DOCSLIB.ORG

2013-9-19 Water System Plan Figure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2013-9-19 Water System Plan Figure DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BASINS OF NEVADA £ * # £ OREGON £ IDAHO 47N £ 11 J k Jackpot 10 a 24E e 18E 19E 25E r 20E 21E 5 e McDermitt b 22E 23E 26E 28E Denio r 47N 27E i Owyhee d C £ g 69E 70E 1 e 68E 6 55E 66E 67E 47N 62E 63E 64E 65E 46N 44E 45E 46E 47E 48E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 56E 57E 58E 59E 60E 61E 541/2E 231/2E 30E 31E 33E 54E 47N 13 VU140 32E 34E 35E 36E 37E 38E 39E 40E 41E 42E B 43E ru C K n a r e n 46N i Falls n a R 39 y e g u o v Mountain n s i i 41 12 v R R i e Jarbidge Peak City v r * 45N e 2 *Capitol Peak 34 46N r 46N * Matterhorn C O re ek 45N N w ort y Copper Mtn. h h n Fo e * o rk e R 33B 37 lm 44N 30A i L R 45N a 140 v it i S 4 VU e tl v r e e 7 45N H r u Su 44N m 38 n Cre n bo ek n ld 40 i 68 t u 35 Q Granite Peak Wildhorse 44N 43N 3 33A * 190 8 29 Reservoir 9 44N 43N Vya UTAH M ar 42N Orovada* 43N ys 30B 43N Santa Rosa Peak 27 42N *McAfee Peak 14 67 41N *Jacks Peak 42N S 42N o R uth N i v F o 41N o e r r r k t 189B h 189C L 189A i t t 40N l 41N 15 Chimney e 41N Reservoir H F o u 25 r r Tecoma e m k 42 40N iv 44 b R o l Humb d 36 oldt t R 40N 69 i 39N v 40N r e 93 H U M B O L D T r e ¤£ 26 v 189D i 39N R Montello t 63 ld o 39N 32 b E L K O m R 233 38N 39N u i VU v H e r 225 38N e VU n l n t i t u 95 i Q ¤£ L 31 38N 16 38N 66 Cobre 37N 37N Wells Ma 80 28 gg i ¨¦§ e 37N Pilot Peak* 37N Oasis 36N 36N C r 93 R e ¤£ o e c k Hole in the k 36N * 24 36N Mtn. Peak 17 Winnemucca 43 191 35N 35N 62 51 50 64 C 70 r re e ek 35N iv VU228 R 35N t d 34N l 34N o 80 b 65 188 ¨¦§ m 49 u Elko H 34N 18 34N 61 23 West Wendover 33N 45 177 33N 33N 72 South Rye Patch Fo 71 52 rk Reservoir 33N Carlin H u Gerlach m 21 b 32N o 32N Battle Mountain South Fork l d t 80 Reservoir R ¨¦§ iv 32N e 32N ¨¦§80 60 r Hu r mboldt Rive 31N VU447 Spruce Mtn. 31N * ¤£93A 48 46 31N W A S H O E 31N 30N 192 30N £93 VU306 ¤ 187 CALIFORNIA 22 79 98 131 59 30N 30N * Tipton Peak Green Mountain 29N * 29N VU305 Franklin 176 178A 54 Lake P E R S H I N G 73A 29N 19 29N 20 28N 28N 47 186B 78 129 Currie 73 130 L A N D E R 28N 28N E U R E K A Pearl Peak 27N 81 * 80 27N Lovelock 132 Ruby 27N Marshes 97 27N 186A 26N VU278 26N £ 18E Pyramid £ 19E 20E 26N 26N 65E 67E 68E 69E 70E 22E 23E 24E 25E 56E 57E 58E 59E 60E 61E 62E 63E 64E 66E Lake 26E 27E 28E 29E 30E 31E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 54E 55E 32E 33E 34E 35E 36E 37E 38E 39E 40E 41E 42E 43E 44E 45E 46E 47E 48E Humboldt 25N 25N 96 Lake 101A 58 Winnemucca Lake 53 25N VU447 25N 95 24N 24N 93 ¤£ 193 55 24N 99 VU445 24N 23N 74 Roberts Creek Mtn. 185 23N 94 77 * * Christina Peak 178B VU446 100A 128 23N 23N 22N 22N 93 84 75 57 138 153 W H I T E VU447 22N 194 100 92A 22N 21N 82 * Mt. Callaghan 21N 92B 85 179 ¤£395 C H U R C H I L L 175 21N 21N 100A 20N 86 Fernley VU305 184 20N 139 * Diamond Peak Sparks er 76 Reno iv 133 ¤£50 80 R 20N 20N Tr ¨¦§ 83 * 19N uc k ee Mt. Augusta P I N E 95A Eureka 19N ¤£ 50 101 87 ¤£ Austin 154 STOREY Fallon 152 19N 395 19N 18N ¤£ Silver Springs * North Schell Peak 18N £50 McGill 91 Lahonton ¤ Res. 56 * Antelope Peak Mt. Rose* 88 18N * 18N *Taft Peak 17N U431 * Desatoya Peak Summit Mtn. * V* 102 17N Virginia City Carson 50 126 South Schell Peak Slide Mtn. ¤£ Washoe Lake 127 134 Ruth * 16N Lake * Bald Mtn. 17N Mt. Moriah 90 17N Ely *Cleve Creek Baldy 89 16N 50 *Bunker Hill 151 174 ¤£ r 103 L Y O N 125 722 e * VU v i Mt. Hamilton 16N R Carson 140A 16N er Cave Mtn. City r lk Ri 95 * 195 15N e a ve ¤£ v W r 15N i 95A 124 North Shoshone Peak *Ward Mtn. 104 R ¤£ * * Ninemile Peak 15N 155A 15N 6 * Toiyabe Range Peak ¤£ Lake Tahoe 14N 14N Weber 123 ¤£50 n Res. 6 o White Rock Mountain Savory Mtn. £ Buck Mtn. s * ¤ r South Shoshone Peak * Baker a * * * C 14N 14N * Masket Peak Bald Mtn. 13N 13N D O U G L A S * * Wheeler Peak Wildcat Peak 13 1/2N ¤£93 VU487 Minden e *Pyramid Peak * Artesia s Yerington Schurz e 137B East Peak Gardnerville e Lake 12N 13N R * Mt. Washington Mt. Siegel VU339 12N r Currant Mtn. ive 13N £ £ 19E 105 * * 108 in R 379 *Lincoln Peak 88 Tw ÷ø 70E !" 110A ork 69E 20E F White Pine 21E 22E 23E 24E Gabbs12N . 65E 66E 67E 68E 25E 26E 27E 28E N * 61E 62E 63E 64E * Granite Peak 29E 30E 31 1/2E 32E Peak lker 31E 33E 34E 39E 40E 41E rk 56E 57E 58E 59E 60E Wa 35E 36E 37E 38E o 42E 44E 155B 12N 11N er F 43E 11N 395 iv . ¤£ R Arc Dome S 45E 46E 49E 51E 52E 53E 54E 55E k * 47E 48E 50E r o 106 F 107 122 11N 150 208 st Wellington South Summit øVU e r W e * 11N 10N v i 10N R 135 Round Mountain Currant Topaz 173B *Mt. Grafton Lake 110B 140B r 10N 10N e k l a 9N 9N Walker Lake 180 VU338 W 9N 9N ÷ø376 155C *Mt. Grant VU361 8N 8N Hawthorne 121B k 95 207 183 * 109 r ¤£ VU318 196 East Sister o ø F Luning N Y E 8N 8N 7N 7N East *Corey Peak 110C 121A ¤£6 VU359 7N 137A 7N 6N Mina 6N M I N E R A L120 156 6N 6N Beauty Peak * Troy Peak r * 5N e 5N v 111A i Brawley Peaks R * 136 5N 5N VU360 4N 111B 119 201 4N 149 112 Warm Springs 4N VU375 4N 202 3N ¤£95 ¤£6 93 3N 113 114 141 ¤£ 3N 3N 2N Coaldale ¤£95 Tonopah 2N 118 181 * 172 Government 1 2N 200 Peak 15 ¤£6 2N Pioche 208 e 1N * t 1N Kawich Peak i 116 171 h 199 173A W * 95 1N Highland Peak 1N ¤£ 198 1S 1S £ HYDROGRAPHIC REGIONS OF NEVADA *Boundary Peak 71E 142 67E 68E 69E 70E £ 1S 1S 62E 63E 64E 65E 66E 58E 59E 60E 61E 33E 34E 52E 53E 54E 55E 56E 57E 319 35E 36E 37E 38E 51E 51 1/2E VU 39E 40E 40 1/2E 41E 42E 43E 44E 45E 46E 47E 48E 49E 50E 203 Panaca 197 2S UTAH 2S 117 148 170 L I N C O L N 2S Goldfield Cedar Peak 2S * 3S 1 3 3S 143 * 2 11 3S Mt. Irish 3S Hiko ¤£93 Caliente HUMBOLDT 4S ELKO 4S E S M E R A L D A 145 4S 4S ÷ø375 204 * Quartzite Mountain 182 5S 4 5S 144 PERSHING 147 157 5S *Bald Mtn. VU266 6S WASHOE 209 6S * Magruder Mtn. 158A LANDER 7 5 EUREKA 6S Alamo 7S 7S 6 Scottys Junction 169A WHITE 7S 8 205 8S CHURCHILL PINE VU267 146 206 8S 232 LYON 1. NORTHWEST REGION 8S D 9S O 2. BLACK ROCK DESERT REGION 221 U 9S 228 G 231 L A 10 3. SNAKE RIVER BASIN 9S S ¤£93 9 4. HUMBOLDT RIVER BASIN 227B 158B 10S MINERAL 10S 159 NYE 5. WEST CENTRAL REGION 10S 169B 210 222 11S 6. TRUCKEE RIVER BASIN 11S 11S ESMERALDA 12 7. WESTERN REGION 12S LINCOLN Beatty 168 12S 8. CARSON RIVER BASIN 160 12S Mesquite 13S 9. WALKER RIVER BASIN 13S 219 95 227A 161 15 ¤£ 229 13S ¨¦§ er 10. CENTRAL REGION iv A m R a 220 in 14S rg rg o Moapa i 11. GREAT SALT LAKE BASIN 14S sa V 14 R iv 226 14S M e Hayford Peak 13 r u * d 12. ESCALANTE DESERT BASIN d y River VU169 Amargosa Valley 211 15S CLARK 15S 225 13. COLORADO RIVER BASIN 15S Indian Springs Sheep Peak ARI CAL * 14. DEATH VALLEY BASIN 16S 16S 217 VU373 230 16S ¤£95 ¤£93 VU160 17S I 17S FORNI 17S Z 216 218 18S C L A R K £ 18S ON £ 18S 61E 62E 63E 64E 65E 66E 70E 71E 50E 52E 53E 54E 55E 56E 57E 58E 59E 60E 67E 68E 69E 51E 224 19S 19S *Charleston Peak 212 ¨¦§15 215 223 19S Pahrump Overton Arm 20S 20S A A VU372 162 20S Las Vegas r e v i R 21S Mead 95 Lake 21S ¤£ o d a r o 21S l Henderson 22S22S o ADMINISTRATIVE GROUNDWATER BASINS C 160 22S VU VU146 £ 22S Boulder City 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Management Plan for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Approved April 30, 2013
    Management Plan for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Approved April 30, 2013 Prepared by the Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership Baker, Nevada i ii Great Basin National Heritage Area Management Plan September 23, 2011 Plans prepared previously by several National Heritage Areas provided inspiration for the framework and format for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Management Plan. National Park Service staff and documents provided guidance. We gratefully acknowledge these contributions. This Management Plan was made possible through funding provided by the National Park Service, the State of Nevada, the State of Utah and the generosity of local citizens. 2011 Great Basin National Heritage Area Disclaimer Restriction of Liability The Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership (GBHAP) and the authors of this document have made every reasonable effort to insur e accuracy and objectivity in preparing this plan. However, based on limitations of time, funding and references available, the parties involved make no claims, promises or guarantees about the absolute accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this document and expressly disclaim liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this plan. No warranty of any kind, implied, expressed or statutory, including but not limited to the warranties of non-infringement of third party rights, title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, is given with respect to the contents of this document or its references. Reference in this document to any specific commercial products, processes, or services, or the use of any trade, firm or corporation name is for the inf ormation and convenience of the public, and does not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the GBHAP or the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • LANDSCAPE NEWS Volume 16, Issue 2: February-March 2017
    Eastern Nevada Landscape Coalition LANDSCAPE NEWS Volume 16, Issue 2: February-March 2017 Weather Doesn’t Slow Winter Weed Conference On January 11-12, 2017, ENLC and Tri-County Weed successfully hosted their 12th Annual Winter Weed Conference. We had over 90 registered participants, and even though Mother Nature decided to throw some wicked weather at the West, the majority of registrants and presenters made it through blizzards and floods to attend the conference. We were fortunate to have generous presenters who were willing to fill in and do additional presentations for presenters who were unable to get through the weather to make the conference. Instead of detailing the highlights of the conference, we have included several of the presenter’s abstracts below. If you would like a copy of their PowerPoint presentations please contact the ENLC office. The presentations covered a wide range of topics from updates by the Nevada Department of Agriculture and laws and regulations to mapping and control Jani Ahlvers (right) and John Watt of ENLC. presentations on curly dock, Russian olive, tamarisk, ventenata, and viper grass. increasing infestations are wide-ranging, but all have one thing in common: the need to know the location Spatial Imagery Solutions for Identifying, and extent(s) of the invasives of interest. One very Mapping, and Monitoring Invasive Species in the effective, and efficient, solution for addressing this Great Basin, Jeff Campbell spatial need is the utilization of multi-spectral spatial Contact: [email protected] imagery. The plethora of satellite and aerial based Over the last century, increased human activity sources of imagery affords resource managers of today across the west, and particularly throughout the Great a valuable set of tools for mapping invasive species Basin, has resulted in an ever-changing landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Ants of Nevada
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 38 Number 4 Article 2 12-31-1978 Mountain ants of Nevada George C. Wheeler Adjunct Research Associate, Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada Jeanette Wheeler Adjunct Research Associate, Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Wheeler, George C. and Wheeler, Jeanette (1978) "Mountain ants of Nevada," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 38 : No. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol38/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. MOUNTAIN ANTS OF NEVADA George C. Wheeler' and Jeanette Wheeler' Abstract.- Introductory topics include "The High Altitude Environment," "Ants Recorded from High Alti- tudes," "Adaptations of Ants," "Mountain Ants of North America," and "The Mountains of Nevada." A Nevada mountain ant species is defined as one that inhabits the Coniferous Forest Biome or Alpine Biome or the ecotone between them. A table gives a taxonomic list of the mountain ants and shows the biomes in which they occur; it also indicates whether they occur in lower biomes. This list comprises 50 species, which is 28 percent of the ant fauna we have found in Nevada. Only 30 species (17 percent of the fauna) are exclusively montane; these are in the genera Mymiica, Manica, Stenamma, Leptothorax, Camponottis, Lasiiis, and Formica. The article concludes with "Records for Nevada Mountain Ants." All known records for each species are cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Fault Rupture Potential Resulting from Large-Scale Groundwater Withdrawal: Application to Spring Valley, Nevada
    University of Nevada, Reno Analysis of fault rupture potential resulting from large-scale groundwater withdrawal: application to Spring Valley, Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Hydrogeology By Brian Anderson Dr. Rina Schumer / Thesis Advisor August 2016 © by Brian J. Anderson 2016 All Rights Reserved THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by BRIAN J. ANDERSON Entitled Analysis of fault rupture potential resulting from large-scale groundwater withdrawal: application to Spring Valley, Nevada be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Rina Schumer, Ph.D., Advisor Scott McCoy, Ph.D., Committee Member William Hammond, Ph.D., Committee Member Alexandra Lutz, Ph.D., Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph. D., Dean, Graduate School August, 2016 i Abstract Hydrospheric mass changes create subsurface stress perturbations on a scale that can trigger seismic events or accelerate frequency of seismicity on proximal faults. For example, groundwater pumping has been implicated in the 2011 Mw 5.1 earthquake in Lorca, Spain and the 2010 Mw 7.1 El-Mayor Cucapah earthquake in northern Baja California. Previous work on effects of pumping on seismicity is retrospective. We propose a method to assess changes in rupture potential on faults near areas of large-scale groundwater withdrawal before pumping begins. Changes in potentiometric head due to pumping predicted by (MODFLOW) groundwater flow models can be used as the change in surface load input for analytical solutions from Boussinesq [1885] to resolve changes in the subsurface state of stress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Desert Sage OUR 77Th SEASON JULY–AUGUST 2018 ISSUE NO
    The Desert Sage OUR 77th SEASON JULY–AUGUST 2018 ISSUE NO. 376 http://desertpeaks.org/ In this issue: Chair’s Corner Chair’s Corner Page 2 by Tina Bowman DPS Leadership Page 3 DPS Trips and Events Pages 4-8 DPSers came Outings Chair Page 9 from far and near to Treasurer’s Report Page 9 the banquet held Conservation Chair Page 10 May 20th in New- Membership Report Page 10 bury Park. After be- DPS Chili Cook-off Pages 11-12 ing greeted and DPS Banquet Page 13 checked in by Kelley Trip Reports: Laxamana and Greg List Thoughts & Recollections Page 14-15 Gerlach, attendees Ryan Benchmark Pages 15-16 found themselves in Conglomerate Mesa Page 16 a wonderfully large Great Basin Peaks Section News Page 17 room with very high Revised DPS List Page 17 ceilings, which leant Desert Books Pages 18-21 itself well to pre- Letter to the Editor Page 21 dinner socializing. Those wanting to savor the slide DPS Merchandise Page 22 show put together by banquet chair Tracey Thom- Sierra Club Membership Application Page 23 erson could do so in the comfort of loungers. Jim DPS Membership Application Page 23 Fleming made a round of the miniature-golf course, DPS Info Page 24 and I wandered out to make sure he wasn’t cheat- ing. Besides photos of DPS peaks and climbers, THE NEXT SAGE SUBMISSION DEADLINE DPS trivia questions were sprinkled among the IS AUGUST 12, 2018 slides. We cheered for Jim Morehouse, recipient of The Desert Sage is published six times a year by the DPS Service Award, and were all enthralled by the Desert Peaks Section of the Angeles Chapter of Wynne Benti’s presentation on her desert activism, the Sierra Club.
    [Show full text]
  • Dpslist Revised April 2018 Gac2.Tb
    Sierra Club, Angeles Chapter Desert Peaks Section DPS PEAKS LIST 30th Edition, April 2018, 96 Peaks CHANGES from the edition dated April 2003: • Delist three peaks: Argus Peak, Maturango Peak, and Navajo Mountain • Suspend one peak: Edgar Peak INDEX Arc Dome — 6.3 Granite Mtns. #1 — 3.8 Mt. Stirling — 6.6 Rosa Pt. — 4.3 Avawatz Mtns. — 3.1 Granite Mtns. #2 — 4.10 Mt. Tipton — 8.1 Ruby Dome — 6.1 Baboquivari Peak — 8.9 Grapevine Peak — 2.12 Muddy Peak — 6.15 Guardian Angel — 7.2 Big Maria Mtns. — 4.12 Hayford Peak — 6.5 Mummy Mtn. — 6.8 Sandy Pt. — 2.2 Black Butte — 4.7 Humphreys Peak — 8.2 N. Guardian Angel — 7.1 Sentinel Peak — 2.8 Boundary Peak — 1.3 Indianhead — 5.1 Needle Peak — 2.11 Sheephole Mtns. — 3.11 Bridge Mtn. — 6.14 Jacumba Mtn. — 5.3 Nelson Range — 1.12 SIGNAL PEAK — 8.5 Brown Peak — 2.18 Keynot Peak — 1.9 New York Butte — 1.10 Smith Mtn. — 2.16 Canyon Pt. — 2.22 Kingston Peak — 3.2 New York Mtns. — 3.4 Sombrero Peak — 5.2 Castle Dome Peak — 8.6 Kino Peak — 8.7 Nopah Range — 2.21 Spectre Pt. — 4.9 Cerro Pescadores — 9.1 Last Chance Mtn. — 2.1 Old Dad Mtn. — 3.5 Spirit Mtn. — 6.11 Cerro Pinacate — 9.4 Manly Peak — 2.10 Old Woman Mtns. — 3.10 Stepladder Mtns. — 3.12 CHARLESTON PEAK — 6.7 Martinez Mtn. — 4.1 Orocopia Mtns. — 4. Stewart Pt. — 2.19 Chemehuevi Peak — 3.13 McCullough Mtn.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources-Reconnaissance
    View of Spring Valley looking northwest from the town site of Osceola I I WATER RESOURCES- RECONNAISSANCE SERIES REPORT 33 I WATER RESOURCES APPRAISAL OF SPRING VALLEY, I WHITE PINE AND LINCOLN COUNTIES, NEVADA By I F. EUGENE RUSH Geologist and I S. A. T. KAZMI Geologist I Prepared Cooperatively by the I Geolagicai Survey, U.S. Department of Interior JULY 1965 I I I WATER RESOURCES - RECONNAISSANCE SERIES I Report 33 I I WATER RESOURCES APPRAISAL OF SPRING VALLEY, WHITE PINE AND LINCOLN COUNTIES, NEVADA I By I F. Eugene Rush Geologist I and S. A. T. Kazmi I Geologist I I I I I a I Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey, U. Sr Department of the Interior I September, 1965 I I I I CONTENTS Page I Summary 1 Introduction 2 i Purpose and scope of the study 2 , Location and general features 3 Previous work 3 I Climate 4 I Physiography and drainage 6 Numbering system for wells and springs 7 I General hydrogeologic features 7 I Geomorphic features 7 Lithologic and hydrologic features of the rocks 8 I Hydrology 9 I Precipitation 9 Surface water, by Donald O. Moore 12 I General conditions 12 I Estimated average annual runoff 14 Development 17 I Ground water 18 , Occurrence and movement 18 I Recharge 20 Discharge 22 I Evapotranspiration 22 I Springs 22 Subsurface outflow 24 I I",,,,' Contents - Continued I Page Discharge from wells 24 I Water budget 25 I Perennial yield 26 Storage 27 I Chemical quality of the water 27 , Suitability for agricultural use 27 Water quality and its relation to I the ground-water system 28 Development 29 I References cited 34 I List of previously published reports in this series 37 I I I I ,I I I I I I I TABLES Page I Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A R Iz O N a U T a H California C a L If O R N Ia Oregon Idaho
    DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BASINS OF NEVADA £ * # £ 47N £ £ J OREGON IDAHO k a 11 e Jackpot r 18E 19E 10 24E 25E e b 20E 21E 5 McDermitt r 47N Denio £ 22E 26E 28E i 23E C 27E d E E Owyhee g e 2 2 68E 69E 70E / / 1 66E 67E 1 55E 6 1 47N 63E 64E 65E 4 46N 3 44E 46E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 57E 59E 60E 61E 62E 45E 47E 48E 5 2 54E 47N 56E 58E 30E 31E 32E 33E s 140 34E 35E 38E 41E B l 36E 37E 39E l 13 U 40E 42E 43E ru C V a K n a r e n F i R 46N n e a y g 39 o v u Mountain i n s i v 41 R 12 R e iv r Jarbidge Peak City e * 45N 2 *Capitol Peak 34 46N r 46N * Matterhorn C O re w ek 45N No y Copper Mtn. rth h n Fo e * o R rk e 33B 37 lm i L R a 44N v it 45N S 30A e t iv 4 140 r le e VU r 7 45N H u m Sun C 44N n bo 38 reek n ld 0 i t 40 u 68 9 Q Granite Peak 35 Wildhorse 44N 1 43N 33A * 8 3 29 Reservoir 9 44N 43N Vya U M a r 42N 43N ys Orovada* Santa Rosa Peak 30B 43N T 42N 27 *McAfee Peak 14 67 41N *Jacks Peak 42N A R S N 42N out h i F o v 41N e o r r r k t h 189B 189C L i 189A H t t l 40N Chimney e 41N 15 F 41N H Reservoir o u r r 25 e m k Tecoma v 42 40N i b 44 R o l d Humboldt t 36 R 40N i 39N 69 v r e 40N r e 93 v H U M B O L D T i £ 26 ¤ 189D 39N R t Montello ld 63 o b 39N 32 m R 38N 39N u E Li K O v 233 H e VU r 38N e 225 n l t VU in t u i Q ¤£95 L 31 38N 38N 66 Cobre 37N 16 37N Wells Ma 28 gg 80 ie ¨¦§ 37N Pilot Peak* A 37N Oasis 36N 36N C I r R e 93 e o ¤£ k c k 36N * Hole in the 36N Mtn.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report October 2004 Integration of Remote Sensing RSAC-65-RPT1
    Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Intermountain Regional Office United States Department of Agriculture R5 Remote Sensing Lab Forest Service—Engineering Adaptive Management Services Remote Sensing Applications Center Technical Report October 2004 Integration of Remote Sensing RSAC-65-RPT1 Existing Vegetation Mapping: Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest John Gillham, Haans Fisk, Wendy Goetz, Henry Lachowski Remote Sensing Applications Center Salt Lake City, UT Prepared for: The Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest USDA Forest Service The Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), has developed this information for the guidance of its employees, its contractors, and its cooperating Federal and State agencies and is not responsi- ble for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone except its own employees. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this document is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official evaluation, conclusion, recommendation, endorsement, or approval by the Department of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. The USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of pro- gram information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Agenda Central Nevada Regional Water Authority
    AGENDA CENTRAL NEVADA REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY Nugget Casino Resort (Cascade 1) 1100 Nugget Avenue Sparks, NV September 25, 2019 10:00 a.m. Notes: 1. Items on this agenda on which action may be taken are followed by the term "Possible Action." 2. Items on this agenda may be taken out of order, combined with other agenda items for consideration, removed from the agenda, or delayed for discussion at any time. 3. Reasonable efforts will be made to assist and accommodate physically handicapped persons attending the meeting. Please call 775.443.7667 in advance so arrangements can be made. This agenda was transmitted by email September 18, 2019 for posting by the Churchill County Clerk (775.423.6028), Elko County Clerk (775.753.4600), Esmeralda County Clerk (775.485.6309), Eureka County Clerk (775.237.5262), Lander County Clerk (775.635.5738), Nye County Clerk (775.482.8127), Pershing County Clerk (775.273.2208) and the White Pine County Clerk (775.293.6509). ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER – Chairman’s welcome, roll call, determination of quorum, pledge of allegiance and introductions. (Discussion) 2. PUBLIC COMMENT – This time is devoted to comments by the general public pursuant to NRS 241.020(2)(c)(3). No action will be taken on matters raised under public comment until the matter itself has been included on an agenda as an action item. (Discussion) 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA – Approval of the agenda for the Authority’s meeting of September 25, 2019, including taking items out of sequence, deleting items and adding items which require action upon a finding that an emergency exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Peak and Route List (Routes Grade IV Or Higher in Red; Attempts Not Listed)
    Peak and Route List (routes grade IV or higher in red; attempts not listed) International Barbeau Peak West ridge Ellesmere Island, Canadian Arctic Peak N. of Barbeau SE ridge? Ellesmere Island Wilson's Wall SW face, first ascent Baffin Island, Canadian Arctic (VI, 5.11 A4) Dhalagiri VII (Putha Hiunchuli) East ridge Dhualagiri Range, Nepal Turka Himal East ridge, first ascent? Dhualagiri Range, Nepal Cerro Aconcagua False Polish Glacier Andes, Argentina Cerro Las Menas trail Honduras (high point) Mt. Arrowsmith reg. couloir Vancouver Island, Canada Lowell Peak South Face, first ascent St. Elias Range, Canada Mt. Alverstone NE 5 North Ridge, first ascent St. Elias Range, Canada Peak 12,792 South Ridge Altai Mountains, Russian Siberia Alaska Denali West Buttress Alaska Range Mt. Marathon trail Kenai Peninsula Institute Peak SW face, winter ascent Eastern Alaska Range (Delta Range) Mt. Prindle Giradelli (III 5.9) White Mountains, Interior Gunnysack Creek peak W side Eastern Alaska Range (Delta Range) Chena Dome (2x) trail Chena River State Rec. Area Falsoola Peak north col Endicott Mountains, Brooks Range Green Steps (Keystone Canyon) (IV, WI 4-5) Valdez ice Silvertip Peak west side (day push) Eastern Alaska Range (Delta Range) Pinnell Mountain trail Porcupine Dome trail Mt. Sukakpak Reg. Route Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Unnamed peak East ridge South of Black Rapids Glacier, (Eastern Alaska Range) The Moose's Tooth Ham and Eggs (V, AI5 M4) Central Alaska Range Arizona Humphreys Peak (state highpoint) Weatherford Canyon marathon California: Yosemite only: El Capitan Zodiac (2x) Tangerine Trip The Nose Salathe Wall Zenyatta Mondatta Half Dome NW face, Regular Route (2x, incl.
    [Show full text]
  • NAZEWNICTWO GEOGRAFICZNE ŚWIATA Ameryka Australia I Oceania
    KOMISJA STANDARYZACJI NAZW GEOGRAFICZNYCH POZA GRANICAMI POLSKI przy Głównym Geodecie Kraju NAZEWNICTWO GEOGRAFICZNE ŚWIATA Zeszyt 1 Ameryka Australia i Oceania GŁÓWNY URZĄD GEODEZJI I KARTOGRAFII Warszawa 2004 KOMISJA STANDARYZACJI NAZW GEOGRAFICZNYCH POZA GRANICAMI POLSKI przy Głównym Geodecie Kraju Maksymilian Skotnicki (przewodniczący), Ewa Wolnicz-Pawłowska (zastępca przewodniczącego), Izabella Krauze-Tomczyk (sekretarz); członkowie: Stanisław Alexandrowicz, Andrzej Czerny, Janusz Danecki, Janusz Gołaski, Romuald Huszcza, Sabina Kacieszczenko, Dariusz Kalisiewicz, Artur Karp, Ryszard Król, Marek Makowski, Andrzej Markowski, Jerzy Ostrowski, Henryk Skotarczyk, Andrzej Pisowicz, Bogumiła Więcław, Mariusz Woźniak, Bogusław R. Zagórski, Maciej Zych Opracowanie Bartosz Fabiszewski, Katarzyna Peńsko-Skoczylas, Maksymilian Skotnicki, Maciej Zych Opracowanie redakcyjne Izabella Krauze-Tomczyk, Jerzy Ostrowski, Maksymilian Skotnicki, Maciej Zych Projekt okładki Agnieszka Kijowska © Copyright by Główny Geodeta Kraju ISBN 83-239-7552-3 Skład komputerowy i druk Instytut Geodezji i Kartografii, Warszawa Spis treści Od Wydawcy ..................................................................................................................... 7 Przedmowa ........................................................................................................................ 9 Wprowadzenie ................................................................................................................... 11 Część 1. AMERYKA ANGUILLA .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]