Integrating Human Rights Into Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrating Human Rights Into Development Public Disclosure Authorized THIRD EDITION Public Disclosure Authorized INTEGRATING HUMAN RIGHTS INTO Public Disclosure Authorized DEVELOPMENT DONOR APPROACHES, EXPERIENCES AND CHALLENGES Public Disclosure Authorized INTEGRATING HUMAN RIGHTS INTO DEVELOPMENT DONOR APPROACHES, EXPERIENCES AND CHALLENGES Third Edition © 2016 OECD and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW,Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 16 15 14 13 A copublication of The World Bank and the OECD. This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank and the OECD. Note that The World Bank and the OECD do not necessarily own each component of the content included in the work. The World Bank and the OECD therefore do not warrant that the use of the content contained in the work will not infringe on the rights of third parties. The risk of claims resulting from such infringement rests solely with you. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent, or the OECD. The World Bank and the OECD do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The bound- aries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank or the OECD concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank and the OECD, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions Available to copy, distribute translate and transmit the work for noncommercial and commercial purposes with appropriate attribution to the work, using the language provided below. Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: World Bank and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013. Integrating Human Rights into Development: Donor Approaches, Experiences, and Challenges, 3rd ed. Washington, DC. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-9621-6. Translations—If you create a translation of this work, please add the following disclaimer along with the attribution: This translation was not created by The World Bank and/or the OECD and should not be con- sidered an official World Bank /OECD translation. The World Bank and the OECD shall not be liable for any content or error in this translation. All queries on rights and licenses should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: [email protected]. Cover design: Jihane El Khoury Roederer Foreword iii Preface vi Acknowledgements x Acronyms and Abbreviations xiii Executive Summary xx CHAPTER 1 1 Donor Policies and Rationales 1 I. A Changing Global Context 1 II. Policies and Rationales 4 III. Legal and Policy Considerations 16 IV. From Policy to Practice 25 Chapter 2. 26 Preliminary 26 I. Intrinsic Value 26 II. Instrumental Value 32 III. Other Operational Benefits 46 IV. Adaptability to Different Political and Cultural Environments 50 V. Findings and Issues for Further Consideration 51 Chapter 3. 52 Global Approaches to Human Rights in Development Programming 52 I. Human Rights–Based Approaches (HRBA) 53 II. Mainstreaming Human Rights 60 III. Human rights dialogue and Conditionality 73 IV. Human Rights Projects 77 V. Global Human Rights Initiatives 79 VI. Human Rights Research 82 VII. Implicit Human Rights Work 85 VIII. Findings and Issues for Further Consideration 90 Chapter 4 92 Policies to Integrate Human Rights into Development 92 I. UN Bodies and Specialized Agencies 92 II. European Union 103 III. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 105 IV. Bilateral Agencies 107 V. International Financial Institutions 113 VI. Emerging Donors 118 Chapter 5 121 Processes, Guidance, Assessment, and Programming Tools 121 I. Universal Periodic Review 121 II. Human Rights Guidance, Toolkits, and Implementation 124 III. Human Rights Impact Assessments 131 i IV. Human Rights Indicators 132 V. New Tools and Procedures 134 VI. Training and Learning Programmes 136 Chapter 6 138 Case Studies: Country Projects and Programmes 138 I. Bangladesh: NORAD’s Women and Gender Equality Programmes 138 II. Bolivia: SIDA Support for Education 140 III. Ukraine: The SDC Development Programme 141 IV. Fiji: New Zealand Aid Programme 144 V. Bangladesh: GIZ Judicial Reform 146 VI. Vietnam: UNICEF 146 VII. Kenya: Swedish Programmes 150 VIII. Serbia: EIB Right to Housing 152 Chapter 7 154 Case Studies: Sector-Specific Projects and Programmes 154 I. Gender Equality 154 II. Health 157 III. Education 159 IV. Disabilities 162 V. Support to Civil Society 166 VI. Labour and the Right to Work 167 VII. Torture, Inhumane Treatment or Punishment, and the Death Penalty 168 VIII. The Right to Food and Nutrition 169 IX. Indigenous Peoples 171 X. Conflict and Fragility 172 XI. LGBTI Rights 174 Chapter 8 176 Challenges and Opportunities 176 I. Institutionalization 176 II. Senior-Level Commitment, Accountability, and Communication 178 III. Budgetary Considerations 179 IV. Staff Capacities and Incentives 180 V. Adapting to Decentralization 183 VI. State Fragility and Capacity Limitations 185 VII. Partner-Country Ownership, Political Resistance to Human Rights, and Mutual Accountability 189 VIII. Aid Allocation and Aid Modalities 193 IX. Adopting a Holistic Approach to Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights and Civil and Political Rights 194 X. Policy Coherence 196 XI. Findings and Issues for Further Consideration 200 ii Foreword I welcome the third edition of Integrating Human Rights into Development as an invaluable resource for those committed to advancing engagement between human rights and development professionals and organizations. During my term as United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, and over the course of my work with both Realizing Rights: The Ethical Globalization Initiative and the Mary Robinson Foundation–Climate Justice, I have continued to underscore the urgent need for human rights and development agendas to work in a mutually reinforcing way in order to eliminate poverty and promote equitable and sustainable development. The areas of convergence are becoming more and more apparent, including through initiatives on climate justice, migration, inclusion, disabilities, and that further the equality and empowerment of women and girls. The message at the level of principle and broad political commitment continues to support the fundamental compatibility of human rights and development goals, as milestones of recent years have also shown. At the same time, international policy coherence remains high on the list of international priorities for donors and is of direct relevance to the integration of human rights into development. A number of policy milestones continue to guide donor programming and to promote the convergence between human rights and development at the level of principles, values, and goals. Of sustained relevance to this study, including in its third edition, is the DAC’s 2007 Action- Oriented Policy Paper on Human Rights and Development, which included ten principles designed to serve as a basic orientation on human rights in key development areas, where donor harmonization is of particular relevance. These principles continue to provide pertinent guidance to donors and international development actors, for instance in recalling the principle of ‘do no harm’ or in respect of fragile states and conflict which present particular human rights challenges for development programming. In the area of aid effectiveness, the second edition captured milestones, such as the 2008 Accra Agenda for Action which recognized respect for human rights as one of the cornerstones of sustainable development and the Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, held in Busan in 2011, where donors and partners again reaffirmed the importance of shared principles, which are consistent with their international commitments and form the foundation for cooperation for effective development. iii In the past four years, the post-2015 context generated perhaps the most significant milestones with the proclamation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the SDG Declaration (Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015; Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development) which was unequivocal in its affirmation of the centrality of human rights to development. It clearly states, “The new Agenda is guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, including full respect for international law. It is grounded in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international human rights treaties, the Millennium Declaration and the 2005 World Summit Outcome. It is informed by other instruments such as the Declaration on the Right to Development.” The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development must now be read together with the Paris Climate Agreement, and its commitment to staying “well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels”. The Paris Agreement also commits governments to achieve carbon neutrality in the second half of the century, and its terms should be interpreted in accordance with the human rights language in the preamble which requires
Recommended publications
  • Norden Och Internationella Mänskliga Rättigheter1
    Mellan ambivalens och aktivism: Norden och internationella mänskliga rättigheter1 Johan Karlsson Schaffer, fil.dr. Forskare, Norsk senter for menneskerettigheter, Universitetet i Oslo Postboks 6706, St. Olavs plass 5, 0130 Oslo, Norge +47-41226217, [email protected] Antagen för publicering i Retfærd: Nordic Journal of Law and Justice, 40:1, 2017. 1 För konstruktiva kommentarer på tidigare versioner av denna uppsats vill jag tacka Anna Andersson, Bård Anders Andreassen, Cecilie Figenschou Bakke, Kjersti Bratha- gen, Agniezska Cybulska, Marie Demker, Anine Kierulf, Malcolm Langford och Kjetil M. Larsen. Jag vill också tacka Kiki Anastasia Japutra och Aled Dilwyn Fisher för hjälp med datainsamling. 1 Abstract In this paper, I ask why Nordic governments seem no longer to be forerunners in the expansion of the international human rights regime, in light of their historical engage- ment. Existing research tends to portray the Nordics as exceptional in terms of either their international commitment to human rights norms, or their domestic reluctance to- ward constitutionalism, judicial review and legal rights, and grounds their exceptional- ism in deep-seated value traditions within Nordic societies. This paper instead explores their external and internal rights policies as interconnected and as resulting from domes- tic agents actively mobilizing certain ideas. Covering the Nordic states’ roles in the es- tablishment and expansion of the global and European human rights regimes, and the subsequent repercussions of these institutions on the domestic orders in the Nordic countries, the article concludes by discussing the maturing institutionalisation of human rights in constitutional practice within the Nordic polities in recent years. Keywords Danmark, Europarådet, Finland, Island, konstitutionalism, mänskliga rättigheter, Nor- den, Norge, Sverige.
    [Show full text]
  • A National Human Rights Action Plan – a Summary Skr
    Written Communication A National Human Rights Action Plan – A summary Skr. 2001/02:83 Foreword At the UN World Conference on Human Rights that took place in Vienna in 1993, all states were recommended to consider drawing up national action plans in order to identify measures to improve the promotion and protection of human rights. Several states have followed this recommendation. The Swedish work started in May 2000 when an interdepartmental working group was appointed at the Ministry of Justice with the task of drawing up a proposal for a national action plan. Several informal reference groups (some 240 actors) were invited to take part in this work. The Swedish Government decided to adopt the national action plan in January 2002 as a written communication to the Parliament (the Riksdag). The action plan is to span over a three-year period and applies to 2002-2004. The national action plan describes, inter alia, Sweden’s responsibilities in this field, the long-term objectives of the Government and the role of various actors regarding work on human rights at the national level. It goes on to describe certain priority issues for further work in improving the promotion and protection of human rights, indicating how the Government intends to work with issues such as human rights education. Finally it discusses an information strategy, follow-up and evaluation mechanisms of the action plan. Britta Lejon Minister for Democratic Issues 1 Content Skr. 2001/02:83 1 The task............................................................................................. 4 2 National Action Plan for Human Rights........................................... 4 2.1 Purpose of the National Action Plan etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Human Rights Strategy
    Introduction to the Human Rights Strategy Human rights apply to everyone, always and everywhere. They apply in Sweden and in other countries. This ought to be obvious, but we live in a time when the protection of and respect for human rights in the world at large is being weakened and questioned. This makes it particularly important that international human rights conventions and norms are taken very seriously. The Government of Sweden’s goal for its human rights policy has been set ambitiously; namely to guarantee full respect for Sweden’s international commitments on human rights. As part of its work towards this goal, on 13 October 2016 the Government adopted this strategy for its national efforts on human rights. Through this strategy, the Government has established a platform for its continuing efforts towards achieving this goal. The implication of the strategy is that compliance with Sweden’s international commitments on human rights cannot be taken for granted in either the short or long term. Instead, further steps must be taken towards a coherent structure for the promotion and protection of human rights. In this strategy, the Government has formed the assessment that a coherent structure ought to consist of the following parts: • Strong legal and institutional protection for human rights by means of an independent institution for the protection of human rights; • Coordinated and systematic work with human rights within the public services sector; and • Strong support for work with human rights in civil society and in business. This publication is an abridged version and contains the Government of Sweden’s strategy for national work with human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inquiry Into the Compatibility of the Demo-Conditionality with State Sovereignty in International Law
    An Inquiry into the Compatibility of the Demo-Conditionality with State Sovereignty in International Law An Inquiry into the Compatibility of Demo-Conditionality with State Sovereignty in International Law Special Focus: The Relations between the European Union and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Countries Richard Juma Nyabinda Doctoral Thesis presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Auditorium Minus, Gustavianum, Uppsala, Friday, January 21st, 2011,at 10.15 for the degree of Doctor of Laws. The examination will be conducted in English. Abstract Juma-Nyabinda, R., 2009. An Inquiry into the Compatibility of the Demo-Conditionality with State Sovereignty in International law. With Special Focus on The European Union and the African, the Caribbean and the Pacific Countries Relations. Faculty of Law. 313 pp. ISBN 978-91-506-2170-9 This study examines the issue of compatibility of demo-conditionality with state sovereignty in international law. From a practical perspective, it examines the state of the science with respect to the enforcement of demo-conditionality, in the context of the unique relationship between the European Union and the African, Caribbean and Pacific countries. The practicality of any argument declaring certain norms to be compatible with state sover- eignty rests on an assumption that it is possible to distinguish which norms are compatible from those which are not. The validity of such an assumption depends on whether a universal workable test with which to draw this distinction, and its accompanying requirements, has been or can be developed. Therefore, the starting point of this study is to investigate whether such a universal test exists, and if so, what its requirements are.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Times of Covid-19
    HUMAN RIGHTS IN TIMES OF COVID-19: CAMPING ON SEESAWS WHEN BALANCING A STATE’S HUMAN RIGHTS OBLIGATIONS AGAINST THE ECONOMY AND WELFARE OF ITS PEOPLE A HUMAN RIGHTS STUDY WITH SPECIAL FOCUS ON HOW THE NPA-REGION IN SWEDEN LIVED UP TO ITS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITMENTS DURING THE PANDEMIC Katinka Svanberg Dr of Laws, Sweden April 2021 1 CONTACT: Katinka Svanberg, Dr of Laws and human rights expert, who completed this report as a Visiting Scholar at the University of Melbourne Law School, [email protected] Thomas Fisher, Director, CoDeL, [email protected] The views expressed within this report are those of the author This report was delivered as part of the NPA’s Covid-19 Response project focused on the economic impacts of Covid-19 (https://core.interreg-npa.eu/) The project involved the following partners and associated partners: https://core.interreg-npa.eu/ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 5 Part I. A Comparison Between the Impacts of the Spanish Flu and Covid-19 on the NPA-Region in Sweden 6 1. The Spanish Flu in Norrland 6 2. Covid-19 and Norrland 7 3. Conclusion 10 Part II: An Overview of Human Rights and of the Swedish Commitment to Human Rights in Accordance With its National Laws 12 1. Three Generations of Human Rights 12 2. Non-Derogable and Derogable Human Rights 14 3. Sweden's Human Rights Commitments 15 4. The National Level 16 Part. III. Did Sweden’s Covid-19 Policies Violate Human Rights? 17 1. The Swedish Strategy 17 2. Herd Immunity 17 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Rape and Human Rights in the Nordic Countries
    CASE CLOSED RAPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE NORDIC COUNTRIES CASE CLOSED RAPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE NORDIC COUNTRIES The Danish, SWedish, Finnish and NORWegian sections OF AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL case closed taBle of contents 1. introduction 6 3. RAPE and human rights IN SWEDEN 45 1.1 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW 7 3.1 SUMMARY 45 1.1.1 Rule of law 9 1.1.2 Support and assistance 10 3.2 INTERNATIONAL CRITICISM 46 1.1.3 Change of attitudes 10 3.3 LEGAL FRAMEWORK 46 1.2 RAPE IN THE NORDic COUNTRIES 11 3.3.1 History 46 3.3.2 Current law 47 1.3 A PRIORITY ISSUe – bUT STILL AN ALARMING REALITY 13 3.3.3 Rape provisions 47 1.3.1 Attrition 13 3.3.4 Sexual coercion 49 3.3.5 Levels of sanctions 49 2. RAPE and human rights in denmarK 15 3.3.6 Follow-up of the rape legislation 49 3.3.7 Amnesty International Sweden’s main concerns 51 2.1 SUMMARY 15 3.4 THE SCALE OF THE PROBLEM 52 2.2 LEGAL FRAMEWORK 16 3.4.1 Unreported cases 52 3.4.2 Reported rapes 54 2.2.1 History 16 3.4.3 Different types of rape 55 2.2.3 Vice crimes as opposed to sexual crimes 18 3.4.4 Amnesty International Sweden’s main concerns 58 2.2.4 Level of sanctions 19 2.2.5 Criminal intention 20 2.2.6 Amnesty International Denmark’s main concerns 20 3.5 THE LEGAL JOURNEY 58 3.5.1 The decision to prosecute 60 2.3 THE SCALE OF THE PROBLEM 21 3.5.2 Review of the prosecutor’s decision 62 2.3.1 Estimates of prevalence 21 3.5.3 Convictions 62 2.3.2 Acquaintance rape most common 21 3.5.4 The legal process in rape cases 63 2.3.3 Rape victims are young women 22 3.5.5 Rape investigations and investigative
    [Show full text]
  • Sweden: a Cold Welcome
    SWEDEN: A COLD WELCOME HUMAN RIGHTS OF ROMA AND OTHER ‘VULNERABLE EU CITIZENS’ AT RISK Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2018 Cover photo: Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons © Amnesty International Sweden (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2018 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: EUR 42/9403/2018 November 2018 Original language: English. amnesty.org CONTENTS A NOTE ON TERMINOLOGY 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 METHODOLOGY 11 1. CONTEXT 13 1.1 EU ROMA INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK AND NATIONAL ROMA INCLUSION STRATEGIES 15 1.2 PUBLIC RESPONSE TO THE ARRIVAL OF “VULNERABLE EU CITIZENS” AND DEBATE ON BEGGING 16 1.3 POLITICAL RESPONSES TO THE ARRIVAL OF “VULNERABLE EU CITIZENS” 18 1.4 THE DOMESTIC LEGAL LANDSCAPE RELEVANT TO “VULNERABLE EU CITIZENS” 20 FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT, RIGHT OF RESIDENCE AND THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD 20 “UNDOCUMENTED” OR NOT? 21 RESIDENCY STATUS AND ACCESS TO SOCIAL SERVICES 21 2.
    [Show full text]