D O N a U R E G I O N E N Jointly for Our Common Future the Spatial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

D O N a U R E G I O N E N Jointly for Our Common Future the Spatial donauregionen+ Programme co-funded by the EUROPEAN UNION danube regions analysis 2009 - 2012 The Spatial Development of Interregional Co-operation in the Danube Space GS HRSS reg i onen donau jointly for our common future 5 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bratislavský kraj General Information Human Resources Demographic situation The number of inhabitants in the region to the date December 31, 2006 has been 606 753. During the period 1991 – 2006 the number of inhabitants increased in Bratislava County from 606 351 people to 606 753. From the year 2002 the number of natural population have declining trend and in the year 2006 the natural population growth was recorded (68 people). In Bratislava County was observed the total growth of population 3 054 people. Popultion density in Bratislava County reached in 2006 the value 296 people on 1 sq. km. The portion of youngest population in the year 2006 in Bratislava County was (13,0 %). Educational structure Within Slovakia regions Bratislava County has the highest educational level of population, what is related to the best high school network in this region and at the same time with the graduates’ best chances to succeed in employment process. In Bratislava County is 31,7% rate of high educated population (aged 25-64). Labour market The economically active population are people aged 15 that belongs among working people in civil sector, unemployed or member of armed sector. In the year 2006, at the regional level, the share of economically active population from the total population number represented 53,4%. The employment rate of people aged 15 + has reached 60,6% in Bratislava County in the year 2006. Unemployment rate in 2006 was recorded on the level 2,29%. Settlement Structure Development trends The settlement structure is characterized with relatively proportional spreading of middle large cities on the whole region with the dominant position of the Slovak Republic capital city Bratislava. The city with more than 100 000 inhabitance is only one in the region; it is Bratislava (426 000 inhabitance) which is also the largest city in the whole Slovak part of the region. The region has relatively good position toward the neighboring countries, from which development of the biggest regional cities benefited mainly. A development in these cities gives the development opportunities also to other hinterlands. Roles of importance of the towns In term of European conditions is the most important city as the centre of international importance the capital of SR Bratislava and its agglomeration. Agglomerations areas and development axes The territory of analyzed region can be characterized in term of settlement structure as a territory with most developed agglomeration within Slovak Republic. It is concerned to Bratislava-Trnava agglomeration around capital city Bratislava with connection to Trnava city and also Nitra agglomeration, which is, in essence, interconnected with Bratislava-Trnava agglomeration. In discussed area we can expect within the individual agglomerations further development of suburbanization connected to trends of concentrated de-concentration around most important towns. 6 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Interregional cooperation Potential interconnection of settlement structure of SR to other countries and their settlement structures is expressed by basic conception idea shown in picture from Slovak Spatial Development Perspective 2001 – International context of settlement centers of SR. Within cross-border territory creates formal and informal organizations. One of formal forms of trans-boundary cooperation is within the frame of established euroregions. In the border territory following euroregions occurred: Euroregion „Pomoravie“ (with Austria and Czech Republic). As a common association for publicity and support of economic development of cross-border region an association CENTROPE was established. Its participants are Slovakia, Austria, Hungary and Czech Republic. An information system VITEC was created as a joint database system for information between Bratislava and Vienna towns. Border and transborder towns within the region are practically all towns along borders, first of all those, which are in immediate vicinity of borders as Bratislava, Malacky, Senec. Living standards Based on the data of Statistical Office SR, there has been 332 permanently inhabited dwellings on 1 000 inhabitance in the evaluated region in the year 2001. In the scope of the region, the highest number of dwellings per 1 000 inhabitance was in Bratislava County. The regional average is 365 dwellings per 1 000 inhabitance. Indicators of Settlement Infrastructure and Human Resources Indicator 1996 2001 2005 2008 Number of dwellings per 1 000 inhabitants 377,69 406,31 424,32 439,81 Share of university students per 1 000 69,24 82,63 100,55 122,91 inhabitants Regional vitality index 161,44 124,43 107,99 102,38 7 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Trnavský kraj General Information Human Resources Demographic situation The number of inhabitance in the region to the date December 31, 2006 has been 555 075 people in Trnava County. During the period 1991 – 2006, the increase has occurred in Trnava County, where the population raised from 541 992 in the year 1991 to 555 075 inhabitance until the year 2006, i.e. increase by 13 083 people. The population density is 134 inhabitance/sq. km in Trnava County. The population age structure and its processes of formation can be considered as a demographic phenomenon with relatively high complexity degree. The population age structure formation and its changes are referring to all inhabitance. Development of basic population processes for instance natality, mortality and migration movements are reflected in the age structure. On the other side, the age structure of each population can significantly influence levels of many population phenomenon and processes. Educational structure The population educational structure is a reflection of a society development degree, its economic and social forwardness. The education of population mainly depends on the educational system of society. The evaluation of population educational structure is based on the data from population census as only and relatively most correct information about this population structure. During the last population, houses and dwellings census as of May 26, 2001, the education was surveyed based on the highest finished educational level. At the regional level, the share of population aged 25-64 with high education represented 18,2%, the share of population aged 18-64 with highest secondary education level was 75,5% and the share of population aged 19-64 without education was 0,4%. Labour market The economically active population are people aged 15 that belongs among working people in civil sector, unemployed or member of armed sector. In the year 2006, at the regional level, the share of economically active population from the total population number represented 50,2%. In Trnava County it was 51,1%. The employment rate, that is computed as the portion of working people aged 15+, potentially persons aged 15- 64 and number of inhabitance aged 15+, potentially persons aged 15-64 are gained from the Statistical Office of SR but only data to the NUTS 3 level. The employment rate of people aged 15+ has indicated 51,2% in the year 2006 in the Slovak Republic and the employment rate of persons aged 15-64 is 59,4%, what is below the EU average. The employment rate of people aged 15 + has reached 56,4 in the year 2006. Settlement Structure Development trends The settlement structure is characterized with relatively proportional spreading of middle large cities on the whole region with the dominant position. The region has relatively good position toward the neighboring countries, from which development of the biggest regional cities benefited mainly. A development in these cities gives the development opportunities also to other hinterlands. However, this development is not proportional. In the region development, the main role plays the geomorphologic determinateness. The largest lowland with the best farmlands of Slovakia is located in this region. Main part of the region was and still is the leading area of an agricultural production. This fact together with restructuring of the whole agriculture has an influence on the dynamics of another development in its parts, where agricultural production is a dominant economic factor. In these parts of the region, the existing small and middle large cities play more important role in the inhabitance stabilization and in the dynamics of agricultural development. 8 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Roles of importance of the towns According to European model for polycentric development Trnava county belongs to Functional Urban Areas (FUA). Agglomerations areas and development axes The territory of analyzed region can be characterized in term of settlement structure as a territory with most developed agglomeration within Slovak Republic. It is concerned to Bratislava-Trnava agglomeration around capital city Bratislava with connection to Trnava city. Interregional cooperation Potential interconnection of settlement structure of SR to other countries and their settlement structures is expressed by basic
Recommended publications
  • Аnnual Report 2019
    АNNUAL REPORT 2019 5 MESSAGE FROM THE MANAGEMENT 29 Market share and position of CCB Plc 6 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS AS AT 31.12.2019 31 Income Statement 7 TODAY 32 An analysis of the assets and liabilities 8 BRIEF HISTORY 36 APPENDIX №1: BRANCH NETWORK 11 MANAGERIAL TEAM 38 APPENDIX №2: NOSTRO ACCOUNTS 12 SHARE CAPITAL AND SHAREHOLDERS 41 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT 13 Client structure 51 ANNUAL SEPARATE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 14 Retail banking 22 International payments 24 Financial markets CONTENTS 25 Information technology 26 Personnel 29 FINANCIAL REVIEW FOR 2019 2 3 MESSAGE FROM THE MANAGEMENT Ladies and Gentlemen, We, the Executive Directors and Procurator of Central Cooperative Bank Plc, would like to use this opportunity to inform you about our achievements and accolades in 2019. Central Cooperative Bank Plc is a universal commercial bank with a pronounced focus on retail banking. As at 31.12.2019 the Bank assets are BGN 6,1 billion, shareholders’ equity amounts to BGN 568 million and the net profit is BGN 34,2 million. Last year was our 12th year as a member of the European Union and we ranked on the 8th place among Bulgarian banks in terms of total assets. Among our goals for 2020 are: increasing the total assets of the Bank, respectively the market share; developing and defending the leadership position in the use of the most contemporary channels of distributing the bank products; streamlining and constant adaptation of the client model of the operative organization with the aim of maintaining the high quality of the bank servicing;
    [Show full text]
  • Navigation Map of Bulgaria Including Offroadmap by Offroad-Bulgaria.Com Version 2021 Q1
    Navigation Map of Bulgaria Including OFFRoadMap by OFFRoad-Bulgaria.com Version 2021 Q2 The purpose of this map is to provide accessible, accurate and up-to-date information for your GPS devices. Despite all efforts made by the creators to achieve this goal, the roads and the data included in this digital map are intended to be used as guidance only and should not be used solely for navigation. The creators of this map make no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the map data. In no event will the creators of this map be liable for any damages whatsoever, including but not limited to loss of revenue or profit, lost or damaged data, and expenses, arising in any way from or consequential upon the use of, or the inability to use this digital map. Contents: - Registering your map - Usage details - OFRM Geotrade 2021 Q2 variants - Coverage >>>>> REGISTRATION <<<<< To register your OFRM Geotrade map, please visit out website www.karta.bg. Click on “Create profile” in the top right corner of the screen and create your personal account. When done, the Support page will load automatically. Click on the button “Register OFRM Geotrade” and enter the 25-symbol map serial number and GPS model to activate your map’s update subscription (if your map includes one). To obtain the 25-symbol serial number, connect your GPS device to your computer via USB cable. If you have a GPS device with preloaded OFRM map, you will find the serial number in file “serial.txt” in the root folder of your device’s base memory or in the file “gmapsupp.unl” in folder “Garmin” (or folder “Map” on the newer models of the nüvi series and the new Drive series) of your device’s base memory.
    [Show full text]
  • O C a L a E L S a E
    l o c a l a E L S A e. V. n d & n e w s 42/43 s Grassland and Soils Grasland und Böden o Project-Report: • SONDAR INFORMATION N° 3 i Soil Strategy Network in the Danube Region l locallocal land land && soil soil news news 42/43 no.42/43 II/12 II/12 The Bulletin of the European Land and Soil Alliance (ELSA) e.V. c o n t e n t / i n h a l t e d i t o r i a l grassland and soils / 3–21 grasland und böden Zur Vielfalt von Grasland • Grassland and Soils – a global view Geschätzte Mitglieder und Freunde des Boden-Bündnisses • Grasses and Grassland: Biology – Grasland ist ein allgemein gehaltener Begriff für all jene Vegetationstypen, Utilization – Development in denen Gräser vorherrschen. Im Wesentlichen unterscheidet man zwischen • Grassland Soils – properties and functions natürlichen Vegetationstypen wie Steppen, Savannen, Trockenrasen, Moore • Salzwiesen, Dünen und Röhrichte – und solchen, die als Kulturgrasland (Grünland) vom Menschen mitgeprägt Pflanzengesellschaften am Extremstandort sind. Beim Kulturgrasland sind sehr unterschiedliche Agrarökosysteme zwischen Land und Meer entstanden, abhängig von der Bewirtschaftung durch Beweidung und/oder • LIFE Nature Project “Alkaline Fens in Bran- Mahd, von der Nutzungsintensität und Nährstoffzufuhr, vom Klima und den denburg” – Good news for fen restoration Bodenverhältnissen. Etwa ein Viertel der globalen Landfläche oder mehr als • Die CoEvolution von Gras und Grasern und zwei Drittel des landwirtschaftlich genutzten Bodens umfassen Grasland. ihre Bedeutung für die Potenziale nachhalti- Aus Sicht der Nutzung zählen zum Grasland insbesondere jene Flächen, – so- ger Land- und Weidewirtschaft genannte Grenzertragsböden –, welche aus natürlichen und wirtschaftlichen • Urban Grasslands: Between Nostalgia, Con- Gründen nicht anders genutzt werden können, zum Beispiel im Voralpen- trol of Nature, and Wildness und Alpengebiet.
    [Show full text]
  • M E M O R a N D
    UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT/ BULGARIA Final Report Bulgaria Municipal Energy Efficiency Project Project No. MAARD#D383005 Contract No. 183-C-00-03-00101-00 Prepared by: MWH Americas, Inc. 175 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604 and Electrotek Concepts, Inc. 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite 323 Arlington, VA 22201 May 31, 2004 Table of Contents General Information............................................................................................................ 1 MEEP Tasks........................................................................................................................ 1 Tasks Accomplishment....................................................................................................... 2 Task 1. Cooperation with all stakeholders involved in bankable project identification, development and financing............................................................................................. 2 Task 2. Enhanced business relationships with UBB and FIB......................................... 6 Task 4. Identification, development and financial deal structuring with UBB and FIB under the DCA Guarantees ............................................................................................. 8 Task 5. Project implementation and monitoring........................................................... 11 Task 6. Continue and enhance development of project financing with FIB and other lenders and investors....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Do Public Fund Windfalls Increase Corruption? Evidence from a Natural Disaster Elena Nikolovaa Nikolay Marinovb 68131 Mannheim A5-6, Germany October 5, 2016
    Do Public Fund Windfalls Increase Corruption? Evidence from a Natural Disaster Elena Nikolovaa Nikolay Marinovb 68131 Mannheim A5-6, Germany October 5, 2016 Abstract We show that unexpected financial windfalls increase corruption in local govern- ment. Our analysis uses a new data set on flood-related transfers, and the associated spending infringements, which the Bulgarian central government distributed to mu- nicipalities following torrential rains in 2004 and 2005. Using information from the publicly available audit reports we are able to build a unique objective index of cor- ruption. We exploit the quasi-random nature of the rainfall shock (conditional on controls for ground flood risk) to isolate exogenous variation in the amount of funds received by each municipality. Our results imply that a 10 % increase in the per capita amount of disbursed funds leads to a 9.8% increase in corruption. We also present suggestive evidence that more corrupt mayors anticipated punishment by voters and dropped out of the next election race. Our results highlight the governance pitfalls of non-tax transfers, such as disaster relief or assistance from international organizations, even in moderately strong democracies. Keywords: corruption, natural disasters, governance JEL codes: D73, H71, P26 aResearch Fellow, Central European Labour Studies Institute, Slovakia and associated researcher, IOS Regensburg, Germany. Email: [email protected]. We would like to thank Erik Bergl¨of,Rikhil Bhav- nani, Simeon Djankov, Sergei Guriev, Stephan Litschig, Ivan Penkov, Grigore Pop-Eleches, Sandra Sequeira and conference participants at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the European Public Choice Society, Groningen, the 2015 American Political Science Association, San Francisco and seminar participants at Brunel, King's College workshop on corruption, and LSE for useful comments, and Erik Bergl¨ofand Stefka Slavova for help with obtaining Bulgarian rainfall data.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria
    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Regional Development the Secretariat
    COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT THE SECRETARIAT October 2008 REPORT of the Committee on Regional Development's Delegation to Bulgaria from 30 September to 2 October 2008 European Parliament - Committee on Regional Development - The Secretariat SUMMARY Visit to Bulgaria to meet with Government Ministers and officials as well as the leaders of local administrations responsible for regional Subject development projects. Under the 2006 regulations the whole of Bulgaria qualifies for assistance under the Convergence objective. The field missions had the following main objectives: - To discuss with Ministers, relevant officials and local authorities the future implementation of the Regional development Operational Programme and sectoral programmes as well as to discuss with them any problems they may have. Main objectives - To acquaint members of the delegation with the specific problems of Bulgaria and see in situ some successful projects executed with pre-accession funds and discuss the implementation of operational programmes which are just starting up. Date 30 September to 02 October 2008 Sofia, Gorna Orjahovica, Arbanasi, Balchik, Varna Places Chairman Gerardo Galleote, Chair of the Regional Development Committee. The list of participants is attached in the annex. 2 of 11 European Parliament - Committee on Regional Development - The Secretariat BACKGROUND On the initiative of the Bulgarian Vice President of the Committee on Regional Development Mr Evgeni KIRILOV (PSE), the committee decided to send a delegation to Bulgaria. It was the last out of three delegation trips of the REGI Committee scheduled for 2008. Bulgaria is of particular interest to the Members of the Regional Development Committee for a number of reasons: Together with Romania, Bulgaria is the first Balkan country to join the European Union in the latest phase of the ongoing enlargement process.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropogenic Disasters on Bulgarian Territory: Chemical Accidents on Land and at Sea
    https://doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2021272.3718 Journal of IMAB Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers). 2021 Apr-Jun;27(2) ISSN: 1312-773X https://www.journal-imab-bg.org Review article ANTHROPOGENIC DISASTERS ON BULGARIAN TERRITORY: CHEMICAL ACCIDENTS ON LAND AND AT SEA Maria Panteleeva1, Rositsa Chamova2, Nikolina Radeva1, Hristianna Romanova1 1) Department of Disaster Medicine and Maritime Medicine, Public Health Fac- ulty, Medical University Varna, Bulgaria. 2) Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Public Health Faculty, Medical University - Varna, Bulgaria. ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Natural and anthropogenic disasters become more There has been an increase of the natural and anthro- frequent worldwide. As technology advances, the risk of pogenic disasters and catastrophes worldwide in the last major industrial accidents increases. Often accidents in the few years. They are an inevitable part of our daily lives – chemical and oil industry, in agriculture, or during trans- being present in the news and social media, on radio and portation, lead to mass poisoning and extensive environ- television. As technology advances, the risk of major in- mental pollution. The particularities of the medical sup- dustrial accidents increases. There is a growing trend, es- port in case of such chemical incidents are challenging the pecially in chemical plants’ breakdown. Many accidents healthcare system. involving toxic chemicals have also been reported in Bul- The article aims to analyze the chemical accidents garia. [1] Every year, over 100 industrial accidents are reg- and the measures taken to reduce their effect in Bulgaria istered on the country’s territory, with an increasing ten- and in the Black sea aquatory.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Program Democracy
    Democracy Network Program DemNet II: Building Civil Society in Bulgaria Final Report Democracy Network Program DemNet II: Building Civil Society in Bulgaria 1998-2002 FINAL REPORT TO THE U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Cooperative Agreement No. 181-A-00-98-00320-00 Institute for Sustainable Communities 535 Stone Cutters Way, Montpelier, VT 05602 USA Phone 802-229-2900 | Fax 802-229-2919 [email protected] | www.iscvt.org April 2003 Photos, front and back inside covers: Bulgarian landscapes; next page: DemNet-supported activities of SO partners and NGOs working for positive change in Bulgaria. Table of Contents I. Executive Summary • 6 II. The Context • 8 III. Program Design & Goals • 9 IV. Strengthening the Capacity of SO Partners • 11 • SELECTING SUPPORT ORGANIZATION PARTNERS • ORGANIZATIONAL STRENGTHENING • DEEPENING PROGRAM IMPACT • KEY OUTCOMES IN DEMNET’S FUNCTIONAL AREAS V. SO Partner Performance Stories • 22 VI. Supporting a Vibrant NGO Sector & Strengthening Civil Society in Bulgaria • 24 • TARGETING UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS & IMPROVING SOCIAL SAFETY NETS • CREATING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY • NETWORKING & COALITION BUILDING FOR SUPPORT & SUSTAINABILITY • STRENGTHENING OUTREACH & PUBLIC RELATIONS • INCREASING CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN POLICY DIALOGUE VII. Lessons Learned • 27 VIII. Conclusion • 29 IX. Attachments A: DEMNET SO PARTNER PUBLICATION B: SO PARTNER SUMMARIES C: ORGANIZATIONAL STRENGTHENING & PERFORMANCE MONITORING COMPONENTS D: SERVICE QUALITY REVIEW REPORT E: DONOR SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY F: ENGAGE INITIATIVE REPORT G: TRAVEL NOTES PUBLICATION (ENGAGE INITIATIVE) H: VOICES FOR CHANGE PUBLICATION I: ADVOCACY INITIATIVE REPORT J: LEADING LIGHTS PUBLICATION K: SUMMARY OF NGO GRANTEES L: SENSE OF EMPOWERMENT VIDEO Acknowledgements The success of any project is in the hands of many people—the SO partners, the capable and dedicated ISC staff in Bulgaria, many excellent consultants who supported the program, and the Bulgaria USAID mission that provided sound support and counsel at critical junctures.
    [Show full text]
  • Srpsko Zidno Slikarstvo
    ТАТЈАНА СТАРОДУБЦЕВ СРПСКО ЗИДНО СЛИКАРСТВО У ЗЕМЉАМА ЛАЗАРЕВИЋА И БРАНКОВИЋА Татјана А. Стародубцев СРПСКО ЗИДНО СЛИКАРСТВО У ЗЕМЉАМА ЛАЗАРЕВИЋА И БРАНКОВИЋА Књиге I и II Издавач Универзитет у Београду, Филозофски факултет, Институт за историју уметности Чика Љубина 18–20, Београд 11000, Србија www.f.bg.ac.rs Студије 12 За издавача Проф. др Војислав Јелић, декан Филозофског факултета Уредник Проф. др Миодраг Марковић Рецензенти Проф. др Бранислав Тодић Проф. др Миодраг Марковић Лектура и коректура Мирјана Карановић Превод резимеа Маргита Ивановић Ликовно-графичка обрада Ирена Ђаковић Припрема и штампа Досије студио, Београд Тираж 300 ISBN 978-86-6427-022-9 Штампање ове књиге потпомогло је Министарство просвете, науке и технолошког развоја Републике Србије ТАТЈАНА А. СТАРОДУБЦЕВ СРПСКО ЗИДНО СЛИКАРСТВО У ЗЕМЉАМА ЛАЗАРЕВИЋА И БРАНКОВИЋА Књиге I и II Београд 2016. САДРЖАЈ КЊИГЕ I СПИСАК СКРАЋЕНИЦА . 7–25 ДОСАДАШЊА ИСТРАЖИВАЊА. 27–54 КТИТОРИ . 55–124 I ЗАДУЖБИНАРСТВО И КТИТОРИ У ДОБА ЛАЗАРЕВИЋА И БРАНКОВИЋА. 55–98 ИЗГЛЕД ГРАЂЕВИНА СТАРО НАСЛЕЂЕ И НОВИ ОБИЧАЈИ . 56 СВЕДОЧАНСТВА ОСНИВАЧКИХ ПОВЕЉА И БРИГА О СВЕТОГОРСКИМ МАНАСТИРИМА И ЗАДУЖБИНАМА НЕМАЊИЋА . 57 ЗАДУЖБИНЕ ВЛАДАРА И ЊИХОВИХ СРОДНИКА. 65 ПРИДВОРНЕ ЦРКВЕ У ПРЕСТОНИЦАМА. 67 СЕДИШТА ПАТРИЈАРШИЈЕ И МИТРОПОЛИЈА И ЕПИСКОПИЈА . 69 ВЛАДАР КАО ЗАШТИТНИК МОНАШТВА. 71 ЗАДУЖБИНЕ ДУХОВНИХ ЛИЦА . 73 ЗАДУЖБИНЕ ВЛАСТЕЛЕ . 75 ЦРКВЕ У ГРАДОВИМА И СЕЛИМА . 81 МАНАСТИРИ И ЦРКВЕ ДАНАС НЕПОЗНАТИХ КТИТОРА. 85 ПОГЛЕД НА МЕСТО КТИТОРА НА ДРУШТВЕНОЈ ЛЕСТВИЦИ И ЊИХОВЕ ЗАДУЖБИНЕ . 92 ЗАДУЖБИНА КАО МЕСТО ВЕЧНОГ ПОКОЈА . 93 ЗАКЉУЧНА РАЗМАТРАЊА . 97 II СЛИКА ВЛАДАРА И ЊИХОВИХ ПОДАНИКА . 98–124 ПОРТРЕТИ СУВЕРЕНА И ЧЛАНОВА ВЛАДАРСКЕ ПОРОДИЦЕ . 98 Самосталне и заједничке слике . 112 Под благословом с неба .
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste
    Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Develonment Europe and Central Asia Region 32051 BULGARIA Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION PriorityPublic Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste *t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized IC- - ; s - o Fk - L - -. Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized May 2004 - "Wo BULGARIA ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste May 2004 Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Europe and Central Asia Region Report No. 27770 - BUL Thefindings, interpretationsand conclusions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Coverphoto is kindly provided by the external communication office of the World Bank County Office in Bulgaria. The report is printed on 30% post consumer recycledpaper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................... i Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................... ii Summary ..................................................................... iiM Introduction.iii Wastewater.iv InstitutionalIssues .xvi Recommendations........... xvii Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Part I: The Strategic Settings for
    [Show full text]