DOCSLIB.ORG

Port of Call Or Port of Conflict: the Evolution of the Port of New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

New Jersey Institute of Technology Digital Commons @ NJIT Dissertations Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 5-31-2012 Port of call or port of conflict: the ve olution of the port of New York and New Jersey, port-city relationships, and the potential for land use conflicts on the Newark bay waterfront Colette Santasieri New Jersey Institute of Technology Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/dissertations Part of the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons Recommended Citation Santasieri, Colette, "Port of call or port of conflict: the evolution of the port of New York and New Jersey, port-city relationships, and the potential for land use conflicts on the Newark bay waterfront" (2012). Dissertations. 307. https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/dissertations/307 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at Digital Commons @ NJIT. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ NJIT. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. Please Note: The author retains the copyright while the New Jersey Institute of Technology reserves the right to distribute this thesis or dissertation Printing note: If you do not wish to print this page, then select “Pages from: first page # to: last page #” on the print dialog screen The Van Houten library has removed some of the personal information and all signatures from the approval page and biographical sketches of theses and dissertations in order to protect the identity of NJIT graduates and faculty. ABSTRACT PORT OF CALL OR PORT OF CONFLICT: THE EVOLUTION OF THE PORT OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, PORT-CITY RELATIONSHIPS, AND THE POTENTIAL FOR LAND USE CONFLICTS ON THE NEWARK BAY WATERFRONT by Colette Santasieri This dissertation, a case study of the Port of New York and New Jersey, covers three major research topics: 1) the evolution of the port spanning a period of over 200 years; 2) the relationship between the port (and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey) and five municipalities on Newark Bay; and 3) the potential for land use conflicts between the commercial port operations and redeveloping waterfronts for non-industrial uses. Research about the historical evolution of the Port of New York and New Jersey centers exclusively on the waterfronts and facilities on the Hudson and East Rivers and Upper New York Bay. Sources of information include books, news articles, journal articles, government reports, maps and photographs. The contemporary port-city relationship is studied with respect to the port and the Port Authority, and the municipalities of Elizabeth, Newark, Kearny, Jersey City and Bayonne. Sources of information include news articles, government reports and interviews with local elected officials and staff and representatives from advocacy groups, state agencies, and businesses. Potential for land use conflicts in the Newark Bay area between the commercial port operations and redeveloping waterfronts for non- industrial uses is explored using the same sources as topic 2, with the addition of journal articles and site observations. In this research, the Port-city Evolution Model by Hoyle is tested on the evolution of the Port of New York and New Jersey and is found to be too general and attends only to the relationship between one port and one city. The scale, scope and level of complexity of the Port of New York and New Jersey do not fit the model’s general framework. A new model, derived from this research, captures the evolution of the Port of New York and New Jersey, taking into account the complexity of this port, which has: multiple cargo handling terminals in multiple municipalities in two states; multiple and different port-city relationships that have several relational aspects; and multiple forces shaping the port’s evolution. Analysis of the relationship between the port (and the Port Authority) and five Newark Bay municipalities reveals dynamic, multifaceted associations characterized not only by spatial and functional aspects, but also by economic, political, and societal aspects. The final stage of Hoyle’s Port-city Evolution Model suggests that port- city associations are being renewed. One aspect of the contemporary port- city relationship is conflict between an operating port and redeveloping waterfronts. Research on the Newark Bay area reveals no observable or reported conflicts. However, the potential for conflict exists. Future conflicts could include daily friction from incompatible land uses and loss of waterfront property for commercial maritime use. These conflicts can be exacerbated by the multiplicity of stakeholders involved in waterfront development and port operations. The Port of New York and New Jersey Port-city Evolution Model, derived from this study, adds to the body of literature regarding not only how ports have grown and changed over time but also the causes and consequences of that growth and those changes. This dissertation extends Hoyle’s general and narrowly focused model. It is a comprehensive account of the evolution of the Port of New York and New Jersey that weaves together myriad political, economic, regulatory, commercial, global and societal events, issues and actions into a complex tale. The complexity of this tale mirrors the complexity of this port’s history and conditions in 2011. PORT OF CALL OR PORT OF CONFLICT: THE EVOLUTION OF THE PORT OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, PORT-CITY RELATIONSHIPS, AND THE POTENTIAL FOR LAND USE CONFLICTS ON THE NEWARK BAY WATERFRONT by Colette Santasieri A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of New Jersey Institute of Technology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey – Newark And The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Systems May 2012 Copyright © 2012 by Colette Santasieri ALL RIGHTS RESERVED APPROVAL PAGE PORT OF CALL OR PORT OF CONFLICT: THE EVOLUTION OF THE PORT OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, PORT-CITY RELATIONSHIPS, AND THE POTENTIAL FOR LAND USE CONFLICTS ON THE NEWARK BAY WATERFRONT Colette Santasieri Karen A. Franck, Ph.D., Dissertation Advisor Date Professor, New Jersey Institute of Technology Anthony W. Schuman, RA, Committee Member Date Associate Professor, New Jersey Institute of Technology Georgeen Theodore, RA, Committee Member Date Associate Professor, New Jersey Institute of Technology Thomas H. Wakeman, III, Eng.Sc.D. Date Deputy Director, Center for Maritime Systems, Stevens Institute of Technology IOGAICA SKEC Athr: Cltt Sntr r: tr f hlph t: M 202 Undrrdt nd Grdt Edtn: • tr f hlph n Urbn St r Shl f Arhttr, r Inttt f hnl, r, r, M 202 • Mtr f Sn, Cvl Ennrn r Cll f Ennrn, r Inttt f hnl, r, r, M 8 • hlr f Sn, Envrnntl lnnn nd n C Cll, tr Unvrt, rn, M 84 Mjr: Urbn St v To my husband Mark - the best thing that ever happened to me - for his unwavering love and support To my daughters Andi and Maria - my pride and joy - who provide me with endless reasons to feel loved and be happy and proud To my father, Daniel L. Creange whose greatest advice to me was “Never be afraid to ask questions.” I took that advice to heart. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to acknowledge my dissertation committee members: Dr. Karen A. Franck (Advisor), Dr. Thomas Wakeman, Anthony W. Schuman, RA, and Georgeen Theodore, RA. I appreciate all of the time and effort each one took in reviewing various drafts of this dissertation. I am also appreciative of the comments each one provided, as addressing these comments added value to this dissertation. I am especially appreciative of Dr. Karen Franck’s critiques, advice, insight and wisdom. I would like to thank Sevin Yildiz and Sean Vroom for their valuable assistance and support. I would also like to thank the following elected officials, government staff, advocacy group representatives and business owners for their time, perspectives and insights. Their contributions to this dissertation were very valuable. The Honorable Christian Bollwage, Mayor of the City of Elizabeth. The Honorable Alberto G. Santos, Mayor of the Town of Kearny. The Honorable Jeremiah T. Healy, Mayor of Jersey City. The Honorable Augusto Amador, Councilman of the City of Newark’s East Ward. The Honorable Peter S. Palmer, Freeholder and Chairman of the Freight Initiatives Committee of the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority. Robert Cotter, PP, AICP, Director of the Division of City Planning for the City of Jersey City. vi John Fussa, P.P., City Planner for the City of Bayonne. Stephen D. Marks, PP, AICP, CFM, Director of Planning for Hudson County, New Jersey. Caren S. Franzini, Chief Executive Officer of the New Jersey Economic Development Authority. Joseph C. Curto, President of the New York Shipping Association, Inc. Michael G. McGuinness, Chief Executive Office of the New Jersey chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties. David Stein, Executive Director of Nation’sPort. Roland Lewis, President and CEO of the Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance.
Recommended publications
  • Lower Passaic River Restoration Project and Newark Bay Study

    Lower Passaic River Restoration Project and Newark Bay Study

    Lower Passaic River Restoration Project and Newark Bay Study r.'l"r.'' ~ u.s. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE ~ LowerLower PassaicPassaic RiverRiver RestorationRestoration ProjectProject andand NewarkNewark BayBay StudyStudy Community Involvement Plan June 2006 PREPARED BY: Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 104 Corporate Park Drive White Plains, NY 10602 FOR: US Environmental Protection Agency Region 2 US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Contract No. DACW41-02-D-0003 Community Involvement Plan Lower Passaic River Restoration Project / Newark Bay Study Community Involvement Plan (CIP) Preface We are pleased to release this Community Involvement Plan (CIP) for the Lower Passaic River Restoration Project / Newark Bay Study. The partner agencies are committed to active and open public involvement throughout the life of this project. This CIP provides a toolbox of options for keeping the public informed and for soliciting input. Each respective agency has its own set of guidance with regard to public involvement. This CIP does not attempt to capture every possible outreach initiative among all six partner agencies or fit one specific CIP template. This CIP is divided into two parts to enable the reader to go directly to the sections of greatest interest, and also contains charts and graphics to enable the reader to see at a glance project activities and opportunities for public involvement. Part One includes the following: 1.1 Overview: discusses the purpose and scope of the CIP, as well as legal authorities. 1.2 Project Background: outlines the problems being addressed by the project and describes the project areas and the unique federal-state partnership that is supporting the Lower Passaic River Restoration Project.
  • New York Harbor Tide Wheel

    New York Harbor Tide Wheel

    New York Harbor In most places in the world, tidal currents flood (come in) until high tide and then ebb (go out) until low tide. Not so in New York Tide Wheel Harbor. Depending on the location, the average tidal current lag-- the gap between high or low water and the beginning of the flood or ebb-- can be as much as two hours and 45 minutes. High Tide at the Battery Devised by boatbuilder Don Betts, the tide wheel is a simple means of gauging the tidal current lag on the waterways surround- ing Manhattan. To use it, find the time of high tide at the Battery r No for the date you’re interested in, then spin the inner ‘clock’ wheel ive rt until that time lines up with the arrow at the top of card. The outer R h n F rings tell you the direction of flow at any given time on any of o rth Floo lo s o d o Manhattan’s three ‘rivers.’ N iver Sout d R h F d The tide wheel is only an approximate guide. Unusual wind and u r m lo e le o weather can affect currents, sometimes profoundly, and slack r 12 1 d H v a 1 i H 1 tide times vary widely from one end of the harbor to the other. 2 R 0 Above all, you should remember that no tool or navigational aid is 1 a substitute for experience and good judgment. If you have never t 3 s paddled or rowed in New York Harbor, we strongly urge that 9 a 4 you join an established com- munity boathouse or boating E 8 b 5 b program, or hire a professional guide.
  • I. Goals and Objectives Ii. Land Use Plan

    I. Goals and Objectives Ii. Land Use Plan

    I. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES GOALS ........................................................................................................................................................ I-2 OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................................. I-3 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................. I-3 Housing.................................................................................................................................................... I-7 Circulation ................................................................................................................................................ I-8 Economic Development ......................................................................................................................... I-10 Utilities ................................................................................................................................................... I-11 Conservation ......................................................................................................................................... I-12 Community Facilities ............................................................................................................................. I-13 Parks and Recreation ...........................................................................................................................
  • New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS

    New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS

    New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS Table of CONTENTS Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration. New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN Page left blank intentionally. Table of CONTENTS Acknowledgements The New Jersey Department of Transportation’s Division of Multimodal Services thanks the many organizations and individuals for their time and contribution in making this document possible. New Jersey Department of Transportation Nicole Minutoli Paul Truban Genevieve Clifton Himanshu Patel Andrew Ludasi New Jersey Freight Advisory Committee Calvin Edghill, FHWA Keith Skilton, FHWA Anne Strauss-Wieder, NJTPA Jakub Rowinski, NJTPA Ted Dahlburg, DVRPC Mike Ruane, DVRPC Bill Schiavi, SJTPO David Heller, SJTPO Steve Brown, PANYNJ Victoria Farr, PANYNJ Stephanie Molden, PANYNJ Alan Kearns, NJ TRANSIT Steve Mazur, SJTA Rodney Oglesby, CSX Rick Crawford, Norfolk Southern Michael Fesen, Norfolk Southern Jocelyn Hill, Conrail Adam Baginski, Conrail Kelvin MacKavanagh, New Jersey Short Line Railroad Association Brian Hare, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation David Rosenberg, New York State Department of Transportation Consultant Team Jennifer Grenier, WSP Stephen Chiaramonte, WSP Alan Meyers, WSP Carlos Bastida, WSP Joseph Bryan, WSP Sebastian Guerrero, WSP Debbie Hartman, WSP Ruchi Shrivastava, WSP Reed Sibley, WSP Scudder Smith, WSP Scott Parker, Jacobs Engineering Jayne Yost, Jacobs Engineering
  • Global Terminal, in Bayonne, New Jersey, Has One Clear Advantage

    Global Terminal, in Bayonne, New Jersey, Has One Clear Advantage

    The New Yorker: PRINTABLES Page 1 of 14 WATCHING THE WATERFRONT by WILLIAM FINNEGAN Mobsters, terrorists, and the docks of New York Harbor. Issue of 2006-06-19 Posted 2006-06-12 Global Terminal, in Bayonne, New Jersey, has one clear advantage over most of its competitors for container-ship business in New York Harbor: it’s a straight shot from the Narrows, the harbor’s entrance. From Global’s wharf to Ambrose Seabuoy, out in the Atlantic, where arriving ships meet the pilots, the distance is only fourteen miles. Maurice Byan, the president of Global, told me that ships ca save four hours by docking at his pier, which looks across at lower Manhattan, rather than turning wes and going through the Kill Van Kull and up into Newark Bay, where the biggest container terminals ar in Port Newark and Elizabeth, or to Howland Hook, on the western shore of Staten Island. Also, ships that dock at Global don’t need to pass under the Bayonne Bridge, which is becoming a problem as container ships grow ever larger. Last year, a freighter had to remove its radio towers to make it. Global, at a hundred acres, is a relatively small terminal, but it’s busy. Byan took me on a tour of the pier in his pickup truck, navigating between walls of containers and dodging big, fast-moving equipment—forklifts, bladed stackers, top loaders, and huge rubber-tired gantries, six stories high. “Empty field!” Byan yelled, pointing at some tall piles of multicolored containers, each one eight feet wide by eight feet high and forty feet long, with “CHINA SHIPPING” and “HANJIN” and “P & O NEDLLOYD painted on the sides.
  • Epilogue 1941—Present by BARBARA LA ROCCO

    Epilogue 1941—Present by BARBARA LA ROCCO

    Epilogue 1941—Present By BARBARA LA ROCCO ABOUT A WEEK before A Maritime History of New York was re- leased the United States entered the Second World War. Between Pearl Harbor and VJ-Day, more than three million troops and over 63 million tons of supplies and materials shipped overseas through the Port. The Port of New York, really eleven ports in one, boasted a devel- oped shoreline of over 650 miles comprising the waterfronts of five boroughs of New York City and seven cities on the New Jersey side. The Port included 600 individual ship anchorages, some 1,800 docks, piers, and wharves of every conceivable size which gave access to over a thousand warehouses, and a complex system of car floats, lighters, rail and bridge networks. Over 575 tugboats worked the Port waters. Port operations employed some 25,000 longshoremen and an additional 400,000 other workers.* Ships of every conceivable type were needed for troop transport and supply carriers. On June 6, 1941, the U.S. Coast Guard seized 84 vessels of foreign registry in American ports under the Ship Requisition Act. To meet the demand for ships large numbers of mass-produced freight- ers and transports, called Liberty ships were constructed by a civilian workforce using pre-fabricated parts and the relatively new technique of welding. The Liberty ship, adapted by New York naval architects Gibbs & Cox from an old British tramp ship, was the largest civilian- 262 EPILOGUE 1941 - PRESENT 263 made war ship. The assembly-line production methods were later used to build 400 Victory ships (VC2)—the Liberty ship’s successor.
  • COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT PLAN for the LOWER PASSAIC RIVER

    COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT PLAN for the LOWER PASSAIC RIVER

    COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT PLAN for the LOWER PASSAIC RIVER JULY 2017 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT PLAN for the LOWER PASSAIC RIVER JULY 2017 Prepared by: LOUIS BERGER 412 MOUNT KEMBLE AVENUE MORRISTOWN, NJ 07962-1946 +1.973.407.1000 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............ IV COMMUNITY FEEDBACK .......... 20 INTRODUCTION ................. 2 3.1 Highlights of Community Involvement to Date .................20 OVERVIEW 4 3.2 Timeline of Major Community 1.1 Purpose of the Community Involvement Activities ................21 Involvement Plan ....................4 3.3 Overview of 2016 Community 1.2 Scope of the Community Interview Process ...................22 Involvement Plan ....................5 3.4 Key Community Concerns . .22 1.3 Agency Partnerships and 3.4.1 Superfund Cleanup Activity Concerns 22 Legal Authorities.....................6 3.4.2 Redevelopment and River Access Concerns 23 PROJECT BACKGROUND.......... 8 3.4.3 Health and Quality of Life Concerns 23 3.4.4 Outreach Concerns and Suggestions 23 2.1 History of Contamination ..............8 2.2 Description of Project Area.............10 2.3 Project Activities.....................12 COMMUNITY PROFILE ............ 24 2.4 The Cleanup Plan for the Lower 8.3 Miles 14 4.1 Land Use Characteristics and 2.5 Next Steps .........................15 Infrastructure .......................24 4.1.1 Redevelopment 25 2.6 Remedial Design (RD) and Remedial Action (RA) .................16 4.1.2 Transportation Infrastructure 25 2.7 Long-term Monitoring and Maintenance ..18 4.1.3 Drinking Water, Sewers and Power 25 4.1.4 Flood Control 26 2.8 Local Workforce Participation During Construction ......19 4.1.5 Recreation 26 4.2 Population and Demographics..........26 4.2.1 Population 27 4.2.2 Age 27 4.2.3 Household Income 27 4.2.4 Race and Ethnicity 28 4.2.5 Immigrant and Minority Population and Linguistic Trends 28 4.2.6 Environmental Justice 29 4.2.7 Education 29 IV COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT PLAN FOR THE LOWER PASSAIC RIVER COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 5.2.14 Public Meetings and ACTION PLAN..................
  • INFORMATION Sandy Hook Pilots

    INFORMATION Sandy Hook Pilots

    INFORMATION Sandy Hook Pilots 2015 Tide Tables NOTICE THIS PUBLICATION CONTAINS TIDE AND/OR TIDAL CURRENT PREDICTIONS AND ASSOCIATED INFORMATION PRODUCED BY ANDOBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OFCOMMERCE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA), NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE. THESE PREDICTIONS ARE RECEIVED PRIOR TO OCTOBER OF THE PREVIOUS YEAR AND ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION BY NOAA WITHOUT NOTICE. TIDES MAY VARY WITH WEATHER CONDITIONS. ALL OTHER INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PUBLICATION IS OBTAINED FROM SOURCES BELIEVED TO BE RELIABLE. WE DISCLAIM LIABILITY FOR ANY MISTAKES OR OMISSIONS IN ANY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN. THE TIME OF TIDES SET FORTH IN THESE TABLES IS GIVEN AT EASTERN STANDARD TIME. PLEASE NOTE: SLACK WATER TIMES ARE AN ESTIMATE BASED ON PILOT OBSERVATIONS AND THEIR ACCURACY CANNOT BE GUARANTEED. Compliments of THE UNITED NEW YORK SANDY HOOK PILOTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION and THE UNITED NEW JERSEY SANDY HOOK PILOTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION 201 Edgewater Street Staten Island, N.Y. 10305 www.sandyhookpilots.com Masters or Agents are requested to advise Pilots of any change in arrival time 12 hours in advance. New York Pilots ........................................... 718.448.3900 New Jersey Pilots .......................................... 718.448.3900 Hell Gate Pilots ............................................. 718.448.3900 Long Island Sound Pilots .............................718.448.3900 Hudson River Pilots ......................................718.815.4316 Dispatch Email ........... [email protected]
  • New York and New Jersey Harbor Anchorages Final General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Assessment

    New York and New Jersey Harbor Anchorages Final General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Assessment

    New York and New Jersey Harbor Anchorages Final General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Assessment Norfolk District December 2019 The Port Authority of NY& NJ 803 Front Street 4 World Trade Center Norfolk, VA 23510 New York, NY 10007 New York and New Jersey Harbor Anchorages Final General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Assessment Cooperating agencies: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration/National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Coast Guard, NY Division of Historic Preservation, NY State Department of Environmental Conservation Department U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CIVIL WORKS MISSION Dedicated to providing quality, responsive service to the nation in peace and war. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NAVIGATION MISSION Provide safe, reliable, efficient, and environmentally sustainable waterborne transportation systems for movement of commerce, national security, and recreation. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING PRINCIPLES Foster sustainability as a way of life throughout the organization. Proactively consider environmental consequences of all U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) activities and act accordingly. Create mutually supporting economic and environmentally sustainable solutions. Continue to meet our corporate responsibility and accountability under the law for activities undertaken by the USACE, which may impact human and natural environment. Consider the environment in employing a risk management and systems approach throughout the life cycles of
  • Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General Comprehensive Healthcare Inspection Program Review of the VA New York

    Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General Comprehensive Healthcare Inspection Program Review of the VA New York

    Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General Office of Healthcare Inspections Report No. 17-01762-88 Comprehensive Healthcare Inspection Program Review of the VA New York Harbor Healthcare System New York, New York February 7, 2018 Washington, DC 20420 In addition to general privacy laws that govern release of medical information, disclosure of certain veteran health or other private information may be prohibited by various Federal statutes including, but not limited to, 38 U.S.C. §§ 5701, 5705, and 7332, absent an exemption or other specified circumstances. As mandated by law, OIG adheres to privacy and confidentiality laws and regulations protecting veteran health or other private information in this report. To Report Suspected Wrongdoing in VA Programs and Operations Telephone: 1-800-488-8244 Web site: www.va.gov/oig CHIP Review of the VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY Glossary CBOC community based outpatient clinic CEB Clinical Executive Board Chief Nurse Associate Director for Patient Care Services Executive CHIP Comprehensive Healthcare Inspection Program EHR electronic health record EOC environment of care facility VA New York Harbor Healthcare System FY fiscal year MH mental health OIG Office of Inspector General OPPE Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation PC primary care P&T Pharmacy and Therapeutics PTSD post-traumatic stress disorder QM Quality Management QSV quality, safety, and value RRTP residential rehabilitation treatment program SAIL Strategic Analytics for Improvement and Learning SPOT Surgical, Procedural, Operative, and Therapeutics TJC The Joint Commission UM utilization management VHA Veterans Health Administration VISN Veterans Integrated Service Network VA OIG Office of Healthcare Inspections CHIP Review of the VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY Table of Contents Page Report Overview........................................................................................................
  • Regular Meeting of the Municipal Council of The

    Regular Meeting of the Municipal Council of The

    REGULAR MEETING OF THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, NEW JERSEY, HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 630 AVENUE C, ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 16, 2016 The Council met at 7:05 P.M. The Council President Nadrowski announced: “I would like to advise all those present that notice of this regular meeting of the Municipal Council of the City of Bayonne of March 16, 2016 has been provided to the public in accordance with the provisions of the Open Public Meetings Act of the State of New Jersey. Notice of time and place of the meeting has been included in the annual notice of meetings, which was posted and filed with the City Clerk, and with the Jersey Journal and the Star Ledger. An additional notice of time and place was posted and filed with the City Clerk and was forwarded to the Jersey Journal and the Star Ledger by on March 11, 2016.” The Regular Meeting of the Municipal Council of the City of Bayonne is now in session. The Clerk called the roll. Present were: Council Members Cotter, Gullace, LaPelusa Perez and President Nadrowski. The Council President led the Pledge of Allegiance. * * * * * * * * * * 01. The clerk announced: AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED, “ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, COUNTY OF HUDSON, NEW JERSEY ADOPTING A REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS BLOCK 330, LOTS 6-12 (17 W. 5TH STREET; 15 W. 5TH STREET; 11 W. 5TH STREET; 9 W. 5TH STREET; 155-157 BROADWAY; 159 BROADWAY; AND 161 BROADWAY) ON THE TAX MAP OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE,” which was introduced and passed a first reading at a meeting held February 17, 2016, was published in the Jersey Journal and posted on the bulletin board as required by law, with notice that it would be further considered for final passage following a public hearing at this meeting of March 16, 2016, and was referred to the planning board for its review is now before the Council for its consideration and a public hearing.
  • New Jersey Turnpike Authority ADMINISTRATION BUILDING P.O

    New Jersey Turnpike Authority ADMINISTRATION BUILDING P.O

    1998 Annual New Jersey Report Turnpike Authority Frank X. McDermott Nancy H. Becker Raymond M. Pocino Chairman Vice Chair Treasurer Joseph P. (J.P.) Miele Jerome P. Amedeo James Weinstein Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner NJDOT Lawrence F. Pat Kramer Edward Gross Diane Scaccetti Commissioner Executive Director Deputy Executive Director From Sept. 1994 to Nov. 1998 Staff Consultants Ralph J. Bruzzichesi, Director of Technology & Admin. Services Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti William J. Burke, Director of Toll Collection General Counsel Randy Corman, Director of Law HNTB Corporation Robert F. Dale, Director of Operations Gene ral Consulting Engineer Lynn M. Fleeger, Acting Director of Communications/ Paulus, Sokolowski & Sartor Chief Information Officer Gene ral Environmental Consultant Mary-Elizabeth Garrity, Director of Human Resources KPMGLLP John G. Kunna, Chief Engineer Auditor Catherine A. Schladebeck, Director of Finance & Budgets Wilbur Smith Associates David L. Wingerter, Director of Maintenance Traffic & Revenue Consultant New Jersey Turnpike Authority ADMINISTRATION BUILDING P.O. BOX 1121 NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY 08903 (732) 247-0900 COMMISSIONERS FRANK X. McDERMOTT, Chairman NANCY H. BECKER, Vice Chair RAYMOND M. POCINO, Treasurer JOSEPH (J.P.) MIELE JEROME P. AMEDEO JAMES WEINSTEIN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EDWARD GROSS To the Honorable Christine Todd Whitman, Governor and the Members of the New Jersey Legislature: It is my privilege to submit to you the 1998 Annual Report of the New Jersey Turnpike Authority. In 1998, the New Jersey Turnpike moved a record 209,408,270 vehicles almost 5,000,000,000 miles. Patrons including business and industry, commuters, residents and tourists, traveled safely and efficiently over 148 miles of roadway.