DOCSLIB.ORG

Analyzing Requests for Permissions of Bots in Wikidata

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analyzing Requests for Permissions of Bots in Wikidata Approving Automation: Analyzing Requests for Permissions of Bots in Wikidata Mariam Farda-Sarbas Hong Zhu Human-Centered Computing | Freie Universität Berlin Human-Centered Computing | Freie Universität Berlin [email protected] [email protected] Marisa Frizzi Nest Claudia Müller-Birn Human-Centered Computing | Freie Universität Berlin Human-Centered Computing | Freie Universität Berlin [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION Wikidata, initially developed to serve as a central structured knowl- Wikidata, the sister project of Wikipedia, was launched in October edge base for Wikipedia, is now a melting point for structured data 2012. Similar to Wikipedia, Wikidata is a peer production commu- for companies, research projects and other peer production com- nity with more than 20 K active users1. It serves as the primary munities. Wikidata’s community consists of humans and bots, and source for structured data of Wikimedia projects, especially for most edits in Wikidata come from these bots. Prior research has Wikipedia. Wikidata is also currently being used by commercial raised concerns regarding the challenges for editors to ensure the services, such as Apple’s assistant Siri, in research projects, such as quality of bot-generated data, such as the lack of quality control WikiGenomes2 and other peer-production communities, such as and knowledge diversity. In this research work, we provide one way OpenStreetMap3. Thus, the quality of data in Wikidata is crucial, of tackling these challenges by taking a closer look at the approval not only for Wikidata itself but also for the projects which rely on process of bot activity on Wikidata. We collected all bot requests, Wikidata as their source of data. i.e. requests for permissions (RfP) from October 2012 to July 2018. However, early research on Wikidata’s community has already We analyzed these 683 bot requests by classifying them regarding shown that in addition to an active human editor community, bots activity focus, activity type, and source mentioned. Our results are responsible for the majority of edits (e.g., [10, 16, 17]). Contrary show that the majority of task requests deal with data additions to to Wikipedia, bots were massively used in the Wikidata community Wikidata from internal sources, especially from Wikipedia. How- from the beginning of the project; therefore, it seems they exhibit ever, we can also show the existing diversity of external sources an essential duty in Wikidata. Bots have been studied for some time used so far. Furthermore, we examined the reasons which caused in the context of Wikipedia (e.g. [3, 5, 9]), however, their role in the unsuccessful closing of RfPs. In some cases, the Wikidata com- the context of the Wikidata community is less explored. Concerns munity is reluctant to implement specific bots, even if they are were raised recently about the role of bots in Wikidata. The quality urgently needed because there is still no agreement in the commu- of bot-generated data, for example, and their influence on quality nity regarding the technical implementation. This study can serve control and knowledge diversity has been questioned [17]. as a foundation for studies that connect the approved tasks with This motivation led to the research presented in this paper, which the editing behavior of bots on Wikidata to understand the role of is guided by the question: What type of bot activities are approved bots better for quality control and knowledge diversity. by the Wikidata community? We are interested in understanding what type of tasks the Wikidata community permits to be performed KEYWORDS through bots, i.e. to automate. Wikidata, Bot, Task Approval As opposed to previous work [10, 16, 20] or [18] which was based primarily on actual bot edits, we analyzed the requests for ACM Reference Format: permission (RfP) process and the accompanying information in Mariam Farda-Sarbas, Hong Zhu, Marisa Frizzi Nest, and Claudia Müller- Wikidata. In the RfP process, a bot operator applies for task approval Birn. 2019. Approving Automation: Analyzing Requests for Permissions of for each task a bot is intended to carry out. The community then Bots in Wikidata. In The 15th International Symposium on Open Collaboration decides on each task. (OpenSym ’19), August 20–22, 2019, Skövde, Sweden. ACM, New York, NY, We collected all task descriptions from October 31, 2012, to July USA, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306446.3340833 01, 2018, and classified and analyzed them manually. Our results suggest that the community uses bots mainly to add data to Wiki- Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or data. These data originate primarily from Wikipedia. Furthermore, classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation the main reasons for unsuccessful RfPs are either the operators on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the themselves, because the specification of the task is insufficient, or author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or the community, who could not agree on the design of the technical republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]. implementation. The contributions of our research are as follows: OpenSym ’19, August 20–22, 2019, Skövde, Sweden © 2019 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM. 1 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Statistics. ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-6319-8/19/08...$15.00 2Community-created genome data portal available at www.wikigenomes.org. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306446.3340833 3An online map with an open license, available at https://www.openstreetmap.org. OpenSym ’19, August 20–22, 2019, Skövde, Sweden Farda-Sarbas et al. • We investigated bots from a community perspective, based that during this downtime, the quality control network performed on RfPs. slower but was still effective. • We provided a classification scheme for the categorization Another piece of research focuses on how "such tools transform of RfPs. the nature of editing and user interaction". Geiger shows "how a • We used our defined scheme to identify bot-requested tasks weak but pre-existing social norm was controversially reified into and data sources. a technological actor" [3]. He refers to the example of the Hager- • We analyzed how the community decides on RfPs and clas- manBot, which has been implemented to sign unsigned discussion sified the reasons for unsuccessful RfPs. entries in Wikipedia. Halfaker et al. [9] show that bots are not only • We developed a dataset of bots RfPs. responsible for the enforcement of existing guidelines on a larger In the following sections, we, firstly, present existing research scale, but also that their activities can have unexpected effects. The on bots in peer-production by focusing on Wikimedia projects number of reverts of newcomers’ edits, for example, has elevated, and how our work is built on them. We then explain our dataset while (surprisingly) the quality of those edits has stayed almost con- and classification approach. Next come the findings of the study, stant. Editors increasingly apply algorithmic tools for monitoring followed by a discussion of the results. We conclude this article by edits of newcomers. In 2010, 40 percent of rejections of newcomers’ highlighting possible directions for future research. contributions were based on these algorithmic tools [9]. This con- tradicts attempts of the community to engage more new editors. 2 BOTS IN PEER PRODUCTION Moreover, Geiger and Halfaker defined bots as "assemblages of code and a human developer" and show that bot’s activity is well aligned Very different bots populate peer production communities: These with Wikipedia’s policy environment [6]. bots collect information, execute functions independently, create The research suggests that bots are more critical to the suc- content or mimic humans. The effects of bots on peer production cess of the Wikipedia project than expected previously, despite the systems and our society are increasingly being discussed, for ex- reluctance of the Wikipedia community to allow bots at the begin- ample, when influencing voting behaviour [1] or imitating human ning [14]. Bots have a significant role in maintaining this text-based behaviour [13]. knowledge base, especially in fighting vandalism. As bots in Wiki- 4 Bots have been used in Wikipedia from early on . Wikidata’s data have their roots in Wikipedia, we expect to see similarities community has profited from these experiences when handling between bots in both peer production systems - Wikipedia and their bots. We review, therefore, existing insights into the bot com- Wikidata. Before we look closer to see if the same areas of use of munity on Wikipedia and building on that, highlight research on bot activities emerge from Wikidata, we give an overview of the Wikidata that considers bot activity. existing insights into the bot community in Wikidata. 2.1 Bots in Wikipedia Bots are software programs that automate tasks, usually repeti- 2.2 Bots in Wikidata tive or routine tasks which humans consider time-consuming and Wikidata inherited bots from its sister project Wikipedia and bots tedious (e.g. [3, 4, 16, 21]). They are operated and controlled by started editing Wikidata with its launch by linking Wikidata item humans. pages to their respective Wikipedia language pages. The current Wikipedia has developed a stable and increasingly active bot research on Wikidata bots shows that bots perform most of the community over the years, although, bots were not widely accepted edits in Wikidata [16, 20]. Steiner [20], in his research, aims to and trusted in the beginning [14].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Benchmark of Good Practices on New Business Models and Initiatives from and for Cultural Institutions
    International Benchmark of Good Practices on new Business Models and initiatives from and for cultural institutions June 2020 The European Commission support for the production of this document does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein Index Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 European Digital Treasures project ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Objectives of the document .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Category 1: Management .............................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipedia and Intermediary Immunity: Supporting Sturdy Crowd Systems for Producing Reliable Information Jacob Rogers Abstract
    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM O CTOBER 9 , 2017 Wikipedia and Intermediary Immunity: Supporting Sturdy Crowd Systems for Producing Reliable Information Jacob Rogers abstract. The problem of fake news impacts a massive online ecosystem of individuals and organizations creating, sharing, and disseminating content around the world. One effective ap- proach to addressing false information lies in monitoring such information through an active, engaged volunteer community. Wikipedia, as one of the largest online volunteer contributor communities, presents one example of this approach. This Essay argues that the existing legal framework protecting intermediary companies in the United States empowers the Wikipedia community to ensure that information is accurate and well-sourced. The Essay further argues that current legal efforts to weaken these protections, in response to the “fake news” problem, are likely to create perverse incentives that will harm volunteer engagement and confuse the public. Finally, the Essay offers suggestions for other intermediaries beyond Wikipedia to help monitor their content through user community engagement. introduction Wikipedia is well-known as a free online encyclopedia that covers nearly any topic, including both the popular and the incredibly obscure. It is also an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, an example of one of the largest crowd- sourced, user-generated content websites in the world. This user-generated model is supported by the Wikimedia Foundation, which relies on the robust intermediary liability immunity framework of U.S. law to allow the volunteer editor community to work independently. Volunteer engagement on Wikipedia provides an effective framework for combating fake news and false infor- mation. 358 wikipedia and intermediary immunity: supporting sturdy crowd systems for producing reliable information It is perhaps surprising that a project open to public editing could be highly reliable.
    [Show full text]
  • Jose's Geweldige Presentatie
    2012-06-11 Kulturrad Fagtag, Oslo Stel je een wereld voor waarin elke persoon vrije toegang heeft tot alle kennis. Dat is waar wij aan werken. Collaboration: why • Mission • Impact • Reach • Community • Non-pro • 1 + 1 = Community • Not a crowd • Structures • Rules of the game • Opportunity Image from: Tropenmuseum, CCBYSA ; CCNL/Hay Kranen,, CCBY ; Susana Morais, PD ; Mrjohncummings, CCBYSA ; Donaldytong, CCBYSA ;Mike Peel, CCBYSA; Content donations • Collection available through Wikimedia Commons • Reach • Context • Multiple languages • Digital restauration ... Image from: Tropenmuseum, CCBYSA Effective donations Higher reach. Nationaal Archief: 2000+ views vs 4 views per photo Copyright... Metadata Community Focus? Wiki Loves Art • Photo contest • 2009 Netherlands • 45 museums • 5400+ images • Van Gogh, Boijmans van Beuningen Image from: CCNL/Hay Kranen,, CCBY Wiki Loves … 1 month Community Easy upload Good overview Wiki Loves Monuments 2010: Netherlands 2011: Europe (18 countries) 2012: World (25+ countries) 1 month Lists of monuments Collaborations Local 2011 2012 Photos: Goodness Shamrock, Steven van der Wal Wiki Loves Monuments results Freely licensed photos: 165,000+ Familiarity: 4,000+ new uploaders, 7,500,000+ hits on project websites 18 countries 14 local events Wikipedia is editable: 85% expects to edit more Collaboration: 2000+ emails... Leiden Photo contests: lessons Easy Fun Nearby Wikipedia Results Edit-a-thon Themed meeting of Wikipedians to edit articles Something extra British Library, Teylers Museum Lock them in a
    [Show full text]
  • Wikimedia Conferentie Nederland 2012 Conferentieboek
    http://www.wikimediaconferentie.nl WCN 2012 Conferentieboek CC-BY-SA 9:30–9:40 Opening 9:45–10:30 Lydia Pintscher: Introduction to Wikidata — the next big thing for Wikipedia and the world Wikipedia in het onderwijs Technische kant van wiki’s Wiki-gemeenschappen 10:45–11:30 Jos Punie Ralf Lämmel Sarah Morassi & Ziko van Dijk Het gebruik van Wikimedia Commons en Wikibooks in Community and ontology support for the Wikimedia Nederland, wat is dat precies? interactieve onderwijsvormen voor het secundaire onderwijs 101wiki 11:45–12:30 Tim Ruijters Sandra Fauconnier Een passie voor leren, de Nederlandse wikiversiteit Projecten van Wikimedia Nederland in 2012 en verder Bliksemsessie …+discussie …+vragensessie Lunch 13:15–14:15 Jimmy Wales 14:30–14:50 Wim Muskee Amit Bronner Lotte Belice Baltussen Wikipedia in Edurep Bridging the Gap of Multilingual Diversity Open Cultuur Data: Een bottom-up initiatief vanuit de erfgoedsector 14:55–15:15 Teun Lucassen Gerard Kuys Finne Boonen Scholieren op Wikipedia Onderwerpen vinden met DBpedia Blijf je of ga je weg? 15:30–15:50 Laura van Broekhoven & Jan Auke Brink Jeroen De Dauw Jan-Bart de Vreede 15:55–16:15 Wetenschappelijke stagiairs vertalen onderzoek naar Structured Data in MediaWiki Wikiwijs in vergelijking tot Wikiversity en Wikibooks Wikipedia–lemma 16:20–17:15 Prijsuitreiking van Wiki Loves Monuments Nederland 17:20–17:30 Afsluiting 17:30–18:30 Borrel Inhoudsopgave Organisatie 2 Voorwoord 3 09:45{10:30: Lydia Pintscher 4 13:15{14:15: Jimmy Wales 4 Wikipedia in het onderwijs 5 11:00{11:45: Jos Punie
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Contributions to Wikipedia from Tor
    Are anonymity-seekers just like everybody else? An analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from Tor Chau Tran Kaylea Champion Andrea Forte Department of Computer Science & Engineering Department of Communication College of Computing & Informatics New York University University of Washington Drexel University New York, USA Seatle, USA Philadelphia, USA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Benjamin Mako Hill Rachel Greenstadt Department of Communication Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Washington New York University Seatle, USA New York, USA [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—User-generated content sites routinely block contri- butions from users of privacy-enhancing proxies like Tor because of a perception that proxies are a source of vandalism, spam, and abuse. Although these blocks might be effective, collateral damage in the form of unrealized valuable contributions from anonymity seekers is invisible. One of the largest and most important user-generated content sites, Wikipedia, has attempted to block contributions from Tor users since as early as 2005. We demonstrate that these blocks have been imperfect and that thousands of attempts to edit on Wikipedia through Tor have been successful. We draw upon several data sources and analytical techniques to measure and describe the history of Tor editing on Wikipedia over time and to compare contributions from Tor users to those from other groups of Wikipedia users. Fig. 1. Screenshot of the page a user is shown when they attempt to edit the Our analysis suggests that although Tor users who slip through Wikipedia article on “Privacy” while using Tor. Wikipedia’s ban contribute content that is more likely to be reverted and to revert others, their contributions are otherwise similar in quality to those from other unregistered participants and to the initial contributions of registered users.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Eastman
    Wiki Loves Monuments: The world's largest photography competition is now open! Photograph a historic site, learn more about our history, and win prizes. Crystal Eastman From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Crystal Eastman Crystal Eastman, feminist and political activist Crystal Catherine Eastman Born June 25, 1881 Marlborough, Massachusetts Died July 8, 1928 (aged 47) Nationality American Occupation Lawyer Feminism, socialism, Congressional Union for Woman Suffrage, The Liberator, and as a co-founder of both Known for the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom and American Union Against Militarism Spouse(s) Wallace Benedict, Walter Fuller Children Jeffrey Fuller and Annis Fuller Samuel Elijah Eastman and Annis Parent(s) Bertha Ford Relatives Max Eastman (brother) Crystal Catherine Eastman (June 25, 1881 – July 8, 1928)[1] was an American lawyer, antimilitarist, feminist, socialist, and journalist. She is best remembered as a leader in the fight for women's suffrage, as a co-founder and co-editor with her brother Max Eastman of the radical arts and politics magazine The Liberator, co-founder of the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom, and co-founder in 1920 of the American Civil Liberties Union. In 2000 she was inducted into the National Women's Hall of Fame in Seneca Falls, New York. Contents 1 Early life and education 2 Social efforts 3 Emancipation 4 Peace efforts 5 Marriage and family o 5.1 Post-War o 5.2 Death 6 Legacy 7 Work o 7.1 Papers o 7.2 Publications 8 Footnotes 9 See also o 9.1 People o 9.2 Political groups o 9.3 Other 10 Additional reading 11 External links Early life and education Crystal Eastman was born in Marlborough, Massachusetts, on June 25, 1881, the third of four children.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiki Loves Monuments 2011: the Experience in Spain and Reflections Regarding the Diffusion of Cultural Heritage
    Universitat Oberta de Catalunya The Humanities in the Digital Era http://digithum.uoc.edu Dossier ˝Academic research into Wikipedia˝ Wiki Loves Monuments 2011: the experience in Spain and reflections regarding the diffusion of cultural heritage Emilio José Rodríguez Posada Computer Engineering Bachelor degree and predoctoral student (University of Cadiz) [email protected] Ángel Gonzalez Berdasco Computer Engineering Bachelor degree (University of Oviedo) [email protected] Jorge A. Sierra Canduela President of Wikimedia Spain Degrees in Chemistry and Theology and diploma in Therapeutic Pedagogy Secondary school teacher [email protected] Santiago Navarro Sanz Member of Wikimedia Spain Student of the degrees in Chemical Engineering, Chemistry (Jaume I University of Castellón) and History (UNED) [email protected] Tomás Saorín Lecturer at the Faculty of Communication and Documentation (University of Murcia) [email protected] Submission date: February, 2012 Accepted date: April, 2012 Published in: May, 2012 Abstract Wikipedia came into being in cyberspace. Its early years were marked by asynchronous work by users located all over the world who hardly ever related on a personal level outside the net. With time, some of the volunteers met at what were called wikimeetups, encounters initially aimed at tightening bonds which did not bring about any direct improvement to the project content. Face-to-face initiatives later took place that involved not just volunteers but also cultural entities. The most recent event and the one with the greatest impact was Wiki Loves Monuments 2011, a competition to photograph monuments in 18 European countries, including Spain. The high level of participation led to 160,000 photographs of monuments being taken, with Spain occupying the third place in terms of number of photographs.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Or Social Movement? Piotr Konieczny
    Wikipedia: Community or social movement? Piotr Konieczny To cite this version: Piotr Konieczny. Wikipedia: Community or social movement?. Interface: a journal for and about social movements, 2009. hal-01580966 HAL Id: hal-01580966 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01580966 Submitted on 4 Sep 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Interface: a journal for and about social movements Article Volume 1 (2): 212 - 232 (November 2009) Konieczny, Wikipedia Wikipedia: community or social movement? Piotr Konieczny Abstract In recent years a new realm for study of political and sociological phenomena has appeared, the Internet, contributing to major changes in our societies during its relatively brief existence. Within cyberspace, organizations whose existence is increasingly tied to this virtual world are of interest to social scientists. This study will analyze the community of one of the largest online organizations, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia with millions of volunteer members. Wikipedia was never meant to be a community, yet it most certainly has become one. This study asks whether it is something even more –whether it is an expression of online activism, and whether it can be seen as a social movement organization, related to one or more of the Internet-centered social movements industries (in particular, the free and open-source software movement industry).
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Undisclosed Paid Editing in Wikipedia
    Detecting Undisclosed Paid Editing in Wikipedia Nikesh Joshi, Francesca Spezzano, Mayson Green, and Elijah Hill Computer Science Department, Boise State University Boise, Idaho, USA [email protected] {nikeshjoshi,maysongreen,elijahhill}@u.boisestate.edu ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION Wikipedia, the free and open-collaboration based online ency- Wikipedia is the free online encyclopedia based on the principle clopedia, has millions of pages that are maintained by thousands of of open collaboration; for the people by the people. Anyone can volunteer editors. As per Wikipedia’s fundamental principles, pages add and edit almost any article or page. However, volunteers should on Wikipedia are written with a neutral point of view and main- follow a set of guidelines when editing Wikipedia. The purpose tained by volunteer editors for free with well-defned guidelines in of Wikipedia is “to provide the public with articles that summa- order to avoid or disclose any confict of interest. However, there rize accepted knowledge, written neutrally and sourced reliably” 1 have been several known incidents where editors intentionally vio- and the encyclopedia should not be considered as a platform for late such guidelines in order to get paid (or even extort money) for advertising and self-promotion. Wikipedia’s guidelines strongly maintaining promotional spam articles without disclosing such. discourage any form of confict-of-interest (COI) editing and require In this paper, we address for the frst time the problem of identi- editors to disclose any COI contribution. Paid editing is a form of fying undisclosed paid articles in Wikipedia. We propose a machine COI editing and refers to editing Wikipedia (in the majority of the learning-based framework using a set of features based on both cases for promotional purposes) in exchange for compensation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Wikipedia Jansn
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system Niederer, S.; van Dijck, J. DOI 10.1177/1461444810365297 Publication date 2010 Document Version Submitted manuscript Published in New Media & Society Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Niederer, S., & van Dijck, J. (2010). Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media & Society, 12(8), 1368-1387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365297 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:27 Sep 2021 Full Title: Wisdom of the Crowd or Technicity of Content? Wikipedia as a socio-technical system Authors: Sabine Niederer and José van Dijck Sabine Niederer, University of Amsterdam, Turfdraagsterpad 9, 1012 XT Amsterdam, The Netherlands [email protected] José van Dijck, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 210, 1012 VT Amsterdam, The Netherlands [email protected] Authors’ Biographies Sabine Niederer is PhD candidate in Media Studies at the University of Amsterdam, and member of the Digital Methods Initiative, Amsterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Point of View: a Wikipedia Reader
    w ikipedia pedai p edia p Wiki CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader 2 CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW 3 Critical Point of View: A Wikipedia Reader Editors: Geert Lovink and Nathaniel Tkacz Editorial Assistance: Ivy Roberts, Morgan Currie Copy-Editing: Cielo Lutino CRITICAL Design: Katja van Stiphout Cover Image: Ayumi Higuchi POINT OF VIEW Printer: Ten Klei Groep, Amsterdam Publisher: Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam 2011 A Wikipedia ISBN: 978-90-78146-13-1 Reader EDITED BY Contact GEERT LOVINK AND Institute of Network Cultures NATHANIEL TKACZ phone: +3120 5951866 INC READER #7 fax: +3120 5951840 email: [email protected] web: http://www.networkcultures.org Order a copy of this book by sending an email to: [email protected] A pdf of this publication can be downloaded freely at: http://www.networkcultures.org/publications Join the Critical Point of View mailing list at: http://www.listcultures.org Supported by: The School for Communication and Design at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (Hogeschool van Amsterdam DMCI), the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) in Bangalore and the Kusuma Trust. Thanks to Johanna Niesyto (University of Siegen), Nishant Shah and Sunil Abraham (CIS Bangalore) Sabine Niederer and Margreet Riphagen (INC Amsterdam) for their valuable input and editorial support. Thanks to Foundation Democracy and Media, Mondriaan Foundation and the Public Library Amsterdam (Openbare Bibliotheek Amsterdam) for supporting the CPOV events in Bangalore, Amsterdam and Leipzig. (http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/cpov/) Special thanks to all the authors for their contributions and to Cielo Lutino, Morgan Currie and Ivy Roberts for their careful copy-editing.
    [Show full text]
  • ORES Scalable, Community-Driven, Auditable, Machine Learning-As-A-Service in This Presentation, We Lay out Ideas
    ORES Scalable, community-driven, auditable, machine learning-as-a-service In this presentation, we lay out ideas... This is a conversation starter, not a conversation ender. We put forward our best ideas and thinking based on our partial perspectives. We look forward to hearing yours. Outline - Opportunities and fears of artificial intelligence - ORES: A break-away success - The proposal & asks We face a significant challenge... There’s been a significant decline in the number of active contributors to the English-language Wikipedia. Contributors have fallen by 40% over the past eight years, to about 30,000. Hamstrung by our own success? “Research indicates that the problem may be rooted in Wikipedians’ complex bureaucracy and their often hard-line responses to newcomers’ mistakes, enabled by semi-automated tools that make deleting new changes easy.” - MIT Technology Review (December 1, 2015) It’s the revert-new-editors’-first-few-edits-and-alienate-them problem. Imagine an algorithm that can... ● Judge whether an edit was made in good faith, so that new editors don’t have their first contributions wiped out. ● Detect bad-faith edits and help fight vandalism. Machine learning and prediction have the power to support important work in open contribution projects like Wikipedia at massive scales. But it’s far from a no-brainer. Quite the opposite. On the bright side, Machine learning has the potential to help our projects scale by reducing the workload of editors and enhancing the value of our content. by Luiz Augusto Fornasier Milani under CC BY-SA 4.0, from Wikimedia Commons. On the dark side, AIs have the potential to perpetuate biases and silence voices in novel and insidious ways.
    [Show full text]