Re-Use of Roman Stone in London City-Walls

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Re-Use of Roman Stone in London City-Walls ROMAN ORNAMENTAL STONES IN NORTH- ROMAN ORNAMENTAL STONES IN WESTERN EUROPE NORTH-WESTERN EUROPE Catherine Coquelet, Guido Creemers, Roland Dreesen & Éric Goemaere 8 3 o n e During Roman times, various rock types have been selected for the manufacturing i g o of religious and funerary sculptures, others have been carefully chosen for l o particular architectural and ornamental pieces. e latter stones were restricted to é h c public buildings or major private houses. is taste for ornamental stones, part of r A which were derived from the Mediterranean realm, has generated an important – s supply activity of products derived from provincial quarries. Where are these t n materials coming from? What is their geographical distribution? What kind of social e m and economic mechanisms are playing here? What kind of decorative elements have u c they been used for? What happened aer abandonment of the buildings? Were the o D quarries still active during post-Roman times? What is the importance of t e their recycling? s e d u t É In recent years, research into the origin and provenance of Roman ornamental stones in North-Western Europe, experienced a new impetus, generating the need for an International Conference. is conference was hosted in Belgium by the Prix de vente : 40 € Gallo-Roman Museum of Tongeren, on April 20-22, 2016. is volume presents the full papers of the oral talks and posters given and shown at the meeting. e ISBN : 978-2-39038-005-4 conference offered a true interdisciplinary and international exchange platform for archaeologists, geologists, (art) historians, heritage and restoration specialists and for all those interested in the provenance and distribution of ornamental stones, their extraction, processing and recycling in the Roman provinces of North- Western Europe. Études et Documents Archéologie Agence wallonne du Patrimoine 38 Études et Documents Archéologie 38 La série ARCHÉOLOGIE de la collection ÉTUDES ET DOCUMENTS est une publication de l'AGENCE WALLONNE DU PATRIMOINE Service public de Wallonie Direction générale opérationnelle de l'aménagement du territoire, du logement, du patrimoine et de l'énergie Agence wallonne du Patrimoine Rue des Brigades d'Irlande, 1 B-5100 Jambes DIFFUSION ET VENTE ÉDITEUR RESPONSABLE Service publications Jean Plumier, Résidence du Grand Cortil, Inspecteur général-expert Place des Célestines, 21 (derrière l'hôtel Ibis) B-5000 Namur COORDINATION ÉDITORIALE Tél. : +32 (0)81.230.703 ou +32 (0)81.654.154 Liliane Henderickx et Julien Maquet Fax : +32 (0)81.231.890 [email protected] CONCEPTION GRAPHIQUE www.awap.be DE LA COLLECTION www.patrimoine-publications.be Ken Dethier no vert de la Wallonie : 1718 MISE EN PAGE & COORDINATION GRAPHIQUE www.wallonie.be Jean-François Lemaire En cas de litige, Médiateur de Wallonie : IMPRIMERIE Marc Bertrand Snel, Vottem Tél. : 0800.19.199 — le-mediateur.be COUVERTURE Le texte engage la seule responsabilité des auteurs. Detail of the mosaic floor discovered during excavations in the L'éditeur s'est efforcé de régler les droits relatifs Hondsstraat, Tongeren (photo: A. Vanderhoeven & G. Vynckier, aux illustrations conformément aux prescriptions © Flemish Heritage Institute, Brussels) légales. Les détenteurs de droits qui, malgré ses recherches, n'auraient pu être retrouvés sont priés de RÉFÉRENCE BIBLIOGRAPHIQUE se faire connaître à l'éditeur. Coquelet C., Creemers G., Dreesen R. & Goemare É. (ed.), 2018. Roman Ornamental Stones in North-Western Europe. Natural Resources, Manufacturing, Supply, Life & After-Life, Namur (Études et Documents, Archéologie, 38), 377 p. Avertissement Depuis le 1er janvier 2018, le Département du Patrimoine de la direction générale opérationnelle de l'aménagement du territoire, du logement, du patrimoine et de l'énergie du Service public de Wallonie, Tous droits réservés pour tous pays et l'Institut du Patrimoine wallon sont Dépôt légal : D/2018/14.407/08 réunis au sein de la nouvelle Agence ISBN : 978-2-39038-005-4 wallonne du Patrimoine (AWaP). ROMAN ORNAMENTAL STONES IN NORTH-WESTERN EUROPE NATURAL RESOURCES, MANUFACTURING, SUPPLY, LIFE & AFTER-LIFE Edited by Catherine Coquelet, Guido Creemers, Roland Dreesen and Éric Goemaere ÉTUDES ET DOCUMENTS Proceedings of the International conference ‘Roman ornamental stones Archéologie, 38 in north-western Europe. Natural resources, manufacturing, supply, life & Namur, 2018 after-life’, Gallo-Roman Museum of Tongeren (Belgium), 20-22 April 2016 Service public de Wallonie Direction générale opérationnelle de l'Aménagement du territoire, du Logement, du Patrimoine et de l'Énergie Agence wallonne du Patrimoine TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 13 CATHERINE COQUELET, GUIDO CREEMERS, ROLAND DREESEN & ÉRIC GOEMAERE PART 1 ORIGIN AND PROVENANCE OF THE RAW MATERIALS AN INTRODUCTION TO THE MOST IMPORtaNT DECORativE STONES OF ANCIENT GREECE: USE, DISTRIBUTION, QUARRIES, CHARACTERIZatiON AND ARCHAEOMETRIC PROBLEMS 19 LORENZO LAZZARINI ON THE ROMAn use of ‘BELGIAN MArbles’ IN THE CIVITAS TUNGRORUM AND BEYOND 25 ROLAND DREESEN, MARLEEN DE CEUKELAIRE & VILMA RUPPIENÉ 1. Introduction . 25 2. The ‘Belgian marbles’ . 26 3. Occurrences and uses of ‘Belgian marbles’. 40 4. Conclusions . 45 GRANITO VERDE A ERBETTA FROM THE RUWER-vaLLEY NEAR TRIER: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM PETROGRAPHY AND MAJOR ELEMENT COMPOSITIONS 51 VILMA RUPPIENÉ & TATJANA MIRJAM GLUHAK 1. Introduction . 51 2. Geology of the region and sampling . 53 3. Results. 55 4. Conclusions . 59 AN OVERVIEW OF ROMAN DIMENSION STONES IN THE NETHERLANDS 63 TIMO G. NIJLAND, C. WIM DUBELAAR & JAN DRÖGE 1. Introduction . 63 2. Imported dimension stones. 63 3. Local dimension stones . 70 4. Conclusion. 71 Études et Documents Archéologie 38 5 ROMAN ORNAMENTAL STONES IN NORTH-WESTERN EUROPE ORNAMENtaL STONES USED IN THE VILLA at DAMBLAIN (VOSGES, FRANCE) 79 JEAN-MICHEL MECHLING, KARINE BOULANGER & VINCENT BARBIN 1. Location and presentation of the archaeological site of Damblain. 79 2. Macroscopic description of the decorative and building stones . 81 3. Characterization of the stones and origins of their deposits . 83 4. An optimization of the stones provenance/cost?. 89 5. Conclusions . 90 THE GEOLOGICAL SOURCE OF THE EARLIEST TOMBSTONES AND ARCHITECTURAL FRagmENTS FROM SOUTHERN BRitaNNIA: A PETROLOGICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL INVEStigatiON OF STONE FROM PRE-FLaviaN COLCHESTER 93 KEVIN M.J. HAYWARD 1. Introduction . 93 2. Methodology and archaeological dataset . 95 3. Results: the lithotypes . 96 4. Case study Claudio-Neronian Colchester . 98 5. Conclusions . .102 PODpeč LIMESTONE FOR COLONIA IULIA EMONA (REGIO X, VENETIA AND HISTRIA) 107 BOJAN Djurić, LUKA GALE & Snježana Miletić 1. Introduction . .107 2. Localisation . .108 3. Use of black limestone in Emona: previous research . .109 4. New research: methods and results. .110 5. Discussion and conclusions. 111 PROVENANCE ANALYSIS OF ROMAN LIMESTONE FROM THE MOSELLE VALLEY VIA NEUTRON ACTIVATION: RESEARCH OF THE JOHANNES GUTENBERG-UNIVERSITÄT MAINZ (GERMANY) 113 CHRISTIAN STIEGHORST, HANS-PETER KUHNEN, JAN PATRICK NEUMANN & CHRISTIAN PLONKA 1. Introduction . .114 2. State of research . 116 3. Sampling. 117 4. Provenance analysis . .119 5. Results of the elemental distribution. .120 6. Results of the multivariate data analysis . .122 7. Conclusion and outlook . .124 6 PART 2 SOCIO-ECONOMICS OF STONE EXTRACTION AND DISTRIBUTION ‘DIFFICULT AND COSTLY’: sTONE TRANSPORT, ITS CONSTRAINTS, AND ITS IMPACt 131 BEN RUSSELL 1. Introduction . .131 2. The maritime dimension. 132 3. Overland and up-river . .136 4. The impact of transportation . .139 5. Stone and other commodities. 142 6. Conclusions . .144 StONE OBJECTS FROM VINDOBONA (AUSTRIA): PROVENANCE OF LOCAL STONE IN A HISTORICO-ECONOMICAL SEttiNG 151 SOPHIE INSULANDER, MICHAELA KRONBERGER, BEATRIX MOSHAMMER & MARTIN MOSSER 1. Introduction, questions and methodological approach. 151 2. Quarrying regions. 153 3. Case examples . .153 4. Analysis by linking various data sources . .158 5. Perspectives. 160 USE AND TRADE OF ORNAMENtaL ROCKS IN THE MID-EBRO vaLLEY (SPAIN) IN THE ROMAN ERA 163 MIGUEL CISNEROS 1. Introduction . .163 2. Marbleisation . .164 3. Distribution and supply of marble: access routes . .168 4. Final considerations . .171 RUPTURE OR CONTINUITY IN STONE SUPPLY BETWEEN THE ROMAn AND EARLY MEDIEvaL TIMES (LatE 6TH–7TH CENTURY AD)? ORIGIN AND DISTRIBUTION OF LIMESTONE SARCOPhagi IN NORTHERN GAUL AND RE-USE OF ROMAN ORNAMENtaL STONES 175 LAURE-ANNE FINOULST 1. Provenance and use of stones in Northern Gaul during the Roman period. 175 2. Provenance and use of ornamental stones in the Early Middle Ages . .177 3. Sarcophagi in the Early Middle Ages: reused Roman ornamental stones and new sculptures. .177 4. From the Roman period through the Early Middle Ages: a same trade?. 178 5. Conclusions . .180 Études et Documents Archéologie 38 7 ROMAN ORNAMENTAL STONES IN NORTH-WESTERN EUROPE PART 3 CARVING THE STONE ANTIQUE DECORativE STONE CUttiNG: RESULTS AND RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES 183 LES TAILLES DÉCORAtives antiques : RÉSULTATS ET PERSPECTIVES DE RECHERCHES JEAN-CLAUDE BESSAC 1. L'esthétique antique des pierres et sa perception actuelle . 183 2. Une approche fondée sur la pratique traditionnelle du métier. .185 3. Les bossages brochés au pic sur pierre tendre et ferme . .186 4. Les bossages naturels ou éclatés sur les roches les plus résistantes . .188 5. Les bossages rustiques sont-ils fonctionnels ou décoratifs ? . .188 6. Du bossage fonctionnel aux versions décoratives . 189 7. Les tailles réalisées au pic et à la broche. .191 8. Aperçu sur quelques autres tailles décoratives . .194 9. Les résultats et les perspectives de recherches. 196 StONE OPERatiONAL CHAIN AND WORKSHOPS WITHIN THE CIVITAS AEDUORUM BETWEEN THE 1ST AND THE 4TH cenTURIes AD 199 PIERRE-ANTOINE LAMY 1. Introduction . .199 2. Operational chain. 200 3. Identifying specific sculptors and workshops. 204 4. Datings. 208 THE STONE WORKSHOPS IN THE SANCTUARY OF PONT-SaiNTE-MAXENCE (OISE, PICARDY, FRANCE): NatURAL RESOURCES AND STYLISTIC COMPARISONS 211 VÉRONIQUE BRUNET-GASTON, CHRISTOPHE GASTON, ANNIE BLANC & PHILIPPE.
Recommended publications
  • Rock Creek and Potomac Parkway Near P Street, Ca
    ROCK CREEK AND ROCK CREEK'S BRIDGES Dumbarton Bridge William Howard Taft Bridge (8) Duke Ellington Bridge (9) POTOMAC PARKWAY Washington, D.C. The monumental bridges arching over Rock Creek contribute Dumbarton Bridge, at Q Street, is one of the parkway's most The William Howard Taft Bridge, built 1897-1907, is probably The current bridge at Calvert Street replaced a dramatic iron greatly to the parkway's appearance. Partially concealed by the endearing structures. It was designed by the noted architect the most notable span on the parkway. The elegant arched truss bridge built in 1891 to carry streetcars on the Rock Creek surrounding vegetation, they evoke the aqueducts and ruins Glenn Brown and completed in 1915. Its curving form structure carrying Connecticut Avenue over Rock Creek valley Railway line. When the parkway was built, it was determined m&EWAIl2 UN IIA^M1GN¥ found in romantic landscape paintings. In addition to framing compensates for the difference in alignment between the was Washington's first monumental masonry bridge. Its high that the existing bridge was unable to accommodate the rise in vistas and providing striking contrasts to the parkway's natural Washington and Georgetown segments of Q Street. cost and elaborate ornamentation earned it the nickname "The automobile traffic. The utilitarian steel structure was also features, they serve as convenient platforms for viewing the Million Dollar Bridge." In 1931 it was officially named after considered detrimental to the parkway setting. verdant parkway landscape. They also perform the utilitarian The overhanging pedestrian walkways and tall, deep arches former president William Howard Taft, who had lived nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Gallo-Roman Relations Under the Early Empire by Ryan Walsh A
    Gallo-Roman Relations under the Early Empire By Ryan Walsh A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Ancient Mediterranean Cultures Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2013 © Ryan Walsh 2013 1 Author's Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This paper examines the changing attitudes of Gallo-Romans from the time of Caesar's conquest in the 50s BCE to the start of Vespasian's reign in 70-71 CE and how Roman prejudice shaped those attitudes. I first examine the conflicted opinions of the Gauls in Caesar's time and how they eventually banded together against him but were defeated. Next, the activities of each Julio-Claudian emperor are examined to see how they impacted Gaul and what the Gallo-Roman response was. Throughout this period there is clear evidence of increased Romanisation amongst the Gauls and the prominence of the region is obvious in imperial policy. This changes with Nero's reign where Vindex's rebellion against the emperor highlights the prejudices still effecting Roman attitudes. This only becomes worse in the rebellion of Civilis the next year. After these revolts, the Gallo-Romans appear to retreat from imperial offices and stick to local affairs, likely as a direct response to Rome's rejection of them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Later Prehistoric and RB Pottery
    Kentish Sites and Sites of Kent A miscellany of four archaeological excavations Later prehistoric and Roman pottery from the route of the Weatherlees – Margate – Broadstairs wastewater pipeline By Grace Perpetua Jones Archaeological sites along the Weatherlees – Margate – Broadstairs wastewater pipeline route, arranged from north to south (= Table 2.1) Ref. in this Fieldwork NGR Site/features Date Civil parish report Area Codes Foreness 1–D 638400 World War II Modern Margate Point 171400 defences Kingsgate D 639277 Flint Mixed, (discussed in Broadstairs 171006 Bronze Age chapter) and St Peter’s Broadley 3 637697 Mortuary Neolithic (and Bronze Margate Road 169796 enclosure Age) (Northdown) (and ring-ditch) Star Lane 8 636007 Bakery - Sunken Early Medieval (12th- Manston 167857 Featured 13th century) Building 8 636073 Vessel ‘burial’ – Late Bronze Age Manston 167915 mortuary-related? Coldswood 9 635585 Casket cremation Late Iron Age to early Manston Road 166828 cemetery Romano-British Cottington 14 634011 Dual-rite Romano-British Minster Road 164328 cemetery 14 633997 Saxon sunken- Anglo-Saxon Minster 164324 featured building 14 634072 Pits Neolithic Minster 164367 Cottington 15 633845 Inhumation Romano-British Minster Hill 164106 graves 15 633851 Ditch terminus Anglo-Saxon Minster 163986 burial Ebbsfleet 16 633372 Ditches and Late Iron Age to early Minster Lane 163331 burials Romano-British Weatherlees Compound 633325 Ditches and Late Iron Age to early Minster WTW 16 163082 burials Romano-British (Marshes) (Ebbsfleet 633334 Lane) 163088
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Internal Borders in the Roman Empire: Written Sources and Model Cases
    Philippe Della Casa & Eckhard Deschler-Erb (eds.). Rome’s Internal Frontiers. Proceedings of the 2016 RAC session in Rome. Zurich Studies in Archaeology, Vol. 11, 2016, 11–16. The importance of internal borders in the Roman Empire: Written sources and model cases Anne Kolb & Lukas Zingg Universität Zürich, Historisches Seminar, Karl Schmid-Strasse 4, CH-8006 Zürich, [email protected], [email protected] Throughout the Roman Empire, borders divided territories such as provinces, customs areas, and cities. This paper aims at presenting examples of written sources which illustrate the function and significance of internal borders. A dispute over a canal building (Tac. ann. 13,53) provides an example for problems that could arise from cross-border activities. The control of boundaries could be ensured by military posts, as indicated by votive inscriptions to border gods. The exceptional marking of a provincial boundary in the Danube area has to be seen in context of territorial changes. Some milestones refer to provincial borders and seem to have occasionally served as border markers. Keywords: Provincial Borders, Provincial Territories, Military Stations, Boundary Markers, Milestones 1. Introduction of dispute between cities, tribes, or private individuals, the Over an area of approximately 6 million square kilomet- decision fell usually in the realm of the provincial governor res, the Romans ruled an enormous Empire, encompassing or an official commissioned with the task (Dilke 1971; Gals- about 50 to 80 million people. The consolidation and ad- terer 1992; Von Cranach 1996; Campbell 2000; Lewis 2001; ministrative pervasion of this global empire was the pri- Willi 2014; Kolb 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Was Galatian Really Celtic? Anthony Durham & Michael Goormachtigh First Published November 2011, Updated to October 2016
    Was Galatian Really Celtic? Anthony Durham & Michael Goormachtigh first published November 2011, updated to October 2016 Summary Saint Jerome’s AD 386 remark that the language of ancient Galatia (around modern Ankara) resembled the language of the Treveri (around modern Trier) has been misinterpreted. The “Celts”, “Gauls” or “Galatians” mentioned by classical authors, including those who invaded Greece and Anatolia around 277 BC, were not Celtic in the modern sense of speaking a Celtic language related to Welsh and Irish, but tall, pale-skinned, hairy, warrior peoples from the north. The 150 or so words and proper names currently known from Galatian speech show little affinity with Celtic but more with Germanic. Introduction In AD 386 Saint Jerome wrote: Apart from the Greek language, which is spoken throughout the entire East, the Galatians have their own language, almost the same as the Treveri. For many people this short remark is the linchpin of a belief that ancient Celtic speech spread far outside its Atlantic-fringe homeland, reaching even into the heart of Anatolia, modern Turkey. However, we wish to challenge the idea that Galatians spoke a language that was Celtic in the modern sense of being closely related to Welsh or Irish. Galatia was the region around ancient Ancyra, modern Ankara, in the middle of Turkey. Anatolia (otherwise known as Asia Minor) has seen many civilisations come and go over the millennia. Around 8000 BC it was a cradle of agriculture and the Neolithic revolution. The whole family of Indo-European languages originated somewhere in that region. We favour the idea that they grew up around the Black Sea all the way from northern Anatolia, past the mouth of the river Danube, to southern Russia and Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Lead Sealings
    Roman Lead Sealings VOLUME I MICHAEL CHARLES WILLIAM STILL SUBMITTED FOR TIlE DEGREE OF PILD. SEPTEMBER 1995 UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY (L n") '3 1. ABSTRACT This thesis is based on a catalogue of c. 1800 records, covering over 2000 examples of Roman lead sealings, many previously unpublished. The catalogue is provided with indices of inscriptions and of anepigraphic designs, and subsidiary indices of places, military units, private individuals and emperors mentioned on the scalings. The main part of the thesis commences with a history of the use of lead sealings outside of the Roman period, which is followed by a new typology (the first since c.1900) which puts special emphasis on the use of form as a guide to dating. The next group of chapters examine the evidence for use of the different categories of scalings, i.e. Imperial, Official, Taxation, Provincial, Civic, Military and Miscellaneous. This includes evidence from impressions, form, texture of reverse, association with findspot and any literary references which may help. The next chapter compares distances travelled by similar scalings and looks at the widespread distribution of identical scalings of which the origin is unknown. The first statistical chapter covers imperial sealings. These can be assigned to certain periods and can thus be subjected to the type of analysis usually reserved for coins. The second statistical chapter looks at the division of categories of scalings within each province. The scalings in each category within each province are calculated as percentages of the provincial total and are then compared with an adjusted percentage for that category in the whole of the empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Assessment of a Monumental Masonry Construction: the Rocca Albornoziana of Spoleto
    Available online at www.eccomasproceedia.org Eccomas Proceedia COMPDYN (2017) 2239-2252 COMPDYN 2017 6th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering M. Papadrakakis, M. Fragiadakis (eds.) Rhodes Island, Greece, 15–17 June 2017 SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF A MONUMENTAL MASONRY CONSTRUCTION: THE ROCCA ALBORNOZIANA OF SPOLETO G. Castori1, A. Borri2, M. Corradi2, A. De Maria3 and R. Sisti2 1 Department of Engineering, University of Perugia via Duranti 93, 06125 Perugia, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Engineering, University of Perugia via Duranti 93, 06125 Perugia, Italy [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 3 Ufficio Vigilanza e Controllo sulle Costruzioni, Region of Umbria Via Palermo 106, 06129 Perugia, Italy [email protected] Keywords: Military constructions, historic masonry, numerical analysis. Abstract. The structural analysis of monumental constructions requires considering safety and conservation objectives, including the possible presence of artistic assets. In order to face these issues, this paper presents the results of a diagnostic analysis carried out on a 14th-century fortress: the Rocca Albornoziana of Spoleto in Umbria. Within this context, particular attention was de-voted to the choice of the most reliable modelling strategy for the application of the displacement approach in the seismic Performance-Based Assessment (PBA) procedure, as a function of different possible seismic behaviors. Seismic vulnerability was evaluated using a pushover method, and the results obtained with the nonlinear numerical model have been com- pared with the simplified schemes of the limit analysis. The capacity of the fortress to withstand lateral loads was evaluated with the expected demands resulting from the seismic action.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic and Restoration Assessment of Monumental Masonry Structures
    Article Seismic and Restoration Assessment of Monumental Masonry Structures Panagiotis G. Asteris 1,*, Maria G. Douvika 1, Maria Apostolopoulou 2 and Antonia Moropoulou 2 1 Computational Mechanics Laboratory, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education, Heraklion, 14121 Athens, Greece; [email protected] 2 Laboratory of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece; [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (A.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +30-210-2896922 Received: 23 June 2017; Accepted: 20 July 2017; Published: 2 August 2017 Abstract: Masonry structures are complex systems that require detailed knowledge and information regarding their response under seismic excitations. Appropriate modelling of a masonry structure is a prerequisite for a reliable earthquake-resistant design and/or assessment. However, modelling a real structure with a robust quantitative (mathematical) representation is a very difficult, complex and computationally-demanding task. The paper herein presents a new stochastic computational framework for earthquake-resistant design of masonry structural systems. The proposed framework is based on the probabilistic behavior of crucial parameters, such as material strength and seismic characteristics, and utilizes fragility analysis based on different failure criteria for the masonry material. The application of the proposed methodology is illustrated in the case of a historical and monumental masonry structure, namely the assessment of the seismic vulnerability of the Kaisariani Monastery, a byzantine church that was built in Athens, Greece, at the end of the 11th to the beginning of the 12th century. Useful conclusions are drawn regarding the effectiveness of the intervention techniques used for the reduction of the vulnerability of the case-study structure, by means of comparison of the results obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Wealth in the Roman Empire
    G Model EHB 762 No. of Pages 13 Economics and Human Biology xxx (2018) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Economics and Human Biology journa l homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ehb Health and wealth in the Roman Empire Willem M. Jongman*, Jan P.A.M. Jacobs, Geertje M. Klein Goldewijk University of Groningen, the Netherlands A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Ancient Rome was the largest and most populous empire of its time, and the largest pre-industrial state in Received 30 August 2018 European history. Recent though not universally accepted research suggests that at least for the most Received in revised form 14 January 2019 populous central periods of its history standard of living was also rather higher than before or after. To Accepted 15 January 2019 trace whether this is also reflected in Roman biological standard of living, we present the first large and Available online xxx more or less comprehensive dataset, based on skeletal data for some 10,000 individuals, covering all periods of Roman history, and all regions (even if inevitably unequally). We discuss both the JEL classification: methodologies that we developed and the historical results. Instead of reconstructing heights from the C55 fi C82 long bones assuming xed body proportions or from one individual long bone, we apply exploratory N01 factor analysis and calculate factor scores for 50-year periods. Our measure of the biological standard of N33 living declined during the last two centuries B.C. and started to improve again, slowly at first, from the O01 second century A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/26472 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-09-29 and may be subject to change. J. E. Bogners, The Netherlands SOME NOTES IN CONNECTION WITH THE DUTCH SECTION OF THE LIMES OF GERMANIA INFERIOR (GERMANIA SECUNDA) l At the Third International Congress of Roman Frontier Studies at Rheinfelden -Basel, held in 1957, H. von Petrikovits read a paper entitled “Der niedergermanische Limes” , and presented a map showing the military settlements along the line of this part of the frontier.1 It is now possible to present a supplementary map, whose principal aim is to give a more detailed picture of its Dutch section (Fig. 44). The lower German fronticr-system consisted of a chain of fortresses and forts dating any-. where from the reign of Tiberius down to c. A.D. 260 or ,270,2 and lying along the eastern and northern boundaries of the military district that became the province of Germania Inferior' in the reign of Domitian.3 From the southern boundary on the Vinxtbach they extended along the Rhine and further west - on the north side of the west part of the “Insula Batavorum” 4 - they are found along the Kromme Rijn (from Wijk bij Duurstede to Utrecht) and the Oude Rijn (from Utrecht to Katwijk). With the exception of the legionary fortress at Nijmegen (Batavodorum/Noviomagus),5 south of the Rhine arm known as the Waal, the map shows no military sites in the hinterland.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Soldier Germanic Warrior Lindsay Ppowellowell
    1st Century AD Roman Soldier VERSUS Germanic Warrior Lindsay Powell © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com 1st Century ad Roman Soldier Germanic Warrior Lindsay PowellPowell © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION 4 THE OPPOSING SIDES 10 Recruitment and motivation t Morale and logistics t Training, doctrine and tactics Leadership and communications t Use of allies and auxiliaries TEUTOBURG PASS 28 Summer AD 9 IDISTAVISO 41 Summer AD 16 THE ANGRIVARIAN WALL 57 Summer AD 16 ANALYSIS 71 Leadership t Mission objectives and strategies t Planning and preparation Tactics, combat doctrine and weapons AFTERMATH 76 BIBLIOGRAPHY 78 INDEX 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com Introduction ‘Who would leave Asia, or Africa, or Italia for Germania, with its wild country, its inclement skies, its sullen manners and aspect, unless indeed it were his home?’ (Tacitus, Germania 2). This negative perception of Germania – the modern Netherlands and Germany – lay behind the reluctance of Rome’s great military commanders to tame its immense wilderness. Caius Iulius Caesar famously threw a wooden pontoon bridge across the River Rhine (Rhenus) in just ten days, not once but twice, in 55 and 53 bc. The next Roman general to do so was Marcus Agrippa, in 39/38 bc or 19/18 bc. However, none of these missions was for conquest, but in response to pleas for assistance from an ally of the Romans, the Germanic nation of the Ubii. It was not until the reign of Caesar Augustus that a serious attempt was made to annex the land beyond the wide river and transform it into a province fit for Romans to live in.
    [Show full text]