 102 35 70 61 21 70 28 9 39 18 6 44 14 5 64 18 6 67 13 4 62 33 11 70 All Measures 2006 556 100 60 208 37 58 109 20 60 51 9 61 37 7 73 22 4 41 12 2 58 22 4 50 61 11 62 2007 179 100 71 42 23 67 63 35 81 18 10 39 5 3 100 8 4 88 7 4 86 4 2 25 31 17 68 2008 593 100 74 246 41 80 99 17 74 43 7 72 39 7 49 32 5 66 10 2 80 14 2 50 92 16 77 2009 193 100 63 47 24 66 42 22 64 17 9 47 10 5 60 7 4 86 8 4 25 2 1 0 56 29 71 2010 482 100 66 149 31 64 138 29 74 30 6 47 27 6 67 12 2 75 9 2 56 7 1 71 95 20 65 2011 172 100 72 48 28 65 59 12 81 8 2 75 9 2 56 5 1 100 4 1 50 2 0 50 34 7 74 2012 530 100 72 209 39 82 98 20 71 23 5 57 13 3 38 23 5 57 11 2 73 12 2 50 99 21 79 2013 137 100 72 35 26 80 28 6 71 14 3 50 9 2 67 4 1 50 4 1 50 39 8 79
1995 17 7 53 7 41 71 3 18 33 3 18 67 1 6 0 3 18 33 1996 114 20 44 1 1 100 44 39 59 12 11 33 8 7 38 16 14 13 1 1 100 4 4 75 16 14 31 1997 24 7 63 1 4 100 5 21 60 3 13 100 2 8 0 5 21 40 5 21 80 1 4 100 1 4 0 1998 125 22 59 25 20 76 13 10 62 14 11 36 12 10 33 18 14 72 16 13 75 12 10 25 1999 38 13 63 5 13 80 3 8 33 3 8 67 7 18 29 8 21 88 7 18 86 2000 116 21 49 1 1 100 22 19 64 17 15 35 14 12 36 16 14 44 8 7 63 16 14 44 3 3 33 2001 37 16 73 2 5 100 12 32 58 1 3 100 7 19 100 6 16 67 4 11 75 1 3 0 4 11 75
2002 98 15 56 34 35 71 7 7 71 15 15 33 11 11 36 7 7 57 5 5 40 12 12 67 2003 28 16 64 10 36 90 5 18 40 2 7 100 2 7 50 6 21 17 2004 140 20 54 3 2 33 32 23 66 14 10 14 22 16 50 13 9 54 4 3 50 21 15 76 17 12 41 2005 57 19 63 12 21 67 6 11 33 6 11 33 8 14 75 9 16 78 9 16 78 4 7 50
County Measures County 2006 95 17 52 28 29 54 10 11 70 11 12 55 8 8 38 2 2 50 15 16 40 12 13 33 2007 29 16 76 14 48 93 5 17 0 5 17 100 2 7 100 2 7 50 0 0 0 2008 90 15 62 1 1 100 25 28 76 7 8 86 14 16 43 14 16 50 4 4 75 7 8 57 11 12 64 2009 16 8 69 7 44 86 3 19 33 3 19 100 1 6 0 2 13 50 2010 64 13 53 23 36 57 6 9 50 12 19 50 2 3 100 1 2 0 5 8 80 11 17 45 2011 20 12 80 1 5 100 10 50 80 5 25 60 1 5 100 1 5 100 2 10 100 2012 76 14 63 1 1 100 19 25 74 7 9 43 7 9 43 12 16 67 1 1 100 5 7 40 18 24 72 2013 12 2 75 4 33 100 2 17 100 2 17 50 3 25 33
TREND TABLE B NUMBER OF BALLOT MEASURES, PERCENT OF TOTAL MEASURES, AND PERCENT PASSING BY TOPIC, JURISDICTION AND YEAR
All Measures Education Governance Land Use Public Safety Public Facilities General Services Transportation Revenue Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Number of % of All Percent Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing 1995 119 47 71 4 3 100 56 47 86 13 11 69 12 10 50 11 9 45 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 100 1996 374 65 60 2 1 100 170 45 68 42 11 62 31 8 55 22 6 55 8 2 38 4 1 25 71 19 49 1997 144 42 58 38 26 68 16 11 63 10 7 50 10 7 40 33 23 58 3 2 33 9 6 78 1998 283 49 60 101 36 62 33 12 73 27 10 56 20 7 70 10 4 100 7 2 57 62 22 47 1999 114 40 54 45 39 53 29 25 41 11 10 64 1 1 100 7 6 86 0 0 0 16 14 56 2000 297 53 60 7 2 71 119 40 64 56 19 61 18 6 61 23 8 83 12 4 50 5 2 40 2 1 0 2001 93 40 69 3 3 0 33 35 73 6 6 67 4 4 25 11 12 64 3 3 67 3 3 33 27 29 89
2002 309 47 60 1 0 0 110 36 65 37 12 38 27 9 70 24 8 54 13 4 62 5 2 40 72 23 63 2003 89 50 67 42 47 69 15 17 60 7 8 57 5 6 60 4 4 100 6 7 33 7 8 100 2004 337 47 59 2 1 100 107 32 75 44 13 64 33 10 45 24 7 29 19 6 74 4 1 75 91 27 47 2005 135 46 61 48 36 73 22 16 41 12 9 50 6 4 50 9 7 56 4 3 25 29 21 72 City Measures 2006 253 46 64 81 32 62 41 16 59 26 10 81 14 6 43 10 4 60 7 3 71 49 19 69 2007 108 60 71 49 45 78 13 12 54 5 5 100 3 3 67 5 5 80 2 2 0 31 29 68 2008 258 44 73 74 29 73 36 14 69 25 10 52 18 7 78 6 2 83 7 3 43 81 31 79 2009 130 67 61 35 27 60 14 11 50 10 8 60 4 3 75 8 6 25 1 1 0 54 42 72 2010 270 56 71 1 0 100 115 43 77 0 0 0 15 6 80 10 4 70 8 3 63 2 1 50 84 31 68 2011 107 62 75 51 48 82 8 7 75 4 4 50 4 4 100 4 4 50 1 1 0 32 30 72 2012 248 47 67 2 1 100 89 36 63 16 6 63 6 2 33 11 4 45 10 4 70 7 3 57 81 33 80 2013 90 17 68 24 10 67 12 5 42 7 3 71 4 2 50 1 0 100 39 16 79 1995 117 46 52 117 100 52 1996 85 15 62 84 99 63 1 1 0 1997 174 51 62 174 100 62 1998 164 29 62 158 96 63 5 3 40 1 1 0 1999 131 46 62 119 91 59 12 9 92 2000 146 26 63 143 98 62 2001 103 44 71 100 97 73 1 1 0 2 2 0
2002 250 38 76 249 100 76 1 0 0 2003 61 34 52 61 100 52 Measures
2004 235 33 73 233 99 73 2 1 100 2005 103 35 69 102 99 70 1 1 0
School 2006 208 37 58 208 100 58 2007 42 23 67 42 100 67 2008 245 41 80 245 100 80 2009 47 24 66 47 100 66 2010 148 31 64 148 100 64 2011 47 27 64 47 100 64 2012 206 39 82 168 82 23 2013 35 7 80 35 17 80
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────ix x ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES TREND TABLE C COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT AND COUNTY SERVICE AREA MEASURES BY COUNTY 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 % % % % % % % % % % % N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N % Passing Passing Passing Passing Passing Passing Passing Passing Passing Passing Passing Butte 2 67 100 1 100 100 Calaveras 3 100 100 1 50 0 Contra Costa 2 67 50 4 80 25 1 100 100 2 100 50 3 60 67 3 100 100 1 33 100 2 100 100 3 100 67 El Dorado 2 12 50 7 78 29 1 50 100 6 100 17 2 20 100 14 88 64 2 100 0 3 100 100 1 50 0 Fresno 1 50 100 Humboldt 1 25 100 2 100 0 1 100 0 Imperial 1 50 100 Inyo 1 50 100 Kern 6 100 50 2 100 0 4 100 75 3 100 33 1 33 100 Lake 1 100 0 1 100 100 Lassen 1 33 0 4 80 25 1 100 100 1 100 0 Los Angeles Marin 4 100 100 5 100 80 10 91 90 3 100 100 1 100 100 2 100 100 4 100 100 1 100 100 3 75 100 Mendocino 1 100 0 1 100 0 1 50 100 Monterey 1 100 0 Nevada 1 100 100 Orange 1 100 100 1 100 100 Placer 1 33 100 1 33 0 Plumas 1 100 100 2 100 100 1 50 100 Riverside 2 40 50 8 100 38 2 100 0 2 67 50 2 100 0 2 100 100 Sacramento 2 40 100 3 75 33 1 100 100 San Bernardino 2 100 50 3 100 67 1 100 0 1 100 0 1 50 0 1 33 100 1 50 100 San Diego 10 83 30 3 60 33 1 100 100 2 40 0 3 33 33 1 20 100 San Joaquin 1 100 100 San Luis Obispo 5 100 100 1 33 0 1 50 100 4 67 50 4 100 100 5 83 40 San Mateo 1 14 100 1 25 100 Santa Barbara 1 100 0 1 25 0 Santa Cruz 1 100 0 Shasta 1 100 0 Siskiyou 2 100 100 5 83 0 2 100 0 3 75 33 Sonoma 1 20 100 1 100 100 1 100 100 1 50 0 Stanislaus 1 50 0 1 25 0 Sutter 1 100 0 1 100 0 Trinity 2 100 100 Tulare 1 100 100 1 100 100 Tuolumne 1 100 0 1 33 0 1 100 100 Yolo Yuba 2 67 50 1 25 0 Total for CSD/CSA Measure Over All Counties 31 25 55 20 53 60 40 34 48 22 59 77 18 18 44 13 46 38 30 21 50 31 54 74 24 25 50 8 28 88 18 20 61
TREND TABLE C COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT AND COUNTY SERVICE AREA MEASURES BY COUNTY 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1998-2013 % % % % % % N % N % N % N % N % N % Passing Passing Passing Passing Passing Passing Butte 3 33 100 Calaveras 1 50 100 5 56 80 Contra Costa 1 50 100 2 100 100 1 100 100 25 78 72 El Dorado 1 100 0 3 75 67 1 50 0 2 100 50 45 59 49 Fresno 2 100 100 3 21 100 Humboldt 1 100 100 1 100 100 6 46 50 Imperial 1 13 100 Inyo 1 13 100 Kern 1 100 0 1 25 0 18 72 44 Lake 2 33 50 Lassen 1 100 0 8 67 25 Los Angeles 1 2 100 1 2 100 Marin 1 100 100 7 88 43 3 100 100 1 50 100 1 11 100 46 71 87 Mendocino 1 33 0 4 33 25 Monterey 1 9 0 Nevada 1 100 0 2 33 50 Orange 2 11 100 Placer 1 100 0 3 25 33 Plumas 1 100 0 5 71 80 Riverside 1 25 0 20 77 40 Sacramento 6 35 67 San Bernardino 1 100 100 1 100 100 1 9 0 13 48 54 San Diego 20 43 35 San Joaquin 2 33 100 San Luis Obispo 1 50 100 21 75 71 San Mateo 1 100 100 3 12 100 Santa Barbara 1 100 100 1 14 100 3 21 33 Santa Cruz 1 11 0 Shasta 1 100 100 2 100 0 4 100 25 Siskiyou 13 76 23 Sonoma 1 100 0 4 22 75 Stanislaus 2 25 0 Sutter 2 22 0 Trinity 2 40 100 Tulare 3 75 100 Tuolumne 1 100 100 4 40 25 Yolo 1 100 100 1 100 0 1 33 100 Yuba 3 25 33 Total for CSD/CSA Measure Over All Counties 6 38 83 15 23 40 10 50 90 14 18 50 7 58 57 308 46 58
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────xi xii ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES
TREND TABLE D NUMBER OF COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT AND COUNTY SERVICE AREA MEASURES, PERCENT OF TOTAL COUNTY MEASURES, AND PERCENT PASSING BY TYPE AND YEAR
ALL CSD/CSA TAXES BONDS ADVISORY RECALLS GANN LIMIT ORDINANCE % of % of % of % of % of % of % of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of County Pass Rate County Pass Rate County Pass Rate County Pass Rate County Pass Rate County Pass Rate County Pass Rate Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures 1998 31 25 55 22 18 45 1 1 0 8 6 88 1999 20 53 60 16 42 56 3 8 100 1 3 0 2000 40 34 48 28 24 29 1 1 100 3 3 67 6 5 100 2 2 100 2001 22 59 77 12 32 75 2 5 100 3 8 100 3 8 100 2 5 0 2002 18 18 44 14 14 36 4 4 75 2003 13 46 38 11 39 27 2 7 100 2004 30 21 50 24 17 42 1 1 100 2 1 100 3 2 67 2005 31 54 74 23 40 65 2 4 100 3 5 100 1 2 100 2 4 100 2006 24 25 50 15 16 47 4 4 25 1 1 100 4 4 75 2007 8 28 88 3 10 67 3 10 100 1 3 100 1 3 100 2008 18 20 61 11 12 45 1 1 0 4 4 100 2 2 100 2009 6 38 83 3 19 67 1 6 100 1 6 100 1 6 100 2010 15 23 40 11 17 36 4 6 50 2011 10 50 90 4 20 75 1 5 100 2 10 100 2 10 100 1 5 100 2012 14 18 50 11 14 36 1 1 100 2 3 100 2013 7 58 57 5 42 40 1 0 100 1 8 100 1998-2013 309 30 58 215 21 47 5 0 100 7 1 71 21 2 76 30 3 93 31 3 81
TREND TABLE E COMPARISON OF PASS RATES FOR COUNTY-WIDE AND COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT/ COUNTY SERVICE AREA TAX MEASURES, 1998-2013 NON-CSD/CSA COUNTY-WIDE MEASURES CSD/CSA MEASURES NON-CSD/CSA COUNTY-WIDE TAX MEASURES CSD/CSA COUNTY TAX MEASURES Total Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Percent Passing Percent Passing Percent Passing Percent Passing County Measures Measures Measures Measures Measures 1998 125 94 61 31 55 31 35 22 45 1999 38 18 67 20 60 5 20 16 56 2000 116 76 50 40 48 23 26 28 29 2001 37 15 67 22 77 2 50 12 75 2002 98 80 59 18 44 24 50 14 36 2003 28 15 87 13 38 1 0 11 27 2004 140 110 55 30 50 36 47 24 42 2005 57 26 50 31 74 1 100 23 65 2006 95 71 52 24 50 30 37 15 47 2007 29 21 71 8 88 0 0 3 67 2008 90 72 63 18 61 22 0 11 45 2009 16 10 60 6 83 1 0 3 67 2010 64 49 57 15 40 14 57 11 36 2011 20 10 70 10 90 3 67 4 75 2012 76 62 66 14 50 28 68 11 36 2013 12 5 100 7 57 0 0 5 40 1998-2013 1,041 734 59 309 58 221 44 215 47
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────xiii xiv ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES
TREND TABLE F NUMBER OF COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT AND COUNTY SERVICE AREA MEASURES, PERCENT OF TOTAL COUNTY MEASURES, AND PERCENT PASSING BY TOPIC & YEAR
ALL CSD/CSA LAND USE PUBLIC SAFETY GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC FACILITIES GENERAL SERVICES REVENUE % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of Number of County Percent Number of County Percent Number of County Percent Number of County Percent Number of County Percent Number of County Percent Number of County Percent Number of County Percent Number of County Percent Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing Measures Measures Passing
1998 31 25 55 12 10 42 3 2 67 2 2 50 1 1 0 8 6 88 4 3 25
1999 20 53 60 2 5 50 3 8 0 5 13 100 5 13 40 5 13 80
2000 40 34 48 2 2 0 10 9 30 2 2 100 6 5 17 5 4 40 5 4 60 1 1 100
2001 22 59 77 6 16 100 4 11 75 1 3 0 5 14 60 4 11 75 2 5 100
2002 18 18 44 11 11 45 3 3 67 3 3 33 1 1 0
2003 13 46 38 5 18 40 2 7 100 6 21 17
2004 30 21 50 17 12 47 1 1 0 4 3 50 4 3 50 1 1 0 2 1 100
2005 31 54 74 2 4 0 1 2 100 3 5 100 6 11 100 6 11 67 9 16 78 4 7 50
2006 24 25 50 7 7 71 7 7 43 2 2 50 3 3 0 2 2 50 3 3 67
2007 8 28 88 4 14 100 1 3 0 1 3 100 2 7 100
2008 18 20 61 8 9 50 2 2 100 2 2 50 1 1 0 5 6 80
2009 6 38 83 2 13 100 1 6 0 2 13 100 1 6 100
2010 15 23 40 7 11 43 4 6 50 1 2 0 3 5 33
2011 10 50 90 4 20 75 4 20 100 2 10 100
2012 14 18 50 1 1 100 6 8 33 2 3 100 2 3 50 3 4 33
2013 7 58 57 2 17 50 2 17 100 3 25 33
1998-2013 309 30 58 5 0 0 98 9 16 42 4 11 6 1 1 36 3 6 34 3 6 38 3 8 39 4 8
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────xv
TREND TABLE G NUMBER OF CANDIDATES BY JURISDICTION AND YEAR Number of Candidates
All County City School District Candidates Candidates Candidates Candidates 1995 2,354 0 732 1,622 1996 5,330 667 2,141 2,522 1997 2,476 23 736 1,717 1998 5,354 1,037 1,893 2,424 1999 2,274 135 724 1,415 2000 5,012 796 2,166 2,050 2001 2,505 189 688 1,628 2002 5,896 1,266 2,188 2,442 2003 2,086 205 566 1,315 2004 5,035 782 2,212 2,041 2005 2,546 167 979 1,400 2006 5,498 1,136 2,132 2,230 2007 2,021 207 811 1,003 2008 5,237 782 2,282 2,173 2009 2,066 143 863 1,060 2010 6,022 1,177 2,321 2,524 2011 1,602 138 734 730 2012 5,208 776 2332 2,100 2013 1,688 152 818 768 Total 70,210 9,778 27,318 33,164 *Runoffs are excluded from totals.
TREND TABLE H NUMBER OF CANDIDATES FOR MAJOR COUNTY OFFICES BY YEAR County Supervisor Candidates CSD/CSA Candidates Total Number Number of of County Number of % of County Number of % of County Candidates Candidates Candidates Candidates Candidates Candidates 1995 2,354 0 0 0 * * 1996 5,330 667 470 70 * * 1997 2,476 23 19 83 * * 1998 5,354 1,037 309 30 22 2 1999 2,274 135 5 4 109 81 2000 5,012 796 441 55 174 22 2001 2,505 189 0 0 186 98 2002 5,896 1,266 306 24 127 10 2003 2,086 205 10 5 175 85 2004 5,035 782 447 57 125 16 2005 2,546 167 4 2 155 93 2006 5,498 1,136 310 27 160 14 2007 2,021 207 10 5 161 78 2008 5,237 782 441 56 174 22 2009 2,066 143 0 0 141 99 2010 6,022 1,177 331 28 170 14 2011 1,602 138 6 4 103 75 2012 5,208 776 460 59 200 26 2013 1,688 152 11 7 138 91 TOTAL 70,210 9,778 3,580 37 2,320 24 *The California Elections Data Archive did not collect information on CSD/CSA candidates until 1998. **Runoffs are excluded from totals.
xvi────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES
TREND TABLE I PERCENT OF INCUMBENT CANDIDATES AND PERCENT OF PREVAILING INCUMBENTS BY MAJOR OFFICE, JURISDICTION AND YEAR
% of County Supervisor % o f City Council % of School District
% o f All Candidates Candidates Candidates Candidates 1995 27 0 18 30 1996 27 24 23 28 1997 30 5 23 33
1998 32 30 26 32 1999 30 0 23 32 2000 30 30 27 32 2001 30 0 24 32 2002 34 34 27 36 2003 31 0 22 35 who are incumbents are who
2004 33 28 28 37 2005 31 0 23 36 2006 35 29 29 36 2007 31 0 27 33 2008 34 30 30 38 2009 34 0 26 39 2010 35 28 29 39 Percent of Candidates Candidates of Percent 2011 29 0 24 34 2012 27 28 25 30 2013 30 0 27 31 1995-2013 31 28 26 34 1995 79 0 79 78 1996 79 75 74 78 1997 76 0 79 74 1998 86 87 82 83 78 0 81 77
1999 2000 79 90 80 74 2001 78 0 80 77 Who Win Who 2002 82 81 79 79 2003 78 0 72 79
2004 81 81 81 76 2005 80 0 80 78 2006 82 90 78 78 2007 77 0 79 75 2008 76 86 80 70
Percentage of Incumbents Incumbents of Percentage 2009 78 0 79 76 2010 82 83 82 79 2011 82 0 82 82 2012 74 78 74 71 2013 77 0 82 74 1995-2013 80 83 79 77 1995 50 0 41 51 1996 48 51 41 47 1997 49 0 45 50 1998 57 63 48 53
1999 51 0 45 52 2000 52 73 51 49
2001 50 0 51 50 2002 57 63 50 56 2003 51 0 40 55
2004 55 59 51 57 2005 52 0 50 52 2006 56 68 51 55 2007 50 0 54 48 who are incumbents are who 2008 56 61 55 54 2009 54 0 51 55 Percentage of Winning Candidates Winning of Percentage 2010 59 61 56 59 2011 49 0 47 51 2012 43 58 41 43 2013 47 0 52 44 1995-2013 53 61 49 52 *Runoffs are excluded from totals.
2013 ELECTION SERIES SUMMARY: ELECTION OUTCOMES FOR COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT BALLOT MEASURES AND CANDIDATES
TABLE A SUMMARY OF OUTCOMES FOR ALL COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT BALLOT MEASURES BY TYPE OF MEASURE AND COUNTY, 2013 CHARTER TAXES BONDS ADVISORY INITIATIVE RECALL GANN LIMIT ORDINANCE POLICY/POSITION ALL MEASURES AMENDMENT
PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL TOTAL ALAMEDA 1 0 1 0 1 CONTRA COSTA 3 0 2 0 5 0 5 EL DORADO 1 1 1 1 2 FRESNO 3 1 0 1 3 2 5 HUMBOLDT 1 0 1 0 1 IMPERIAL 1 0 1 0 1 KERN 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 3 4 LAKE 0 1 0 1 1 LASSEN 1 0 1 0 1 LOS ANGELES 13 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 8 8 1 0 27 14 41 MARIN 7 0 1 0 1 0 9 0 9 MENDOCINO 1 0 1 0 1 MERCED 2 0 1 0 3 0 3 MONTEREY 1 0 1 1 2 1 3 NAPA 1 0 1 0 1 ORANGE 0 1 0 1 1 RIVERSIDE 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 5 SAN BERNARDINO 1 2 1 0 4 1 2 0 8 3 11 SAN DIEGO 1 0 1 0 1 SAN FRANCISCO 1 0 3 0 4 0 4 SAN JOAQUIN 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 SAN MATEO 7 1 2 1 9 2 11 SANTA CLARA 4 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 7 2 9 SANTA CRUZ 2 1 0 2 2 3 5 SOLANO 1 0 1 0 1 SONOMA 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 STANISLAUS 0 2 1 0 1 2 3 TULARE 2 0 2 0 2 YOLO 1 0 1 0 1 All Counties 51 14 8 3 8 3 1 1 4 0 7 1 1 0 17 17 1 0 98 39 137
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 3 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ------─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 4
TABLE B SUMMARY OF OUTCOMES FOR ALL COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT BALLOT MEASURES BY TOPIC OF MEASURE AND COUNTY, 2013 GENERAL EDUCATION LAND USE SAFETY GOVERNANCE TRANSPORT SERVICES REVENUE OTHER ALL MEASURES PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL TOTAL ALAMEDA 1 0 1 0 1 CONTRA COSTA 1 0 2 0 2 0 5 0 5 EL DORADO 1 1 1 1 2 FRESNO 1 0 0 1 2 1 3 2 5 HUMBOLDT 1 0 1 0 1 IMPERIAL 1 0 1 0 1 KERN 1 2 0 1 1 3 4 Lake 0 1 0 1 1 LASSEN 1 0 1 0 1 LOS ANGELES 4 0 1 2 1 1 8 6 12 3 1 2 27 14 41 MARIN 4 0 1 0 4 0 9 0 9 MENDOCINO 1 0 1 0 1 MERCED 2 0 1 0 3 0 3 MONTEREY 1 1 1 0 2 1 3 NAPA 1 0 1 0 1 Orange 0 1 0 1 1 RIVERSIDE 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 2 3 5 SAN BERNARDINO 3 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 1 8 3 11 SAN DIEGO 1 0 1 0 1 SAN FRANCISCO 2 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 4 SAN JOAQUIN 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 SAN MATEO 5 1 4 1 9 2 11 SANTA CLARA 4 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 7 2 9 SANTA CRUZ 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 3 5 SOLANO 1 0 1 0 1 SONOMA 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 STANISLAUS 1 1 0 1 1 2 3 TULARE 2 0 2 0 2 YOLO 1 0 1 0 1 All Counties 28 7 7 7 6 3 20 8 2 2 2 2 31 8 2 2 98 39 137
TABLE C SUMMARY OF ELECTION OUTCOMES FOR ALL COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICES, 2013 County Other County Other City School Director, CSD* City Council Total Supervisor Offices Offices Board Member Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Win 0 0 64.7 33 100.0 1 81.7 138 83.3 35 74.4 177 76.6 384 Incumbent Lose 0 0 35.3 18 0.0 0 18.3 31 16.7 7 25.6 61 23.4 117 Candidates Total 0 0 100.0 51 100.0 1 100.0 169 100.0 42 100.0 238 100.0 501 Win 33.3 3 54.0 47 100.0 1 27.5 128 26.7 28 42.9 223 36.2 430 Non- Incumbent Lose 66.7 6 46.0 40 0.0 0 72.5 337 73.3 77 57.1 297 63.8 757 Candidates Total 100.0 9 100.0 87 100.0 1 100.0 465 100.0 105 100.0 520 100.0 1,187 Incumbent 0.0 0 41.3 33 50.0 1 51.9 138 55.6 35 44.3 177 47.2 384 Winning Non-Incumbent 100.0 3 58.8 47 50.0 1 48.1 128 44.4 28 55.8 223 52.8 430 Candidates Total 100.0 3 100.0 80 100.0 2 100.0 266 100.0 63 100.0 400 100.0 814 Incumbent 0.0 0 31.0 18 0 0 8.4 31 8.3 7 17.0 61 13.4 117 Losing Non-Incumbent 100.0 6 69.0 40 0 0 91.6 337 91.7 77 83.0 297 86.6 757 Candidates Total 100.0 6 100.0 58 0 0 100.0 368 100.0 84 100.0 358 100.0 874 Incumbent 0.0 0 37.0 51 50.0 1 26.7 169 28.6 42 31.4 238 29.7 501 All Non-Incumbent 100.0 9 63.0 87 50.0 1 73.3 465 71.4 105 68.6 520 70.3 1,187 Candidates Total 100.0 9 100.0 138 100.0 2 100.0 634 100.0 147 100.0 758 100.0 1,688 *Directors of Community Service Districts, and Community Service Areas **Runoffs are excluded from totals.
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 5
PART 1 VOTE TOTALS, ELECTION OUTCOMES AND TEXT FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES
TABLE 1.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES BY COUNTY, 2013 VOTE IN TOTAL PERCENT PASS COUNTY DATE CITY MEASURE TITLE TYPE OF MEASURE TOPIC OF MEASURE FAVOR VOTE OF VOTE OR FAIL ALAMEDA No City Measures
ALPINE No City Measures
AMADOR No City Measures
BUTTE No City Measures
CALAVERAS No City Measures
COLUSA No City Measures
CONTRA COSTA 6/4/2013 Hercules Measure A Utility Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 2,248 3,168 71.0% Pass 11/5/2013 Antioch Measure C Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 7,609 11,175 68.1% Pass
San Ramon Measure D Ordinance Governance: Elections 6,737 8,108 83.1% Pass
Measure E Ordinance Governance: Elections 6,578 8,086 81.4% Pass
DEL NORTE No City Measures
EL DORADO No City Measures
FRESNO 6/4/2013 Fresno Measure G Ordinance General Services: Solid Waste 29,039 58,940 49.3% Fail 7/23/2013 Firebaugh Measure A Utility Tax Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit 431 570 75.6% Pass
Measure B Utility Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 235 577 40.7% Fail
11/5/2013 Huron Measure P Sales Tax Safety: Police 109 156 69.9% PassT
Selma Measure K Transient Occupancy Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 595 1,186 50.2% Pass
GLENN No City Measures
HUMBOLDT No City Measures
IMPERIAL No City Measures
INYO No City Measures
KERN No City Measures
KINGS No City Measures
LAKE 11/5/2013 Clearlake Measure H Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 1,127 1,864 60.5% FailT LASSEN No City Measures
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Carson Measure M Ordinance Governance: Organization 1,851 11,073 16.7% Fail La Habra Heights Measure A Ordinance Revenues: Voter Approval Requirement 748 1,267 59.0% Pass
Measure B Miscellaneous Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 644 1,267 50.8% Pass
Los Angeles Measure A Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 153,000 337,559 45.3% Fail
Measure B Charter Amendment Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations 186,937 321,962 58.1% Pass
TIndicates measure required 2/3’s vote to pass. FIndicates measure required 55% of the vote to pass. All other city measures required a majority vote.
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 9
CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 10
TABLE 1.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES BY COUNTY, 2013 VOTE IN TOTAL PERCENT PASS COUNTY DATE CITY MEASURE TITLE TYPE OF MEASURE TOPIC OF MEASURE FAVOR VOTE OF VOTE OR FAIL LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Monterey Park Measure DD Ordinance Other 2,551 4,244 60.1% Pass (continued) Measure EE Ordinance Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits 3,589 4,451 80.6% Pass
Redondo Beach Measure A Ordinance Land Use: Zoning 6,295 12,847 49.0% Fail
Rolling Hills Measure A Ordinance Land Use: Zoning 359 809 44.4% Fail
Measure B Ordinance Land Use 408 811 50.3% Pass
San Dimas Measure A Transient Occupancy Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 1,508 2,700 55.9% Pass
San Gabriel Measure SG Transient Occupancy Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 2,143 2,774 77.3% Pass
West Hollywood Measure C Ordinance Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits 3,139 5,027 62.4% Pass
4/2/2013 Glendale Measure A Charter Amendment Governance: Organization 4,726 18,538 25.5% Fail
Measure B Charter Amendment Governance: Budget Processes 8,767 17,721 49.5% Fail
Glendale Measure C Charter Amendment Governance: Organization 7,613 17,546 43.4% Fail
Inglewood Measure P Charter Amendment Governance 3,974 5,547 71.6% Pass
Measure W Charter Amendment Governance 3,154 5,523 57.1% Pass
4/9/2013 Burbank Measure S Utility Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 3,806 8,736 43.6% FailT
Vernon Measure K Business Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 37 42 88.1% Pass
Measure L Property Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 36 42 85.7% PassT
Measure M Utility Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 34 41 82.9% Pass
4/16/2013 Compton Measure I Ordinance Safety: Police 3,779 6,207 60.9% Pass
5/5/2013 Bradbury Measure BB Utility Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 163 273 59.7% Pass Measure 5/21/2013 Los Angeles C Policy/Position Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits 285,770 372,807 76.7% Pass Measure D Business Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 234,793 376,033 62.4% Pass Measure E Ordinance Other 117,421 342,648 34.3% Fail Measure F Business Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 144,268 350,283 41.2% Fail
6/4/2013 San Fernando Measure A Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 567 936 60.6% Pass
7/2/2013 Monterey Park Measure FF Ordinance Safety: Fire 2,290 6,392 35.8% Fail
11/5/2013 El Monte Measure EM Ordinance Governance: Organization 1,921 4,586 41.9% Fail
Measure GG Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 3,331 4,697 70.9% Pass
Measure RM Ordinance Governance: Organization 1,798 4,484 40.1% Fail
Hawthorne Measure A Ordinance Governance: Organization 2,088 4,119 50.7% Pass
Hermosa Beach Measure B Ordinance Other 1,318 4,841 27.2% Fail
Santa Fe Springs Measure S Business Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 1,309 1,815 72.1% Pass
MADERA No City Measures
TABLE 1.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES BY COUNTY, 2013 VOTE IN TOTAL PERCENT PASS COUNTY DATE CITY MEASURE TITLE TYPE OF MEASURE TOPIC OF MEASURE FAVOR VOTE OF VOTE OR FAIL MARIN 11/5/2013 Corte Madera Measure B Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 1,785 2,622 68.1% Pass Larkspur Measure C Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 2,771 3,655 75.8% Pass
San Anselmo Measure D Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 2,376 3,398 69.9% Pass
San Rafael Measure E Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 7,760 11,883 65.3% Pass
MARIPOSA No City Measures
MENDOCINO 8/27/2013 Fort Bragg Measure H Sales Tax Transport: Roads 757 1,079 70.2% PassT MERCED 3/5/2013 Atwater Measure H Sales Tax Safety: Multiple Emergency Services 1,822 2,717 67.1% PassT 11/5/2013 Los Banos Measure K Sales Tax Safety: Multiple Emergency Services 2,357 2,732 86.3% PassT
Merced Measure J Charter Amendment Governance: Elections 6,339 7,037 90.1% Pass
MODOC No City Measures
MONO No City Measures
MONTEREY 11/5/2013 Marina Measure I Business Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 2,185 2,964 73.7% Pass NAPA 3/5/2013 Calistoga Measure C Ordinance Land Use: Zoning 781 1,424 54.8% Pass NEVADA No City Measures
ORANGE 6/25/2013 Cypress Measure A Ordinance Land Use: Zoning 2,047 6,872 29.8% Fail PLACER No City Measures
PLUMAS No City Measures
RIVERSIDE 6/4/2013 Riverside Measure A Charter Amendment Governance: Budget Processes 16,844 24,839 67.8% Pass 11/5/2013 Blythe Measure C Ordinance Governance: Organization 350 1,198 29.2% Fail
Canyon Lake Measure E Advisory Land Use: Zoning 610 2,524 24.2% Fail
Measure D Miscellaneous Tax Safety: Fire 1,277 2,531 50.5% FailT
Palm Springs Measure B Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 5,585 8,427 66.3% Pass
SACRAMENTO No City Measures
SAN BENITO No City Measures
SAN BERNARDINO 3/5/2013 Rialto Measure W Utility Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 3,050 4,853 62.8% Pass 11/5/2013 Chino Measure B Ordinance Land Use: Zoning 1,885 2,702 69.8% Pass
Grand Terrace Measure C Utility Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 932 2,364 39.4% Fail
San Bernardino Recall 1 Recall Governance: Recall 1,460 2,493 58.6% Pass
Recall 2 Recall Governance: Recall 7,730 12,743 60.7% Pass
Recall 3 Recall Governance: Recall 426 1,131 37.7% Fail
11/19/2013 Apple Valley Measure D Ordinance Land Use: Zoning 6,230 10,633 58.6% Pass
SAN DIEGO 6/18/2013 Encinitas Measure A Initiative Land Use: Voter Approval 6,675 12,873 51.9% Pass
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 11
CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 12
TABLE 1.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES BY COUNTY, 2013 VOTE IN TOTAL PERCENT PASS COUNTY DATE CITY MEASURE TITLE TYPE OF MEASURE TOPIC OF MEASURE FAVOR VOTE OF VOTE OR FAIL SAN FRANCISCO County and City Measures included in the County report
SAN JOAQUIN 11/5/2013 Stockton Measure A Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 14,939 28,808 51.9% Pass Measure B Ordinance Governance 16,776 28,306 59.3% Pass
SAN LUIS OBISPO No City Measures
SAN MATEO 11/5/2013 Atherton Measure X Property Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 1,466 1,998 73.4% PassT Brisbane Measure T Business Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 881 1,143 77.1% Pass
Foster City Measure U Business Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 3,077 4,203 73.2% Pass
Pacifica Measure V Utility Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 2,575 7,545 34.1% Fail
Portola Valley Measure Q Utility Tax Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit 1,035 1,200 86.3% Pass
SANTA BARBARA No City Measures
SANTA CLARA 11/5/2013 Palo Alto Measure D Ordinance Land Use: Zoning 6,538 15,014 43.5% Fail Sunnyvale Measure A Charter Amendment Governance: Elections 13,259 18,401 72.1% Pass
Measure B Transient Occupancy Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 12,657 18,456 68.6% Pass
Measure C Ordinance Safety: Firearms 12,404 18,639 66.5% Pass
SANTA CRUZ 6/4/2013 Watsonville Measure T Ordinance Land Use: Zoning 1,064 4,409 24.1% Fail 11/5/2013 Scotts Valley Measure U Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 2,029 2,696 75.3% Pass
SHASTA No City Measures
SIERRA No City Measures
SISKIYOU No City Measures
SOLANO 11/5/2013 Vallejo Measure E Charter Amendment Governance: Elections 10,520 13,671 77.0% Pass SONOMA 11/5/2013 Rohnert Park Measure A Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 4,187 6,220 67.3% PassT 11/19/2013 Sonoma Measure B Ordinance Land Use: Growth Cap/Boundary 1,908 3,940 48.4% Fail
STANISLAUS 11/5/2013 Modesto Measure V Ordinance General Services: Wastewater/Sewage 15,718 22,973 68.4% Pass Measure X Sales Tax Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin. 11,815 24,137 48.9% Fail
Waterford Measure W Miscellaneous Tax General Services: Maintenance 275 943 29.2% FailT
SUTTER No City Measures
TEHAMA No City Measures
TRINITY No City Measures
TULARE No City Measures
TOULUMNE No City Measures
VENTURA No City Measures
YOLO 3/5/2013 Davis Measure I Ordinance General Services: Water 8,014 14,816 54.1% Pass YUBA No City Measures
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES ────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 13
TABLE 1.2 TEXT FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES BY COUNTY, 2013
CONTRA COSTA 6/4/2013 Hercules Measure A Pass To restore Hercules to financial stability, enhance fiscal accountability, continue to maintain our own local Police Department, and prevent drastic cuts to neighborhood police officers, youth/senior programs, and other services, shall Hercules modernize its utility users tax with equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology, increase the rate by 2% for 5 years, maintain current low-income exemptions, with citizens’ oversight, independent audits, and local control of revenues?
CONTRA COSTA 11/5/2013 Antioch Measure C Pass To fund all essential city services including increased police staffing to reduce crime and gang activities and improve 911 emergency response time; restored code enforcement to clean up blighted properties; and local economic development and job creation, shall the City of Antioch adopt a one-half cent transactions and use (sales) tax, expiring in seven years, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizens’ oversight and for local Antioch use only?
CONTRA COSTA 11/5/2013 San Ramon Measure D Pass Shall an ordinance be adopted by the people to amend the City Municipal Code to change the general municipal election date from November of odd- numbered years to November of even-numbered years and to extend the terms of the Mayor and all City Council members by one year to make that change? (Saves approximately $142,000 per election.)
CONTRA COSTA 11/5/2013 San Ramon Measure E Pass Shall Article III of the City of San Ramon Charter be amended to: a) change the mayoral election date from odd-numbered years to the date of the statewide general election during even-numbered years; and b) extend by one year the term of the Mayor elected in 2013 to accommodate the election date change; and c) extend the cumulative total number of years the mayor elected in 2013 may serve from eight to nine years? (Saves approximately $142,000 per election.)
FRESNO 6/4/2013 Fresno Measure G Fail Shall Ordinance 2012-26 which grants to Mid Valley Disposal an exclusive franchise for the collection of residential solid waste, recyclable materials, and organic materials within the City of Fresno be adopted?
FRESNO 7/23/2013 Firebaugh Measure A Pass Shall Ordinance 13-01 be adopted to lower the commercial rate for utility users tax from 10% to 7.5% immediately, lower the residential rate to 7.5% effective July 1, 2019, allow the City Council the ability to further lower the commercial rate on or after July 1, 2019 upon making certain findings, and to remove the cap on City utility users taxes?
FRESNO 7/23/2013 Firebaugh Measure B Fail Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City's Utility Users Tax in order to impose a 5% utility users tax on new telecommunication technologies such as wireless and voice over internet services?
FRESNO 11/5/2013 Huron Measure P Pass (2/3 required) To hire additional police officers for crime suppression and prevention, increased police patrols to protect neighborhoods, schools and parks and to purchase necessary related equipment or facilities to expand police protection services, shall the City of Huron enact a One Cent ($0.01) sales taxes requiring that revenues receive from such sales tax be used exclusively for public safety purposes?
FRESNO 11/5/2013 Selma Measure K Pass Shall the City of Selma increase the existing transient occupancy tax for the privilege of occupancy in any room, hotel, inn, motel or other lodging, for occupancy? for a period of less than 30 days, from 6% to 12% of the rent charged by the operator of such lodging?
LAKE 11/5/2013 Clearlake Measure H Fail (2/3 required) Shall the City of Clearlake impose a retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one percent (1%) within the City to be used for repair of City streets and roads and other transportation services and code enforcement, and shall the appropriations limit for the City of Clearlake for roadway repair and maintenance and code enforcement be increased for Fiscal Year 2013-2014 by the amount of the tax proceeds received by the City during that period.
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Carson Measure M Fail Shall the City of Carson eliminate the direct election of a mayor and return to selection of a mayor by the city council, on a rotating basis, with the mayor to be compensated the same as all other members of the City Council, the same to be effective commencing in 2017?
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 La Habra Heights Measure A Pass Shall an ordinance be adopted to renew the City's authority to spend existing revenues from the special fire tax, approved by two-thirds of the City's voters in 1997, to provide essential fire and life-safety services, by renewing the voter-approved amendment to the City's appropriation limit?
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 La Habra Heights Measure B Pass In order to fund general municipal services, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the existing tax on resource extraction activities in the City of La Habra Heights and provide for future annual adjustments to reflect changes in the natural resource market?
PAGE 14───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES
TABLE 1.2 TEXT FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES BY COUNTY, 2013
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Los Angeles Measure A Fail (INITIATIVE) To offset severe and repeated State cuts and provide funding for: 911 emergency response services; maintaining firefighter, paramedic, and police officer staffing levels; continuing community policing, senior services, after-school gang and drug prevention programs; repairing potholes and sidewalks; and other general municipal services; shall the City of Los Angeles enact a one-half cent transactions and use (generally referred to as sales) tax, with required independent audits, public review of expenditures, and all funds used locally?
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Los Angeles Measure B Pass Shall the Charter be amended to authorize the City Council to allow sworn police personnel who are transferred from the Department of General Services to the Police Department to purchase, at their own expense, retirement credit for prior sworn City service after they become members of the Fire and Police Pension Plan?
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Monterey Park Measure DD Pass Shall the ordinance that does not increase the City's telephone utility user tax rate but rather amends the City's telephone utility tax code to reflect changes in electronic communication equipment, methods and regulations be adopted?
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Monterey Park Measure EE Pass Shall the ordinance implementing term limits for the City Council, City Treasurer, and City Clerk be adopted?
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Redondo Beach Measure A Fail Shall Redondo Beach Phase Out Existing Power Generation and Power Transmission from an Approximately 50-Acre Site and Set New Land Use and Development Standards by Amending the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, Harbor/Civic Center Specific Plan, Coastal Zoning, Zoning, and City Charter; the new land use would be allocated between 60-70% to parks and open space and the remaining 30-40% allocated between commercial, institutional or marine related light industrial/boatyard uses?
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Rolling Hills Measure A Fail Shall an Ordinance be adopted amending the zoning ordinance to allow stables constructed prior to July 12, 2010 to be used for residential purposes?
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Rolling Hills Measure B Pass Shall an Ordinance be adopted amending the current view preservation regulations by limiting protection only to views that existed at the time the owner acquired the property, exempting trees that were mature when the property was acquired, and establishing a higher burden of proof to show the existence of a protected view?
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 San Dimas Measure A Pass To provide funding for general city services, including public safety (Sheriff), parks and recreation, and maintenance of city streets and public area landscaping, shall the City of San Dimas approve an ordinance amending the San Dimas Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate from eight (8%) to twelve (12%) on the rate charged to hotel and recreational vehicle campground guests staying within the City to be effective July 1, 2013?
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 San Gabriel Measure SG Pass To provide funding for general city services, including public safety, repairing, paving and maintaining local streets, keeping public areas and landscape clean and well maintained, and preserving fire and paramedic emergency response times, shall the City of San Gabriel approve an ordinance amending the San Gabriel Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate charged to hotel guests staying within the City from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%), to be effective April 1, 2013?
LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 West Hollywood Measure C Pass Shall an ordinance be adopted limiting the number of terms a person may serve on the West Hollywood City Council to no more than three terms, including partial terms, whether or not consecutive, commencing with terms served by persons elected at or after the March 2013 election?
LOS ANGELES 4/2/2013 Glendale Measure A Fail Shall the Charter be amended to convert the position of City Treasurer from elected to an appointed position; the appointment be made by the City Manager; be at-will; that the City Manager may assign certain duties to other deputies or the Director of Finance; that the minimum qualifications shall be in the Charter by reference to the Government Code; that the bond and oath of the City Clerk be filed with the City Attorney?
LOS ANGELES 4/2/2013 Glendale Measure B Fail Shall the Charter be amended to update accounting provisions to eliminate obsolete funds and to reflect generally accepted accounting principles, to ensure proper accounting by establishing separate water and electric utility funds, and to clarify existing language regarding fund transfers?
LOS ANGELES 4/2/2013 Glendale Measure C Fail Shall the Charter be amended to reflect the correct title of the Director of Finance, remove obsolete language regarding petty cash handling, require that the budget be adopted by June 30, and eliminate inefficiencies in bond sales by allowing flexibility?
LOS ANGELES 4/2/2013 Inglewood Measure P Pass Shall the Charter be amended to allow for the publication of a summary of an ordinance?
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES ────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 15
TABLE 1.2 TEXT FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES BY COUNTY, 2013
LOS ANGELES 4/2/2013 Inglewood Measure W Pass Shall the Charter be amended to allow for the waiving of a full reading of an ordinance when a majority of the Councilmembers present agree to the waiver?
LOS ANGELES 4/9/2013 Burbank Measure S Fail (2/3 required) Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City of Burbank establishing a special tax not exceeding 2% on fees and charges for sewer and refuse collection services to be used exclusively to support the City's Sewer Fund and Refuse Assistance Programs that reduce rates for eligible low-income customers, including seniors over 62 years of age, persons with a permanent disability, persons requiring life support, or households with a disabled person or person requiring life support?
LOS ANGELES 4/9/2013 Vernon Measure K Pass Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the rates of the City's existing business license taxes and to modify the method for calculating such taxes?
LOS ANGELES 4/9/2013 Vernon Measure L Pass (2/3 required) Shall an ordinance be adopted to authorize, for a period of ten years, the levy of an annual special parcel tax on non-residential parcels at the rate of $0.03 per square foot (adjusted annually for inflation) to fund (i) City fire protection services and projects, (ii) City health services and projects, and (iii) City police services and projects?
LOS ANGELES 4/9/2013 Vernon Measure M Pass Shall an ordinance be adopted to authorize, for a period of ten years, the levy of a 1% utility users' tax on electricity, gas, telecommunications, video and water utility services, with exemptions for residential services provided to persons with disabilities and low income households?
LOS ANGELES 4/16/2013 Compton Measure I Pass Shall the "Police Powers" that can be provided in the City of Compton by a municipal Police Department be provided by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department?
LOS ANGELES 5/5/2013 Bradbury Measure BB Pass In order to preserve Bradbury’s essential city services, maintain a safe and quality community and meet the obligations of State and Federal Mandates, shall an ordinance be adopted to establish a Utility Users Tax on gas, electric, cable, trash, and telecommunications services at a rate not to exceed 7.5% (5.5% the first year) and 3.75% on water (2.75% the first year) for a period of 5 years, with exemptions for solar and certain low income households.
LOS ANGELES 5/21/2013 Los Angeles Measure C Pass (INITIATIVE) Shall the voters adopt a resolution that there should be limits on political campaign spending and that corporations should not have the constitutional rights of human beings and instruct Los Angeles elected officials and area legislative representatives to promote that policy through amendments to the United States Constitution?
LOS ANGELES 5/21/2013 Los Angeles Measure D Pass (INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance regulating businesses where marijuana is cultivated, processed, distributed, delivered or given away to qualified patients or primary caregivers (MMBs) by: (1) prohibiting MMBs but providing limited immunity for MMBs that operated since September 2007, timely registered with the City, generally have not ceased operations, pay City taxes, pass annual background checks, are separated from residential zones, maintain certain distances from schools, parks, child care facilities, other designated places and other MMBs, and meet other requirements and operational standards; (2) exempting dwelling units used by three or fewer patients/caregivers to cultivate medical marijuana on-site for their patients or themselves, and other exemptions; and (3) increasing the MMB tax to $60 per each $1,000 of gross receipts; be adopted?
LOS ANGELES 5/21/2013 Los Angeles Measure E Fail (INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance regulating associations of six or more qualified patients and/or primary caregivers who gather to cultivate, distribute or engage in other activities related to marijuana for medical purposes (MMCs) by: (1) prohibiting MMCs but providing limited immunity for MMCs that operated since September 2007, timely registered with the City, generally have not ceased operations for 90 days, pass annual background checks, are separated from residential zones, maintain certain distances from schools, parks, child care facilities and other designated places, and satisfy other requirements; (2) establishing operational standards enforceable as infractions; and (3) exempting associations of five or fewer patients/caregivers who process or cultivate medical marijuana on-site for MMCs, their patients or themselves, and other exemptions; be adopted?
LOS ANGELES 5/21/2013 Los Angeles Measure F Fail (INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance regulating associations of qualified patients and/or primary caregivers who cultivate, provide or engage in other activities related to marijuana for medical purposes (MMCs) by: (1) prohibiting MMCs but providing limited immunity for MMCs that register with the City (without limiting the number that can register but giving registration priority to those possessing City tax certificates by October 2012), generally have not ceased operations for more than 90 days, pass annual background checks, are separated from residential uses, maintain certain distances from schools, parks, child care facilities, other designated places and other MMCs, and meet other requirements and operational standards; (2) exempting dwellings zoned residential, and other exemptions; and (3) increasing the MMC tax to $60 per each $1,000 of gross receipts; be adopted?
LOS ANGELES 6/4/2013 San Fernando Measure A Pass To stabilize the City financially and offset severe cuts in federal and state funding as well as sharp reductions in general fund revenues which threaten the City’s ability to adequately provide general municipal services, including but not limited to police and fire service; and street, sidewalk, park and other vital infrastructure maintenance, shall an ordinance imposing a temporary, seven-year half percent (1/2%) transactions and use (sales) tax be approved?
PAGE 16───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES
TABLE 1.2 TEXT FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES BY COUNTY, 2013
LOS ANGELES 7/2/2013 Monterey Park Measure FF Fail Shall an ordinance amending the Monterey Park Municipal Code to authorize and direct the City Council to negotiate to transfer all functions of the Monterey Park Fire Department to the consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (aka the Los Angeles County Fire Department) be adopted?
LOS ANGELES 11/5/2013 El Monte Measure EM Fail Shall the term of office for the elected office of Mayor be extended from two (2) years to four (4) years, commencing with the 2015 General Municipal Election cycle?
LOS ANGELES 11/5/2013 El Monte Measure GG Pass To preserve and stabilize funding for essential public services such as keeping the City’s four fire stations open; maintaining staffing levels for emergency response police services; street lighting and repair; senior services; and youth parks programs and to build the City’s “rainy day" general fund reserves, shall the City’s existing one half of one percent (1/2%) transactions and use tax be extended for five years?
LOS ANGELES 11/5/2013 El Monte Measure RM Fail Shall the City Council be reorganized to replace the current structure of one elected Mayor serving a two-year term and four elected Council Members serving staggered four-year terms with a structure composed of five elected City Council Members who will share the title of Mayor on a rotating basis subject to voter approved procedures for accomplishing the rotation?
LOS ANGELES 11/5/2013 Hawthorne Measure A Pass Shall the directly elected mayor for the City of Hawthorne serve a four-year term of office rather than a two-year term of office, so that all members of the City Council of the City of Hawthorne serve four-year terms of office, effective for the 2015 election?
LOS ANGELES 11/5/2013 Hermosa Beach Measure B Fail Shall an ordinance be adopted to incrementally, over a five-year period, reduce the postmidnight operating hours of specified businesses in the downtown area of Hermosa Beach?
LOS ANGELES 11/5/2013 Santa Fe Springs Measure S Pass Shall Ordinance No. 1044, which would increase the oil barrel tax charged to operators of oil wells in the City from $.20 per barrel to an amount ranging from a minimum of $.41 to a maximum of $.52 per barrel, be adopted?
MARIN 11/5/2013 Corte Madera Measure B Pass To maintain essential Town services including but not limited to: current levels of local fire prevention, flood control, streets and potholes, disaster preparedness, safe routes to schools, and senior and youth programs, shall the Town enact a half-cent sales tax for 6 years, requiring a citizen’s oversight committee review and annual examination to ensure funds are spent locally as promised for the benefit of Corte Madera residents?
MARIN 11/5/2013 Larkspur Measure C Pass To repair aging and deteriorating neighborhood streets and roads; repair potholes; maintain police and fire protection; maintain 9-1-1 emergency/medical response; clear hazardous and flammable brush to prevent fires and improve emergency vehicle access; and maintain essential city services, shall the City of Larkspur enact a ½ cent sales tax for 5 years with annual performance reviews, independent annual audits, citizens oversight, and no money for Sacramento?
MARIN 11/5/2013 San Anselmo Measure D Pass To repair potholes, repave roads, reduce traffic congestion, maintain and improve sidewalks/drainage/street medians, preserve public safety, and improve other general Town services, facilities, and infrastructure, shall the Town of San Anselmo establish a one-half percent (.5%) sales tax for ten years, with annual independent audits, mandatory public expenditure reports, and an independent citizens’ oversight committee with all funds staying in San Anselmo under local control?
MARIN 11/5/2013 San Rafael Measure E Pass Shall the City of San Rafael extend the existing one-half percent local sales tax and increase the rate by one-quarter percent to provide funding that cannot be taken by the State, and can be used to preserve essential city services for a period of 20 years, including: maintaining rapid emergency police/fire response times, maintaining adequate numbers of on-duty firefighters/paramedics/police, ensuring earthquake safe police/fire stations, maintaining community centers and repairing city streets?
MENDOCINO 8/27/2013 Fort Bragg Measure H Pass (2/3 required) Shall the local Fort Bragg special purpose transactions and use tax (sales tax) of one-half of one percent for the express purpose of repairing, maintaining, and reconstructing existing streets, which expires December 31, 2014, be extended until December 31, 2024 to allow for continued maintenance of streets and alleys in Fort Bragg?
MERCED 3/5/2013 Atwater Measure H Pass (2/3 required) To preserve the City's long-term financial stability and maintain public safety services, including police patrols and fire protection; 911 emergency response; rapid response to gang violence, robberies and burglaries; park safety; youth, shall the City of Atwater enact a one-half cent sales tax, for the term of up to ten (10) years, with all funds to be spent locally, requiring independent Citizen's Oversight and published annual audits?
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES ────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 17
TABLE 1.2 TEXT FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES BY COUNTY, 2013
MERCED 11/5/2013 Los Banos Measure K Pass (2/3 required) To maintain the number of local police officers/firefighters/E-M-Ts, anti-gang/crime units, and 9-1-1 emergency response times shall Los Banos voters extend Measure A for no more than 7 years to address local public safety needs and protect/maintain police officer and firefighter positions, with citizens oversight, independent annual audits, keeping all funds exclusively for Los Banos without raising taxes?
MERCED 11/5/2013 Merced Measure J Pass Shall Section 400 of the City Charter be amended to reduce election costs to the City by consolidating the Mayor and City Council elections with statewide elections in even numbered years resulting in the next City election being in 2016 rather than 2015 and making a one-time adjustment in Mayor and City Council terms and term-limits to accomplish the change?
MONTEREY 11/5/2013 Marina Measure I Pass Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring each cardroom within the City to pay the City a tax of 5% of annual gross gaming revenues commencing January 1, 2014, to fund general municipal services such as public safety, street maintenance and neighborhood improvements
NAPA 3/5/2013 Calistoga Measure C Pass Shall Resolution 2012-062, a general plan amendment approved by the City Council to establish a planned development overlay and certain planned development goals for the property generally located at 515 Foothill Boulevard, Calistoga, which will allow the development of the Enchanted Resorts resort and residential project, be adopted?
ORANGE 6/25/2013 Cypress Measure A Fail Shall the ordinance approving amendments to the Amended and Restated Cypress Business & Professional Center Specific Plan, together with related General Plan amendments and a zone change, to allow additional uses, including single-family housing and neighborhood commercial uses, in one planning area adjacent to Cerritos Avenue, and additional uses, including mixed-use commercial and business park uses, in a second planning area southeast of the Los Alamitos Race Course between Katella and Cerritos Avenues, be adopted?
RIVERSIDE 6/4/2013 Riverside Measure A Pass To maintain general fund services such as 9-1-1 response; police patrols/fire protection; children’s after-school and senior/disabled services; and protect supplies of clean drinking water from contamination; shall Section 1204.1 be added to the Charter continuing the annual transfer of funds from the City water utility to the general fund approved by City voters in 1968, with independent audits, funds staying local and no increase in taxes?
RIVERSIDE 11/5/2013 Blythe Measure C Fail Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointed?
RIVERSIDE 11/5/2013 Canyon Lake Measure E Fail (ADVISORY) Should the area of Canyon Lake commonly known as Goetz Hill be graded for retail development?
RIVERSIDE 11/5/2013 Canyon Lake Measure D Fail (2/3 required) Shall Ordinance No. 148 enacting a special tax to fund the continuation of Fire Station 60 and to fund fire protection services in the City of Canyon Lake be adopted?
RIVERSIDE 11/5/2013 Palm Springs Measure B Pass In order to help fund general municipal services, including but not limited to such matters as police protection and crime suppression services, fire prevention and suppression services, emergency medical services, park, recreation, and library facilities and services, and general improvements throughout the City, shall an ordinance to impose a tax at a rate of up to 15 cents per $1.00 of proceeds on cannabis or marijuana collectives operating in the City of Palm Springs be adopted?
SAN BERNARDINO 3/5/2013 Rialto Measure W Pass Shall the Ordinance to Continue the Utility User Tax for five years be Adopted?
SAN BERNARDINO 11/5/2013 Chino Measure B Pass Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of 6.48 acres of vacant land from General Commercial to Residential RD8 and of 5.31 acres of vacant land from Office Commercial to Residential RD8, generally located at the southeast corner of Riverside Drive and Fern Avenue, for a maximum of 94 single-family dwelling units?
SAN BERNARDINO 11/5/2013 Grand Terrace Measure C Fail To ensure Grand Terrace has the funds necessary to remain an independent city and able to provide essential services to residents including rapid response to 9-1-1 police emergencies, maintenance/repair of local streets, adequate police services, and maintaining parks and public facilities, shall t h e City of Grand Terrace establish a utility users’ tax of 5% for six years only with independent citizen oversight, all money staying local, and an exemption for low-income seniors?
SAN BERNARDINO 11/5/2013 San Bernardino Recall 1 Pass Shall City Council Member Wendy J. McCammack be recalled?
PAGE 18───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES
TABLE 1.2 TEXT FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES BY COUNTY, 2013
SAN BERNARDINO 11/5/2013 San Bernardino Recall 2 Pass Shall City Attorney James F. Penman be recalled?
SAN BERNARDINO 11/5/2013 San Bernardino Recall 3 Fail Shall City Council Member John Valdivia be recalled?
SAN BERNARDINO 11/19/2013 Apple Valley Measure D Pass Shall a General Plan Amendment be adopted, and shall Chapter 9.40 be repealed and Chapter 9.41 be added to the Town Development Code to enact the “Dale Evans Parkway Commercial Specific Plan” in order to allow a proposed commercial development in the Town of Apple Valley located on approximately 30 acres of undeveloped property north of Happy Trails Highway (SR-18), at the southeasterly corner of the intersection of Dale Evans Parkway and Thunderbird Road?
SAN DIEGO 6/18/2013 Encinitas Measure A Pass (INITIATIVE) Shall the people of Encinitas adopt an initiative measure, known as "The Encinitas Right to Vote Amendment" to require voter approval, by a majority vote of the electorate, for a major amendment to a planning policy document (defined to mean the Land Use Element of the General Plan, Land Use Policy Maps of the General Plan, Zoning Code, Zoning Map, any specific plan, and development agreements) and to impose a citywide height limit?
SAN JOAQUIN 11/5/2013 Stockton Measure A Pass To pay for law enforcement and crime prevention services such as those described in Stockton’s Marshall Plan on Crime, to help end the bankruptcy and restore other City services; and provided it shall sunset in ten years or when economic recovery occurs, a Citizen’s Oversight Committee reports on the use of proceeds, and independent audits are done annually; shall Ordinance 2013-07-09-1601 be adopted to impose a 3/4-cent transaction and use (sales) tax?
SAN JOAQUIN 11/5/2013 Stockton Measure B Pass If Measure A is approved by the voters, shall (i) 65% of its proceeds be used only to pay for law enforcement and crime prevention services in the City such as those described in the City’s Marshall Plan on Crime and (ii) 35% of its proceeds be used only to pay for the City’s efforts to end the bankruptcy and for services to residents, businesses, and property owners?
SAN MATEO 11/5/2013 Atherton Measure X Pass (2/3 required) To continue providing funding to maintain neighborhood police patrols and the Town's ability to respond to emergencies, repairing and maintaining streets, and repairing and constructing storm drains, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue a Special Parcel Tax for four years and allowing for the expenditure of funds derived from such tax?
SAN MATEO 11/5/2013 Brisbane Measure T Pass To pay for general municipal expenses, shall the City increase the annual business license tax for liquid storage facilities up to $115.28 per one thousand cubic feet of liquid storage capacity, and provide for an offset for sales tax revenue received?
SAN MATEO 11/5/2013 Foster City Measure U Pass To pay for general city services enjoyed by all residents and businesses in Foster City, including services such as police, fire, parks, recreation, and repairing and maintaining the levee, lagoon, streets and other infrastructure, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the City's business license tax effective January 1, 2014? SAN MATEO 11/5/2013 Pacifica Measure V Fail Without raising the current 6.5% rate, and to fund fire protection; emergency services; police protection; Meals on Wheels and other senior citizen services; street, sidewalk and pothole repair; and other essential services, shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City of Pacifica's Utility Users Tax adding telecommunications services, requiring equal treatment regardless of technology used, maintaining senior exemptions and adding independent citizens oversight, with all funds staying in Pacifica and no funds for Sacramento?
SAN MATEO 11/5/2013 Portola Valley Measure Q Pass Do the People of the Town of Portola Valley adopt an ordinance that continues the reduction of the general purpose Utility Users Tax levied on telephone, gas, water and electricity, set forth in Chapter 3.32 of the Portola Valley Municipal Code, from 5.5% to 4.5% on the charges made for such utility services for a period of four years from July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2018?
SANTA CLARA 11/5/2013 Palo Alto Measure D Fail Shall the Palo Alto Municipal Code be amended to rezone the property located at 567-595 Maybell Avenue from R-2 Low Density Residential and RM-15 Multiple Family Residential to Planned Community Overlay Zone to include 12 single family units and 60 units of affordable senior housing?
SANTA CLARA 11/5/2013 Sunnyvale Measure A Pass To help reduce the City’s elections costs through consolidation with County and State elections, shall the Sunnyvale City Charter be amended to change the City’s general municipal elections from odd numbered years to even numbered years, with the next general municipal election scheduled for 2016, and to provide a one time, one year extension to councilmember terms, and create a temporary one year mayoral term to enable the transition to even- numbered year elections?
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES ────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 19
TABLE 1.2 TEXT FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES BY COUNTY, 2013
SANTA CLARA 11/5/2013 Sunnyvale Measure B Pass Shall the Sunnyvale Municipal Code be amended to increase the transient occupancy tax rate (commonly called “hotel tax”) charged to persons who occupy hotel or motel rooms in the City for 30 days or less from 9.5% to 10.5% in order to help maintain the City’s ability to fund basic services such as public safety and streets, trees, and sidewalk maintenance, and to keep parity with neighboring cities’ hotel tax rates, effective January, 2014?
SANTA CLARA 11/5/2013 Sunnyvale Measure C Pass Shall the City of Sunnyvale adopt a gun safety ordinance to require: 1) reporting to police, within 48 hours, known loss or theft of a firearm; 2) storing firearms in residences in a locked container or disabling them with a trigger lock when not in the owner’s immediate possession; 3) prohibiting the possession of ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds, with certain exceptions; and 4) logging and tracking of ammunition sales within the City of Sunnyvale?
SANTA CRUZ 6/4/2013 Watsonville Measure T Fail Should the City of Watsonville amend its Urban Limit Line to allow for the possible annexation of approximately 95 acres of agricultural land to the City limits for future economic development and jobs?
SANTA CRUZ 11/5/2013 Scotts Valley Measure U Pass Shall a temporary one-half of one percent sales tax rate increase be approved for an eight year period to keep the budget balanced and to preserve police, parks, recreation and other city services for the residents of Scotts Valley?
SOLANO 11/5/2013 Vallejo Measure E Pass Shall Charter sections 302, 319, and 1000 be amended to change the City's general municipal elections from odd-numbered to even-numbered years to consolidate with Statewide elections and reduce election costs by approximately $205,000 and to extend the term of the existing council members and mayor approximately 13 months to make that transition, and change the date elected candidates and the vice mayor assume office?
SONOMA 11/5/2013 Rohnert Park Measure A Pass (2/3 required) To preserve the safely and character of Rohnert Park, and maintain/protect general City services, including 9-1-1 emergency response; fire protection, neighborhood police patrols; gang/sex offender enforcement; disaster preparedness; street paving/pothole repair; park maintenance; and other essential services, shall the City of Rohnert Park continue a voter-approved ½ cent sales tax, subject to annual audits and public review, keeping money from Sacramento, and without raising existing tax rates?
SONOMA 11/19/2013 Sonoma Measure B Fail Shall the Hotel Limitation Measure be adopted?
STANISLAUS 11/5/2013 Modesto Measure V Pass Shall the City provide sewer service to the following area of the Modesto General Plan? The unincorporated area designated "Airport Neighborhood" or the east portion of “Area 12" in Modesto's 2009 Urban Growth Review. The area is generally bordered by Hyde Street on the north, Conejo Avenue on the east, Oregon Drive on the south, and Santa Rosa Avenue on the west.
STANISLAUS 11/5/2013 Modesto Measure X Fail To address crime, gangs, drugs and youth violence, improve the local economy/jobs, and maintain/improve essential City services, including: Police/Fire Protection; Neighborhood Police Patrols; 9-1-1 Emergency Response; Gang Crime, Theft and Burglary Prevention; Street/Pothole Repair; Programs Attracting Businesses/Creating Jobs; and Other City Services. Shall the City of Modesto enact a one-cent sales tax, for 6 years, with independent annual audits, citizens’ oversight, and no money for Sacramento?
STANISLAUS 11/5/2013 Waterford Measure W Fail (2/3 required) Shall the city of Waterford be allowed to levy a special tax every year within Community Facilities District No. 2013-1 (Public Services) to pay for landscape and lighting services and replace the Lighting and Landscaping Districts which are running deficits, according to the rates established by the city Council in Resolution of Formation, beginning July 1, 2014, and shall the City be authorized to spend for these services all that is receives?
YOLO 3/5/2013 Davis Measure I Pass Shall Ordinance No. 2399 - be adopted, which grants permission to the City of Davis to proceed with the Davis Woodland Water Supply Project, to provide surface water as an additional supply of water, subject to the adoption of water rates in accordance with the California Constitution (Proposition 218)?
CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 20
TABLE 1.3 SUMMARY OF ELECTION OUTCOMES FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES BY TYPE OF MEASURE AND COUNTY, 2013 CHARTER POLICY/POSITION TAXES ADVISORY INITIATIVE RECALL ORDINANCE ALL CITY MEASURES AMENDMENT STATEMENT PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL TOTAL
CONTRA COSTA 2 0 2 0 4 0 4 FRESNO 3 1 0 1 3 2 5 LAKE 0 1 0 1 1 LOS ANGELES 11 3 3 3 7 8 1 0 22 14 36 MARIN 4 0 4 0 4 MENDOCINO 1 0 1 0 1 MERCED 2 0 1 0 3 0 3 MONTEREY 1 0 1 0 1 NAPA 1 0 1 0 1 ORANGE 0 1 0 1 1 RIVERSIDE 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 5 SAN BERNARDINO 1 1 2 1 2 0 5 2 7 SAN DIEGO 1 0 1 0 1 SAN JOAQUIN 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 SAN MATEO 4 1 4 1 5 SANTA CLARA 1 0 1 0 1 1 3 1 4 SANTA CRUZ 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 SOLANO 1 0 1 0 1 SONOMA 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 STANISLAUS 0 2 1 0 1 2 3 YOLO 1 0 1 0 1
All Counties 34 10 7 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 16 14 1 0 61 29 90
TABLE 1.4 SUMMARY OF ELECTION OUTCOMES FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURES BY TOPIC OF MEASURE AND COUNTY, 2013 GENERAL LAND USE SAFETY GOVERNANCE TRANSPORT SERVICES REVENUE OTHER ALL CITY MEASURES PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL TOTAL CONTRA COSTA 2 2 0 4 0 4
FRESNO 1 0 1 2 1 3 2 5
LAKE 0 1 0 1 1
LOS ANGELES 1 2 1 1 7 6 12 3 1 2 22 14 36
MARIN 4 4 0 4
MENDOCINO 1 0 1 0 1
MERCED 2 0 1 3 0 3
MONTEREY 1 0 1 0 1
NAPA 1 0 1 0 1
ORANGE 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
RIVERSIDE 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 2 3 5
SAN BERNARDINO 2 2 1 1 1 5 2 7
SAN DIEGO 1 1 0 1
SAN JOAQUIN 1 0 1 0 2 0 2
SAN MATEO 4 1 4 1 5
SANTA CLARA 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 1 4
SANTA CRUZ 0 1 1 0 1 1 2
SOLANO 1 0 1 0 1
SONOMA 0 1 1 0 1 1 2
STANISLAUS 1 1 0 1 1 2 3
YOLO 1 0 1 0 1
All Counties 5 7 5 2 16 8 1 0 2 2 31 8 1 2 61 29 90
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 21
PART 2 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED ALAMEDA 5/7/2013 Pleasanton CITY COUNCIL Short Narum Kathy Businesswoman/Planning Commis. No 4 4,643 11,732 39.6% Yes Miller David Smartphone Engineering Executive No 4 3,159 11,732 26.9% No Sanwong Olivia Market Research Analyst No 4 2,014 11,732 17.2% No Hamilton Mark Local Businessman/Veteran No 4 1,873 11,732 16.0% No
ALPINE No City Contests
AMADOR No City Contests
BUTTE No City Contests
CALAVERAS No City Contests
COLUSA No City Contests
CONTRA COSTA 11/5/2013 San Ramon CITY COUNCIL Full Sachs Harry Teacher No 4 4,669 14,788 31.6% Yes Hudson David E. "Dave" San Ramon Vice Mayor Yes 4 4,249 14,788 28.7% Yes Matsumoto René Community Program Leader No 4 4,009 14,788 27.1% No Von Thury Thomas Lawyer No 4 1,775 14,788 12.0% No
MAYOR Full Clarkson Bill Mayor, Business Owner Yes 1 6,883 7,314 94.1% Yes
DEL NORTE No City Contests
EL DORADO No City Contests
FRESNO No City Contests
GLENN No City Contests
HUMBOLDT No City Contests
IMPERIAL 11/5/2013 Brawley CITY COUNCIL Full Couchman Sam Incumbent Yes 3 1,311 3,435 38.2% Yes
Noriega Helen M. Board Member No 3 1,091 3,435 31.8% Yes
Miranda Miguel C. Incumbent Yes 3 1,013 3,435 29.5% No
El Centro CITY COUNCIL Full Cardenas Alex Executive Director No 3 1,717 4,462 38.5% Yes
Viegas-Walker Cheryl Incumbent Yes 3 1,401 4,462 31.4% Yes
Olivas Tomas Public Administrator No 3 1,329 4,462 29.8% No
INYO No City Contests
KERN 6/4/2013 Bakersfield CITY COUNCIL 1 Short Rivera P. "Willie" District Coordinator No 6 764 2,104 36.3% Yes Martinez Efren Businessman No 6 445 2,104 21.2% No
Dean Marvin Business Owner No 6 319 2,104 15.2% No
Campbell Stephanie Business Owner No 6 227 2,104 10.8% No
Powell Tomeka Grantwriter/Business Owner No 6 214 2,104 10.2% No
Vereen Donald Student No 6 135 2,104 6.4% No
1 Write-in candidates, when reported by the county, have been included in the total votes cast. For these contests, the sum of the candidate votes is less than the total votes cast. R To be elected if recall measure passes.
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 25 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 26
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED KINGS No City Contests
LAKE No City Contests
LASSEN No City Contests
LOS ANGELES 2/26/2013 Burbank CITY CLERK Full Mullins Zizette Appointed Incumbent No 3 4,437 8,800 50.4% Yes Salas Gloria G. Legal Administrator No 3 2,683 8,800 30.5% No von Sonn Nonna Burbank City Employee No 3 1,680 8,800 19.1% No Frutos Robert "Bob" Police Officer No 6 5,262 24,084 21.8% Yes
CITY COUNCIL Full Gordon David Councilmember/Optometrist Yes 6 4,705 24,084 19.5% Runoff
Talamantes Jess A. Burbank City Councilmember Yes 6 4,341 24,084 18.0% Runoff
Golonski Dave Burbank City Councilmember Yes 6 4,113 24,084 17.1% Runoff
Nos David Small Business Owner No 6 3,165 24,084 13.1% Runoff Guillen Jr. Juan J. Small Business Owner No 6 2,498 24,084 10.4% No
CITY TREASURER Full Kukta Debbie Merta Appointed City Treasurer No 1 6,993 6,993 100.0% Yes
3/5/2013 Azusa CITY CLERK Full Cornejo Jr. Jeffrey Lawrence Commissioner No 4 923 2,516 36.7% Yes Rosales Jorge V. Retired Architectural Professional No 4 708 2,516 28.1% No Rentschler Russell Bryan Businessman No 4 485 2,516 19.3% No Mills Stephanie Carmona Community Volunteer No 4 400 2,516 15.9% No
CITY COUNCIL Full Gonzales Robert Azusa Councilmember Yes 6 1,445 4,814 30.0% Yes Alvarez E d w a r d Auditor/Military Reservist No 6 994 4,814 20.6% Yes Castro Mercedes Businessowner/Marketing Spect. No 6 851 4,814 17.7% No Vogel Jeri Small Business Owner No 6 695 4,814 14.4% No Benavides Sandra Project Manager/Realtor No 6 681 4,814 14.1% No C a r o Mark A. Expediter/Businessowner/CEO No 6 148 4,814 3.1% No
CITY TREASURER Full Vasquez Jr. Arthur Accountant No 2 1,363 2,534 53.8% Yes Hamilton Marcene Incumbent Yes 2 1,171 2,534 46.2% No
MAYOR Full Rocha Joseph Romero Mayor - A z u s a Yes 1 2,335 2,335 100.0% Yes
Bell CITY COUNCIL Full Quintana Ana Maria Councilwoman/Attorney Yes 6 1,099 3,368 32.6% Yes R o m e r o Alicia School Dean No 6 725 3,368 21.5% Yes Harber Danny Councilmember Yes 6 665 3,368 19.7% No Saenz Nora A. No Ballot Designation No 6 398 3,368 11.8% No Gannon Donna I. Retired No 6 369 3,368 11.0% No Mourad Yamel "Jimmy" Business Manager No 6 112 3,368 3.3% No
Bellflower CITY COUNCIL Full Koops Dan Council Member/Businessman Yes 3 2,193 5,497 39.9% Yes Larsen Scott A. CPA/Council Member Yes 3 2,048 5,497 37.3% Yes Munoz U. "Alex" Business Investor/Contractor No 3 1,256 5,497 22.8% No
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 CITY COUNCIL Short Schnablegger Ron Business Owner No 4 1,584 3,199 49.5% Yes (continued) Melliz Luis Field Representative No 4 825 3,199 25.8% No Willingham Gloria Professor No 4 702 3,199 21.9% No Yahye R. Professor No 4 88 3,199 2.8% No
Beverly Hills CITY COUNCIL Full Mirisch John A. Vice Mayor/Film Executive Yes 6 2,837 11,365 25.0% Yes Brien William W. Mayor/Orthopedic Surgeon Yes 6 2,621 11,365 23.1% Yes Krasne Nancy H. Frm. Cil. Mbr. Mayor/ Teacher No 6 2,540 11,365 22.3% Yes Rosenstein Brian Planning Commis. Vice-Chairman No 6 2,533 11,365 22.3% No Cohan Katherine Attorney/Mother/Mediator No 6 498 11,365 4.4% No Talei Michael Tech Ent. StudentFreelance.com No 6 336 11,365 3.0% No
CITY TREASURER Full Finkel Eliot M. Investment Advisor Yes 1 2,673 2,673 100.0% Yes
Calabasas CITY COUNCIL Full Maurer Mary Sue Mayor/Teacher/Parent Yes 4 2,491 8,242 30.2% Yes Bozajian James R. Calabasas City Councilmember Yes 4 2,475 8,242 30.0% Yes Shapiro David J. Attorney No 4 2,196 8,242 26.6% Yes Thomas Judy Businessowner No 4 1,080 8,242 13.1% No
Carson CITY COUNCIL Full Gipson Mike A. Councilmember Yes 8 6,360 21,666 29.4% Yes Robles Albert Constitutional Attorney/Professor No 8 5,170 21,666 23.9% Yes Ruiz-Raber Julie City Council Member Yes 8 4,616 21,666 21.3% No Brimmer Charlotte Planning Commissioner No 8 2,183 21,666 10.1% No Boggs Rita R. Retired Businesswoman/Professor No 8 2,047 21,666 9.4% No Gordon Joseph Businessman No 8 585 21,666 2.7% No Anyaka Stephen C. No Ballot Designation No 8 381 21,666 1.8% No Muckey Timothy R. Educator No 8 324 21,666 1.5% No
MAYOR Full Dear Jim Mayor, City of Carson Yes 2 7,340 12,272 59.8% Yes Holmes Lula Davis Councilmember/Retired Supt. No 2 4,932 12,272 40.2% No
Cerritos CITY COUNCIL Full Chen Carol Councilmember/Business Owner Yes 7 3,795 13,436 28.2% Yes Ray George Businessman No 7 3,574 13,436 26.6% Yes Yokoyama Frank Aurelio Businessman/Attorney No 7 2,939 13,436 21.9% No Kang James Boardmember, ABC USD No 7 1,199 13,436 8.9% No Ma K.Y. Retired Police Officer No 7 1,030 13,436 7.7% No Estella Alejandro Retired Social Worker No 7 678 13,436 5.0% No Valencia Gerad Homemaker No 7 221 13,436 1.6% No
Claremont CITY COUNCIL Full Schroeder Larry City Councilmember Yes 3 3,369 7,412 45.5% Yes Calaycay Corey City Councilmember Yes 3 3,204 7,412 43.2% Yes Keenan Michael Professional Window Cleaner No 3 839 7,412 11.3% No
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 27 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 28
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Commerce CITY COUNCIL Full Del Rio Tina Baca Councilmember Yes 6 686 3,549 19.3% Yes (continued) Altamirano Ivan Appt. Council Mbr./Businessman No 6 635 3,549 17.9% Yes Leon Lilia R. Councilmember/Businesswoman Yes 6 623 3,549 17.6% Yes Flores Joanna Educator No 6 589 3,549 16.6% No Valencia Jaime Accounting Associate No 6 551 3,549 15.5% No Gonzalez Art A. Business Owner/Commissioner No 6 465 3,549 13.1% No
Covina CITY CLERK Full Walczak Mary Lou Executive Assistant No 1 2,529 2,529 100.0% Yes
CITY COUNCIL Full Stapleton Kevin Bus. man/Volunteer/Councilman Yes 4 2,013 7,448 27.0% Yes King John C. Councilmember/Business Mgr. Yes 4 1,860 7,448 25.0% Yes Marquez Jorge A. Field Deputy No 4 1,837 7,448 24.7% Yes Manning Kay University Administrator No 4 1,738 7,448 23.3% No
CITY TREASURER Full Cobbett Geoffrey Community Volunteer No 1 2,461 2,461 100.0% Yes
Cudahy CITY COUNCIL Full Garcia Chris Business Consultant No 6 543 2,131 25.5% Yes Guerrero Jack M. Interim Councilman/C.P.A No 6 513 2,131 24.1% Yes Pivaral Ruben Teacher No 6 328 2,131 15.4% No Lara Richard Procurement Aid No 6 289 2,131 13.6% No Aguilera Martin Garment Industry Supervisor No 6 273 2,131 12.8% No Velasquez Isaac D. Commercial Broker No 6 185 2,131 8.7% No
Short Sanchez Baru A. Auditor/C.P.A No 3 533 1,178 45.2% Yes Barrios Josue Councilmember/Business Owner Yes 3 366 1,178 31.1% No Iglesias Richard Purchasing Officer No 3 279 1,178 23.7% No
Gardena CITY CLERK Full Semenza Mina Realtor/Community Volunteer No 3 1,699 4,974 34.2% Yes Kaskanian Harout "Art" Businessman/Commissioner No 3 1,642 4,974 33.0% No Tsukiyama Shannon N. Entrepreneur No 3 1,633 4,974 32.8% No
CITY COUNCIL Full Cerda Tasha City Council Member Yes 5 2,611 8,702 30.0% Yes Terauchi Terrence "Terry" L.A. County Criminal Prosecutor No 5 2,301 8,702 26.4% Yes Tanaka Rodney G. Pastor/Retired Policeman No 5 2,242 8,702 25.8% No Henderson Mark E. College Director/Commissioner No 5 1,199 8,702 13.8% No Evans Kathleen "Suzy" Business Owner/Producer No 5 349 8,702 4.0% No
CITY TREASURER Full Tsukiyama J. Ingrid Incumbent Yes 1 4,496 4,496 100.0% Yes
MAYOR Full Tanaka Paul K. Mayor/Undersheriff Yes 2 3,035 5,228 58.1% Yes Johnson Rachel C. Educator/City Councilmember No 2 1,874 5,228 35.8% No
Huntington Park CITY COUNCIL Full Macias Karina Community Justice Coordinator No 4 1,228 4,311 28.5% Yes Amezquita Valentin Palos Environmental Engineer No 4 1,123 4,311 26.0% Yes Molina Andy Council Member Yes 4 991 4,311 23.0% No
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Huntington Park CITY COUNCIL Full Guerrero Elba Council Member Yes 4 969 4,311 22.5% No (continued) La Canada Flintridge CITY COUNCIL Full Curtis Jon Attorney/Business Owner No 3 2,294 5,643 40.7% Yes Spence David A. Councilmember/Businessman Yes 3 2,212 5,643 39.2% Yes Layton Joe Accountant No 3 1,137 5,643 20.1% No
La Habra Heights CITY COUNCIL Full Bergman Brian Councilmember/Retired Manager Yes 5 774 3,161 24.5% Yes Higgins Michael L. Business Owner No 5 735 3,161 23.3% Yes Miller Kyle Commercial Property Broker No 5 613 3,161 19.4% Yes Jeng Chester Dentist/Businessman/Attorney No 5 557 3,161 17.6% No Edwards George L. Small Business Owner No 5 482 3,161 15.2% No
La Mirada CITY COUNCIL Full Deal Pauline L. Appointed Incumbent No 5 1,903 6,569 29.0% Yes Sarega Andrew Police Officer/Businessman No 5 1,451 6,569 22.1% Yes Keithly Steve Planning Commis./Businessman No 5 1,440 6,569 21.9% No Garcia Gabe Incumbent Yes 5 980 6,569 14.9% No Gray Randy School District Administrator No 5 795 6,569 12.1% No
Los Angeles CITY ATTORNEY Full Feuer Mike Assembly Member/Attorney No 4 151,488 343,499 44.1% Runoff
Trutanich Carmen "Nuch" Los Angeles City Attorney Yes 4 102,050 343,499 29.7% Runoff Smith Greg Public Safety Attorney No 4 60,253 343,499 17.5% No Weiss Noel Attorney/Community Advocate No 4 29,708 343,499 8.6% No
CITY CONTROLLER Full Galperin Ron Efficiency Commis./Businessman No 6 125,006 330,938 37.8% Runoff
Zine Dennis P. Los Angeles City Councilman No 6 120,747 330,938 36.5% Runoff Joya Analilia Disability Advocate/Teacher No 6 31,881 330,938 9.6% No Bornstein Jeff Business Owner No 6 22,912 330,938 6.9% No Patel Ankur Student/Labor Organizer No 6 18,955 330,938 5.7% No Brazeman Cary Local Company Executive No 6 11,437 330,938 3.5% No
CITY COUNCIL 1 Full Cedillo Gilbert California State Lawmaker No 3 8,390 17,010 49.3% Runoff
Gardea Jose A. Councilmember's Chief Deputy No 3 7,392 17,010 43.5% Runoff Rosas Jesse Businessman No 3 1,228 17,010 3.4% No
3 Full Blumenfield Bob Assembly Member, State of CA No 6 12,974 24,985 51.9% Yes Pearson Joyce J. Certified Accountant/Attorney No 6 4,998 24,985 20.0% No Iaccino Cary T. Independent Business Owner No 6 2,404 24,985 9.6% No Badger Elizabeth Small Business Owner No 6 2,328 24,985 9.3% No Presberg Steven E. City Investigator/Advocate No 6 1,171 24,985 4.7% No
CITY COUNCIL 3 Full Silverstein Scott Businessman/Boardmember No 6 1,110 24,985 4.4% No
5 Full Koretz Paul City Councilmember Yes 2 22,064 29,540 74.7% Yes H e r d Mark Matthew Neighborhood Council Board Mbr. No 2 7,476 29,540 25.3% No
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 29 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 30
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Los Angeles CITY COUNCIL 7 Full Fuentes Felipe California State Legislator No 4 9,912 19,291 51.4% Yes (continued) Chase Nicole Education Advocate No 4 5,248 19,291 27.2% No Clark Krystee Actor/Community Volunteer No 4 2,087 19,291 10.8% No Barron Jesse David Housing Inspector/Activist No 4 2,044 19,291 10.6% No
9 Full Price Jr. Curren D. State Senator/Professor No 7 3,117 11,609 26.8% Runoff
Cubas Ana Councilmember’s Chief Deputy No 7 2,843 11,609 24.5% Runoff Davis Mike California State Assemblymen No 7 1,785 11,609 15.4% No H a r a Terry Deputy Police Chief No 7 1,337 11,609 11.5% No Roberts David Community Development Advocate No 7 1,151 11,609 9.9% No Gochez Ron Teacher No 7 995 11,609 8.6% No Aldana Manuel "Manny" School Council Boardmember No 7 381 11,609 3.3% No
11 Full Bonin Mike Councilmember’s Chief Deputy No 4 22,542 36,452 61.8% Yes Hess Tina Prosecutor No 4 6,377 36,452 17.5% No Sutton Frederick Community Advocate No 4 4,257 36,452 11.7% No Bostick Odysseus Teacher No 4 3,276 36,452 9.0% No
13 Full O'Farrell Mitch Councilmember's Senior Advisor No 12 4,530 24,034 18.8% Runoff
Choi John J. Commis./Community Organizer No 12 4,008 24,034 16.7% Runoff Kbushyan Sam Neighborhood Council Board Mbr. No 12 2,731 24,034 11.4% No De Ocampo Alexander Cruz Charitable Foundation Director No 12 2,636 24,034 11.0% No Post Josh Deputy Attorney General No 12 2,606 24,034 10.8% No Szabo Matt Deputy Mayor No 12 1,747 24,034 7.3% No Negrete Robert Senator's District Director No 12 1,706 24,034 7.1% No Pescador Octavio University Professor No 12 1,532 24,034 6.4% No Sigala Jose Neighborhood Council President No 12 874 24,034 3.6% No Mack Emile Assistant Fire Chief No 12 845 24,034 3.5% No Schaefer Michael Small Business Owner No 12 455 24,034 1.9% No Haraldson Roberto Small Business Owner No 12 364 24,034 1.5% No
15 Full Buscaino Joe Los Angeles City Councilmember No 2 14,317 17,230 83.1% Yes Law James T. Minister/Disability Advocate No 2 2,913 17,230 16.9% No
MAYOR Full Garcetti Eric Los Angeles City Councilmember No 8 121,930 367,922 33.1% Runoff
Greuel Wendy J. Los Angeles City Controller No 8 106,748 367,922 29.0% Runoff James Kevin Radio Broadcaster/Attorney No 8 60,154 367,922 16.3% No Perry Jan Los Angeles City Councilwoman No 8 58,472 367,922 15.9% No Pleitez Emanuel Alberto Technology Company Executive No 8 15,263 367,922 4.1% No Sandler Norton Factory Production Worker No 8 2,002 367,922 0.5% No
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Los Angeles MAYOR Full Miller Addie M. Citywide Advocate No 8 1,810 367,922 0.5% No (continued) Draiman Yehuda 'YJ' Neighborhood Council Secretary No 8 1,543 367,922 0.4% No
Manhattan Beach CITY COUNCIL Full Powell Wayne Council Mbr./Community Volunteer Yes 6 3,986 13,832 28.8% Yes Burton Mark Retired Municipal Attorney No 6 2,973 13,832 21.5% Yes D'Errico Tony Local Business Owner No 6 2,393 13,832 17.3% Yes Lipps Mark Small Business Owner No 6 2,090 13,832 15.1% No Ward Mitch Local Business Owner Yes 6 2,088 13,832 15.1% No Ngo Viet Retired Technical Specialist No 6 302 13,832 2.2% No
CITY TREASURER Full Lilligren Tim City Treasurer/CPA Yes 1 3,903 3,903 100.0% Yes
Monterey Park CITY CLERK Full Chang Vincent Dionicio Attorney/Business Owner No 3 2,793 4,552 61.4% Yes Schwartz Jeff Chess Instructor No 3 1,098 4,552 24.1% No Alvarez Neal R. Theatre House Manager No 3 661 4,552 14.5% No
CITY COUNCIL Full Liang Hans Deputy Probation Officer No 5 2,778 8,674 32.0% Yes Chan Peter Business Owner No 5 2,494 8,674 28.8% Yes Sullivan Larry C. Retired Businessman No 5 2,125 8,674 24.5% No Guzman Tom Community Volunteer No 5 640 8,674 7.4% No Avila Joe Ray Handyman No 5 637 8,674 7.3% No
CITY TREASURER Full Leon Joseph City Treasurer/Attorney Yes 2 2,583 4,746 54.4% Yes Lam Stephen Business Owner No 2 2,163 4,746 45.6% No
Norwalk CITY COUNCIL Full Mendez Michael "Mike" Councilmember/Businessman Yes 6 1,925 8,372 23.0% Yes Kelley Cheri Councilmember/Businesswoman Yes 6 1,885 8,372 22.5% Yes Aranda Enrique Educator/City Commissioner No 6 1,852 8,372 22.1% No Adams Darryl Rodney Educator/School Trustee No 6 1,537 8,372 18.4% No Martinez Candy CEO/Businesswoman No 6 867 8,372 10.4% No Mesinas Perez Bryan C. Student No 6 306 8,372 3.7% No
Pasadena CITY COUNCIL 3 Full Kennedy John J. Senior VP Nonprofit No 3 674 1,206 55.9% Yes Trone Ishmael Businessman/Financial Consultant No 3 464 1,206 38.5% No Benson Nicholas Minister/Educator No 3 68 1,206 5.6% No
5 Full Gordo Victor M. Councilmember/Attorney Yes 2 910 1,021 89.1% Yes Estrada Israel Nonprofit Executive Director No 2 111 1,021 10.9% No
7 Full Tornek Terry Councilmember/Business Executive Yes 1 1,325 1,325 100.0% Yes
Redondo Beach CITY ATTORNEY Full Webb Michael W. Redondo Beach City Attorney Yes 1 9,818 9,818 100.0% Yes
CITY COUNCIL 1 Full Ginsburg Jeff Small Business Owner No 4 1,223 2,960 41.3% Runoff
Light Jim Engineer/Executive No 4 844 2,960 28.5% Runoff Fine Kimberly Business Owner No 4 733 2,960 24.8% No
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 31 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 32
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Redondo Beach CITY COUNCIL 1 Full Prado Dianne Public Interest Attorney No 4 160 2,960 5.4% No (continued) 2 Full Brand Bill Redondo Beach Council Member Yes 3 1,671 2,966 56.3% Yes Jackson Michael Businessman/Harbor Commissioner No 3 999 2,966 33.7% No Kowalski Susan Businesswoman No 3 296 2,966 10.0% No
4 Full Sammarco Stephen "Steve" Small Business Owner No 3 762 1,856 41.1% Runoff
Jeffreys Jan City of Redondo Beach Commis. No 3 592 1,856 31.9% Runoff Stern Julian R. Student No 3 502 1,856 27.0% No
MAYOR Full Aspel Steve Small Business Owner No 4 4,871 12,321 39.5% Runoff
Kilroy Matt RBUSD Teacher/Councilmember No 4 3,500 12,321 28.4% Runoff Aust Pat City Council Member No 4 2,675 12,321 21.7% No Coleman Eric Artist No 4 1,275 12,321 10.3% No
Rolling Hills CITY COUNCIL Full Dieringer Bea Deputy District Attorney No 4 484 1,502 32.2% Yes Pieper Jeff Businessman No 4 400 1,502 26.6% Yes Karpf Spencer L. Businessowner No 4 317 1,502 21.1% No Heinsheimer Tom Incumbent No 4 301 1,502 20.0% No
Rosemead CITY COUNCIL Full Ly Steven Rosemead Council/Businessman Yes 4 1,940 6,699 29.0% Yes Clark Margaret Council Member/Educator Yes 4 1,877 6,699 28.0% Yes Armenta Sandra Mayor/Educator Yes 4 1,818 6,699 27.1% Yes C h i n Janet Communications Director/Veteran No 4 1,064 6,699 15.9% No
San Dimas CITY COUNCIL Full Templeman Jeff Councilmember/Retired Chief Yes 2 2,100 4,493 46.7% Yes Bertone Denis Councilmember/Retired Educator Yes 2 2,076 4,493 46.2% Yes
MAYOR Full Morris Curtis W. Attorney Yes 1 2,373 2,373 100.0% Yes
San Gabriel CITY CLERK Full Andrews Ellie City Clerk Yes 1 2,311 2,311 100.0% Yes
CITY COUNCIL Full Pu Jason Attorney/Community Advocate No 5 1,817 8,419 21.6% Yes Liao Chin Ho Structural Engineering No 5 1,714 8,419 20.4% Yes Sawkins Kevin Attorney/Councilmember Yes 5 1,713 8,419 20.3% Yes De La Torre Mario Vice Mayor/Businessman Yes 5 1,616 8,419 19.2% No Gutierrez David Councilmember/Business Owner Yes 5 1,559 8,419 18.5% No
CITY TREASURER Full Janosik John City Treasurer/Attorney Yes 1 2,152 2,152 100.0% Yes
Signal Hill CITY COUNCIL Full Noll Mike Incumbent Yes 7 633 3,580 17.7% Yes Woods Lori Y. Businessowner/Entrepreneur/Mom No 7 613 3,580 17.1% Yes Wilson Edward H.J. Accountant/Councilman Yes 7 547 3,580 15.3% Yes Ward Ellen Incumbent Yes 7 528 3,580 14.7% No Wise Elizabeth Intermediary/Petrol. Businessowner No 7 437 3,580 12.2% No Mendoza Robert Business Owner No 7 429 3,580 12.0% No
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED LOS ANGELES 3/5/2013 Signal Hill CITY COUNCIL Full Sciortino Nancy Business Manager No 7 393 3,580 11.0% No (continued) South Gate CITY CLERK Full Avalos Carmen City Clerk/Teacher Yes 1 2,978 2,978 100.0% Yes Hurtado Gil Councilmember Yes 3 2,060 5,505 37.4% Yes DeWitt Bill Council Member Yes 3 2,047 5,505 37.2% Yes Reyes Ricardo Business Owner No 3 1,398 5,505 25.4% No
CITY TREASURER Full Bernal Maria "Belen" City Treasurer Yes 1 2,856 2,856 100.0% Yes
Temple City CITY COUNCIL Full Yu Vincent Temple City Councilmber./Architect Yes 4 1,791 5,047 35.5% Yes Chavez Tom Incumbent Yes 4 1,685 5,047 33.4% Yes Wong Matthew J. Community News Publisher No 4 1,020 5,047 20.2% No Lisk Nicholas J. Retired Contract Administrator No 4 551 5,047 10.9% No
West Hollywood CITY COUNCIL Full Prang Jeffrey Member, W. Hollywood City Council Yes 9 2,709 9,475 28.6% Yes Duran John Jude Member, W. Hollywood City Council Yes 9 2,366 9,475 25.0% Yes Martin Steve Family Law Attorney No 9 1,591 9,475 16.8% No Borelli Sam Consultant/Safety Commissioner No 9 929 9,475 9.8% No Landavazo Christopher T. Deputy Sheriff/Educator No 9 917 9,475 9.7% No Schukraft Tristan Technology Entrepreneur No 9 418 9,475 4.4% No Garzilli Nick Sustainable Transport Entrepreneur No 9 252 9,475 2.7% No Demille Tom Community Organizer No 9 226 9,475 2.4% No Wiggs Rusty Executive Director No 9 67 9,475 0.7% No
4/2/2013 Glendale CITY CLERK Full Kassakhian Ardashes "Ardy" City Clerk Yes 2 12,319 19,762 62.3% Yes Landregan Stephanie Educator/Businesswoman No 2 7,443 19,762 37.7% No
CITY COUNCIL Full Najarian Ara Glendale Councilmember Yes 12 10,165 57,251 17.8% Yes Friedman Laura Councilmember/Business Owner Yes 12 8,088 57,251 14.1% Yes Sinanyan Zareh J. Attorney No 12 7,379 57,251 12.9% Yes Keuroghelian Chahe Small Business Owner No 12 7,023 57,251 12.3% No Engel Sam Neighborhood Services Admstr. No 12 5,074 57,251 8.9% No Fuentes Edith Retired City Administrator No 12 4,194 57,251 7.3% No Barnes Rick Realtor No 12 4,096 57,251 7.2% No Mohill Mike Retired Businessman No 12 2,906 57,251 5.1% No
Glendale CITY COUNCIL Full Black Jefferson Teacher/Parent/Businessman No 12 2,616 57,251 4.6% No Molano Herbert Business Owner No 12 2,586 57,251 4.5% No Kazazian Aram California Licensed Architect No 12 1,782 57,251 3.1% No Kedikian Roland Bankruptcy Attorney No 12 1,342 57,251 2.3% No
CITY TREASURER Full Manoukian Rafi Councilmember/CPA/MBA No 1 14,560 14,560 100.0% Yes
Inglewood CITY COUNCIL 1 Full Dotson George Business Owner No 5 1,271 2,832 44.9% Runoff
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 33 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 34
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED
LOS ANGELES 4/2/2013 Inglewood CITY COUNCIL 1 Full Stevens Mike Councilman No 5 888 2,832 31.4% Runoff (continued) Tabor Daniel Community Devel. Professional Yes 5 494 2,832 17.4% No F o r d Felicia Executive Director No 5 126 2,832 4.4% No Fisher Leroy Graphic Artist No 5 53 2,832 1.9% No
CITY COUNCIL 2 Full Padilla Alex Retired Police Captain No 4 961 1,978 48.6% Runoff
Dunlap Judy Councilwomen Yes 4 651 1,978 32.9% Runoff Davis Jean Professional/HIV Specialist No 4 236 1,978 11.9% No S o t o Joseph Businessman No 4 130 1,978 6.6% No
4/9/2013 Burbank CITY COUNCIL Full Gordon David Councilmember/Optometrist Yes 4 5,430 19,658 27.6% Yes Talamantes Jess A. Burbank City Councilmember Yes 4 5,290 19,658 26.9% Yes Golonski Dave Burbank City Councilmember Yes 4 4,571 19,658 23.3% No Nos David Small Business Owner No 4 4,367 19,658 22.2% No
Monrovia CITY CLERK Full Atkins Alice D. Appointed City Clerk No 1 2,521 2,521 100.0% Yes
CITY COUNCIL Full Blackburn Alexander C. Attorney No 2 1,840 4,582 40.2% Yes Spicer Larry J. Community Volunteer No 2 1,658 4,582 36.2% Yes
CITY TREASURER Full Baker Stephen R. Incumbent Yes 1 2,529 2,529 100.0% Yes
MAYOR Full Lutz Mary Ann Mayor/Business Owner Yes 1 2,537 2,537 100.0% Yes
Vernon CITY COUNCIL Full Davis William J. Mayor, City of Vernon Yes 1 34 35 97.1% Yes
4/16/2013 Compton CITY ATTORNEY Full Cornwell Craig J. City Attorney Yes 1 5,213 5,213 100.0% Yes
CITY CLERK Full G o d w i n Alita Compton City Clerk Yes 2 3,335 6,526 51.1% Yes Zurita Satra Trustee, Governing Board, CUSD No 2 3,191 6,526 48.9% No
CITY COUNCIL 2 Full Galvan Isaac Businessman/Youth Pastor No 7 338 1,206 28.0% Runoff
Dobson Lillie Councilwoman/Businesswoman Yes 7 236 1,206 19.6% Runoff Blakely Anton Council Liaison/Assistant No 7 184 1,206 15.3% No Ivey Bill Benefits Auditor No 7 150 1,206 12.4% No Downs Rose M. Accounting Specialist No 7 115 1,206 9.5% No Carrillo Roberto Mechanical Engineer No 7 102 1,206 8.5% No Green-Geter Cynthia Business Owner No 7 81 1,206 6.7% No
CITY COUNCIL 3 Full Arceneaux Yvonne Councilmember, 3rd District Yes 5 1,204 2,180 55.2% Yes Sanchez Diana Business Administrator No 5 613 2,180 28.1% No Lightner Sandra Community Development Advocate No 5 199 2,180 9.1% No Ramirez Elizabeth Home Engineer No 5 113 2,180 5.2% No Reynaga Yosie Business Woman No 5 30 2,180 1.4% No
CITY TREASURER Full Sanders Douglas City Treasurer Yes 3 3,255 6,357 51.2% Yes Jackson Jasper "Jay" Paralegal No 3 1,594 6,357 25.1% No
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED
LOS ANGELES 4/16/2013 Compton CITY TREASURER Full Fisher Skyy D. Finance Chairman No 3 1,508 6,357 23.7% No (continued) MAYOR Full Brown Aja Community Devel. Consultant No 12 1,887 6,764 27.9% Runoff
Bradley Omar Author No 12 1,796 6,764 26.6% Runoff Perrodin Eric J. Mayor/Deputy D.A Yes 12 1,663 6,764 24.6% No Davis Charles Compton Comm. Coll. Brd. Mbr. No 12 428 6,764 6.3% No Kemp William T. Businessman No 12 301 6,764 4.5% No Rodgers-Boone Lynn Retired Redevelopment Technician No 12 195 6,764 2.9% No Deloath Jacquelyn Business Owner No 12 112 6,764 1.7% No Strickland Charles Historian/Director No 12 112 6,764 1.7% No Burton Jeremy Aerospace Engineer No 12 104 6,764 1.5% No Rippy Rodney Allen Businessman/Marketing Specialist No 12 87 6,764 1.3% No Duren B. Kwaku Attorney No 12 49 6,764 0.7% No Moore Calvin "Joe" RE Broker/Teacher No 12 30 6,764 0.4% No
5/14/2013 Redondo Beach CITY COUNCIL 1 Full Ginsburg Jeff Small Business Owner No 2 1,317 2,230 59.1% Yes Light Jim Engineer/Executive No 2 913 2,230 40.9% No
4 Full Sammarco Stephen "Steve" Small Business Owner No 2 727 1,332 54.6% Yes Jeffreys Jan City of Redondo Beach Commis. No 2 605 1,332 45.4% No
CITY TREASURER Short Diels Steven Chief Financial Officer No 3 3,230 8,225 39.3% Runoff
Esser Dawn Finance Professional No 3 3,109 8,225 37.8% Runoff Cagle Chris Businessman No 3 1,886 8,225 22.9% No
MAYOR Full Aspel Steve Small Business Owner No 2 4,381 8,613 50.9% Yes Kilroy Matt RBUSD Teacher/Councilmember No 2 4,232 8,613 49.1% No
5/21/2013 Los Angeles CITY ATTORNEY Full Feuer Mike Assembly Member/Attorney No 2 238,237 382,571 62.3% Yes Trutanich Carmen "Nuch" Los Angeles City Attorney Yes 2 144,334 382,571 37.7% No
CITY CONTROLLER Full Galperin Ron Efficiency Commis. /Businessman No 2 209,897 370,826 56.6% Yes Zine Dennis P. Los Angeles City Councilman No 2 160,929 370,826 43.4% No
CITY COUNCIL 1 Full Cedillo Gilbert California State Lawmaker No 2 10,152 19,541 52.0% Yes Gardea Jose A. Councilmember's Chief Deputy No 2 9,389 19,541 48.0% No
6 Full Montanez Cindy Businesswoman/Enviro. Advocate No 6 7,241 16,747 43.2% Runoff
Martinez Nury School Boardmember No 6 4,069 16,747 24.3% Runoff Waleko Derek Senior Government Advisor No 6 1,907 16,747 11.4% No Garcia J. Roy Community Activist/Businessman No 6 1,577 16,747 9.4% No Escobar Walter Alexander Student No 6 995 16,747 5.9% No Valdez Richard Businessman No 6 958 16,747 5.7% No
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 35 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 36
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED LOS ANGELES 5/21/2013 Los Angeles CITY COUNCIL 9 Full Price, Jr. Curren D. State Senator/Professor No 2 6,421 12,254 52.4% Yes (continued) Cubas Ana Councilmember's Chief Deputy No 2 5,833 12,254 47.6% No
13 Full O'Farrell Mitch Councilmember's Senior Advisor No 2 13,940 26,425 52.8% Yes Choi John J. Commis./Community Organizer No 2 12,485 26,425 47.2% No
MAYOR Full Garcetti Eric Los Angeles City Councilmember No 2 222,300 409,909 54.2% Yes Greuel Wendy J. Los Angeles City Controller No 2 187,609 409,909 45.8% No
6/4/2013 Compton CITY COUNCIL 2 Full Galvan Isaac Businessman/Youth Pastor No 2 767 1,225 62.6% Yes Dobson Lillie Councilwoman/Businesswoman Yes 2 458 1,225 37.4% No
MAYOR Full Brown Aja Community Devel. Consultant No 2 4,724 7,431 63.6% Yes Bradley Omar Author No 2 2,707 7,431 36.4% No
6/11/2013 Inglewood CITY COUNCIL 1 Full Dotson George Business Owner No 2 1,799 3,081 58.4% Yes Stevens Mike Councilman Yes 2 1,282 3,081 41.6% No
2 Full Padilla Alex Retired Police Captain No 2 1,524 2,233 68.2% Yes Dunlap Judy Councilwomen Yes 2 709 2,233 31.8% No
7/23/2013 Los Angeles CITY COUNCIL 6 Full Martinez Nury School Boardmember No 2 5,485 10,001 54.8% Yes Montanez Cindy Businesswoman/Enviro. Advocate No 2 4,516 10,001 45.2% No
Redondo Beach CITY TREASURER Full Diels Steven Chief Financial Officer No 2 5,339 9,522 56.1% Yes Esser Dawn Finance Professional No 2 4,183 9,522 43.9% No
11/5/2013 Agoura Hills CITY COUNCIL Full Weber Denis Councilmember/Banker Yes 5 1,445 5,848 24.7% Yes Schwarz Harry Councilmember/Businessman Yes 5 1,246 5,848 21.3% Yes Koehler William D. Councilmember/Attorney Yes 5 1,226 5,848 21.0% Yes Anstead Chris Oncology Marketing Executive No 5 1,051 5,848 18.0% No Platzer Meril S. Doctor of Medicine No 5 880 5,848 15.0% No
Artesia CITY COUNCIL Full Flowers Sally Artesia Council Mbr./Bus. Woman Yes 6 821 3,889 21.1% Yes Taj Ali S. Licensed Financial Advisor No 6 753 3,889 19.4% Yes Manalo Victor Council Mbr./University Professor Yes 6 734 3,889 18.9% Yes Lyon John P. Councilmember/Project Manager Yes 6 678 3,889 17.4% No Ramoso Melissa Deputy Senator Director No 6 541 3,889 13.9% No Patel Manu Insurance Broker No 6 362 3,889 9.3% No
Baldwin Park CITY CLERK Full Avila Alejandra City Clerk Yes 1 2,391 2,391 100.0% Yes Baca Cruz Education Specialist No 3 2,746 6,827 40.2% Yes Rubio Susan Teacher/Council Member Yes 3 2,647 6,827 38.8% Yes Ybarra Natalie M. Educator/Planning Commissioner No 3 1,434 6,827 21.0% No
CITY TREASURER Full Contreras Maria Antonieta "Marie" City Treasurer Yes 1 2,536 2,536 100.0% Yes
MAYOR Full Lozano Manuel Mayor Yes 1 2,882 2,882 100.0% Yes
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED LOS ANGELES 11/5/2013 Bell Gardens CITY COUNCIL Full Crespo Daniel Mayor/Probation Officer Yes 6 1,243 5,163 24.1% Yes (continued) Flores Priscilla Mayor Protem/Educator Yes 6 1,150 5,163 22.3% Yes Mendoza Jose J. Teacher/Planning Commissioner No 6 1,126 5,163 21.8% Yes Infanzon Sergio Councilmember Yes 6 822 5,163 15.9% No Saavedra Jazmina Businesswoman/Business Owner No 6 483 5,163 9.4% No Silva Yvette Pharmacy Mger./Businesswoman No 6 339 5,163 6.6% No
Diamond Bar CITY COUNCIL Full Tye Steve Diamond Bar Cou. Mbr. /Bus.man Yes 6 2,895 12,227 23.7% Yes Chang Ling Ling Diamond Bar Councilmbr./Educator Yes 6 2,765 12,227 22.6% Yes Lyons Nancy A. Teacher/Governing Boardmember No 6 2,578 12,227 21.1% Yes Everett Ron Councilmember/Personnel Commis. Yes 6 1,956 12,227 16.0% No Kim Joseph Businessman No 6 1,232 12,227 10.1% No Nakaishi Martin Businessman/Entrepreneur No 6 801 12,227 6.6% No
Duarte CITY COUNCIL Full Finlay Margaret E. Duarte City Councilmember Yes 8 1,541 7,463 20.6% Yes Kang Samuel Healthcare Manager/Businessman No 8 1,384 7,463 18.5% Yes Paras-Caracci Tzeitel Duarte City Councilmember Yes 8 1,271 7,463 17.0% Yes Reyes Phil Business Consultant No 8 1,150 7,463 15.4% No Lefmann Sheryl Consultant/Public Speaker No 8 919 7,463 12.3% No Baltazar, Jr. Henry Small Business Owner No 8 607 7,463 8.1% No F i e l d Allen A. Retired/Landlord No 8 329 7,463 4.4% No Zigic Nick Real Estate Broker No 8 262 7,463 3.5% No
El Monte CITY CLERK Full Hawes Jonathan Community Affairs Commissioner No 3 1,620 4,104 39.5% Yes Zamorano Irma Community Advocate No 3 1,318 4,104 32.1% No Aguilar Luis Small Business Owner No 3 1,166 4,104 28.4% No
El Monte CITY COUNCIL Full Macias Norma Councilmember/Businesswoman Yes 3 2,839 7,138 39.8% Yes Gomez Juventino "J" Councilman Yes 3 2,352 7,138 33.0% Yes Amezcua Frank Political Scientist/Educator No 3 1,947 7,138 27.3% No
CITY TREASURER Full Velasco Jerry Treasurer/Business Owner Yes 1 3,368 3,368 100.0% Yes
MAYOR Full Quintero Andre Mayor/Criminal Prosecutor Yes 2 2,967 4,543 65.3% Yes Barrios Art Retired Businessman No 2 1,576 4,543 34.7% No
Hawaiian Gardens CITY COUNCIL Full Rodriguez Reynaldo O. Incumbent Yes 8 402 1,961 20.5% Yes Bruce Barry Pastor/Council Member Yes 8 373 1,961 19.0% Yes Rios Mariana Elementary School Teacher No 8 257 1,961 13.1% Yes Oyama-Canada Michiko A. Incumbent Yes 8 226 1,961 11.5% No Avelar Adrian No Ballot Designation No 8 196 1,961 10.0% No An Phil No Ballot Designation No 8 180 1,961 9.2% No
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 37 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 38
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED LOS ANGELES 11/5/2013 Hawaiian Gardens CITY COUNCIL Full Kwan Priscilla Business Owner No 8 176 1,961 9.0% No (continued) Mason Valerie Property Manager No 8 151 1,961 7.7% No
Hawthorne CITY CLERK Full Huber N o r b City Clerk/Teacher Yes 2 2,599 3,777 68.8% Yes Anderson Shelby Vice-President, Security Company No 2 1,178 3,777 31.2% No
CITY COUNCIL Full Vargas Alex City Councilmember/Teacher Yes 7 2,000 7,470 26.8% Yes English Angie Reyes Councilmember, City of Hawthorne Yes 7 1,630 7,470 21.8% Yes Manning Katrina Realtor No 7 1,376 7,470 18.4% No Talleda Miguel "Mike" Business Owner No 7 889 7,470 11.9% No Jefferson John L. Retired Law Officer No 7 610 7,470 8.2% No Stiglich Frances Retired No 7 565 7,470 7.6% No Mego Gordon Michael Community Activist No 7 400 7,470 5.4% No
CITY TREASURER Full Patterson L. David Financial Advisor No 2 2,315 4,018 57.6% Yes Lubenec Thierry Incumbent Yes 2 1,703 4,018 42.4% No
MAYOR Full Brown Chris Small Business Owner No 3 1,695 4,281 39.6% Yes Juarez Daniel "Danny" Mayor Yes 3 1,324 4,281 30.9% No Gutierrez Jose Information Technologist No 3 1,262 4,281 29.5% No
Hermosa Beach CITY COUNCIL Full Barragan Nanette Business Advocate/Counselor No 7 2,138 12,523 17.1% Yes Petty Carolyn Finance/Operations Executive No 7 1,996 12,523 15.9% Yes Fangary H.S. Environmental Engineer/Lawyer No 7 1,992 12,523 15.9% Yes Duclos Jeff City Council Member Yes 7 1,985 12,523 15.9% No Bobko Patrick "Kit" Councilman/Municipal Attorney Yes 7 1,695 12,523 13.5% No Savelli Greg Chief of Enforcement No 7 1,430 12,523 11.4% No Bowler John Food Truck Consultant No 7 1,287 12,523 10.3% No
CITY TREASURER Short Nowicki Karen S. CPA/Business Owner No 2 2,578 4,053 63.6% Yes Reviczky J.R. Retired Manager No 2 1,475 4,053 36.4% No
Lomita CITY COUNCIL Full Gazeley James R. "Jim Incumbent Yes 6 1,010 5,353 18.9% Yes Traina Ben Councilmember Yes 6 976 5,353 18.2% Yes Waronek Mark A. Businessman No 6 896 5,353 16.7% Yes Thompson James Attorney/Business Owner No 6 848 5,353 15.8% No
Lomita CITY COUNCIL Full Segawa Cynthia School Administrative Assistant No 6 844 5,353 15.8% No Albert Dave Business Executive No 6 779 5,353 14.6% No
Lynwood CITY COUNCIL Full Solache Jose Luis Gov. Board Mbr., Lynwood USD No 9 1,413 7,350 19.2% Yes Hernandez Edwin City Treasurer No 9 1,218 7,350 16.6% Yes Santillan-Beas Maria T. Council Member/Director Yes 9 1,117 7,350 15.2% Yes Aguilar Domitila "Tila" Teacher No 9 1,050 7,350 14.3% No
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED LOS ANGELES 11/5/2013 Lynwood CITY COUNCIL Full Morton Jim Council Member Yes 9 978 7,350 13.3% No (continued) Pygatt Iris Businesswoman No 9 764 7,350 10.4% No Armstrong Terri Student Services Professional No 9 342 7,350 4.7% No Briggs-Hancock Lynder Joyce Mother No 9 306 7,350 4.2% No Martinez, Jr. Arthur Comissioner No 9 162 7,350 2.2% No
Maywood CITY COUNCIL Full Villarreal Ricardo Business Man No 6 676 3,669 18.4% Yes Martin Thomas Maywood Councilmember Yes 6 665 3,669 18.1% Yes De La Riva Eduardo "Eddie" UCLA Youth Coordinator No 6 656 3,669 17.9% Yes Aguirre Felipe Maywood Councilmember Yes 6 601 3,669 16.4% No Ververa Ismal Police Sergeant No 6 541 3,669 14.7% No Varela Ed Councilmbr./Hearing Representative Yes 6 530 3,669 14.4% No
Montebello CITY COUNCIL Full R o m e r o Vivian Businesswoman/Commissioner No 7 2,273 10,682 21.3% Yes Barajas Art Businessowner/City Councilman Yes 7 2,172 10,682 20.3% Yes Molinari William M. "Bill" Councilmember/Business Owner Yes 7 1,818 10,682 17.0% Yes Gallarzo Flavio Teacher/School Administrator No 7 1,493 10,682 14.0% No Hernandez Daniel Quality Control Supervisor No 7 1,283 10,682 12.0% No Delgado Emma Operations Manager No 7 967 10,682 9.1% No Arriola Anna Retired Financial Technician No 7 676 10,682 6.3% No
Palmdale CITY COUNCIL Full Lackey Tom Highway Patrol Sergeant Yes 4 5,735 15,245 37.6% Yes Thompson Fred Director AVC Foundation No 4 4,360 15,245 28.6% Yes Loa Richard Jesse Consumer Attorney No 4 3,881 15,245 25.5% No Duplechan Sir Minister No 4 1,269 15,245 8.3% No
MAYOR Full Ledford James C. Mayor of Palmdale Yes 4 5,935 9,396 63.2% Yes Minidis Lynn M. Business Owner/Entrepreneur No 4 2,052 9,396 21.8% No Campbell Maggie Professor No 4 1,256 9,396 13.4% No Toles Mitcheal Legal Shield Recruiter No 4 153 9,396 1.6% No
Pico Rivera CITY COUNCIL Full Camacho Gustavo City Council Member Yes 3 2,703 5,956 45.4% Yes Armenta David W. City Council Member Yes 3 1,863 5,956 31.3% Yes Diaz Adrian L. Water Board Member No 3 1,390 5,956 23.3% No
Rancho Palos Verdes CITY COUNCIL Full Misetich Anthony Businessman/City Councilman Yes 3 2,885 7,993 36.1% Yes Campbell Brian Business Owner/Councilmember Yes 3 2,755 7,993 34.5% Yes Dyda Ken Retired No 3 2,353 7,993 29.4% No
Rolling Hills Estates CITY COUNCIL Full Huff Britt Planning Commissioner No 4 673 1,905 35.3% Yes Zuckerman Steve Incumbent Yes 4 578 1,905 30.3% Yes Spydell Cat Small Businessowner/Author No 4 420 1,905 22.0% No
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 39 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 40
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED LOS ANGELES 11/5/2013 Rolling Hills Estates CITY COUNCIL Full Davis Clark Government Relations Consultant No 4 234 1,905 12.3% No (continued) Santa Fee Springs CITY COUNCIL Full Moore Richard Jaramillo Appointed Incumbent No 7 1,050 5,026 20.9% Yes Sarno John "Jay" Santa Fe Springs Business Owner No 7 1,044 5,026 20.8% Yes Trujillo Juanita Ann Incumbent Yes 7 1,032 5,026 20.5% Yes Gonzalez Louie Councilmember., Santa Fe Springs Yes 7 954 5,026 19.0% No Rodriguez Annette Human Resources Manager No 7 626 5,026 12.5% No Garcia, Jr. William Student No 7 168 5,026 3.3% No Givens Michael A. No Ballot Designation No 7 152 5,026 3.0% No
South El Monte CITY COUNCIL Full Garcia Angelica R. Councilwoman/Educator Yes 4 683 2,194 31.1% Yes Gonzalez Joseph J. City Councilman Yes 4 669 2,194 30.5% Yes Barrera Leo Customer Service Manager No 4 458 2,194 20.9% No Acosta Manuel "Manny" Pharmaceutical Manager No 4 384 2,194 17.5% No
South Pasadena CITY CLERK Full Zneimer Evelyn G. Attorney No 1 2,173 2,173 100.0% Yes
CITY COUNCIL Full Cacciotti Michael A. State Prosecutor/Councilmember Yes 4 2,516 6,708 37.5% Yes Mahmud Diana City Commissioner/Attorney No 4 1,893 6,708 28.2% Yes Putnam Philip C. Incumbent Yes 4 1,673 6,708 24.9% No Reynolds Alan Commis./Engineer/Businessman No 4 626 6,708 9.3% No
CITY TREASURER Full Pia Gary Incumbent Yes 1 2,206 2,206 100.0% Yes
West Covina CITY CLERK Full Lewis Nick City Commissioner No 3 2,568 6,263 41.0% Yes Redholtz H e r b Businessman No 3 1,875 6,263 29.9% No Astorga Esmeralda Field Interviewer No 3 1,820 6,263 29.1% No
CITY COUNCIL Full Toma James Deputy Attorney General No 9 3,833 19,602 19.6% Yes Warshaw Corey Retired Business Analyst No 9 2,696 19,602 13.8% Yes Spence Mike Gov. Bd. Mbr. West Covina USD No 9 2,385 19,602 12.2% Yes Johnson Lloyd A. Veteran No 9 2,383 19,602 12.2% No Caceres Kimberly Governmental Affairs Director No 9 2,109 19,602 10.8% No Armbrust Karin Business Woman No 9 1,863 19,602 9.5% No McIntyre Andrew "Andy" Appt. Councilmember/Businessman No 9 1,852 19,602 9.4% No
West Covina CITY COUNCIL Full Sotelo Rob Appt. West Covina City Councilmbr. No 9 1,580 19,602 8.1% No D'Avila Armando Probation Supervisor/Educator No 9 901 19,602 4.6% No
CITY TREASURER Full Rozatti Colleen B. Retired Banker/Educator No 2 3,808 6,534 58.3% Yes Smithson Marian Incumbent Yes 2 2,726 6,534 41.7% No
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED LOS ANGELES 11/5/2013 West Lake Village CITY COUNCIL Full Rutherford Mark Incumbent Yes 5 847 3,565 23.8% Yes (continued) Halpern Brad CEO/President No 5 830 3,565 23.3% Yes McSweeney Susan Incumbent Yes 5 817 3,565 22.9% Yes Horner Kymberly "Kym" Redevelopment Service Manager No 5 558 3,565 15.7% No Rosenberg Don Entertainment Consultant No 5 513 3,565 14.4% No
MADERA No City Contests
MARIN 11/5/2013 Corte Madera CITY COUNCIL Full Furst Diane Incumbent Yes 4 1,665 5,709 29.2% Yes Stone Condon Carla Incumbent Yes 4 1,604 5,709 28.1% Yes Lappert Michael Incumbent Yes 4 1,300 5,709 22.8% Yes Kunhardt David W. Solar Energy Executive No 4 1,112 5,709 19.5% No
Fairfax CITY COUNCIL Full Coler Barbara Councilmember/Scientist Yes 4 1,449 4,753 30.5% Yes Weinsoff David Councilmbr./Environmental Attorney Yes 4 1,446 4,753 30.4% Yes Reed John Incumbent Yes 4 1,425 4,753 30.0% Yes Lang Christopher Landscape Gardner/Bicyclist No 4 417 4,753 8.8% No
Short Goddard Renee Appointed Incumbent No 1 1,390 1,411 98.5% Yes
Larkspur CITY COUNCIL Full Way Catherine Community Volunteer No 4 2,149 7,306 29.4% Yes Hillmer Daniel City Councilmember/Consultant Yes 4 1,967 7,306 26.9% Yes Haroff Kevin Attorney No 4 1,611 7,306 22.1% Yes Kunstler Daniel Writer No 4 1,564 7,306 21.4% No
Mill Valley CITY COUNCIL Full McCauley John Business School Professor No 4 2,307 6,138 37.6% Yes Jackson Jessica Attorney/Mother No 4 1,989 6,138 32.4% Yes Kelly Dan Attorney No 4 1,174 6,138 19.1% No Gordon George Local Businessman No 4 659 6,138 10.7% No
Novato CITY COUNCIL Full Eklund Pat Councilmbr./Environmental Mgr. Yes 4 5,843 16,064 36.4% Yes Athas Denise Incumbent Yes 4 4,642 16,064 28.9% Yes Jordan Steven Local Businessman No 4 3,707 16,064 23.1% No Sluis Eleanor Retired No 4 1,831 16,064 11.4% No
San Anselmo CITY COUNCIL Full Coleman Kay Incumbent Yes 3 2,100 5,947 35.3% Yes McInerney Tom Incumbent Yes 3 1,976 5,947 33.2% Yes Wright John D. Attorney No 3 1,817 5,947 30.6% Yes
Short Kelly Doug Business Owner No 3 1,140 2,937 38.8% Yes Burdo Stephen Public Affairs Director No 3 911 2,937 31.0% No Brown Matt Commercial Property Broker No 3 879 2,937 29.9% No
San Rafeal CITY COUNCIL Full Colin K a t e Appointed Incumbent No 4 6,595 19,100 34.5% Yes Bushey Lang Maribeth Administrative Law Judge No 4 4,688 19,100 24.5% Yes
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 41 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 42
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED MARIN 11/5/2013 San Rafeal CITY COUNCIL Full Brockbank Greg Attorney/Business Owner No 4 4,458 19,100 23.3% No (continued) Warren Randy Attorney/Businessman No 4 3,310 19,100 17.3% No
MARIPOSA No City Contests
MENDOCINO 5/7/2013 Fort Bragg CITY COUNCIL Full Kraut Heidi Manager No 3 603 1,195 50.5% Yes M e l o Madeline Retired No 3 463 1,195 38.7% No Hoyle Derek Planning Commissioner No 3 123 1,195 10.3% No
MERCED 11/5/2013 Merced CITY COUNCIL Full Pedrozo Josh Teacher/Councilmember Yes 8 4,013 18,085 22.2% Yes Blake Kevin Merced Sheriff's Sergent Yes 8 3,371 18,085 18.6% Yes Belluomini Michael City/School Planner No 8 2,865 18,085 15.8% Yes Mowrer Jana Home Healthcare Manager No 8 2,466 18,085 13.6% No Ramirez Chris Educator No 8 1,896 18,085 10.5% No Padilla Peter Businessman No 8 1,748 18,085 9.7% No Gallardo, Jr Alex Educator/Coach No 8 854 18,085 4.7% No Villa Monica Kay Homemaker No 8 807 18,085 4.5% No
MAYOR Full Thurston Stanley P. Incumbent Yes 2 3,797 7,260 52.3% Yes Lor Noah Mayor Pro Tempore No 2 3,412 7,260 47.0% No
MODOC No City Contests
MONO No City Contests
MONTEREY No City Contests
NAPA No City Contests
NEVADA No City Contests
ORANGE No City Contests
PLACER No City Contests
PLUMAS No City Contests
RIVERSIDE 6/4/2013 Riverside CITY COUNCIL 2 Full Melendrez Andy Councilmember/Businessman Yes 1 2,894 2,894 100.0% Yes
3 Short Soubirous Mike Retired Highway Patrolman No 5 2,533 5,494 46.1% Runoff
Hill Valerie Retired Undersheriff No 5 1,801 5,494 32.8% Runoff Funderburk Henry Director Non Profit No 5 607 5,494 11.0% No Hernandez Ron "Rosco" Retired Peace Officer No 5 393 5,494 7.2% No Burden Clarice Urban Planner No 5 160 5,494 2.9% No
4 Full Davis Paul Councilmember/Small Businessman Yes 1 3,362 3,362 100.0% Yes
6 Full Perry Jim Retired Police Lieutenant No 6 1,694 2,786 60.8% Yes Andrews Scott Nonprofit Project Manager No 6 373 2,786 13.4% No Chavez Aurora Community Volunteer No 6 342 2,786 12.3% No
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED RIVERSIDE 6/4/2013 Riverside CITY COUNCIL 6 Full Allen Larry E. General Building Contractor No 6 288 2,786 10.3% No (continued) Santore Art Retired No 6 68 2,786 2.4% No Mahatadse Chuck Painter No 6 21 2,786 0.8% No
11/5/2013 Blythe CITY CLERK Full Sutterfield Mallory Krista Incumbent Yes 1 962 962 100.0% Yes Wade Timothy "Tim" Retried Police Captain No 6 643 3,151 20.4% Yes De-Coninck Joseph "Joey" Farmer/Businessman Yes 6 601 3,151 19.1% Yes Galvan Oscar Incumbent Yes 6 567 3,151 18.0% Yes Patel Sam Incumbent Yes 6 529 3,151 16.8% No Reynolds Dale S. Administrative Supervisor No 6 406 3,151 12.9% No Jones Sharon "Sheri" College Administrator No 6 405 3,151 12.9% No
CITY TREASURER Full Elms Christa Appointed Incumbent No 1 936 936 100.0% Yes
Desert Hot Springs CITY COUNCIL Full McKee Joe Retired Corporate Manager No 4 1,351 4,165 32.4% Yes Matas Scott City Council Member Yes 4 1,132 4,165 27.2% Yes Pye Jan Incumbent Yes 4 1,003 4,165 24.1% No Bentley Robert Author/Journalist/Reverend No 4 679 4,165 16.3% No
MAYOR Full Sanchez Adam Councilmember/Executive Director No 3 1,042 2,412 43.2% Yes Parks Yvonne Incumbent Yes 3 1,030 2,412 42.7% No Valdez John-Paul Economist/Financial Consultant No 3 340 2,412 14.1% No
Norco CITY COUNCIL Full Bash Kevin Incumbent Yes 5 1,884 4,692 40.2% Yes Newton Greg Construction Project Manager No 5 1,417 4,692 30.2% Yes Bowen Greg A. Construction Superintendent No 5 753 4,692 16.0% No Daniels Katarina "Trina" Businesswoman No 5 511 4,692 10.9% No Mc Arron Stephen J. Human Resources Manager No 5 127 4,692 2.7% No
Palm Springs CITY COUNCIL Full Float Ginny Palm Springs City Council Member Yes 4 5,268 15,572 33.8% Yes Mills Christopher "Chris" Councilmembr./Architect/Bussman Yes 4 5,207 15,572 33.4% Yes Deertrack Judy Evans Land Use Consultant No 4 3,181 15,572 20.4% No Nichols Jeffrey Nonprofit Director/Businessman No 4 1,916 15,572 12.3% No
Riverside CITY COUNCIL 3 Short Soubirous Mike Retired Highway Patrolman No 2 2,765 5,148 53.7% Yes Hill Valerie Retired Undersheriff No 2 2,383 5,148 46.3% No
SACRAMENTO No City Contests
SAN BENITO No City Contests
SAN BERNARDINO 3/5/2013 Chino Hills CITY COUNCIL Short Marquez Ray Retired Firefighter No 4 3,830 8,444 45.4% Yes Mitchell Rossana Businesswoman/Attorney No 4 2,741 8,444 32.5% No Hernandez Debra Businesswoman No 4 972 8,444 11.5% No Singh Jesse Businessperson/Attorney No 4 901 8,444 10.7% No
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 43 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 44
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED SAN BERNARDINO 3/5/2013 Yucca Valley CITY COUNCIL Full Leone Robert "Bob" Retired Law Enforcement No 4 1,425 3,061 46.6% Yes (continued) Collins Jennifer Local Insurance Executive No 4 917 3,061 30.0% No Hildebrand Michael Local Business Owner No 4 621 3,061 20.3% No Short Claude Teacher No 4 98 3,061 3.2% No
11/5/2013 San Bernardino CITY ATTORNEYR 2 Short Saenz Gary D. Attorney at Law No 2 5,771 10,306 56.0% Yes Prince Tim Attorney/Business Owner No 2 4,535 10,306 44.0% No
CITY COUNCIL 1 Full Marquez Virginia Incumbent Yes 3 625 1,110 56.3% Yes Dailey Casey Transportation Analyst No 3 248 1,110 22.3% No Abad John J. Retired Teacher No 3 237 1,110 21.4% No
2 Full Barrios Benito J. Small Business Owner No 2 635 1,136 55.9% Yes Jenkins Robert Teacher/Council Member Yes 2 501 1,136 44.1% No
4 Full Shorett Fred Businessman/Council Member Yes 3 1,529 3,171 48.2% Yes Jones Anthony Business Owner No 3 985 3,171 31.1% No Pinegar Kathy Property Manager No 3 657 3,171 20.7% No
CITY COUNCILR 1 Short Mulvihill Jim Retired Professor/Businessman No 5 875 2,119 41.3% Yes Thomas Michael "Mike" Corporate Manager No 5 468 2,119 22.1% No Sanborn Paul W. Fire Sprinkler Contractor No 5 329 2,119 15.5% No Gonzalez Nick Retired Mayor's Assistant No 5 285 2,119 13.4% No Williamson Joshua D. Business Owner/Parent No 5 162 2,119 7.6% No
3 Short Williams Roxanne Teacher/Educator No 1 577 577 100.0% Yes
MAYOR Full McCammack Wendy J. Taxpayer Adviser/Businesswoman No 10 3,091 12,959 23.9% Yes Davis Carey Corporate Controller/CPA No 10 3,023 12,959 23.3% No Avila Rick General Engineering Contractor No 10 1,493 12,959 11.5% No Johnson Rikke Van Councilman/Small Businessman No 10 1,410 12,959 10.9% No Nickel H.W. Financial Analyst No 10 1,059 12,959 8.2% No Castro Richard T. Retired Teacher/Coach No 10 880 12,959 6.8% No Crawford Draymond "Dray" San Bernardino Graffiti Removal No 10 741 12,959 5.7% No Kelley Chas A. Fifth Ward Councilman No 10 587 12,959 4.5% No Korner Matt Start-up Founder No 10 291 12,959 2.2% No Roe Karmel Real Estate Broker No 10 288 12,959 2.2% No
SAN DIEGO 3/26/2013 San Diego CITY COUNCIL 4 Short C o l e Myrtle Senior Care Advocate No 9 4,304 13,319 32.3% Yes Crenshaw Dwayne Community Nonprofit Dir./Educator No 9 2,025 13,319 15.2% Yes Pollard Brian "Barry" Businessman No 9 1,548 13,319 11.6% No Smith Ray Pastor/Developer No 9 1,207 13,319 9.1% No Lopez Brown Blanca Teacher/Businesswoman No 9 1,084 13,319 8.1% No
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED SAN DIEGO 3/26/2013 San Diego CITY COUNCIL 4 Short Spackman Sandy Administrative Coordinator/Educator No 9 1,067 13,319 8.0% No (continued) Williams Bruce Senior Community Policy Advisor No 9 1,059 13,319 8.0% No Villafranca Tony Business Owner No 9 621 13,319 4.7% No Montgomery Monica Attorney No 9 404 13,319 3.0% No
5/21/2013 San Diego CITY COUNCIL 4 Short C o l e Myrtle Senior Care Advocate No 2 6,612 12,215 54.1% Yes Crenshaw Dwayne Community Nonprofit Dir./Educator No 2 5,603 12,215 45.9% No
11/19/2013 MAYOR Full Faulconer Kevin Councilmbr./Audit Comm. Chairman No 11 101,953 241,777 42.2% Runoff
Alvarez David San Diego City Councilmember No 11 65,740 241,777 27.2% Runoff Fletcher Nathan Educator/Businessman No 11 58,355 241,777 24.1% No Aguirre Michael J. No Ballot Designation No 11 10,783 241,777 4.5% No Pickard Lincoln Retired Contractor No 11 1,144 241,777 0.5% No Coons Bruce Executive Dir., Nonprofit Org. No 11 1,012 241,777 0.4% No Moghadam Sina “Simon” Bussman/Restaurateur/Engineer No 11 748 241,777 0.3% No Collins Hud Attorney No 11 647 241,777 0.3% No Kemmer Michael A. Student/Frat. Leadership Chairman No 11 612 241,777 0.3% No Dirks Harry Business Admstr./Builder/Realtor No 11 434 241,777 0.2% No Pettus Tobiah L. Business/Construction/Supt. No 11 344 241,777 0.1% No
SAN FRANCISCO County and City contests included in the County report
SAN JOAQUIN No City Contests
SAN LUIS OBISPO No City Contests
SAN MATEO 11/5/2013 Atherton CITY COUNCIL Full Degolia Rick Business Consultant No 3 1,178 1,893 62.2% Yes Conlon Greg Businessman CPA No 3 393 1,893 20.8% No Beymer-Sandhu Diane Chief Executive Officer No 3 322 1,893 17.0% No
Belmont CITY COUNCIL Full Reed Eric Father/Biotechnology Director No 6 2,983 13,940 21.4% Yes Stone Charles Father/Business Owner No 6 2,745 13,940 19.7% Yes Lieberman Warren Incumbent Yes 6 2,632 13,940 18.9% Yes Mercer Kristin Belmont Planning Commissioner No 6 2,292 13,940 16.4% No d'Souza Gladwyn Engineer/Nonprofit Director No 6 1,909 13,940 13.7% No Verdone Mike C. Businessman/Consultant No 6 1,379 13,940 9.9% No
Brisbane CITY COUNCIL Full Liu Lori S. Mother/Attorney No 4 879 2,651 33.2% Yes Conway W. Clarke Incumbent Yes 4 790 2,651 29.8% Yes Lentz Cliff Incumbent Yes 4 684 2,651 25.8% Yes Escolar Gavin Kelly Jewelry Designer/Artist No 4 298 2,651 11.2% No
Burlingame CITY COUNCIL Full Keighran Ann Incumbent Yes 9 3,028 13,219 22.9% Yes Brownrigg Michael Incumbent Yes 9 2,701 13,219 20.4% Yes
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 45 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 46
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED SAN MATEO 11/5/2013 Burlingame CITY COUNCIL Full Ortiz Ricardo Businessman No 9 2,054 13,219 15.5% Yes (continued) Cohen Russ Association Executive Director No 9 2,045 13,219 15.5% No Bandrapalli N i r m a l a Mother and Entrepreneur No 9 1,512 13,219 11.4% No Peceimer Andrew Business Owner No 9 891 13,219 6.7% No Duncan Steve Retail Management No 9 392 13,219 3.0% No Kent Alexander England School Real Estate No 9 319 13,219 2.4% No Schinagl Robert Store Clerk No 9 13,219 2.1% No
Foster City CITY COUNCIL Full Bronitsky Charlie Incumbent Yes 2 2,916 5,590 52.2% Yes Pollard Gary Business Owner No 2 2,674 5,590 47.8% Yes
Millbrae CITY COUNCIL Full Oliva Anne Appointed Incumbent No 4 1,849 6,137 30.1% Yes Holober Reuben D. Biotech Industry Employee No 4 1,838 6,137 29.9% Yes Schneider Ann Environmental Manager/Educator No 4 1,563 6,137 25.5% No Radtke Douglas Accountant/Auditor No 4 887 6,137 14.5% No
Portola Valley CITY COUNCIL Full Richards F. John Architect Yes 4 882 3,136 28.1% Yes Moise Derwin Maryann Incumbent Yes 4 875 3,136 27.9% Yes Hughes Craig R. Entrepreneur/Executive No 4 857 3,136 27.3% Yes Eisberg Bud Retired Airline Pilot No 4 522 3,136 16.6% No
Redwood City CITY COUNCIL Full Gee Jeff City Councilmember/Architect Yes 6 4,865 19,941 24.4% Yes Howard Diane Nurse No 6 4,403 19,941 22.1% Yes Seybert John D. City Council Member Yes 6 3,730 19,941 18.7% Yes Rankin Corrin Business Owner No 6 2,560 19,941 12.8% No Han James "Lee" Business Manager No 6 2,259 19,941 11.3% No Schmidt Ernie Businessman No 6 2,124 19,941 10.7% No
San Bruno CITY CLERK Full Bonner Carol City Clerk Yes 1 3,796 3,796 100.0% Yes
CITY COUNCIL Full Medina Rico E. Councilmember Yes 4 2,526 7,758 32.6% Yes Ibarra Ken Councilmember/Architect Yes 4 2,239 7,758 28.9% Yes Medina Marty Construction Inspector No 4 1,764 7,758 22.7% No Mason Andrew T. Project Manager No 4 1,229 7,758 15.8% No
CITY TREASURER Full Marty John Treasurer Yes 1 3,690 3,690 100.0% Yes
MAYOR Short Ruane Jim Mayor Yes 1 3,784 3,784 100.0% Yes
San Carlos CITY COUNCIL Full Grassilli Bob Incumbent Yes 6 3,312 13,042 25.4% Yes Johnson Cameron Technology Executive No 6 3,179 13,042 24.4% Yes Grocott Matt Incumbent Yes 6 2,709 13,042 20.8% Yes Clapper Karen Appointed Incumbent No 6 2,130 13,042 16.3% No Doherty Inge Tiegel Management Consultant No 6 1,040 13,042 8.0% No
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED SAN MATEO 11/5/2013 San Carlos CITY COUNCIL Full Corral Michael Sales Professional No 6 672 13,042 5.2% No
(continued) San Mateo CITY COUNCIL Full Lim David G. Incumbent Yes 5 7,675 27,718 27.7% Yes Goethals Joe Deputy District Attorney No 5 6,486 27,718 23.4% Yes Ross Robert Incumbent Yes 5 6,485 27,718 23.4% Yes Hugg Joshua Nonprofit Program Manager No 5 3,665 27,718 13.2% No Schmidt Karen E. Marketing Operations Executive No 5 3,407 27,718 12.3% No
South San Francisco CITY CLERK Full Martinelli Krista Joy Incumbent Yes 1 5,238 5,238 100.0% Yes
CITY COUNCIL Full Addiego Mark Incumbent Yes 8 3,143 15,496 20.3% Yes Normandy Liza L. Trustee, Sout S.F. School Dist. No 8 2,715 15,496 17.5% Yes Gupta Pradeep Appointed Councilmember No 8 2,426 15,496 15.7% Yes Goodman Maurice Duprá SSF USD Board Member No 8 1,910 15,496 12.3% No Ochsenhirt Rick Businessperson No 8 1,674 15,496 10.8% No Prouty John Harry Small Businessman No 8 1,573 15,496 10.2% No Mackay K a t e Mother/Student No 8 1,200 15,496 7.7% No Lock William "Bill" Community Volunteer No 8 855 15,496 5.5% No
Short Matsumoto Karyl Elected Councilmember Yes 3 3,348 5,676 59.0% Yes Martin Carlos Attorney/Business Development No 3 1,518 5,676 26.7% No Post Collin K. Father No 3 810 5,676 14.3% No
CITY TREASURER Full Risso Frank Appointed Incumbent No 1 5,260 5,260 100.0% Yes
Woodside CITY COUNCIL 2 Full Cody Gordon Deborah Engineer/Executive Director Yes 1 650 650 100.0% Yes
4 Full Tanner David Incumbent Yes 1 640 640 100.0% Yes
6 Full Kasten Anne M. Incumbent Yes 1 632 632 100.0% Yes
SANTA BARBARA No City Contests
SANTA CLARA 11/5/2013 Sunnyvale CITY COUNCIL 1 Full Larsson Gustav Software Engineer No 2 9,205 17,511 52.6% Yes Frazer Andy Software Engineer No 2 8,306 17,511 47.4% No
2 Full Hendricks Glenn Senior Engineering Manager No 3 10,181 17,628 57.8% Yes Hoffman Steve Chief Executive Officer No 3 6,406 17,628 36.3% No Magana Gustavo Law School Student No 3 1,041 17,628 5.9% No
SANTA CLARA 11/5/2013 Sunnyvale CITY COUNCIL 3 Full Griffith James R. "Jim" Engineer/Sunnyvale Councilmember Yes 2 11,410 17,617 64.8% Yes Merrick Tappan "Tap" G. Investment Adviser Representative No 2 6,207 17,617 35.2% No
SANTA CRUZ No City Contests
SHASTA No City Contests
SIERRA No City Contests
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 47 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 48
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED SISKIYOU 11/5/2013 Dunsmuir CITY COUNCIL Short Welch Scott Paralegal No 4 238 653 36.4% Yes Padula Timothy Railroad Bridge Welder No 4 235 653 36.0% Yes Gnesa Linda M. "Scooby" Retired Military Paramedic No 4 109 653 16.7% No Juarez Mark Entrepreneur/Inventor No 4 47 653 7.2% No
SOLANO 11/5/2013 Vallejo CITY COUNCIL Full Malgapo Jess Councilmember/Retired Navy Yes 8 7,266 35,876 20.3% Yes Miessner Katy Finance Manager No 8 6,458 35,876 18.0% Yes Dew Pippin Businesswoman/Realtor/Parent No 8 6,219 35,876 17.3% Yes Summers Anthony "Tony" Employer Recruiter/Pastor No 8 5,253 35,876 14.6% No Meitzenheimer Liat F. GVRD Boardmember No 8 4,144 35,876 11.6% No Platzer Chris Licensed Deck Officer No 8 3,216 35,876 9.0% No Blackwell Herman Woody Retired Employment Consultant No 8 1,714 35,876 4.8% No Mapalo Tony Security Officer No 8 1,444 35,876 4.0% No
Short Verder-A l i g a Rozzana Senior Program Manager No 3 6,353 13,610 46.7% Yes Schivley Joanne Retired Businesswoman/Banker No 3 5,024 13,610 36.9% No Johnson, Jr. Ronald J. Businessman/Bodyguard No 3 2,168 13,610 15.9% No
SONOMA No City Contests
STANISLAUS 11/5/2013 Ceres CITY COUNCIL Full Ryno Linda Retired Administrative Secretary No 3 1,573 4,234 37.2% Yes Lane Ken Incumbent Yes 3 1,357 4,234 32.1% Yes Molina Hugo Planning Commis. /Businessman No 3 1,286 4,234 30.4% No
Modesto CITY COUNCIL 2 Full Madrigal Tony Substitute Teacher No 3 804 1,465 54.9% Yes Rodriguez Jon No Designation No 3 462 1,465 31.5% No Telles Juan Farmer No 3 190 1,465 13.0% No
4 Full Zoslocki Bill Businessman No 4 2,349 4,146 56.7% Yes McGill Rickey Education Administrator No 4 1,147 4,146 27.7% No Melgoza Juan Businessman No 4 368 4,146 8.9% No Schambers Ryan Security Guard No 4 264 4,146 6.4% No
5 Full Ketchum Kenoyer Jenny Registered Nurse No 2 2,580 5,034 51.3% Yes Burnside Stephanie Councilwoman/Business Owner Yes 2 2,442 5,034 48.5% No
Waterford CITY COUNCIL Short Whitfield Joshua Public Relations Consultant No 2 641 919 69.7% Yes Self Keith Retired Railroad Worker No 2 266 919 28.9% No
SUTTER No City Contests
TEHAMA No City Contests
TRINITY No City Contests
TULARE 11/5/2013 Visalia CITY COUNCIL Full Gubler Warren Incumbent Yes 5 6,727 24,996 26.9% Yes Nelsen Steven A. Incumbent Yes 5 5,988 24,996 24.0% Yes
TABLE 2.1 VOTE TOTALS FOR CITY OFFICE CANDIDATES BY COUNTY AND ELECTION DATE, 2013 INC- NUMBER VOTES TOTAL DISTRICT/ TERM OF CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S CANDIDATE'S UMB- OF CAN- FOR CAN- VOTES PERCENT ELE- COUNTY Date CITY OFFICE SEAT OFFICE LAST NAME FIRST NAME BALLOT DESIGNATION ENT DIDATES DIDATES CAST1 OF VOTE CTED TULARE 11/5/2013 Visalia CITY COUNCIL Full Collins Gregory F. Incumbent Yes 5 5,985 24,996 23.9% Yes (continued) Salinas Vincent B. Business Consultant No 5 3,632 24,996 14.5% No Brown Michael Lawyer/Energy Advisor No 5 2,565 24,996 10.3% No
TUOLUMNE No City Contests
VENTURA 6/4/2013 Oxnard CITY COUNCIL Short Perello Bert United States Postal Worker No 13 2,483 9,576 25.9% Yes Olivares Jo Ann Director Human Resources No 13 1,619 9,576 16.9% No Rydberg Susan K. Special Education Teacher No 13 764 9,576 8.0% No Thibeault Donald W. Retired Lieutenant-Colonel No 13 691 9,576 7.2% No Quintana Mario R. Program Manager No 13 689 9,576 7.2% No Behrens Vincent Businessman No 13 554 9,576 5.8% No Vazquez Manuel Academic Program Director No 13 526 9,576 5.5% No Wolfel Elizabeth E. Marketing Director No 13 501 9,576 5.2% No Jones Martin Business Owner No 13 447 9,576 4.7% No Dozier Orlando Navy Budget Analyst No 13 430 9,576 4.5% No Valenzuela, Jr. Arthur "AJ" College Student Trustee No 13 385 9,576 4.0% No Madrigal Oscar Educator No 13 226 9,576 2.4% No Ronan Paul M. Retired Recreation Coordinator No 13 221 9,576 2.3% No
11/5/2013 San Buenaventura CITY COUNCIL Full Nasarenko Erik Deputy District Attorney No 9 10,110 55,762 18.1% Yes Tracy Mike City Councilmember Yes 9 7,735 55,762 13.9% Yes Andrews Neal Ventura City Councilmember Yes 9 7,629 55,762 13.7% Yes Monahan Jim Businessman/City Councilmember Yes 9 6,942 55,762 12.4% Yes Francis Richard Consumer Attorney No 9 6,901 55,762 12.4% No Brown Lorrie Community Development Intern No 9 6,889 55,762 12.4% No Rencher Brian Lee Businessman No 9 4,091 55,762 7.3% No Meehan Paul D. Senior Programmer Analyst No 9 4,001 55,762 7.2% No Swaffar David Kristian Artist/Music Promoter No 9 1,362 55,762 2.4% No
YOLO No City Contests
YUBA No City Contests
2013 CITY OFFICES AND BALLOT MEASURES───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 49 CALIFORNIA ELECTION OUTCOMES ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PAGE 50
TABLE 2.2 SUMMARY OF ELECTION OUTCOMES FOR CITY OFFICES, 2013 City Attorney City Clerk City Controller City Council City Treasurer Mayor Total* Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Percent N Win 75.0 3 100.0 9 0.0 0 81.7 138 80.0 12 78.6 11 82.0 173 Incumbent Lose 25.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 18.3 31 20.0 3 21.4 3 18.0 38 Candidates Total 100.0 4 100.0 9 0.0 0 100.0 169 100.0 15 100.0 14 100.0 211 Win 40.0 2 40.0 9 16.7 1 27.5 128 62.5 10 11.3 6 27.4 156 Non- Incumbent Lose 60.0 3 60.0 16 83.3 5 72.5 337 37.5 6 88.7 47 72.6 414 Candidates Total 100.0 5 100.0 25 100.0 6 100.0 465 100.0 16 100.0 53 100.0 570 Incumbent 60.0 3 50.0 9 0.0 0 51.9 138 54.5 12 64.7 11 52.6 173 Winning Non-Incumbent 40.0 2 50.0 9 100.0 1 48.1 128 45.5 10 35.3 6 47.4 156 Candidates Total 100.0 5 100.0 18 100.0 1 100.0 266 100.0 22 100.0 17 100.0 329 Incumbent 25.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 8.4 31 60.0 9 51.5 50 18.0 91 Losing Non-Incumbent 75.0 3 100.0 16 100.0 5 91.6 337 40.0 6 48.5 47 82.0 414 Candidates Total 100.0 4 100.0 16 100.0 5 100.0 368 100.0 15 100.0 97 100.0 505 Incumbent 44.4 4 26.5 9 0.0 0 26.7 169 48.4 15 20.9 14 27.0 211 All Non-Incumbent 55.6 5 73.5 25 100.0 6 73.3 465 51.6 16 79.1 53 73.0 570 Candidates Total 100.0 9 100.0 34 100.0 6 100.0 634 100.0 31 100.0 67 100.0 781 *Runoffs are excluded from totals. **Percent may not sum to 100 due to rounding.