DOCSLIB.ORG

A R Iz O N a U T a H California C a L If O R N Ia Oregon Idaho

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BASINS OF NEVADA £ * # £ 47N £ £ IDAHO k OREGON J 10 e Jackpot a 18E 19E 24E 25E e 20E 21E 22E 23E 26E 27E Denio r r 47N b £ 28E McDermitt C i E d E Owyhee 69E 2 g 2 67E 68E 70E / / 1 11 5 e 65E 66E 1 55E 46N 1 47N 60E 62E 64E 4 61E 63E 6 3 45E 46E 47E 48E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 57E 59E 5 56E 2 30E 31E 33E 54E 47N 58E 32E 40E 42E s 34E 35E 36E 37E 38E 39E 43E B l 13 ÷ø140 r l u C K n a a 46N i r e n F n e a R y g u 39 o v Mountain i s i n v 41 R R e City iv r Jarbidge Peak 12 46N 46N e 45N 45N 2 *Capitol Peak 34 r * Matterhorn C O * re w ek No y Copper Mtn. rth h n Fo e o R rk e * m 33B 37 l i L R 45N a 44N 30A v it S e t iv r 45N le e 7 H r 4 u m Su 44N 38 n Cr n bo eek ÷ø140 l 0 n d i t 44N 40 u 68 9 Q Granite Peak 35 Wildhorse 43N 33A 1 8 29 44N * Reservoir 9 3 Vya 43N U M 43N 43N a r 42N Orovada ys Santa Rosa Peak 30B * T 27 42N 42N *McAfee Peak 14 67 41N Jacks Peak A 42N S * ou R th N F i v o o 41N r e r k r t L h 189B 189C i t 189A H tl 40N Chimney e 41N 41N H Reservoir u F 15 m r o 25 e Tecoma r 42 v b 40N i k R o 44 l d t 36 40N R i u 39N v H mboldt 40N 69 e r r e v H U M B O L D T i 26 93 189D 39N R ÷ø225 ¢¡ t Montello l d 63 o b 39N 39N 32 m u E L K O 38N R H i v e 38N e r n l t in t ÷ø233 u i Q L Cobre 38N 31 95 Wells 38N ¢¡ 66 37N 37N 16 Ma 28 gg ie 80 37N ¨¦§ Oasis Pilot Peak A 37N * 36N C 36N I r R e e o k c Hole in the k 36N 36N Winnemucca *Mtn. Peak 35N N 17 35N 35N 43 191 24 62 51 50 ÷ø228 ¢¡93 C 70 64 re r ek e iv Elko R R 34N t d 34N l 80 o 188 b ¨¦§ 65 m 49 u H 34N 34N O 18 61 West Wendover 33N 23 Carlin 45 177 33N 33N So F 72 Rye Patch uth F 33N 71 ork Reservoir H u m I b 32N 32N Battle Mountain 52 South Fork o Gerlach ld t Reservoir R iv 32N e 80 32N r L ¨¦§ 80 60 ¨¦§ Humbol iver ÷ø447 dt R ALT 31N 21 *Spruce Mtn. ¢¡93 31N 48 46 A 31N 31N 30N 192 ÷ø306 30N C W A S H O E 187 22 131 30N P E R S H I N G 30N 59 98 ÷ø305 *Tipton Peak Green Mountain 29N * ¢¡93 29N Franklin 176 178A 79 Lake 54 73A 29N 29N 28N 19 20 28N 47 186B 78 129 Currie 28N 73 28N 130 Pearl Peak 27N 81 L A N D E R E U R E K A * 80 27N Lovelock Ruby 132 27N Marshes e 27N k a 186A L 26N 97 26N £ £ a ø÷278 18E Pyramid c 26N 66E 68E c 65E 69E 70E 19E 20E 22E 26N 48E 58E 59E 60E 62E 63E 64E 67E 23E u 24E 25E 47E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 56E 57E 61E Lake 26E 27E 28E 29E 30E 31E 44E 54E 55E m 32E 33E 34E 35E 36E 37E 38E 39E 40E 41E 42E 43E 45E 46E e Humboldt n 25N 25N 96 n Lake ÷ø447 i 101A W 25N 58 53 25N 24N 95 24N 193 24N 24N 55 99 ÷ø445 Roberts Creek Mtn. 23N 23N 74 93 185 94 Christina Peak A 77 * 178B ¢¡ 0 * 0 ÷ø446 1 23N 128 23N ÷ø447 22N 22N 84 75 93 57 138 153 W H I T E 0 0 22N 194 1 92A 22N 21N 82 *Mt. Callaghan 21N 92B 85 395 175 179 ¤£ Fernley 21N A 305 21N 0 ÷ø 0 1 86 20N 20N 139 Diamond Peak Sparks er * Reno iv 20N 133 50 20N 80 R 76 ¤£ T ¨¦§ 83 ruc e C H U R C H I L L k e *Mt. Augusta Eureka 19N P I N E 19N 50 101 Austin 87 ¤£ 154 STOREY Fallon 19N Silver Springs 19N 152 18N ¢¡395 North Schell Peak 18N £50 McGill * 91 Lahonton Antelope Peak 18N ¤ Mt. Rose Res. 18N * 88 56 Taft Peak 17N *÷ø431 Desatoya Peak *Summit Mtn. * 184 102 17N * * 17N * Virginia City Carson 50 126 South Schell Peak Slide Mtn. ¤£ Washoe Lake 127 Ruth 16N Lake 134 Bald Mtn. 17N *Mt. Moriah 90 * Ely *Cleve Creek Baldy 89 Bunker Hill 16N 50 151 174 195 £ 103 L Y O N 125 er * ¤ 16N v ø÷722 i *Mt. Hamilton Carson R 16N e o 140A r r h City lke R Cave Mtn. 15N e a iv 95 a e v r * i W ¢¡ T R North Shoshone Peak Ward Mtn. 104 124 e * 15N * *Ninemile Peak 6 k 15N ¢¡ a 155A Toiyabe Range Peak L * 14N 14N 123 ¤£50 n so White Rock Mountain 6 Buck Mtn. r South Shoshone Peak Savory Mtn. £ Baker a * ¤ C * * 14N ** 14N *Masket Peak Bald Mtn. 13N 13N 13 1/2N Wheeler Peak D O U G L A S *Wildcat Peak * ÷ø487 e 93 Minden Pyramid Peak s ¢¡ * Artesia Yerington e 137B * East Peak Gardnerville Schurz 13N e Lake R ÷ø339 Mt. Washington 12N Mt. Siegel * 12N r Currant Mtn. £ E ve £ i 13N 19E 105 2 R Lincoln Peak 108 / 12N win * * 1 T ÷ø379 * 70E 110A ork 59E 69E 1 White Pine 88 Gabbs F 67E 68E 20E 21E 22E 23E 24E 26E 3 36E . 63E 66E UV 25E 27E 28E N Peak 60E 61E 62E 64E 65E er 29E 30E 31E 32E 34E 40E 41E k * 58E *Granite Peak 33E r 57E alk 35E 37E 38E 39E o 12N 56E W F 42E 43E 44E 155B 11N 11N . 395 r S 45E 46E 47E 54E ¤£ ve Arc Dome 48E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 55E i rk R * o 106 F 107 122 11N 10N 150 st Wellington r South Summit e e e ÷ø208 W v 10N i k 11N R * Topaz a 135 Currant L Round Mountain 173B Mt. Grafton Lake r * e 110B 140B 10N r k 10N e l k a l a 9N 9N W W 9N 207 180 ÷ø376 155C 9N ÷ø338 Mt. Grant 8N 8N * Hawthorne ÷ø361 k 95 121B 109 r o ¢¡ *East Sister ÷ø318 F Luning 8N N Y E 8N 7N 7N East Corey Peak 183 * ÷ø359 110C 121A ¢¡6 196 7N 137A 7N 6N 6N Mina 120 M I N E R A L 6N 156 6N Beauty Peak * Troy Peak r e 5N v 5N i * 111A R Brawley Peaks 136 * 5N 5N 4N 111B 119 201 4N ÷ø360 149 ÷ø375 95 Warm Springs 112 ¢¡ 4N 4N ¢¡6 202 3N 3N 113 114 141 3N 3N ¢¡93 2N Coaldale Tonopah 2N 118 ¢¡95 181 Government* 2N 2N 172 Peak 115 6 200 ¢¡ 208 e Pioche t 1N 1N Kawich Peak i * h 116 95 173A 171 W 199 1N ¢¡ 1N * Highland Peak 198 1S 1S E 2 £ / E Boundary Peak 1 2 1S 69E 70E 71E / 65E 67E 68E * 0 142 £ 64E 66E 1 58E 60E 61E 63E 38E 4 1S 55E 56E 59E 62E 34E 35E 1 53E 54E 57E 33E 36E 5 37E 39E 40E 41E 42E 43E 44E 45E 46E 47E 48E 49E 50E 51E 52E ÷ø319 203 Panaca 197 2S U 2S 117 Goldfield 148 2S 170 L I N C O L N 2S 3S T Cedar Peak* 3S 143 3S Mt. Irish A * 93 Caliente 3S Hiko ¢¡ HYDROGRAPHIC REGIONS OF NEVADA 4S 4S H E S M E R A L D A 145 4S 4S ÷ø375 5S *Quartzite Mountain 182 204 5S 144 147 157 1 5S 3 *Bald Mtn. 2 11 ø÷266 209 6S 6S *Magruder Mtn. HUMBOLDT 158A 6S Alamo ELKO 7S E 7S Scottys Junction O 169A H 7S R 4 A S PERSHING E 8S K A D E 206 W N ÷ø267 146 R 8S 232 8S A U L 7 5 E 205 9S 9S 221 231 228 6 9S 8 10S CHURCHILL 10S 227B 158B 210 WHITE 159 10S LYON 11S PINE 93 D 11S 169B ¢¡ O 11S U G L 10 1. NORTHWEST REGION A 12S S 9 Beatty 168 MINERAL 2. BLACK ROCK DESERT REGION 12S 12S 160 Mesquite NYE 3. SNAKE RIVER BASIN 13S 222 219 13S ¢¡95 229 227A 13S 161 ¨¦§15 4. HUMBOLDT RIVER BASIN er v A i ESMERALDA 12 m R a 220 in 14S rg g LINCOLN o Moapa ir 5. WEST CENTRAL REGION 14S sa V R 14S iv 226 e M r u 15S Hayford Peak dd y River ÷ø169 6. TRUCKEE RIVER BASIN Amargosa Valley * 15S 225 211 7. WESTERN REGION 15S Indian Springs A C *Sheep Peak 8.
Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions

    Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions

    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
  • Julia's Unequivocal Nevada Klampout

    Julia's Unequivocal Nevada Klampout

    Julia's Unequivocal Nevada Klampout #35 JARBIDGE clamper year 6019 Brought to you by Julia C. Bulette chapter 1864, E Clampus Vitus Researched and interpreted by Jeffrey D. Johnson XNGH, Clamphistorian at chapter 1864 Envisioned by Noble Grand Humbug Bob Stransky Dedicated to Young Golddigging Widders and Old Orphans 2014 c.e. Why Why yes, Jarbidge is a ''fer piece'' from any place. This year's junk trip has the unique quirk that it is not in the Great Basin like the rest of our territory. Northern Elko County is drained by the tributaries of the Owyhee, Bruneau and Jarbidge Rivers. They flow in to the Snake River and out to the sea. To the South the range is drained by the North Fork of the Humboldt and in the East, St. Mary's River. Geology The North American Continental plate moves at a rate of one inch a year in a Southwesterly direction. Underneath the plate is a volcanic hotspot or mantle plume. 10 to 12 million years ago the hotspot was just North of the Idaho border. Over that time it has moved, leaving a trail of volcanic debris and ejectamenta from McDermitt Nevada, East. Now the Yellowstone Caldera area is over the plume. During the middle and late Miocene, a sequence of ash flows, enormous lava flows and basalt flows from 40 odd shield volcanoes erupted from the Bruneau-Jarbidge caldera. The eruptive center has mostly been filled in by lava flows and lacustrine and fluvial sediments. Two hundred Rhinos, five different species of horse, three species of cameloids, saber tooth deer and other fauna at Ashfall Fossil Beds 1000 miles downwind to the East in Nebraska, were killed by volcanic ash from the Bruneau Jarbidge Caldera.
  • Moüjmtaiim Operations

    Moüjmtaiim Operations

    L f\f¿ áfó b^i,. ‘<& t¿ ytn) ¿L0d àw 1 /1 ^ / / /This publication contains copyright material. *FM 90-6 FieW Manual HEADQUARTERS No We DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC, 30 June 1980 MOÜJMTAIIM OPERATIONS PREFACE he purpose of this rUanual is to describe how US Army forces fight in mountain regions. Conditions will be encountered in mountains that have a significant effect on. military operations. Mountain operations require, among other things^ special equipment, special training and acclimatization, and a high decree of self-discipline if operations are to succeed. Mountains of military significance are generally characterized by rugged compartmented terrain witn\steep slopes and few natural or manmade lines of communication. Weather in these mountains is seasonal and reaches across the entireSspectrum from extreme cold, with ice and snow in most regions during me winter, to extreme heat in some regions during the summer. AlthoughNthese extremes of weather are important planning considerations, the variability of weather over a short period of time—and from locality to locahty within the confines of a small area—also significantly influences tactical operations. Historically, the focal point of mountain operations has been the battle to control the heights. Changes in weaponry and equipment have not altered this fact. In all but the most extreme conditions of terrain and weather, infantry, with its light equipment and mobility, remains the basic maneuver force in the mountains. With proper equipment and training, it is ideally suited for fighting the close-in battfe commonly associated with mountain warfare. Mechanized infantry can\also enter the mountain battle, but it must be prepared to dismount and conduct operations on foot.
  • Porphyry and Other Molybdenum Deposits of Idaho and Montana

    Porphyry and Other Molybdenum Deposits of Idaho and Montana

    Porphyry and Other Molybdenum Deposits of Idaho and Montana Joseph E. Worthington Idaho Geological Survey University of Idaho Technical Report 07-3 Moscow, Idaho ISBN 1-55765-515-4 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Molybdenum Vein Deposits ...................................................................... 2 Tertiary Molybdenum Deposits ................................................................. 2 Little Falls—1 ............................................................................. 3 CUMO—2 .................................................................................. 3 Red Mountain Prospect—45 ...................................................... 3 Rocky Bar District—43 .............................................................. 3 West Eight Mile—37 .................................................................. 3 Devil’s Creek Prospect—46 ....................................................... 3 Walton—8 .................................................................................. 4 Ima—3 ........................................................................................ 4 Liver Peak (a.k.a. Goat Creek)—4 ............................................. 4 Bald Butte—5 ............................................................................. 5 Big Ben—6 ................................................................................. 6 Emigrant Gulch—7 ...................................................................
  • Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist

    Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist

    STATE OF NEVADA Steve Sisolak, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Staff Specialist Pat Jackson, Predator Management Staff Specialist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Sarah Hale Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Matt Jeffress Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2018-2019 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
  • Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview

    Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Ginny Bengston CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 12 2003 SWCA ENVIROHMENTAL CON..·S:.. .U LTt;NTS . iitew.a,e.El t:ti.r B'i!lt e.a:b ~f l-amd :Nf'arat:1.iern'.~nt N~:¥G~GI Sl$i~-'®'ffl'c~. P,rceP,GJ r.ei l l§y. SWGA.,,En:v,ir.e.m"me'Y-tfol I €on's.wlf.arats NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Submitted to BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Nevada State Office 1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89520-0008 Submitted by SWCA, INC. Environmental Consultants 5370 Kietzke Lane, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 826-1700 Prepared by Ginny Bengston SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 02-551 December 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................v List of Appendixes ............................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 CHAPTER 2. ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW .....................................4 Northern Paiute ............................................................4 Habitation Patterns .......................................................8 Subsistence .............................................................9 Burial Practices ........................................................11
  • Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping

    Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping

    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Yellowstone National Park This document summarizes the results of a geologic resource evaluation scoping session that was held at Yellowstone National Park on May 16–17, 2005. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. In addition to GRD staff, participants included park staff and cooperators from the U.S. Geological Survey and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Participants of Yellowstone’s GRE Scoping Session Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Bob Volcanologist, USGS–Menlo Park 650-329-5201 [email protected] Christiansen Geologist/GRE Program GIS Lead, NPS Tim Connors 303-969-2093 [email protected] Geologic Resources Division Data Stewardship Coordinator, Greater Rob Daley 406-994-4124 [email protected] Yellowstone Network Supervisory Geologist, Yellowstone Hank Heasler 307-344-2441 [email protected] National Park Geologist, NPS Geologic Resources Bruce Heise 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division Cheryl Geologist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-2208 [email protected] Jaworowski Katie Geologist/Senior Research Associate, 970-586-7243 [email protected] KellerLynn Colorado State University Branch Chief, NPS Geologic Resources Carol McCoy 303-969-2096 [email protected] Division Ken Pierce Surficial Geologist, USGS–Bozeman 406-994-5085 [email protected] Supervisory GIS Specialist, Yellowstone Anne Rodman 307-344-7381 [email protected] National Park Shannon GIS Specialist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-7381 [email protected] Savage Monday, May 16, involved a welcome to Yellowstone National Park and an introduction to the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program, including status of reports and digital maps.
  • Water Resources-Reconnaissance Series Report 54

    Water Resources-Reconnaissance Series Report 54

    STATE OF NEVADA ·DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Carson City / Photograph by Lawrence Radiation Laboratory· Sedan Crater was formed in the dry a ll uv ium of Yucca Flat by on underground atomic detonation. WATER RESOURCES-RECONNAISSANCE SERIES REPORT 54 REGIONAL GROUND-WATER SYSTEMS IN THE NEVADA TEST SITE AREA, NYE, LINCOLN, AND CLARK COUNTIES, NEVADA By F. Eugene Rush Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior 1970 WATER RESOURCES - RECONNAISSANCE: SEJUES REPORT 54 ·. REGIONAL GROUND-WATER SYSTEMS·IN THE NEVADA TEST SITE AREA, NYE, LINCOLN, AND CLARK COUN'riE:S, NEVADA By F. Eugene Rush PreparBd cooperatively by the Geological Survey, u.s. Department of the Interior 1971 -\ FOREWORD The progr~m of reconnaissance water-resources studies was authorized by the 1960 Legislature to be carried on by Division of Water Resources of the Departc.ment of· Conservation and Natural Resources in cooperation with the u.s. Geological Survey. This report is the 54th in the series to be prepared by the staff of the Nevada District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey. These 54 reports describe the hydrology of 185 valleys. The reconnaissance surveys make available pertinent information of great and immediate value to many State and Federal agencies, the State cooperating agency, and the public. As development takes place in any area, ,]c,,mands for more detailed information will arise, and studies to supply such information will be undertaken. In the meantime, these reconnaissance studies are timely and adequately In<'eet tlle immediate needs for information on the wate.r resources of the areas covered by the reports.
  • Geology of the Granite Peak Stock Area, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona

    Geology of the Granite Peak Stock Area, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona

    Geology of the Granite Peak stock area, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors DeRuyter, Vernon Donald Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 05:09:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555132 GEOLOGY OF THE GRANITE PEAK STOCK AREA, WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS, COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA by Vernon Donald DeRuyter A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 9 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of require­ ments for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Re­ quests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major de­ partment or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the pro­ posed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
  • Backcountry Discovery Trail

    Backcountry Discovery Trail

    Have you ever wanted to get into the backcountry Backcountry of a National Forest? Have you wondered if you have Discovery Trail what it takes? Rest assured: exploring the backcountry doesn’t necessarily require an ATV or a dirt bike. You can do it in a high clearance vehicle or a 4WD sport utility vehicle. This guide gives directions for the route from point to point, gives tips on what to bring and how to prepare, provides background information on history and general topics, and directs travelers to points of interest along the way. This 150-mile-long discovery trail is a perfect place to begin your explorations of the Plumas National Forest! Plumas National Forest Plumas National Forest Backcountry Discovery Trail The Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail is published by the USDA Forest Service, in cooperation with the California State Parks OHV Division. Printed in the USA 2013 ISBN: Welcome to the Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail The Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail (BDT) invites exploration of the remote areas of the Plumas National Forest. You can expect rough road conditions on gravel and dirt roads and a slow pace of travel, maybe only 30-50 miles a day. Be prepared for downed trees or rocks on the road, rough and rocky surfaces, and brush encroaching on the road- way. Much of the route is under snow in the winter and early spring. There are no restaurants, grocery stores, or gas stations along the main route and cell phone coverage is intermittent. The non-paved roads are currently maintained for travel by sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and high-clearance vehicles.
  • Position Outreach Announcement

    Position Outreach Announcement

    USDA FOREST SERVICE INTERMOUNTAIN REGION, R4 HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST AUSTIN/TONOPAH RANGER DISTRICTS Rangeland Management Specialist December 17, 2009 About thePosition… The Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest will soon be filling a Rangeland Management Specialist position, GS-0454-5/7/9, located in Austin, Nevada on the Austin/Tonopah Ranger Districts. The Austin/Tonopah Ranger Districts administer grazing on 47 cattle allotments and 2 sheep allotments. The Districts also manage thirteen wild horse and burro territories. This position offers a variety of opportunities for individuals to develop skills and enjoy a variety of challenging experiences. Are you Interested? Interested applicants, or those desiring further information, should contact Steven Williams, Austin/Tonopah District Ranger, at (775) 964-2671 or email at: [email protected] ; or Heather Mobley 775-964-2671 or email at [email protected] For additional Forest and District information, check out the H-T website… http://www.fs.fed.us/htnf/ The Forest … At over 6.3 million acres, the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest is the largest National Forest in the contiguous United States. The Forest spans the entire state of Nevada, with one million acres of land in the eastern part of California, along the Eastern Sierra Front. The Districts … The Austin/Tonopah Ranger Districts have two offices one in Austin and the other in Tonopah, Nevada. The Districts are managed as one unit under one District Ranger, with employees working out of both offices. The Austin/Tonopah Ranger Districts are responsible for the management of approximately 2.2 million acres of National Forest System Lands.
  • 2013-9-19 Water System Plan Figure

    2013-9-19 Water System Plan Figure

    DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BASINS OF NEVADA £ * # £ OREGON £ IDAHO 47N £ 11 J k Jackpot 10 a 24E e 18E 19E 25E r 20E 21E 5 e McDermitt b 22E 23E 26E 28E Denio r 47N 27E i Owyhee d C £ g 69E 70E 1 e 68E 6 55E 66E 67E 47N 62E 63E 64E 65E 46N 44E 45E 46E 47E 48E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 56E 57E 58E 59E 60E 61E 541/2E 231/2E 30E 31E 33E 54E 47N 13 VU140 32E 34E 35E 36E 37E 38E 39E 40E 41E 42E B 43E ru C K n a r e n 46N i Falls n a R 39 y e g u o v Mountain n s i i 41 12 v R R i e Jarbidge Peak City v r * 45N e 2 *Capitol Peak 34 46N r 46N * Matterhorn C O re ek 45N N w ort y Copper Mtn. h h n Fo e * o rk e R 33B 37 lm 44N 30A i L R 45N a 140 v it i S 4 VU e tl v r e e 7 45N H r u Su 44N m 38 n Cre n bo ek n ld 40 i 68 t u 35 Q Granite Peak Wildhorse 44N 43N 3 33A * 190 8 29 Reservoir 9 44N 43N Vya UTAH M ar 42N Orovada* 43N ys 30B 43N Santa Rosa Peak 27 42N *McAfee Peak 14 67 41N *Jacks Peak 42N S 42N o R uth N i v F o 41N o e r r r k t 189B h 189C L 189A i t t 40N l 41N 15 Chimney e 41N Reservoir H F o u 25 r r Tecoma e m k 42 40N iv 44 b R o l Humb d 36 oldt t R 40N 69 i 39N v 40N r e 93 H U M B O L D T r e ¤£ 26 v 189D i 39N R Montello t 63 ld o 39N 32 b E L K O m R 233 38N 39N u i VU v H e r 225 38N e VU n l n t i t u 95 i Q ¤£ L 31 38N 16 38N 66 Cobre 37N 37N Wells Ma 80 28 gg i ¨¦§ e 37N Pilot Peak* 37N Oasis 36N 36N C r 93 R e ¤£ o e c k Hole in the k 36N * 24 36N Mtn.