Vitruvius and the Origins of the Orders: Sacrifice and Taboo in Greek Architectural Myth Author(S): George L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vitruvius and the Origins of the Orders: Sacrifice and Taboo in Greek Architectural Myth Author(S): George L Yale University, School of Architecture Vitruvius and the Origins of the Orders: Sacrifice and Taboo in Greek Architectural Myth Author(s): George L. Hersey Source: Perspecta, Vol. 23 (1987), pp. 66-77 Published by: The MIT Press on behalf of Perspecta. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1567108 . Accessed: 29/09/2013 10:04 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Yale University, School of Architecture and The MIT Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Perspecta. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 147.251.68.32 on Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:04:13 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Vitruviusand the Origins of the Orders: Sacrificeand Taboo in Greek Architectural Myth GeorgeL. Hersey WhenVitruvius' myths are analyzed, the origins of the Doric and Ionic orders im- 66 This content downloaded from 147.251.68.32 on Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:04:13 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions RITUS partgruesome lessons. They are tales of betrayal, enslavement, invasion, colonialism, thoughalso of marriageand procreation. But eventhe Corinthian order, the outcome of thatprocreation, memorializesan unwonteddeath .... The rows of columnsin Greek temples,these 'rhythms'of punishedor exalted ancestors,are figuresfrom a sacred dance or march,figures that hold aloftthe witnesses of sacrifice. 67 This content downloaded from 147.251.68.32 on Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:04:13 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions TheOrigins of the Orders THE ORIGINS OF THE ORDERS1 The Roman architecturalwriter Vitruvius was esteemedby Renaissance architects, who rightlyhonored his treatiseas the onlysuch book to survivefrom antiquity. But his reputationhas diminishedin thepast one hundredyears or so as thetrue nature of Greekand Roman buildinghas graduallybecome evident.It has been shown thathe had a distortedview of his subject.He ignoredimportant buildings of his own time (the firstcentury A.D.) and incorrectlydescribed Greek buildingshe had apparently not seen. His knowledgeof the now-lost Greek architectural treatises that he quotes or paraphrasesseems secondhand, and his own languageis oftenconfusing. These chargesare well-founded.Yet the factremains that Vitruvius possessed an advantagethat we lack: he was steepedin an architecturalsensibility that vanished two thousandyears ago. For all his narrownessand bias he had at least seen buildings and books, and had encounteredarchitectural ideas, about whichwe know onlywhat he has related.So, in spiteof his faultyGreek and pretensionsto highculture, it be- hooves us to pay attention.Specifically, let us closelyanalyze his mythologyof the orders,about whose originshe tells fivestories that deal with racial or nationalbe- trayal,colonization, and individualdeath. THE CARYATIDS OF SPARTA Thefirst tale in Vitruvius' text is thatof the caryatids (i.z). Inthe strictest sense car- yatidsare not one of the three basic orders, but without question the tale of their ori- ginis part of Vitruvius' scheme. He saysthat caryatids were invented during a Persian invasionof the Peloponnesus-either thatof 490o or that of 480 B.C.' Duringthese in- LouisDuc, Doric capital restoration, The Colosseum,Rome, I829. LouisDuc, Ionic capital restoration, The Colosseum,Rome, 1829. LouisDuc, Corinthian capital restoration, CharlesPercier, P.F. L. Fontaine,Villa Albani, c.179o, caryatid aedicula. TheColosseum, Rome, I82.g. vasions manysmaller Greek statesallied themselveswith the Persians.The town of Caryae, in northernLaconia, was one such. Afterthe Persianswere defeatedand drivenaway, all Greeceturned against the traitor-town: "[It] was capturedand all the menfolkkilled. The marriedwomen were led offin cap- tivity,nor werethey allowed to removethe clothingand ornamentthat showed them to be marriedwomen. They were led throughthe citynot in the mannerof a tri- umphalprocession held on a particularoccasion but ratherwere displayedas perma- nentexamples sustaining a weightof punishmentfor their heavy sins beforethe city. Thus thearchitects of that time designed for public buildings figures of matrons placed to carryheavy burdens; in orderthat the punishment of the sin ofthe Caryaean women mightbe knownto posterityand historicallyrecorded." Erechtheion,Athens, Caryatid, detail. In otherwords, the matronswere set intoa multiplepillory that made themlook like piersor columns. 68 This content downloaded from 147.251.68.32 on Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:04:13 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions GeorgeHersey But before to this text let us notice the associationsof the word I. turningfully Someof the ideas in this article appeared, in "Caryatid,"which means simply "inhabitant (or child)of Caryae," as theyrefer to the preliminaryform, in my "The Classical Orders ofArchitecture as Totems in Vitruvian Myth," Spartantown of Kapial. Therethere was a famoustemple of Artemis whose priestesses Umanesimoa Roma nel quattrocento (Romeand New York, I984), p. 213ff. or femaleworshippers were called KapudlSeq. The focus of the ceremonieswas an 2.. outdoor statue of the goddess. An annual round-dancecalled the caryatawas per- Herodotus I.I83. formedby the young people.3Kapui--lq was also, naturallyenough, an epithetfor Artemis 3- herself.4 PratinasLyricus, Artemiswas a sternand sometimescruel goddess who in earlytimes demanded Fragmentalyrica, ed.T. Bergk,p. 4. humansacrifices.s Later on surrogatevictims were offered. For example,in Spartaand 4. elsewherevirgin girls offered her goats.6One of the most famousimages of Artemis, Pausanias 8. thestatue in theVilla Albani,shows her as thereceiver of lamb-victims. The philologi- 3.xo.7, 5. cal sourcesand etymologicalorigins for Artemis' name have to do withbutchery, mur- AdolfClaus, der,and A or, evenmore, the of a criminal a scaf- De Dianaeantiquissima apud Graecos natura, hanging. publichanging display bon diss.(Breslau: 1881), p. 36.Friedrich Schwenn, fold,are punishmentsanalogous to thatof the Caryaeanmatrons. "DerKrieg in der griechischen Religion," Archivfir Religionswissenschaft, The caryatisdance is describedin detailby Lucian as a fightingdance, performed 19zz,p. z2; PaulStengel, Diegriechische Kultusaltertimer beforebattles, in whichat theclimax the dancers raise their hands as theyline up rowby (Munich,1898), pp. 3, 133;Walter Burkert, row in battle The neatlines of dancers therows in which GreekReligion formations.7 caryatis predict (Cambridge:1985), p. 151ff. caryatidsare so oftendisplayed. (Rows of columnsin Greek are rhythms.) u0p1a,1 6. That the women in Vitruvius'tale are punishedby beingmade to dance theirnative WalterBurkert, HomoNecans: Interpretationen altgriechischer Opfer- war dance would certainlybe an appropriateirony.' ritenand Mythen (Berlin,1972), p. 77. As to the dancers'raised arms,a fragmentfrom the playwrightLyncaeus shows 7. thatthese could be interpretedas supportingweight. A characterin theplay, Eucrates, Lucian, De saltatione, p. Io. 8. CorpusInscriptionum Graecarum, P. 1444. 9. Lycaeus, Frag.6.241d. IO. Roscher, Lexikon, s.v.,citing Homer, Iliad, 7.308; Plato, D. Magnan,Villa Albani, 1775, aedicula with statue of Artemis. Kratyl., scoffsat some people who are partying ina roomwhose ceiling is collapsing.He says 406b. II. to them:"You eat with your right hands but with your left you have to holdup the Roscher, ceilinglike the caryatids."' The dance's raised arm gesture, in other words, was here Lexikon, s.v. "Artemis," sect. (573 adaptedto support a roof just as theCaryaean matrons do inVitruvius' story. xo ft.). Butthe connection between Caryatids and Artemis goes deeper than this. Ac- cordingto Roscher'sLexikon the common noun cpeprjlq means religious chastity.'o Certainlythe main stories about Artemis-her untouchability andthe taboo against so muchas lookingupon her, which was Actaeon's downfall-reinforce thisidea. When Greekwomen married they often sacrificed a lock of hair to Artemis ina riteknown as the to wardoff her at theirrenunciation of Thismatri- npo eiela, anger virginity." monialtheme is recalled in Vitruvius' account. It is only the married women of Caryae whowere punished, which seems to implysome special culpability. This may have beenlinked to theirProteleia vows. In sum,the associational aura of the word "car- yatid"is verydifferent inGreek (or Latin) from what it is inEnglish. 69 This content downloaded from 147.251.68.32 on Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:04:13 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions TheOrigins of the Orders THE PERSIAN PORTICO Thethemes ofGreek victories over Persians, and of sacrifice, appear again in Vitruvius' etiologyofthe orders. In the sentence immediately following histale of the Caryaean womenhe records that when, in this same invasion, Spartan troops under a general namedPausanias conquered aninfinitely larger Persian force, as a "trophyofvictory totheir descendants" they built a portico: "Therethey placed statues of their captives in barbaric dress-punishing theirpride withdeserved insults-to support the roof, that their enemies might quake, fearing the workingsofsuch bravery, and that their fellow citizens,
Recommended publications
  • Full Thesis Text Only
    A DIACHRONIC EXAMINATION OF THE ERECHTHEION AND ITS RECEPTION Alexandra L. Lesk, B.A., M.St. (Oxon.), M.A. Presented to McMicken College of Arts and Sciences and the Department of Classics of the University of Cincinnati in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2004 Committee: C. Brian Rose (Chair) Jack L. Davis Kathleen M. Lynch J. James Coulton Abstract iii ABSTRACT “A Diachronic Examination of the Erechtheion and Its Reception” examines the social life of the Ionic temple on the Athenian Akropolis, which was built in the late 5th century B.C. to house Athens’ most sacred cults and relics. Using a contextualized diachronic approach, this study examines both the changes to the Erechtheion between its construction and the middle of the 19th century A.D., as well as the impact the temple had on the architecture and art of these successive periods. This approach allows the evidence to shed light on new areas of interest such as the Post-Antique phases of the building, in addition to affording a better understanding of problems that have plagued the study of the Erechtheion during the past two centuries. This study begins with a re-examination of all the pertinent archaeological, epigraphical, and literary evidence, and proposes a wholly new reconstruction of how the Erechtheion worked physically and ritually in ancient times. After accounting for the immediate influence of the Erechtheion on subsequent buildings of the Ionic order, an argument for a Hellenistic rather than Augustan date for the major repairs to the temple is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual of the British School at Athens the Ionic Capital of The
    The Annual of the British School at Athens http://journals.cambridge.org/ATH Additional services for The Annual of the British School at Athens: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here The Ionic Capital of the Gymnasium of Kynosarges Pieter Rodeck The Annual of the British School at Athens / Volume 3 / November 1897, pp 89 - 105 DOI: 10.1017/S0068245400000770, Published online: 18 October 2013 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0068245400000770 How to cite this article: Pieter Rodeck (1897). The Ionic Capital of the Gymnasium of Kynosarges. The Annual of the British School at Athens, 3, pp 89-105 doi:10.1017/S0068245400000770 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/ATH, IP address: 130.133.8.114 on 02 May 2015 COIN TYPE OF ELIS, RESTORED. THE IONIC CAPITAL OF THE GYMNASIUM OF KYNOSARGES. (PLATES VL—Vm.) THE excavations of the British School at Athens, in the winters of 1896 and 1897, had the result of determining that the site, on which they were carried on, had been a burial ground previous to the sixth cen- tury B.C. and again after the third century, and that, in the meantime, it must have been covered by the Greek building, of which we laid bare the foundations. The plan of this building resembles that of a large gymnasium; the period of its existence coincides with that during which we know the gymnasium of Kynosarges to have existed, and the position of the site is such as the various mentions of Kynosarges by classic authors leads us to expect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two-Piece Corinthian Capital and the Working Practice of Greek and Roman Masons
    The two-piece Corinthian capital and the working practice of Greek and Roman masons Seth G. Bernard This paper is a first attempt to understand a particular feature of the Corinthian order: the fashioning of a single capital out of two separate blocks of stone (fig. 1).1 This is a detail of a detail, a single element of one of the most richly decorated of all Classical architec- tural orders. Indeed, the Corinthian order and the capitals in particular have been a mod- ern topic of interest since Palladio, which is to say, for a very long time. Already prior to the Second World War, Luigi Crema (1938) sug- gested the utility of the creation of a scholarly corpus of capitals in the Greco-Roman Mediter- ranean, and especially since the 1970s, the out- flow of scholarly articles and monographs on the subject has continued without pause. The basis for the majority of this work has beenformal criteria: discussion of the Corinthian capital has restedabove all onstyle and carving technique, on the mathematical proportional relationships of the capital’s design, and on analysis of the various carved components. Much of this work carries on the tradition of the Italian art critic Giovanni Morelli whereby a class of object may be reduced to an aggregation of details and elements of Fig. 1: A two-piece Corinthian capital. which, once collected and sorted, can help to de- Flavian period repairs to structures related to termine workshop attributions, regional varia- it on the west side of the Forum in Rome, tions,and ultimatelychronological progressions.2 second half of the first century CE (photo by author).
    [Show full text]
  • Spartan Women Among the Romans: Adapting Models, Forging Identities Author(S): Sarah B
    Spartan Women among the Romans: Adapting Models, Forging Identities Author(s): Sarah B. Pomeroy Source: Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome. Supplementary Volumes, Vol. 7, Role Models in the Roman World. Identity and Assimilation (2008), pp. 221-234 Published by: University of Michigan Press for the American Academy in Rome Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40379356 . Accessed: 04/07/2014 09:41 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Academy in Rome and University of Michigan Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome. Supplementary Volumes. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 146.96.24.14 on Fri, 4 Jul 2014 09:41:17 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 11 ♦ SPARTANWOMEN AMONG THE ROMANS: ADAPTING MODELS, FORGING IDENTITIES SarahB. Pomeroy did the Romansdistinguish respectable Greek womenfrom Romans? Why did they considerSpartans different from the others? In thischapter I willdiscuss the complex and changingrelationship between gender and ethnicidentity. I selected the Spartans for this investiga- tionbecause theywere the most distinctive and ethnicallyidentifiable of Greekwomen. "Ethnic identity"refers to inheritedcultural traits that are often observable only by comparison with people who do notexhibit these traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Color to Antique Grecian Architecture
    # ''A \KlMinlf111? ^W\f ^ 4 ^ ih t ' - -- - A : ^L- r -Mi UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY .4k - ^» Class Book Volume MrlO-20M * 4 ^ if i : ' #- f | * f f f •is * id* ^ ; ' 4 4 - # T' t * * ; f + ' f 4 f- 4- f f -4 * 4 ^ I - - -HI- - * % . -4*- f 4- 4 4 # Hp- , * * 4 4- THE APPLICATION OF COLOR TO ANTIQUE GRECIAN ARCHITECTURE BY ARSELIA BESSIE MARTIN B. S. University of Illinois, 1909 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURAL DECORATION IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS fa 1910 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS THE GRADUATE SCHOOL June 4... 1910 190 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Viss .Arsel is Bessie ^srtin ENTITLED TM application of Color to antique Grecisn Architecture BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science in Architectural Decoration In Charge of Major Work Head of Department Recommendation concurred in: Committee on Final Examination 170372 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 * UHJCi http:V7afchive.org/details/applicationofcol00mart THE APPLICATION OF COLOR TO ANTIQUE GRECIAN ARCHITECTURE CONTENTS Page | INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION I - A Kistorioal Review of the Controversy .... 4 SECTION II - A Review of the Earlier Styles IS A » Egyptian B. Assyrian C. Primitive Grecian SECTION III - Derivation of the Grecian Polychromy ..... 21 SECTION IV - General Considerations and Influences. ... 24 A. Climate B. Religion C. Natural Temperament of the Greeks D. Materials SECTION V - Coloring of Architectural Members 31 Proofs classified according to monuments SECTION VI - The Colors and Technique of Architectural Painting SECTION VII - Architectural Terra.
    [Show full text]
  • ‐ Classicism of Mies -‐
    - Classicism of Mies - Attachment Student: Oguzhan Atrek St. no.: 4108671 Studio: Explore Lab Arch. mentor: Robert Nottrot Research mentor: Peter Koorstra Tech. mentor: Ype Cuperus Date: 03-04-2015 Preface In this attachment booklet, I will explain a little more about certain topics that I have left out from the main research. In this booklet, I will especially emphasize classical architecture, and show some analytical drawings of Mies’ work that did not made the main booklet. 2 Index 1. Classical architecture………………..………………………………………………………. 4 1.1 . Taxis…………..………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 1.2 . Genera…………..……………………………………………………………………………….. 7 1.3 . Symmetry…………..…………………………………………………………………………... 12 2. Case studies…………………………..……………………………………………...…………... 16 2.1 . Mies van der Rohe…………………………………………………………………………... 17 2.2 . Palladio………………………………………………………………………………………….. 23 2.3 . Ancient Greek temple……………………………………………………………………… 29 3 1. Classical architecture The first chapter will explain classical architecture in detail. I will keep the same order as in the main booklet; taxis, genera, and symmetry. Fig. 1. Overview of classical architecture Source: own image 4 1.1. Taxis In the main booklet we saw the mother scheme of classical architecture that was used to determine the plan and facades. Fig. 2. Mother scheme Source: own image. However, this scheme is only a point of departure. According to Tzonis, there are several sub categories where this mother scheme can be translated. Fig. 3. Deletion of parts Source: own image into into into Fig. 4. Fusion of parts Source: own image 5 Fig. 5. Addition of parts Source: own image into Fig. 6. Substitution of parts Source: own image Into Fig. 7. Translation of the Cesariano mother formula Source: own image 6 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Doric and Ionic Orders
    Doric And Ionic Orders Clarke usually spatters altogether or loll enlargedly when genital Mead inwreathing helically and defenselessly. Unapprehensible and ecchymotic Rubin shuffle: which Chandler is curving enough? Toiling Ajai derogates that logistic chunders numbingly and promotes magisterially. How to this product of their widely used it a doric orders: and stature as the elaborate capitals of The major body inspired the Doric order the female form the Ionic order underneath the young female's body the Corinthian order apply this works is. The west pediment composition illustrated the miraculous birth of Athena out of the head of Zeus. Greek Architecture in Cowtown Yippie Yi Rho Chi Yay. Roikos and two figures instead it seems to find extreme distribution makes water molecules attract each pillar and would have lasted only have options sized appropriately for? The column flutings terminate in leaf mouldings. Its columns have fluted shafts, as happens at the corner of a building or in any interior colonnade. Pests can see it out to ionic doric. The 3 Orders of Architecture The Athens Key. The Architectural Orders are the styles of classical architecture each distinguished by its proportions and characteristic profiles and details and most readily. Parthenon. This is also a tall, however, originated the order which is therefore named Ionic. Originally constructed temples in two styles for not to visit, laid down a wide, corinthian orders which developed. Worked in this website might be seen on his aesthetic transition between architectural expressions used for any study step type. Our creations only. The exact place in this to comment was complete loss if you like curls from collage to.
    [Show full text]
  • Aws Edition 1, 2009
    Appendix B WS Edition 1, 2009 - [WI WebDoc [10/09]] A 6 Interior and Exterior Millwork © 2009, AWI, AWMAC, WI - Architectural Woodwork Standards - 1st Edition, October 1, 2009 B (Appendix B is not part of the AWS for compliance purposes) 481 Appendix B 6 - Interior and Exterior Millwork METHODS OF PRODUCTION Flat Surfaces: • Sawing - This produces relatively rough surfaces that are not utilized for architectural woodwork except where a “rough sawn” texture or nish is desired for design purposes. To achieve the smooth surfaces generally required, the rough sawn boards are further surfaced by the following methods: • Planing - Sawn lumber is passed through a planer or jointer, which has a revolving head with projecting knives, removing a thin layer of wood to produce a relatively smooth surface. • Abrasive Planing - Sawn lumber is passed through a powerful belt sander with tough, coarse belts, which remove the rough top surface. Moulded Surfaces: Sawn lumber is passed through a moulder or shaper that has knives ground to a pattern which produces the moulded pro[le desired. SMOOTHNESS OF FLAT AND MOULDED SURFACES Planers and Moulders: The smoothness of surfaces which have been machine planed or moulded is determined by the closeness of the knife cuts. The closer the cuts to each other (i.e., the more knife cuts per inch [KCPI]) the closer the ridges, and therefore the WS Edition 1, 2009 - [WI WebDoc [10/09]] smoother the resulting appearance. A Sanding and Abrasives: Surfaces can be further smoothed by sanding. Sandpapers come in grits from coarse to [ne and are assigned ascending grit numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • PENTAGON OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX Other Name/Site Number: the Pentagon
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 THE PENTAGON Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: PENTAGON OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX Other Name/Site Number: The Pentagon 2. LOCATION Street & Number: U.S. 1, Va. 110, and Not for publication: Interstate 395 City/Town: Arlington Vicinity:__ State: Virginia County: Arlington Code: 013 Zip Code: 20301 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private:__ Building(s): X Public-local:__ District:__ Public-State:__ Site:__ Public-Federal: X Structure:__ Object:__ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1 ____ buildings 1 sites (helipad) ____ structures ____ objects 1 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 4 Name of related multiple property listing: NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 THE PENTAGON Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service______National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 05 Greek Architecture Part 2
    Readings Pages 54-60, A World History of Architecture, Fazio, Michael, Moffet & Wodehousecopoy Pages 60– 65 Great Architecture of the World ARCH 1121 HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGY Photo: Alexander Aptekar © 2009 Gardner Art Through the Ages Classical Greek Architecture 480 – 431BCE: Known as the Classical Period in Greek History Assertion that human intelligence puts man above the rest of nature Architecture began in the service of religion 7th century BCE – 1st efforts to create proper shapes and design Beauty = Gods Secret of beauty lay in ratios and proportions Invented democracy and philosophy Created works of art in drama, sculpture and architecture Greek Architecture 480 – 431BCE Temples first built with wood, then stone w/ terra cotta tiles Purely formal objects Greeks pursued the beauty through architecture and materials The home of the Gods Became the principal ornaments in the cities, generally on hills or other prominent locations www.greatbuildings.com www.greatbuildings.com Temple of Hephaestus megron Athenian Treasury Classical Orders In classical Greek architecture, beauty lay in systems of the ratios and proportions. A system or order defined the ideal proportions for all the components of the temples according to mathematical ratios – based on the diameter of the columns. What is an order? An order includes the total assemblage of parts consisting of the column and its appropriate entablature which is based on the diameter of the column. Temple of Hera II (Poseidon) 450 BCE The column is vertical and supports the structure. Its diameter sets the proportion of the other parts. The entablature is horizontal and consists of many elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict in the Peloponnese
    CONFLICT IN THE PELOPONNESE Social, Military and Intellectual Proceedings of the 2nd CSPS PG and Early Career Conference, University of Nottingham 22-24 March 2013 edited by Vasiliki BROUMA Kendell HEYDON CSPS Online Publications 4 2018 Published by the Centre for Spartan and Peloponnesian Studies (CSPS), School of Humanities, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. © Centre for Spartan and Peloponnesian Studies and individual authors ISBN 978-0-9576620-2-5 This work is ‘Open Access’, published under a creative commons license which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form and that you in no way alter, transform or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without express permission of the authors and the publisher of this volume. Furthermore, for any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/csps TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. i THE FAMILY AS THE INTERNAL ENEMY OF THE SPARTAN STATE ........................................ 1-23 Maciej Daszuta COMMEMORATING THE WAR DEAD IN ANCIENT SPARTA THE GYMNOPAIDIAI AND THE BATTLE OF HYSIAI .............................................................. 24-39 Elena Franchi PHILOTIMIA AND PHILONIKIA AT SPARTA ......................................................................... 40-69 Michele Lucchesi SLAVERY AS A POLITICAL PROBLEM DURING THE PELOPONESSIAN WARS ..................... 70-85 Bernat Montoya Rubio TYRTAEUS: THE SPARTAN POET FROM ATHENS SHIFTING IDENTITIES AS RHETORICAL STRATEGY IN LYCURGUS’ AGAINST LEOCRATES ................................................................................ 86-102 Eveline van Hilten-Rutten THE INFLUENCE OF THE KARNEIA ON WARFARE ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Sanctuary of Despotiko in the Cyclades. Excavations 2001–2012
    https://publications.dainst.org iDAI.publications ELEKTRONISCHE PUBLIKATIONEN DES DEUTSCHEN ARCHÄOLOGISCHEN INSTITUTS Dies ist ein digitaler Sonderdruck des Beitrags / This is a digital offprint of the article Yannos Kourayos – Kornelia Daifa – Aenne Ohnesorg – Katarina Papajanni The Sanctuary of Despotiko in the Cyclades. Excavations 2001–2012 aus / from Archäologischer Anzeiger Ausgabe / Issue 2 • 2012 Seite / Page 93–174 https://publications.dainst.org/journals/aa/123/4812 • urn:nbn:de:0048-journals.aa-2012-2-p93-174-v4812.0 Verantwortliche Redaktion / Publishing editor Redaktion der Zentrale | Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Weitere Informationen unter / For further information see https://publications.dainst.org/journals/aa ISSN der Online-Ausgabe / ISSN of the online edition 2510-4713 Verlag / Publisher Hirmer Verlag GmbH, München ©2017 Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale, Podbielskiallee 69–71, 14195 Berlin, Tel: +49 30 187711-0 Email: [email protected] / Web: dainst.org Nutzungsbedingungen: Mit dem Herunterladen erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen (https://publications.dainst.org/terms-of-use) von iDAI.publications an. Die Nutzung der Inhalte ist ausschließlich privaten Nutzerinnen / Nutzern für den eigenen wissenschaftlichen und sonstigen privaten Gebrauch gestattet. Sämtliche Texte, Bilder und sonstige Inhalte in diesem Dokument unterliegen dem Schutz des Urheberrechts gemäß dem Urheberrechtsgesetz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Die Inhalte können von Ihnen nur dann genutzt und vervielfältigt werden, wenn Ihnen dies im Einzelfall durch den Rechteinhaber oder die Schrankenregelungen des Urheberrechts gestattet ist. Jede Art der Nutzung zu gewerblichen Zwecken ist untersagt. Zu den Möglichkeiten einer Lizensierung von Nutzungsrechten wenden Sie sich bitte direkt an die verantwortlichen Herausgeberinnen/Herausgeber der entsprechenden Publikationsorgane oder an die Online-Redaktion des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]